@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.b655e406 → 0.0.1-commit.b9865e97
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +325 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +79 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +251 -0
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +52 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +44 -16
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +104 -34
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +22 -11
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +11 -5
- package/dest/index.d.ts +3 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +99 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +208 -0
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.js +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts +36 -6
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.js +9 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts +18 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js +18 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -11
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +9 -5
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +16 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +58 -30
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +134 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1072 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +87 -24
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +520 -90
- package/package.json +24 -14
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +417 -0
- package/src/config.ts +52 -11
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +170 -46
- package/src/factory.ts +37 -11
- package/src/index.ts +2 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +269 -0
- package/src/key_store/index.ts +1 -0
- package/src/key_store/interface.ts +44 -5
- package/src/key_store/local_key_store.ts +14 -5
- package/src/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.ts +28 -5
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +18 -5
- package/src/metrics.ts +81 -33
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1161 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +739 -134
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -52
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -286
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -343
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,51 +1,98 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
1
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
2
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
3
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
4
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
5
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
6
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
10
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
7
11
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
8
12
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
13
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
14
|
+
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
9
15
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
10
|
-
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
11
16
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
17
|
+
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
12
18
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
13
19
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
20
|
+
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
14
21
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
15
22
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
16
23
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
24
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS = 1000;
|
|
25
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
17
27
|
// What errors from the block proposal handler result in slashing
|
|
18
28
|
const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
19
29
|
'state_mismatch',
|
|
20
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
30
|
+
'failed_txs',
|
|
31
|
+
'global_variables_mismatch',
|
|
32
|
+
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
33
|
+
'parent_block_wrong_slot',
|
|
34
|
+
'in_hash_mismatch'
|
|
21
35
|
];
|
|
36
|
+
const SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = {
|
|
37
|
+
// enabled
|
|
38
|
+
['invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier']: true,
|
|
39
|
+
['checkpoint_header_mismatch']: true,
|
|
40
|
+
// These late mismatches should normally be caught by earlier checks, but if reached after validating the local
|
|
41
|
+
// checkpoint inputs, the proposer-signed payload disagrees with deterministic recomputation.
|
|
42
|
+
['archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
43
|
+
['out_hash_mismatch']: true,
|
|
44
|
+
['no_blocks_for_slot']: true,
|
|
45
|
+
['too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint']: true,
|
|
46
|
+
['checkpoint_validation_failed']: true,
|
|
47
|
+
['last_block_archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
48
|
+
// disabled
|
|
49
|
+
['invalid_signature']: false,
|
|
50
|
+
['last_block_not_found']: false,
|
|
51
|
+
['block_fetch_error']: false,
|
|
52
|
+
['checkpoint_already_published']: false
|
|
53
|
+
};
|
|
22
54
|
/**
|
|
23
55
|
* Validator Client
|
|
24
56
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
25
57
|
keyStore;
|
|
26
58
|
epochCache;
|
|
27
59
|
p2pClient;
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
60
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
61
|
+
blockSource;
|
|
62
|
+
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
63
|
+
worldState;
|
|
64
|
+
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
29
65
|
config;
|
|
66
|
+
blobClient;
|
|
67
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
30
68
|
dateProvider;
|
|
31
|
-
log;
|
|
32
69
|
tracer;
|
|
33
70
|
validationService;
|
|
34
71
|
metrics;
|
|
72
|
+
log;
|
|
35
73
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
36
74
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
75
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
76
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
39
77
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
40
78
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
79
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
41
80
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
81
|
+
slotsWithInvalidProposals;
|
|
82
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
83
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
84
|
+
slotsWithProposalEquivocation;
|
|
85
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
86
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
87
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.slotsWithInvalidProposals = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS), this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS);
|
|
88
|
+
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
89
|
+
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
44
90
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
45
91
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
46
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
92
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
93
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
47
94
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
48
|
-
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), log, 1000);
|
|
95
|
+
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
49
96
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
50
97
|
this.log.verbose(`Initialized validator with addresses: ${myAddresses.map((a)=>a.toString()).join(', ')}`);
|
|
51
98
|
}
|
|
@@ -77,6 +124,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
77
124
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
78
125
|
return;
|
|
79
126
|
}
|
|
127
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
80
128
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
81
129
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
82
130
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -92,27 +140,64 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
92
140
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
93
141
|
}
|
|
94
142
|
}
|
|
95
|
-
static new(config,
|
|
143
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
96
144
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
97
145
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
98
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
146
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
147
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
148
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
149
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
150
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
151
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
152
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
153
|
+
}
|
|
99
154
|
});
|
|
100
|
-
const
|
|
101
|
-
const
|
|
155
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
156
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
157
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
158
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
159
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
160
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
161
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
162
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
163
|
+
}));
|
|
164
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
165
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
166
|
+
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
167
|
+
const haConfig = {
|
|
168
|
+
...config,
|
|
169
|
+
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
170
|
+
};
|
|
171
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
172
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
173
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
174
|
+
}));
|
|
175
|
+
} else {
|
|
176
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
177
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
178
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
179
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
180
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
181
|
+
}));
|
|
182
|
+
}
|
|
183
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
184
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
102
185
|
return validator;
|
|
103
186
|
}
|
|
104
187
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
105
188
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
106
189
|
}
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
return this.
