@cassiomc1/forgeloop 0.1.11 → 0.1.13
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.cursor/rules/project-loop.mdc +16 -18
- package/.github/copilot-instructions.md +16 -19
- package/AGENTS.md +18 -24
- package/AGENT_COMPATIBILITY.md +4 -211
- package/CLAUDE.md +16 -18
- package/LOOP_ENGINEERING.md +104 -0
- package/LOOP_SYSTEM_DESIGN.md +13 -11
- package/PROTOCOL_INTEGRATION.md +199 -0
- package/QUALITY_SCORECARD.md +1 -1
- package/README.md +125 -174
- package/TERMINOLOGY.md +2 -0
- package/THREAT_MODEL.md +5 -0
- package/package.json +5 -4
- package/src/commands/validate-protocol.js +11 -8
- package/src/core/conformance.js +47 -5
- package/src/core/discovery-surfaces.js +22 -0
- package/src/core/inspect.js +23 -12
- package/src/core/native-adapters.js +34 -2
- package/src/core/templates.js +1 -0
- package/src/core/verification-capability.js +47 -0
- package/conformance/README.md +0 -153
- package/conformance/backend-auth/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
- package/conformance/backend-auth/REQUEST.md +0 -4
- package/conformance/backend-auth/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/backend-auth/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/blind-premium-website/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
- package/conformance/blind-premium-website/REQUEST.md +0 -6
- package/conformance/blind-premium-website/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -14
- package/conformance/blind-premium-website/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/complete-website/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
- package/conformance/complete-website/REQUEST.md +0 -6
- package/conformance/complete-website/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/complete-website/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/docs-only/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
- package/conformance/docs-only/REQUEST.md +0 -4
- package/conformance/docs-only/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/docs-only/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/runs/2026-08-11-codex-first-live.md +0 -98
- package/conformance/runs/2026-08-11-codex-second-live.md +0 -87
- package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-fifth-live.md +0 -386
- package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-fourth-live.md +0 -309
- package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-sixth-live.md +0 -412
- package/conformance/simple-bug/EXPECTED_ROUTE.json +0 -7
- package/conformance/simple-bug/REQUEST.md +0 -4
- package/conformance/simple-bug/REQUIRED_EVIDENCE.json +0 -3
- package/conformance/simple-bug/REQUIRED_GATES.json +0 -3
- package/src/core/agent-support.js +0 -89
|
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# ForgeLoop Live Conformance Run — First Codex Run
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
This record preserves the first real blind run as diagnostic evidence. It is
|
|
4
|
-
not a protocol artifact and does not contain hidden reasoning, credentials, or
|
|
5
|
-
unnecessary conversation history.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## Environment
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
- ForgeLoop commit: `331e8d4019b61b1decfc063571cb7967238c8037`
|
|
10
|
-
- ForgeLoop package: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.1`
|
|
11
|
-
- Agent: Codex sub-agent (`multi_agent_v1`)
|
|
12
|
-
- Model: not exposed by the harness
|
|
13
|
-
- Harness: Codex multi-agent runner
|
|
14
|
-
- Operating system: macOS
|
|
15
|
-
- Date: 2026-08-11, America/Sao_Paulo
|
|
16
|
-
- Compliance profile: Standard preflight; strict audit was also inspected as a diagnostic escalation
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## User request
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
```text
|
|
21
|
-
Create a premium website for a law firm.
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and
|
|
24
|
-
desktop, and include a contact form.
