@bongos/core 1.21.113 → 1.21.115

package/tests/fixtures/government-ask-cards.json

@@ -0,0 +1,1284 @@
+{
+  "_note": "Test data only (tests/government_asks.mjs, tests/government_agent_asks.mjs): real past asks, each as the agent first wrote it (raw) and as the card in the ask shape it should have been. Kept from the deleted prototype overlay (task 1004717); the hall never reads this file.",
+  "cards": [
+    {
+      "id": "redteam_reports:1000009",
+      "question": "Judge a medium-severity security report?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "confirm",
+          "act": "confirm",
+          "label": "Confirm it",
+          "result": "It is logged as real and a fix is filed."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "dispute",
+          "act": "dispute",
+          "label": "Dispute it",
+          "result": "It closes as not a real problem."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "confirm",
+        "why": "Read it on the Disputes desk; an open report counts as real until checked."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "routing_note": "The details stay on the Disputes desk, behind its rank floor.",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays open on the Disputes desk.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Security report — details withheld"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "redteam_reports:1000020",
+      "question": "Judge a high-severity security report?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "confirm",
+          "act": "confirm",
+          "label": "Confirm it",
+          "result": "It is logged as real and a fix is filed."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "dispute",
+          "act": "dispute",
+          "label": "Dispute it",
+          "result": "It closes as not a real problem."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "confirm",
+        "why": "Read it on the Disputes desk; an open report counts as real until checked."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "routing_note": "The details stay on the Disputes desk, behind its rank floor.",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays open on the Disputes desk.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Security report — details withheld"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "redteam_reports:1000021",
+      "question": "Judge a high-severity security report?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "confirm",
+          "act": "confirm",
+          "label": "Confirm it",
+          "result": "It is logged as real and a fix is filed."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "dispute",
+          "act": "dispute",
+          "label": "Dispute it",
+          "result": "It closes as not a real problem."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "confirm",
+        "why": "Read it on the Disputes desk; an open report counts as real until checked."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "routing_note": "The details stay on the Disputes desk, behind its rank floor.",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays open on the Disputes desk.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Security report — details withheld"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "redteam_reports:1000024",
+      "question": "Judge a high-severity security report?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "confirm",
+          "act": "confirm",
+          "label": "Confirm it",
+          "result": "It is logged as real and a fix is filed."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "dispute",
+          "act": "dispute",
+          "label": "Dispute it",
+          "result": "It closes as not a real problem."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "confirm",
+        "why": "Read it on the Disputes desk; an open report counts as real until checked."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "routing_note": "The details stay on the Disputes desk, behind its rank floor.",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays open on the Disputes desk.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Security report — details withheld"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "redteam_reports:1000028",
+      "question": "Judge a medium-severity security report?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "confirm",
+          "act": "confirm",
+          "label": "Confirm it",
+          "result": "It is logged as real and a fix is filed."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "dispute",
+          "act": "dispute",
+          "label": "Dispute it",
+          "result": "It closes as not a real problem."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "confirm",
+        "why": "Read it on the Disputes desk; an open report counts as real until checked."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "routing_note": "The details stay on the Disputes desk, behind its rank floor.",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays open on the Disputes desk.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Security report — details withheld"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "override_requests:1000017",
+      "question": "Pay this task despite the grader crashing on it?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "approve",
+          "act": "approve",
+          "label": "Approve",
+          "result": "The task counts as passed and its builder is paid."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "decline",
+          "act": "reject",
+          "label": "Decline",
+          "result": "The task stays at completed and nobody is paid."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "approve",
+        "why": "The 0.0 is a crashed grader, not a verdict, and a re-grade cannot run."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "routing_note": "Release has a Lead, but the Lead is the builder this would pay, so it goes to the owner.",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "The task stays at completed and its credits stay unpaid.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Override: Reconstruct the cost-plus session rewards lost to the Windows transcript-encoding bug (blast radius + backfill)",
