@asmlift/core 0.5.0 → 0.6.0

package/src/raise/shortcircuit.ts

@@ -36,14 +36,45 @@
 // folds bottom-up: the innermost diamond becomes a bare condition, which the next diamond consumes as its
 // Vb, and so on. SCOPE: the shared-arm must be reachable as a single-predecessor `br` feeder; the `||`
 // form where the const-1 "true" block has TWO predecessors (`return a || b`) is not folded.
-// Guards stay conservative: the CONST is exactly 0/1, Vb is a bool op or 0/1 const, the head condition is a
-// negatable icmp, and any deviation falls through untouched (a miss, never a miscompile).
-import { Block, Fn, Op, Value, defOpMap, mkOp, mkValue, predecessors, replaceAllUsesWith } from '../ir/core';
+// Guards stay conservative: the CONST is exactly 0/1, Vb is a bool op or 0/1 const, and the head condition
+// is NEGATABLE whenever the orientation inverts it — an icmp by opcode swap or a `logic_and`/`logic_or` by
+// De Morgan, both via `negateCondOps`, which the control-flow form below shares. Any deviation falls
+// through untouched (a miss, never a miscompile).
+import {
+  Block,
+  Fn,
+  Op,
+  Successor,
+  Value,
+  defOpMap,
+  foldWriteOrder,
+  forwardingTarget,
+  mkOp,
+  mkValue,
+  predecessors,
+  reachableBlocks,
+  replaceAllUsesWith,
+} from '../ir/core';
 import { HOIST_UNSAFE_OPS, NEGATED_ICMP } from '../ir/opcodes';
 import { T } from '../ir/types';
 
 const BOOL_OPS = new Set([...Object.keys(NEGATED_ICMP), 'logic_and', 'logic_or']);
 
+/** Run `step` until it stops rewriting, and answer whether it ever did.
+ *
+ *  Both folds in this file are driven the same way and have to be: `defOpMap` and `predecessors`
+ *  are stale the moment a block is spliced or dropped, so a scan performs at most ONE rewrite and
+ *  then starts over. `step` is that scan — it recomputes everything it reads, does at most one
+ *  rewrite, and returns whether it did — which makes the rescan point a function boundary instead
+ *  of a `break` to a label. */
+function untilFixpoint(step: () => boolean): boolean {
+  let changed = false;
+  while (step()) {
+    changed = true;
+  }
+  return changed;
+}
+
 /** Fold `(-x | x) >> 31` (logical shift) → `x != 0`, in place. agbcc's branchless is-nonzero idiom. */
 // NOT exported: it must run before the diamond fold, an ordering only recognizeShortCircuit's
 // internal call preserves.
@@ -86,7 +117,6 @@ function recognizeBoolNormalize(fn: Fn): boolean {
 
 /** Collapse a simple boolean short-circuit diamond into one `logic_and`/`logic_or`, in place. */
 export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
-  let changed = recognizeBoolNormalize(fn);
   const term = (b: Block) => b.ops[b.ops.length - 1];
   const constOf = (defs: Map<Value, Op>, v: Value): number | null => {
     const d = defs.get(v);
@@ -97,12 +127,15 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
     return !!d && BOOL_OPS.has(d.opcode);
   };
 
-  let progress = true;
-  while (progress) {
-    progress = false;
+  // TWO STATEMENTS, not `recognizeBoolNormalize(fn) || untilFixpoint(…)`: the normalisation must
+  // run BEFORE the fold (it is what turns agbcc's branchless is-nonzero into the `icmp_ne` the
+  // diamond's second operand has to be), and `||` would skip the fold whenever it reported a
+  // change. Both results are returned, because either one is a change to the IR.
+  const normalized = recognizeBoolNormalize(fn);
+  const folded = untilFixpoint(() => {
     const defs = defOpMap(fn);
     const preds = predecessors(fn);
-    outer: for (const m of fn.blocks) {
+    for (const m of fn.blocks) {
       if (m.params.length !== 1) {
         continue;
       }
@@ -124,9 +157,8 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
         // below: `predecessors()` walks successor edges only, so an entry block that is also a loop
         // header shows one predecessor while actually running BEFORE it on the first iteration.
         // Hoisting its body then reorders it and deleting it moves `fn.blocks[0]`. Silent — verify,
-        // assertResolved and assertDerefsTyped all pass. PRE-EXISTING (this fold predates the branch
-        // form and `main` miscompiles the same MIPS input); fixed here because the branch form's
-        // note used to assert this one was safe.
