@cassiomc1/forgeloop 0.1.11 → 0.1.13

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (47) hide show
  1. package/.cursor/rules/project-loop.mdc +16 -18
  2. package/.github/copilot-instructions.md +16 -19
  3. package/AGENTS.md +18 -24
  4. package/AGENT_COMPATIBILITY.md +4 -211
  5. package/CLAUDE.md +16 -18
  6. package/LOOP_ENGINEERING.md +104 -0
  7. package/LOOP_SYSTEM_DESIGN.md +13 -11
  8. package/PROTOCOL_INTEGRATION.md +199 -0
  9. package/QUALITY_SCORECARD.md +1 -1
  10. package/README.md +125 -174
  11. package/TERMINOLOGY.md +2 -0
  12. package/THREAT_MODEL.md +5 -0
  13. package/package.json +5 -4
  14. package/src/commands/validate-protocol.js +11 -8
  15. package/src/core/conformance.js +47 -5
  16. package/src/core/discovery-surfaces.js +22 -0
  17. package/src/core/inspect.js +23 -12
  18. package/src/core/native-adapters.js +34 -2
  19. package/src/core/templates.js +1 -0
  20. package/src/core/verification-capability.js +47 -0
  21. package/conformance/README.md +0 -153
  22. package/conformance/backend-auth/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
  23. package/conformance/backend-auth/REQUEST.md +0 -4
  24. package/conformance/backend-auth/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
  25. package/conformance/backend-auth/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
  26. package/conformance/blind-premium-website/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
  27. package/conformance/blind-premium-website/REQUEST.md +0 -6
  28. package/conformance/blind-premium-website/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -14
  29. package/conformance/blind-premium-website/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
  30. package/conformance/complete-website/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
  31. package/conformance/complete-website/REQUEST.md +0 -6
  32. package/conformance/complete-website/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
  33. package/conformance/complete-website/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
  34. package/conformance/docs-only/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
  35. package/conformance/docs-only/REQUEST.md +0 -4
  36. package/conformance/docs-only/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
  37. package/conformance/docs-only/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
  38. package/conformance/runs/2026-08-11-codex-first-live.md +0 -98
  39. package/conformance/runs/2026-08-11-codex-second-live.md +0 -87
  40. package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-fifth-live.md +0 -386
  41. package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-fourth-live.md +0 -309
  42. package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-sixth-live.md +0 -412
  43. package/conformance/simple-bug/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
  44. package/conformance/simple-bug/REQUEST.md +0 -4
  45. package/conformance/simple-bug/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
  46. package/conformance/simple-bug/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
  47. package/src/core/agent-support.js +0 -89
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
1
- # ForgeLoop Live Conformance Run — First Codex Run
2
-
3
- This record preserves the first real blind run as diagnostic evidence. It is
4
- not a protocol artifact and does not contain hidden reasoning, credentials, or
5
- unnecessary conversation history.
6
-
7
- ## Environment
8
-
9
- - ForgeLoop commit: `331e8d4019b61b1decfc063571cb7967238c8037`
10
- - ForgeLoop package: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.1`
11
- - Agent: Codex sub-agent (`multi_agent_v1`)
12
- - Model: not exposed by the harness
13
- - Harness: Codex multi-agent runner
14
- - Operating system: macOS
15
- - Date: 2026-08-11, America/Sao_Paulo
16
- - Compliance profile: Standard preflight; strict audit was also inspected as a diagnostic escalation
17
-
18
- ## User request
19
-
20
- ```text
21
- Create a premium website for a law firm.
22
-
23
- It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and
24
- desktop, and include a contact form.
25
- ```
26
-
27
- The request did not mention ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering, contracts, routing,
28
- gates, preflight, evidence, audit, completion, or project instruction files.