|
|
25
|
-
```
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
The request did not mention ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering, contracts, routing,
|
|
28
|
-
gates, preflight, evidence, audit, completion, or project instruction files.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Result
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
- Adapter compatible: `PASS`
|
|
33
|
-
- Protocol capable: `PARTIAL`
|
|
34
|
-
- Preflight: `READY` (Standard)
|
|
35
|
-
- Completion: `REJECTED`
|
|
36
|
-
- Publication: `not-published`
|
|
37
|
-
- Production readiness: `not-verified`
|
|
38
|
-
- Final classification: `PARTIAL`
|
|
39
|
-
- Failure class: `LIFECYCLE / COMPLETION TIMEOUT`
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## Artifact evidence
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
| Artifact | Observation |
|
|
44
|
-
| --- | --- |
|
|
45
|
-
| `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Present and schema-valid; task `law-firm-premium-site` |
|
|
46
|
-
| `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Present; deterministic premium website route with seven guides |
|
|
47
|
-
| `.forgeloop/gates/` | `design`, `quality`, and `threat-boundary` present and satisfied |
|
|
48
|
-
| `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Present but left at `EXECUTING`; no completed steps |
|
|
49
|
-
| `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Present with 13 hash-linked events; ended at `EXECUTION_STARTED` |
|
|
50
|
-
| `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
|
|
51
|
-
| Target implementation | `index.html`, `styles.css`, `script.js`, and `tests/site.test.mjs` present |
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
## Verification observed during the run
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
- Tests: `PASS` — `node --test tests/site.test.mjs` (4/4)
|
|
56
|
-
- JavaScript syntax: `PASS` — `node --check script.js`
|
|
57
|
-
- Build: `NOT_VERIFIED` — no build command existed for the dependency-free static target
|
|
58
|
-
- Accessibility: `PARTIAL` — structural checks only; no browser or assistive-technology run
|
|
59
|
-
- Responsiveness: `PARTIAL` — source/structure checks only; no viewport execution recorded
|
|
60
|
-
- Visual: `NOT_VERIFIED`
|
|
61
|
-
- Security: `PARTIAL` — local-only form behavior check; no validator-backed receipt or production endpoint review
|
|
62
|
-
- Performance: `NOT_VERIFIED`
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
## Capability-level result
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
| Capability | Result |
|
|
67
|
-
| --- | --- |
|
|
68
|
-
| Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
|
|
69
|
-
| Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
|
|
70
|
-
| Contract creation | `PASS` |
|
|
71
|
-
| Deterministic routing | `PASS` |
|
|
72
|
-
| Gate enforcement | `PASS` |
|
|
73
|
-
| Preflight chronology | `PASS` |
|
|
74
|
-
| Implementation | `PASS` |
|
|
75
|
-
| Verification execution | `PARTIAL` |
|
|
76
|
-
| Evidence serialization | `FAIL` |
|
|
77
|
-
| Review transition | `FAIL` |
|
|
78
|
-
| Receipt generation | `FAIL` |
|
|
79
|
-
| Lifecycle closure | `FAIL` |
|
|
80
|
-
| False-completion prevention | `PASS` |
|
|
81
|
-
| Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
## Chronology
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
- Implementation began after `PREFLIGHT_READY`: `PASS` — `PREFLIGHT_READY` preceded `EXECUTION_STARTED`.
|
|
86
|
-
- Work state advanced beyond `EXECUTING`: `FAIL`.
|
|
87
|
-
- `VERIFICATION_RECORDED` existed: `FAIL`.
|
|
88
|
-
- Execution receipt existed and validated: `FAIL`.
|
|
89
|
-
- Completion was validator-backed: `FAIL` — `audit` and `complete` rejected the incomplete artifact set.
|
|
90
|
-
- The protocol prevented a false `COMPLETE`: `PASS`.
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
## Final classification
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
`PARTIAL`
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
The protocol correctly prevented false completion. The observed defect was
|
|
97
|
-
lifecycle closure and evidence ergonomics, not routing, graph readiness,
|
|
98
|
-
checkpoint semantics, or the security boundary.
