@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.13.84 → 0.13.86

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -34,8 +34,12 @@
34
34
  "status": "open",
35
35
  "opened_date": "2026-01-01",
36
36
  "evidence_cves": [
37
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
38
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
37
39
  "CVE-2023-48022",
38
40
  "CVE-2024-0132",
41
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
42
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
39
43
  "CVE-2024-42478",
40
44
  "CVE-2024-42479",
41
45
  "CVE-2024-50050",
@@ -1346,6 +1350,7 @@
1346
1350
  "CVE-2021-39935",
1347
1351
  "CVE-2021-43226",
1348
1352
  "CVE-2021-43798",
1353
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
1349
1354
  "CVE-2022-20775",
1350
1355
  "CVE-2022-37055",
1351
1356
  "CVE-2022-40799",
@@ -1360,6 +1365,7 @@
1360
1365
  "CVE-2023-39780",
1361
1366
  "CVE-2023-41974",
1362
1367
  "CVE-2023-43000",
1368
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
1363
1369
  "CVE-2023-50224",
1364
1370
  "CVE-2023-52163",
1365
1371
  "CVE-2024-0769",
@@ -1369,7 +1375,9 @@
1369
1375
  "CVE-2024-21762",
1370
1376
  "CVE-2024-27199",
1371
1377
  "CVE-2024-27443",
1378
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
1372
1379
  "CVE-2024-37079",
1380
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
1373
1381
  "CVE-2024-42009",
1374
1382
  "CVE-2024-42478",
1375
1383
  "CVE-2024-42479",
@@ -1767,8 +1775,12 @@
1767
1775
  "status": "open",
1768
1776
  "opened_date": "2026-03-15",
1769
1777
  "evidence_cves": [
1778
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
1779
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
1770
1780
  "CVE-2023-48022",
1771
1781
  "CVE-2024-0132",
1782
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
1783
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
1772
1784
  "CVE-2024-42478",
1773
1785
  "CVE-2024-42479",
1774
1786
  "CVE-2024-50050",
@@ -2207,6 +2219,8 @@
2207
2219
  "status": "open",
2208
2220
  "opened_date": "2026-05-13",
2209
2221
  "evidence_cves": [
2222
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
2223
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
2210
2224
  "CVE-2024-50050",
2211
2225
  "CVE-2025-0133",
2212
2226
  "CVE-2025-1094",
@@ -2336,6 +2350,7 @@
2336
2350
  "CVE-2021-39935",
2337
2351
  "CVE-2021-43226",
2338
2352
  "CVE-2021-43798",
2353
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
2339
2354
  "CVE-2022-20775",
2340
2355
  "CVE-2022-37055",
2341
2356
  "CVE-2022-40799",
@@ -2351,6 +2366,7 @@
2351
2366
  "CVE-2023-39780",
2352
2367
  "CVE-2023-41974",
2353
2368
  "CVE-2023-43000",
2369
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
2354
2370
  "CVE-2023-50224",
2355
2371
  "CVE-2023-52163",
2356
2372
  "CVE-2024-0132",
@@ -2361,7 +2377,9 @@
2361
2377
  "CVE-2024-21762",
2362
2378
  "CVE-2024-27199",
2363
2379
  "CVE-2024-27443",
2380
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
2364
2381
  "CVE-2024-37079",
2382
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
2365
2383
  "CVE-2024-42009",
2366
2384
  "CVE-2024-42478",
2367
2385
  "CVE-2024-42479",
@@ -3623,6 +3641,8 @@
3623
3641
  "status": "open",
3624
3642
  "opened_date": "2026-05-13",
3625
3643
  "evidence_cves": [
3644
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
3645
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
3626
3646
  "CVE-2023-48022",
3627
3647
  "CVE-2026-24206",
3628
3648
  "CVE-2026-24207"
@@ -4833,9 +4853,13 @@
4833
4853
  "status": "open",
4834
4854
  "opened_date": "2026-05-15",
4835
4855
  "evidence_cves": [
4856
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
4857
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
4836
4858
  "CVE-2023-48022",
4837
4859
  "CVE-2024-0132",
4838
4860
  "CVE-2024-21762",
4861
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
4862
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
4839
4863
  "CVE-2024-42478",
4840
4864
  "CVE-2024-42479",
4841
4865
  "CVE-2024-50050",
@@ -5359,6 +5383,8 @@
5359
5383
  "evidence_cves": [
5360
5384
  "CVE-2024-0132",
5361
5385
  "CVE-2024-21762",
5386
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
5387
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
5362
5388
  "CVE-2024-42478",
5363
5389
  "CVE-2024-42479",
5364
5390
  "CVE-2024-50050",
@@ -5420,9 +5446,13 @@
5420
5446
  "status": "open",
5421
5447
  "opened_date": "2026-05-17",
5422
5448
  "evidence_cves": [
5449
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
5450
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
5423
5451
  "CVE-2023-48022",
5424
5452
  "CVE-2024-0132",
5425
5453
  "CVE-2024-21762",
5454
+ "CVE-2024-37032",
5455
+ "CVE-2024-39722",
5426
5456
  "CVE-2024-42478",
5427
5457
  "CVE-2024-42479",
5428
5458
  "CVE-2024-50050",
@@ -5725,6 +5755,8 @@
5725
5755
  "opened_date": "2026-05-18",
5726
5756
  "evidence_cves": [
