@bastani/atomic 0.9.16-alpha.7 → 0.9.16-alpha.9

package/dist/builtin/workflows/builtin/goal-reverify.ts

@@ -1,305 +0,0 @@
-import { Type } from "typebox";
-import type {
-	WorkflowRunContext,
-	WorkflowSerializableValue,
-	WorkflowTaskResult,
-} from "../src/shared/types.js";
-import {
-	build_scoring_prompt,
-	scoring_prompt_reads,
-	type ScoringCandidate,
-	type SharedHead,
-} from "./verification-prompts.js";
-import { VERIFICATION_SCALE } from "./verification-criteria.js";
-import type {
-	ConsolidatableFinding,
-	ConsolidatedFinding,
-} from "./review-convergence.js";
-
-/** Confidence values strictly below this threshold can enter re-verification. */
-export const DEFAULT_REVERIFY_THRESHOLD = 0.7;
-
-const STANDARD_CONFIRM_THRESHOLD = 10;
-const REQUIRED_CONFIRM_THRESHOLD = 6;
-const DEFAULT_REPEATS = 3;
-const REVERIFY_QUESTION =
-	"Assess this specific finding against the code it cites: is it a real, objective-relevant, currently-unresolved blocker?";
-
-/** The finding fields needed by the re-verification door. */
-export type ReverifiableFinding = ConsolidatableFinding & {
-	readonly body?: string;
-	readonly confidence_score?: number;
-};
-
-export type ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding = ConsolidatedFinding<ReverifiableFinding>;
-
-export type ReverifyResult = {
-	readonly verdict: "confirmed" | "demoted";
-	readonly meanScore: number;
-	readonly perRepeat: readonly (number | null)[];
-	readonly evidence: readonly string[];
-};
-
-/** Audit evidence retained alongside the original consolidated finding. */
-export type ReverifyAuditEntry<F extends ReverifiableFinding = ReverifiableFinding> = {
-	readonly finding: ConsolidatedFinding<F>;
-	readonly verdict: ReverifyResult["verdict"];
-	readonly meanScore: number;
-	readonly perRepeat: readonly (number | null)[];
-	readonly evidence: readonly string[];
-};
-
-export type ReverifyContext = Pick<WorkflowRunContext, "task">;
-
-export type ReverifyBatchResult<F extends ReverifiableFinding = ReverifiableFinding> = {
-	readonly batch: readonly ConsolidatedFinding<F>[];
-	readonly audits: readonly ReverifyAuditEntry<F>[];
-};
-
-export type ReverifyBatchInput<F extends ReverifiableFinding = ReverifiableFinding> = {
-	readonly batch: readonly ConsolidatedFinding<F>[];
-	readonly context: {
-		readonly objective: string;
-		readonly candidateRefs: readonly string[];
-	};
-	readonly repeats?: number;
-	readonly threshold?: number;
-};
-
-const reverifySchema = Type.Object(
-	{
-		score: VERIFICATION_SCALE.schema,
-		evidence: Type.Array(Type.String()),
-	},
-	{ additionalProperties: false },
-);
-
-type ReverifyReport = {
-	readonly score: number;
-	readonly evidence: readonly string[];
-};
-
-function isRecord(value: WorkflowSerializableValue | undefined): value is Record<string, WorkflowSerializableValue> {
-	return typeof value === "object" && value !== null && !Array.isArray(value);
-}
-
-function isStringArray(value: WorkflowSerializableValue | undefined): value is readonly string[] {
-	return Array.isArray(value) && value.every((item) => typeof item === "string");
-}
-
-function parseReport(result: WorkflowTaskResult): ReverifyReport | undefined {
-	if (!isRecord(result.structured)) return undefined;
-	const score = result.structured.score;
-	if (
-		typeof score !== "number" ||
-		!Number.isInteger(score) ||
-		score < VERIFICATION_SCALE.min ||
-		score > VERIFICATION_SCALE.max
-	) {
-		return undefined;
-	}
-	const evidence = result.structured.evidence;
-	return {
-		score,
-		evidence: isStringArray(evidence) ? evidence : [],
-	};
-}
-
-function requiredByObjective(finding: ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding): boolean {
-	return finding.finding.objective_alignment === "required_by_objective";
-}
-
-/**
- * Pure eligibility predicate. Missing confidence is deliberately ineligible:
- * an absent graded signal is doubt, and doubt remains blocking.
