@bastani/atomic 0.9.13 → 0.9.14-alpha.2

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/new-work.md

@@ -1,34 +1,34 @@
 # New visual work
 
-Use this flow when making a new surface or replacing a visual identity. PRODUCT.md owns product truth. DESIGN.md owns durable visual decisions. A surface brief keeps strategy that belongs only to one route or artifact. Complete [init.md](init.md) first when PRODUCT.md is missing; a missing DESIGN.md does not route back to init.
+Use this flow for a new surface or a replacement visual identity. PRODUCT.md owns product truth. DESIGN.md owns durable visual decisions. A surface brief keeps strategy that belongs to one route or artifact. Complete [init.md](init.md) first when PRODUCT.md is missing; a missing DESIGN.md does not route back to init.
 
 ## 1. Decide what is already true
 
 Read DESIGN.md, representative code, tokens, components, and assets.
 
 - **Redesign:** preserve product truth, content, function, constraints, and explicit brand commitments; replace the old visual world rather than polishing it. The old look is evidence of what the subject is, not authority over what it becomes.
-- **Established world:** inherit it. A missing DESIGN.md does not erase a coherent identity already present in code; document that identity instead of inventing a replacement.
-- **Incomplete brand:** preserve confirmed assets and recognizable traits, then help the user expand the system for this new surface.
+- **Established world:** inherit it. A missing DESIGN.md does not erase a coherent identity already in code; document that identity instead of inventing a replacement.
+- **Incomplete brand:** preserve confirmed assets and recognizable traits, then expand the system with the user for this surface.
 - **No visual authority:** create a new world with the user.
 
-A section, component, feature, or state inside an established surface inherits that surface. Do not turn a local addition into a new identity exercise.
+A section, component, feature, or state inside an established surface inherits that surface. Never turn a local addition into a new identity exercise.
 
 ## 2. Ask what will change the work
 
 Ask one round of two or three related questions through the structured question tool when available. Skip settled facts; a precise request may need only a compact confirmation.
 
-- **Persuade:** clarify who must act, what they should believe, and which real proof, content, or assets can earn that belief.
-- **Operate:** clarify the task, information, important states, frequency, and constraints.
-- **Read:** clarify the reader's question, source material, structure, and wayfinding.
-- **Experience:** clarify what leads, how exploration unfolds, and which interaction or transition matters.
+- **Persuade:** who must act, what they should believe, which real proof, content, or assets earn that belief.
+- **Operate:** the task, information, important states, frequency, constraints.
+- **Read:** the reader's question, source material, structure, wayfinding.
+- **Experience:** what leads, how exploration unfolds, which interaction or transition matters.
 
-Across modes, ask what success looks like, what must remain untouched, and what would make a polished result feel wrong. Do not ask for CSS values or canned aesthetic lanes.
+Across modes, ask what success looks like, what must remain untouched, and what would make a polished result feel wrong. Never ask for CSS values or canned aesthetic lanes.
 
 ## 3. Choose the right amount of invention
 
 ### Extend an existing surface
 
-Inherit its world and composition. Resolve only the new purpose, content, hierarchy, states, interaction, and how the addition joins the surrounding experience. Do not run a concept tournament or change DESIGN.md unless the user approves a durable system change.
+Inherit its world and composition. Resolve only the new purpose, content, hierarchy, states, interaction, and how the addition joins the surrounding experience. No concept tournament, and no DESIGN.md change unless the user approves a durable system change.
 
 ### Create a whole surface inside an established world
 
@@ -36,21 +36,23 @@ Keep the visual system fixed. Derive five to seven materially different structur
 
 `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/concept-seed.mjs --scope surface --mode <mode>`
 
-The script assigns which structure gets built: your top-ranked structure is what every run would ship, and a single ranking is deterministic, so the dice come from outside. Dress its staging challengers in the committed identity and weigh them against your list before building. Never run the script for a local extension or a precisely specified narrow request; shape those directly.
+The script deals three of your structures; the dice pick which three reach the user, breaking the ranking rut while the user keeps a real choice. Present them on the decision page as full cards of equal salience, the dealt lead under kicker THE ROLL, with steer and re-roll; the user locks one. No canon card and no pick card at surface scope: the world is settled, so every card visualizes composition, not identity. With image generation and a comp-led default (`.impeccable/config.json`; the build-path paragraph below), each card declares a `comp` under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/`, generated after serving, in reading order, under [visualize.md](visualize.md)'s comp discipline. Anchor each comp on the established identity: pass a screenshot of a representative existing page as a reference image (the harness image tool's input image, or `generate-image.mjs --ref`) with a prompt that leads with the new surface's structure and names DESIGN.md's palette, type, and component character; prose paraphrases of a design system drift, pixel references do not. Without image generation, or under a code-led default, each card carries a `wireframe` schematic (`serve-question.mjs --schema`) the page draws itself. Locking a card is the approval and sets the build path: a locked comp builds comp-led with that comp as the approved comp, discharging [visualize.md](visualize.md)'s three-option round with no second approval point; a locked wireframe builds code-led, its ambition carried by the direction contract. Never run the script for a local extension or a precisely specified narrow request; shape those directly.
 
