@codemcp/workflows-core 5.2.2 → 5.2.4

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@codemcp/workflows-core",
-  "version": "5.2.2",
+  "version": "5.2.4",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",
   "type": "module",

package/resources/workflows/adr.yaml

@@ -23,20 +23,27 @@ states:
   context:
     description: 'Define the architectural problem or decision that needs to be made'
     default_instructions: |
-      You are starting an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) workflow.
+      **STEP 1:** Determine ADR storage location
+      - If `$ARCHITECTURE_DOC` exists: Use it to determine ADR storage location
+      - Otherwise: Document ADR decisions in the plan file
 
-      **Your tasks:**
-      1. Check if $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists to determine ADR storage location
-      2. Look for existing ADRs to understand current format/numbering
-      3. Help user clearly define the architectural problem or decision needed
-      4. Identify key stakeholders who should be involved
-      5. IMPORTANT: Gather information about the quality attributes (non-functional requirements)
-      that are relevant to this decision (e.g., performance, security, maintainability)
-      6. Document the context and problem statement
-      7. Create initial ADR structure using existing format or template above
+      **STEP 2:** Look for existing ADRs to understand current format and numbering
 
-      Focus on understanding WHAT decision needs to be made and WHY it's important.
-      Don't evaluate technical options or make the decision yet - that happens in the decide phase.
+      **STEP 3:** Help user clearly define the architectural problem or decision needed
+
+      **STEP 4:** Identify key stakeholders who should be involved
+
+      **STEP 5:** Gather information about quality attributes (non-functional requirements) relevant to this decision
+      - Performance implications
+      - Security requirements
+      - Maintainability concerns
+      - Other relevant attributes
+
+      **STEP 6:** Document the context and problem statement
+
+      **STEP 7:** Create initial ADR structure using existing format or provided template
+
+      Focus on understanding WHAT decision needs to be made and WHY it's important. Do not evaluate technical options yet—that happens in the decide phase.
 
     additional_instructions: |
       **ADR Template (use if no existing ADRs found):**
@@ -71,20 +78,21 @@ states:
   research:
     description: 'Investigate options, gather information, and analyze alternatives'
     default_instructions: |
-      You are in the research phase for the ADR. This is the most important phase of the workflow.
+      **STEP 1:** Research available options and alternatives for the decision
+
+      **STEP 2:** Gather technical information, constraints, and requirements
 
-      **Your tasks:**
-      1. Research available options and alternatives for the decision
-      2. Gather technical information, constraints, and requirements
-      3. Analyze trade-offs between different approaches:
-        - Evaluate each option based on the defined quality attributes
-        - Many solutions will require knowledge about a particular technology. Query the user about his experience with it.
-        - Don't jump to judgments: Consider the user's perspective on the decision-making process
-      4. Document findings in the "Alternatives Considered" section
-      5. Identify pros and cons for each option
+      **STEP 3:** Analyze trade-offs between different approaches
+      - Evaluate each option based on defined quality attributes
+      - Query user about experience with specific technologies
+      - Consider user's perspective on the decision-making process
+      - Avoid premature judgments
 
-      Work with the user to thoroughly understand all viable options before making a decision.
-      Update the ADR with research findings but don't make the final decision yet.
+      **STEP 4:** Document findings in the "Alternatives Considered" section
+
+      **STEP 5:** Identify pros and cons for each option
+
+      Work with the user to thoroughly understand all viable options before making a decision. Update the ADR with research findings but do not make the final decision yet.
 
     transitions:
       - trigger: research_complete
@@ -94,19 +102,21 @@ states:
   decide:
     description: 'Make the architectural decision and document the rationale'
     default_instructions: |
-      You are in the decide phase for the ADR.
+      **STEP 1:** Help user make the final architectural decision based on research conducted
+
+      **STEP 2:** Document the chosen option in the "Decision" section
+
+      **STEP 3:** Provide clear rationale for why this option was selected
+
+      **STEP 4:** Document positive consequences (benefits) of the decision
 
