@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.1142ef1 → 0.0.1-commit.125b3452
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +96 -24
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +12 -11
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +132 -77
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +32 -25
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +144 -49
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +33 -14
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +20 -7
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +69 -22
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +3 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts +1 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +0 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +99 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +208 -0
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.js +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts +36 -6
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.js +8 -4
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts +18 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js +18 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +8 -4
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +12 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +46 -5
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +45 -18
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +263 -99
- package/package.json +21 -17
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +163 -95
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +206 -61
- package/src/config.ts +32 -13
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +94 -25
- package/src/factory.ts +2 -0
- package/src/index.ts +0 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +269 -0
- package/src/key_store/index.ts +1 -0
- package/src/key_store/interface.ts +44 -5
- package/src/key_store/local_key_store.ts +13 -4
- package/src/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.ts +27 -4
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +17 -4
- package/src/metrics.ts +63 -6
- package/src/validator.ts +329 -118
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -18
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -53
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -133
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
+
import { validateFeeAssetPriceModifier } from '@aztec/ethereum/contracts';
|
|
3
|
+
import { BlockNumber, SlotNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
4
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
4
5
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
6
|
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
@@ -8,11 +9,17 @@ import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
|
8
9
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
10
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
11
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
12
|
+
import { validateCheckpoint } from '@aztec/stdlib/checkpoint';
|
|
13
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot, getTimestampForSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
14
|
+
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
11
15
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
12
16
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
17
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
18
|
+
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
13
19
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
14
20
|
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
15
21
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
22
|
+
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
16
23
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
17
24
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
18
25
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
@@ -36,6 +43,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
36
43
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
37
44
|
config;
|
|
38
45
|
blobClient;
|
|
46
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
39
47
|
dateProvider;
|
|
40
48
|
tracer;
|
|
41
49
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -43,17 +51,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
43
51
|
log;
|
|
44
52
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
45
53
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
54
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
55
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
48
56
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
49
57
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
58
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
50
59
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
validatedBlockSlots;
|
|
55
|
-
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
56
|
-
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set(), this.validatedBlockSlots = new Set();
|
|
60
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
61
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
62
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
57
63
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
58
64
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
59
65
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -92,6 +98,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
92
98
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
93
99
|
return;
|
|
94
100
|
}
|
|
101
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
95
102
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
96
103
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
97
104
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -107,13 +114,36 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
107
114
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
108
115
|
}
|
|
109
116
|
}
|
|
110
|
-
static new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
117
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
111
118
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
112
119
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
113
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
120
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
121
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock
|
|
114
122
|
});
|
|
115
|
-
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, config, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
116
|
-
const
|
|
123
|
+
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
124
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
125
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
126
|
+
if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
127
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
128
|
+
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
129
|
+
const haConfig = {
|
|
130
|
+
...config,
|
|
131
|
+
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
132
|
+
};
|
|
133
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
134
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
135
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
136
|
+
}));
|
|
137
|
+
} else {
|
|
138
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
139
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
140
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
141
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
142
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
143
|
+
}));
|
|
144
|
+
}
|
|
145
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
146
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
117
147
|
return validator;
|
|
118
148
|
}
|
|
119
149
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
@@ -122,8 +152,8 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
122
152
|
getBlockProposalHandler() {
|
|
123
153
|
return this.blockProposalHandler;
|
|
124
154
|
}
|
|
125
|
-
signWithAddress(addr, msg) {
|
|
126
|
-
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg);
|
|
155
|
+
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
156
|
+
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
127
157
|
}
|
|
128
158
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
129
159
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
@@ -140,11 +170,17 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
140
170
|
...config
|
|
141
171
|
};
|
|
142
172
|
}
|
|
173
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
174
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
175
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
176
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
177
|
+
}
|
|
143
178
|
async start() {
|
|
144
179
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
145
180
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
146
181
|
return;
|
|
147
182
|
}
|
|
183
|
+
await this.keyStore.start();
|
|
148
184
|
await this.registerHandlers();
|
|
149
185
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
150
186
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee('now', myAddresses);
|
|
@@ -157,6 +193,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
157
193
|
}
|
|
158
194
|
async stop() {
|
|
159
195
|
await this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.stop();
|
|
196
|
+
await this.keyStore.stop();
|
|
160
197
|
}
|
|
161
198
|
/** Register handlers on the p2p client */ async registerHandlers() {
|
|
162
199
|
if (!this.hasRegisteredHandlers) {
|
|
@@ -170,6 +207,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
170
207
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
171
208
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
172
209
|
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
210
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
211
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
212
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
213
|
+
});
|
|
214
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
215
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
216
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
217
|
+
});
|
|
173
218
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
174
219
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
175
220
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -181,12 +226,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
181
226
|
* @returns true if the proposal is valid, false otherwise
|
|
182
227
|
*/ async validateBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender) {
|
|
183
228
|
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
229
|
+
// Note: During escape hatch, we still want to "validate" proposals for observability,
|
|
230
|
+
// but we intentionally reject them and disable slashing invalid block and attestation flow.