+        "detail": "This grade is not a quality verdict at all -- it is a recorded grader OUTAGE, and no re-grade can replace it. The persisted row shows panel_outcome='unavailable' with all four workers (narc, quality, hacker, efficiency) dead on SUBAGENT_NONZERO_EXIT, error_count=4, issue_count=0 and no rubric scores whatsoever. The panel never ran, so nothing about this work was ever judged; the 0.0 is the absence of a signal, not a finding. Grade aggregates are specified to exclude unavailable rounds (n_unavailable) precisely so an outage never counts as a zero -- yet here it is holding a task at completed and withholding the claimant's credits. The outage condition itself is resolved: the panel spawns `claude -p` locally and `bongos doctor` now reports the CLI logged in. An honest re-grade was attempted first and is structurally impossible: the work landed on main (claim head a431d7ef, 1030 commits back) so `--regrade` answers 'Nothing to grade: the committed diff is empty', while `--base` requires HEAD 0 commits ahead of origin/main -- an old tip whose ship/grade tooling is 4 revisions stale, which would run the stale grader that is the silent-failure root cause of #662. Neither leg can be satisfied without defeating the other. Filed by an Archon on behalf of the claim holder builder-2016 (builder 1000027); no code was edited, because an outage has no findings to fix."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000136",
+      "question": "Who writes the finish line for working area 2?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "owner",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "The area owner",
+          "result": "The area owner is asked for one or two sentences."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "me",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "I will",
+          "result": "You write it here and the goal can close one day."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "later",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Not now",
+          "result": "The area stays open-ended and holds version 2 open."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "owner",
+        "why": "Each area's scope belongs to its owner; guessing it would be wrong."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "lead:planning",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "Version 2 cannot close while this area has no finish line.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Working area 2 has no definition of done — ADR 0264 leaves its 5,000-builder state blank",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000143",
+      "question": "Test sign-up as a stranger before the stealth gate goes up?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "walk",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Walk it first",
+          "result": "You sign up with a fresh GitHub account, then the gate goes up."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "gate",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Gate first",
+          "result": "The gate goes up and the walk waits for it to come down."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "more",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Tell me more",
+          "result": "An agent writes up the steps before you decide."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "walk",
+        "why": "Once the gate is up, a stranger's first screen is a password box."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "Task 1002715 stays blocked and real sign-up goes untested.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "True-stranger UAT (task 1002715) needs the owner: a fresh GitHub account + human OAuth consent",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000162",
+      "question": "Walk the project wizard once to close its last check?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "walk",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "I'll walk it",
+          "result": "Create a test project, invite someone, press Skip, report back."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "door",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Give agents a way",
+          "result": "A free test door is built so an agent can walk it."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "later",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Not now",
+          "result": "It stays parked and is no longer offered to agents."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "walk",
+        "why": "A couple of minutes of yours beats building a bypass for agents."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "The wizard check stays open and agents keep skipping the task.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Task 1003584 (the C6 wizard residual) needs a signed-in browser and would enqueue paid compute — no agent session can close it",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000180",
+      "question": "Spend one supervised session recovering five lost bug screenshots?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "recover",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Yes, recover them",
+          "result": "You sit in while an agent re-fetches them through the bot."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "drop",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Let them go",
+          "result": "The bug reports keep their words but lose their pictures."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "more",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Show me first",
+          "result": "An agent lists which bugs are missing which pictures."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "recover",
+        "why": "The originals may still be on Discord; waiting risks losing them for good."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "Five screenshots stay missing from four bug reports.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Blocker — details withheld",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000181",
+      "question": "Tell Builder 2019 their project was taken down?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "draft",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Draft it for me",
+          "result": "An agent drafts the message; you read it and send it."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "tell",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "I'll tell them",
+          "result": "You write to them and ask if they want it back."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "later",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Not now",