 ### Create or replace the visual world
 
-1. Name the product's unique mechanism in one sentence, the audience's real scene, its cultural home, and what this first surface must prove. Note the page this category always ships and its predictable opposite; name both as the rut and keep them out of the seven-candidate list, so no die face is spent on the page the category already ships. A brief that paints its own picture, a product name, a titled artifact, a governing metaphor, adds its literal reading to the rut: spend at most one candidate on it and derive the rest from elsewhere in the audience's world.
-2. From that cultural world, list seven concrete visual systems, artifacts, places, or rituals the audience knows by heart, each with one line on why it resonates and can carry the mechanism, ordered by resonance. The audience's world includes its graphic and screen traditions, the notation, publications, identity programs, data graphics, and interfaces it reads daily, not only its physical objects; a nameable abstract system (a school of poster, a documentation standard, a data-graphic tradition) is as concrete a candidate as any artifact. What would this thing look like as a physical object; what did its world look like before the web? Near-duplicates count once. When more than three of the seven share one material family, the derivation stopped at the subject's most obvious artifact; the audience's world is larger than that, so dig until the list spans at least three families.
+1. Name the product's unique mechanism in one sentence, the audience's real scene, its cultural home, and what this first surface must prove. Note the page this category always ships and its predictable opposite; both are the rut, kept out of the seven-candidate list. A brief that paints its own picture, a product name, a titled artifact, a governing metaphor, adds its literal reading to the rut: spend at most one candidate on it and derive the rest from elsewhere in the audience's world.
+2. From that cultural world, list seven concrete visual systems, artifacts, places, or rituals the audience knows by heart, each with one line on why it resonates and can carry the mechanism, ordered by resonance. The audience's world includes its graphic and screen traditions, not only its physical objects: the notation, publications, identity programs, data graphics, and interfaces it reads daily. A nameable abstract system (a school of poster, a documentation standard) is as concrete a candidate as any artifact. What would this thing look like as a physical object; what did its world look like before the web? Near-duplicates count once. When more than three of the seven share one material family, the derivation stopped at the subject's most obvious artifact; dig until the list spans at least three families.
 3. Turn that material into complete directions: each joins a reusable visual world to a concrete first-surface experience.
-4. Run `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/concept-seed.mjs --scope direction --mode <mode>` and follow what it prints. This step has no substitute and no skip condition: on a new or replacement world, writing artifact code before this script has run and its assignment is acknowledged is a contract violation, whatever the harness, the model, or the time pressure, because the roll is the mechanism that keeps every run from converging on the category default. The script assigns which direction gets built and deals catalog challengers. Fuse each challenger before judging it: the challenger supplies the form and its system grammar, the product supplies every fact, and clarity wins conflicts. Weigh fused challengers against the assigned direction on exactly two axes, audience identification and product clarity; losing to strong grounded material is a valid outcome, and beating a thin or tool-monoculture list is the point.
-5. Present one direction, fully committed: its world, first viewport, visitor path, signature interaction, cross-surface reach, and honest risk. Alongside it, offer the hand's challengers as named alternates, the weighing's verdict written on each as its one-line case, an honest "fuses poorly because X" included; the weighing informs the user's choice, it never pre-empts it. A hand holds at most three challengers: when the roll deals more, the three strongest join the hand and the rest wait in the re-roll pool, noted in one line; dropping a challenger from the hand itself takes a named product-truth failure, disclosed. Add re-roll with an optional one-line steer. What you never present is a ranked menu of your own grounded candidates; a lineup of those invites the safest card, while dealt challengers carry no such rut. The two channels share this structure and differ only in richness: cards and boards on the decision page, names and one-liners through the structured tool; the structured tool's option list also carries the standing exit as its last option.
+4. Run `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/concept-seed.mjs --scope direction --mode <mode>` and follow what it prints. This step has no substitute and no skip condition: on a new or replacement world, writing artifact code before this script has run and its assignment is acknowledged is a contract violation, whatever the harness, the model, or the time pressure; the roll is what keeps every run from converging on the category default. The script assigns the direction to build and deals catalog challengers. Fuse each challenger before judging it: the challenger supplies the form and its system grammar, the product supplies every fact, clarity wins conflicts. Weigh fused challengers against the assigned direction on exactly two axes, audience identification and product clarity. Losing to strong grounded material is a valid outcome; beating a thin or tool-monoculture list is the point. Close with a verdict per challenger, decided before any borrowing: wins (beats the assigned direction on both axes; becomes the build candidate), competitive (holds one axis; stays a full alternate), or declined (loses both). A declined challenger is not spent: name the one discipline of its system the assigned direction lacks, and raise the assigned direction to match before presenting it. A donation transfers ambition and system discipline (a palette's total commitment, a grid's density courage, a form's structural honesty), never the challenger's clothes; a lifted motif is a costume note, not a raise, and one world owns the page. Write each raise into the presented direction as its own line, named for its donor; a raise nobody can read did not happen.
+5. Present one direction, fully committed and already raised by the hand it beat, raises visible as named lines: world, first viewport, visitor path, signature interaction, cross-surface reach, honest risk. Route each challenger by verdict: winning and competitive challengers are full alternates with their QUALITY BAR cards and one-line case; declined challengers render demoted, compact and quiet, each carrying its verdict and what the direction kept from it, never full-size, never silently dropped, still adoptable on request. The verdict informs the user's choice, never pre-empts it; the demoted row is the hand's proof of judgment. A hand holds at most three full-card challengers: when the roll deals more, the three strongest join and the rest wait in the re-roll pool, noted in one line; dropping a challenger from the hand itself takes a named product-truth failure, disclosed. Add one card for your own top-ranked grounded candidate when it is not the assigned direction, kicker IMPECCABLE’S PICK, same anatomy as every card, with an honest risk line naming its familiarity when true: the strongest grounded direction is often where most runs in this category land, and the user deciding that trade is the point of showing it. Familiar and effective is a legitimate destination, not a failure of nerve; the pick card and the standing exit serve it at two depths. One pick card, never two, never a ranked list: a lineup of your candidates hands selection back to a taste function and invites the safest card. The pick never takes the lead position; when the dice assign your top candidate there is no pick card, and the assigned card notes it topped your list. Add re-roll with an optional one-line steer, in three registers: plain (a fresh hand, same spread), safer (your remaining conventional grounded candidates plus the canon against named competitors), bolder (foreign forms only, at full commitment). The register is the user's steering on the familiar-to-bold axis, never yours to pre-select; when the answer carries one, re-run the seed with `--register <value>` and the next `--reroll` round, and follow what it prints. A user saying "bolder" or "safer" while a direction round is open means these registers, never the bolder or harden commands. The two channels share this structure and differ only in richness: cards and boards on the decision page, names and one-liners through the structured tool, whose option list carries the assigned direction, the pick, the winning and competitive challengers, and the standing exit last; declined challengers fold into the assigned option's description as their kept lines, so the raise survives the text channel.
 
-The standing exit: every direction round offers one quiet, permanent alternative, the category standard, played straight. It is the user's door, never yours: never recommend it, never weigh it against the roll, never let it soften the dealt directions; the counterweights bind the unchosen default, not the chosen one. When the user takes it, in the canon action, a safer-steer, or plain words asking for the familiar or competitor-like path, convention becomes the commitment: ask once for two or three products this should sit alongside, make their craft level the bar, and execute the canon at full fidelity, without irony or smuggled quirk. A standing preference gets recorded as a brand commitment in PRODUCT.md. Re-roll eliminates every direction already shown, grounded and challenger alike; after two consecutive re-rolls, ask what quality is missing. You may re-roll on your own only on named factual grounds, when the assigned direction cannot carry the product's truth or task; taste is never grounds. The user may re-roll freely, and a user- or brief-pinned direction beats the roll, always. Present the decision visually: write an options payload with the assigned direction leading, the dealt challengers as alternates carrying their QUALITY BAR cards, and re-roll, steer, plus canon enabled; a degraded roll with no challengers still uses the page, as a single text-only card with re-roll. Give every card the same anatomy, thesis, palette, materials, first viewport, honest risk, and the challengers' case lines (run the script with `--schema` for the exact shape); the page renders identity from these fields, so a grounded direction is never a wall of text against rendered art, and a challenger's catalog image rides as labeled inspiration, never as the promise of the build. Author `canonCard` too: the category standard as one honest card with the same anatomy; the page keeps it subordinate, and the counterweights still bind you, so it is never yours to recommend. Run `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/serve-question.mjs --start --payload <file>` (run it with `--schema` first for the exact payload shape). It daemonizes, prints the page URL and a key, and exits immediately; now open that URL for the user, in-app browser first, then the system opener, then showing the URL. Collect the choice with `--wait --key <key>`, repeating while it exits 3; the ANSWER prints as JSON. Exit 4 means the page was closed without an answer: re-present once through the structured question tool, and with no answer there either, proceed unattended with the assigned direction and state the assumptions. A harness that can leave a shell blocked in the background may instead run the script without `--start` and let it auto-open and block. Only a session where no browser can open at all, headless, CI, an eval worker, a remote shell with no display, puts the same decision through the structured question tool instead; the script self-detects these environments and exits 2 with that advice, so treat exit 2 as this fallback, never as an error to retry.
+The standing exit: every direction round offers one quiet, permanent alternative, the category standard, played straight. It is the user's door, never yours: never recommend it, never weigh it against the roll, never let it soften the dealt directions; the counterweights bind the unchosen default, not the chosen one. When the user takes it (the canon action, a safer-steer, or plain words asking for the familiar or competitor-like path), convention becomes the commitment: ask once for two or three products this should sit alongside, make their craft level the bar, and execute the canon at full fidelity, without irony or smuggled quirk. Record a standing preference as a brand commitment in PRODUCT.md. Re-roll eliminates every direction already shown, grounded and challenger alike; after two consecutive re-rolls, ask what quality is missing. Re-roll on your own only on named factual grounds, when the assigned direction cannot carry the product's truth or task; taste is never grounds. The user may re-roll freely, and a user- or brief-pinned direction beats the roll, always. Present the decision visually: write an options payload with the assigned direction leading, its raised lines included; the pick card when one exists; the dealt challengers as alternates with their QUALITY BAR cards, verdicts, and kept lines; re-roll with its safer and bolder registers; steer; canon enabled; and `buildPath` carrying the recorded default with `toggle: true` whenever image generation exists (details in the build-path paragraph below). A degraded roll with no challengers still uses the page, as a single text-only card with re-roll. Give every card the same anatomy: thesis, palette, materials, first viewport, honest risk, and the challengers' case lines (`--schema` prints the exact shape); the page renders identity from these fields, demotes declined challengers to their row on its own, and a challenger's catalog image rides as labeled inspiration, never the promise of the build. Author `canonCard` too: the category standard as one honest card, same anatomy; the page keeps it subordinate, and the counterweights still bind you. Run `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/serve-question.mjs --start --payload <file>` (`--schema` first for the payload shape). It daemonizes, prints the page URL and a key, and exits; open that URL for the user, in-app browser first, then the system opener, then showing the URL. Collect the choice with `--wait --key <key>`, repeating while it exits 3; the ANSWER prints as JSON. Exit 4 means the page closed unanswered: re-present once through the structured question tool, and with no answer there either, proceed unattended with the assigned direction and state the assumptions. A harness that can leave a shell blocked in the background may run the script without `--start` and let it auto-open and block. Never predict the fallback: run the script, and only exit code 2 from starting it routes the decision to the structured tool; that exit is the fallback, never an error to retry.
 
