@bovinphang/frontend-craft 2.8.0 → 3.0.0

package/skills/fec-api-integration/references/common/engineering-practices.sources.json

@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "id": "google-review",
+      "publisher": "Google",
+      "title": "Code review standard",
+      "url": "https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/standard.html",
+      "section": "Engineering principles and code health",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living public guidance; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Use evidence and project standards; personal preference alone is not a blocker."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "ms-playbook",
+      "publisher": "Microsoft ISE",
+      "title": "Test planning",
+      "url": "https://microsoft.github.io/code-with-engineering-playbook/automated-testing/test-planning/",
+      "section": "Risk, test scope and responsibilities",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living ISE playbook; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Team practice, not a company-wide mandate; retain existing tools."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "ms-faults",
+      "publisher": "Microsoft ISE",
+      "title": "Fault injection testing",
+      "url": "https://microsoft.github.io/code-with-engineering-playbook/automated-testing/fault-injection-testing/",
+      "section": "Controlled failure and observations",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living ISE playbook; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Run scoped, controlled failures; do not infer production reliability from a small example."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "google-ts",
+      "publisher": "Google",
+      "title": "TS/JS style guide",
+      "url": "https://google.github.io/styleguide/tsguide.html",
+      "section": "Environment caveat; types and exceptions",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Public guide; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Google explicitly notes internal constraints differ; no blanket ban overriding a justified project convention."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "typescript-publishing",
+      "publisher": "TypeScript",
+      "title": "Publishing declaration files",
+      "url": "https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/declaration-files/publishing.html",
+      "section": "Types and declaration dependencies",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living handbook; check installed compiler/module resolution",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Validate the actual packed consumer; do not upgrade compiler or module mode on this basis."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "rust-api",
+      "publisher": "Rust library team",
+      "title": "Rust API Guidelines",
+      "url": "https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/",
+      "section": "Type safety, dependability and future proofing",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living recommendations; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Guidance rather than language law; preserve edition and MSRV."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "tokio-join",
+      "publisher": "Tokio project",
+      "title": "JoinHandle",
+      "url": "https://docs.rs/tokio/latest/tokio/task/struct.JoinHandle.html",
+      "section": "Drop, abort and completion",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Page observed 1.54.1; project runtime/version determines applicability",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Tokio-specific mechanics only when Tokio is already used; no new runtime dependency."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "uber-go",
+      "publisher": "Uber",
+      "title": "Go Style Guide",
+      "url": "https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md",
+      "section": "Errors, interfaces and goroutine lifetime",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living master; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Do not import Uber dependencies or turn buffer-size style into a correctness theorem."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "go-context",
+      "publisher": "Go project",
+      "title": "context package",
+      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/context",
+      "section": "Cancellation propagation and ownership",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Standard library; check owning go.mod/toolchain",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "A cancellation signal alone does not confirm worker exit."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "google-java",
+      "publisher": "Google",
+      "title": "Java Style Guide",
+      "url": "https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html",
+      "section": "Source structure and exception handling",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living public style; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Naming/layout follows local standard; style is distinct from runtime correctness."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "oracle-resources",
+      "publisher": "Oracle",
+      "title": "Try-with-resources",
+      "url": "https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html",
+      "section": "Closing resources and suppressed exceptions",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "JDK8 tutorial; not a source for newer runtime features",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Preserve primary cause and borrowed-resource ownership; check actual API contract."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "java-executor",
+      "publisher": "Oracle",
+      "title": "ExecutorService",
+      "url": "https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.base/java/util/concurrent/ExecutorService.html",
+      "section": "Shutdown, termination and awaitTermination",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Java SE17 documentation",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Check target JDK; no automatic virtual-thread or JDK migration."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "google-python",
+      "publisher": "Google",
+      "title": "Python Style Guide",
+      "url": "https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html",
+      "section": "Imports, exceptions and mutable state",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living public guide; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Keep current formatter/type checker and library responsibilities."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "python-asyncio",
