@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.4d3c002 → 0.0.1-commit.4d9804df
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +12 -9
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +6 -4
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +16 -8
- package/dest/config.d.ts +9 -3
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +23 -5
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +12 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +32 -38
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +4 -1
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +16 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -2
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +32 -41
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +5 -1
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +12 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +71 -13
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +400 -156
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +30 -11
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +215 -62
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +16 -7
- package/src/config.ts +31 -7
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +51 -47
- package/src/factory.ts +20 -1
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +43 -59
- package/src/metrics.ts +18 -0
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +466 -179
- package/src/validator.ts +281 -80
package/src/proposal_handler.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -4,10 +4,16 @@ import { type Blob, encodeCheckpointBlobDataFromBlocks, getBlobsPerL1Block } fro
|
|
|
4
4
|
import { INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM } from '@aztec/constants';
|
|
5
5
|
import type { EpochCache } from '@aztec/epoch-cache';
|
|
6
6
|
import { validateFeeAssetPriceModifier } from '@aztec/ethereum/contracts';
|
|
7
|
-
import {
|
|
7
|
+
import {
|
|
8
|
+
BlockNumber,
|
|
9
|
+
CheckpointNumber,
|
|
10
|
+
type CheckpointProposalHash,
|
|
11
|
+
SlotNumber,
|
|
12
|
+
} from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
8
13
|
import { pick } from '@aztec/foundation/collection';
|
|
9
14
|
import { Fr } from '@aztec/foundation/curves/bn254';
|
|
10
15
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
16
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
11
17
|
import type { LogData } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
12
18
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
13
19
|
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
@@ -15,8 +21,9 @@ import { DateProvider, Timer } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
|
15
21
|
import type { P2P, PeerId } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
16
22
|
import { BlockProposalValidator } from '@aztec/p2p/msg_validators';
|
|
17
23
|
import type { BlockData, L2Block, L2BlockSink, L2BlockSource } from '@aztec/stdlib/block';
|
|
18
|
-
import {
|
|
19
|
-
import {
|
|
24
|
+
import type { CheckpointReexecutionTracker, ReexecutionOutcome } from '@aztec/stdlib/checkpoint';
|
|
25
|
+
import { getPreviousCheckpointOutHashes, validateCheckpoint } from '@aztec/stdlib/checkpoint';
|
|
26
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
20
27
|
import { Gas } from '@aztec/stdlib/gas';
|
|
21
28
|
import type { ITxProvider, ValidatorClientFullConfig, WorldStateSynchronizer } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
|
|
22
29
|
import {
|
|
@@ -25,6 +32,7 @@ import {
|
|
|
25
32
|
computeInHashFromL1ToL2Messages,
|
|
26
33
|
} from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
27
34
|
import type { BlockProposal, CheckpointAttestation, CheckpointProposalCore } from '@aztec/stdlib/p2p';
|
|
35
|
+
import type { ConsensusTimetable } from '@aztec/stdlib/timetable';
|
|
28
36
|
import { MerkleTreeId } from '@aztec/stdlib/trees';
|
|
29
37
|
import type { CheckpointGlobalVariables, FailedTx, Tx } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
|
|
30
38
|
import {
|
|
@@ -40,9 +48,9 @@ import type { FullNodeCheckpointsBuilder } from './checkpoint_builder.js';
|
|
|
40
48
|
import type { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
41
49
|
|
|
42
50
|
export type BlockProposalValidationFailureReason =
|
|
51
|
+
| 'invalid_signature'
|
|
43
52
|
| 'invalid_proposal'
|
|
44
53
|
| 'parent_block_not_found'
|
|
45
|
-
| 'block_source_not_synced'
|
|
46
54
|
| 'parent_block_wrong_slot'
|
|
47
55
|
| 'in_hash_mismatch'
|
|
48
56
|
| 'global_variables_mismatch'
|
|
@@ -52,6 +60,8 @@ export type BlockProposalValidationFailureReason =
|
|
|
52
60
|
| 'failed_txs'
|
|
53
61
|
| 'initial_state_mismatch'
|
|
54
62
|
| 'timeout'
|
|
63
|
+
| 'block_proposal_beyond_checkpoint'
|
|
64
|
+
| 'checkpoint_proposal_equivocation'
|
|
55
65
|
| 'unknown_error';
|
|
56
66
|
|
|
57
67
|
type ReexecuteTransactionsResult = {
|
|
@@ -76,29 +86,144 @@ export type BlockProposalValidationFailureResult = {
|
|
|
76
86
|
|
|
77
87
|
export type BlockProposalValidationResult = BlockProposalValidationSuccessResult | BlockProposalValidationFailureResult;
|
|
78
88
|
|
|
79
|
-
export type
|
|
89
|
+
export type CheckpointProposalValidationFailureReason =
|
|
90
|
+
| 'invalid_signature'
|
|
91
|
+
| 'invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier'
|
|
92
|
+
| 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
93
|
+
| 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
94
|
+
| 'checkpoint_already_published'
|
|
95
|
+
| 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
96
|
+
| 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
97
|
+
| 'too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint'
|
|
98
|
+
| 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
99
|
+
| 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
100
|
+
| 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
101
|
+
| 'checkpoint_validation_failed';
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
/**
|
|
104
|
+
* Mapping from a checkpoint-proposal validation failure reason to the tracker outcome that
|
|
105
|
+
* `handleCheckpointProposal` should record. `undefined` means do not record (signature
|
|
106
|
+
* couldn't be verified, or the checkpoint is already on L1 so the question is moot).