-      **Your tasks:**
-      1. Help user make the final architectural decision based on research
-      2. Document the chosen option in the "Decision" section
-      3. Provide clear rationale for why this option was selected
-      4. Document positive consequences (benefits) of the decision
-      5. Document negative consequences (drawbacks/risks) of the decision
-      6. Ensure the decision is specific and actionable
-      7. Update ADR status to "Accepted" (or "Proposed" if needs approval)
+      **STEP 5:** Document negative consequences (drawbacks and risks) of the decision
 
-      Focus on making a clear, well-reasoned decision with documented rationale.
-      The decision should be based on the research conducted in the previous phase.
+      **STEP 6:** Ensure the decision is specific and actionable
+
+      **STEP 7:** Update ADR status to "Accepted" (or "Proposed" if approval is needed)
+
+      Focus on making a clear, well-reasoned decision with documented rationale based on the research conducted in the previous phase.
 
     transitions:
       - trigger: decision_complete
@@ -123,19 +133,23 @@ states:
   commit:
     description: 'Finalize the ADR with validation and cleanup'
     default_instructions: |
-      You are in the commit phase for the ADR.
-
-      **Your tasks:**
-      1. Review ADR completeness and quality
-      2. Ensure proper formatting and structure
-      3. Verify all sections are filled appropriately
-      4. Check that consequences (positive and negative) are documented
-      5. Ensure alternatives considered are listed
-      6. Finalize ADR numbering if needed
-      7. Update ADR status to final state (Accepted/Approved)
-      8. Save/integrate ADR into $ARCHITECTURE_DOC or appropriate location
-
-      This is the final validation and cleanup phase before the ADR is complete.
+      **STEP 1:** Review ADR completeness and quality
+
+      **STEP 2:** Ensure proper formatting and structure
+
+      **STEP 3:** Verify all sections are filled appropriately
+
+      **STEP 4:** Check that consequences (positive and negative) are documented
+
+      **STEP 5:** Ensure alternatives considered are listed
+
+      **STEP 6:** Finalize ADR numbering if needed
+
+      **STEP 7:** Update ADR status to final state (Accepted or Approved)
+
+      **STEP 8:** Save and integrate ADR into `$ARCHITECTURE_DOC` or appropriate location
+
+      Complete final validation and cleanup before the ADR is finalized.
 
