@ckelsoe/prompt-architect 3.0.2 → 3.1.1

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/rpef_template.txt

@@ -1,26 +1,26 @@
-You are an expert Prompt Engineer performing reverse prompt engineering.
-
-TASK:
-Analyze the following [input and] output. Reconstruct the prompt that would
-consistently produce this type of output. Your recovered prompt should be
-reusable — replace specific details with clearly marked [PLACEHOLDER] variables.
-
-[INPUT DATA (if applicable — omit if output-only):]
-[Paste the input that produced the output, or remove this section]
-
-OUTPUT SAMPLE:
-[Paste the output you want to reverse-engineer]
-
-ANALYSIS INSTRUCTIONS:
-Examine the output for:
-- Implied role or persona
-- Tone and voice
-- Structural and formatting patterns
-- Level of detail and scope
-- Implicit constraints (what it did NOT do)
-- Reasoning style
-
-RECOVERED PROMPT:
-Generate a reusable prompt template that reliably reproduces this type of output.
-Use [PLACEHOLDER] for variable elements.
-Only proceed when at least 80% confident in the reconstruction.
+You are an expert Prompt Engineer performing reverse prompt engineering.
+
+TASK:
+Analyze the following [input and] output. Reconstruct the prompt that would
+consistently produce this type of output. Your recovered prompt should be
+reusable — replace specific details with clearly marked [PLACEHOLDER] variables.
+
+[INPUT DATA (if applicable — omit if output-only):]
+[Paste the input that produced the output, or remove this section]
+
+OUTPUT SAMPLE:
+[Paste the output you want to reverse-engineer]
+
+ANALYSIS INSTRUCTIONS:
+Examine the output for:
+- Implied role or persona
+- Tone and voice
+- Structural and formatting patterns
+- Level of detail and scope
+- Implicit constraints (what it did NOT do)
+- Reasoning style
+
+RECOVERED PROMPT:
+Generate a reusable prompt template that reliably reproduces this type of output.
+Use [PLACEHOLDER] for variable elements.
+Only proceed when at least 80% confident in the reconstruction.

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/rtf_template.txt

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
-ROLE:
-[Define the expertise or perspective needed for this task]
-
-TASK:
-[State clearly and specifically what needs to be done. Be explicit about the deliverable.]
-
-FORMAT:
-[Specify exactly how the output should be structured:
-- Overall format (document, code, list, table, etc.)
-- Required sections or components
-- Length constraints
-- Style requirements
-- Any specific formatting rules]
+ROLE:
+[Define the expertise or perspective needed for this task]
+
+TASK:
+[State clearly and specifically what needs to be done. Be explicit about the deliverable.]
+
+FORMAT:
+[Specify exactly how the output should be structured:
+- Overall format (document, code, list, table, etc.)
+- Required sections or components
+- Length constraints
+- Style requirements
+- Any specific formatting rules]

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/self-refine_template.txt

@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
-INITIAL OUTPUT:
-[Paste the output to improve, or ask the AI to generate a first draft here]
-
-FEEDBACK DIMENSIONS:
-Review the output above for:
-1. [Dimension 1 — e.g., "Clarity: Are there any ambiguous or hard-to-parse sentences?"]
-2. [Dimension 2 — e.g., "Completeness: What important points are missing?"]
-3. [Dimension 3 — e.g., "Tone: Is the voice appropriate for the audience?"]
-4. [Dimension 4 — add or remove as needed]
-
-For each dimension: quote specific problematic passages, explain the issue,
-and suggest a concrete improvement.
-
-REFINEMENT:
-Rewrite the output addressing every point of your feedback above.
-Show the refined version only.
+INITIAL OUTPUT:
+[Paste the output to improve, or ask the AI to generate a first draft here]
+
+FEEDBACK DIMENSIONS:
+Review the output above for:
+1. [Dimension 1 — e.g., "Clarity: Are there any ambiguous or hard-to-parse sentences?"]
+2. [Dimension 2 — e.g., "Completeness: What important points are missing?"]
+3. [Dimension 3 — e.g., "Tone: Is the voice appropriate for the audience?"]
+4. [Dimension 4 — add or remove as needed]
+
+For each dimension: quote specific problematic passages, explain the issue,
+and suggest a concrete improvement.
+
+REFINEMENT:
+Rewrite the output addressing every point of your feedback above.
+Show the refined version only.

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/skeleton-of-thought_template.txt

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
-PHASE 1 — SKELETON:
-Generate a skeleton outline for the following topic or question.
-List only the key points — one per line — in this format:
-N. [Point name] | [One-sentence description of what this point covers]
-Do not expand yet. Skeleton only.
-
-TOPIC / QUESTION:
-[Your topic or question]
-
----
-
-PHASE 2 — EXPAND:
-Now expand each skeleton point into [2-4 sentences / a paragraph / detailed coverage].
-Each point should be self-contained and complete.
-[Optional: expand points in parallel by sending each as a separate API call]
+PHASE 1 — SKELETON:
+Generate a skeleton outline for the following topic or question.
+List only the key points — one per line — in this format:
+N. [Point name] | [One-sentence description of what this point covers]
+Do not expand yet. Skeleton only.
+
+TOPIC / QUESTION:
+[Your topic or question]
+
+---
+
+PHASE 2 — EXPAND:
+Now expand each skeleton point into [2-4 sentences / a paragraph / detailed coverage].
+Each point should be self-contained and complete.
+[Optional: expand points in parallel by sending each as a separate API call]