|
|
190
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
191
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
109
192
|
}
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
return this.blockProposalHandler.reexecuteTransactions(proposal, blockNumber, txs, l1ToL2Messages);
|
|
193
|
+
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
194
|
+
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
113
195
|
}
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
return
|
|
196
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
197
|
+
return {
|
|
198
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
199
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
200
|
+
};
|
|
116
201
|
}
|
|
117
202
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
118
203
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
@@ -123,69 +208,111 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
123
208
|
getConfig() {
|
|
124
209
|
return this.config;
|
|
125
210
|
}
|
|
211
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
212
|
+
return this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber);
|
|
213
|
+
}
|
|
214
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
215
|
+
return this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber);
|
|
216
|
+
}
|
|
126
217
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
127
218
|
this.config = {
|
|
128
219
|
...this.config,
|
|
129
220
|
...config
|
|
130
221
|
};
|
|
222
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
223
|
+
}
|
|
224
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
225
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
226
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
227
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
131
228
|
}
|
|
132
229
|
async start() {
|
|
133
230
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
134
231
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
135
232
|
return;
|
|
136
233
|
}
|
|
234
|
+
await this.keyStore.start();
|
|
137
235
|
await this.registerHandlers();
|
|
138
236
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
139
237
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee('now', myAddresses);
|
|
238
|
+
this.log.info(`Started validator with addresses: ${myAddresses.map((a)=>a.toString()).join(', ')}`);
|
|
140
239
|
if (inCommittee.length > 0) {
|
|
141
|
-
this.log.info(`
|
|
142
|
-
} else {
|
|
143
|
-
this.log.info(`Started validator with addresses: ${myAddresses.map((a)=>a.toString()).join(', ')}`);
|
|
240
|
+
this.log.info(`Addresses in current validator committee: ${inCommittee.map((a)=>a.toString()).join(', ')}`);
|
|
144
241
|
}
|
|
145
242
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.start();
|
|
146
243
|
return Promise.resolve();
|
|
147
244
|
}
|
|
148
245
|
async stop() {
|
|
149
246
|
await this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.stop();
|
|
247
|
+
await this.keyStore.stop();
|
|
150
248
|
}
|
|
151
249
|
/** Register handlers on the p2p client */ async registerHandlers() {
|
|
152
250
|
if (!this.hasRegisteredHandlers) {
|
|
153
251
|
this.hasRegisteredHandlers = true;
|
|
154
252
|
this.log.debug(`Registering validator handlers for p2p client`);
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
this.
|
|
253
|
+
// Block proposal handler - validates but does NOT attest (validators only attest to checkpoints)
|
|
254
|
+
const blockHandler = (block, proposalSender)=>this.validateBlockProposal(block, proposalSender);
|
|
255
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerBlockProposalHandler(blockHandler);
|
|
256
|
+
// Checkpoint proposal handler - validates and creates attestations
|
|
257
|
+
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
258
|
+
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
259
|
+
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
260
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
261
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
262
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
263
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
264
|
+
});
|
|
265
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
266
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
267
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
268
|
+
});
|
|
269
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
270
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
271
|
+
});
|
|
157
272
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
158
273
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
159
274
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
160
275
|
}
|
|
161
276
|
}
|
|
162
|
-
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
277
|
+
/**
|
|
278
|
+
* Validate a block proposal from a peer.