+          "result": "They find out when they next open the site."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "draft",
+        "why": "Their data was kept, so the news can come with an offer to restore."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "They are never told, and the project stays down.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Blocker — details withheld",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000182",
+      "question": "Close task 1004469 as already fixed by a duplicate?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "close",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Close it",
+          "result": "The task closes as done and its claim is released."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "check",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Check first",
+          "result": "An agent confirms the fix is on main, then closes it."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "leave",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Leave it",
+          "result": "It stays claimed and the runner keeps flagging it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "close",
+        "why": "The fix already landed under task 1004472; there is nothing left to build."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "lead:planning",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "The claim stays stuck and the runner keeps reporting it.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Autobongos: task 1004469 came back still_held — knip dead-code ratchet red on main since the bongos-cli-feedback merge — blocks every PR",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "autobongos_fence:fence",
+      "question": "Turn unattended building back on?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "on",
+          "act": "switch_on",
+          "label": "Turn it on",
+          "result": "Agents work through the night, inside this month's $30 cap."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "off",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Keep it off",
+          "result": "Nothing builds unless someone starts a session."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "off",
+        "why": "It was paused for a performance check; switch it on once that is done."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays off, and no work happens overnight.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Unattended building is switched off",
+        "detail": "Builder 2013: stop runner for performance evaluation (2026-10-02)"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000188",
+      "question": "Upgrade the setup service so new projects start in founding mode?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "now",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Do it now",
+          "result": "Five steps on the server, then one test project to check."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "guide",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Walk me through",
+          "result": "An agent guides you through each step on the server."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "later",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Later",
+          "result": "Every new project keeps starting without founding mode."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "now",
+        "why": "Two projects were already born wrong; each new one adds clean-up."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "New projects keep opening without founding mode.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Move the project-setup runner off core 1.20.82, so new projects are born in genesis",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000189",
+      "question": "How far should Bongos trust modules other people write?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "trusted",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Trusted only",
+          "result": "Only modules you approve may run; written down as a rule."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "sandbox",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Sandbox them",
+          "result": "Outside modules get a locked-down database and no secrets."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "publisher",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "By publisher",
+          "result": "Known publishers get full access; everyone else is sandboxed."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "trusted",
+        "why": "Simplest to do now; a sandbox can follow before strangers publish."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "Task 1003397 stays blocked and modules keep full database access.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Decide how far Bongos trusts third-party modules (task 1003397)",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "blockers:1000191",
+      "question": "Let the tweak editor show landing pages side by side?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "allow",
+          "act": "go ahead",
+          "label": "Allow it",
+          "result": "A small change on the web server, then the split view switches on."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "guide",
+          "act": "need more",
+          "label": "Walk me through",
+          "result": "An agent guides you through the change."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "later",
+          "act": "not now",
+          "label": "Not now",
+          "result": "Artists keep editing those pages without the side view."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "allow",
+        "why": "Only our own builders site may frame them; sign-in stays protected."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "owner",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "The split view stays off for the landing and status pages.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Blocker — details withheld",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000184",
+      "question": "Does the orb motion stay lively and never freeze or drift?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "A recording is the proof; an override is for when filming is impossible."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Physics.** The orb motion runs server-side as the single source of truth, developed to a lively-but-legible feel that stays bounded and stable indefinitely (never freezes, blows up, or drifts off-screen).",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000215",