-When image generation exists, every card also declares a `sketch` path under `.impeccable/sketches/`, the canon card included. Serve the page first, then produce the sketches; the page shimmer-waits per slot and the user may answer before they land, so generation never delays the question. Render every sketch through one shared frame so the comparison stays about direction, never rendering luck: the requested surface's first viewport as a flat, matte design sketch in that card's own palette and type character, deliberately unfinished, no photorealism, no gloss, identical framing across cards; a candidate whose sketch looks more finished than the others has broken the comparison, not won it. The only legible text in a sketch is the product's real name and one real headline; every other text region is greeked, indistinct lines standing where copy will go, because a sketch that renders invented specs, prices, or dates puts claims in front of the user that PRODUCT.md never made. Produce in the order the user reads: the assigned card, then the hand, then canon, each file written the moment it is done. When the harness runs subagents in parallel, fan the set out as one agent per card: each spawn is the shipped asset producer with a single-sketch packet, that card's fields, PRODUCT.md, the shared frame, and the card's declared path, up to four in flight at once, so the whole set lands in roughly the time of one. A slot still empty when its agent returns is regenerated inline, and a slot still empty when the user answers is dropped without ceremony; no other supervision is owed. Without parallel subagents, generate in the main thread after serving, in the same reading order, and let the harness's own generation display carry the progress; the wait for the answer follows the last file. A sketch answers which world, never which composition: the comp round still renders its full set, and the chosen card's sketch seeds at most one probe. With no image generation, the cards carry their identity in palette chips and facts, and that page is complete, not a lesser version.
+When image generation exists, every card also declares a `comp` path under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/`, the canon card included. Where the harness sandboxes its shell, start the page through the least-sandboxed command path it offers: a sandboxed shell cannot bind the board's port, and the first-attempt failure costs a retry every session. Serve the page first, then produce the comps; the page shimmer-waits per slot and the user may answer before they land. Each card's image is that direction's north-star comp at full fidelity under [visualize.md](visualize.md)'s comp discipline: the requested surface's first viewport, structure-led prompt, real product name and real content, no invented commercial claims, in that card's own palette, type character, and material world, committed all the way. Generation takes the same time at any fidelity, so an unfinished draft pays comp cost for draft quality; fairness between cards is equal fidelity in each card's own grammar, one surface, one aspect, never shared unfinishedness. The frame's aspect is the surface's own: portrait at device viewport for a native app or mobile-first surface, landscape for desktop web; the decision page adapts to either, and a phone screen comped landscape is a broken frame, not a neutral default. Produce in reading order, the assigned card, then the pick, then the full-card hand, then canon, each file written with its prompt sidecar the moment it is done, so a re-roll's spend front-loads onto the cards read first; declined challengers get no comp, their catalog thumb is their face. With parallel subagents, fan out one agent per card: each spawn is the shipped asset producer with a single-comp packet, that card's fields, PRODUCT.md, the shared frame, and the card's declared path, up to four in flight. Regenerate inline any slot still empty when its agent returns; drop without ceremony any slot still empty when the user answers. No other supervision is owed. Without parallel subagents, generate in the main thread after serving, same order, and let the harness's own generation display carry the progress; the wait for the answer follows the last file. The chosen card's comp is not spent by the choice: comp-led, it enters the comp round as compositional option one; code-led, it returns at the finish review as the critique reference, what the image dared that the build did not. Unchosen comps stay in `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` as the round's spent hand; they carry no approval and imply none. With no image generation, cards carry their identity in palette chips and facts, and that page is complete, not a lesser version; the page then also demotes every challenger's catalog art to a labeled thumbnail on its own, because salience must encode the verdict, never the accident of which cards have images.
 
-Catalog worlds are working systems, not mood references. When one survives, carry its palette and material, type and composition, topology, controls and state, and responsive rules into the product. When the source is itself an interface language, commit to its native grammar across navigation, content, controls, and states. Open the QUALITY BAR board and hero for the world you build the moment the choice lands, even if you viewed another card earlier; the ANSWER line names the chosen card's images for exactly this reason (when the harness only reads files or runs sandboxed, download them into the workspace and open the relative path; sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths outside it). They set the craft level the build must reach, a rendered reference's finish, commitment, and art direction, never the composition; your surface serves this product.
+The execution contract, comp-led or code-led, is a workflow preference, not a per-surface decision; no round asks it. The recorded default rides every round and the page's toggle handles the exception. Read the default from `.impeccable/config.json` (`buildPath`), the gitignored `.impeccable/config.local.json` winning where one machine differs from the team's committed value; with neither, comp-led is the default whenever image generation exists. Author every direction and surface payload with `buildPath: { "value": <default>, "toggle": true }`; the page renders a footer toggle with the trade stated beside it, and the ANSWER returns `buildPath` plus `buildPathFlipped`. A flipped value binds that session only and is never written back, with one exception, the only question this preference ever earns inside a round (init records it up front on projects that get the chance): when `buildPathFlipped` comes back true on a project that records no `buildPath` at all, ask once after the round closes whether to keep it as the standing default. Either answer writes `.impeccable/config.json`; the answer picks the value, never whether to record one. Yes writes the flipped value; "no, just this once" writes the value they flipped away from, the standing default they just confirmed by declining. Ask on the flip, never on the untouched default: a user who left the toggle alone told you nothing. A declined offer nothing writes down is an offer the next session makes again. When the user asks in words to change the standing default, update the file without asking. **Comp-led**: the chosen card's comp is law, generated before building when it does not yet exist, and the finish review audits the build against it; boldest composition on the table, fix rounds expected, and the comp is non-optional, no silent skipping. **Code-led**: no comp of this page and no apology for it; the QUALITY BAR boards still calibrate finish, and the ambition moves into the written contract, the FIRST VIEWPORT block plus a named signature interaction and motion grammar, which the finish reviewer audits in behavior; code-led is not a discount on commitment. A code-led round still declares each card's comp path as a flip reserve: when the user flips the toggle to comp mid-round, `--wait` returns once with BUILD PATH FLIPPED while the page shimmers the slots; generate each open card's comp into its declared path then, lead first, and wait again. The flip back is free, and a comp that already rendered rides at the finish review as the critique reference. Without image generation there is no toggle and no choice: code-led is the only path, stated in one line rather than asked. The old two-card execution-contract round is retired; `followup: true` remains the general mechanism for delivering any later round over the same table via `--update`.
+
+Catalog worlds are working systems, not mood references. When one survives, carry its palette and material, type and composition, topology, controls and state, and responsive rules into the product. When the source is itself an interface language, commit to its native grammar across navigation, content, controls, and states. Open the QUALITY BAR board and hero for the world you build the moment the choice lands, even if you viewed another card earlier; the ANSWER line names the chosen card's images (when the harness only reads files or runs sandboxed, download them into the workspace and open the relative path; sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths outside it). They set the craft level the build must reach, a rendered reference's finish, commitment, and art direction, never the composition; your surface serves this product.
 