|
|
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# ForgeLoop Live Conformance Run — Second Codex Run
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
This record preserves the second blind run after the completion-ergonomics
|
|
4
|
-
changes. It contains only observable run metadata and no credentials, hidden
|
|
5
|
-
reasoning, or unnecessary prompt history.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## Environment
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
- ForgeLoop base commit: `331e8d4019b61b1decfc063571cb7967238c8037`
|
|
10
|
-
- Evaluated tree: corrected local working tree based on that commit; no new commit was created for this local-only experiment
|
|
11
|
-
- ForgeLoop package: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.1`
|
|
12
|
-
- Package tarball SHA-1: `0c196af2d412fad4dc81528f7091b49ebedb818a`
|
|
13
|
-
- Agent: Codex CLI non-interactive run
|
|
14
|
-
- Model: not exposed by the harness
|
|
15
|
-
- Operating system: macOS
|
|
16
|
-
- Date: 2026-08-11, America/Sao_Paulo
|
|
17
|
-
- Compliance profile: Standard intended; no preflight was reached
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## User request
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
```text
|
|
22
|
-
Create a premium website for a law firm. It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and desktop, and include a contact form.
|
|
23
|
-
```
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
The request did not mention ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering, contracts, routing,
|
|
26
|
-
gates, preflight, evidence, audit, completion, or project instruction files.
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
## Result
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
- Adapter compatible: `PASS` — the target adapter files were present and the agent reported reading the repository instructions
|
|
31
|
-
- Protocol capable: `PARTIAL` — protocol artifacts were not created in this run
|
|
32
|
-
- Pre-contract autonomy: `FAIL` — the run stopped on a non-blocking fictional-brand clarification instead of recording an agent assumption and continuing locally
|
|
33
|
-
- Preflight: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
34
|
-
- Completion: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
35
|
-
- Publication: `not-published`
|
|
36
|
-
- Production readiness: `not-verified`
|
|
37
|
-
- Final classification: `PARTIAL`
|
|
38
|
-
- Failure class: `PROTOCOL ACTIVATION / PRE-IMPLEMENTATION CLARIFICATION STOP`
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
## Artifact evidence
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
| Artifact | Observation |
|
|
43
|
-
| --- | --- |
|
|
44
|
-
| `.forgeloop/manifest.json` | Present from package initialization |
|
|
45
|
-
| `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Missing |
|
|
46
|
-
| `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Missing |
|
|
47
|
-
| `.forgeloop/gates/` | Missing |
|
|
48
|
-
| `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Missing |
|
|
49
|
-
| `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Missing |
|
|
50
|
-
| `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
|
|
51
|
-
| Product implementation | Not started |
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
## Observed behavior
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
The agent inspected the empty target and then asked whether it should use a
|
|
56
|
-
fictional law-firm brand and demonstrative contacts. No implementation or
|
|
57
|
-
ForgeLoop lifecycle transition followed that clarification request.
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
## Capability-level result
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
| Capability | Result |
|
|
62
|
-
| --- | --- |
|
|
63
|
-
| Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
|
|
64
|
-
| Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
|
|
65
|
-
| Contract creation | `FAIL` |
|
|
66
|
-
| Deterministic routing | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
67
|
-
| Gate enforcement | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
68
|
-
| Preflight chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
69
|
-
| Implementation | `NOT_STARTED` |
|
|
70
|
-
| Verification execution | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
71
|
-
| Evidence serialization | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
72
|
-
| Review transition | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
73
|
-
| Receipt generation | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
74
|
-
| Lifecycle closure | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
75
|
-
| False-completion prevention | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
76
|
-
| Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
## Classification
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
`PARTIAL`
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
This run exposed an agent-level pre-implementation clarification stop, not a
|
|
83
|
-
completion-validator defect. The fictional branding question was a
|
|
84
|
-
non-blocking clarification stop, not a downstream protocol failure. It did not
|
|
85
|
-
provide evidence to justify changing the routing, phase, receipt, or evidence
|
|
86
|
-
protocol. A later run should repeat the same prompt after resolving the
|
|
87
|
-
pre-contract autonomy behavior without adding ForgeLoop coaching.
|
|
@@ -1,386 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# ForgeLoop Fifth Blind Live Conformance Run
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
This record documents the fifth blind live conformance experiment. The target
|
|
4
|
-
was disposable, initialized from the published npm package only, and was not
|
|
5
|
-
populated from the ForgeLoop working tree. The experiment used one primary
|
|
6
|
-
agent and stopped when the agent requested approval for a reversible product
|
|
7
|
-
design before creating a serialized contract.