+      "question": "Do the space whales fly straight to their target orb?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Easy to see on screen, so easy to film."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Space whales fly straight.** Whales travel in a straight line to their destination orb — implemented via the time-delayed orb render (orbs shown at t - T, where T = a whale's cross-map travel time), so the whale is aimed at the target's KNOWN future position and intercepts it cleanly. They read as mystical / all-knowing rather than curving in pursuit.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000190",
+      "question": "Does an application show the owner the applicant's track record?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "One application from a test account shows it end to end."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "A submitted application **carries the applicant's builder profile** — their cross-project track record (subject to the C2 hide setting) plus an optional note — so the receiving project sees the applicant's platform-wide record, not just a name. A project's owner/admin can view the pending applications for their project and approve or decline them.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000380",
+      "question": "Does each screen lead with the shape of the work?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "A short walk through the hall and a session start shows it."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Noise is limited at every human interface.** Every surface a person meets - the session's opening screen, the hall's boards, the resident instructions a session pays for before it does anything - leads with the shape of the work rather than a flat enumeration of it, and carries nothing that is already available elsewhere.\n\nConcretely, when this is achieved:\n\n- The session entry point opens on the goals a user has joined, with claimable work grouped beneath them. No builder's first screen of any session is an ungrouped task table.\n- Where a grouping exists in the data, the interface uses it: the claimable queue is presented by dependency chain with each chain's total reward, not as independent rows a person must topologically sort by eye.\n- Resident context is budgeted and free of duplication. Nothing loaded into every session restates a document that session can already reach, and CI holds the budget.\n- The hall's written voice standard is applied to the nav and the top hall pages, so the words a person reads are as deliberate as the layout they sit in.\n\n**The test is subtractive, not additive:** this criterion is satisfied by what a person no longer has to skip past, so a change that adds a helpful panel does not advance it.\n\n*Drafted 2026-09-19 at the area owner's instruction, splitting the second clause of C5 `wa6-role-experience` - which carried no criterion of its own - into a criterion that can be met. Follows the precedent of task 1003731, which split three criteria out of this same goal. C5's own footnote reserves that right: \"this is the floor, not the ceiling.\"*",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000368",
+      "question": "Can a project create its own ranks and what they unlock?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "pass",
+        "why": "It describes the platform at 5,000 builders, which is not here yet."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Working area 7 — the 5,000-builder state.** Transcribed verbatim from [ADR 0264 §1](docs/adr/0264-the-ten-working-areas.md), the 2026-09-07 goal review by the owner and the full team. Owner: **Builder 2016 / Builder 2012**.\n\nFully customizable creation of ranks and what each entails for project access. Recommended base ranks and governments ship for different project types and sizes.\n\n---\n\n*This is the review's own sentence, not an invented criterion — ADR 0264 §5 reserves an area's scope to its owner and warns against guessing it. It is recorded here because a goal with no done-when can never achieve, and a criterion-less goal would entomb BONGOS-V2 the way the catch-alls entombed V1 (R16: a version closes when its last non-maintenance goal achieves). **The owner may add, sharpen or replace criteria on this goal at any time** — this is the floor, not the ceiling.*",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000388",
+      "question": "Does a new project open with the seven planet questions?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Starting one test project shows every question in order."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**A new project starts with decisions, not setup.** Terms acknowledgement, then demo-or-create as two equal doors, then the seven planet-physics questions (state, geography, builder ages, entity, builders + growth, rewards, framing) with their branches — the existing-project path, the screening stop screen, the voice split after the entity question — and a planet that visibly forms as they are answered. The answers are stored on the project and pre-fill (or skip) today's technical steps.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000389",
+      "question": "Can a small team try a demo and keep their planet?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "One demo run from start to \"keep your planet?\" proves it."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**A small team can try Bongos in a few hours and keep what they made.** The demo route takes people, hours each and an idea, checks it fits and says what to trim, picks the defaults, invites the team (each on their own AI plan), and ends with \"keep your planet?\" — carrying settings, team and work into planet creation, or keeping it as a demo.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000390",
+      "question": "Do the chosen look and logo show in hall, sky and tab?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Pick a look and a logo once, then film the three places."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Every hall can look like its own project.** At creation the founder picks a look for light and dark mode (the style library's looks or their own accent, with an optional night tint) and uploads a logo; the hall, the planet's card in the sky and the browser tab all show them, and text stays readable in both modes.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000391",