|
|
107
|
+
*/
|
|
108
|
+
/* eslint-disable camelcase */
|
|
109
|
+
const CHECKPOINT_VALIDATION_REASON_TO_OUTCOME: Record<
|
|
110
|
+
CheckpointProposalValidationFailureReason,
|
|
111
|
+
ReexecutionOutcome | undefined
|
|
112
|
+
> = {
|
|
113
|
+
invalid_signature: undefined,
|
|
114
|
+
invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier: 'invalid',
|
|
115
|
+
checkpoint_already_published: undefined,
|
|
116
|
+
last_block_not_found: 'unvalidated',
|
|
117
|
+
block_fetch_error: 'unvalidated',
|
|
118
|
+
no_blocks_for_slot: 'unvalidated',
|
|
119
|
+
last_block_archive_mismatch: 'invalid',
|
|
120
|
+
too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint: 'invalid',
|
|
121
|
+
checkpoint_header_mismatch: 'invalid',
|
|
122
|
+
archive_mismatch: 'invalid',
|
|
123
|
+
out_hash_mismatch: 'invalid',
|
|
124
|
+
checkpoint_validation_failed: 'invalid',
|
|
125
|
+
};
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
export type CheckpointProposalValidationSuccessResult = {
|
|
128
|
+
isValid: true;
|
|
129
|
+
checkpointNumber: CheckpointNumber;
|
|
130
|
+
};
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
export type CheckpointProposalValidationFailureResult = {
|
|
133
|
+
isValid: false;
|
|
134
|
+
reason: CheckpointProposalValidationFailureReason;
|
|
135
|
+
checkpointNumber?: CheckpointNumber;
|
|
136
|
+
};
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
export type CheckpointProposalValidationResult =
|
|
139
|
+
| CheckpointProposalValidationSuccessResult
|
|
140
|
+
| CheckpointProposalValidationFailureResult;
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
export type CheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback = (
|
|
143
|
+
proposal: CheckpointProposalCore,
|
|
144
|
+
result: CheckpointProposalValidationFailureResult,
|
|
145
|
+
proposalInfo: LogData,
|
|
146
|
+
) => void | Promise<void>;
|
|
80
147
|
|
|
81
148
|
type CheckpointComputationResult =
|
|
82
149
|
| { checkpointNumber: CheckpointNumber; reason?: undefined }
|
|
83
150
|
| { checkpointNumber?: undefined; reason: 'invalid_proposal' | 'global_variables_mismatch' };
|
|
84
151
|
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
152
|
+
type BlockProposalSlotValidationResult =
|
|
153
|
+
| { isValid: true }
|
|
154
|
+
| { isValid: false; reason: 'block_proposal_beyond_checkpoint' | 'checkpoint_proposal_equivocation' };
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS = 1000;
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
/** Block-proposal validation failures that constitute a slashable invalid-block offense. */
|
|
159
|
+
export const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT: BlockProposalValidationFailureReason[] = [
|
|
160
|
+
'state_mismatch',
|
|
161
|
+
'failed_txs',
|
|
162
|
+
'global_variables_mismatch',
|
|
163
|
+
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
164
|
+
'parent_block_wrong_slot',
|
|
165
|
+
'in_hash_mismatch',
|
|
166
|
+
];
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
/** Checkpoint-proposal validation failures that constitute a slashable invalid-checkpoint offense. */
|
|
169
|
+
export const SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT: Record<
|
|
170
|
+
CheckpointProposalValidationFailureReason,
|
|
171
|
+
boolean
|
|
172
|
+
> = {
|
|
173
|
+
// enabled
|
|
174
|
+
['invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier']: true,
|
|
175
|
+
['checkpoint_header_mismatch']: true,
|
|
176
|
+
// These late mismatches should normally be caught by earlier checks, but if reached after validating the local
|
|
177
|
+
// checkpoint inputs, the proposer-signed payload disagrees with deterministic recomputation.
|
|
178
|
+
['archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
179
|
+
['out_hash_mismatch']: true,
|
|
180
|
+
['no_blocks_for_slot']: true,
|
|
181
|
+
['too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint']: true,
|
|
182
|
+
['checkpoint_validation_failed']: true,
|
|
183
|
+
['last_block_archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
// disabled
|
|
186
|
+
['invalid_signature']: false,
|
|
187
|
+
['last_block_not_found']: false,
|
|
188
|
+
['block_fetch_error']: false,
|
|
189
|
+
['checkpoint_already_published']: false,
|
|
190
|
+
};
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
/**
|
|
193
|
+
* Handles block and checkpoint proposals for both validator and non-validator nodes. Also tracks which slots
|
|
194
|
+
* had a slashable invalid proposal or a proposal equivocation, exposing them via the
|
|
195
|
+
* `InvalidProposalSlotSource` interface consumed by the attested-invalid-proposal slashing watcher. The
|
|
196
|
+
* tracking is populated as a side effect of validating/re-executing proposals, so any node that re-executes
|
|
197
|
+
* proposals (the default) can serve it — not only validators.
|
|
198
|
+
*/
|
|
86
199
|
export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
87
200
|
public readonly tracer: Tracer;
|
|
88
201
|
|
|
89
|
-
/** Cached last checkpoint validation result to avoid double-validation on validator nodes.
|
|
202
|
+
/** Cached last checkpoint validation result to avoid double-validation on validator nodes.
|
|
203
|
+
* Keyed by signed-payload hash so two proposals at the same (slot, archive) but with a
|
|
204
|
+
* different `feeAssetPriceModifier` (or any other signed field) are validated independently. */
|
|
90
205
|
private lastCheckpointValidationResult?: {
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
slotNumber: SlotNumber;
|
|
206
|
+
payloadHash: CheckpointProposalHash;
|
|
93
207
|
result: CheckpointProposalValidationResult;
|
|
94
208
|
};
|
|
95
209
|
|
|
96
210
|
/** Archiver reference for setting proposed checkpoints (pipelining). Set via register(). */
|
|
97
|
-
private archiver?: Pick<Archiver, '
|
|
211
|
+
private archiver?: Pick<Archiver, 'addProposedCheckpoint' | 'getProposedCheckpointData'>;
|
|
98
212
|
|
|
99
213
|
/** Returns current validator addresses for own-proposal detection. Set via register(). */
|
|
100
214
|
private getOwnValidatorAddresses?: () => string[];
|
|
101
215
|
|
|
216
|
+
/** P2P proposal pool access for deciding when retained proposals should block archiver processing. */
|
|
217
|
+
private p2pClient?: Pick<P2P, 'getProposalsForSlot'>;
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
private checkpointProposalValidationFailureCallback?: CheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback;
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
/** Slots at which a slashable invalid block or checkpoint proposal was observed. */
|
|
222
|
+
private readonly slotsWithInvalidProposals = FifoSet.withLimit<SlotNumber>(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS);
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
/** Slots at which a proposal equivocation was observed; suppresses attested-to-invalid-proposal slashing. */
|
|
225
|
+
private readonly slotsWithProposalEquivocation = FifoSet.withLimit<SlotNumber>(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS);
|
|
226
|
+
|
|
102
227
|
constructor(
|
|
103
228
|
private checkpointsBuilder: FullNodeCheckpointsBuilder,
|
|
104
229
|
private worldState: WorldStateSynchronizer,
|
|
@@ -107,8 +232,10 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
107
232
|
private txProvider: ITxProvider,
|
|
108
233
|
private blockProposalValidator: BlockProposalValidator,
|
|
109
234
|
private epochCache: EpochCache,
|
|
235
|
+
private timetable: ConsensusTimetable,
|
|
110
236
|
private config: ValidatorClientFullConfig,
|
|
111
237
|
private blobClient: BlobClientInterface,
|
|
238
|
+
private reexecutionTracker: CheckpointReexecutionTracker,
|
|
112
239
|
private metrics?: ValidatorMetrics,
|
|
113
240
|
private dateProvider: DateProvider = new DateProvider(),
|
|
114
241
|
telemetry: TelemetryClient = getTelemetryClient(),
|
|
@@ -120,8 +247,52 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
120
247
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('ProposalHandler');
|
|
121
248
|
}
|
|
122
249
|
|
|
250
|
+
public updateConfig(config: Partial<ValidatorClientFullConfig>): void {
|
|
251
|
+
this.config = { ...this.config, ...config };
|
|
252
|
+
}
|
|
253
|
+
|
|
254
|
+
public setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback(callback?: CheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback): void {
|
|
255
|
+
this.checkpointProposalValidationFailureCallback = callback;
|
|
256
|
+
}
|
|
257
|
+
|
|
258
|
+
/**
|
|
259
|
+
* Records the proposer's own checkpoint proposal as a `valid` outcome in the re-execution
|
|
260
|
+
* tracker. Without this, the node's own checkpoint proposals never flow through
|
|
261
|
+
* `handleCheckpointProposal` (proposers don't validate their own proposals), so its sentinel
|
|
262
|
+
* sees no outcome for slots where it was the proposer and reports itself as inactive.