 Every direction the roll can land on must already be viable: every relationship and claim it visualizes true, a real palette and component family, a distinctive composition with one product-specific experience, workable at full-surface scale within the available assets, tools, and performance budget. A candidate that fails on truth is replaced before the roll, never rescued by it. Truth binds claims, not demonstrations: in greenfield work, author whatever illustrative material the concept needs at full fidelity, label it synthetic wherever a visitor could mistake it for the real thing, and hand the user the list of what to replace with real material. What stays uninventable are commercial and factual claims: prices, customers, benchmarks, endpoints, capabilities the product does not have. Refusing a bold direction because its demonstration data does not exist yet is the timidity reflex wearing honesty's clothes.
 
@@ -62,13 +64,13 @@ Pick a color strategy before picking colors: Restrained (neutrals plus one accen
 
 Choose faces like objects from the subject's world, in the mode's register. Operate and Read surfaces are well served by system stacks and workhorse UI faces; Persuade and Experience surfaces want faces with a point of view, and these training-data defaults mean you stopped looking: Fraunces, Playfair Display, Cormorant, Lora, Crimson, Newsreader, Syne, Space Grotesk, Space Mono, IBM Plex, Inter-as-display, DM Sans, DM Serif, Outfit, Plus Jakarta Sans, Instrument Sans. Naming one of these faces anyway requires a reason no other face could satisfy, and a subject association is never that reason: books wanting a serif, bookshops wanting hand-lettering, and tech wanting a mono are the associations the list exists to break.
 
-Calibration: AI-generated interfaces cluster around a few looks regardless of subject: warm cream ground, high-contrast serif display, and a terracotta or signal-red accent; near-black with one neon accent and glowing edges; broadsheet-editorial hairlines, italic display serif, and small tracked mono labels. All are legitimate when the brief calls for them; the brief always wins. Where the brief leaves the aesthetic free, landing in one of them means the self-check failed: if someone could guess your aesthetic from the category alone, or from category-plus-avoidance, rework until neither answer is obvious. Energy is not the enemy of trust: a brief's negative constraints (no gamification, no hype) rule out those devices, not exuberance, and adjectives describing the product's behavior (quiet support, calm coaching) do not dictate the surface's energy. A bookish, warm, or child-facing subject does not soften the calibration: book cloth, thread, jackets, endpapers, and shelf ephemera span the whole saturated spectrum, and cream paper is the smallest corner of that world; landing on cream plus serif for a book subject is the default wearing the subject's clothes. A brief-pinned world pins the world, not its softest rendition: the pinned world's full material range stays in play, and a rendition that matches what any model ships for that world failed the self-check at execution rather than selection.
+Calibration: AI-generated interfaces cluster around a few looks regardless of subject: warm cream ground, high-contrast serif display, and a terracotta or signal-red accent; near-black with one neon accent and glowing edges; broadsheet-editorial hairlines, italic display serif, and small tracked mono labels. All are legitimate when the brief calls for them. Where the brief leaves the aesthetic free, landing in one means the self-check failed: if someone could guess your aesthetic from the category alone, or from category-plus-avoidance, rework until neither answer is obvious. Energy is not the enemy of trust: a brief's negative constraints (no gamification, no hype) rule out those devices, not exuberance, and adjectives describing the product's behavior (quiet support, calm coaching) do not dictate the surface's energy. A bookish, warm, or child-facing subject does not soften the calibration: book cloth, thread, jackets, endpapers, and shelf ephemera span the whole saturated spectrum, and cream paper is the smallest corner of that world; landing on cream plus serif for a book subject is the default wearing the subject's clothes. A brief-pinned world pins the world, not its softest rendition: the pinned world's full material range stays in play, and a rendition matching what any model ships for that world failed the self-check at execution rather than selection.
 
 ## 5. Record the decision
 
 Before code, state the chosen direction as a contract in the artifact's opening comment, five short blocks, 150 words at most, in a form that survives the production build: an HTML comment in the emitted markup, never only a templating-frontmatter comment the compiler strips, and placed as the first child of the document's body in the root layout, never inside a slotted or child component, because some compilers (Astro among them) strip a slot's leading comment while keeping deeper ones. After the first production build, grep the built output for the seed key; a contract the build erased is a contract nobody can audit. THESIS: the one idea this surface owns and the category-default arrangement it refuses. OWN-WORLD: the palette and component language, specific enough to be recognizable with all content removed. STORY: what the visitor understands, believes, and does. FIRST VIEWPORT: the exact composition, what is where and at what scale, and where the primary action sits. FORM: the chosen form, its position on your ordered list, the staging chosen for it, and the seed key the script printed; when the seed dealt stagings, choosing the world does not silently discharge the staging decision, so name the one you commit to. Close the comment with one more line, FINISH: the run's exit condition, verbatim "unreviewed and undocumented is unfinished; this build ends with the finish review, the verdict, and DESIGN.md". The comment sits at the top of the artifact you re-open on every edit, which makes it the one reminder that survives a long build: a page that looks complete with the FINISH line undischarged is not done, it is abandoned at the finish line. If a block reads like a mood, the direction is not decided yet; the finishing review audits the render against this contract.
 
-On a new or replacement world, DESIGN.md is written at finish, from the built world, by the shipped documenter (section 7); a rulebook written before the build gets defended against reality instead of describing it, and it hands the design-system detector an unstable target that buries the build in noise. A new world shipped with no DESIGN.md is still an incomplete run. An ordinary extension does not rewrite DESIGN.md.
+On a new or replacement world, DESIGN.md is written at finish, from the built world, by the shipped documenter (section 7); a rulebook written before the build gets defended against reality instead of describing it, and hands the design-system detector an unstable target. A new world shipped with no DESIGN.md is still an incomplete run. An ordinary extension does not rewrite DESIGN.md.
 
 If the work establishes durable strategy for a route or artifact, read its existing surface brief, then update it:
 
@@ -78,17 +80,20 @@ If the work establishes durable strategy for a route or artifact, read its exist
 
 Keep the brief small: scope and visitor mode; audience, job, action/task, proof/content, and constraints; chosen direction and memorable moment; unresolved decisions. Do not copy global product truth or DESIGN.md tokens into it.
 
-Whenever any image generation is available, a harness-native tool or the API fallback context.mjs reports, the locked direction is visualized before it is built, never skipped: load [visualize.md](visualize.md) and follow it, three compositional options rendered and put before the user for approval. This step is proven to produce the most compositional and ambitious work.
+On a comp-led build, whenever any image generation is available (a harness-native tool or the API fallback context.mjs reports), the locked direction is visualized before it is built, never skipped: load [visualize.md](visualize.md) and follow it, three compositional options put before the user for approval, the chosen card's decision comp plus two variations. This step is proven to produce the most compositional and ambitious work. On a code-led build the comp round is skipped by contract, never by drift: the ambition it would have carried lives in the direction contract's FIRST VIEWPORT block and named signature interaction, and the finish reviewer audits those promises in behavior.
 
 For `shape`, return the selected direction to [shape.md](shape.md) and stop before persistence or implementation.
 
 ## 6. Build with full commitment
 
+When an approved comp exists, the comp is king, and the build happens in phases. The comp is a spatial contract, not a mood board: only the user can downgrade its authority, in explicit words, and difficulty never infers a downgrade. Phase one is reproduction: rebuild the comp at its own breakpoint until a screenshot at the comp's width and height overlaps it near pixel-perfectly, materials, components, elevation, assets, and implied design language included. Exactly three concessions exist: fonts (the closest obtainable face), icons (exact match unless the user already chose an icon library), and genuine defects in the generated comp such as spelling errors. Everything else must match, and models systematically believe their HTML, CSS, and SVG recreation succeeded when it did not, so the overlap comparison is the authority, never your conviction: set the screenshot beside the freshly reopened comp image at identical dimensions after every region, never beside your memory of it, and when a region keeps losing that comparison, stop recreating it in code and produce it as a rendered asset composited into the page. The comp also outranks every written record of it: when the recorded brief or inventory commits to less than the comp shows, a softer texture, a sparser field, a sculpted plate reduced to flat CSS, correct the record upward to the comp; qualifiers like subtle, restrained, and low-contrast, and counts rounded down to a comfortable fraction, are how approved materials die between approval and build. A produced material must then survive to the screen: a texture buried under a nearly opaque color wash ships the wash, not the material, so judge every material by the screenshot beside the comp, never by the stylesheet. Only when reproduction holds does phase two begin: static regions that should live become animated or interactive, reveals and motion are added, then responsiveness across the surface's devices. Where the comp does not cover the whole surface, continue building the remainder inside the comp's recorded world and design language; a component the comp never shows inherits the recorded system's corner language, line weights, and materials, and may not introduce container styles, border weights, or chrome the comp never uses.
+
 Build the assigned direction, not a safer interpretation of it. The form supplies structure, reading order, component conventions, and native motion; the product supplies every fact. Commit every atom: nav, buttons, inputs, and links are rebuilt in the form's vocabulary, and a stock component inside a committed form is a lapse. Land the first build fully committed; committing is the hard part, and the passes that follow exist to make the committed thing clear and effective, never to dilute it. In unattended work, the safe rendition is the known risk.
 