|
|
231
|
+
const escapeHatchOpen = await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
184
232
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
185
233
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
186
234
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
187
235
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
188
236
|
return false;
|
|
189
237
|
}
|
|
238
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
239
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
240
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
241
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
242
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
243
|
+
});
|
|
244
|
+
return false;
|
|
245
|
+
}
|
|
190
246
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
191
247
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
192
248
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -203,10 +259,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
203
259
|
// In fisherman mode, we always reexecute to validate proposals.
|
|
204
260
|
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
205
261
|
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
206
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute);
|
|
262
|
+
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
207
263
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
208
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
209
264
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
265
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
210
266
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
211
267
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
212
268
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -222,7 +278,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
222
278
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
223
279
|
}
|
|
224
280
|
// Slash invalid block proposals (can happen even when not in committee)
|
|
225
|
-
if (validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason) && slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n) {
|
|
281
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason) && slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n) {
|
|
226
282
|
this.log.warn(`Slashing proposer for invalid block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
227
283
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
228
284
|
}
|
|
@@ -231,11 +287,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
231
287
|
this.log.info(`Validated block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
232
288
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
233
289
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
234
|
-
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
290
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false,
|
|
291
|
+
escapeHatchOpen
|
|
235
292
|
});
|
|
236
|
-
|
|
237
|
-
|
|
238
|
-
|
|
293
|
+
if (escapeHatchOpen) {
|
|
294
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
295
|
+
return false;
|
|
296
|
+
}
|
|
239
297
|
return true;
|
|
240
298
|
}
|
|
241
299
|
/**
|
|
@@ -246,35 +304,44 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
246
304
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
247
305
|
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
248
306
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
307
|
+
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
308
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber)) {
|
|
309
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
310
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
311
|
+
}
|
|
249
312
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
250
313
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
251
314
|
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
252
315
|
return undefined;
|
|
253
316
|
}
|
|
317
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
318
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
319
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
320
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
321
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
322
|
+
});
|
|
323
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
324
|
+
}
|
|
325
|
+
// Validate fee asset price modifier is within allowed range
|
|
326
|
+
if (!validateFeeAssetPriceModifier(proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier)) {
|
|
327
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
328
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
329
|
+
}
|
|
254
330
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
255
331
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
256
332
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
257
333
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
258
334
|
slotNumber,
|
|
259
335
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
260
|
-
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
261
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
336
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
262
337
|
};
|
|
263
338
|
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
264
339
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
265
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
266
340
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
267
341
|
});
|
|
268
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): Remove this once checkpoint validation is stable.
|
|
269
|
-
// Check that we have successfully validated a block for this slot before attesting to the checkpoint.
|
|
270
|
-
if (!this.validatedBlockSlots.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
271
|
-
this.log.warn(`No validated block found for slot ${slotNumber}, refusing to attest to checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
272
|
-
return undefined;
|
|
273
|
-
}
|
|
274
342
|
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
275
|
-
|
|
276
|
-
|
|
277
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
343
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
344
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
278
345
|
} else {
|
|
279
346
|
const validationResult = await this.validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
280
347
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
@@ -299,6 +366,16 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
299
366
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
300
367
|
});
|
|
301
368
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
369
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
370
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(slotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
371
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
372
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
373
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
374
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
375
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
376
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
377
|
+
}
|
|
378
|
+
}
|
|
302
379
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
303
380
|
let attestors;
|
|
304
381
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -321,11 +398,32 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
321
398
|
});
|
|
322
399
|
return undefined;
|
|
323
400
|
}
|
|
324
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
401
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
402
|
+
}
|
|
403
|
+
/**
|
|
404
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
405
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
406
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
407
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
408
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
409
|
+
return true;
|
|
410
|
+
}
|
|
411
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
412
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
413
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
414
|
+
return false;
|
|
415
|
+
}
|
|
416
|
+
return true;
|
|
325
417
|
}
|
|
326
418
|
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
419
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
420
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
421
