@bohuyeshan/openagent-labforge-core 3.13.0 → 3.13.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.ja.md +130 -130
- package/README.ko.md +128 -128
- package/README.md +235 -229
- package/README.ru.md +131 -131
- package/README.zh-cn.md +237 -231
- package/bin/openagent-labforge.js +192 -192
- package/bin/platform.test.ts +20 -20
- package/dist/cli/index.js +2 -2
- package/dist/hooks/atlas/idle-event.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/hooks/atlas/resolve-active-boulder-session.d.ts +11 -0
- package/dist/hooks/atlas/types.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dist/index.js +196 -140
- package/package.json +30 -30
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,229 +1,235 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# OpenAgent Labforge
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
OpenAgent Labforge is an OpenCode plugin fork focused on three things:
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
- stronger engineering-oriented orchestration
|
|
6
|
-
- explicit, inspectable child-session delegation
|
|
7
|
-
- bioinformatics-first specialist workflows
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
It is a derivative of `code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent` and keeps upstream
|
|
10
|
-
license/provenance boundaries intact. See [LICENSE.md](LICENSE.md),
|
|
11
|
-
[NOTICE](NOTICE), [THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md](THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md), and
|
|
12
|
-
[docs/licensing.md](docs/licensing.md).
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## What This Fork Is Now
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
This README describes current runtime behavior only.
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
The plugin is now centered on:
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
- OpenCode-native delegation through `task(subagent_type=...)`
|
|
21
|
-
- stable plugin/agent/MCP injection for newer OpenCode behavior
|
|
22
|
-
- explicit search/doc/code/paper retrieval separation
|
|
23
|
-
- a growing first-party bioinformatics agent and skill stack
|
|
24
|
-
- local-first development and installation
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Current Core Capabilities
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
### Engineering orchestration
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
- `sisyphus`: main orchestrator
|
|
31
|
-
- `wase`: fully autonomous orchestrator
|
|
32
|
-
- `hephaestus`: deep coding executor
|
|
33
|
-
- `prometheus`: planner
|
|
34
|
-
- `atlas`: execution coordinator
|
|
35
|
-
- `metis`: pre-planning consultant
|
|
36
|
-
- `momus`: plan reviewer
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
These core agents are being upgraded with stronger engineering behavior:
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
- better scope discipline
|
|
41
|
-
- stronger verification expectations
|
|
42
|
-
- more explicit planning and review standards
|
|
43
|
-
- cleaner delegation contracts
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
Current engineering-capability layering:
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
- strong execution + orchestration: `sisyphus`, `wase`
|
|
48
|
-
- strong execution: `hephaestus`
|
|
49
|
-
- strong orchestration: `atlas`
|
|
50
|
-
- strong planning: `prometheus`, `metis`
|
|
51
|
-
- strong review: `momus`
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
This layering is intentional so future de-duplication stays easy if OpenCode
|
|
54
|
-
itself absorbs parts of the same capability set.
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
### Specialist agents
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
- `explore`: local codebase discovery
|
|
59
|
-
- `librarian`: focused upstream docs / SDK / library research
|
|
60
|
-
- `github-scout`: repository and implementation scouting
|
|
61
|
-
- `tech-scout`: ecosystem / benchmark / launch analysis
|
|
62
|
-
- `article-writer`: public technical writing
|
|
63
|
-
- `scientific-writer`: research-facing technical writing
|
|
64
|
-
- `multimodal-looker`: PDF / image / figure understanding
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
### Bioinformatics stack
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
The fork now has an explicit bioinformatics hierarchy:
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
- main bio entrypoints:
|
|
71
|
-
`bio-orchestrator` for integrated coordination
|
|
72
|
-
`bio-pipeline-operator` for execution-focused work
|
|
73
|
-
- internal specialists used through child-session delegation:
|
|
74
|
-
`bio-methodologist` for computational design / QC / statistics planning
|
|
75
|
-
`wet-lab-designer` for user-executed wet-lab validation planning
|
|
76
|
-
`paper-evidence-synthesizer` for cross-paper evidence matrix and confidence grading
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
This is not limited to generic "analysis". The intended workflow includes:
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
- literature retrieval
|
|
81
|
-
- public dataset discovery
|
|
82
|
-
- computational analysis
|
|
83
|
-
- wet-lab validation design for the user to execute
|
|
84
|
-
- evidence integration
|
|
85
|
-
- specialist reporting
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
## Built-in Skill Direction
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
The built-in skill set now covers both general and bio workflows.
