@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.03f7ef2 → 0.0.1-commit.04d373f
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +325 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +79 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +251 -0
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +48 -14
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +43 -15
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +101 -30
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +22 -13
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +11 -5
- package/dest/index.d.ts +3 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +99 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +208 -0
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.js +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts +36 -6
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.js +8 -4
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts +18 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js +18 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +8 -4
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +16 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +58 -30
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +135 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1111 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +85 -26
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +475 -105
- package/package.json +21 -13
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +417 -0
- package/src/config.ts +47 -12
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +167 -40
- package/src/factory.ts +37 -14
- package/src/index.ts +2 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +269 -0
- package/src/key_store/index.ts +1 -0
- package/src/key_store/interface.ts +44 -5
- package/src/key_store/local_key_store.ts +13 -4
- package/src/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.ts +27 -4
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +17 -4
- package/src/metrics.ts +81 -33
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1207 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +692 -160
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -53
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -290
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -346
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,34 +1,70 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
2
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
3
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
4
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
5
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
6
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
7
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
10
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
8
11
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
9
12
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
13
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
14
|
+
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
10
15
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
11
|
-
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
12
16
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
17
|
+
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
13
18
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
14
19
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
20
|
+
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
15
21
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
16
22
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
17
23
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
24
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS = 1000;
|
|
25
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
18
27
|
// What errors from the block proposal handler result in slashing
|
|
19
28
|
const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
20
29
|
'state_mismatch',
|
|
21
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
30
|
+
'failed_txs',
|
|
31
|
+
'global_variables_mismatch',
|
|
32
|
+
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
33
|
+
'parent_block_wrong_slot',
|
|
34
|
+
'in_hash_mismatch'
|
|
22
35
|
];
|
|
36
|
+
const SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = {
|
|
37
|
+
// enabled
|
|
38
|
+
['invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier']: true,
|
|
39
|
+
['checkpoint_header_mismatch']: true,
|
|
40
|
+
// These late mismatches should normally be caught by earlier checks, but if reached after validating the local
|
|
41
|
+
// checkpoint inputs, the proposer-signed payload disagrees with deterministic recomputation.
|
|
42
|
+
['archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
43
|
+
['out_hash_mismatch']: true,
|
|
44
|
+
['no_blocks_for_slot']: true,
|
|
45
|
+
['too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint']: true,
|
|
46
|
+
['checkpoint_validation_failed']: true,
|
|
47
|
+
['last_block_archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
48
|
+
// disabled
|
|
49
|
+
['invalid_signature']: false,
|
|
50
|
+
['last_block_not_found']: false,
|
|
51
|
+
['block_fetch_error']: false,
|
|
52
|
+
['checkpoint_already_published']: false
|
|
53
|
+
};
|
|
23
54
|
/**
|
|
24
55
|
* Validator Client
|
|
25
56
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
26
57
|
keyStore;
|
|
27
58
|
epochCache;
|
|
28
59
|
p2pClient;
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
60
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
61
|
+
blockSource;
|
|
62
|
+
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
63
|
+
worldState;
|
|
64
|
+
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
30
65
|
config;
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
66
|
+
blobClient;
|
|
67
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
32
68
|
dateProvider;
|
|
33
69
|
tracer;
|
|
34
70
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -36,18 +72,25 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
36
72
|
log;
|
|
37
73
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
38
74
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
75
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
76
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
41
77
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
42
78
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
79
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
43
80
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
81
|
+
slotsWithInvalidProposals;
|
|
82
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
83
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
84
|
+
slotsWithProposalEquivocation;
|
|
85
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
86
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
87
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.slotsWithInvalidProposals = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS), this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS);
|
|
46
88
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
47
89
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
48
90
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
49
91
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
50
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
92
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
93
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
51
94
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
52
95
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
53
96
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -81,6 +124,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
81
124
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
82
125
|
return;
|
|
83
126
|
}
|
|
127
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
84
128
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
85
129
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
86
130
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -96,27 +140,64 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
96
140
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
97
141
|
}
|
|
98
142
|
}
|
|
99
|
-
static new(config,
|
|
143
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
100
144
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
101
145
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
102
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
146
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
147
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
148
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
149
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
150
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
151
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
152
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
153
|
+
}
|
|
103
154
|
});
|
|
104
|
-
const
|
|
105
|
-
const
|
|
155
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
156
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
157
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
158
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
159
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
160
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
161
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
162
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
163
|
+
}));
|
|
164
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
165
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
166
|
+
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
167
|
+
const haConfig = {
|
|
168
|
+
...config,
|
|
169
|
+
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
170
|
+
};
|
|
171
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
172
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
173
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
174
|
+
}));
|
|
175
|
+
} else {
|
|
176
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
177
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
178
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
179
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
180
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
181
|
+
}));
|
|
182
|
+
}
|
|
183
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
184
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
106
185
|
return validator;
|
|
107
186
|
}
|
|
108
187
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
109
188
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
110
189
|
}
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
return this.