5727
5757
  "CVE-2020-10148",
5758
+ "CVE-2022-1471",
5759
+ "CVE-2023-43654",
5728
5760
  "CVE-2023-48022",
5729
5761
  "CVE-2024-1709",
5730
5762
  "CVE-2026-20182",
@@ -7333,6 +7333,206 @@
7333
7333
  "_auto_imported": false,
7334
7334
  "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
7335
7335
  },
7336
+ "CVE-2023-43654": {
7337
+ "name": "PyTorch TorchServe Management API SSRF to Remote Code Execution (ShellTorch)",
7338
+ "lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
7339
+ "attack_vector": {
7340
+ "description": "PyTorch TorchServe Management API SSRF to Remote Code Execution (ShellTorch): CWE-918 SSRF in the management API. In the ShellTorch chain, an unauthenticated, network-exposed TorchServe management API accepts a remote model configuration and parses it with an unsafe YAML deserializer, yielding full remote code execution on the model server.",
7341
+ "privileges_required": "none (NVD PR:N) — default-configured TorchServe is open and unauthenticated",
7342
+ "complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
7343
+ "ai_factor": "The abused surface is an AI model server (TorchServe, maintained by Amazon and Meta) and the libraries it bundles. The lesson: a model server's management API is a privileged control plane that must authenticate, bind to loopback, and never deserialize untrusted config unsafely — Oligo found thousands of exposed instances at major organizations, so the default-open posture is the real-world exposure."
7344
+ },
7345
+ "framework_coverage": {
7346
+ "NIST-800-53-IA-2": {
7347
+ "covered": true,
7348
+ "adequate": false,
7349
+ "gap": "Authentication is not enforced on the model server's management API; the default deployment is open and network-exposed."
7350
+ },
7351
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
7352
+ "covered": true,
7353
+ "adequate": false,
7354
+ "gap": "Does not track AI model servers and their bundled deserialization libraries as managed, RCE-bearing software."
7355
+ },
7356
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
7357
+ "covered": false,
7358
+ "adequate": false,
7359
+ "gap": "No framework treats the model server's management API + config deserialization as an untrusted, RCE-bearing surface."
7360
+ }
7361
+ },
7362
+ "compliance_exposure_score": {
7363
+ "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 74,
7364
+ "basis": "Model servers are deployed with default-open management planes on trusted-network assumptions; bundled YAML/deserialization libraries are not tracked.",
7365
+ "theater_pattern": "default_open_management_plane"
7366
+ },
7367
+ "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
7368
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
7369
+ "ai_assist_factor": "none",
7370
+ "new_control_requirements": [
7371
+ {
7372
+ "id": "NEW-CTRL-093",
7373
+ "name": "AI-MODEL-SERVER-MANAGEMENT-API-HARDENING",
7374
+ "description": "An AI model server's management API must authenticate every caller, bind to loopback (not all interfaces) by default, restrict model sources to an allow-list (no fetching configs/archives from arbitrary URLs), and parse configuration with safe deserializers (SafeConstructor / no arbitrary type instantiation). Upgrade TorchServe 0.8.2+ and bind the management API to loopback with authentication. The distinguishing test: from an unauthenticated remote client, attempt to register a model from an attacker URL against a staging model server and confirm it is refused and no remote content is fetched or deserialized.",
7375
+ "evidence": "https://github.com/pytorch/serve/security/advisories/GHSA-8fxr-qfr9-p34w",
7376
+ "gap_closes": [
7377
+ "NIST-800-53-IA-2",
7378
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2",
7379
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
7380
+ ]
7381
+ }
7382
+ ],
7383
+ "_auto_imported": false,
7384
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
7385
+ },
7386
+ "CVE-2024-37032": {
7387
+ "name": "Ollama Model Registry Path Traversal Arbitrary File Write RCE (Probllama)",
7388
+ "lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
7389
+ "attack_vector": {
7390
+ "description": "Ollama CWE-22 path traversal via unvalidated model-blob digest: an attacker reaching the Ollama HTTP API (default port 11434) manipulates a path/digest the runtime then uses against the filesystem, writing attacker content to an arbitrary path and achieving RCE.",
7391
+ "privileges_required": "low / network (NVD PR:L) — reachable via the Ollama API + a rogue registry",
7392
+ "complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
7393
+ "ai_factor": "The abused surface is the model-pull / model API of the most widely used local LLM runtime. The lesson: the model-runtime API must validate digests and path parameters and must never be network-exposed to untrusted clients; pulling from untrusted registries is a supply-chain trust decision."