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
422
|
+
}
|
|
327
423
|
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
328
|
-
|
|
424
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
425
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
426
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
329
427
|
return attestations;
|
|
330
428
|
}
|
|
331
429
|
/**
|
|
@@ -333,7 +431,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
333
431
|
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
334
432
|
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
335
433
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
336
|
-
|
|
434
|
+
// Timeout block syncing at the start of the next slot
|
|
435
|
+
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
436
|
+
const nextSlotTimestampSeconds = Number(getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(slot + 1), config));
|
|
437
|
+
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, nextSlotTimestampSeconds - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
337
438
|
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
338
439
|
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
339
440
|
try {
|
|
@@ -362,18 +463,8 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
362
463
|
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
363
464
|
};
|
|
364
465
|
}
|
|
365
|
-
// Get the last full block to determine checkpoint number
|
|
366
|
-
const lastBlock = await this.blockSource.getL2BlockNew(lastBlockHeader.getBlockNumber());
|
|
367
|
-
if (!lastBlock) {
|
|
368
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block ${lastBlockHeader.getBlockNumber()} not found`, proposalInfo);
|
|
369
|
-
return {
|
|
370
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
371
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
372
|
-
};
|
|
373
|
-
}
|
|
374
|
-
const checkpointNumber = lastBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
375
466
|
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
376
|
-
const blocks = await this.getBlocksForSlot(slot
|
|
467
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
377
468
|
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
378
469
|
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
379
470
|
return {
|
|
@@ -381,6 +472,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
381
472
|
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
382
473
|
};
|
|
383
474
|
}
|
|
475
|
+
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
476
|
+
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
477
|
+
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
478
|
+
return {
|
|
479
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
480
|
+
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
481
|
+
};
|
|
482
|
+
}
|
|
384
483
|
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
385
484
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
386
485
|
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
@@ -388,14 +487,18 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
388
487
|
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
389
488
|
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
390
489
|
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
490
|
+
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
391
491
|
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
392
492
|
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
493
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
494
|
+
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
495
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch)).filter((c)=>c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber).map((c)=>c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
393
496
|
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
394
497
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
395
498
|
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
396
499
|
try {
|
|
397
500
|
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
398
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, fork, blocks);
|
|
501
|
+
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
399
502
|
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
400
503
|
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
401
504
|
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
@@ -422,6 +525,43 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
422
525
|
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
423
526
|
};
|
|
424
527
|
}
|
|
528
|
+
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
529
|
+
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
530
|
+
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
531
|
+
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
532
|
+
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
533
|
+
checkpointOutHash
|
|
534
|
+
]);
|
|
535
|
+
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
536
|
+
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
537
|
+
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
538
|
+
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
539
|
+
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
540
|
+
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
541
|
+
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
542
|
+
...proposalInfo
|
|
543
|
+
});
|
|
544
|
+
return {
|
|
545
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
546
|
+
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
547
|
+
};
|
|
548
|
+
}
|
|
549
|
+
// Final round of validations on the checkpoint, just in case.
|
|
550
|
+
try {
|
|
551
|
+
validateCheckpoint(computedCheckpoint, {
|
|
552
|
+
rollupManaLimit: this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig().rollupManaLimit,
|
|
553
|
+
maxDABlockGas: this.config.validateMaxDABlockGas,
|
|
554
|
+
maxL2BlockGas: this.config.validateMaxL2BlockGas,
|
|
555
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: this.config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
556
|
+
maxTxsPerCheckpoint: this.config.validateMaxTxsPerCheckpoint
|
|
557
|
+
});
|
|
558
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
559
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint validation failed: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
560
|
+
return {
|
|
561
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
562
|
+
reason: 'checkpoint_validation_failed'
|
|
563
|
+
};
|
|
564
|
+
}
|
|
425
565
|
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
426
566
|
return {
|
|
427
567
|
isValid: true
|
|
@@ -431,36 +571,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
431
571
|
}
|
|
432
572
|
}
|
|
433
573
|
/**
|
|
434
|
-
* Get all full blocks for a given slot and checkpoint by walking backwards from the last block.
|
|
435
|
-
* Returns blocks in ascending order (earliest to latest).
|
|
436
|
-
* TODO(palla/mbps): Add getL2BlocksForSlot() to L2BlockSource interface for efficiency.
|
|
437
|
-
*/ async getBlocksForSlot(slot, lastBlockHeader, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
438
|
-
const blocks = [];
|
|
439
|
-
let currentHeader = lastBlockHeader;
|
|
440
|
-
const { genesisArchiveRoot } = await this.blockSource.getGenesisValues();
|
|
441
|
-
while(currentHeader.getSlot() === slot){
|
|
442
|
-
const block = await this.blockSource.getL2BlockNew(currentHeader.getBlockNumber());
|
|
443
|
-
if (!block) {
|
|
444
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block ${currentHeader.getBlockNumber()} not found while getting blocks for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
445
|
-
break;
|
|
446
|
-
}
|
|
447
|
-
if (block.checkpointNumber !== checkpointNumber) {
|
|
448
|
-
break;
|
|
449
|
-
}
|
|
450
|
-
blocks.unshift(block);
|
|
451
|
-
const prevArchive = currentHeader.lastArchive.root;
|
|
452
|
-
if (prevArchive.equals(genesisArchiveRoot)) {
|
|
453
|
-
break;
|
|
454
|
-
}
|
|
455
|
-
const prevHeader = await this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(prevArchive);
|
|
456
|
-
if (!prevHeader || prevHeader.getSlot() !== slot) {
|
|
457
|
-
break;
|
|
458
|
-
}
|
|
459
|
-
currentHeader = prevHeader;
|
|
460
|
-
}
|
|
461
|
-
return blocks;
|
|
462
|
-
}
|
|
463
|
-
/**
|
|
464
574
|
* Extract checkpoint global variables from a block.