+        // assertResolved and assertDerefsTyped all pass. Pinned by 'a feeder that is the entry block
+        // is not folded away'; the branch form has the same refusal and its own test.
         if (bfeed === fn.blocks[0]) {
           continue;
         }
@@ -162,10 +194,24 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
           continue;
         }
         const cond = ht.operands[0];
-        const condDef = defs.get(cond);
-        if (!condDef || !NEGATED_ICMP[condDef.opcode]) {
+        // The head condition must be a C BOOLEAN computed here — a negatable comparison or a
+        // `logic_and`/`logic_or`, which is exactly `BOOL_OPS` and exactly the set `negateCondOps`
+        // accepts at top level, so a fused connective head still folds. Mere def-existence is NOT
+        // the test — `call` declares `results: 1` (ir/opcodes.ts), so `defOpMap` maps a call result
+        // like any other — because the const/const reduction below hands `cond` ITSELF on as the
+        // merge value (`res = condSide`), replacing a phi that was `cond ? 1 : 0`. A non-boolean
+        // head there is a silent WRONG VALUE, not a missed fold: `and(6, 3)` emitted where the
+        // program yields 1. The branch form carries no such obligation — its result only ever feeds
+        // a `cond_br`, which reads truthiness — which is why this gate lives here and not in the
+        // shared helper, whose own result is boolean by construction and so covers the negated case.
+        //
+        // Instrumented over the whole benchmark under BOTH lift configurations, it refuses
+        // NOTHING — every head reaching it is a negatable icmp — while the pass folds 6 value-form
+        // diamonds per configuration, 3 of them through the const/const reduction. An invariant's
+        // guard, not a filter any row depends on.
+        if (!isBool(defs, cond)) {
           continue;
-        } // head condition must be a negatable icmp
+        }
 
         // The `cond`-side operand is negated iff `cond` guards the short-circuit (taken+0 / fall+1).
         const wantNeg = (c === 0 && mIsTaken) || (c === 1 && mIsFall);
@@ -180,11 +226,26 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
         if (bfeed.ops.slice(0, -1).some((op) => HOIST_UNSAFE_OPS.has(op.opcode))) {
           continue;
         }
+        // NEGATABLE only when the orientation actually inverts the head — asked here rather than up
+        // with the other head checks, so a fused `logic_and`/`logic_or` head (what the branch form
+        // below leaves behind, and what an earlier round of THIS pass leaves behind in a chain) is
+        // not refused when nothing needs inverting. `negateCondOps` is the branch form's helper too,
+        // so both siblings refuse the same three shapes. Its dominance precondition holds here for a
+        // different reason than there: `cond` is ^h's OWN terminator operand, so its whole cone
+        // dominates the point `before` splices into.
+        //
+        // Minted below every other refusal and above the first mutation: a site refused for any
+        // other reason pays nothing, and a refusal below the hoist would leave ^h half-rewritten.
+        const negation = wantNeg ? negateCondOps(defs, cond, NEGATE_BUDGET) : null;
+        if (wantNeg && !negation) {
+          continue;
+        }
         bfeed.ops.slice(0, -1).forEach(before); // hoist B's pure body (defines Vb; harmless if a dead const)
+        foldWriteOrder(fn.writeOrder, bfeed, h); // …and its writes now follow H's (ir/core.ts)
         let condSide = cond;
-        if (wantNeg) {
-          condSide = mkValue(T.unk(32));
-          before(mkOp(NEGATED_ICMP[condDef.opcode], { operands: [...condDef.operands], results: [condSide] }));
+        if (negation) {
+          negation.ops.forEach((op) => before(op));
+          condSide = negation.result;
         }
         // Vb const → the phi reduces to the (possibly negated) condition; Vb bool → a && / || connective.