- */
-export function is_reverifiable(
-	finding: ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding,
-	threshold = DEFAULT_REVERIFY_THRESHOLD,
-): boolean {
-	const confidence = finding.finding.confidence_score;
-	return (
-		finding.blocking &&
-		finding.reviewers.length === 1 &&
-		typeof confidence === "number" &&
-		Number.isFinite(confidence) &&
-		confidence < threshold &&
-		finding.finding.objective_alignment !== "beyond_objective" &&
-		finding.finding.objective_alignment !== "contradicts_objective"
-	);
-}
-
-function readPaths(
-	finding: ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding,
-	candidateRefs: readonly string[],
-): readonly string[] {
-	const codePath = finding.finding.code_location?.absolute_file_path;
-	return [
-		...(codePath === undefined ? [] : [codePath]),
-		...candidateRefs,
-	];
-}
-
-function promptFor(
-	finding: ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding,
-	context: ReverifyBatchInput["context"],
-): { readonly prompt: string; readonly reads: readonly string[] } {
-	const codePath = finding.finding.code_location?.absolute_file_path;
-	const candidate: ScoringCandidate = {
-		...(codePath === undefined ? {} : { path: codePath }),
-		body: [
-			`Title: ${finding.finding.title}`,
-			`Body: ${finding.finding.body ?? ""}`,
-			`Code location: ${codePath ?? "not supplied"}`,
-		].join("\n"),
-	};
-	const head: SharedHead = {
-		task: `${REVERIFY_QUESTION}\n\nObjective:\n${context.objective}`,
-		groundTruthNote: `The objective is the contract. Verify the finding against observed code, not reviewer narration.`,
-		candidates: [candidate],
-		outputFormat: "Call structured_output with score (an integer from 1 to 20) and evidence (an array of observed, concise reasons).",
-	};
-	const prompt = build_scoring_prompt(head, {
-		id: "finding_reverification",
-		name: "Finding re-verification",
-		description: REVERIFY_QUESTION,
-	});
-	return {
-		prompt,
-		reads: [
-			...readPaths(finding, context.candidateRefs),
-			...scoring_prompt_reads(head),
-		],
-	};
-}
-
-async function runRepeat(
-	ctx: ReverifyContext,
-	finding: ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding,
-	context: ReverifyBatchInput["context"],
-	stageName: string,
-): Promise<ReverifyReport | undefined> {
-	try {
-		const rendered = promptFor(finding, context);
-		const options = {
-			prompt: rendered.prompt,
-			context: "fresh" as const,
-			reads: rendered.reads,
-			schema: reverifySchema,
-		};
-		return parseReport(await ctx.task(stageName, options));
-	} catch {
-		return undefined;
-	}
-}
-
-/**
- * Re-score one eligible finding in K independent fresh contexts.
- *
- * A zero-valid-repeat mean is the deterministic sentinel `0`, matching the
- * verification criteria module's empty-mean convention. It never authorizes a
- * demotion because the quorum checks below require at least one valid score.