     transitions:
       - trigger: need_decision_changes

package/resources/workflows/big-bang-conversion.yaml

@@ -27,30 +27,39 @@ states:
   conversion_planning:
     description: 'Plan the complete system replacement strategy and approach'
     default_instructions: >
-      You are in the conversion planning phase for big-bang conversion workflow.
-
-      **Your Tasks:**
-      1. **Reference Architecture Documentation**: Check if $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists and reference it for system understanding
-      2. **Search for Architecture**: If $ARCHITECTURE_DOC is not available, search the project for architecture documentation (README.md, docs/, ARCHITECTURE.md, etc.). Enhance the existing $ARCHITECTURE_DOC with your findings
-      3. **Reference Existing Tests**: If available, reference existing boundary tests and system baselines
-      4. **Analyze Current System**: Examine the codebase to understand system architecture and functionality
-      5. **Define Conversion Scope**: Establish what will be replaced and what will remain
-      6. **Plan Conversion Strategy**: Design the approach for complete system replacement
-      7. **Risk Assessment**: Identify risks and mitigation strategies for big-bang approach
-      8. **Timeline Planning**: Establish realistic timeline for conversion execution
-
-      **Interview the User (Business & Operational Context):**
-      - "What business constraints or deadlines do we need to consider for this conversion?"
-      - "What is the acceptable downtime window for this conversion?"
-      - "What are the rollback criteria if the conversion encounters issues?"
-
-      **Best Practices to Apply:**
-      - **Comprehensive Planning**: Plan every aspect of the conversion thoroughly
-      - **Risk Mitigation**: Identify and plan for potential failure scenarios
-      - **Rollback Strategy**: Always have a plan to revert if conversion fails
-      - **Stakeholder Communication**: Keep all stakeholders informed of the plan
-      - **Incremental Validation**: Plan validation checkpoints throughout conversion
-      - **Resource Planning**: Ensure adequate resources for conversion execution
+      **STEP 1: Reference Architecture Documentation**
+      - Check if `$ARCHITECTURE_DOC` exists
+      - Review current system understanding from documentation
+      - If unavailable, search for architecture docs (README.md, docs/, ARCHITECTURE.md)
+      - Enhance `$ARCHITECTURE_DOC` with your findings
+
+      **STEP 2: Analyze Current System**
+      - Examine codebase to understand system architecture
+      - Review existing boundary tests and system baselines if available
+      - Document current functionality and constraints
+
+      **STEP 3: Define Conversion Scope**
+      - Establish what will be replaced
+      - Identify what will remain unchanged
+      - Document scope boundaries clearly
+
+      **STEP 4: Plan Conversion Strategy**
+      - Design the approach for complete system replacement
+      - Identify risks and mitigation strategies
+      - Establish realistic timeline for conversion execution
+
+      **STEP 5: Interview the User (Business & Operational Context)**
+      - What business constraints or deadlines apply to this conversion?
+      - What is the acceptable downtime window?
+      - What are the rollback criteria if conversion encounters issues?
+
+      **STEP 6: Apply Best Practices**
+      - Plan every aspect of conversion thoroughly
+      - Identify and plan for potential failure scenarios
+      - Have a plan to revert if conversion fails
+      - Keep all stakeholders informed of the plan
+      - Plan validation checkpoints throughout conversion
+      - Ensure adequate resources for conversion execution
 
       Update the plan file with conversion planning decisions and mark completed tasks.
     transitions:
@@ -65,38 +74,48 @@ states:
   target_architecture_design:
     description: 'Design the architecture for the new system in target technology'
     default_instructions: >
-      You are in the target architecture design phase. Design the new system architecture in the target technology stack.
-
-      **Your Tasks:**
-      1. **Reference Architecture Documentation**: Check if $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists and reference it for current system understanding