+      "question": "Does a founding project show its stages and wake rooms in turn?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Founding mode is visible from the first screen of a new project."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**While a project is being founded, its existing hall says so and grows up in front of its first builders.** The hall wears project founding mode — a band at the top with the stage and day, a genesis home running Decide then the five stages (scope, strategize, charter, legalize, legislation) as real tasks, rooms waking as each stage finishes, everyone who joins numbered as a founding builder for good — and when the stages are done the planet comes alive and the full hall opens. A hall that is not founding renders exactly as it does today.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000392",
+      "question": "Does each profile lead with that person's own craft numbers?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Open one artist, one ideator and one engineer profile."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Every public surface shows each role by its own work.**\n\nWork Area 6 changed how artists and ideators work and are paid (Tweak Mode, the sky, the idea payout streams), but every page that shows a person to other people still measures them by \"tasks they shipped\", which is an engineer's unit. A strong ideator or artist reads as near-zero. When this is true:\n\n- The profile leads with the numbers of the person's own craft: an ideator's thoughts, their size and how much of that work is still alive; an artist's approved pages and how much of each surface they have tweaked; an engineer's works shipped.\n- An approved page tweak is the ARTIST's work wherever shipped work is listed or counted; the session that applied it is shown as the helper, not the author. (Payout is unchanged: the artist already receives the page's 30 credits.)\n- Every credit a person earned is visible, charted and labelled by its kind, whether or not they ever shipped a task.\n- The leaderboard, status page and hub rollup can tell the roles apart, and show nothing that does not apply to a role (no \"0 tokens\" for a browser-only artist).\n- Achievements and Discord announcements exist for artist and ideator moments, not only claims and ships.\n- The design is not slop: it is built on what the project already has (the sky, the studio and its tally, the hall tokens and mocks), mocked first and approved by the owner before it is built.\n\n*Written 2026-09-30 from the owner's audit of how the Artist and Ideator roles come across in public. NOT in scope: new pay for reviews, approvals, copy flags or board votes. The owner parked that until the review process is honed (filed as an idea).*",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000393",
+      "question": "Can an owner change the update rule from the deploy page?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "One change on a test project is the whole check."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Each project stores its own core update rule (pinned / patch / minor). Its owner can change it from /deploy, and the deploy runner and snapshot read that rule instead of the hard-coded platform default. The cloudbongos control plane follows `minor`, so a step-up release such as 1.20 lands with no one pressing anything.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000394",
+      "question": "Does a failed update say honestly what happened, then retry?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "pass",
+        "why": "Its test setup, task 1004557, is still being built."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Every failed core move carries a class (transient / known-wedge / needs-decision / unknown) and wording that says what actually happened: a refusal before the pin moved is never reported as \"rolled back\", and a rollback that itself failed has its own state. Transient failures retry on a backoff (about 15m, 1h, 6h) instead of back-to-back inside one runner tick.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000395",
+      "question": "Does the runner heal a planted snag with nobody logging in?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "pass",
+        "why": "The planted snag comes from task 1004557, still being built."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "The runner recognises the known wedges that today need SSH (a dirty instance tree, a pending schema migrated with the right PGDATABASE, a disk filled by old pg_dumps, a release tagged before it was published), applies the fix itself, records what it did, and retries the move. Proven by planting a wedge on a test project and watching it heal unattended.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000396",
+      "question": "Does an unfixable update raise one blocker and one notice?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "pass",
+        "why": "The unfixable snag comes from task 1004557, still being built."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "A failure the runner cannot heal (class unknown, or rollback failed) files a blocker and posts a Discord notice with the diagnosis, once per failure rather than per retry. The /deploy failure card shows the class, and for needs-decision cases offers the one-click action (for example \"allow this update rule\") instead of a dead-end sentence.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000403",
+      "question": "Do the city and street show every waiting matter, live?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Open the city in light and dark and film both."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "The home city and the street show every matter waiting on a governor, live from Bongos, in light and dark: the animated isometric home with one start governing button, the street of civic buildings and districts with orange (needs you), white (moving) and grey (settled) pins, and the six readings (flow, promises, money, people, fairness, rules at work) each opening its building.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000404",