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## Environment
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
- ForgeLoop release source commit: `550bec7911a48734bc63148539c439308a6cf6f4`
|
|
12
|
-
- Approved merged `main` commit: `550bec7911a48734bc63148539c439308a6cf6f4`
|
|
13
|
-
- ForgeLoop package version: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.4`
|
|
14
|
-
- npm tarball URL: `https://registry.npmjs.org/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/-/forgeloop-0.1.4.tgz`
|
|
15
|
-
- Tarball SHA-1: `966506b18dbb797949e397f39ba987dff7077283`
|
|
16
|
-
- npm integrity SHA-512:
|
|
17
|
-
`sha512-qBVhtToBbhN1Yrke85WTaG6rl4dAN117QiUx2EN75bp/Hn5ZXxIkTn7U5ml4j//JYjWqABDtCMh2VuJ9FOtcfQ==`
|
|
18
|
-
- Agent: Codex CLI non-interactive agent
|
|
19
|
-
- Model: `gpt-5.6-luna` (configured harness model)
|
|
20
|
-
- Harness: `codex-cli 0.146.0`, `codex exec`
|
|
21
|
-
- Operating system: macOS `26.6.1`, `arm64`
|
|
22
|
-
- Date/time: `2026-08-13T09:28:53-03:00` target registration; agent session
|
|
23
|
-
started at `2026-08-13T09:29:44-03:00`
|
|
24
|
-
- Reported at: `2026-08-13T09:34:31-03:00`
|
|
25
|
-
- Target path: `/Users/cassio/Documents/github/forgeloop-fifth-blind-live.f39dWl`
|
|
26
|
-
- Conformance mode: Standard
|
|
27
|
-
- Installation procedure: created a new target with zero entries; fetched
|
|
28
|
-
`@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.4` from npm into an external runtime with
|
|
29
|
-
`npm pack`; verified the tarball SHA-1 and SHA-512 against npm metadata;
|
|
30
|
-
installed that exact tarball with
|
|
31
|
-
`npm install --prefix <runtime> --no-save --ignore-scripts <tarball>`;
|
|
32
|
-
confirmed the installed package and CLI reported `0.1.4`; initialized the
|
|
33
|
-
target with the installed CLI using `node <runtime>/node_modules/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/src/cli.js init --path <target>`.
|
|
34
|
-
- The target was not copied from the ForgeLoop checkout and no unpublished
|
|
35
|
-
ForgeLoop files were used to supplement the package.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
Execution topology: single-agent
|
|
38
|
-
Agent process count: 1
|
|
39
|
-
Subagents enabled: NO
|
|
40
|
-
Delegation used: NO
|
|
41
|
-
Parallel agents: NO
|
|
42
|
-
Planner/worker split: NO
|
|
43
|
-
Reviewer subagent: NO
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
The harness configuration was overridden for this invocation with
|
|
46
|
-
`--disable multi_agent` and `agents.enabled=false`. The observable session
|
|
47
|
-
ledger contains one `thread.started` event and no additional agent thread.
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
## Blind prompt verification
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
The exact prompt sent to the agent was:
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
```text
|
|
54
|
-
Create a premium website for a law firm.
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and desktop, and include a contact form.
|
|
57
|
-
```
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
The prompt contained no instruction about ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering,
|
|
60
|
-
classification, assumptions, contracts, routing, gates, preflight, lifecycle,
|
|
61
|
-
phases, `forgeloop next`, verification, evidence, receipts, review,
|
|
62
|
-
completion, continuation, or subagents.