+      "publisher": "Python project",
+      "title": "Coroutines and tasks",
+      "url": "https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html",
+      "section": "Cancellation and task ownership",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Page observed 3.15.2; feature availability follows project Python",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Newer TaskGroup/timeout features require a supported project version; no upgrade implied."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "cert-c",
+      "publisher": "CMU SEI",
+      "title": "MEM00-C allocation and release",
+      "url": "https://cmu-sei.github.io/secure-coding-standards/sei-cert-c-coding-standard/recommendations/memory-management-mem/mem00-c/",
+      "section": "MEM00-C memory responsibility",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "2016-edition standard family; MEM00-C is a recommendation",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Do not label recommendations as mandatory CERT rules or apply C++ ownership machinery to pure C."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "cpp-core",
+      "publisher": "C++ Core Guidelines editors",
+      "title": "C++ Core Guidelines",
+      "url": "https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines",
+      "section": "Resource and lifetime interfaces",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Page dated 2026-06-14, living release0.8",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Adapt to existing exception policy and compiler; borrowing does not imply ownership."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "google-cpp",
+      "publisher": "Google",
+      "title": "C++ Style Guide",
+      "url": "https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html",
+      "section": "Exceptions and project consistency",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living public guide; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Its exception/standard policy is not universal; preserve the owning project policy and C ABI."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "ms-sal",
+      "publisher": "Microsoft",
+      "title": "Understanding SAL",
+      "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/understanding-sal?view=msvc-170",
+      "section": "Parameter preconditions and output guarantees",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "MSVC170 documentation view",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "SAL is an optional toolchain-specific expression, not a portable mandatory annotation."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "aws-retry",
+      "publisher": "AWS",
+      "title": "Timeouts, retries and backoff with jitter",
+      "url": "https://aws.amazon.com/builders-library/timeouts-retries-and-backoff-with-jitter/",
+      "section": "Timeouts, bounded retries and retry amplification",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Article dated 2019-12-05; official Builder Center redirect",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Retry only semantically safe operations within a total budget; failure classes alone do not grant write replay."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "aws-idempotency",
+      "publisher": "AWS",
+      "title": "Making retries safe with idempotent APIs",
+      "url": "https://aws.amazon.com/builders-library/making-retries-safe-with-idempotent-APIs/",
+      "section": "Caller intent, duplicate requests and atomic recording",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Builders Library; revision unknown",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "A process-local example does not establish database/multi-process exactly-once."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "react-effects",
+      "publisher": "React project",
+      "title": "useEffect",
+      "url": "https://react.dev/reference/react/useEffect",
+      "section": "Cleanup and fetching race conditions",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Page observed React19.3; use installed project API",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "Abort and stale-result checks complement each other; no React upgrade implied."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "react-act",
+      "publisher": "React project",
+      "title": "act",
+      "url": "https://react.dev/reference/react/act",
+      "section": "Applying updates before assertions",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Page observed React19.3; verify sample versions",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "adopt",
+      "limits": "DOM simulation is not browser E2E or native desktop execution."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "vue-watchers",
+      "publisher": "Vue project",
+      "title": "Watchers",
+      "url": "https://vuejs.org/guide/essentials/watchers.html",
+      "section": "Side-effect cleanup",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Vue3; onWatcherCleanup requires3.5+ and synchronous registration",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Use supported callback cleanup on older Vue3; no framework migration."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "tauri-permissions",
+      "publisher": "Tauri project",
+      "title": "Permissions",
+      "url": "https://v2.tauri.app/security/permissions/",
+      "section": "Command allow/deny and capability scope",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Tauri2 docs; check installed version/configuration",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Rust command-unit tests do not activate webview permissions or prove packaged GUI security."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "electron-security",
+      "publisher": "Electron project",
+      "title": "Security",
+      "url": "https://www.electronjs.org/docs/latest/tutorial/security",
+      "section": "IPC sender checks and renderer trust",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living docs; match installed Electron",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Handler tests do not prove sandbox/context isolation is active in a packaged app."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "spring-tests",
+      "publisher": "Spring project",
+      "title": "Testing Spring Boot applications",
+      "url": "https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/3.5/reference/testing/spring-boot-applications.html",