7394
+ },
7395
+ "framework_coverage": {
7396
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
7397
+ "covered": true,
7398
+ "adequate": false,
7399
+ "gap": "Does not track the local-LLM runtime as managed, network-exposed software."
7400
+ },
7401
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10": {
7402
+ "covered": true,
7403
+ "adequate": false,
7404
+ "gap": "Input validation is not applied to model-blob digests / API path parameters in the runtime."
7405
+ },
7406
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
7407
+ "covered": false,
7408
+ "adequate": false,
7409
+ "gap": "No framework treats the model-runtime API's path/digest handling as untrusted input reaching the filesystem."
7410
+ }
7411
+ },
7412
+ "compliance_exposure_score": {
7413
+ "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 72,
7414
+ "basis": "Local-LLM runtimes are run on trusted-network assumptions and rarely tracked; model pulls from arbitrary registries are not gated.",
7415
+ "theater_pattern": "ai_supply_chain_trust"
7416
+ },
7417
+ "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
7418
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
7419
+ "ai_assist_factor": "none",
7420
+ "new_control_requirements": [
7421
+ {
7422
+ "id": "NEW-CTRL-094",
7423
+ "name": "AI-RUNTIME-API-PATH-TRAVERSAL-VALIDATION",
7424
+ "description": "The model-runtime API must validate path-bearing inputs (model-blob digests must be exactly 64-hex SHA256; API route parameters must reject traversal sequences) before touching the filesystem, must not be exposed to untrusted networks (Ollama default port 11434), and must only pull models from trusted registries. Upgrade Ollama to 0.1.34 or later. The distinguishing test: point a staging Ollama at a rogue registry whose manifest carries a traversal digest, and send api/push requests with ../ sequences, and confirm both are rejected without filesystem access.",
7425
+ "evidence": "https://www.wiz.io/blog/probllama-ollama-vulnerability-cve-2024-37032",
7426
+ "gap_closes": [
7427
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2",
7428
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10",
7429
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
7430
+ ]
7431
+ }
7432
+ ],
7433
+ "_auto_imported": false,
7434
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
7435
+ },
7436
+ "CVE-2024-39722": {
7437
+ "name": "Ollama api/push Path Traversal File-Existence Disclosure",
7438
+ "lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
7439
+ "attack_vector": {
7440
+ "description": "Ollama CWE-22 path traversal on the api/push route: an attacker reaching the Ollama HTTP API (default port 11434) manipulates a path/digest the runtime then uses against the filesystem, disclosing which files exist on the host.",
7441
+ "privileges_required": "none (NVD PR:N) — unauthenticated",
7442
+ "complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
7443
+ "ai_factor": "The abused surface is the model-pull / model API of the most widely used local LLM runtime. The lesson: the model-runtime API must validate digests and path parameters and must never be network-exposed to untrusted clients; pulling from untrusted registries is a supply-chain trust decision."
7444
+ },
7445
+ "framework_coverage": {
7446
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
7447
+ "covered": true,
7448
+ "adequate": false,
7449
+ "gap": "Does not track the local-LLM runtime as managed, network-exposed software."
7450
+ },
7451
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10": {
7452
+ "covered": true,
7453
+ "adequate": false,
7454
+ "gap": "Input validation is not applied to model-blob digests / API path parameters in the runtime."
7455
+ },
7456
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
7457
+ "covered": false,
7458
+ "adequate": false,
7459
+ "gap": "No framework treats the model-runtime API's path/digest handling as untrusted input reaching the filesystem."