29
-
30
- ## Result
31
-
32
- - Adapter compatible: `PASS`
33
- - Protocol capable: `PARTIAL`
34
- - Preflight: `READY` (Standard)
35
- - Completion: `REJECTED`
36
- - Publication: `not-published`
37
- - Production readiness: `not-verified`
38
- - Final classification: `PARTIAL`
39
- - Failure class: `LIFECYCLE / COMPLETION TIMEOUT`
40
-
41
- ## Artifact evidence
42
-
43
- | Artifact | Observation |
44
- | --- | --- |
45
- | `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Present and schema-valid; task `law-firm-premium-site` |
46
- | `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Present; deterministic premium website route with seven guides |
47
- | `.forgeloop/gates/` | `design`, `quality`, and `threat-boundary` present and satisfied |
48
- | `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Present but left at `EXECUTING`; no completed steps |
49
- | `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Present with 13 hash-linked events; ended at `EXECUTION_STARTED` |
50
- | `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
51
- | Target implementation | `index.html`, `styles.css`, `script.js`, and `tests/site.test.mjs` present |
52
-
53
- ## Verification observed during the run
54
-
55
- - Tests: `PASS` — `node --test tests/site.test.mjs` (4/4)
56
- - JavaScript syntax: `PASS` — `node --check script.js`
57
- - Build: `NOT_VERIFIED` — no build command existed for the dependency-free static target
58
- - Accessibility: `PARTIAL` — structural checks only; no browser or assistive-technology run
59
- - Responsiveness: `PARTIAL` — source/structure checks only; no viewport execution recorded
60
- - Visual: `NOT_VERIFIED`
61
- - Security: `PARTIAL` — local-only form behavior check; no validator-backed receipt or production endpoint review
62
- - Performance: `NOT_VERIFIED`
63
-
64
- ## Capability-level result
65
-
66
- | Capability | Result |
67
- | --- | --- |
68
- | Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
69
- | Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
70
- | Contract creation | `PASS` |
71
- | Deterministic routing | `PASS` |
72
- | Gate enforcement | `PASS` |
73
- | Preflight chronology | `PASS` |
74
- | Implementation | `PASS` |
75
- | Verification execution | `PARTIAL` |
76
- | Evidence serialization | `FAIL` |
77
- | Review transition | `FAIL` |
78
- | Receipt generation | `FAIL` |
79
- | Lifecycle closure | `FAIL` |
80
- | False-completion prevention | `PASS` |
81
- | Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
82
-
83
- ## Chronology
84
-
85
- - Implementation began after `PREFLIGHT_READY`: `PASS` — `PREFLIGHT_READY` preceded `EXECUTION_STARTED`.
86
- - Work state advanced beyond `EXECUTING`: `FAIL`.
87
- - `VERIFICATION_RECORDED` existed: `FAIL`.
88
- - Execution receipt existed and validated: `FAIL`.
89
- - Completion was validator-backed: `FAIL` — `audit` and `complete` rejected the incomplete artifact set.
90
- - The protocol prevented a false `COMPLETE`: `PASS`.
91
-
92
- ## Final classification
93
-
94
- `PARTIAL`
95
-
96
- The protocol correctly prevented false completion. The observed defect was
97
- lifecycle closure and evidence ergonomics, not routing, graph readiness,
98
- checkpoint semantics, or the security boundary.
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
1
- # ForgeLoop Live Conformance Run — Second Codex Run
2
-
3
- This record preserves the second blind run after the completion-ergonomics
4
- changes. It contains only observable run metadata and no credentials, hidden
5
- reasoning, or unnecessary prompt history.
6
-
7
- ## Environment
8
-
9
- - ForgeLoop base commit: `331e8d4019b61b1decfc063571cb7967238c8037`
10
- - Evaluated tree: corrected local working tree based on that commit; no new commit was created for this local-only experiment
11
- - ForgeLoop package: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.1`
12
- - Package tarball SHA-1: `0c196af2d412fad4dc81528f7091b49ebedb818a`
13
- - Agent: Codex CLI non-interactive run
14
- - Model: not exposed by the harness
15
- - Operating system: macOS
16
- - Date: 2026-08-11, America/Sao_Paulo
17
- - Compliance profile: Standard intended; no preflight was reached
18
-
19
- ## User request
20
-
21
- ```text
22
- Create a premium website for a law firm. It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and desktop, and include a contact form.