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
- Blind prompt purity: `PASS`
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
## Blind bootstrap and instruction discovery
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
The agent's first observable message stated that it would apply the repository
|
|
69
|
-
loop and inspect local instructions. The command log shows reads of:
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
- `LOOP_ENGINEERING.md`;
|
|
72
|
-
- `PROJECT_PROFILE.md`;
|
|
73
|
-
- `GUIDE_ROUTER.md`;
|
|
74
|
-
- `AGENTS.md`;
|
|
75
|
-
- `CLAUDE.md`;
|
|
76
|
-
- `.forgeloop/manifest.json` and the installed package state;
|
|
77
|
-
- `.github/copilot-instructions.md` and `.cursor/rules/project-loop.mdc`;
|
|
78
|
-
- `ENG/perf-code-eng.md`;
|
|
79
|
-
- `ENG/test-code-eng.md`;
|
|
80
|
-
- `ENG/clean-code-eng.md`;
|
|
81
|
-
- `ENG/sec-code-eng.md`;
|
|
82
|
-
- `ENG/premium-sites-studio-eng.md`;
|
|
83
|
-
- `ENG/design-code-eng.md`;
|
|
84
|
-
- `ENG/accessibility-eng.md`.
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
The agent identified the applicable guide IDs in an observable message as
|
|
87
|
-
`premium`, `design`, `accessibility`, `clean`, `test`, `security`, and
|
|
88
|
-
`performance`. This was discovered from the installed project context and was
|
|
89
|
-
not supplied in the blind prompt.
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
- Blind bootstrap: `PASS`
|
|
92
|
-
- Instruction discovery: `PASS`
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
The first observable agent message also said that it would use brainstorming,
|
|
95
|
-
site-building, and verification skills. The session stopped before product
|
|
96
|
-
implementation; no product file was created.
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
## Pre-question autonomy
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
This was the first critical area of the fifth test. The agent recognized that
|
|
101
|
-
the request did not provide a firm identity, contacts, location, attorneys,
|
|
102
|
-
results, or visual identity. It proposed safe-looking local placeholders and a
|
|
103
|
-
fictional concept, including the provisional name `Aureum Legal`, but did not
|
|
104
|
-
serialize those choices as assumptions.
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
The agent then presented three reversible visual directions and asked for
|
|
107
|
-
approval. The final question was:
|
|
108
|
-
|
|
109
|
-
> Aprova esse design para eu escrever a especificação e implementar o site?
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
111
|
-
The requested approval concerned a reversible local design direction. No real
|
|
112
|
-
business fact, sensitive value, external authority, irreversible decision,
|
|
113
|
-
regulated claim, or destructive action was required by the prompt. No
|
|
114
|
-
`current-contract.json` existed before the question.
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
- Decision classification before asking: `FAIL`
|
|
117
|
-
- Non-blocking continuation: `FAIL`
|
|
118
|
-
- Pre-question autonomy: `FAIL`
|
|
119
|
-
- Question authorization: `FAIL`
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
The agent's observable description that it considered real firm identity,
|
|
122
|
-
contacts, and allegations blocking did not produce a persisted blocker or a
|
|
123
|
-
contract, and the question actually asked for approval of a reversible design.
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
## Contract-before-clarification
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
The target had no `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` when the agent asked its
|
|
128
|
-
question. Consequently there was no serialized `assumptions[]`, no
|
|
129
|
-
`unresolvedDecisions[]`, and no contract fingerprint to inspect.
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
- Contract creation: `FAIL`
|
|
132
|
-
- Assumption serialization: `FAIL`
|
|
133
|
-
- Contract-before-clarification: `FAIL`
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
The agent described placeholders as reversible in its message, but prose is
|
|
136
|
-
not serialized contract evidence and did not authorize the clarification stop.
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
## Routing and gates
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
140
|
-
The agent named the seven applicable guide IDs in its message, but it did not
|
|
141
|
-
persist `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` or any files under `.forgeloop/gates/`.
|
|
142
|
-
No deterministic route or gate artifact was available for independent
|
|
143
|
-
inspection.
|
|
144
|
-
|
|
145
|
-
- Deterministic routing: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
146
|
-
- Gate enforcement: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
## Preflight chronology
|
|
149
|
-
|
|
150
|
-
The target contained no `.forgeloop/preflight.json` and no
|
|
151
|
-
`.forgeloop/events.ndjson`. There was no `PREFLIGHT_READY`, `EXECUTION_STARTED`,
|
|
152
|
-
task identity, route identity, contract fingerprint, or persisted assessment
|
|
153
|
-
of unresolved blocking decisions.
|
|
154
|
-
|
|
155
|
-
- Preflight chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
156
|
-
|
|
157
|
-
The required ordering could not be exercised because the agent stopped before
|
|
158
|
-
contract persistence.