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
Examples:
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
- browser / UI / git:
|
|
94
|
-
- `playwright`
|
|
95
|
-
- `frontend-ui-ux`
|
|
96
|
-
- `git-master`
|
|
97
|
-
- document / report:
|
|
98
|
-
- `docx-workbench`
|
|
99
|
-
- `pdf-toolkit`
|
|
100
|
-
- `xlsx-analyst`
|
|
101
|
-
- bioinformatics:
|
|
102
|
-
- `bio-tools`
|
|
103
|
-
- `bio-methods`
|
|
104
|
-
- `wet-lab-design`
|
|
105
|
-
- `bio-pipeline`
|
|
106
|
-
- `paper-evidence`
|
|
107
|
-
- `differential-expression`
|
|
108
|
-
- `scrna-preprocessing`
|
|
109
|
-
- `cell-annotation`
|
|
110
|
-
- `pubmed-search`
|
|
111
|
-
- `geo-query`
|
|
112
|
-
- `sequence-analysis`
|
|
113
|
-
- `structural-biology`
|
|
114
|
-
- `bio-visualization`
|
|
115
|
-
- `vector-design`
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
The bio skills are written as execution-oriented references: they specify
|
|
118
|
-
preferred tools, typical commands/code paths, expected artifacts, and boundary
|
|
119
|
-
conditions rather than acting as vague prompt decoration.
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
Bio agents now also carry explicit data-interaction and environment-safety behavior:
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
- they ask users for the minimum decisive data when company or sequencing data is missing
|
|
124
|
-
- they separate required inputs from optional context
|
|
125
|
-
- they prefer `uv` for Python environments
|
|
126
|
-
- they prefer `conda` for mixed native stacks
|
|
127
|
-
- they call out when Windows users realistically need WSL/Linux
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
## Current MCP Set
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
The built-in MCP surface is intentionally tighter now.
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
Default built-ins kept visible:
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
- `websearch`
|
|
136
|
-
- `context7`
|
|
137
|
-
- `grep_app`
|
|
138
|
-
- `browser_puppeteer`
|
|
139
|
-
- `chrome-devtools-mcp`
|
|
140
|
-
- `deepwiki_mcp` (default off)
|
|
141
|
-
- `open_websearch_mcp`
|
|
142
|
-
- `paper_search_mcp`
|
|
143
|
-
- `semantic_scholar_fastmcp`
|
|
144
|
-
|
|
145
|
-
Removed from the built-in visible set:
|
|
146
|
-
|
|
147
|
-
- `arxiv_mcp`
|
|
148
|
-
- `fetch_browser`
|
|
149
|
-
|
|
150
|
-
Rationale:
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
- avoid duplicate capability surfaces
|
|
153
|
-
- keep the MCP list focused
|
|
154
|
-
- leave `deepwiki_mcp` opt-in instead of always-on
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
## OpenCode Compatibility Work
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
Recent migration work has focused on keeping pace with newer OpenCode behavior.
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
Already aligned or hardened:
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
- runtime plugin config discovery with canonical + legacy config compatibility
|
|
163
|
-
- agent registration and protected builtin-agent override handling
|
|
164
|
-
- command discovery:
|
|
165
|
-
- `.opencode/command`
|
|
166
|
-
- `.opencode/commands`
|
|
167
|
-
- ancestor discovery up to worktree root
|
|
168
|
-
- slash-style nested command names
|
|
169
|
-
- `.agents/skills` participation in injection chains
|
|
170
|
-
- MCP merge order and user override behavior
|
|
171
|
-
- todo continuation / compaction / stagnation guard regressions
|
|
172
|
-
|
|
173
|
-
The migration audit reference lives at:
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
175
|
-
- [docs/release/upstream-oh-my-openagent-3.11-plus-audit.md](docs/release/upstream-oh-my-openagent-3.11-plus-audit.md)
|
|
176
|
-
|
|
177
|
-
## Installation Reality
|
|
178
|
-
|
|
179
|
-
This project is still optimized for local-first use
|
|
180
|
-
|
|
181
|
-
|
|
182
|
-
|
|
183
|
-
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
|
|
187
|
-
|
|
188
|
-
|
|
189
|
-
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
|
|
193
|
-
|
|
194
|
-
|
|
195
|
-
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
199
|
-
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
|
|
204
|
-
|
|
205
|
-
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
|
|
211
|
-
|
|
212
|
-
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
216
|
-
|
|
217
|
-
|
|
218
|
-
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
|
|
221
|
-
|
|
222
|
-
|
|
223
|
-
|
|
224
|
-
|
|
225
|
-
- [
|
|
226
|
-
- [
|
|
227
|
-
- [
|
|
228
|
-
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
1
|
+
# OpenAgent Labforge
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
OpenAgent Labforge is an OpenCode plugin fork focused on three things:
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- stronger engineering-oriented orchestration
|
|
6
|
+
- explicit, inspectable child-session delegation
|
|
7
|
+
- bioinformatics-first specialist workflows
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
It is a derivative of `code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent` and keeps upstream
|
|
10
|
+
license/provenance boundaries intact. See [LICENSE.md](LICENSE.md),
|
|
11
|
+
[NOTICE](NOTICE), [THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md](THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md), and
|
|
12
|
+
[docs/licensing.md](docs/licensing.md).