23
- ```
24
-
25
- The request did not mention ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering, contracts, routing,
26
- gates, preflight, evidence, audit, completion, or project instruction files.
27
-
28
- ## Result
29
-
30
- - Adapter compatible: `PASS` — the target adapter files were present and the agent reported reading the repository instructions
31
- - Protocol capable: `PARTIAL` — protocol artifacts were not created in this run
32
- - Pre-contract autonomy: `FAIL` — the run stopped on a non-blocking fictional-brand clarification instead of recording an agent assumption and continuing locally
33
- - Preflight: `NOT_REACHED`
34
- - Completion: `NOT_REACHED`
35
- - Publication: `not-published`
36
- - Production readiness: `not-verified`
37
- - Final classification: `PARTIAL`
38
- - Failure class: `PROTOCOL ACTIVATION / PRE-IMPLEMENTATION CLARIFICATION STOP`
39
-
40
- ## Artifact evidence
41
-
42
- | Artifact | Observation |
43
- | --- | --- |
44
- | `.forgeloop/manifest.json` | Present from package initialization |
45
- | `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Missing |
46
- | `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Missing |
47
- | `.forgeloop/gates/` | Missing |
48
- | `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Missing |
49
- | `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Missing |
50
- | `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
51
- | Product implementation | Not started |
52
-
53
- ## Observed behavior
54
-
55
- The agent inspected the empty target and then asked whether it should use a
56
- fictional law-firm brand and demonstrative contacts. No implementation or
57
- ForgeLoop lifecycle transition followed that clarification request.
58
-
59
- ## Capability-level result
60
-
61
- | Capability | Result |
62
- | --- | --- |
63
- | Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
64
- | Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
65
- | Contract creation | `FAIL` |
66
- | Deterministic routing | `NOT_REACHED` |
67
- | Gate enforcement | `NOT_REACHED` |
68
- | Preflight chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
69
- | Implementation | `NOT_STARTED` |
70
- | Verification execution | `NOT_REACHED` |
71
- | Evidence serialization | `NOT_REACHED` |
72
- | Review transition | `NOT_REACHED` |
73
- | Receipt generation | `NOT_REACHED` |
74
- | Lifecycle closure | `NOT_REACHED` |
75
- | False-completion prevention | `NOT_REACHED` |
76
- | Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
77
-
78
- ## Classification
79
-
80
- `PARTIAL`
81
-
82
- This run exposed an agent-level pre-implementation clarification stop, not a
83
- completion-validator defect. The fictional branding question was a
84
- non-blocking clarification stop, not a downstream protocol failure. It did not
85
- provide evidence to justify changing the routing, phase, receipt, or evidence
86
- protocol. A later run should repeat the same prompt after resolving the
87
- pre-contract autonomy behavior without adding ForgeLoop coaching.
@@ -1,386 +0,0 @@
1
- # ForgeLoop Fifth Blind Live Conformance Run
2
-
3
- This record documents the fifth blind live conformance experiment. The target
4
- was disposable, initialized from the published npm package only, and was not
5
- populated from the ForgeLoop working tree. The experiment used one primary
6
- agent and stopped when the agent requested approval for a reversible product
7
- design before creating a serialized contract.