- */
-export async function reverify_finding(
-	ctx: ReverifyContext,
-	input: {
-		readonly finding: ReverifiableConsolidatedFinding;
-		readonly context: {
-			readonly objective: string;
-			readonly candidateRefs: readonly string[];
-		};
-		repeats?: number;
-		threshold?: number;
-	},
-): Promise<ReverifyResult> {
-	if (!is_reverifiable(input.finding, input.threshold)) {
-		throw new Error("Cannot re-verify an ineligible finding.");
-	}
-
-	const repeatCount = Number.isFinite(input.repeats) && input.repeats !== undefined
-		? Math.max(0, Math.floor(input.repeats))
-		: DEFAULT_REPEATS;
-	const perRepeat: Array<number | null> = [];
-	const evidence: string[] = [];
-	const validScores: number[] = [];
-	for (let repeat = 1; repeat <= repeatCount; repeat += 1) {
-		let report = await runRepeat(ctx, input.finding, input.context, `reverify-${repeat}`);
-		if (report === undefined) {
-			report = await runRepeat(ctx, input.finding, input.context, `reverify-${repeat}-reask`);
-		}
-		if (report === undefined) {
-			perRepeat.push(null);
-			evidence.push(
-				`Re-verification repeat ${repeat} was invalid after one re-ask; doubt defaults to confirmed.`,
-			);
-			continue;
-		}
-		perRepeat.push(report.score);
-		validScores.push(report.score);
-		if (report.evidence.length === 0) {
-			evidence.push(`Re-verification repeat ${repeat} scored ${report.score}/20.`);
-		} else {
-			evidence.push(...report.evidence);
-		}
-	}
-
-	const meanScore = validScores.length === 0
-		? 0
-		: validScores.reduce((total, score) => total + score, 0) / validScores.length;
-	const validCount = validScores.length;
-	const requiredQuorum = Math.ceil(repeatCount / 2);
-	const demoted = requiredByObjective(input.finding)
-		? repeatCount > 0 && validCount === repeatCount && meanScore < REQUIRED_CONFIRM_THRESHOLD
-		: validCount > 0 && validCount >= requiredQuorum && meanScore < STANDARD_CONFIRM_THRESHOLD;
-	return {
-		verdict: demoted ? "demoted" : "confirmed",
-		meanScore,
-		perRepeat,
-		evidence,
-	};
-}
-
-function auditKey<F extends ReverifiableFinding>(finding: ConsolidatedFinding<F>): string {
-	return JSON.stringify([
-		finding.finding.code_location?.absolute_file_path ?? "",
-		finding.finding.title,
-		finding.reviewers,
-	]);
-}
-
-/** Apply only evidence-backed demotions; the original finding remains present. */
-export function apply_reverify_results<F extends ReverifiableFinding>(
-	batch: readonly ConsolidatedFinding<F>[],
-	audits: readonly ReverifyAuditEntry<F>[],
-): ReverifyBatchResult<F> {
-	const demoted = new Set(
-		audits
-			.filter((audit) => audit.verdict === "demoted")
-			.map((audit) => auditKey(audit.finding)),
-	);
-	return {
-		batch: batch.map((entry) =>
-			demoted.has(auditKey(entry)) ? { ...entry, blocking: false } : entry,
-		),
-		audits,
-	};
-}
-
-/** Re-verify only eligible entries and return the batch plus durable audit data. */
-export async function reverify_consolidated_batch<F extends ReverifiableFinding>(
-	ctx: ReverifyContext,
-	input: ReverifyBatchInput<F>,
-): Promise<ReverifyBatchResult<F>> {
-	const audits: ReverifyAuditEntry<F>[] = [];
-	for (const entry of input.batch) {
-		if (!is_reverifiable(entry, input.threshold)) continue;
-		const result = await reverify_finding(ctx, {
-			finding: entry,
-			context: input.context,
-			repeats: input.repeats,
-			threshold: input.threshold,
-		});
-		audits.push({ finding: entry, ...result });
-	}
-	return apply_reverify_results(input.batch, audits);
-}

package/dist/builtin/workflows/builtin/goal-review.ts

@@ -1,139 +0,0 @@
-import type { WorkflowTaskResult } from "../src/shared/types.js";
-import type { ReviewDecision, ReviewRecord } from "./goal-types.js";
-import {
-  finalActionRemaining,
-  parseFailureDiagnostics,
-  summarizeReviewConvergence,
-  type ParsedReviewDecision,
-} from "./review-convergence.js";
-
-export function reviewDecisionFromResult(result: WorkflowTaskResult): ReviewDecision | undefined {
-  return result.structured as ReviewDecision | undefined;
-}
-
-export function parsedReviewDecisionFromResult(
-  result: WorkflowTaskResult,
-  reviewer: string,
-): ParsedReviewDecision<ReviewDecision> {
-  const parsed = reviewDecisionFromResult(result);
-  if (parsed !== undefined) {
-    return { decision: parsed, parsed: true, diagnostics: [] };
-  }
-  const diagnostics = parseFailureDiagnostics(reviewer, result.text);
-  return {
-    decision: reviewerErrorDecision(diagnostics.join("\n")),
-    parsed: false,
-    diagnostics,
-  };
-}
-
-/**
- * Deterministic single-reviewer approval gate.
- *
- * The reviewer's self-reported `stop_review_loop` boolean is the single
- * authoritative convergence signal: the harness does not recompute approval
- * from findings arrays, priorities, or requirements_traceability statuses.