         let res = condSide;
@@ -203,13 +264,12 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
           m.params = [];
         }
         fn.blocks = fn.blocks.filter((x) => x !== bfeed);
-        changed = true;
-        progress = true;
-        break outer; // defs/preds are stale after mutation — recompute on the next iteration
+        return true; // defs/preds are stale after mutation — the driver rescans
       }
     }
-  }
-  return changed;
+    return false;
+  });
+  return normalized || folded;
 }
 
 // ── the CONTROL-FLOW form ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -253,10 +313,51 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
 //     not a hand-written `||`. switch-recover.ts requires every test's `cond_br` operand to be an
 //     `icmp` (its `isCmpOpcode` gate), and a `logic_or` is not one, so folding first PERMANENTLY
 //     disqualifies the recovery and a clean `switch (x) { case 1: case 2: … }` degrades to a chain
-//     of nested `if`s. The switch is the better recovery and it is the more specific one, so it
-//     wins the shape. Cost: a genuine source-level `x == 1 || x == 2` that is NOT part of a wider
-//     tree also declines — the same conservative trade loops.ts makes when it refuses to infer a
-//     header from `cond_br` shape.
+//     of nested `if`s. The two spellings are mutually exclusive within one raise and BOTH are
+//     legitimate C, and which of them the asm rules out depends on the shape: `x == 0 || x == 2`
+//     and `switch (x) { case 0: case 2: }` are ONE object only where the switch has a single case
+//     group plus `default:` (agbcc 12 instructions each, one md5; IDO 64 bytes each, one md5), and
+//     part as soon as there is a second group to balance a dispatch against (agbcc 20 against 16,
+//     IDO 80 bytes and different bytes). So this is a DEFAULT rather than a decision: the switch
+//     is the more specific recovery and wins the shape here, while
+//     `foldTreeOwned` spells the connective instead and the differ referees (rank.ts's
+//     `/connective`). ONLY THIS CLAUSE. Its notion of "same scrutinee" is switch-recover.ts's own
+//     PRE1 — a NECESSARY condition for recovery, never a sufficient one, so what it refuses is
+//     "a switch could not be ruled out here" and it is a proxy too, just a far tighter one than
+//     the relayed clause. Priced over the set it REFUSES rather than the set it admits: it fires on
+//     6 rows, protects 2 (`pokeemerald:IsStringLengthAtLeast`,
+//     `pokeemerald:TrySetCantSelectMoveBattleScript`), and on the other 4 the published winner
+//     folds THROUGH it — `kleod:CheckWorldCompletion`'s refused site is `v5 == 3 || v5 == 5` on an
+//     ordinary inner-loop counter with no dispatch region near it. It is the axis, not the clause,
+//     that keeps those 4. A structural discriminator is L1-visible and would be strictly better —
+//     is the shared block the entry of a region with dispatch-shaped in-edges, is the scrutinee
+//     defined by the enclosing loop header — and is UNBUILT.
+//     The relayed clause below is a different statement (see its own note: a blunt proxy that
+//     fires on an ordinary loop counter), it has NO inhabitant anywhere in the benchmark, and a
+//     candidate born there would carry a `/connective` label for a fold that answers
+//     no connective-vs-tree question. It stays absolute.
+//   - the shared block was reached through a RELAY, and either test's scrutinee is compared against
+//     constants more than once in the function. This one is ABSOLUTE — `foldTreeOwned` does not
+//     widen it. Same reason as the bullet above, widened because the reach is: a relay is what
+//     agbcc puts on a tree's default edge, so resolving one walks this fold into a dispatch chain,
+//     where the sibling that gives the tree away may be neither test in
+//     hand — the split node is RELATIONAL and only its children are equalities, which is precisely
+//     what the pairwise test cannot see. Without it `sub_807BD88` and `sub_808491C` each lose a
+//     `switch` (sa3).
+//
+//     It is BLUNT, and that is why it is held to the relayed case. The count does not distinguish a
+//     dispatch chain from any variable tested against constants at two sites: on `sub_8080AD4` it
+//     fires on `v2 > 2` and `v2 != 2` — one ordinary loop counter — and refusing there costs the
+//     function its whole decompilation, because the only fold it has is the `do…while` exit. Its
+//     notion of "same scrutinee" is SSA-value identity, which is switch-recover.ts's own PRE1, so it
+//     cannot refuse a tree that recovery could not have taken either — but it is a proxy for "am I
+//     inside a dispatch chain", not a test of it. A direct edge onto a relational split node still
+//     escapes: `sub_807F334` folds `x > 1 && x == 2` and loses a `switch` on main and here alike.
+//   - BOTH of ^g's edges rejoin the shared block, with NEITHER of them landing on it directly. Then
+//     there is no "other" arm and nothing decides which side the connective guards. Only resolution
+//     creates this — an edge that arrives directly is preferred exactly so the MIPS divide-guard
+//     idiom, whose emptied trap block forwards to the same place, keeps folding as it always has
+//     (`af:adds:ido7.1` and the `divv`/`gcd`/`modv` rows).