 - **The first viewport is a thesis, not a header.** Demonstrate the mechanism immediately, at the scale the form has in life; do not trap the concept inside a standard hero or card shell. The memory test: if someone left after one viewport, what would they describe an hour later? If the honest answer is a mood, the concept has not committed yet.
-- **Prove, don't claim.** Show the subject doing its job: the interface at work, the mechanism dramatized, specifics a competitor could not copy-paste. Sections that restate a claim in different words add length, not substance. Demonstration data is design material: author it at full fidelity and label it synthetic; never invent prices, customers, benchmarks, or capabilities.
-- **Author the assets; never substitute chrome.** Great surfaces live on carefully made content: names, entries, copy, covers, thumbnails, textures. In greenfield work every blank the ask round left open is yours to author at production fidelity; content is authorable, claims are labelable, no section is omittable. An unanswered commercial claim ships as a clearly marked placeholder on the user's replacement list. When image generation exists, producing the design's imagery is part of building, at the scale the composition needs: a viewport that wants atmosphere gets a full-bleed layered scene, and a library of small centered subjects standardized for tidiness forecloses that before a line of code exists. Gradients, glass, and generic icon tiles where an authored asset belongs are the gap wearing chrome; icons drawn in the world's own grammar are the remedy, not the target.
+- **Prove the hero before building past it.** When an approved comp exists, render the first viewport, capture it at the comp's own pixel dimensions, and set it beside the comp's first viewport before any later section: the hero carries the run's ambition, and every following section inherits its shortfall. Save that capture as `.impeccable/review/hero-repro.png` (create the directory); the finish reviewer verifies it exists, so a skipped checkpoint is a visible checkpoint. Judge scale and density as quantities, a field at a tenth of the comp's coverage or type at half its weight is a different design, and a five-minute retry here is what a rebuild verdict at the finish costs when this check is skipped.
+- **Prove, don't claim.** Show the subject doing its job: the interface at work, the mechanism dramatized, specifics a competitor could not copy-paste. Sections that restate a claim in different words add length, not substance. Demonstration data is design material: author it at full fidelity and label it synthetic; claims stay uninventable.
+- **Author the assets; never substitute chrome.** Great surfaces live on carefully made content: names, entries, copy, covers, thumbnails, textures. In greenfield work every blank the ask round left open is yours to author at production fidelity; content is authorable, claims are labelable, no section is omittable. An unanswered commercial claim ships as a clearly marked placeholder on the user's replacement list. When image generation exists, producing the design's imagery is part of building, at the scale the composition needs: a viewport that wants atmosphere gets a full-bleed layered scene, and a library of small centered subjects standardized for tidiness forecloses it. Gradients, glass, and generic icon tiles where an authored asset belongs are the gap wearing chrome; icons drawn in the world's own grammar are the remedy, not the target.
 - **Build the form's web leverage.** When the chosen world names a technique (canvas, WebGL, view transitions, generative motion), build the technique itself, not a static imitation of it; the graceful fallback serves constrained clients, it is not the default experience.
 - **Pace the scroll like a studio.** Vary density, scale, image, motion, and quiet inside one grammar; a dense passage earns a quiet one, and the page ends anchored by a real close. One spacing rhythm throughout, with more space above a heading than below it.
 - **Use real, verified imagery when the brief implies it.** Search for the subject's physical object rather than the category; one decisive photo beats five mediocre ones. Verify stock URLs resolve.
@@ -98,8 +103,16 @@ Preserve semantics, accessibility, performance, responsiveness, project conventi
 
 ## 7. Inspect and finish
 
-Inspect desktop and mobile in one batched screenshot round, critique the render against the user's request and the direction contract, fix material gaps, and confirm with one final round; two rounds is the ceiling, and fixes batch between them rather than earning per-tweak screenshots. On a Persuade surface, verify the mode did its job: a first-time visitor should know what this is, why it matters, and what to do within seconds, in the form's own vocabulary.
+Inspect the surface's target sizes in one batched screenshot round: desktop and mobile on the web; on a native platform (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`), the shipped device classes per OS, captured from the simulator or emulator the way the platform reference's Verifying the build section describes. When the harness reports the user's actual viewport (an in-app browser's size, a named resolution), add that width to the set: the width that breaks is the one the user sees first. Critique the render against the user's request and the direction contract, fix material gaps, and confirm with one final round; two rounds is the ceiling, and fixes batch between them rather than earning per-tweak screenshots. When an approved comp exists, the critique is a side-by-side: view the comp region and the build region together, the hero and each section as its own crop at legible scale, never one full-page thumbnail, which hides exactly the failures that matter, crude controls, wrong lettering character, flattened material, behind a superficially similar section order. On a Persuade surface, verify the mode did its job: a first-time visitor should know what this is, why it matters, and what to do within seconds, in the form's own vocabulary.
+
+A capture is evidence only when it is valid, and you validate before you send. Settle or disable entrance motion first: an element hidden by animation timing reads as a missing element and gets fixed into a regression. Capture full-page shots from the document top. Capture the comp comparison at the comp's own pixel dimensions. Then open every file once and confirm it shows what its name claims: no black or blank regions, no wrong section behind a right filename, no half-loaded state. A malformed capture sent onward costs the whole round; the reviewer answers it with `disposition: recapture` and nothing it reviewed binds.
+
+After the second inspection round the build thread's polishing is over: no further defect hunts, micro-edit scripts, or rebuilds here; whatever remains ships through the handoffs, where a fresh context does the finding better and cheaper. On the web, where this harness runs no design hook, run `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/detect.mjs --json` on the changed targets once here, fix what is mechanical, and pass the remaining findings to the reviewer; a hookless web build that skips this ships every tell the hook exists to catch. A native platform skips the detector entirely: it reads HTML and CSS and has no verdict on native code, so the reviewer's floor check is the only slop gate and the input packet says so. Capture the screenshots into `.impeccable/review/`, one file per captured viewport (on the web, `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`, plus `user-<width>.png` whenever the user's viewport joined the inspected set; on native, one per device class, such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive), creating that directory when the harness does not; the paths you pass the reviewer are its spec, every viewport you inspected is named required in the packet, and that directory is where it looks when a passed path is missing.
+
+Then spawn the shipped finish reviewer, `impeccable-finish-reviewer` (`impeccable_finish_reviewer` in codex; `/impeccable-finish-reviewer` in Cursor; on GitHub Copilot say "Use the impeccable-finish-reviewer agent"), with the original request, confirmed answers, the artifact path, the screenshot paths, the direction contract, existing hook findings, the QUALITY BAR card and approved comp paths (a code-led build has no approved comp; the chosen decision comp rides in that slot as the critique reference, named as such), the craft-floor reference path, and on a native platform the platform reference path(s), [ios.md](ios.md) / [android.md](android.md), both on adaptive, plus one line saying no detector ran, so the reviewer judges in the platform's conventions rather than the web's. The reviewer has no browser; screenshots you fail to pass are checks it cannot run. Never read the shipped agents' definition files before spawning; the harness loads them at spawn, and you owe only the input packet. Wait on any agent with one long timeout rather than a loop of short polls, and spend the wait on the next independent step. Verify the return carries the five contract sections (a recapture return carries one, its recapture list); on an empty or thrashed return, respawn once with the same inputs. This review never runs inside the build thread and never inherits it: spawn the reviewer fresh, with no forked conversation history (`fork_turns: 0` in codex); a reviewer that inherits your transcript inherits your framing, your optimism, and your abstractions, and everything it needs travels in the inputs above. Only a harness with no subagent capability at all substitutes a fresh in-thread pass after stepping fully out of the build context, run from [degraded/finish-reviewer.md](degraded/finish-reviewer.md), and a substituted or failed-and-replaced review is disclosed in one line at finish, never silently.
+
+Act on the disposition word; there are exactly four. **recapture**: the evidence failed, not the build. Recapture what the return names under the capture-validity rules, then run a full review over the new evidence. A review conducted on invalid evidence binds nothing, and a verdict pass may never follow it. **rebuild**: fidelity failed wholesale, not in patches. Skip the fix batch and execute the rebuild immediately: re-derive the named regions, produce the named assets, and send the result back for a fresh full review, never a verdict pass; a rebuild replaces regions wholesale, so the whole matrix runs again over the recaptures. Tell the user what is happening rather than asking permission to fix a failure. Consult the user only on a second rebuild directive, both verdicts on the table, or when rebuilding would discard content the user approved. **ship**: nothing is owed; report the verdict at its scope and continue to the documenter. **fix**: apply the material fixes in one batch, rebuild once, and recapture the same viewports over the same files. A recapture measures positions, loading, and overflow; it cannot measure whether a fix reached the quality the finding named, so send the recaptured screenshots back to the same reviewer for a verdict scoring every material fix resolved, partial, or unresolved (through the harness's agent continuation; without one, run the scoring fresh from [degraded/finish-reviewer.md](degraded/finish-reviewer.md)'s Verdict Pass). Fixes scored partial or unresolved get another batch, recapture, and verdict. Two rounds is the budget an unattended run ends at; an attended session's ceiling belongs to the user, so when the second verdict still lists open items, put the table in front of them and let them choose between shipping as it stands and funding another round. Whoever decides, stop the moment a round resolves nothing, and the reviewer's findings are the only list you work from, never your own re-opened hunt. Do not run a second detector.
 