|
|
190
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
191
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
113
192
|
}
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
return this.blockProposalHandler.reexecuteTransactions(proposal, blockNumber, txs, l1ToL2Messages);
|
|
193
|
+
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
194
|
+
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
117
195
|
}
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
return
|
|
196
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
197
|
+
return {
|
|
198
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
199
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
200
|
+
};
|
|
120
201
|
}
|
|
121
202
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
122
203
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
@@ -127,17 +208,30 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
127
208
|
getConfig() {
|
|
128
209
|
return this.config;
|
|
129
210
|
}
|
|
211
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
212
|
+
return this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber);
|
|
213
|
+
}
|
|
214
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
215
|
+
return this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber);
|
|
216
|
+
}
|
|
130
217
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
131
218
|
this.config = {
|
|
132
219
|
...this.config,
|
|
133
220
|
...config
|
|
134
221
|
};
|
|
222
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
223
|
+
}
|
|
224
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
225
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
226
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
227
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
135
228
|
}
|
|
136
229
|
async start() {
|
|
137
230
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
138
231
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
139
232
|
return;
|
|
140
233
|
}
|
|
234
|
+
await this.keyStore.start();
|
|
141
235
|
await this.registerHandlers();
|
|
142
236
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
143
237
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee('now', myAddresses);
|
|
@@ -150,47 +244,75 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
150
244
|
}
|
|
151
245
|
async stop() {
|
|
152
246
|
await this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.stop();
|
|
247
|
+
await this.keyStore.stop();
|
|
153
248
|
}
|
|
154
249
|
/** Register handlers on the p2p client */ async registerHandlers() {
|
|
155
250
|
if (!this.hasRegisteredHandlers) {
|
|
156
251
|
this.hasRegisteredHandlers = true;
|
|
157
252
|
this.log.debug(`Registering validator handlers for p2p client`);
|
|
158
|
-
|
|
159
|
-
this.
|
|
253
|
+
// Block proposal handler - validates but does NOT attest (validators only attest to checkpoints)
|
|
254
|
+
const blockHandler = (block, proposalSender)=>this.validateBlockProposal(block, proposalSender);
|
|
255
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerBlockProposalHandler(blockHandler);
|
|
256
|
+
// Checkpoint proposal handler - validates and creates attestations
|
|
257
|
+
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
258
|
+
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
259
|
+
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
260
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
261
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
262
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
263
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
264
|
+
});
|
|
265
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
266
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
267
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
268
|
+
});
|
|
269
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
270
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
271
|
+
});
|
|
160
272
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
161
273
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
162
274
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
163
275
|
}
|
|
164
276
|
}
|
|
165
|
-
|
|
277
|
+
/**
|
|
278
|
+
* Validate a block proposal from a peer.
|
|
279
|
+
* Note: Validators do NOT attest to individual blocks - attestations are only for checkpoint proposals.
|
|
280
|
+
* @returns true if the proposal is valid, false otherwise
|
|
281
|
+
*/ async validateBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender) {
|
|
166
282
|
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
283
|
+
// Note: During escape hatch, we still want to "validate" proposals for observability,
|
|
284
|
+
// but we intentionally reject them and disable slashing invalid block and attestation flow.