+      "question": "Can you enter every building and ride the lift between floors?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Nine buildings, one short film."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Every civic building (Charter, Rules, Disputes, People, Planning, Automation, Review, Release, Treasury) can be entered and is drawn as real storeys: each floor carries its sign, its lettered name and state, the lift moves to the chosen floor, empty floors show room to grow, and the panel shows who decides there, how, what is on the table and the record. Floors whose engine is not built yet are present and become live when it lands.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000405",
+      "question": "Can you vote, object or abstain right from a matter's card?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "One matter on a test project covers every action."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "A governor can act on a matter from its card: vote for, object with a reason naming a section, abstain, revise and sit again, release or hold, say fine by me to an admission, and the city, the readings and the record update to show the result.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000406",
+      "question": "Can each building's decision rule be changed by amendment there?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Draft one amendment from a building and film it passing."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Who decides each area, and how, is set per project by amendment from the building itself (change how this works), never by a settings page; the four example governments (one founder, council, everyone votes, trustees) are each expressible.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000407",
+      "question": "Can every governing action be done in place on its floor?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Walk each floor once and act on one row."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Every floor of every civic building is a desk: what needs the governor is a one-line row they can act on in place, numbers are short tiles, quiet floors say so in one line, and no governing action Bongos supports requires leaving the city for an older hall page. Every row, tile and status obeys the line rule, checked automatically.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000416",
+      "question": "Does a new project start under the government its founder picked?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "Found one test project and check its charter."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**A project is born governed.** The government a founder picks while creating the project (genesis) is the government in force from day one: it closes each genesis stage, it shapes who can vote and what passes, and it can be changed later in the hall in one move. No project leaves genesis on a default it never chose.\n\nThis is a standing outcome, not a single task. It is met when every route into a new project (demo, solo, team, existing project) arrives governed by its own choice, however many tasks that takes.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "criteria_uat:1000418",
+      "question": "Does the government test walk pass on a test project?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "record",
+          "act": "record",
+          "label": "Record a check",
+          "result": "You film it on the live site; the criterion closes."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "force",
+          "act": "force:tested_by_hand",
+          "label": "Close without film",
+          "result": "Closes as tested by hand, logged as an override."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "pass",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Not me",
+          "result": "It waits for a tester who did not build it."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "record",
+        "why": "The walk reports pass or fail by itself; film the report."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "committee:review.testers",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It stays awaiting a check, and its goal cannot close.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "**Every government mechanic is proven, and stays proven.** A repeatable walk on a test project exercises every government form, every building's decision rule, every action a vote can carry out, and the genesis-to-government path, and reports pass or fail for each. The walk is re-run whenever government changes, so a regression is caught before a builder meets it. Anything the walk finds broken is filed and fixed.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "board:16",
+      "question": "Seen that the city plan passed, two votes to none?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "seen",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Got it",
+          "result": "The card leaves your queue."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "note",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Add a note",
+          "result": "Your note goes to the Planning Lead."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "seen",
+        "why": "It is settled; everyone who voted said yes."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "lead:planning",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "It drops out of the queue on its own.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Governor experience: govern the project as a city",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "board:vote:investments",
+      "question": "Should the Treasury build an investments arm?",
+      "options": [
+        {
+          "key": "yes",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Yes, build it",
+          "result": "The scaffold becomes a new wing and its Lead plans it."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "no",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "No",
+          "result": "The scaffold comes down; nothing is built."
+        },
+        {
+          "key": "plan",
+          "act": null,
+          "label": "Plan first",
+          "result": "The Treasury Lead writes a one-page plan for the next vote."
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommend": {
+        "key": "plan",
+        "why": "It is a new kind of spending; a plan should come before a vote."
+      },
+      "waits_on": "board:charter",
+      "if_nobody_answers": "The vote closes undecided and the scaffold stays up.",
+      "raw": {
+        "title": "Illustrative, not a real financial product: a Treasury wing that would put reserve money to work.",
+        "detail": ""
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}