-      2. **Create/Update Design Documentation**: Check if $DESIGN_DOC exists and reference it. If not available, create or enhance $DESIGN_DOC with your design decisions
-      3. **Analyze Current Architecture**: Examine the existing system architecture and patterns
-      4. **Technology Stack Selection**: Finalize the target technology stack and frameworks
-      5. **Architecture Pattern Design**: Choose appropriate architectural patterns for the new system
-      6. **Component Design**: Design how current components will be reimplemented
-      7. **Integration Design**: Plan how the new system will integrate with external systems
-      8. **Data Architecture**: Design data storage and management for the new system
-      9. **Deployment Architecture**: Plan how the new system will be deployed and operated
-
-      **Interview the User (Requirements & Constraints):**
-      - "What are the performance requirements for the new system?"
-      - "Are there any scalability requirements we need to design for?"
-      - "Are there any budget constraints that affect technology choices?"
-
-      **Best Practices to Apply:**
-      - **Modern Architecture Patterns**: Leverage modern architectural approaches
-      - **Scalability Design**: Design for future growth and scalability
-      - **Maintainability**: Choose patterns that improve long-term maintainability
-      - **Technology Alignment**: Align with organizational technology standards
-      - **Performance Optimization**: Design for optimal performance characteristics
-      - **Security by Design**: Incorporate security considerations from the start
-
-      **Architecture Design Framework:**
-      - **Functional Preservation**: Ensure new architecture supports all current functionality
-      - **Modern Patterns**: Apply microservices, event-driven, or other modern patterns as appropriate
-      - **Technology Best Practices**: Follow best practices for the target technology stack
-      - **Integration Strategy**: Design clean integration patterns with external systems
-      - **Data Migration**: Plan how current data will be migrated to new system
+      **STEP 1: Reference Architecture Documentation**
+      - If `$ARCHITECTURE_DOC` exists: Review current system understanding from it
+      - Otherwise: Elaborate architectural options and present them to the user
+
+      **STEP 2: Create/Update Design Documentation**
+      - If `$DESIGN_DOC` exists: Reference it for existing design decisions
+      - Otherwise: Document design decisions in the plan file
+
+      **STEP 3: Analyze Current Architecture**
+      - Examine existing system architecture and patterns
+      - Identify architectural constraints and requirements
+
+      **STEP 4: Select Technology Stack**
+      - Finalize the target technology stack and frameworks
+      - Align with organizational technology standards
+
+      **STEP 5: Design Architecture Patterns**
+      - Choose appropriate architectural patterns for new system
+      - Design component reimplementation approach
+      - Plan external system integration strategy
+      - Design data storage and management approach
+      - Plan deployment and operational architecture
+
+      **STEP 6: Interview the User (Requirements & Constraints)**
+      - What are the performance requirements for the new system?
+      - Are there any scalability requirements we need to design for?
+      - Are there any budget constraints that affect technology choices?
+
+      **STEP 7: Apply Best Practices**
+      - Leverage modern architectural approaches
+      - Design for future growth and scalability
+      - Choose patterns that improve long-term maintainability
+      - Align with organizational technology standards
+      - Design for optimal performance characteristics
+      - Incorporate security considerations from the start
+
+      **STEP 8: Validate Design Framework**
+      - Ensure new architecture supports all current functionality
+      - Apply microservices, event-driven, or other modern patterns as appropriate
+      - Follow best practices for the target technology stack
+      - Design clean integration patterns with external systems
+      - Plan data migration from current system to new system
 