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/step-back_template.txt

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-ORIGINAL QUESTION:
-[The specific question you want answered]
-
-STEP-BACK:
-Before answering directly, first answer this higher-level question:
-[Rephrase the original into a more abstract question about underlying principles, concepts, or rules]
-
-PRINCIPLE APPLICATION:
-Using the principles/concepts you just described, now answer the original question:
-[Restate original question here]
+ORIGINAL QUESTION:
+[The specific question you want answered]
+
+STEP-BACK:
+Before answering directly, first answer this higher-level question:
+[Rephrase the original into a more abstract question about underlying principles, concepts, or rules]
+
+PRINCIPLE APPLICATION:
+Using the principles/concepts you just described, now answer the original question:
+[Restate original question here]

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/tidd-ec_template.txt

@@ -1,45 +1,45 @@
-TASK TYPE:
-[Clear indication of the activity type - e.g., Data Analysis, Customer Support Response, Technical Documentation, Content Translation]
-
-INSTRUCTIONS:
-[Specific steps and guidelines to accomplish the task]
-1. [First step or action]
-2. [Second step or action]
-3. [Continue with methodology and sequence]
-4. [Add more steps as needed...]
-
-DO:
-[Specify actions, language, structures, and information that MUST be included]
-- [Required action or element #1]
-- [Language or tone to use]
-- [Structure or format to follow]
-- [Information that must be present]
-- [Add more as needed...]
-
-DON'T:
-[Highlight actions, elements, or approaches to AVOID]
-- [Error or mistake to prevent #1]
-- [Inappropriate language or approach to avoid]
-- [Common pitfall to prevent]
-- [Limitation or boundary not to cross]
-- [Add more as needed...]
-
-EXAMPLES:
-[Provide concrete examples of desired outcomes]
-
-Example 1 (Good):
-[Detailed example showing desired output, format, tone, and structure]
-
-Example 2 (Optional - Additional Good Example):
-[Another example demonstrating quality and approach]
-
-[Optional] Example 3 (What to Avoid):
-[Counter-example showing what NOT to do, if helpful]
-
-CONTEXT:
-[Background information and user-provided content that affects the task]
-- [Relevant background information]
-- [Business or domain constraints]
-- [User-provided data or content to reference]
-- [Situational factors affecting the task]
-- [Standards or guidelines that apply]
+TASK TYPE:
+[Clear indication of the activity type - e.g., Data Analysis, Customer Support Response, Technical Documentation, Content Translation]
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+[Specific steps and guidelines to accomplish the task]
+1. [First step or action]
+2. [Second step or action]
+3. [Continue with methodology and sequence]
+4. [Add more steps as needed...]
+
+DO:
+[Specify actions, language, structures, and information that MUST be included]
+- [Required action or element #1]
+- [Language or tone to use]
+- [Structure or format to follow]
+- [Information that must be present]
+- [Add more as needed...]
+
+DON'T:
+[Highlight actions, elements, or approaches to AVOID]
+- [Error or mistake to prevent #1]
+- [Inappropriate language or approach to avoid]
+- [Common pitfall to prevent]
+- [Limitation or boundary not to cross]
+- [Add more as needed...]
+
+EXAMPLES:
+[Provide concrete examples of desired outcomes]
+
+Example 1 (Good):
+[Detailed example showing desired output, format, tone, and structure]
+
+Example 2 (Optional - Additional Good Example):
+[Another example demonstrating quality and approach]
+
+[Optional] Example 3 (What to Avoid):
+[Counter-example showing what NOT to do, if helpful]
+
+CONTEXT:
+[Background information and user-provided content that affects the task]
+- [Relevant background information]
+- [Business or domain constraints]
+- [User-provided data or content to reference]
+- [Situational factors affecting the task]
+- [Standards or guidelines that apply]

package/skills/prompt-architect/assets/templates/tree-of-thought_template.txt

@@ -1,30 +1,30 @@
-PROBLEM:
-[Define what needs to be solved:
-- What decision or problem are we addressing?
-- What constraints apply?
-- What does a good solution need to achieve?]
-
-EXPLORE THESE BRANCHES:
-Branch 1: [Name of approach/strategy]
-Branch 2: [Name of approach/strategy]
-Branch 3: [Name of approach/strategy]
-[Add or remove branches as needed — 2 to 5 is optimal]
-
-For each branch, analyze:
-- Describe the approach
-- Work through the core reasoning
-- Identify key strengths
-- Identify key weaknesses or risks
-- Note any edge cases or assumptions
-
-EVALUATION CRITERIA:
-[Define how branches will be compared:
-- What matters most? (list in priority order)
-- Any hard constraints that eliminate certain branches?
-- Is there one best answer, or does it depend on context?]
-
-CONCLUSION:
-[Synthesize the analysis:
-- Select the best branch with clear reasoning
-- OR explain trade-offs if the answer is context-dependent
-- State the single biggest assumption that could change the recommendation]
+PROBLEM:
+[Define what needs to be solved:
+- What decision or problem are we addressing?
+- What constraints apply?
+- What does a good solution need to achieve?]
+
+EXPLORE THESE BRANCHES:
+Branch 1: [Name of approach/strategy]
+Branch 2: [Name of approach/strategy]
+Branch 3: [Name of approach/strategy]
+[Add or remove branches as needed — 2 to 5 is optimal]
+
+For each branch, analyze:
+- Describe the approach
+- Work through the core reasoning
+- Identify key strengths
+- Identify key weaknesses or risks
+- Note any edge cases or assumptions
+
+EVALUATION CRITERIA:
+[Define how branches will be compared:
+- What matters most? (list in priority order)
+- Any hard constraints that eliminate certain branches?
+- Is there one best answer, or does it depend on context?]
+
+CONCLUSION:
+[Synthesize the analysis:
+- Select the best branch with clear reasoning
+- OR explain trade-offs if the answer is context-dependent
+- State the single biggest assumption that could change the recommendation]