- * Those fields remain required audit evidence for humans and later stages,
- * and the reviewer prompt instructs the model how to derive the flag from
- * them — but the gate itself trusts the boolean.
- *
- * Two hard guards remain: a reviewer execution failure (`reviewer_error`)
- * never approves, and unparsed reviewer output is synthesized upstream as a
- * `stop_review_loop: false` decision, so parse failures never approve either.
- */
-export function reviewApproved(decision: ReviewDecision): boolean {
-  return decision.stop_review_loop === true && decision.reviewer_error == null;
-}
-
-export function reviewerErrorDecision(message: string): ReviewDecision {
-  return {
-    findings: [],
-    overall_correctness: "patch is incorrect",
-    overall_explanation:
-      "Reviewer execution failed, so the review gate cannot safely approve the current repository state.",
-    overall_confidence_score: 0,
-    goal_oracle_satisfied: false,
-    requirements_traceability: [],
-    receipt_assessment:
-      "No reviewer receipt could be produced because reviewer execution failed.",
-    verification_remaining: "Recover reviewer execution and re-run oracle validation.",
-    stop_review_loop: false,
-    reviewer_error: {
-      kind: "reviewer_failure",
-      message,
-      attempted_recovery:
-        "Model fallbacks were configured for the reviewer stage; continuing the bounded loop without approval.",
-    },
-  };
-}
-
-export function blockerFromReviewDecision(decision: ReviewDecision): string | null {
-  const reviewerError = decision.reviewer_error;
-  if (reviewerError == null) return null;
-  if (
-    reviewerError.kind !== "dependency_unavailable" &&
-    reviewerError.kind !== "tool_failure"
-  ) {
-    return null;
-  }
-  const blocker = reviewerError.message.trim();
-  return blocker.length > 0 ? blocker : null;
-}
-
-export function reviewDecisionToRecord(args: {
-  readonly turn: number;
-  readonly reviewer: string;
-  readonly artifactPath: string;
-  readonly decision: ReviewDecision;
-  readonly parsed: boolean;
-  readonly diagnostics: readonly string[];
-  readonly allowFinalActionRemaining: boolean;
-}): ReviewRecord {
-  const blocker = blockerFromReviewDecision(args.decision);
-  const approved = reviewApproved(args.decision);
-  const hasFinalActionRemaining = args.allowFinalActionRemaining &&
-    finalActionRemaining(args.decision.requirements_traceability);
-  const verificationGap = args.decision.verification_remaining.trim();
-  const traceabilityGaps = args.decision.requirements_traceability
-    .filter((entry) => entry.status !== "proven")
-    .map((entry) => `${entry.status}: ${entry.requirement} — ${entry.evidence}`);
-  const gaps = [
-    ...args.decision.findings.map((finding) =>
-      `[${finding.objective_alignment}] ${finding.title}: ${finding.body}`
-    ),
-    ...traceabilityGaps,
-    ...(approved || verificationGap.length === 0 ? [] : [verificationGap]),
-    ...(args.decision.reviewer_error == null
-      ? []
-      : [`${args.decision.reviewer_error.kind}: ${args.decision.reviewer_error.message}`]),
-  ];
-
-  const nextAction = approved
-    ? hasFinalActionRemaining ? "pull-request" : "finish"
-    : blocker === null ? "implementation" : "blocked";
-  const convergenceDecision = summarizeReviewConvergence({
-    parsed: args.parsed,
-    approved,
-    stopReviewLoop: args.decision.stop_review_loop,
-    nextAction,
-    finalActionRemaining: approved && hasFinalActionRemaining,
-    diagnostics: args.diagnostics,
-  });
-
-  return {
-    ...args.decision,
-    decision: approved ? "complete" : blocker === null ? "continue" : "blocked",
-    evidence: [args.decision.receipt_assessment, args.decision.overall_explanation],
-    gaps,
-    blocker,
-    confidence_score: args.decision.overall_confidence_score,
-    explanation: args.decision.overall_explanation,
-    turn: args.turn,
-    reviewer: args.reviewer,
-    artifact_path: args.artifactPath,
-    parsed: args.parsed,
-    approved,
-    parse_diagnostics: args.diagnostics,
-    convergence_decision: convergenceDecision,
-  };
-}