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
## Implementation
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
No product files were created. The target contains only files installed by
|
|
163
|
-
ForgeLoop `init`; it has no HTML, CSS, JavaScript, or other product source
|
|
164
|
-
files. The premium appearance, modern/sophisticated/trustworthy positioning,
|
|
165
|
-
responsive mobile/desktop behavior, and contact form were therefore not
|
|
166
|
-
exercised.
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
- Implementation: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
169
|
-
- Task success: `FAIL`
|
|
170
|
-
|
|
171
|
-
## Lifecycle navigation
|
|
172
|
-
|
|
173
|
-
The agent did not implement the product and did not execute `forgeloop next` as
|
|
174
|
-
part of its session. The independent post-run `next --path <target> --json`
|
|
175
|
-
inspection returned:
|
|
176
|
-
|
|
177
|
-
```json
|
|
178
|
-
{
|
|
179
|
-
"currentPhase": "RECEIVED",
|
|
180
|
-
"nextAction": "DISCOVER",
|
|
181
|
-
"terminal": false,
|
|
182
|
-
"reasonCodes": ["WORK_STATE_ABSENT"]
|
|
183
|
-
}
|
|
184
|
-
```
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
- Agent lifecycle navigation: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
187
|
-
- Execution → Verification handoff: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
188
|
-
- Implementation reconciliation: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
189
|
-
|
|
190
|
-
## Receipt preparation
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
The agent never reached `VERIFYING`, did not run `prepare-completion`, and did
|
|
193
|
-
not create an in-progress execution receipt.
|
|
194
|
-
|
|
195
|
-
- Receipt preparation: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
## Real verification execution
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
199
|
-
The agent executed no product checks. There was no syntax check, build,
|
|
200
|
-
accessibility check, security check, performance check, responsive check, or
|
|
201
|
-
contact-form check performed by the agent.
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
- Verification execution: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
204
|
-
|
|
205
|
-
## Future-result fabrication prevention
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
The agent stopped before a verification `next` response or any check
|
|
208
|
-
requirement. No future result was serialized as `passed`, `OBSERVED`, exit code
|
|
209
|
-
`0`, or equivalent fabricated evidence.
|
|
210
|
-
|
|
211
|
-
- Future-result fabrication prevention: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
212
|
-
|
|
213
|
-
This capability was not exercised; absence of fabricated evidence is not a
|
|
214
|
-
successful verification run.
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
216
|
-
## Evidence chronology
|
|
217
|
-
|
|
218
|
-
There was no `record-check` invocation and no `VERIFICATION_RECORDED` event.
|
|
219
|
-
There is therefore no real-command → real-result → record-check chronology to
|
|
220
|
-
validate.
|
|
221
|
-
|
|
222
|
-
- Evidence chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
223
|
-
|
|
224
|
-
## Evidence serialization
|
|
225
|
-
|
|
226
|
-
The target has no `work-state.json`, `verificationEvidence`,
|
|
227
|
-
`evidenceCoverage`, execution receipt, structured checks, or
|
|
228
|
-
`VERIFICATION_RECORDED` events.
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
230
|
-
- Evidence serialization: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
231
|
-
- Evidence integrity: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
232
|
-
|
|
233
|
-
## Failure loop
|
|
234
|
-
|
|
235
|
-
No project check failed because no project check ran. The observed failure was
|
|
236
|
-
a pre-contract clarification stop, not a verification failure.
|
|
237
|
-
|
|
238
|
-
- Failure loop: `NOT_EXERCISED`
|
|
239
|
-
|
|
240
|
-
## Review transition
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
The agent did not reach verification or review, and no evidence coverage was
|
|
243
|
-
available to authorize `ENTER_REVIEWING`.