-After the second inspection round the build thread's polishing is over: no further defect hunts, micro-edit scripts, or rebuilds here; whatever remains ships through the handoffs, where a fresh context does the finding better and cheaper. Capture desktop and mobile screenshots to files, then spawn the shipped finish reviewer, `impeccable-finish-reviewer` (`impeccable_finish_reviewer` in codex), with the original request, confirmed answers, the artifact path, the screenshot paths, its direction contract, existing hook findings, and the QUALITY BAR card and approved comp paths. The reviewer has no browser; screenshots you fail to pass are checks it cannot run. Verify its return carries the five contract sections; on an empty or thrashed return, respawn once with the same inputs before doing anything else. This review never runs inside the build thread. Only a harness whose tool surface has no subagent capability at all substitutes a fresh in-thread pass after stepping fully out of the build context, run from [degraded/finish-reviewer.md](degraded/finish-reviewer.md), and a substituted or failed-and-replaced review is disclosed in one line at finish, never silently. Apply the material fixes in one batch, rebuild once, and recapture the same viewports. A recapture measures positions, loading, and overflow; it cannot measure whether a fix reached the quality the finding named, so send the recaptured screenshots back to the same reviewer for a verdict scoring every material fix resolved, partial, or unresolved (through the harness's agent continuation; without one, run the scoring fresh from [degraded/finish-reviewer.md](degraded/finish-reviewer.md)'s Verdict Pass). Fixes scored partial or unresolved get exactly one more batch, recapture, and verdict; two correction rounds is the ceiling, the second verdict ends the work whatever it says, and the reviewer's findings are the only list you work from, never your own re-opened hunt. Report the final verdict table to the user as it stands, open items included: presenting mechanical confirmation as artistic success is how a failed build gets announced as a finished one. Do not run a second detector.
+Report the final verdict under the reviewer's own disposition word and at its actual scope. A verdict pass scores the listed fixes and nothing else: "the reviewer scored all three fixes resolved" is a claim it supports, "no material issues remain" is not. A table with open material findings is never announced as a pass, never softened, and never dressed as whole-surface approval when only a fix list was scored. When the user answers a ship with evidence against it, their own screenshot, a named mismatch with the comp, that evidence outranks every capture you made: put their material in the packet and spawn a fresh reviewer for a new full review. Patching inline and self-certifying is how a rejected page ships twice.
 
-Then spawn the shipped documenter, `impeccable-documenter` (`impeccable_documenter` in codex), with the project root, the artifact path, the direction contract, PRODUCT.md, the [document.md](document.md) reference path, and the boundary to write at; it records DESIGN.md and the sidecar from the built world, ground truth over intention; without subagents the pass runs from [degraded/documenter.md](degraded/documenter.md). A clean detector pass is not finished; finished is the contract kept, the comp honored, the review closed, and the system recorded.
+Then spawn the shipped documenter, `impeccable-documenter` (`impeccable_documenter` in codex), with the project root, the artifact path, the direction contract, PRODUCT.md, the [document.md](document.md) reference path, and the boundary to write at; it records DESIGN.md and the sidecar from the built world, ground truth over intention; without subagents the pass runs from [degraded/documenter.md](degraded/documenter.md). The documenter runs after the last correction lands: when any fix round follows the documentation, re-run the documenter over the changed surface, because a DESIGN.md describing a layout that no longer exists turns defects into system guidance. A clean detector pass is not finished; finished is the contract kept, the comp honored, the review closed, and the system recorded.

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/overdrive.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Push an interface past conventional limits. This isn't just about visual effects
 This command has the highest potential to misfire. Do NOT jump straight into implementation. You MUST:
 
 1. **Think through 2-3 different directions**: consider different techniques, levels of ambition, and aesthetic approaches. For each direction, briefly describe what the result would look and feel like.
-2. **STOP and use Codex's structured user-input/question tool when available; if unavailable, ask directly in chat to clarify what you cannot infer.** to present these directions and get the user's pick before writing any code. Explain trade-offs (browser support, performance cost, complexity).
+2. **Get the user's pick before writing any code.** STOP and use Codex's structured user-input/question tool when available; if unavailable, ask directly in chat to clarify what you cannot infer. Carry each direction's description and its trade-offs (browser support, performance cost, complexity) inside the option itself, so the user is choosing between things they can read. A structured question blocks the message it rides in until the user answers, so directions written alongside the question stay invisible while the user is being asked to choose between them.
 3. Only proceed with the direction the user confirms.
 
 Skipping this step risks building something embarrassing that needs to be thrown away.

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/polish.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Fix the cause at the narrowest correct level. Ask when a binding system principl
 
 ## 2. Gather the evidence
 
-Use the feature yourself at representative desktop and mobile sizes. Determine:
+Use the feature yourself at the surface's representative sizes: desktop and mobile on the web; on a native platform (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`), the shipped device classes on the simulator, emulator, or hardware, captured per the platform reference's Verifying the build section. Determine:
 
 - whether the path is functionally complete;
 - the intended quality bar and time available;
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ Do not perfect one corner while leaving the rest below the same quality bar.
 
 Walk the complete path again with mouse, keyboard, and touch where applicable. Check:
 
-- mobile, intermediate, and wide layouts;
+- mobile, intermediate, and wide layouts on the web; phone and tablet size classes in both supported orientations on native;
 - loading, empty, error, success, disabled, long-content, and missing-content states;
 - zoom, contrast, focus, semantics, and screen-reader names;
-- console errors, layout shift, interaction latency, image loading, and supported browsers;
+- console errors, layout shift, interaction latency, and image loading everywhere; supported browsers on the web; supported OS versions, runtime warnings, and dropped frames on native;
 - agreement with DESIGN.md, neighboring features, and the user's scope.
 