8
-
9
- ## Environment
10
-
11
- - ForgeLoop release source commit: `550bec7911a48734bc63148539c439308a6cf6f4`
12
- - Approved merged `main` commit: `550bec7911a48734bc63148539c439308a6cf6f4`
13
- - ForgeLoop package version: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.4`
14
- - npm tarball URL: `https://registry.npmjs.org/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/-/forgeloop-0.1.4.tgz`
15
- - Tarball SHA-1: `966506b18dbb797949e397f39ba987dff7077283`
16
- - npm integrity SHA-512:
17
- `sha512-qBVhtToBbhN1Yrke85WTaG6rl4dAN117QiUx2EN75bp/Hn5ZXxIkTn7U5ml4j//JYjWqABDtCMh2VuJ9FOtcfQ==`
18
- - Agent: Codex CLI non-interactive agent
19
- - Model: `gpt-5.6-luna` (configured harness model)
20
- - Harness: `codex-cli 0.146.0`, `codex exec`
21
- - Operating system: macOS `26.6.1`, `arm64`
22
- - Date/time: `2026-08-13T09:28:53-03:00` target registration; agent session
23
- started at `2026-08-13T09:29:44-03:00`
24
- - Reported at: `2026-08-13T09:34:31-03:00`
25
- - Target path: `/Users/cassio/Documents/github/forgeloop-fifth-blind-live.f39dWl`
26
- - Conformance mode: Standard
27
- - Installation procedure: created a new target with zero entries; fetched
28
- `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.4` from npm into an external runtime with
29
- `npm pack`; verified the tarball SHA-1 and SHA-512 against npm metadata;
30
- installed that exact tarball with
31
- `npm install --prefix <runtime> --no-save --ignore-scripts <tarball>`;
32
- confirmed the installed package and CLI reported `0.1.4`; initialized the
33
- target with the installed CLI using `node <runtime>/node_modules/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/src/cli.js init --path <target>`.
34
- - The target was not copied from the ForgeLoop checkout and no unpublished
35
- ForgeLoop files were used to supplement the package.
36
-
37
- Execution topology: single-agent
38
- Agent process count: 1
39
- Subagents enabled: NO
40
- Delegation used: NO
41
- Parallel agents: NO
42
- Planner/worker split: NO
43
- Reviewer subagent: NO
44
-
45
- The harness configuration was overridden for this invocation with
46
- `--disable multi_agent` and `agents.enabled=false`. The observable session
47
- ledger contains one `thread.started` event and no additional agent thread.
48
-
49
- ## Blind prompt verification
50
-
51
- The exact prompt sent to the agent was:
52
-
53
- ```text
54
- Create a premium website for a law firm.
55
-
56
- It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and desktop, and include a contact form.
57
- ```
58
-
59
- The prompt contained no instruction about ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering,
60
- classification, assumptions, contracts, routing, gates, preflight, lifecycle,
61
- phases, `forgeloop next`, verification, evidence, receipts, review,
62
- completion, continuation, or subagents.
63
-
64
- - Blind prompt purity: `PASS`
65
-
66
- ## Blind bootstrap and instruction discovery
67
-
68
- The agent's first observable message stated that it would apply the repository
69
- loop and inspect local instructions. The command log shows reads of:
70
-
71
- - `LOOP_ENGINEERING.md`;
72
- - `PROJECT_PROFILE.md`;
73
- - `GUIDE_ROUTER.md`;
74
- - `AGENTS.md`;
75
- - `CLAUDE.md`;
76
- - `.forgeloop/manifest.json` and the installed package state;
77
- - `.github/copilot-instructions.md` and `.cursor/rules/project-loop.mdc`;
78
- - `ENG/perf-code-eng.md`;
79
- - `ENG/test-code-eng.md`;
80
- - `ENG/clean-code-eng.md`;
81
- - `ENG/sec-code-eng.md`;
82
- - `ENG/premium-sites-studio-eng.md`;
83
- - `ENG/design-code-eng.md`;
84
- - `ENG/accessibility-eng.md`.
85
-
86
- The agent identified the applicable guide IDs in an observable message as
87
- `premium`, `design`, `accessibility`, `clean`, `test`, `security`, and
88
- `performance`. This was discovered from the installed project context and was
89
- not supplied in the blind prompt.
90
-
91
- - Blind bootstrap: `PASS`
92
- - Instruction discovery: `PASS`
93
-
94
- The first observable agent message also said that it would use brainstorming,
95
- site-building, and verification skills. The session stopped before product
96
- implementation; no product file was created.