 //   - ^g holds a side effect — its ops move into ^h, which runs UNCONDITIONALLY. A store in `b`
 //     would then execute even when `a` already decided the branch. (`a || (*p = 1)`.)
 //   - a value defined in ^g is used outside ^g, or used more than once. Then the structurer
@@ -267,21 +368,133 @@ export function recognizeShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
 //   - the two edges into the shared block carry DIFFERENT args. Only one edge survives the fold,
 //     so it can only carry one argument list; picking either would silently drop the other path's
 //     phi input.
-//   - ^g's two successors are the same block, or ^g's condition is not a negatable icmp when the
-//     orientation needs negating.
+//   - ^g's two successors are the same block, or ^g's condition cannot be NEGATED when the
+//     orientation needs negating. `negateCondOps` decides that, over two shapes: a negatable
+//     `icmp_*` (the swapped opcode) and a `logic_and`/`logic_or` (De Morgan — the dual connective
+//     over recursively negated operands). The connective case is what lets a chain fold past its
+//     FIRST level: this pass is iterative, so by the time it tries an outer diamond the inner one is
+//     already fused and ^g's condition is a connective, which `NEGATED_ICMP` — a table over
+//     comparison opcodes — has no entry for. Refuse it and `a || !(b || c)` stops after one level at
+//     all 13 sites this fires on (`synthetic:llcmp:agbcc`, `:gcc2.7.2kmc`, and 11 real agbcc
+//     functions in klonoa+sa3); on the two benchmark rows the structurer then tail-duplicates the
+//     shared return into both arms. The helper's own refusals — no def, a non-negatable leaf
+//     ANYWHERE in the cone (no partial De Morgan), a cone over the node budget — are on the helper.
+//
+//     De Morgan DUPLICATES leaf comparisons, so a duplicated leaf could gain a second consumer that
+//     analysis.ts renders as a statement BEFORE the `if` — the hazard the single-icmp negation
+//     always carried. Measured over those 11 BRANCH-form sites: NO site gains a local (one,
+//     `sub_80B7CD0`, loses one, 8 → 7) and every site that already decompiled gets SHORTER. Two
+//     (`sub_80930B8`, `sub_80932E0`) go from DECLINED to a full decompilation — folding a loop-exit
+//     connective removes the back-edge loop recovery was refusing — so they get LONGER (1 → 112 and
+//     1 → 55 lines) and are the only sites whose local count rises at all, 0 → 22 and 0 → 7. A
+//     decompilation appearing, not a leaf escaping.
+//
+//     That number is SCOPED to this fold and does not carry to the value form, which shares the
+//     helper but no use-count condition: `definedValuesStayLocal` (bottom of this file)
+//     independently forbids a ^g-defined value with a second consumer HERE, while the value form
+//     relies on the original cone dying to the pass list's own `dce: true`. There is nothing to
+//     transfer the number to yet either — instrumenting the value form over the whole benchmark
+//     under both lift configurations counts 6 folds per configuration, every head a single icmp.
+//
+//     The `/connective` LIFT AXIS is a separate question from the default lift, and is unwidened:
+//     `onTreeOwned` below is what tells rank.ts the axis exists for a row, and this check sits ABOVE
+//     it. Over the whole benchmark under BOTH configurations rank.ts lifts with (`foldTreeOwned`
+//     false and true), against the same rows with the connective case ablated: the recovered IR
+//     moves on the same 2 rows under each, `onTreeOwned` fires on the same rows either way, and
+//     nothing new throws.
 //
 // Every refusal falls through untouched, leaving the tail-duplicated spelling — a miss, never a
 // miscompile. Applied ITERATIVELY, so `a || b || c` folds left-to-right, each round consuming one
 // more condition block.
-export function recognizeBranchShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
-  let changed = false;
+//
+// WHICH SPELLING, and why the fold alone does not decide it. `if (a && b) X else Y` and its dual
+// `if (!a || !b) Y else X` are the same program and NOT the same bytes — agbcc lays the arms out in
+// source order, so which was written is recorded in the branch senses. This rewrite keeps ^h's
+// unchanged successor slot, so the connective comes out in the orientation those senses spell, and
+// which of the two that is depends on the branch RANGE below, not on the source. Reaching the
+// other is `negateCond`'s job (l3/ast.ts distributes `!(a && b)`), and rank.ts's `/flip-join` axis
+// is what asks for it on a RECONVERGING if — the default spells the layout reading and the axis
+// spells its dual, so both orientations are compiled and the differ picks (synthetic:ifand_near
+// matches at the default, synthetic:ifor_near on the axis).