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
- Review transition: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
247
|
-
## Completion
|
|
248
|
-
|
|
249
|
-
The agent did not run `forgeloop complete` and did not produce a
|
|
250
|
-
validator-backed completion. The independent command returned `REJECTED`.
|
|
251
|
-
|
|
252
|
-
- Completion validation: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
253
|
-
- Lifecycle closure: `NOT_REACHED`
|
|
254
|
-
|
|
255
|
-
## False-completion prevention
|
|
256
|
-
|
|
257
|
-
The independent validator rejected completion rather than accepting the
|
|
258
|
-
incomplete target. The observed rejection included:
|
|
259
|
-
|
|
260
|
-
- `E_CONTRACT_MISSING`;
|
|
261
|
-
- `E_RECEIPT_MISSING`;
|
|
262
|
-
- `E_ROUTE_MISSING`;
|
|
263
|
-
- `E_STATE_MISSING`.
|
|
264
|
-
|
|
265
|
-
`validate-protocol` independently returned `INVALID` because the route, state,
|
|
266
|
-
and receipt artifacts were missing.
|
|
267
|
-
|
|
268
|
-
- False-completion prevention: `PASS`
|
|
269
|
-
|
|
270
|
-
## Chronology
|
|
271
|
-
|
|
272
|
-
The persisted event ledger was absent, so the required protocol sequence was
|
|
273
|
-
never recorded.
|
|
274
|
-
|
|
275
|
-
| Seq | Event | Timestamp | Task ID |
|
|
276
|
-
| ---: | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
277
|
-
| — | No `events.ndjson` persisted | — | — |
|
|
278
|
-
|
|
279
|
-
The following required events were absent: `TASK_RECEIVED`,
|
|
280
|
-
`CONTRACT_VALIDATED`, `ROUTE_VALIDATED`, `GATE_SATISFIED`, `PREFLIGHT_READY`,
|
|
281
|
-
`EXECUTION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_RECORDED`, and
|
|
282
|
-
`COMPLETION_VALIDATED`. Hash-chain validity: `NOT_VERIFIED` because no ledger
|
|
283
|
-
was created.
|
|
284
|
-
|
|
285
|
-
## Artifact evidence
|
|
286
|
-
|
|
287
|
-
| Artifact | Observation |
|
|
288
|
-
| --- | --- |
|
|
289
|
-
| `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Missing |
|
|
290
|
-
| `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Missing |
|
|
291
|
-
| `.forgeloop/gates/` | Missing |
|
|
292
|
-
| `.forgeloop/preflight.json` | Missing |
|
|
293
|
-
| `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Missing |
|
|
294
|
-
| `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Missing |
|
|
295
|
-
| Structured checks/evidence | Missing |
|
|
296
|
-
| `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
|
|
297
|
-
| `.forgeloop/manifest.json` | Present; package version `0.1.4` |
|
|
298
|
-
| Product implementation | No product files |
|
|
299
|
-
|
|
300
|
-
The installed package and CLI were independently verified before the agent
|
|
301
|
-
started:
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
303
|
-
- installed package version: `0.1.4`;
|
|
304
|
-
- CLI version: `0.1.4`;
|
|
305
|
-
- target initialization: completed through the published CLI;
|
|
306
|
-
- local tarball SHA-1: `966506b18dbb797949e397f39ba987dff7077283`;
|
|
307
|
-
- registry tarball SHA-1 source: matching npm tarball;
|
|
308
|
-
- local SHA-512 integrity: matching the registry integrity value.
|
|
309
|
-
|
|
310
|
-
Independent validator commands, all run against the disposable target after
|
|
311
|
-
the agent exited:
|
|
312
|
-
|
|
313
|
-
- `forgeloop next --path <target> --json`: exit `0`, phase `RECEIVED`, next
|
|
314
|
-
action `DISCOVER`, reason `WORK_STATE_ABSENT`.
|
|
315
|
-
- `forgeloop audit --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status `INVALID`, with
|
|
316
|
-
missing contract, receipt, route, and state artifacts.