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## What This Fork Is Now
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
This README describes current runtime behavior only.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
The plugin is now centered on:
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- OpenCode-native delegation through `task(subagent_type=...)`
|
|
21
|
+
- stable plugin/agent/MCP injection for newer OpenCode behavior
|
|
22
|
+
- explicit search/doc/code/paper retrieval separation
|
|
23
|
+
- a growing first-party bioinformatics agent and skill stack
|
|
24
|
+
- local-first development and installation
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Current Core Capabilities
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### Engineering orchestration
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
- `sisyphus`: main orchestrator
|
|
31
|
+
- `wase`: fully autonomous orchestrator
|
|
32
|
+
- `hephaestus`: deep coding executor
|
|
33
|
+
- `prometheus`: planner
|
|
34
|
+
- `atlas`: execution coordinator
|
|
35
|
+
- `metis`: pre-planning consultant
|
|
36
|
+
- `momus`: plan reviewer
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
These core agents are being upgraded with stronger engineering behavior:
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- better scope discipline
|
|
41
|
+
- stronger verification expectations
|
|
42
|
+
- more explicit planning and review standards
|
|
43
|
+
- cleaner delegation contracts
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
Current engineering-capability layering:
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
- strong execution + orchestration: `sisyphus`, `wase`
|
|
48
|
+
- strong execution: `hephaestus`
|
|
49
|
+
- strong orchestration: `atlas`
|
|
50
|
+
- strong planning: `prometheus`, `metis`
|
|
51
|
+
- strong review: `momus`
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
This layering is intentional so future de-duplication stays easy if OpenCode
|
|
54
|
+
itself absorbs parts of the same capability set.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### Specialist agents
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
- `explore`: local codebase discovery
|
|
59
|
+
- `librarian`: focused upstream docs / SDK / library research
|
|
60
|
+
- `github-scout`: repository and implementation scouting
|
|
61
|
+
- `tech-scout`: ecosystem / benchmark / launch analysis
|
|
62
|
+
- `article-writer`: public technical writing
|
|
63
|
+
- `scientific-writer`: research-facing technical writing
|
|
64
|
+
- `multimodal-looker`: PDF / image / figure understanding
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
### Bioinformatics stack
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
The fork now has an explicit bioinformatics hierarchy:
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
- main bio entrypoints:
|
|
71
|
+
`bio-orchestrator` for integrated coordination
|
|
72
|
+
`bio-pipeline-operator` for execution-focused work
|
|
73
|
+
- internal specialists used through child-session delegation:
|
|
74
|
+
`bio-methodologist` for computational design / QC / statistics planning
|
|
75
|
+
`wet-lab-designer` for user-executed wet-lab validation planning
|
|
76
|
+
`paper-evidence-synthesizer` for cross-paper evidence matrix and confidence grading
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
This is not limited to generic "analysis". The intended workflow includes:
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
- literature retrieval
|
|
81
|
+
- public dataset discovery
|
|
82
|
+
- computational analysis
|
|
83
|
+
- wet-lab validation design for the user to execute
|
|
84
|
+
- evidence integration
|
|
85
|
+
- specialist reporting
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
## Built-in Skill Direction
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
The built-in skill set now covers both general and bio workflows.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
Examples:
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
- browser / UI / git:
|
|
94
|
+
- `playwright`
|
|
95
|
+
- `frontend-ui-ux`
|
|
96
|
+
- `git-master`
|
|
97
|
+
- document / report:
|
|
98
|
+
- `docx-workbench`
|
|
99
|
+
- `pdf-toolkit`
|
|
100
|
+
- `xlsx-analyst`
|
|
101
|
+
- bioinformatics:
|
|
102
|
+
- `bio-tools`
|
|
103
|
+
- `bio-methods`
|
|
104
|
+
- `wet-lab-design`
|
|
105
|
+
- `bio-pipeline`
|
|
106
|
+
- `paper-evidence`
|
|
107
|
+
- `differential-expression`
|
|
108
|
+
- `scrna-preprocessing`
|
|
109
|
+
- `cell-annotation`
|
|
110
|
+
- `pubmed-search`
|
|
111
|
+
- `geo-query`
|
|
112
|
+
- `sequence-analysis`
|
|
113
|
+
- `structural-biology`
|
|
114
|
+
- `bio-visualization`
|
|
115
|
+
- `vector-design`
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
The bio skills are written as execution-oriented references: they specify
|
|
118
|
+
preferred tools, typical commands/code paths, expected artifacts, and boundary
|
|
119
|
+
conditions rather than acting as vague prompt decoration.