+//
+// What neither reaches is the MIXED spelling. `negateJoinedBranchSense` is a per-FUNCTION boolean,
+// so the axis negates every joined `if` at once — and of the 28 real rows carrying the
+// `short-circuit` tag, 16 hold two or more TWO-ARMED ifs (counted by `else`, which is what the
+// axis's own `thenS.length && elseS.length` gate needs) and 12 hold two or more conditions
+// carrying a connective. TWO-ARMED is the count that matters: both sense booleans exclude a
+// one-armed `if` by construction, so a tally of `if (` of any kind is the wrong denominator.
+// A per-SITE negation is the open lever; a gate on whether to ENUMERATE the axis does not reach
+// it, and removes a spelling the differ would referee.
+//
+// The De Morgan negation below forecloses a third spelling, at a measured price: it DISTRIBUTES, so
+// the leaves come out negated (`a || (!b && !c)`) and `a || !(b || c)` has no
+// candidate — the IR has no `logic_not` to build one from (ir/opcodes.ts). Compiled both ways on
+// the `a || (b && c)` guard shape at agbcc's default flags, the two source spellings assemble to
+// the same bytes (12/12 rows, score 0), so the foreclosure costs nothing here. A shape that ever
+// separated them would be a new axis, not a bug in this fold.
+//
+// WHICH slot ^g lands in is decided by the asm's branch POLARITY, and on Thumb the branch RANGE
+// decides the polarity — so the same source `&&` reaches this pass two different ways:
+//
+//   short branch   `beq shared`         ^g is ^h's FALL  → logic_or
+//   long branch    `bne ^g / b shared`  ^g is ^h's TAKEN → logic_and
+//
+// agbcc inverts a conditional it cannot reach, so past ±256 bytes it emits the second form, and the
+// trampoline it leaves on the `b` sits on the edge into the SHARED block — which `forwardingTarget`
+// (ir/core.ts) looks through. Only that edge needs it: the INVERTED branch is the one that still
+// reaches, so `bne ^g` always arrives at ^g directly and no relay can sit between them.
+//
+// SO THE CONNECTIVE THIS FOLD MINTS IS THE RANGE'S, NEVER THE SOURCE'S: both `synthetic:ifand_near`
+// (source `&&`) and `synthetic:ifor_near` (source `||`) are short-branch rows and both come out
+// `logic_or`. Which SPELLING then wins is the joined-sense default's question, one layer up, and
+// BOTH halves have a dual candidate there — `ifand_near:agbcc` matches at the default (`unsigned`),
+// while `ifor_near:agbcc` and the long-branch `ifand_far:agbcc` each match on `/flip-join`.
+//
+// `gIsFall` IS NOT THE CARRIER FOR A PER-SITE SENSE, and that was measured rather than argued. It
+// reads the branch RANGE, exactly as the table above says — so in any function small enough for
+// every branch to be short it is the SAME at every site, including sites whose sources wrote
+// opposite connectives. Instrumented at the fold and run through the bench: a two-site row whose
+// first site wrote `&&` and whose second wrote its dual reads `gIsFall=true` at BOTH
+// (`synthetic:joinsense`), and a four-site ladder row with two sites inverted in the source reads
+// `true` at all four (`synthetic:mixsense`). The positive control reads the other way —
+// `synthetic:ifand_far`, the long-branch row, gives `false` against
+// `synthetic:ifand_near`'s `true`. So carrying this boolean to L3
+// as a node stamp (the `#144` `Expr.baseOrdered` shape) would hand every site of such a function
+// one answer and reach exactly the two configurations `negateJoinedBranchSense` already reaches.
+//
+// Every refusal falls through untouched — a miss, never a miscompile.
+/** Per-call options for `recognizeBranchShortCircuit` — the tree-ownership refusal's two ends. */
+export interface BranchShortCircuitOptions {
+  /** Take the fold at a site the PAIRWISE comparison-tree refusal owns, spelling the connective
+   *  where the default leaves the tree for switch-recover.ts. rank.ts's `/connective` axis; see the
+   *  REFUSALS note. It widens the SHAPE the fold accepts and nothing about what the fold may move —
+   *  every other refusal still applies, the RELAYED clause included.