+      "section": "Test slices and application tests",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Boot3.5 docs observed3.5.16; preserve sample/project versions",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Test scope matters; MVC tests do not establish live DB/transaction or deployment behavior."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "fastapi-lifespan",
+      "publisher": "FastAPI project",
+      "title": "Lifespan events",
+      "url": "https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/advanced/events/",
+      "section": "Acquire and release application resources",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living FastAPI documentation; match pinned dependencies",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Use actual lifespan execution in tests; import does not own a live connection."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "gin-binding",
+      "publisher": "Gin project",
+      "title": "Binding",
+      "url": "https://gin-gonic.com/en/docs/binding/",
+      "section": "Binding errors and validation",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living Gin documentation; match pinned module",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Writing/aborting a response does not replace explicit control-flow return in the current handler."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "axum-extractors",
+      "publisher": "Axum project",
+      "title": "Extractors",
+      "url": "https://docs.rs/axum/latest/axum/extract/",
+      "section": "Extractor order and rejections",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Latest route observed0.8.9; fixed0.8.9 route unavailable via browser tool",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Pinned existing example is authoritative for compilation; do not assume source signatures across releases."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "drogon-filters",
+      "publisher": "Drogon project",
+      "title": "Middleware and Filter",
+      "url": "https://github.com/drogonframework/drogon/wiki/ENG-05-Middleware-and-Filter",
+      "section": "Filter callbacks and continuation",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Living wiki; match compiled example version",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Synthetic role headers are not authentication; callback lifetime must follow actual ownership."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "node-typescript",
+      "publisher": "Node.js project",
+      "title": "Modules: TypeScript",
+      "url": "https://nodejs.org/api/typescript.html",
+      "section": "Type-stripping history, enabling, and separate type checking",
+      "checkedAt": "2026-11-08",
+      "versionScope": "Page observed26.13.0; sample>=22.18, actual24.14.1 tested; product Node>=22 unchanged",
+      "licenseStatus": "unknown",
+      "adoption": "conditional",
+      "limits": "Native stripping is not type checking and ignores tsconfig. Missing sample capability is MISSING, not a product runtime upgrade."
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/fec-api-integration/references/engineering-practices.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+practiceCards:
+  - id: "fec-api-integration:retry-safety"
+    level: "conditional"
+    sourceIds: ["aws-retry","aws-idempotency"]
+    caseIds: ["EP-UI-01","EP-SVC-01"]
+    evidence: "review-only"
+  - id: "fec-api-integration:consumer-contract"
+    level: "required"
+    sourceIds: ["typescript-publishing","google-review"]
+    caseIds: ["EP-TS-01"]
+    evidence: "review-only"
+---
+
+# Local engineering decisions
+
+Locate the actual role, toolchain and existing conventions, then read relevant [shared principles](common/engineering-practices.md). These conditions apply to this entry, not every project. Structure checks do not prove all semantics or execution.
+
+<a id="fec-api-integration:retry-safety"></a>
+## A retryable failure is not permission to repeat a write
+
+Level: conditional
+
+### Risk
+Timeout, network failure or5xx can follow an already committed write.
+
+### Applies
+Where the client owns retries or recovery; inspect actual operation semantics and current library configuration.
+
+### Decision
+Separate reads from side effects, preserve one intent/key across allowed retries, and require a server-side idempotency/reconciliation contract. Bound attempts, total time and cancellation at one layer; honor Retry-After only within safe replay.
+
+### Exceptions
+Without that contract, retain pending confirmation and offer status/reconciliation or support. A disabled button, new key or abort signal is not a server-side guarantee.
+
+### Examples
+Better: same key/intent retrieves the committed result. Worse: any429/5xx/network error automatically retries payment three times.
+
+### Verification
+Inject post-commit response failure, intent mismatch and bounded recovery. The service case proves a local HTTP contract, not a distributed payment guarantee.
+
+### Sources
+aws-retry, aws-idempotency — [registry and limits](common/engineering-practices.sources.json).
+
+Evidence IDs: EP-UI-01, EP-SVC-01; review-only.  Execution status and scope require actual records; a related ID does not prove every decision on this card.
+
+<a id="fec-api-integration:consumer-contract"></a>
+## Validate and map at the real API boundary
+
+Level: required
+
+### Risk
+Generated types or a response cast can conceal invalid payloads and ambiguous empty/error states.
+
+### Applies
+For frontend API clients and domain adapters, not a mandate to redesign backend endpoints.
+
+### Decision
+Establish request/response, status, empty-body, units and compatibility behavior with the actual contract. Validate unknown values then map protocol data into domain/UI state using existing tools.
+
+### Exceptions
+Do not force a new generator or validation package. Communicate missing behavior/permission needs before assuming server implementation or field names.
+
+### Examples
+Better: invalid data fails before a domain effect and the UI can recover. Worse: requestJson<T> alone is treated as runtime validation.
+
+### Verification
+Run the existing client/consumer checks for malformed, empty, valid and failure results; generic TS input evidence does not cover every HTTP protocol.
+
+### Sources
+typescript-publishing, google-review — [registry and limits](common/engineering-practices.sources.json).
+
+Evidence IDs: EP-TS-01; review-only.  Execution status and scope require actual records; a related ID does not prove every decision on this card.