|
|
279
|
+
* Note: Validators do NOT attest to individual blocks - attestations are only for checkpoint proposals.
|
|
280
|
+
* @returns true if the proposal is valid, false otherwise
|
|
281
|
+
*/ async validateBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender) {
|
|
282
|
+
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
283
|
+
// Note: During escape hatch, we still want to "validate" proposals for observability,
|
|
284
|
+
// but we intentionally reject them and disable slashing invalid block and attestation flow.
|
|
285
|
+
const escapeHatchOpen = await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
164
286
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
165
287
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
166
288
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
167
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
168
|
-
return
|
|
289
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
290
|
+
return false;
|
|
169
291
|
}
|
|
170
|
-
//
|
|
292
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
293
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
294
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
295
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
296
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
297
|
+
});
|
|
298
|
+
}
|
|
299
|
+
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
171
300
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
172
301
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
173
302
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
174
303
|
...proposal.toBlockInfo(),
|
|
175
304
|
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
176
305
|
};
|
|
177
|
-
this.log.info(`Received proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
306
|
+
this.log.info(`Received block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
178
307
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
179
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString())
|
|
308
|
+
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
309
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
180
310
|
});
|
|
181
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
182
|
-
|
|
183
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals } = this.config;
|
|
184
|
-
const shouldReexecute = slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals;
|
|
185
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute);
|
|
311
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
312
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
186
313
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
187
|
-
this.log.warn(`Proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
188
314
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
315
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
189
316
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
190
317
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
191
318
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -197,26 +324,182 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
197
324
|
if (badProposalReasons.includes(reason)) {
|
|
198
325
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsBadProposal(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
199
326
|
} else {
|
|
200
|
-
// Node issues so we can't
|
|
327
|
+
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
201
328
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
202
329
|
}
|
|
203
|
-
|
|
204
|
-
|
|
205
|
-
|
|
330
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
331
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
332
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
333
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
334
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
335
|
+
});
|
|
206
336
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
337
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
207
338
|
}
|
|
339
|
+
return false;
|
|
340
|
+
}
|
|
341
|
+
this.log.info(`Validated block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
342
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
343
|
+
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
344
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false,
|
|
345
|
+
escapeHatchOpen
|
|
346
|
+
});
|
|
347
|
+
if (escapeHatchOpen) {
|
|
348
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
349
|
+
return false;
|
|
350
|
+
}
|
|
351
|
+
return true;
|
|
352
|
+
}
|
|
353
|
+
/**
|
|
354
|
+
* Validate and attest to a checkpoint proposal from a peer.
|
|
355
|
+
* The proposal is received as CheckpointProposalCore (without lastBlock) since
|
|
356
|
+
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
357
|
+
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
358
|
+
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
359
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
360
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
361
|
+
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
362
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
363
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
208
364
|
return undefined;
|
|
209
365
|
}
|
|
366
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
367
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
368
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
369
|
+
}
|
|
370
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
371
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
372
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
373
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
374
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
375
|
+
});
|
|
376
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
377
|
+
}
|
|
378
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
379
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
380
|
+
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
381
|
+
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
382
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
383
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
384
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
385
|
+
};
|
|
386
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
387
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
388
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
389
|
+
});
|
|
390
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
391
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
392
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
393
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
394
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
395
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
396
|
+
} else {
|
|
397
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
398
|
+
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
399
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
400
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
401
|
+
}
|
|
402
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
403
|
+
}
|
|
210
404
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
211
|
-
if
|
|
405
|
+
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
406
|
+
if (!partOfCommittee && !this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
212
407
|
this.log.verbose(`No validator in the current committee, skipping attestation`, proposalInfo);
|
|
213
408
|
return undefined;
|
|
214
409
|
}
|
|
215
410
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
216
|
-
this.log.info(
|
|
411
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
412
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
413
|
+
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
414
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
415
|
+
});
|
|
217
416
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
218
|
-
//
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
417
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
418
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
419
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
420
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
421
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
422
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
423
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
424
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
425
|
+
}
|
|
426
|
+
}
|
|
427
|
+
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
428
|
+
let attestors;
|
|
429
|
+
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
430
|
+
attestors = inCommittee;
|
|
431
|
+
} else if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
432
|
+
// In fisherman mode, create attestations for validation purposes even if not in committee. These won't be broadcast.