+   *
+   *  A NEW REFUSAL CONDITION, stated because it is one: this is per-FUNCTION and the question is
+   *  per-SITE. Every tree-owned site in a function flips together, so a function with two of them
+   *  wanting OPPOSITE spellings has no candidate that spells the mix, and nothing reports the gap.
+   *  A per-FUNCTION predicate cannot decide a per-SITE question — the same shape the joined-if
+   *  default hit — and here it costs completeness rather than correctness. The alternative is a
+   *  fork per site: `kleod:CheckWorldCompletion` refuses at 10 and goes 96 → 192 candidates as one
+   *  boolean, where a per-site fork would be 1024×. That is why the boolean, not an oversight. */
+  foldTreeOwned?: boolean;
+  /** Called at each site the pairwise tree-ownership refusal is the ONE thing stopping the fold —
+   *  how rank.ts learns the axis has an inhabitant here without re-running the matcher. Asked LAST,
+   *  after `sameArgs` and the negatability check, so a report means a `/connective` candidate that
+   *  differs from its sibling: reporting a refusal merely REACHED would double the row's whole
+   *  candidate cross for a lift that produces duplicates the dedup collapses. (Its sibling gate
+   *  `hasSetupArgsNarrowing` asks the same question the same way — does the lever CHANGE anything.)
+   *  The pass re-scans after every rewrite, so one site can report more than once; read it as a
+   *  boolean. */
+  onTreeOwned?: () => void;
+}
+
+export function recognizeBranchShortCircuit(fn: Fn, opts: BranchShortCircuitOptions = {}): boolean {
   const term = (b: Block) => b.ops[b.ops.length - 1];
-  let progress = true;
-  while (progress) {
-    progress = false;
+  return untilFixpoint(() => {
     const defs = defOpMap(fn);
     const preds = predecessors(fn);
-    outer: for (const h of fn.blocks) {
+    for (const h of fn.blocks) {
       const ht = term(h);
       if (ht.opcode !== 'cond_br') {
         continue;
@@ -312,10 +525,6 @@ export function recognizeBranchShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
         if (gTaken.block === gFall.block) {
           continue;
         }
-        // A comparison TREE over one scrutinee belongs to switch recovery, not to this fold.
-        if (sameScrutineeConstTests(defs, ht.operands[0], gt.operands[0])) {
-          continue;
-        }
         // ^g's body must be pure, and every value it defines must be consumed only by ^g itself —
         // see the REFUSALS note: an escaping or reused value becomes a statement hoisted out of the
         // short circuit.
@@ -329,12 +538,32 @@ export function recognizeBranchShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
         if (!definedValuesStayLocal(fn, g)) {
           continue;
         }
-        // Which of ^g's edges rejoins ^h's other successor? That is the shared block.
-        const sharedEdge =
-          gTaken.block === sharedFromH.block ? gTaken : gFall.block === sharedFromH.block ? gFall : null;
+        // Which of ^g's edges rejoins ^h's other successor? That is the shared block. A DIRECT edge
+        // wins, so resolution only ever adds reach — it never re-picks an edge this fold already had.
+        const sharedTarget = forwardingTarget(sharedFromH.block);
+        const rejoins = (e: Successor): boolean => forwardingTarget(e.block) === sharedTarget;
+        const direct = gTaken.block === sharedFromH.block ? gTaken : gFall.block === sharedFromH.block ? gFall : null;
+        // With neither edge direct, both may resolve onto the shared block — and then there is no
+        // "other" arm left and nothing decides which side the connective guards.
+        if (direct === null && rejoins(gTaken) && rejoins(gFall)) {
+          continue;
+        }
+        const sharedEdge = direct ?? (rejoins(gTaken) ? gTaken : rejoins(gFall) ? gFall : null);
         if (!sharedEdge) {
           continue;
         }
+        // A comparison TREE over one scrutinee belongs to switch recovery, not to this fold. A relay
+        // is what agbcc puts on a tree's default edge, so a shared block reached through one is
+        // searched function-wide; a direct edge keeps the pairwise test. See the REFUSALS note —
+        // the wider test is blunt, and that is why it is not asked everywhere.