|
|
285
|
+
const escapeHatchOpen = await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
167
286
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
168
287
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
169
288
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
170
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
171
|
-
return
|
|
289
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
290
|
+
return false;
|
|
172
291
|
}
|
|
173
|
-
//
|
|
292
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
293
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
294
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
295
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
296
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
297
|
+
});
|
|
298
|
+
}
|
|
299
|
+
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
174
300
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
175
301
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
176
302
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
177
303
|
...proposal.toBlockInfo(),
|
|
178
304
|
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
179
305
|
};
|
|
180
|
-
this.log.info(`Received proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
306
|
+
this.log.info(`Received block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
181
307
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
182
308
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
183
309
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
184
310
|
});
|
|
185
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
186
|
-
|
|
187
|
-
// In fisherman mode, we always reexecute to validate proposals.
|
|
188
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
189
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.fileStoreBlobUploadClient;
|
|
190
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute);
|
|
311
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
312
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
191
313
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
192
|
-
this.log.warn(`Proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
193
314
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
315
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
194
316
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
195
317
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
196
318
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -202,16 +324,83 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
202
324
|
if (badProposalReasons.includes(reason)) {
|
|
203
325
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsBadProposal(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
204
326
|
} else {
|
|
205
|
-
// Node issues so we can't
|
|
327
|
+
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
206
328
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
207
329
|
}
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
|
|
330
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
331
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
332
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
333
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
334
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
335
|
+
});
|
|
211
336
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
337
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
212
338
|
}
|
|
339
|
+
return false;
|
|
340
|
+
}
|
|
341
|
+
this.log.info(`Validated block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
342
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
343
|
+
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
344
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false,
|
|
345
|
+
escapeHatchOpen
|
|
346
|
+
});
|
|
347
|
+
if (escapeHatchOpen) {
|
|
348
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
349
|
+
return false;
|
|
350
|
+
}
|
|
351
|
+
return true;
|
|
352
|
+
}
|
|
353
|
+
/**
|
|
354
|
+
* Validate and attest to a checkpoint proposal from a peer.
|
|
355
|
+
* The proposal is received as CheckpointProposalCore (without lastBlock) since
|
|
356
|
+
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
357
|
+
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
358
|
+
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
359
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
360
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
361
|
+
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
362
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
363
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
364
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
365
|
+
}
|
|
366
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
367
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
368
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
369
|
+
}
|
|
370
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
371
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
372
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
373
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
374
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
375
|
+
});
|
|
213
376
|
return undefined;
|
|
214
377
|
}
|
|
378
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
379
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
380
|
+
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
381
|
+
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
382
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
383
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
384
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
385
|
+
};
|
|
386
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
387
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
388
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
389
|
+
});
|
|
390
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
391
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
392
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
393
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
394
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
395
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
396
|
+
} else {
|
|
397
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
398
|
+
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
399
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
400
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
401
|
+
}
|
|
402
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
403
|
+
}
|
|
215
404
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
216
405
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
217
406
|
if (!partOfCommittee && !this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
@@ -219,26 +408,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
219
408
|
return undefined;
|
|
220
409
|
}
|
|
221
410
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
222
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} proposal for slot ${
|
|
411
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
223
412
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
224
413
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
225
414
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
226
415
|
});
|
|
227
416
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
228
|
-
//
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
230
|
-
|
|
231
|
-
|
|
232
|
-
|
|
233
|
-
|
|
234
|
-
|
|
235
|
-
|
|
236
|
-
|
|
237
|
-
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs from re-execution`, err);
|
|
238
|
-
}
|
|
239
|
-
});
|
|
417
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
418
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
419
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
420
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
421
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
422
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
423
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
424
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
425
|
+
}
|
|
240
426
|
}
|
|
241
|
-
// If the above function does not throw an error, then we can attest to the proposal
|
|
242
427
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
243
428
|
let attestors;
|
|
244
429
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -255,13 +440,66 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
255
440
|
}
|
|
256
441
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
257
442
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
258
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating attestations for
|
|
443
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
259
444
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
260
445
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
261
446
|
});
|
|
262
447
|
return undefined;
|
|
263
448
|
}
|
|
264
|
-
return this.