|
|
263
|
+
*
|
|
264
|
+
* `archive` should be the locally-computed archive (NOT the broadcast archive, which may have
|
|
265
|
+
* been deliberately corrupted in tests via `broadcastInvalidBlockProposal` /
|
|
266
|
+
* `broadcastInvalidCheckpointProposalOnly`). Recording the local archive correctly models the
|
|
267
|
+
* proposer's own view of its own work.
|
|
268
|
+
*/
|
|
269
|
+
public recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(slot: SlotNumber, archive: Fr, checkpointNumber: CheckpointNumber): void {
|
|
270
|
+
this.reexecutionTracker.recordOutcome(slot, archive, 'valid', checkpointNumber);
|
|
271
|
+
}
|
|
272
|
+
|
|
273
|
+
/** Whether a slashable invalid block or checkpoint proposal was observed at the given slot (InvalidProposalSlotSource). */
|
|
274
|
+
public hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber: SlotNumber): boolean {
|
|
275
|
+
return this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber);
|
|
276
|
+
}
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
/** Whether a proposal equivocation was observed at the given slot (InvalidProposalSlotSource). */
|
|
279
|
+
public hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber: SlotNumber): boolean {
|
|
280
|
+
return this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber);
|
|
281
|
+
}
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
/** Records a slot as having a slashable invalid proposal, for offense observers (sentinel/slasher watchers). */
|
|
284
|
+
public markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber: SlotNumber): void {
|
|
285
|
+
this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.add(slotNumber);
|
|
286
|
+
}
|
|
287
|
+
|
|
288
|
+
/** Records a slot as having a proposal equivocation, which suppresses attested-to-invalid-proposal slashing. */
|
|
289
|
+
public markProposalEquivocation(slotNumber: SlotNumber): void {
|
|
290
|
+
this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.add(slotNumber);
|
|
291
|
+
}
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
123
293
|
/**
|
|
124
294
|
* Registers handlers for block and checkpoint proposals on the p2p client.
|
|
295
|
+
* Records the p2p client so validation can inspect retained proposals.
|
|
125
296
|
* Block proposals are registered for non-validator nodes (validators register their own enhanced handler).
|
|
126
297
|
* The all-nodes checkpoint proposal handler is always registered for validation, caching, and pipelining.
|
|
127
298
|
* @param archiver - Archiver reference for setting proposed checkpoints (pipelining)
|
|
@@ -130,9 +301,10 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
130
301
|
register(
|
|
131
302
|
p2pClient: P2P,
|
|
132
303
|
shouldReexecute: boolean,
|
|
133
|
-
archiver?: Pick<Archiver, '
|
|
304
|
+
archiver?: Pick<Archiver, 'addProposedCheckpoint' | 'getProposedCheckpointData'>,
|
|
134
305
|
getOwnValidatorAddresses?: () => string[],
|
|
135
306
|
): ProposalHandler {
|
|
307
|
+
this.p2pClient = p2pClient;
|
|
136
308
|
this.archiver = archiver;
|
|
137
309
|
this.getOwnValidatorAddresses = getOwnValidatorAddresses;
|
|
138
310
|
|
|
@@ -153,6 +325,18 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
153
325
|
});
|
|
154
326
|
return true;
|
|
155
327
|
} else {
|
|
328
|
+
// Track invalid proposals / equivocations so offense observers (the attested-invalid-proposal
|
|
329
|
+
// watcher) work on non-validator nodes too. Validators populate these via their own handlers.
|
|
330
|
+
// Skip invalid-proposal marking while the escape hatch is open, matching the validator path,
|
|
331
|
+
// which intentionally disables invalid-block slashing then.
|
|
332
|
+
if (result.reason === 'checkpoint_proposal_equivocation') {
|
|
333
|
+
this.markProposalEquivocation(slotNumber);
|
|
334
|
+
} else if (
|
|
335
|
+
SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(result.reason) &&
|
|
336
|
+
!(await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber))
|
|
337
|
+
) {
|
|
338
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
339
|
+
}
|
|
156
340
|
this.log.warn(
|
|
157
341
|
`Non-validator block proposal ${blockNumber} at slot ${slotNumber} failed processing with ${result.reason}`,
|
|
158
342
|
{ blockNumber: result.blockNumber, slotNumber, reason: result.reason },
|
|
@@ -167,6 +351,11 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
167
351
|
|
|
168
352
|
p2pClient.registerBlockProposalHandler(blockHandler);
|
|
169
353
|
|
|
354
|
+
// p2p detects duplicate (equivocated) proposals without routing them through the handlers above, so mark
|
|
355
|
+
// the slot as equivocated here. This suppresses false-positive attested-to-invalid-proposal slashing on
|
|
356
|
+
// non-validator offense collectors. Validators overwrite this with their own richer handler.
|
|
357
|
+
p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback(info => this.markProposalEquivocation(info.slot));
|
|
358
|
+
|
|
170
359
|
// All-nodes checkpoint proposal handler: validates, caches, and sets proposed checkpoint for pipelining.
|
|
171
360
|
// Runs for all nodes (validators and non-validators). Validators get the cached result in the
|
|
172
361
|
// validator-specific callback (attestToCheckpointProposal) which runs after this one.
|
|
@@ -175,28 +364,58 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
175
364
|
_sender: PeerId,
|
|
176
365
|
): Promise<CheckpointAttestation[] | undefined> => {
|
|
177
366
|
try {
|
|
367
|
+
const pipeliningTimer = new Timer();
|
|
178
368
|
const proposalInfo: LogData = {
|
|
179
369
|
slot: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
180
370
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
181
371
|
proposer: proposal.getSender()?.toString(),
|
|
182
372
|
};
|
|
183
373
|
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
374
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
375
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
376
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
377
|
+
}
|
|
378
|
+
|
|
379
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
380
|
+
this.log.warn(
|
|
381
|
+
`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposal.slotNumber}, skipping checkpoint proposal validation`,
|
|
382
|
+
proposalInfo,
|
|
383
|
+
);
|
|
384
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
385
|
+
}
|
|
386
|
+
|
|
387
|
+
// A proposal is "own" when it was signed by a validator key this node also owns. The true local
|
|
388
|
+
// proposer already built, validated, and stored this checkpoint before broadcasting, so a matching
|
|
389
|
+
// proposed checkpoint is already in its archiver — skip the redundant re-validation. An HA peer that
|
|
390
|
+
// shares the proposer's keys sees the same "own" proposal over gossip but never built it, so it has
|
|
391
|
+
// nothing stored; it falls through to the normal validate-and-persist path below to hydrate the
|
|
392
|
+
// proposed-checkpoint metadata it needs to build the next slot on top of this checkpoint.