+        const throughRelay = sharedEdge.block !== sharedFromH.block;
+        if (
+          throughRelay &&
+          (inComparisonTree(fn, defs, ht.operands[0]) || inComparisonTree(fn, defs, gt.operands[0]))
+        ) {
+          continue; // the relayed clause is absolute — `foldTreeOwned` does not widen it
+        }
+        const treeOwned = !throughRelay && sameScrutineeConstTests(defs, ht.operands[0], gt.operands[0]);
         const otherEdge = sharedEdge === gTaken ? gFall : gTaken;
         if (!sameArgs(sharedFromH.args, sharedEdge.args)) {
           continue;
@@ -343,16 +572,27 @@ export function recognizeBranchShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
         // reach the SHARED block", `logic_and` asks "does ^g reach the OTHER block".
         const wantEdge = gIsFall ? sharedEdge : otherEdge;
         const c2 = gt.operands[0];
-        const c2Def = defs.get(c2);
-        let second = c2;
-        const negated: Op[] = [];
-        if (wantEdge !== gTaken) {
-          if (!c2Def || !NEGATED_ICMP[c2Def.opcode]) {
+        // ^g's condition may itself be a CONNECTIVE — the fold is iterative, so an inner diamond is
+        // already fused by the time the outer one is tried, and negating one is De Morgan rather
+        // than an opcode swap. `negateCondOps` does both, and returns null on anything else.
+        const negation = wantEdge !== gTaken ? negateCondOps(defs, c2, NEGATE_BUDGET) : null;
+        if (wantEdge !== gTaken && !negation) {
+          continue;
+        }
+        // LAST refusal, so `onTreeOwned` reports a site where tree ownership is the ONE thing in the
+        // way — which is why the negatability check stays above it even though it MINTS the negated
+        // cone (up to NEGATE_BUDGET ops) and discards it whenever this gate refuses. That discard is
+        // free rather than merely cheap: `mkValue` is `{ type }` with no identity counter
+        // (ir/core.ts) and nothing is spliced until below, so a site refused here leaves the CFG
+        // byte-identical. See the option's doc for why the position is the gate's meaning.
+        if (treeOwned) {
+          opts.onTreeOwned?.();
+          if (!opts.foldTreeOwned) {
             continue;
           }
-          second = mkValue(T.unk(32));
-          negated.push(mkOp(NEGATED_ICMP[c2Def.opcode], { operands: [...c2Def.operands], results: [second] }));
         }
+        const second = negation ? negation.result : c2;
+        const negated: Op[] = negation ? negation.ops : [];
         const res = mkValue(T.unk(32));
         const connective = mkOp(gIsFall ? 'logic_or' : 'logic_and', {
           operands: [ht.operands[0], second],
@@ -372,35 +612,195 @@ export function recognizeBranchShortCircuit(fn: Fn): boolean {
                 { block: sharedEdge.block, args: [...sharedEdge.args] },
               ],
         });
+        foldWriteOrder(fn.writeOrder, g, h); // ^g's writes now follow ^h's own (ir/core.ts)
         fn.blocks = fn.blocks.filter((x) => x !== g);
-        changed = true;
-        progress = true;
-        break outer; // defs/preds are stale after the mutation — recompute on the next round
+        // ^h's old shared edge is gone, so the relay it pointed at may have become unreachable —
+        // and once that link goes, so may the next, all the way down the chain. `dominators`
+        // (ir/core.ts) gives a block with no in-edges only ITSELF, which empties the intersection at
+        // everything it still branches to, so a half-dropped chain declines two passes later with a
+        // def-does-not-dominate-use out of `verify`.
+        //
+        // REACHABILITY, not predecessor count: in-edges from blocks that are themselves unreachable
+        // leave a block just as orphaned, and the thumb frontend does hand over unreachable blocks
+        // (see raise/gvn.ts). Only relays are dropped — the chain ends at the first block that does
+        // real work, and that one stays whatever its in-edges look like.
+        //
+        // The relay test below is `isBodyless` (ir/core.ts) MINUS its parameter clause, and the
+        // omission is what the reachability guard above buys: an unreachable block binds nothing, so
+        // a param on one says nothing about a live edge, while refusing it would leave the chain
+        // HALF-DROPPED — and a half-dropped chain fails `verify` two passes later with a
+        // def-does-not-dominate-use. `isBodyless` itself is unchanged and right for its own three
+        // callers, every one of which asks about a block that is still reached.