 Follow the quality guidance supplied by `context.mjs` and hooks, then run any other relevant QA commands. Context requests a manual scan only when no automatic detector is active; never add another detector pass. Fix real defects and document only narrow intentional exceptions. A clean scan does not replace visual judgment.

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/quieter.md

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Analyze what makes the design feel too intense:
    - What's working? (Don't throw away good ideas)
    - What's the core message? (Preserve what matters)
 
-If any of these are unclear from the codebase, STOP and use Codex's structured user-input/question tool when available; if unavailable, ask directly in chat to clarify what you cannot infer.
+If any of these are unclear from the codebase, do not guess. STOP and use Codex's structured user-input/question tool when available; if unavailable, ask directly in chat to clarify what you cannot infer.
 
 **CRITICAL**: "Quieter" doesn't mean boring or generic. It means refined and easier on the eyes. Think luxury, not laziness.
 

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/visualize.md

@@ -1,38 +1,52 @@
 # Visualize: Direction Comps & Asset Production
 
-Load this from [new-work.md](new-work.md) whenever any image generation is available, a harness-native tool or the API fallback context.mjs reports. PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md are preconditions. New-work has already resolved the visual world; this file must not reopen it.
+Load this from [new-work.md](new-work.md) on a comp-led build, when image generation is available (a harness-native tool or the API fallback context.mjs reports). A code-led contract skips this file by design, not by drift; do not load it then. PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md are preconditions. New-work has already resolved the visual world; this file must not reopen it. A surface-scope structure round that already put three visualized cards before the user (new-work.md, established world) has discharged this round: the locked card's comp is the approved comp, so record the approval and continue at After approval; generate nothing new.
 
-The purpose of a probe is to test composition, narrative, hierarchy, density, focal moment, signature use, and image requirements. It is not a second identity workshop. Keep DESIGN.md's palette, typography direction, material language, component character, imagery stance, and motion grammar fixed.
+A probe tests composition, narrative, hierarchy, density, focal moment, signature use, and image requirements. It is not a second identity workshop. Keep DESIGN.md's palette, typography direction, material language, component character, imagery stance, and motion grammar fixed.
 
 ## Generate three compositional options
 
-Render three distinct high-fidelity north-star comps of the requested surface, with whatever generation capability exists, saved under `.impeccable/mocks/` so they survive the session; record the approved comp's path in the surface brief. Open every image you produce or reference by its workspace-relative path, never an absolute one: sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths, and everything under the project root has a relative path. Base them on the real content and the surface concepts already developed with the user. Three is the number: one comp invites rubber-stamping, and the spread between three is what surfaces the composition worth building. A decision-page sketch is not a probe: it chose the direction at deliberately unfinished fidelity, so the three comps render regardless, and the chosen card's sketch seeds at most one of them.
+Render three distinct high-fidelity north-star comps of the requested surface, saved under `.impeccable/mocks/` so they survive the session. Comp at the surface's own viewport: portrait at device size for a native app or mobile-first surface, desktop landscape otherwise; a phone screen comped landscape misstates the composition before anything is built against it. Comps are the build thread's own work, never delegated: the thread that writes the prompts holds the direction's full context and has seen every comp when the build starts. Open every image you produce or reference by its workspace-relative path, never an absolute one: sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths, and everything under the project root has a relative path. Base the comps on real content and the surface concepts already developed with the user. On an established world, anchor every comp on the real identity: capture a screenshot of a representative existing page and pass it as a reference image (the harness image tool's input image, or `generate-image.mjs --ref`); the prompt leads with the new surface's structure while the reference carries palette, type, and component character, because DESIGN.md words alone drift where a pixel reference does not. Name what the reference contributes and what it must not: chrome, palette, type, and component character carry over; the reference page's own content does not, and a banner, hero, or card lifted verbatim is the reference leaking, not fidelity. Three is the number: one comp invites rubber-stamping; the spread between three surfaces the composition worth building. The chosen card's decision comp is the first of the three: it already renders this direction at full fidelity under this discipline, so generate two more that vary what the first held fixed, and send all three to the approval point together. Only a round arriving with no decision comp (a degraded roll, an identity-mode page, a direction pinned without the decision round) renders all three here.
 
+- A comp is a designed surface, not a picture of the subject. Lead the prompt with the surface's own structure: the regions this design has, named in order with their scale relationships; a page with no navigation says so instead of inventing one, and an unconventional surface states its unconventional skeleton. A prompt that leads with atmosphere gets a vignette back: the model paints the fish market instead of the fish market's website. Self-check every render: if it could hang as a poster, or reads as a photograph with some text on it, it is not a comp; regenerate with the layout scaffold stated more literally.
+- The inverse is also a failure: a surface with none of its subject in it. The subject appears as the content the regions hold; the world dresses the frame and never displaces what the frame shows. The deletion usually rides in on the prompt's exclusion list, so exclusions bind invented claims, and a medium ban belongs to the committed imagery stance, never to caution. Before accepting a render, point at the subject; a render that depicts everything about the world and nothing of the subject fails however faithful its atmosphere. Regenerate with the subject's content named region by region.
+- Judge a comp as the shipped screen: the visitor's job must be readable from the image alone. Name the surface's mode from the render with no caption; a render whose mode cannot be read back is art direction without a surface. Regenerate with the visitor's job as the prompt's spine.
+- Commitment is depth, not coverage. The world enters through one dominant move plus the material, type, and spacing that support it; the remaining regions hold still so that move can be read. A region that simply does its job in the world's grammar carries the direction further than a region performing the concept. The check cuts competition, never content: a quieted region keeps its information and stops performing. A second element competing with the named focal moment at the same scale means the comp is shouting; with no named focal moment, several regions performing the concept at once is the same shout. Regenerate keeping the strongest move and quieting the rest. Busy is louder, not bolder.
 - When the user shortlisted multiple concepts, spread the three across them.
 - When one direction is committed, vary the structural uncertainty an image can resolve: topology, sequence, density, hierarchy, focal composition, or interaction framing.
-- Show enough beyond the opening moment to prove the concept can govern the whole requested surface.
+- Show enough beyond the opening moment to prove the concept can govern the whole surface.
 - Do not generate a palette artifact, ask new atmosphere questions, introduce a different type voice, or invent a new motif. If the committed world cannot support the concept, return to the concept shortlist rather than changing the world.
 
-Treat each comp as a direction test, not a screenshot specification. Core UI text, responsive behavior, accessibility, semantics, and interaction states remain implementation responsibilities.
+Each comp is a direction test, not a screenshot specification. Core UI text, responsive behavior, accessibility, semantics, and interaction states remain implementation responsibilities.
 
 ## One approval point
 
-Show the three together: in the harness when it can display images, otherwise on the decision page (`serve-question.mjs`, one option per comp with the comp as its hero). Ask what should carry forward, what feels false to the world, and whether the selected surface concept should be approved, combined, revised, or rejected. Then stop and wait. A structured simulated user counts as attended and receives the same question.
+Show the three together on the decision page (`serve-question.mjs`, one option per comp with the comp as its hero), or in the harness only when it renders images inline; a text-only surface does not count as display. Ask what should carry forward, what feels false to the world, and whether the selected concept should be approved, combined, revised, or rejected. Then stop and wait. A structured simulated user counts as attended and receives the same question.
 
 Do not begin code until the user approves a direction or explicitly delegates the choice. If they delegate, choose using the task brief, PRODUCT.md, and DESIGN.md, and state the evidence. Approval refines the task concept; it does not modify DESIGN.md.
 