       Update the plan file with architecture design decisions and validate with the user.
     transitions:
@@ -116,38 +135,42 @@ states:
   behavioral_comparison_setup:
     description: 'Set up mechanisms to compare behavior between current and new systems'
     default_instructions: >
-      You are in the behavioral comparison setup phase. Design and implement mechanisms to validate functional equivalence.
-
-      **Your Tasks:**
-      1. **Comparison Strategy Design**: Design approach for comparing current and new system behavior
-      2. **Mechanism Selection**: Choose appropriate comparison mechanisms for your infrastructure
-      3. **Implementation Planning**: Plan how to implement the chosen comparison approach
-      4. **Data Capture Design**: Design how to capture and compare system behavior
-      5. **Validation Criteria**: Define what constitutes successful behavioral equivalence
-      6. **Automation Planning**: Plan automated comparison and validation processes
-
-      **Interview the User (Infrastructure & Operational Context):**
-      - "What level of traffic or load do you need to validate against?"
-      - "Are there any operational constraints for running parallel systems?"
-
-      **Best Practice Mechanisms to Suggest:**
-      - **Sidecar Pattern**: Deploy comparison logic alongside applications
-      - **Proxy/Gateway**: Route traffic through comparison proxy
-      - **Shadow Traffic**: Send duplicate traffic to both systems
-      - **Event Streaming**: Compare system events and state changes
-      - **API Response Comparison**: Compare API responses between systems
-      - **Database State Comparison**: Compare database states after operations
-      - **Log Analysis**: Compare system logs and behavior patterns
-      - **Synthetic Testing**: Use automated tests to compare behavior
-
-      **Implementation Approaches:**
-      - **Traffic Mirroring**: Mirror production traffic to new system
-      - **Parallel Execution**: Run both systems in parallel with comparison
-      - **Staged Rollout**: Gradually shift traffic while comparing
-      - **A/B Testing**: Compare systems with controlled traffic splits
-      - **Canary Deployment**: Test new system with small traffic percentage
-
-      Interview the user about their infrastructure and suggest appropriate mechanisms.
+      **STEP 1: Design Comparison Strategy**
+      - Design approach for comparing current and new system behavior
+      - Choose appropriate comparison mechanisms for your infrastructure
+      - Plan how to implement the chosen comparison approach
+
+      **STEP 2: Design Data Capture**
+      - Design how to capture system behavior
+      - Design how to compare behavior between systems
+      - Define what constitutes successful behavioral equivalence
+
+      **STEP 3: Plan Automation**
+      - Plan automated comparison processes
+      - Plan automated validation processes
+      - Define measurement and reporting mechanisms
+
+      **STEP 4: Suggest Best Practice Mechanisms**
+      - Sidecar Pattern: Deploy comparison logic alongside applications
+      - Proxy/Gateway: Route traffic through comparison proxy
+      - Shadow Traffic: Send duplicate traffic to both systems
+      - Event Streaming: Compare system events and state changes
+      - API Response Comparison: Compare API responses between systems
+      - Database State Comparison: Compare database states after operations
+      - Log Analysis: Compare system logs and behavior patterns
+      - Synthetic Testing: Use automated tests to compare behavior
+
+      **STEP 5: Recommend Implementation Approaches**
+      - Traffic Mirroring: Mirror production traffic to new system
+      - Parallel Execution: Run both systems in parallel with comparison
+      - Staged Rollout: Gradually shift traffic while comparing
+      - A/B Testing: Compare systems with controlled traffic splits
+      - Canary Deployment: Test new system with small traffic percentage
+
+      **STEP 6: Interview the User (Infrastructure & Operational Context)**
+      - What level of traffic or load do you need to validate against?
+      - Are there any operational constraints for running parallel systems?
+