|
|
185
393
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
186
394
|
const ownAddresses = this.getOwnValidatorAddresses?.();
|
|
187
395
|
const isOwnProposal = proposer && ownAddresses?.some(addr => addr === proposer.toString());
|
|
188
396
|
|
|
189
397
|
if (isOwnProposal) {
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
if (
|
|
192
|
-
|
|
398
|
+
const existing = await this.archiver?.getProposedCheckpointData({ slot: proposal.slotNumber });
|
|
399
|
+
if (existing?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
400
|
+
this.log.debug(`Skipping sync for existing own checkpoint proposal at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
401
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
193
402
|
}
|
|
194
|
-
return undefined;
|
|
195
403
|
}
|
|
196
404
|
|
|
197
405
|
const result = await this.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
198
|
-
if (result.isValid
|
|
199
|
-
|
|
406
|
+
if (!result.isValid) {
|
|
407
|
+
// Track invalid checkpoint proposals so offense observers (the attested-invalid-proposal watcher)
|
|
408
|
+
// work on non-validator nodes too. This handler runs for all nodes; validators also mark via the
|
|
409
|
+
// failure callback below (idempotent).
|
|
410
|
+
if (SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
411
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
412
|
+
}
|
|
413
|
+
await this.checkpointProposalValidationFailureCallback?.(proposal, result, proposalInfo);
|
|
414
|
+
} else if (this.archiver) {
|
|
415
|
+
const set = await this.setProposedCheckpoint(proposal);
|
|
416
|
+
if (set) {
|
|
417
|
+
this.metrics?.recordCheckpointProposalToPipelinedStateDuration(pipeliningTimer.ms());
|
|
418
|
+
}
|
|
200
419
|
}
|
|
201
420
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
202
421
|
this.log.warn(`Error handling checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, { err });
|
|
@@ -216,12 +435,11 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
216
435
|
): Promise<BlockProposalValidationResult> {
|
|
217
436
|
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
218
437
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
219
|
-
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
220
438
|
|
|
221
439
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
222
440
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
223
441
|
this.log.warn(`Received proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
224
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: '
|
|
442
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'invalid_signature' };
|
|
225
443
|
}
|
|
226
444
|
|
|
227
445
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
@@ -244,21 +462,20 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
244
462
|
return { isValid: false, reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
245
463
|
}
|
|
246
464
|
|
|
247
|
-
|
|
248
|
-
|
|
249
|
-
|
|
250
|
-
|
|
251
|
-
|
|
252
|
-
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
254
|
-
|
|
255
|
-
const blockSourceSync = await this.waitForBlockSourceSync(slotNumber);
|
|
256
|
-
if (!blockSourceSync) {
|
|
257
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block source is not synced, skipping processing`, proposalInfo);
|
|
258
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: 'block_source_not_synced' };
|
|
259
|
-
}
|
|
465
|
+
const retainedSlotValidation = await this.validateNewBlockInSlot(proposal);
|
|
466
|
+
if (!retainedSlotValidation.isValid) {
|
|
467
|
+
this.log.info(`Block proposal conflicts with retained proposals, skipping archiver processing`, {
|
|
468
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
469
|
+
indexWithinCheckpoint: proposal.indexWithinCheckpoint,
|
|
470
|
+
reason: retainedSlotValidation.reason,
|
|
471
|
+
});
|
|
472
|
+
return { isValid: false, blockNumber: proposal.blockNumber, reason: retainedSlotValidation.reason };
|
|
260
473
|
}
|
|
261
474
|
|
|
475
|
+
// The proposer builds ahead of L1 submission under pipelining, so the block source won't have
|
|
476
|
+
// synced to the proposed slot yet. We deliberately do not wait for it to sync here, to avoid
|
|
477
|
+
// eating into the attestation window.
|
|
478
|
+
|
|
262
479
|
// Check that the parent proposal is a block we know, otherwise reexecution would fail.
|
|
263
480
|
// If we don't find it immediately, we keep retrying for a while; it may be we still
|
|
264
481
|
// need to process other block proposals to get to it.
|
|
@@ -285,8 +502,12 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
285
502
|
: BlockNumber(parentBlock.header.getBlockNumber() + 1);
|
|
286
503
|
proposalInfo.blockNumber = blockNumber;
|
|
287
504
|
|
|
288
|
-
// Check that this block number does not exist already
|
|
289
|
-
|
|
505
|
+
// Check that this block number does not exist already. During a reorg the archiver can still hold a
|
|
506
|
+
// stale block at this number (a different archive, about to be pruned) while the proposal carries the
|
|
507
|
+
// rebuilt replacement; resolveExistingBlockAtNumber waits for the local prune in that case so the
|
|
508
|
+
// rebuilt block is processed in time to attest, rather than being permanently dropped on a bare
|
|
509
|
+
// number collision.
|
|
510
|
+
const existingBlock = await this.resolveExistingBlockAtNumber(blockNumber, proposal.archive, slotNumber);
|
|
290
511
|
if (existingBlock) {
|
|
291
512
|
this.log.warn(`Block number ${blockNumber} already exists, skipping processing`, proposalInfo);
|
|
292
513
|
return { isValid: false, blockNumber, reason: 'block_number_already_exists' };
|
|
@@ -296,9 +517,12 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
296
517
|
// and we do it even if we don't plan to re-execute the txs, so that we have them if another node needs them.
|
|
297
518
|
const { txs, missingTxs } = await this.txProvider.getTxsForBlockProposal(proposal, blockNumber, {
|
|
298
519
|
pinnedPeer: proposalSender,
|
|
299
|
-
deadline: this.getReexecutionDeadline(slotNumber
|
|
520
|
+
deadline: this.getReexecutionDeadline(slotNumber),
|
|
300
521
|
});
|
|
301
522
|
|
|
523
|
+
// Record the tx-collection outcome on the re-execution tracker
|
|
524
|
+
this.reexecutionTracker.recordTxsCollected(slotNumber, proposal.indexWithinCheckpoint, missingTxs.length === 0);
|
|
525
|
+
|
|
302
526
|
// If reexecution is disabled, bail. We were just interested in triggering tx collection.
|
|
303
527
|
if (!shouldReexecute) {
|
|
304
528
|
this.log.info(
|
|
@@ -335,11 +559,18 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
335
559
|
return { isValid: false, blockNumber, reason: 'txs_not_available' };
|
|
336
560
|
}
|
|
337
561
|
|
|
338
|
-
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
562
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch.
|
|
563
|
+
// Mirror the proposer-side fallback: under pipelining the immediately-preceding cp may not
|
|
564
|
+
// yet be on L1, in which case the helper grafts the locally-known proposed cp's outHash.