package/skills/fec-code-review/SKILL.md

@@ -5,6 +5,22 @@ description: Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review,
 
 # Front-end code review
 
+## Review modes and coverage
+
+User-specified scope takes precedence over the default. Use the following three review modes:
+
+- **Change review**: only when recent changes, current edits, staged changes, a PR or a commit are explicitly requested or clearly established by the active task, review those changes and necessary context. For local changes, inspect staged and unstaged diffs and relevant untracked project files within the requested scope; a staged-only request reviews only staged changes. If there are no changes, report that there is nothing to review; do not switch to recent commits or expand scope automatically.
+- **Targeted review**: when files or directories are specified, inventory and review existing code in that scope, including unchanged code; no Git diff is required.
+- **Project review (default)**: when no scope or change context is specified, or when the entire project is requested, inventory project-owned frontend code, related tests, configuration and dependency declarations, then review in module batches, including unchanged code; no Git diff is required.
+
+Select scope before collecting diffs. A file/directory alone means full review of that scope; a path combined with an explicit change request restricts incremental review to that path. An unqualified invocation defaults to project review even if Git changes exist. At review start, state the selected mode and target scope. When automatically delegating review after edits, pass the current change scope explicitly; do not trigger project review merely because the reviewer was called.
+
+Exclude dependency directories, build outputs, caches, generated files and third-party code by default, and record exclusions. Keep the frontend responsibility boundary; this is not a backend audit. A nonexistent target or a scope with no relevant files must be reported explicitly, not replaced with another scope.
+
+Merge findings with the same root cause across batches. Report **review mode, target scope, reviewed files/modules, exclusions, unreviewed files/modules, completion status and verification commands/results**. If context or execution limits prevent completion, mark the review partial and list remaining modules; never claim complete project coverage. Reading callers for context or running project-wide lint/typecheck does not count as manual review of those files.
+
+Change reviews retain merge recommendations. Targeted and project reviews use a risk assessment (Low / Medium / High, with blocking findings), not a claim of merge readiness. Preserve severity levels, evidence requirements and report filenames. Output reports only unless repairs are explicitly requested.
+
 ## Purpose
 
 Review the front-end code quality from 8 dimensions including architecture, type safety, accessibility, style consistency, performance and testability, and output a graded review report.
@@ -128,7 +144,7 @@ When writing a code review report, load [references/report-template.md](referenc
 ## Constraints
 
 - Do not write personal style preferences as blocking issues; blocking items must have clear evidence of user impact, runtime risk, security risk, or maintenance cost.
-- Don't give conclusions when diff, file location or reproduction clues are missing.
+- Do not give findings without file locations and supporting evidence; a diff is required only for change review.
 - In-depth security, accessibility, E2E and performance issues are only screened initially; when an evidence chain is needed, they will be diverted to special skills.
 - Do not report multiple reports for the same root cause; merge them into one representative finding and list the scope of impact.
 - Format issues that are stably covered by automated tools are handed over to lint/format and are not discovered by human reviewers.
@@ -141,3 +157,10 @@ When writing a code review report, load [references/report-template.md](referenc
 - The review report is saved as `reports/code-review-YYYY-MM-DD-HHmmss.md`
 - Multi-dimensional reviews should consolidate duplicate findings and explain which special capabilities have been diverted to
 - Label uncertain items with required verification commands or supplementary context, and do not write guesses into facts
+## Refactoring Boundary
+
+A general review may flag maintainability evidence, but dedicated smell diagnosis or a behavior-preserving refactoring plan owns deeper structural analysis. Review should not silently execute structural changes; it can recommend diagnosis/planning when a finding needs systematic transformation.
+
+## Engineering practices
+
+Read the [local engineering decisions](references/engineering-practices.md) for this task and follow their links to relevant shared principles. Apply levels and exceptions against actual project contracts; product frontend/backend labels do not constrain language or role.