|
|
433
|
+
attestors = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
434
|
+
} else {
|
|
435
|
+
attestors = [];
|
|
436
|
+
}
|
|
437
|
+
// Only create attestations if we have attestors
|
|
438
|
+
if (attestors.length === 0) {
|
|
439
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
440
|
+
}
|
|
441
|
+
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
442
|
+
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
443
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
444
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
445
|
+
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
446
|
+
});
|
|
447
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
448
|
+
}
|
|
449
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
450
|
+
}
|
|
451
|
+
/**
|
|
452
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
453
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
454
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
455
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
456
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
457
|
+
return true;
|
|
458
|
+
}
|
|
459
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
460
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
461
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
462
|
+
return false;
|
|
463
|
+
}
|
|
464
|
+
return true;
|
|
465
|
+
}
|
|
466
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
467
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
468
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
469
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
470
|
+
}
|
|
471
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
472
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
473
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
474
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
475
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
476
|
+
}
|
|
477
|
+
/**
|
|
478
|
+
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
479
|
+
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
480
|
+
try {
|
|
481
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
482
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
483
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
484
|
+
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
485
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
486
|
+
return;
|
|
487
|
+
}
|
|
488
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
489
|
+
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
490
|
+
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
491
|
+
return;
|
|
492
|
+
}
|
|
493
|
+
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
494
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
495
|
+
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
496
|
+
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
497
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
498
|
+
numBlobs: blobs.length
|
|
499
|
+
});
|
|
500
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
501
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs for checkpoint: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
502
|
+
}
|
|
220
503
|
}
|
|
221
504
|
slashInvalidBlock(proposal) {
|
|
222
505
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
@@ -225,77 +508,225 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
225
508
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
226
509
|
return;
|
|
227
510
|
}
|
|
228
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
229
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
230
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
231
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
232
|
-
}
|
|
233
511
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
234
512
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
235
513
|
{
|
|
236
514
|
validator: proposer,
|
|
237
515
|
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
238
516
|
offenseType: OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL,
|
|
239
|
-
epochOrSlot: proposal.slotNumber
|
|
517
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
518
|
+
}
|
|
519
|
+
]);
|
|
520
|
+
}
|
|
521
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
522
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
523
|
+
return;
|
|
524
|
+
}
|
|
525
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
526
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
527
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
528
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
529
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
530
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
531
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
532
|
+
});
|
|
533
|
+
}
|
|
534
|
+
}
|
|
535
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
536
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
537
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
538
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
539
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
540
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
541
|
+
});
|
|
542
|
+
return false;
|
|
543
|
+
}
|
|
544
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
545
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
546
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
547
|
+
return false;
|
|
548
|
+
}
|
|
549
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
550
|
+
{
|
|
551
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
552
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
553
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
554
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
555
|
+
}
|
|
556
|
+
]);
|
|
557
|
+
return true;
|
|
558
|
+
}
|
|
559
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
560
|
+
this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.add(slotNumber);
|
|
561
|
+
}
|
|
562
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
563
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
564
|
+
if (!this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber) || this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
565
|
+
return;
|
|
566
|
+
}
|
|
567
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
568
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
569
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
570
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
571
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
572
|
+
});
|
|
573
|
+
return;
|
|
574
|
+
}
|
|
575
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
576
|
+
}
|
|
577
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
578
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
579
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
580
|
+
return;
|
|
581
|
+
}
|
|
582
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
583
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
584
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
585
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
586
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
587
|
+
});
|
|
588
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
589
|
+
{
|
|
590
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
591
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
592
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
593
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
594
|
+
}
|
|
595
|
+
]);
|
|
596
|
+
}
|
|
597
|
+
/**
|
|
598
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
599
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
600
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
601
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
602
|
+
this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.add(slot);
|
|
603
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
604
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
605
|
+
slot,
|
|
606
|
+
type,
|
|
607
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
608
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
609
|
+
});
|
|
610
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
611
|
+
{
|
|
612
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
613
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
614
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
615
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
616
|
+
}
|
|
617
|
+
]);
|
|
618
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
619
|
+
{
|
|
620
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
621
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
240
622
|
}
|
|
241
623
|
]);
|
|
242
624
|
}
|
|
243
|
-
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
625
|
+
/**
|
|
626
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
627
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
628
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
629
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
630
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
631
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
632
|
+
slot,
|
|
633
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
634
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
635
|
+
});
|
|
636
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
637
|
+
{
|
|
638
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
639
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
640
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
641
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
642
|
+
}
|
|
643
|
+
]);
|
|
644
|
+
}
|
|
645
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
646
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
647
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
648
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
649
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
650
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
651
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
652
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
653
|
+
}
|
|
247
654
|
}
|
|
248
|
-
|
|
655
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
656
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
249
657
|
...options,
|
|
250
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
658
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
251
659
|
});
|
|
252
|
-
this.