|
|
339
565
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
340
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes =
|
|
341
|
-
|
|
342
|
-
|
|
566
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = await getPreviousCheckpointOutHashes({
|
|
567
|
+
blockSource: this.blockSource,
|
|
568
|
+
epoch,
|
|
569
|
+
checkpointNumber,
|
|
570
|
+
l1Constants: this.epochCache.getL1Constants(),
|
|
571
|
+
pipeliningEnabled: true,
|
|
572
|
+
log: this.log,
|
|
573
|
+
});
|
|
343
574
|
|
|
344
575
|
// Try re-executing the transactions in the proposal if needed
|
|
345
576
|
let reexecutionResult;
|
|
@@ -360,7 +591,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
360
591
|
}
|
|
361
592
|
|
|
362
593
|
// If we succeeded, push this block into the archiver (unless disabled)
|
|
363
|
-
if (reexecutionResult?.block && this.config.skipPushProposedBlocksToArchiver
|
|
594
|
+
if (reexecutionResult?.block && !this.config.skipPushProposedBlocksToArchiver) {
|
|
364
595
|
await this.blockSource.addBlock(reexecutionResult.block);
|
|
365
596
|
}
|
|
366
597
|
|
|
@@ -372,29 +603,47 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
372
603
|
return { isValid: true, blockNumber, reexecutionResult };
|
|
373
604
|
}
|
|
374
605
|
|
|
606
|
+
private async validateNewBlockInSlot(blockProposal: BlockProposal): Promise<BlockProposalSlotValidationResult> {
|
|
607
|
+
if (!this.p2pClient) {
|
|
608
|
+
return { isValid: true };
|
|
609
|
+
}
|
|
610
|
+
|
|
611
|
+
const { blockProposals, checkpointProposals } = await this.p2pClient.getProposalsForSlot(blockProposal.slotNumber);
|
|
612
|
+
|
|
613
|
+
if (checkpointProposals.length === 0) {
|
|
614
|
+
return { isValid: true };
|
|
615
|
+
} else if (checkpointProposals.length > 1) {
|
|
616
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'checkpoint_proposal_equivocation' };
|
|
617
|
+
} else {
|
|
618
|
+
const checkpointProposal = checkpointProposals[0];
|
|
619
|
+
const terminalBlock = blockProposals.find(block => block.archive.equals(checkpointProposal.archive));
|
|
620
|
+
return terminalBlock !== undefined && blockProposal.indexWithinCheckpoint > terminalBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint
|
|
621
|
+
? { isValid: false, reason: 'block_proposal_beyond_checkpoint' }
|
|
622
|
+
: { isValid: true };
|
|
623
|
+
}
|
|
624
|
+
}
|
|
625
|
+
|
|
375
626
|
private async getParentBlock(proposal: BlockProposal): Promise<'genesis' | BlockData | undefined> {
|
|
376
627
|
const parentArchive = proposal.blockHeader.lastArchive.root;
|
|
377
|
-
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
378
|
-
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
379
628
|
const { genesisArchiveRoot } = await this.blockSource.getGenesisValues();
|
|
380
629
|
|
|
381
630
|
if (parentArchive.equals(genesisArchiveRoot)) {
|
|
382
631
|
return 'genesis';
|
|
383
632
|
}
|
|
384
633
|
|
|
385
|
-
const deadline = this.getReexecutionDeadline(
|
|
386
|
-
const
|
|
387
|
-
const timeoutDurationMs = deadline.getTime() - currentTime;
|
|
634
|
+
const deadline = this.getReexecutionDeadline(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
635
|
+
const timeoutDurationMs = deadline.getTime() - this.dateProvider.now();
|
|
388
636
|
|
|
389
637
|
try {
|
|
390
638
|
return (
|
|
391
|
-
(await this.blockSource.
|
|
639
|
+
(await this.blockSource.getBlockData({ archive: parentArchive })) ??
|
|
392
640
|
(timeoutDurationMs <= 0
|
|
393
641
|
? undefined
|
|
394
642
|
: await retryUntil(
|
|
395
|
-
() =>
|
|
643
|
+
() =>
|
|
644
|
+
this.blockSource.syncImmediate().then(() => this.blockSource.getBlockData({ archive: parentArchive })),
|
|
396
645
|
'force archiver sync',
|
|
397
|
-
|
|
646
|
+
{ deadline, dateProvider: this.dateProvider },
|
|
398
647
|
0.5,
|
|
399
648
|
))
|
|
400
649
|
);
|
|
@@ -408,6 +657,63 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
408
657
|
}
|
|
409
658
|
}
|
|
410
659
|
|
|
660
|
+
/**
|
|
661
|
+
* Resolves whether a block genuinely already exists at `blockNumber`. Returns the existing block only if
|
|
662
|
+
* it is a true duplicate of the proposal (matching archive). During a reorg the archiver can still hold a
|
|
663
|
+
* stale fork at this number (different archive) that is about to be pruned; in that case this forces L1
|
|
664
|
+
* sync and waits, bounded by the re-execution deadline, for the prune to land, then returns `undefined` so
|
|
665
|
+
* the rebuilt block proposal can be processed in time to attest. If the prune does not complete before the
|
|
666
|
+
* deadline it returns the stale block, so the caller falls back to the safe `block_number_already_exists`
|
|
667
|
+
* rejection.
|
|
668
|
+
*/
|
|
669
|
+
private async resolveExistingBlockAtNumber(
|
|
670
|
+
blockNumber: BlockNumber,
|
|
671
|
+
proposalArchive: Fr,
|
|
672
|
+
slotNumber: SlotNumber,
|
|
673
|
+
): Promise<BlockData | undefined> {
|
|
674
|
+
const existingBlock = await this.blockSource.getBlockData({ number: blockNumber });
|
|
675
|
+
if (!existingBlock || existingBlock.archive.root.equals(proposalArchive)) {
|
|
676
|
+
return existingBlock;
|
|
677
|
+
}
|
|
678
|
+
|
|
679
|
+
// A different block already occupies this number: it may be a stale fork being pruned during a reorg, not a
|
|
680
|
+
// genuine duplicate. Wait for the local prune rather than permanently rejecting the proposal.
|
|
681
|
+
const deadline = this.getReexecutionDeadline(slotNumber);
|
|
682
|
+
if (deadline.getTime() - this.dateProvider.now() <= 0) {
|
|
683
|
+
return existingBlock;
|
|
684
|
+
}
|
|
685
|
+
|
|
686
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block number ${blockNumber} already exists, awaiting potential prune`, {
|
|
687
|
+
blockNumber,
|
|
688
|
+
existingArchive: existingBlock.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
689
|
+
proposalArchive: proposalArchive.toString(),
|
|
690
|
+
});
|
|
691
|
+
|
|
692
|
+
try {
|
|
693
|
+
const { block } = await retryUntil(
|
|
694
|
+
async () => {
|
|
695
|
+
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
696
|
+
const block = await this.blockSource.getBlockData({ number: blockNumber });
|
|
697
|
+
// Resolve once the existing block is gone (pruned) or has been replaced by one matching the
|
|
698
|
+
// proposal — the same condition as the early return above. A matching block is returned so the
|
|
699
|
+
// caller still treats it as a genuine duplicate; an `undefined` (pruned) block lets the proposal
|
|
700
|
+
// be processed. Wrap in an object so the `undefined` case is still a truthy retry result.