7460
+ }
7461
+ },
7462
+ "compliance_exposure_score": {
7463
+ "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 68,
7464
+ "basis": "Local-LLM runtimes are run on trusted-network assumptions and rarely tracked; model pulls from arbitrary registries are not gated.",
7465
+ "theater_pattern": "ai_supply_chain_trust"
7466
+ },
7467
+ "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
7468
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
7469
+ "ai_assist_factor": "none",
7470
+ "new_control_requirements": [
7471
+ {
7472
+ "id": "NEW-CTRL-094",
7473
+ "name": "AI-RUNTIME-API-PATH-TRAVERSAL-VALIDATION",
7474
+ "description": "The model-runtime API must validate path-bearing inputs (model-blob digests must be exactly 64-hex SHA256; API route parameters must reject traversal sequences) before touching the filesystem, must not be exposed to untrusted networks (Ollama default port 11434), and must only pull models from trusted registries. Upgrade Ollama to 0.1.46 or later. The distinguishing test: point a staging Ollama at a rogue registry whose manifest carries a traversal digest, and send api/push requests with ../ sequences, and confirm both are rejected without filesystem access.",
7475
+ "evidence": "https://www.oligo.security/blog/more-models-more-probllms",
7476
+ "gap_closes": [
7477
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2",
7478
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10",
7479
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
7480
+ ]
7481
+ }
7482
+ ],
7483
+ "_auto_imported": false,
7484
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
7485
+ },
7486
+ "CVE-2022-1471": {
7487
+ "name": "SnakeYAML Constructor Unsafe Deserialization RCE (ShellTorch chain)",
7488
+ "lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
7489
+ "attack_vector": {
7490
+ "description": "SnakeYAML Constructor Unsafe Deserialization RCE (ShellTorch chain): CWE-502 unsafe YAML deserialization. In the ShellTorch chain, an unauthenticated, network-exposed TorchServe management API accepts a remote model configuration and parses it with an unsafe YAML deserializer, yielding full remote code execution on the model server.",
7491
+ "privileges_required": "none for services parsing untrusted YAML (NVD PR:N; CNA Google PR:L)",
7492
+ "complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
7493
+ "ai_factor": "The abused surface is an AI model server (TorchServe, maintained by Amazon and Meta) and the libraries it bundles. The lesson: a model server's management API is a privileged control plane that must authenticate, bind to loopback, and never deserialize untrusted config unsafely — Oligo found thousands of exposed instances at major organizations, so the default-open posture is the real-world exposure."
7494
+ },
7495
+ "framework_coverage": {
7496
+ "NIST-800-53-IA-2": {
7497
+ "covered": true,
7498
+ "adequate": false,
7499
+ "gap": "Authentication is not enforced on the model server's management API; the default deployment is open and network-exposed."
7500
+ },
7501
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
7502
+ "covered": true,
7503
+ "adequate": false,
7504
+ "gap": "Does not track AI model servers and their bundled deserialization libraries as managed, RCE-bearing software."
7505
+ },
7506
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
7507
+ "covered": false,
7508
+ "adequate": false,
7509
+ "gap": "No framework treats the model server's management API + config deserialization as an untrusted, RCE-bearing surface."
7510
+ }
7511
+ },
7512
+ "compliance_exposure_score": {
7513
+ "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
7514
+ "basis": "Model servers are deployed with default-open management planes on trusted-network assumptions; bundled YAML/deserialization libraries are not tracked.",
7515
+ "theater_pattern": "default_open_management_plane"
7516
+ },
7517
+ "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
7518
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
7519
+ "ai_assist_factor": "none",
7520
+ "new_control_requirements": [
7521
+ {
7522
+ "id": "NEW-CTRL-093",
7523
+ "name": "AI-MODEL-SERVER-MANAGEMENT-API-HARDENING",
7524
+ "description": "An AI model server's management API must authenticate every caller, bind to loopback (not all interfaces) by default, restrict model sources to an allow-list (no fetching configs/archives from arbitrary URLs), and parse configuration with safe deserializers (SafeConstructor / no arbitrary type instantiation). Upgrade SnakeYAML 2.0+ (SafeConstructor default) or construct parsers with SafeConstructor. The distinguishing test: from an unauthenticated remote client, attempt to register a model from an attacker URL against a staging model server and confirm it is refused and no remote content is fetched or deserialized.",
7525
+ "evidence": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1471",
7526
+ "gap_closes": [
7527
+ "NIST-800-53-IA-2",
7528
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-2",
7529
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
7530
+ ]
7531
+ }
7532
+ ],
7533
+ "_auto_imported": false,
7534
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
7535
+ },
7336
7536
  "CVE-2025-34291": {
7337
7537
  "name": "Langflow Account Takeover + RCE (CORS / refresh-token chain)",
7338
7538
  "lesson_date": "2026-05-24",