|
|
660
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
661
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
662
|
+
}
|
|
663
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
664
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
665
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
666
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
667
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
668
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
669
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
670
|
+
}
|
|
671
|
+
}
|
|
672
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
673
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
674
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
675
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
676
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
677
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
678
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
679
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
680
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
681
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
253
682
|
return newProposal;
|
|
254
683
|
}
|
|
255
684
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
256
685
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
257
686
|
}
|
|
258
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer) {
|
|
259
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer);
|
|
687
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
688
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
260
689
|
}
|
|
261
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
262
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
690
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
691
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
263
692
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
264
693
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
265
694
|
inCommittee
|
|
266
695
|
});
|
|
267
|
-
|
|
696
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
697
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
698
|
+
return [];
|
|
699
|
+
}
|
|
700
|
+
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
701
|
+
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
702
|
+
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
703
|
+
void this.p2pClient.broadcastCheckpointAttestations(attestations).catch((err)=>{
|
|
704
|
+
this.log.error(`Failed to broadcast self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, err);
|
|
705
|
+
});
|
|
706
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
268
707
|
}
|
|
269
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
270
|
-
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this
|
|
271
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
708
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
709
|
+
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
710
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
272
711
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
273
712
|
if (+deadline < this.dateProvider.now()) {
|
|
274
713
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
275
714
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
276
715
|
}
|
|
277
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
278
|
-
const
|
|
716
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
717
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
279
718
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
280
719
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
281
720
|
while(true){
|
|
282
|
-
//
|
|
283
|
-
//
|
|
284
|
-
|
|
285
|
-
|
|
286
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched payload from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
287
|
-
attestationPayload: attestation.payload,
|
|
288
|
-
proposalPayload: proposal.payload
|
|
289
|
-
});
|
|
290
|
-
return false;
|
|
291
|
-
}
|
|
292
|
-
return true;
|
|
293
|
-
});
|
|
721
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
722
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
723
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
724
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
294
725
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
295
726
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
296
727
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
297
728
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
298
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
729
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
299
730
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
300
731
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
301
732
|
continue;
|
|
@@ -317,11 +748,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
317
748
|
await sleep(this.config.attestationPollingIntervalMs);
|
|
318
749
|
}
|
|
319
750
|
}
|
|
320
|
-
async createBlockAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
321
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
322
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addAttestations(attestations);
|
|
323
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
324
|
-
}
|
|
325
751
|
async handleAuthRequest(peer, msg) {
|
|
326
752
|
const authRequest = AuthRequest.fromBuffer(msg);
|
|
327
753
|
const statusMessage = await this.p2pClient.handleAuthRequestFromPeer(authRequest, peer).catch((_)=>undefined);
|
|
@@ -336,7 +762,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
336
762
|
return Buffer.alloc(0);
|
|
337
763
|
}
|
|
338
764
|
const payloadToSign = authRequest.getPayloadToSign();
|
|
339
|
-
|
|
765
|
+
// AUTH_REQUEST doesn't require HA protection - multiple signatures are safe
|
|
766
|
+
const context = {
|
|
767
|
+
dutyType: DutyType.AUTH_REQUEST
|
|
768
|
+
};
|
|
769
|
+
const signature = await this.keyStore.signMessageWithAddress(addressToUse, payloadToSign, context);
|
|
340
770
|
const authResponse = new AuthResponse(statusMessage, signature);
|
|
341
771
|
return authResponse.toBuffer();
|
|
342
772
|
}
|