|
|
701
|
+
return block === undefined || block.archive.root.equals(proposalArchive) ? { block } : undefined;
|
|
702
|
+
},
|
|
703
|
+
`prune of stale block ${blockNumber}`,
|
|
704
|
+
{ deadline, dateProvider: this.dateProvider },
|
|
705
|
+
0.5,
|
|
706
|
+
);
|
|
707
|
+
return block;
|
|
708
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
709
|
+
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
710
|
+
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for stale block ${blockNumber} to be pruned`, { blockNumber });
|
|
711
|
+
return existingBlock;
|
|
712
|
+
}
|
|
713
|
+
throw err;
|
|
714
|
+
}
|
|
715
|
+
}
|
|
716
|
+
|
|
411
717
|
private computeCheckpointNumber(
|
|
412
718
|
proposal: BlockProposal,
|
|
413
719
|
parentBlock: 'genesis' | BlockData,
|
|
@@ -531,45 +837,14 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
531
837
|
return undefined;
|
|
532
838
|
}
|
|
533
839
|
|
|
534
|
-
|
|
535
|
-
|
|
536
|
-
|
|
537
|
-
|
|
538
|
-
|
|
539
|
-
|
|
540
|
-
private
|
|
541
|
-
|
|
542
|
-
const timeoutMs = deadline.getTime() - this.dateProvider.now();
|
|
543
|
-
if (slot === 0) {
|
|
544
|
-
return true;
|
|
545
|
-
}
|
|
546
|
-
|
|
547
|
-
// Make a quick check before triggering an archiver sync
|
|
548
|
-
const syncedSlot = await this.blockSource.getSyncedL2SlotNumber();
|
|
549
|
-
if (syncedSlot !== undefined && syncedSlot + 1 >= slot) {
|
|
550
|
-
return true;
|
|
551
|
-
}
|
|
552
|
-
|
|
553
|
-
try {
|
|
554
|
-
// Trigger an immediate sync of the block source, and wait until it reports being synced to the required slot
|
|
555
|
-
return await retryUntil(
|
|
556
|
-
async () => {
|
|
557
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
558
|
-
const syncedSlot = await this.blockSource.getSyncedL2SlotNumber();
|
|
559
|
-
return syncedSlot !== undefined && syncedSlot + 1 >= slot;
|
|
560
|
-
},
|
|
561
|
-
'wait for block source sync',
|
|
562
|
-
timeoutMs / 1000,
|
|
563
|
-
0.5,
|
|
564
|
-
);
|
|
565
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
566
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
567
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block source to sync to slot ${slot}`);
|
|
568
|
-
return false;
|
|
569
|
-
} else {
|
|
570
|
-
throw err;
|
|
571
|
-
}
|
|
572
|
-
}
|
|
840
|
+
/**
|
|
841
|
+
* Hard re-execution/validation deadline for any block or checkpoint proposal targeting `slotNumber`:
|
|
842
|
+
* the single consensus `attestation_deadline` (`target_slot_start + S - 2E`). This is the latest the
|
|
843
|
+
* checkpoint can land on L1 in the target slot; all nodes agree on it. Loosened from the previous
|
|
844
|
+
* next-wall-clock-slot-boundary bound (see the timetable spec / refactor notes).
|
|
845
|
+
*/
|
|
846
|
+
private getReexecutionDeadline(slotNumber: SlotNumber): Date {
|
|
847
|
+
return new Date(this.timetable.getAttestationDeadline(slotNumber) * 1000);
|
|
573
848
|
}
|
|
574
849
|
|
|
575
850
|
private getReexecuteFailureReason(err: any): BlockProposalValidationFailureReason {
|
|
@@ -601,7 +876,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
601
876
|
// If we do not have all of the transactions, then we should fail
|
|
602
877
|
if (txs.length !== txHashes.length) {
|
|
603
878
|
const foundTxHashes = txs.map(tx => tx.getTxHash());
|
|
604
|
-
const missingTxHashes = txHashes.filter(txHash => !foundTxHashes.
|
|
879
|
+
const missingTxHashes = txHashes.filter(txHash => !foundTxHashes.some(h => h.equals(txHash)));
|
|
605
880
|
throw new TransactionsNotAvailableError(missingTxHashes);
|
|
606
881
|
}
|
|
607
882
|
|
|
@@ -649,7 +924,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
649
924
|
);
|
|
650
925
|
|
|
651
926
|
// Build the new block
|
|
652
|
-
const deadline = this.getReexecutionDeadline(slot
|
|
927
|
+
const deadline = this.getReexecutionDeadline(slot);
|
|
653
928
|
const maxBlockGas =
|
|
654
929
|
this.config.validateMaxL2BlockGas !== undefined || this.config.validateMaxDABlockGas !== undefined
|
|
655
930
|
? new Gas(this.config.validateMaxDABlockGas ?? Infinity, this.config.validateMaxL2BlockGas ?? Infinity)
|
|
@@ -722,36 +997,46 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
722
997
|
proposalInfo: LogData,
|
|
723
998
|
): Promise<CheckpointProposalValidationResult> {
|
|
724
999
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
1000
|
+
const payloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
725
1001
|
|
|
726
|
-
// Check cache: same
|
|
727
|
-
if (
|
|
728
|
-
this.lastCheckpointValidationResult &&
|
|
729
|
-
this.lastCheckpointValidationResult.archive.equals(proposal.archive) &&
|
|
730
|
-
this.lastCheckpointValidationResult.slotNumber === slot
|
|
731
|
-
) {
|
|
1002
|
+
// Check cache: same signed-payload hash means we already validated this exact proposal.
|
|
1003
|
+
if (this.lastCheckpointValidationResult && this.lastCheckpointValidationResult.payloadHash === payloadHash) {
|
|
732
1004
|
this.log.debug(`Returning cached validation result for checkpoint proposal at slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
733
1005
|
return this.lastCheckpointValidationResult.result;
|
|
734
1006
|
}
|
|
735
1007
|
|
|
736
1008
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
1009
|
+
let result: CheckpointProposalValidationResult;
|
|
737
1010
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
738
1011
|
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
739
|
-
|
|
740
|
-
|
|
741
|
-
return result;
|
|
742
|
-
}
|
|
743
|
-
|
|
744
|
-
if (!validateFeeAssetPriceModifier(proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier)) {
|
|
1012
|
+
result = { isValid: false as const, reason: 'invalid_signature' };
|
|
1013
|
+
} else if (!validateFeeAssetPriceModifier(proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier)) {
|
|
745
1014
|
this.log.warn(
|
|
746
1015
|
`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`,
|
|
747
1016
|
);
|
|
748
|
-
|
|
749
|
-
|
|
750
|
-
|
|
1017
|
+
result = { isValid: false, reason: 'invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier' };
|
|
1018
|
+
} else {
|
|
1019
|
+
result = await this.validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
751
1020
|
}
|
|
752
1021
|
|
|
753
|
-
|
|
754
|
-
|
|
1022
|
+
this.lastCheckpointValidationResult = { payloadHash, result };
|
|
1023
|
+
|
|
1024
|
+
// Record the outcome on the re-execution tracker.