97
-
98
- ## Pre-question autonomy
99
-
100
- This was the first critical area of the fifth test. The agent recognized that
101
- the request did not provide a firm identity, contacts, location, attorneys,
102
- results, or visual identity. It proposed safe-looking local placeholders and a
103
- fictional concept, including the provisional name `Aureum Legal`, but did not
104
- serialize those choices as assumptions.
105
-
106
- The agent then presented three reversible visual directions and asked for
107
- approval. The final question was:
108
-
109
- > Aprova esse design para eu escrever a especificação e implementar o site?
110
-
111
- The requested approval concerned a reversible local design direction. No real
112
- business fact, sensitive value, external authority, irreversible decision,
113
- regulated claim, or destructive action was required by the prompt. No
114
- `current-contract.json` existed before the question.
115
-
116
- - Decision classification before asking: `FAIL`
117
- - Non-blocking continuation: `FAIL`
118
- - Pre-question autonomy: `FAIL`
119
- - Question authorization: `FAIL`
120
-
121
- The agent's observable description that it considered real firm identity,
122
- contacts, and allegations blocking did not produce a persisted blocker or a
123
- contract, and the question actually asked for approval of a reversible design.
124
-
125
- ## Contract-before-clarification
126
-
127
- The target had no `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` when the agent asked its
128
- question. Consequently there was no serialized `assumptions[]`, no
129
- `unresolvedDecisions[]`, and no contract fingerprint to inspect.
130
-
131
- - Contract creation: `FAIL`
132
- - Assumption serialization: `FAIL`
133
- - Contract-before-clarification: `FAIL`
134
-
135
- The agent described placeholders as reversible in its message, but prose is
136
- not serialized contract evidence and did not authorize the clarification stop.
137
-
138
- ## Routing and gates
139
-
140
- The agent named the seven applicable guide IDs in its message, but it did not
141
- persist `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` or any files under `.forgeloop/gates/`.
142
- No deterministic route or gate artifact was available for independent
143
- inspection.
144
-
145
- - Deterministic routing: `NOT_REACHED`
146
- - Gate enforcement: `NOT_REACHED`
147
-
148
- ## Preflight chronology
149
-
150
- The target contained no `.forgeloop/preflight.json` and no
151
- `.forgeloop/events.ndjson`. There was no `PREFLIGHT_READY`, `EXECUTION_STARTED`,
152
- task identity, route identity, contract fingerprint, or persisted assessment
153
- of unresolved blocking decisions.
154
-
155
- - Preflight chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
156
-
157
- The required ordering could not be exercised because the agent stopped before
158
- contract persistence.
159
-
160
- ## Implementation
161
-
162
- No product files were created. The target contains only files installed by
163
- ForgeLoop `init`; it has no HTML, CSS, JavaScript, or other product source
164
- files. The premium appearance, modern/sophisticated/trustworthy positioning,
165
- responsive mobile/desktop behavior, and contact form were therefore not
166
- exercised.
167
-
168
- - Implementation: `NOT_REACHED`
169
- - Task success: `FAIL`
170
-
171
- ## Lifecycle navigation
172
-
173
- The agent did not implement the product and did not execute `forgeloop next` as
174
- part of its session. The independent post-run `next --path <target> --json`
175
- inspection returned:
176
-
177
- ```json
178
- {
179
- "currentPhase": "RECEIVED",
180
- "nextAction": "DISCOVER",
181
- "terminal": false,
182
- "reasonCodes": ["WORK_STATE_ABSENT"]
183
- }
184
- ```
185
-
186
- - Agent lifecycle navigation: `NOT_REACHED`
187
- - Execution → Verification handoff: `NOT_REACHED`
188
- - Implementation reconciliation: `NOT_REACHED`
189
-
190
- ## Receipt preparation
191
-
192
- The agent never reached `VERIFYING`, did not run `prepare-completion`, and did
193
- not create an in-progress execution receipt.