|
|
449
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
450
|
+
}
|
|
451
|
+
/**
|
|
452
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
453
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
454
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
455
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
456
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
457
|
+
return true;
|
|
458
|
+
}
|
|
459
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
460
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
461
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
462
|
+
return false;
|
|
463
|
+
}
|
|
464
|
+
return true;
|
|
465
|
+
}
|
|
466
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
467
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
468
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
469
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
470
|
+
}
|
|
471
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
472
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
473
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
474
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
475
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
476
|
+
}
|
|
477
|
+
/**
|
|
478
|
+
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
479
|
+
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
480
|
+
try {
|
|
481
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
482
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
483
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
484
|
+
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
485
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
486
|
+
return;
|
|
487
|
+
}
|
|
488
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
489
|
+
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
490
|
+
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
491
|
+
return;
|
|
492
|
+
}
|
|
493
|
+
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
494
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
495
|
+
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
496
|
+
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
497
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
498
|
+
numBlobs: blobs.length
|
|
499
|
+
});
|
|
500
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
501
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs for checkpoint: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
502
|
+
}
|
|
265
503
|
}
|
|
266
504
|
slashInvalidBlock(proposal) {
|
|
267
505
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
@@ -270,11 +508,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
270
508
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
271
509
|
return;
|
|
272
510
|
}
|
|
273
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
274
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
275
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
276
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
277
|
-
}
|
|
278
511
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
279
512
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
280
513
|
{
|
|
@@ -285,77 +518,215 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
285
518
|
}
|
|
286
519
|
]);
|
|
287
520
|
}
|
|
288
|
-
|
|
289
|
-
|
|
290
|
-
|
|
291
|
-
|
|
292
|
-
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
294
|
-
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
296
|
-
|
|
521
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
522
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
523
|
+
return;
|
|
524
|
+
}
|
|
525
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
526
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
527
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
528
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
529
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
530
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
531
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
532
|
+
});
|
|
533
|
+
}
|
|
534
|
+
}
|
|
535
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
536
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
537
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
538
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
539
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
540
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
541
|
+
});
|
|
542
|
+
return false;
|
|
543
|
+
}
|
|
544
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
545
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
546
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
547
|
+
return false;
|
|
548
|
+
}
|
|
549
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
550
|
+
{
|
|
551
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
552
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
553
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
554
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
555
|
+
}
|
|
556
|
+
]);
|
|
557
|
+
return true;
|
|
558
|
+
}
|
|
559
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
560
|
+
this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.add(slotNumber);
|
|
561
|
+
}
|
|
562
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
563
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
564
|
+
if (!this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber) || this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
565
|
+
return;
|
|
566
|
+
}
|
|
567
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
568
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
569
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
570
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
571
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
572
|
+
});
|
|
573
|
+
return;
|
|
574
|
+
}
|
|
575
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
576
|
+
}
|
|
577
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
578
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
579
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
580
|
+
return;
|
|
581
|
+
}
|
|
582
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
583
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
584
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
585
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
586
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
587
|
+
});
|
|
588
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
589
|
+
{
|
|
590
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
591
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
592
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
593
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
594
|
+
}
|
|
595
|
+
]);
|
|
596
|
+
}
|
|
597
|
+
/**
|
|
598
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
599
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
600
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
601
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
602
|
+
this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.add(slot);
|
|
603
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
604
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
605
|
+
slot,
|
|
606
|
+
type,
|
|
607
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
608
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
609
|
+
});
|
|
610
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
611
|
+
{
|
|
612
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
613
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
614
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
615
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
616
|
+
}
|
|
617
|
+
]);
|
|
618
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
619
|
+
{
|
|
620
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
621
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
622
|
+
}
|
|
623
|
+
]);
|
|
624
|
+
}
|
|
625
|
+
/**
|
|
626
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
627
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
628
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
629
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
630
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
631
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
632
|
+
slot,
|
|
633
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
634
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
635
|
+
});
|
|
636
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
637
|
+
{
|
|
638
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
639
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
640
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
641
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
642
|
+
}
|
|
643
|
+
]);
|
|
644
|
+
}
|
|
645
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
646
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
647
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
648
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
649
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
650
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
651
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
652
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
653
|
+
}
|
|
654
|
+
}
|
|
655
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
656
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
297
657
|
...options,
|
|
298
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
658
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
299
659
|
});
|
|
300
|
-
this.