|
|
1025
|
+
const outcome = result.isValid ? ('valid' as const) : CHECKPOINT_VALIDATION_REASON_TO_OUTCOME[result.reason];
|
|
1026
|
+
if (outcome !== undefined) {
|
|
1027
|
+
this.reexecutionTracker.recordOutcome(slot, proposal.archive, outcome, result.checkpointNumber);
|
|
1028
|
+
}
|
|
1029
|
+
|
|
1030
|
+
// Drop tracker entries for checkpoints that have reached L1 finality.
|
|
1031
|
+
try {
|
|
1032
|
+
const tips = await this.blockSource.getL2Tips();
|
|
1033
|
+
const finalizedCheckpointNumber = tips.finalized.checkpoint.number;
|
|
1034
|
+
if (finalizedCheckpointNumber > 0) {
|
|
1035
|
+
this.reexecutionTracker.removeBefore(CheckpointNumber(finalizedCheckpointNumber + 1));
|
|
1036
|
+
}
|
|
1037
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
1038
|
+
this.log.error(`Error pruning reexecution tracker`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
1039
|
+
}
|
|
755
1040
|
|
|
756
1041
|
// Upload blobs to filestore if validation passed (fire and forget)
|
|
757
1042
|
if (result.isValid) {
|
|
@@ -771,21 +1056,24 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
771
1056
|
): Promise<CheckpointProposalValidationResult> {
|
|
772
1057
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
773
1058
|
|
|
774
|
-
//
|
|
775
|
-
|
|
776
|
-
|
|
777
|
-
|
|
1059
|
+
// Block-sync/validation deadline = the single consensus attestation_deadline (target_slot_start + S
|
|
1060
|
+
// - 2E): the latest moment the proposer can submit this checkpoint and still have it land on L1 in
|
|
1061
|
+
// the target slot. Keeping validation/attestation alive until then lets validators keep attesting
|
|
1062
|
+
// right up to the proposer's real publish cutoff.
|
|
1063
|
+
const deadline = this.getReexecutionDeadline(slot);
|
|
778
1064
|
|
|
779
|
-
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
780
|
-
|
|
1065
|
+
// Wait for last block to sync by archive. The deadline is passed to retryUntil as an absolute date so
|
|
1066
|
+
// the remaining budget is derived from the date provider; a deadline already in the past times out
|
|
1067
|
+
// after a single attempt instead of looping (the immediate-timeout semantics of the deadline overload).
|
|
1068
|
+
let lastBlockData;
|
|
781
1069
|
try {
|
|
782
|
-
|
|
1070
|
+
lastBlockData = await retryUntil(
|
|
783
1071
|
async () => {
|
|
784
1072
|
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
785
|
-
return this.blockSource.
|
|
1073
|
+
return await this.blockSource.getBlockData({ archive: proposal.archive });
|
|
786
1074
|
},
|
|
787
1075
|
`waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`,
|
|
788
|
-
|
|
1076
|
+
{ deadline, dateProvider: this.dateProvider },
|
|
789
1077
|
0.5,
|
|
790
1078
|
);
|
|
791
1079
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
@@ -797,22 +1085,55 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
797
1085
|
return { isValid: false, reason: 'block_fetch_error' };
|
|
798
1086
|
}
|
|
799
1087
|
|
|
800
|
-
if (!
|
|
1088
|
+
if (!lastBlockData) {
|
|
801
1089
|
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
802
1090
|
return { isValid: false, reason: 'last_block_not_found' };
|
|
803
1091
|
}
|
|
804
1092
|
|
|
1093
|
+
// Refuse to attest if the block's enclosing checkpoint has already been published to L1.
|
|
1094
|
+
const existingCheckpoint = await this.blockSource.getCheckpointData({ number: lastBlockData.checkpointNumber });
|
|
1095
|
+
if (existingCheckpoint) {
|
|
1096
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to attest to checkpoint proposal whose checkpoint is already on L1`, {
|
|
1097
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
1098
|
+
checkpointNumber: lastBlockData.checkpointNumber,
|
|
1099
|
+
});
|
|
1100
|
+
return {
|
|
1101
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
1102
|
+
reason: 'checkpoint_already_published',
|
|
1103
|
+
checkpointNumber: lastBlockData.checkpointNumber,
|
|
1104
|
+
};
|
|
1105
|
+
}
|
|
1106
|
+
|
|
805
1107
|
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
806
1108
|
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
807
1109
|
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
808
1110
|
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
809
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot' };
|
|
1111
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot', checkpointNumber: lastBlockData.checkpointNumber };
|
|
810
1112
|
}
|
|
811
1113
|
|
|
812
1114
|
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
813
1115
|
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
814
1116
|
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
815
|
-
return {
|
|
1117
|
+
return {
|
|
1118
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
1119
|
+
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch',
|
|
1120
|
+
checkpointNumber: lastBlockData.checkpointNumber,
|
|
1121
|
+
};
|
|
1122
|
+
}
|
|
1123
|
+
|
|
1124
|
+
// Note this condition should never trigger, since we dont process block proposals that exceed indexWithinCheckpoint
|
|
1125
|
+
const maxBlocksPerCheckpoint = this.config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint;
|
|
1126
|
+
if (maxBlocksPerCheckpoint !== undefined && blocks.length > maxBlocksPerCheckpoint) {
|
|
1127
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal exceeds maxBlocksPerCheckpoint`, {
|
|
1128
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
1129
|
+
blocksInProposal: blocks.length,
|
|
1130
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
1131
|
+
});
|
|
1132
|
+
return {
|
|
1133
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
1134
|
+
reason: 'too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint',
|
|
1135
|
+
checkpointNumber: lastBlockData.checkpointNumber,
|
|
1136
|
+
};
|
|
816
1137
|
}
|
|
817
1138
|
|
|
818
1139
|
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
@@ -828,11 +1149,17 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
828
1149
|
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
829
1150
|
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
830
1151
|
|
|
831
|
-
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
1152
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch.
|
|
1153
|
+
// See note on the analogous block-proposal site: the helper handles pipelining lag.