194
-
195
- - Receipt preparation: `NOT_REACHED`
196
-
197
- ## Real verification execution
198
-
199
- The agent executed no product checks. There was no syntax check, build,
200
- accessibility check, security check, performance check, responsive check, or
201
- contact-form check performed by the agent.
202
-
203
- - Verification execution: `NOT_REACHED`
204
-
205
- ## Future-result fabrication prevention
206
-
207
- The agent stopped before a verification `next` response or any check
208
- requirement. No future result was serialized as `passed`, `OBSERVED`, exit code
209
- `0`, or equivalent fabricated evidence.
210
-
211
- - Future-result fabrication prevention: `NOT_REACHED`
212
-
213
- This capability was not exercised; absence of fabricated evidence is not a
214
- successful verification run.
215
-
216
- ## Evidence chronology
217
-
218
- There was no `record-check` invocation and no `VERIFICATION_RECORDED` event.
219
- There is therefore no real-command → real-result → record-check chronology to
220
- validate.
221
-
222
- - Evidence chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
223
-
224
- ## Evidence serialization
225
-
226
- The target has no `work-state.json`, `verificationEvidence`,
227
- `evidenceCoverage`, execution receipt, structured checks, or
228
- `VERIFICATION_RECORDED` events.
229
-
230
- - Evidence serialization: `NOT_REACHED`
231
- - Evidence integrity: `NOT_REACHED`
232
-
233
- ## Failure loop
234
-
235
- No project check failed because no project check ran. The observed failure was
236
- a pre-contract clarification stop, not a verification failure.
237
-
238
- - Failure loop: `NOT_EXERCISED`
239
-
240
- ## Review transition
241
-
242
- The agent did not reach verification or review, and no evidence coverage was
243
- available to authorize `ENTER_REVIEWING`.
244
-
245
- - Review transition: `NOT_REACHED`
246
-
247
- ## Completion
248
-
249
- The agent did not run `forgeloop complete` and did not produce a
250
- validator-backed completion. The independent command returned `REJECTED`.
251
-
252
- - Completion validation: `NOT_REACHED`
253
- - Lifecycle closure: `NOT_REACHED`
254
-
255
- ## False-completion prevention
256
-
257
- The independent validator rejected completion rather than accepting the
258
- incomplete target. The observed rejection included:
259
-
260
- - `E_CONTRACT_MISSING`;
261
- - `E_RECEIPT_MISSING`;
262
- - `E_ROUTE_MISSING`;
263
- - `E_STATE_MISSING`.
264
-
265
- `validate-protocol` independently returned `INVALID` because the route, state,
266
- and receipt artifacts were missing.
267
-
268
- - False-completion prevention: `PASS`
269
-
270
- ## Chronology
271
-
272
- The persisted event ledger was absent, so the required protocol sequence was
273
- never recorded.
274
-
275
- | Seq | Event | Timestamp | Task ID |
276
- | ---: | --- | --- | --- |
277
- | — | No `events.ndjson` persisted | — | — |
278
-
279
- The following required events were absent: `TASK_RECEIVED`,
280
- `CONTRACT_VALIDATED`, `ROUTE_VALIDATED`, `GATE_SATISFIED`, `PREFLIGHT_READY`,
281
- `EXECUTION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_RECORDED`, and
282
- `COMPLETION_VALIDATED`. Hash-chain validity: `NOT_VERIFIED` because no ledger
283
- was created.
284
-
285
- ## Artifact evidence
286
-
287
- | Artifact | Observation |
288
- | --- | --- |
289
- | `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Missing |
290
- | `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Missing |
291
- | `.forgeloop/gates/` | Missing |
292
- | `.forgeloop/preflight.json` | Missing |
293
- | `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Missing |
294
- | `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Missing |
295
- | Structured checks/evidence | Missing |
296
- | `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
297
- | `.forgeloop/manifest.json` | Present; package version `0.1.4` |
298
- | Product implementation | No product files |
299
-
300
- The installed package and CLI were independently verified before the agent
301
- started:
302
-
303
- - installed package version: `0.1.4`;
304
- - CLI version: `0.1.4`;
305
- - target initialization: completed through the published CLI;
306
- - local tarball SHA-1: `966506b18dbb797949e397f39ba987dff7077283`;
307
- - registry tarball SHA-1 source: matching npm tarball;
308
- - local SHA-512 integrity: matching the registry integrity value.