-After approval, summarize the composition and the parts of the comp that must not be literalized. Return to new-work.md, record the direction contract from the approved surface concept, then build.
+This approval point has no substitute and no skip condition. When the structured question tool errors, fall back to the decision page; only after both fail may you treat the choice as delegated, and a delegated pick is recorded exactly as an approval is and disclosed in your first reply, not your last. The finish reviewer treats comp-round comps with no recorded approval as a material finding; decision comps under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` are the direction round's hand, not comp-round output, and imply no approval on their own.
+
+After approval, record the choice where tools can find it: the approved comp's path goes in the surface brief, and its `.json` prompt sidecar gains `"approved": true` (every comp generated through `generate-image.mjs` has one; create it if a native tool didn't). The sidecar travels with the mocks folder, so the approval survives sessions and machines that never see the brief. Summarize the composition and the parts of the comp that must not be literalized, return to new-work.md, record the direction contract from the approved concept, and build.
 
 ## Inventory implementation fidelity
 
-Before building, inventory the approved comp's major visible ingredients in writing (a short table in the surface brief or working notes; the finish reviewer audits shipped assets against it) and choose an implementation medium for each: semantic HTML/CSS/SVG, existing project asset, generated raster, sourced raster, icon library, canvas/WebGL, or accepted omission. The same written inventory names the comp's compositional commitments: navigation items and icons, headline levels and their scale relationship, signature geometry such as seams, masks, and overlaps, and each section's arrangement and density. An element never written down is the element the build silently drops, and the direction contract's 150 words cannot carry this list, so this inventory is where it lives. Textures, portraits, and scenes are raster-by-default; a CSS gradient is not a texture medium. Every `produce` entry is produced before the build ships, through the asset producer or in the current thread; an inventory with unproduced entries is an unfinished build, and this gate is where imagery-free pages come from when it is skipped.
+Before building, read the approved comp as a design system and record it in the brief: component grammar, corner language, line weights, elevation treatment, and the type ramp. Everything the comp does not show gets built from this record; without it the fallback is the model's stock kit of square boxes, 1px grids, bento cells, and hard shadows. Then inventory the comp's major visible ingredients in writing (a short table in the surface brief or working notes; the finish reviewer audits shipped assets against it) and choose an implementation medium for each: semantic HTML/CSS/SVG, existing project asset, generated raster, sourced raster, icon library, canvas/WebGL, or accepted omission. The same inventory names the comp's compositional commitments: navigation items and icons, headline levels and their scale relationship, signature geometry such as seams, masks, and overlaps, and each section's arrangement and density. The primary action gets its own row with its own medium: when the comp dissolves, stamps, erodes, or otherwise physically works the main CTA, that treatment is signature material on the page's most important element, and shrinking it to a border trick is the compliance-token version of commitment. An element never written down is the element the build silently drops; the direction contract's 150 words cannot carry this list, so it lives here.
+
+The medium column is where an approved design most often dies, so it obeys a gate: the medium is decided by what the comp region shows, never by what feels buildable in the current stack. A human figure, a product object, machinery, or any material with lighting and depth is raster whatever the stack; so is any texture by name alone: woven cloth, paper grain, fabric, leather, brushed metal need no depth argument, because a CSS gradient is not a texture medium and "layered CSS textures" is not a medium at all. Writing "silhouette" for a photographic figure, or "CSS" for a sculpted panel's finish, is not a medium choice; it is the quiet deletion of the approved design, and it is how a comp full of physical material becomes a flat page with the same section order. Style does not move this boundary: a comp region with perspective, shading, figure drawing, or dense mechanical detail is illustration however line-drawn it looks, and no build session can author illustration as vectors, so it regenerates as raster like any photograph. Authored SVG covers what a session can specify exactly (diagrams with countable elements, controls, flat shape systems) and ends where drawing skill begins; an instruction-manual world keeps its illustrations as line-art illustrations, not diagrams. Produce such regions by regenerating them cleanly, with the approved comp and its embedded prompt as the reference for a fresh render at asset resolution; never crop pixels out of the comp itself, whose effective resolution sits far below asset grade. Dropping an image-native region is a scope decision the user makes at the approval point, never a silent flattening after it. Generated imagery is a material, not a claim: evidence rules bind assertions, specs, testimonials, and photographs presented as real, never render fidelity; "no photography on hand" forbids fake proof, not an illustrated hero.
+
+The gate runs both ways: precise geometry, hard-edged shape systems, diagrams, expressive motion, shaders, and anything interactive are vector and GPU territory (SVG, canvas, WebGL), where a raster flattens what should move, scale, and respond. A field or texture built from many small elements carries a quantity commitment either way: write down its approximate density and coverage ("thousands of glyphs over two-thirds of the fold, dense at the top fading into the path"), because a field rebuilt at a tenth of its density passes every checklist and still is not the design. TYPE rows carry the same discipline: name the face's compression class, and render one headline word against the comp before building on it; a visibly wider or lighter silhouette means the face is wrong, and every section built on it inherits the miss. Raster is for what the world paints; code is for what the world draws, animates, or reacts with, and choosing code there is ambition, not economy. Every `produce` entry is produced before the build ships, through the asset producer or in the current thread; an inventory with unproduced entries is an unfinished build, and this gate is where imagery-free pages come from when it is skipped.
 
-Pay special attention to the dominant composition, signature use, image-native content, second-fold system, and any interaction the still image only implies. If the concept depends on a photograph, architectural scene, product object, portrait, or other raster-native material, do not silently replace it with generic CSS scenery.
+Pay special attention to the dominant composition, signature use, image-native content, second-fold system, and any interaction the still image only implies.
 
-Treat the comp as a north star, not something to trace, and know what that allows: translation into semantic, responsive, accessible code, never recomposition. Keeping the palette and mood while redrawing the topology is a second art direction, not an adaptation. Do not rasterize core UI text or controls. Do not substitute a different visual driver after approval without asking.
+The comp is a north star, not something to trace, and know what that allows: translation into semantic, responsive, accessible code, never recomposition. Keeping the palette and mood while redrawing the topology is a second art direction, not an adaptation. Do not rasterize core UI text or controls. Do not substitute a different visual driver after approval without asking.
 
 ## Produce only the assets the build needs
 
-When clean raster ingredients are required and the harness runs subagents, use the shipped asset producer, `impeccable-asset-producer` (`impeccable_asset_producer` in codex): give it the approved comp, output paths, required dimensions and formats, transparency needs, crop notes, and what must remain semantic code. Otherwise produce the minimum required assets in the current thread by the book: load [degraded/asset-producer.md](degraded/asset-producer.md) and follow it inline, with whatever generation exists, the native tool or generate-image.mjs.
+Generation context is part of the asset: a build composed by a thread that never saw the prompts places assets it does not understand. Prefer generating build-critical imagery in the build thread when the budget allows; when a subagent produces assets instead, every asset carries its prompt, and the builder reads those prompts before composing. The carrier is uniform across harnesses: after generating any image with any tool, native or `generate-image.mjs` (which does it automatically), run `node .agents/skills/impeccable/scripts/embed-prompt.mjs <image> --prompt "<the prompt used>"` so the intent lives inside the file and survives copies between machines and harnesses; `--read` recovers it from any impeccable-generated image.
+
+When the harness runs subagents, spawn the shipped asset producer every time, even when the inventory's produce bucket looks empty: its manifest is the independent second opinion on your media, and the runs that skipped the spawn are the runs whose cotton became CSS. An honestly empty manifest costs one cheap spawn; a wrongly empty produce bucket costs the build its materials. Use `impeccable-asset-producer` (`impeccable_asset_producer` in codex; `/impeccable-asset-producer` in Cursor; on GitHub Copilot say "Use the impeccable-asset-producer agent"): give it the approved comp, output paths, required dimensions and formats, transparency needs, crop notes, and what must remain semantic code. Without subagents, produce the minimum required assets in the current thread by the book: load [degraded/asset-producer.md](degraded/asset-producer.md) and follow it inline, with whatever generation exists.
+
+Convert images with a converter context.mjs reported at boot (the IMAGE_TOOLS line); probe only when it reported none, at most once per session, never per image.
 
 Return to [new-work.md](new-work.md) for the direction contract, implementation, and the finishing pass.