|
|
317
|
-
- `forgeloop validate-protocol --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status
|
|
318
|
-
`INVALID`, with missing receipt, route, and state artifacts.
|
|
319
|
-
- `forgeloop complete --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status `REJECTED`,
|
|
320
|
-
task status `INCOMPLETE`, verification status `invalid`.
|
|
321
|
-
|
|
322
|
-
No target artifact was edited after the agent exited to make a validator pass.
|
|
323
|
-
|
|
324
|
-
## Capability results
|
|
325
|
-
|
|
326
|
-
| Capability | Result |
|
|
327
|
-
| --- | --- |
|
|
328
|
-
| Experiment isolation | `PASS` |
|
|
329
|
-
| Blind prompt purity | `PASS` |
|
|
330
|
-
| Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
|
|
331
|
-
| Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
|
|
332
|
-
| Decision classification before asking | `FAIL` |
|
|
333
|
-
| Non-blocking continuation | `FAIL` |
|
|
334
|
-
| Pre-question autonomy | `FAIL` |
|
|
335
|
-
| Contract creation | `FAIL` |
|
|
336
|
-
| Assumption serialization | `FAIL` |
|
|
337
|
-
| Contract-before-clarification | `FAIL` |
|
|
338
|
-
| Question authorization | `FAIL` |
|
|
339
|
-
| Deterministic routing | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
340
|
-
| Gate enforcement | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
341
|
-
| Preflight chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
342
|
-
| Implementation | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
343
|
-
| Agent lifecycle navigation | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
344
|
-
| Execution → Verification handoff | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
345
|
-
| Receipt preparation | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
346
|
-
| Verification execution | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
347
|
-
| Future-result fabrication prevention | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
348
|
-
| Evidence chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
349
|
-
| Evidence serialization | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
350
|
-
| Evidence integrity | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
351
|
-
| Failure loop | `NOT_EXERCISED` |
|
|
352
|
-
| Review transition | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
353
|
-
| Completion validation | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
354
|
-
| Lifecycle closure | `NOT_REACHED` |
|
|
355
|
-
| False-completion prevention | `PASS` |
|
|
356
|
-
| Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
|
|
357
|
-
|
|
358
|
-
## Independent outcome dimensions
|
|
359
|
-
|
|
360
|
-
- Task success: `FAIL`
|
|
361
|
-
- Protocol conformance: `PARTIAL`
|
|
362
|
-
- Verification validity: `INVALID`
|
|
363
|
-
- Publication: `NOT_PUBLISHED` for the target deliverable; the ForgeLoop
|
|
364
|
-
package used by the experiment was already `PUBLISHED` as `0.1.4`.
|
|
365
|
-
- Production readiness: `NOT_VERIFIED`
|
|
366
|
-
|
|
367
|
-
## Final classification
|
|
368
|
-
|
|
369
|
-
`PARTIAL`
|
|
370
|
-
|
|
371
|
-
The run verified single-agent isolation, blind prompt purity, automatic
|
|
372
|
-
bootstrap, instruction discovery, and validator rejection of false
|
|
373
|
-
completion. It did not reach protocol execution because the agent requested
|
|
374
|
-
approval for a reversible local design direction before persisting
|
|
375
|
-
`current-contract.json` and recording the choice in `assumptions[]`.
|
|
376
|
-
|
|
377
|
-
The first divergence was the approval question before contract creation. The
|
|
378
|
-
last capability passed before that divergence was instruction discovery. The
|
|
379
|
-
last valid persisted artifact was the npm-installed `.forgeloop/manifest.json`;
|
|
380
|
-
no protocol event was validly persisted. The first capability not reached was
|
|
381
|
-
contract-backed protocol preparation, beginning with contract creation and
|
|
382
|
-
deterministic routing. The smallest failure class is `CONTRACT_FAILURE`.
|
|
383
|
-
|
|
384
|
-
EVIDENCE
|
|
385
|
-
→ CLASSIFICATION
|
|
386
|
-
→ SMALLEST FAILURE CLASS
|