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
Bio agents now also carry explicit data-interaction and environment-safety behavior:
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
- they ask users for the minimum decisive data when company or sequencing data is missing
|
|
124
|
+
- they separate required inputs from optional context
|
|
125
|
+
- they prefer `uv` for Python environments
|
|
126
|
+
- they prefer `conda` for mixed native stacks
|
|
127
|
+
- they call out when Windows users realistically need WSL/Linux
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
## Current MCP Set
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
The built-in MCP surface is intentionally tighter now.
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
Default built-ins kept visible:
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
- `websearch`
|
|
136
|
+
- `context7`
|
|
137
|
+
- `grep_app`
|
|
138
|
+
- `browser_puppeteer`
|
|
139
|
+
- `chrome-devtools-mcp`
|
|
140
|
+
- `deepwiki_mcp` (default off)
|
|
141
|
+
- `open_websearch_mcp`
|
|
142
|
+
- `paper_search_mcp`
|
|
143
|
+
- `semantic_scholar_fastmcp`
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
Removed from the built-in visible set:
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
- `arxiv_mcp`
|
|
148
|
+
- `fetch_browser`
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
Rationale:
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
- avoid duplicate capability surfaces
|
|
153
|
+
- keep the MCP list focused
|
|
154
|
+
- leave `deepwiki_mcp` opt-in instead of always-on
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
## OpenCode Compatibility Work
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
Recent migration work has focused on keeping pace with newer OpenCode behavior.
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
Already aligned or hardened:
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
- runtime plugin config discovery with canonical + legacy config compatibility
|
|
163
|
+
- agent registration and protected builtin-agent override handling
|
|
164
|
+
- command discovery:
|
|
165
|
+
- `.opencode/command`
|
|
166
|
+
- `.opencode/commands`
|
|
167
|
+
- ancestor discovery up to worktree root
|
|
168
|
+
- slash-style nested command names
|
|
169
|
+
- `.agents/skills` participation in injection chains
|
|
170
|
+
- MCP merge order and user override behavior
|
|
171
|
+
- todo continuation / compaction / stagnation guard regressions
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
The migration audit reference lives at:
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
- [docs/release/upstream-oh-my-openagent-3.11-plus-audit.md](docs/release/upstream-oh-my-openagent-3.11-plus-audit.md)
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
## Installation Reality
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
This project is still optimized for local-first use, but there is now a real
|
|
180
|
+
published path for `Windows x64`.
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
Current install reality:
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
- `Windows x64`: published npm package path is available
|
|
185
|
+
- other platforms: local build + local install remains the reliable path
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
Recommended workflow:
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
```bash
|
|
190
|
+
bun run build:skills-catalog
|
|
191
|
+
bun run build
|
|
192
|
+
bun pm pack
|
|
193
|
+
```
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
Then follow:
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
- [docs/guide/installation.md](docs/guide/installation.md)
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
## Reference Repos
|
|
200
|
+
|
|
201
|
+
Local comparison material is kept under `Future/` for migration and design work.
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
Current references include:
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
- upstream `oh-my-openagent`
|
|
206
|
+
- `BioClaw`
|
|
207
|
+
- `Geneclaw`
|
|
208
|
+
- `codex-main`
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
These are local reference trees, not part of the shipped plugin.
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
## Current Priorities
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
The near-term order is:
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
1. finish upstream OpenCode compatibility migration
|
|
217
|
+
2. strengthen engineering execution/orchestration capability in core agents
|
|
218
|
+
3. continue refining the bioinformatics agent + skill stack
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
## Docs
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
- [docs/guide/installation.md](docs/guide/installation.md)
|
|
223
|
+
- [docs/guide/orchestration.md](docs/guide/orchestration.md)
|
|
224
|
+
- [docs/guide/bio-skills.md](docs/guide/bio-skills.md)
|
|
225
|
+
- [docs/guide/bio-paper-autonomous-flow-v1.md](docs/guide/bio-paper-autonomous-flow-v1.md)
|
|
226
|
+
- [docs/reference/configuration.md](docs/reference/configuration.md)
|
|
227
|
+
- [docs/reference/features.md](docs/reference/features.md)
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
## Language Versions
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
- [English](README.md)
|
|
232
|
+
- [简体中文](README.zh-cn.md)
|
|
233
|
+
- [日本語](README.ja.md)
|
|
234
|
+
- [한국어](README.ko.md)
|
|
235
|
+
- [Русский](README.ru.md)
|