|
|
660
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
301
661
|
return newProposal;
|
|
302
662
|
}
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
|
|
305
|
-
this.
|
|
306
|
-
|
|
663
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
664
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
665
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
666
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
667
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
668
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
669
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
670
|
+
}
|
|
671
|
+
}
|
|
672
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
673
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
674
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
675
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
676
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
677
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
678
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
679
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
680
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
681
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
682
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
307
683
|
}
|
|
308
684
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
309
685
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
310
686
|
}
|
|
311
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer) {
|
|
312
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer);
|
|
687
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
688
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
313
689
|
}
|
|
314
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
315
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
690
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
691
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
316
692
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
317
693
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
318
694
|
inCommittee
|
|
319
695
|
});
|
|
320
|
-
const attestations = await this.
|
|
696
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
697
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
698
|
+
return [];
|
|
699
|
+
}
|
|
321
700
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
322
701
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
323
702
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
324
|
-
void this.p2pClient.
|
|
703
|
+
void this.p2pClient.broadcastCheckpointAttestations(attestations).catch((err)=>{
|
|
325
704
|
this.log.error(`Failed to broadcast self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, err);
|
|
326
705
|
});
|
|
327
706
|
return attestations;
|
|
328
707
|
}
|
|
329
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
330
|
-
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this
|
|
331
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
708
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
709
|
+
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
710
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
332
711
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
333
712
|
if (+deadline < this.dateProvider.now()) {
|
|
334
713
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
335
714
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
336
715
|
}
|
|
337
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
338
|
-
const
|
|
716
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
717
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
339
718
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
340
719
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
341
720
|
while(true){
|
|
342
|
-
//
|
|
343
|
-
//
|
|
344
|
-
|
|
345
|
-
|
|
346
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched payload from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
347
|
-
attestationPayload: attestation.payload,
|
|
348
|
-
proposalPayload: proposal.payload
|
|
349
|
-
});
|
|
350
|
-
return false;
|
|
351
|
-
}
|
|
352
|
-
return true;
|
|
353
|
-
});
|
|
721
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
722
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
723
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
724
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
354
725
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
355
726
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
356
727
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
357
728
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
358
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
729
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
359
730
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
360
731
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
361
732
|
continue;
|
|
@@ -377,11 +748,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
377
748
|
await sleep(this.config.attestationPollingIntervalMs);
|
|
378
749
|
}
|
|
379
750
|
}
|
|
380
|
-
async createBlockAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
381
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
382
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addAttestations(attestations);
|
|
383
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
384
|
-
}
|
|
385
751
|
async handleAuthRequest(peer, msg) {
|
|
386
752
|
const authRequest = AuthRequest.fromBuffer(msg);
|
|
387
753
|
const statusMessage = await this.p2pClient.handleAuthRequestFromPeer(authRequest, peer).catch((_)=>undefined);
|
|
@@ -396,7 +762,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
396
762
|
return Buffer.alloc(0);
|
|
397
763
|
}
|
|
398
764
|
const payloadToSign = authRequest.getPayloadToSign();
|
|
399
|
-
|
|
765
|
+
// AUTH_REQUEST doesn't require HA protection - multiple signatures are safe
|
|
766
|
+
const context = {
|
|
767
|
+
dutyType: DutyType.AUTH_REQUEST
|
|
768
|
+
};
|
|
769
|
+
const signature = await this.keyStore.signMessageWithAddress(addressToUse, payloadToSign, context);
|
|
400
770
|
const authResponse = new AuthResponse(statusMessage, signature);
|
|
401
771
|
return authResponse.toBuffer();
|
|
402
772
|
}
|