|
|
465
575
|
*/ extractCheckpointConstants(block) {
|
|
466
576
|
const gv = block.header.globalVariables;
|
|
@@ -468,6 +578,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
468
578
|
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
469
579
|
version: gv.version,
|
|
470
580
|
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
581
|
+
timestamp: gv.timestamp,
|
|
471
582
|
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
472
583
|
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
473
584
|
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
@@ -482,19 +593,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
482
593
|
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
483
594
|
return;
|
|
484
595
|
}
|
|
485
|
-
|
|
486
|
-
const lastBlock = await this.blockSource.getL2BlockNew(lastBlockHeader.getBlockNumber());
|
|
487
|
-
if (!lastBlock) {
|
|
488
|
-
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
489
|
-
return;
|
|
490
|
-
}
|
|
491
|
-
const blocks = await this.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber, lastBlockHeader, lastBlock.checkpointNumber);
|
|
596
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
492
597
|
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
493
598
|
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
494
599
|
return;
|
|
495
600
|
}
|
|
496
601
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
497
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
602
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
498
603
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
499
604
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
500
605
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -526,29 +631,81 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
526
631
|
}
|
|
527
632
|
]);
|
|
528
633
|
}
|
|
529
|
-
|
|
530
|
-
|
|
531
|
-
|
|
532
|
-
|
|
533
|
-
|
|
534
|
-
|
|
634
|
+
/**
|
|
635
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
636
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
637
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
638
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
639
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate ${type} proposal from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
640
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
641
|
+
slot,
|
|
642
|
+
type
|
|
643
|
+
});
|
|
644
|
+
// Emit slash event
|
|
645
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
646
|
+
{
|
|
647
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
648
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
649
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
650
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
651
|
+
}
|
|
652
|
+
]);
|
|
653
|
+
}
|
|
654
|
+
/**
|
|
655
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
656
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
657
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
658
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
659
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
660
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
661
|
+
slot
|
|
662
|
+
});
|
|
663
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
664
|
+
{
|
|
665
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
666
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
667
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
668
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
669
|
+
}
|
|
670
|
+
]);
|
|
671
|
+
}
|
|
672
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
673
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
674
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
675
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
676
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
677
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
678
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
679
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
680
|
+
}
|
|
681
|
+
}
|
|
535
682
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
536
683
|
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
537
684
|
...options,
|
|
538
685
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
539
686
|
});
|
|
540
|
-
this.
|
|
687
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
541
688
|
return newProposal;
|
|
542
689
|
}
|
|
543
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options) {
|
|
690
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
691
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
692
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
693
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
694
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
695
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
696
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
697
|
+
}
|
|
698
|
+
}
|
|
544
699
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
545
|
-
|
|
700
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
701
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
702
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
546
703
|
}
|
|
547
704
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
548
705
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
549
706
|
}
|
|
550
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer) {
|
|
551
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer);
|
|
707
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, blockNumber) {
|
|
708
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, blockNumber);
|
|
552
709
|
}
|
|
553
710
|
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
554
711
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -557,6 +714,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
557
714
|
inCommittee
|
|
558
715
|
});
|
|
559
716
|
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
717
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
718
|
+
return [];
|
|
719
|
+
}
|
|
560
720
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
561
721
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
562
722
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
@@ -630,7 +790,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
630
790
|
return Buffer.alloc(0);
|
|
631
791
|
}
|
|
632
792
|
const payloadToSign = authRequest.getPayloadToSign();
|
|
633
|
-
|
|
793
|
+
// AUTH_REQUEST doesn't require HA protection - multiple signatures are safe
|
|
794
|
+
const context = {
|
|
795
|
+
dutyType: DutyType.AUTH_REQUEST
|
|
796
|
+
};
|
|
797
|
+
const signature = await this.keyStore.signMessageWithAddress(addressToUse, payloadToSign, context);
|
|
634
798
|
const authResponse = new AuthResponse(statusMessage, signature);
|
|
635
799
|
return authResponse.toBuffer();
|
|
636
800
|
}
|