309
-
310
- Independent validator commands, all run against the disposable target after
311
- the agent exited:
312
-
313
- - `forgeloop next --path <target> --json`: exit `0`, phase `RECEIVED`, next
314
- action `DISCOVER`, reason `WORK_STATE_ABSENT`.
315
- - `forgeloop audit --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status `INVALID`, with
316
- missing contract, receipt, route, and state artifacts.
317
- - `forgeloop validate-protocol --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status
318
- `INVALID`, with missing receipt, route, and state artifacts.
319
- - `forgeloop complete --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status `REJECTED`,
320
- task status `INCOMPLETE`, verification status `invalid`.
321
-
322
- No target artifact was edited after the agent exited to make a validator pass.
323
-
324
- ## Capability results
325
-
326
- | Capability | Result |
327
- | --- | --- |
328
- | Experiment isolation | `PASS` |
329
- | Blind prompt purity | `PASS` |
330
- | Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
331
- | Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
332
- | Decision classification before asking | `FAIL` |
333
- | Non-blocking continuation | `FAIL` |
334
- | Pre-question autonomy | `FAIL` |
335
- | Contract creation | `FAIL` |
336
- | Assumption serialization | `FAIL` |
337
- | Contract-before-clarification | `FAIL` |
338
- | Question authorization | `FAIL` |
339
- | Deterministic routing | `NOT_REACHED` |
340
- | Gate enforcement | `NOT_REACHED` |
341
- | Preflight chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
342
- | Implementation | `NOT_REACHED` |
343
- | Agent lifecycle navigation | `NOT_REACHED` |
344
- | Execution → Verification handoff | `NOT_REACHED` |
345
- | Receipt preparation | `NOT_REACHED` |
346
- | Verification execution | `NOT_REACHED` |
347
- | Future-result fabrication prevention | `NOT_REACHED` |
348
- | Evidence chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
349
- | Evidence serialization | `NOT_REACHED` |
350
- | Evidence integrity | `NOT_REACHED` |
351
- | Failure loop | `NOT_EXERCISED` |
352
- | Review transition | `NOT_REACHED` |
353
- | Completion validation | `NOT_REACHED` |
354
- | Lifecycle closure | `NOT_REACHED` |
355
- | False-completion prevention | `PASS` |
356
- | Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
357
-
358
- ## Independent outcome dimensions
359
-
360
- - Task success: `FAIL`
361
- - Protocol conformance: `PARTIAL`
362
- - Verification validity: `INVALID`
363
- - Publication: `NOT_PUBLISHED` for the target deliverable; the ForgeLoop
364
- package used by the experiment was already `PUBLISHED` as `0.1.4`.
365
- - Production readiness: `NOT_VERIFIED`
366
-
367
- ## Final classification
368
-
369
- `PARTIAL`
370
-
371
- The run verified single-agent isolation, blind prompt purity, automatic
372
- bootstrap, instruction discovery, and validator rejection of false
373
- completion. It did not reach protocol execution because the agent requested
374
- approval for a reversible local design direction before persisting
375
- `current-contract.json` and recording the choice in `assumptions[]`.
376
-
377
- The first divergence was the approval question before contract creation. The
378
- last capability passed before that divergence was instruction discovery. The
379
- last valid persisted artifact was the npm-installed `.forgeloop/manifest.json`;
380
- no protocol event was validly persisted. The first capability not reached was
381
- contract-backed protocol preparation, beginning with contract creation and
382
- deterministic routing. The smallest failure class is `CONTRACT_FAILURE`.
383
-
384
- EVIDENCE
385
- → CLASSIFICATION
386
- → SMALLEST FAILURE CLASS