       Update the plan file with comparison setup decisions.
     transitions:
       - trigger: 'refine_comparison'
@@ -166,37 +189,50 @@ states:
   implementation_strategy:
     description: 'Plan detailed implementation approach for the new system'
     default_instructions: >
-      You are in the implementation strategy phase. Plan the systematic approach for building the new system.
-
-      **Your Tasks:**
-      1. **Reference Design Documentation**: Check $DESIGN_DOC for target architecture and design decisions
-      2. **Implementation Phases**: Break down implementation into manageable phases
-      3. **Development Approach**: Plan development methodology and practices
-      4. **Quality Assurance**: Plan testing and quality assurance throughout implementation
-      5. **Integration Strategy**: Plan how to integrate new components as they're built
-      6. **Validation Checkpoints**: Plan regular validation against functional equivalence
-      7. **Team Coordination**: Plan how development team will coordinate work
-      8. **Risk Management**: Plan how to manage implementation risks
-
-      **Interview the User (Team & Process):**
-      - "What development methodology does your team prefer (Agile, Scrum, etc.)?"
-      - "How large is the development team for this conversion?"
-
-      **Best Practices to Apply:**
-      - **Iterative Development**: Build and validate incrementally
-      - **Continuous Integration**: Integrate and test frequently
-      - **Test-Driven Development**: Write tests before implementation
-      - **Code Quality**: Maintain high code quality standards
-      - **Documentation**: Document decisions and implementation details
-      - **Regular Validation**: Validate against legacy system frequently
-
-      **Implementation Strategy Framework:**
-      - **Phase Planning**: Logical phases that deliver business value
-      - **Validation Gates**: Regular checkpoints to validate functional equivalence
-      - **Quality Assurance**: Comprehensive testing at each phase
-      - **Risk Mitigation**: Address highest risks first
-      - **Team Coordination**: Clear communication and coordination processes
-      - **Progress Tracking**: Measurable progress indicators
+      **STEP 1: Reference Design Documentation**
+      - If `$DESIGN_DOC` exists: Check it for target architecture and design decisions
+      - Otherwise: Elaborate design options and present them to the user
+      - Review implementation constraints and requirements
+
+      **STEP 2: Break Down Implementation**
+      - Break implementation into manageable phases
+      - Define logical phases that deliver business value
+      - Establish sequence and dependencies
+
+      **STEP 3: Plan Development Approach**
+      - Plan development methodology and practices
+      - Plan testing and quality assurance throughout implementation
+      - Plan how development team will coordinate work
+
+      **STEP 4: Plan Integration Strategy**
+      - Plan how to integrate new components as they're built
+      - Plan regular validation against functional equivalence
+      - Plan continuous integration and testing practices
+
+      **STEP 5: Plan Risk Management**
+      - Identify highest risks first
+      - Address implementation risks systematically
+      - Plan contingency approaches for high-risk areas
+
+      **STEP 6: Interview the User (Team & Process)**
+      - What development methodology does your team prefer (Agile, Scrum, etc.)?
+      - How large is the development team for this conversion?
+
+      **STEP 7: Apply Best Practices**
+      - Build and validate incrementally
+      - Integrate and test frequently
+      - Write tests before implementation
+      - Maintain high code quality standards
+      - Document decisions and implementation details
+      - Validate against legacy system frequently
+
+      **STEP 8: Create Strategy Framework**
+      - Define logical phases that deliver business value
+      - Establish regular checkpoints to validate functional equivalence
+      - Plan comprehensive testing at each phase
+      - Address highest risks first
+      - Establish clear communication and coordination processes
+      - Define measurable progress indicators
 