|
|
832
1154
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
833
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes =
|
|
834
|
-
|
|
835
|
-
|
|
1155
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = await getPreviousCheckpointOutHashes({
|
|
1156
|
+
blockSource: this.blockSource,
|
|
1157
|
+
epoch,
|
|
1158
|
+
checkpointNumber,
|
|
1159
|
+
l1Constants: this.epochCache.getL1Constants(),
|
|
1160
|
+
pipeliningEnabled: true,
|
|
1161
|
+
log: this.log,
|
|
1162
|
+
});
|
|
836
1163
|
|
|
837
1164
|
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
838
1165
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
@@ -860,7 +1187,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
860
1187
|
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
861
1188
|
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect(),
|
|
862
1189
|
});
|
|
863
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch' };
|
|
1190
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch', checkpointNumber };
|
|
864
1191
|
}
|
|
865
1192
|
|
|
866
1193
|
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
@@ -870,7 +1197,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
870
1197
|
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
871
1198
|
proposal: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
872
1199
|
});
|
|
873
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: 'archive_mismatch' };
|
|
1200
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'archive_mismatch', checkpointNumber };
|
|
874
1201
|
}
|
|
875
1202
|
|
|
876
1203
|
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
@@ -886,7 +1213,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
886
1213
|
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map(h => h.toString()),
|
|
887
1214
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
888
1215
|
});
|
|
889
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: 'out_hash_mismatch' };
|
|
1216
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'out_hash_mismatch', checkpointNumber };
|
|
890
1217
|
}
|
|
891
1218
|
|
|
892
1219
|
// Final round of validations on the checkpoint, just in case.
|
|
@@ -900,11 +1227,12 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
900
1227
|
});
|
|
901
1228
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
902
1229
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint validation failed: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
903
|
-
return { isValid: false, reason: 'checkpoint_validation_failed' };
|
|
1230
|
+
return { isValid: false, reason: 'checkpoint_validation_failed', checkpointNumber };
|
|
904
1231
|
}
|
|
905
1232
|
|
|
906
1233
|
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
907
|
-
|
|
1234
|
+
|
|
1235
|
+
return { isValid: true, checkpointNumber };
|
|
908
1236
|
}
|
|
909
1237
|
|
|
910
1238
|
/** Extracts checkpoint global variables from a block. */
|
|
@@ -931,7 +1259,7 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
931
1259
|
/** Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore. */
|
|
932
1260
|
protected async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal: CheckpointProposalCore, proposalInfo: LogData): Promise<void> {
|
|
933
1261
|
try {
|
|
934
|
-
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.
|
|
1262
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({ archive: proposal.archive }))?.header;
|
|
935
1263
|
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
936
1264
|
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
937
1265
|
return;
|
|
@@ -957,23 +1285,23 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
957
1285
|
}
|
|
958
1286
|
|
|
959
1287
|
/**
|
|
960
|
-
* Derives proposed checkpoint data from validated blocks and sets it on the archiver
|
|
961
|
-
*
|
|
962
|
-
*
|
|
1288
|
+
* Derives proposed checkpoint data from validated blocks and sets it on the archiver, so this node can
|
|
1289
|
+
* pipeline building on top of the checkpoint. Does not retry, since validation already waited for the
|
|
1290
|
+
* last block to sync.
|
|
963
1291
|
*/
|
|
964
|
-
private async
|
|
1292
|
+
private async setProposedCheckpoint(proposal: CheckpointProposalCore): Promise<boolean> {
|
|
965
1293
|
if (!this.archiver) {
|
|
966
|
-
return;
|
|
1294
|
+
return false;
|
|
967
1295
|
}
|
|
968
|
-
const blockData = await this.blockSource.
|
|
1296
|
+
const blockData = await this.blockSource.getBlockData({ archive: proposal.archive });
|
|
969
1297
|
if (!blockData) {
|
|
970
1298
|
this.log.debug(`Block data not found for checkpoint proposal archive, cannot set proposed checkpoint`, {
|
|
971
1299
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
972
1300
|
});
|
|
973
|
-
return;
|
|
1301
|
+
return false;
|
|
974
1302
|
}
|
|
975
1303
|
|
|
976
|
-
await this.archiver.
|
|
1304
|
+
await this.archiver.addProposedCheckpoint({
|
|
977
1305
|
header: proposal.checkpointHeader,
|
|
978
1306
|
checkpointNumber: blockData.checkpointNumber,
|
|
979
1307
|
startBlock: BlockNumber(blockData.header.getBlockNumber() - blockData.indexWithinCheckpoint),
|
|
@@ -981,47 +1309,6 @@ export class ProposalHandler {
|
|
|
981
1309
|
totalManaUsed: proposal.checkpointHeader.totalManaUsed.toBigInt(),
|
|
982
1310
|
feeAssetPriceModifier: proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
983
1311
|
});
|
|
984
|
-
|
|
985
|
-
|
|
986
|
-
/**
|
|
987
|
-
* Sets proposed checkpoint from blocks for own proposals (skips full validation).
|
|
988
|
-
* Retries fetching block data since the checkpoint proposal often arrives before the last block
|
|
989
|
-
* finishes re-execution.
|
|
990
|
-
*/
|
|
991
|
-
private async setProposedCheckpointFromBlocks(proposal: CheckpointProposalCore): Promise<void> {
|
|
992
|
-
if (!this.archiver) {
|
|
993
|
-
return;
|
|
994
|
-
}
|
|
995
|
-
let blockData = await this.blockSource.getBlockDataByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
996
|
-
|
|
997
|
-
if (!blockData) {
|
|
998
|
-
// The checkpoint proposal often arrives before the last block finishes re-execution.
|
|
999
|
-
// Retry until we find the data or give up at the end of the slot.
|
|
1000
|
-
const nextSlot = this.epochCache.getSlotNow() + 1;
|
|
1001
|
-
const timeOfNextSlot = getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(nextSlot), await this.archiver.getL1Constants());
|
|
1002
|
-
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, Number(timeOfNextSlot) - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
1003
|
-
|
|
1004
|
-
blockData = await retryUntil(
|
|
1005
|
-
() => this.blockSource.getBlockDataByArchive(proposal.archive),
|
|
1006
|
-
'block data for own checkpoint proposal',
|
|
1007
|
-
timeoutSeconds,
|
|
1008
|
-
0.25,
|
|
1009
|
-
).catch(() => undefined);
|
|
1010
|
-
}
|
|
1011
|
-
|
|
1012
|
-
if (blockData) {
|
|
1013
|
-
await this.archiver.setProposedCheckpoint({
|
|
1014
|
-
header: proposal.checkpointHeader,
|
|
1015
|
-
checkpointNumber: blockData.checkpointNumber,
|
|
1016
|
-
startBlock: BlockNumber(blockData.header.getBlockNumber() - blockData.indexWithinCheckpoint),
|
|
1017
|
-
blockCount: blockData.indexWithinCheckpoint + 1,
|
|
1018
|
-
totalManaUsed: proposal.checkpointHeader.totalManaUsed.toBigInt(),
|
|
1019
|
-
feeAssetPriceModifier: proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
1020
|
-
});
|
|
1021
|
-
} else {
|
|
1022
|
-
this.log.debug(`Block data not found for own checkpoint proposal archive, cannot set proposed checkpoint`, {
|
|
1023
|
-
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
1024
|
-
});
|
|
1025
|
-
}
|
|
1312
|
+
return true;
|
|
1026
1313
|
}
|
|
1027
1314
|
}
|