       Update the plan file with implementation strategy and validate with the user.
     transitions:
@@ -216,30 +252,37 @@ states:
   parallel_implementation:
     description: 'Build new system while maintaining test compatibility and validation'
     default_instructions: >
-      You are in the parallel implementation phase. Build the new system systematically with regular validation.
-
-      **Your Tasks:**
-      1. **Follow Design Documentation**: Reference $DESIGN_DOC for implementation guidance and architectural decisions
-      2. **Systematic Implementation**: Build new system components according to implementation strategy
-      3. **Test Compatibility**: Ensure new system passes existing functional equivalence tests
-      4. **Regular Validation**: Validate new system behavior against legacy system regularly
-      5. **Quality Assurance**: Maintain high code quality and testing standards
-      6. **Integration Testing**: Test integration between new components as they're built
-      7. **Performance Validation**: Ensure new system meets performance requirements
-      8. **Documentation**: Document implementation decisions and system behavior
-
-      **Interview the User (Implementation Priorities):**
-      - "Which components or business domains should we implement first?"
-
-      **Best Practices to Apply:**
-      - **Incremental Development**: Build and validate one component at a time
-      - **Continuous Testing**: Run tests continuously as implementation progresses
-      - **Regular Integration**: Integrate new components frequently
-      - **Performance Monitoring**: Monitor performance throughout implementation
-      - **Code Reviews**: Maintain code quality through regular reviews
-      - **Documentation**: Keep implementation documentation current
-
-      **Implementation Guidelines:**
+      **STEP 1: Reference Design Documentation**
+      - If `$DESIGN_DOC` exists: Check it for implementation guidance and architectural decisions
+      - Otherwise: Elaborate implementation options and present them to the user
+
+      **STEP 2: Build System Components**
+      - Build new system components according to implementation strategy
+      - Ensure new system passes existing functional equivalence tests
+      - Validate new system behavior against legacy system regularly
+
+      **STEP 3: Maintain Quality Standards**
+      - Maintain high code quality and testing standards
+      - Test integration between new components as they're built
+      - Ensure new system meets performance requirements
+
+      **STEP 4: Document Implementation**
+      - Document implementation decisions as they're made
+      - Document system behavior and design rationale
+      - Keep implementation documentation current
+
+      **STEP 5: Interview the User (Implementation Priorities)**
+      - Which components or business domains should we implement first?
+
+      **STEP 6: Apply Best Practices**
+      - Build and validate one component at a time
+      - Run tests continuously as implementation progresses
+      - Integrate new components frequently
+      - Monitor performance throughout implementation
+      - Maintain code quality through regular reviews
+      - Keep implementation documentation current
+
+      **STEP 7: Follow Implementation Guidelines**
       - Start with core business functionality
       - Validate each component against existing tests
       - Maintain backward compatibility during development
@@ -475,44 +518,60 @@ states:
   conversion_readiness:
     description: 'Validate conversion readiness and finalize preparation for production execution'
     default_instructions: >
-      You are in the conversion readiness phase. The CONVERSION_PLAN.md file has been created at .vibe/CONVERSION_PLAN.md.
-
-      **Your Tasks:**
-      1. **Final System Validation**: Validate that new system passes all functional equivalence tests
-      2. **Behavioral Comparison Validation**: Confirm behavioral comparison mechanisms work correctly
-      3. **Performance Validation**: Ensure new system meets performance requirements
-      4. **Integration Validation**: Validate all external system integrations work correctly
-      5. **Conversion Plan Review**: Review and customize the CONVERSION_PLAN.md for your specific environment
-      6. **Team Readiness**: Ensure operations team is ready for production conversion
-      7. **Final Go/No-Go Assessment**: Make final assessment of conversion readiness
-
-      **Review and Present to User:**
-      - Review new system functional equivalence test results and present findings
-      - Present behavioral comparison mechanism status and validation results
-      - Review CONVERSION_PLAN.md completeness and present customization needs
-      - Present final conversion readiness assessment and any remaining concerns
-
-      **Best Practices to Apply:**
-      - **Comprehensive Validation**: Validate every aspect of system readiness
-      - **Risk Assessment**: Assess and mitigate all identified risks
-      - **Team Preparation**: Ensure all teams are prepared for conversion
-      - **Documentation Review**: Ensure all documentation is complete and accurate
-      - **Contingency Planning**: Have backup plans for all scenarios
-      - **Stakeholder Communication**: Keep stakeholders informed of readiness status
-
-      **Conversion Readiness Checklist:**
+      The `CONVERSION_PLAN.md` file has been created at `.vibe/CONVERSION_PLAN.md`.
+
+      **STEP 1: Validate System Functionality**
+      - Validate that new system passes all functional equivalence tests
+      - Ensure behavioral comparison mechanisms work correctly
+      - Verify new system meets performance requirements
+
+      **STEP 2: Validate Integrations**
+      - Validate all external system integrations work correctly
+      - Test integration endpoints and data flows
+      - Confirm integration error handling works properly
+
+      **STEP 3: Review Conversion Plan**
+      - Review `.vibe/CONVERSION_PLAN.md` for completeness
+      - Customize the plan for your specific environment
+      - Ensure rollback procedures are documented and tested
+
+      **STEP 4: Ensure Team Readiness**
+      - Confirm operations team is ready for production conversion
+      - Verify all teams have necessary documentation
+      - Confirm emergency contacts and escalation procedures are defined
+
+      **STEP 5: Assess Final Readiness**
+      - Make final assessment of conversion readiness
+      - Identify and address any remaining concerns
+      - Validate all risk mitigation strategies are in place
+
+      **STEP 6: Review and Present Findings to User**
+      - Review new system functional equivalence test results
+      - Present behavioral comparison mechanism status
+      - Review `CONVERSION_PLAN.md` customization needs
+      - Present final conversion readiness assessment
+
+      **STEP 7: Apply Best Practices**
+      - Validate every aspect of system readiness
+      - Assess and mitigate all identified risks
+      - Ensure all teams are prepared for conversion
+      - Ensure all documentation is complete and accurate
+      - Have backup plans for all scenarios
+      - Keep stakeholders informed of readiness status
+
+      **STEP 8: Verify Conversion Readiness Checklist**
       - New system passes all boundary tests (functional equivalence proven)
       - Behavioral comparison mechanism validates system equivalence
       - Performance requirements are met or exceeded
       - All external integrations work correctly
-      - CONVERSION_PLAN.md is customized for your environment
+      - `CONVERSION_PLAN.md` is customized for your environment
       - Operations team is trained and ready
       - Rollback procedures are tested and ready
 
-      **Final Deliverables:**
+      **STEP 9: Confirm Final Deliverables**
       - Fully functional new system with proven equivalence
       - Operational behavioral comparison mechanism
-      - Comprehensive CONVERSION_PLAN.md for production execution
+      - Comprehensive `CONVERSION_PLAN.md` for production execution
       - Validated rollback procedures
       - Ready operations team