+        for (let link = sharedFromH.block; link.ops.length === 1 && link.ops[0].opcode === 'br';) {
+          const dead = link;
+          if (dead === fn.blocks[0] || reachableBlocks(fn).has(dead)) {
+            break;
+          }
+          link = dead.ops[0].successors[0].block;
+          fn.blocks = fn.blocks.filter((x) => x !== dead);
+        }
+        return true; // defs/preds are stale after the mutation — the driver rescans
       }
     }
-  }
-  return changed;
+    return false;
+  });
 }
 
-/** Do `c1` and `c2` compare the SAME value against CONSTANTS? That is the signature of a
- *  comparison-tree `switch`, which switch-recover.ts owns — see the REFUSALS note. Equality tests
- *  only: a switch tree dispatches on `==`/`!=`, while a RELATIONAL pair (`x >= lo && x <= hi`, the
- *  range check) is a genuine connective this fold should still take. */
-function sameScrutineeConstTests(defs: Map<Value, Op>, c1: Value, c2: Value): boolean {
-  const eqTest = (v: Value): { scrutinee: Value } | null => {
-    const d = defs.get(v);
-    if (!d || (d.opcode !== 'icmp_eq' && d.opcode !== 'icmp_ne')) {
+/** How many ops `negateCondOps` may KEEP for one negation. De Morgan rebuilds the cone PER PATH and
+ *  shares nothing — deliberately, see the helper's note — so a fold's cost is linear in the cone's
+ *  nodes and this is the cheap stop on it.
+ *
+ *  What 8 decides, said as the shape rather than as headroom, because "8" reads like more room than
+ *  it is. A negation mints one op per cone node and a binary expansion has leaves = internal + 1, so
+ *  a minted count is always ODD: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9. At 8 a FOUR-clause inner conjunct (7 ops) folds and
+ *  a FIVE-clause one (9 ops) does not; 7 and 8 are therefore one gate, and so is 9 over everything
+ *  measured here, the deepest cone in the 2,047 lifted klonoa+sa3 functions minting 5 (17
+ *  connective negations, 0 refused). Clause COUNT is not the axis either: a FLAT `a || b || c || …`
+ *  chain pays nothing at all, because ^g's condition is never a connective in that shape.
+ *
+ *  The bound is on ops KEPT, and the frontier is a NODE COUNT — not a shape. Pinned as such rather
+ *  than argued: branch-shortcircuit.test.ts's "the fold's frontier is the cone's NODE COUNT, not its
+ *  shape" enumerates all 23,714 binary cone shapes with up to 10 internal nodes (21 nodes) and
+ *  asserts the PUBLIC fold takes one exactly when `2k + 1 <= budget`.
+ *  Shape decides only WHICH guard refuses and how many ops had been
+ *  minted when it did, neither of them visible to a caller — at budget 8 a 15-node cone is caught by
+ *  the ENTRY guard at 9 (left chain) or 8 (balanced cone) or by the POST-check at 15 (right chain).
+ *  Because `go` pushes a parent only after its children, a refused walk transiently mints more than
+ *  the budget before unwinding — `2 * budget - 1` at the worst shape, that right chain, at every
+ *  budget measured. Bounded, and nothing escapes it.
+ *
+ *  A refusal here is SILENT, unlike the `onTreeOwned` gate above which exists so a sweep need not
+ *  re-instrument. So raising this constant is not free advice: finding a corpus site that wants it
+ *  means patching a hook back into this file. No callback is added because no consumer has asked for
+ *  one; test/branch-shortcircuit.test.ts pins both sides of the frontier instead. */
+const NEGATE_BUDGET = 8;
+
+/** The ops computing `!v`, or `null` when `v` cannot be negated.
+ *
+ *  Two cases, and no third:
+ *    - an `icmp_*` in `NEGATED_ICMP` → the swapped-opcode comparison over the SAME operands.
+ *    - a `logic_and`/`logic_or` → the DUAL connective over its two recursively negated operands.
+ *      De Morgan: `!(a || b)` is `!a && !b`. This is the only reason the helper is recursive, and
+ *      it is what lets a chain fold past its first level (`a || !(b || c)`).
+ *
+ *  REFUSALS — each returns `null`, which the caller turns into its existing `continue`, so the CFG
+ *  is left exactly as it was and the structurer emits today's tail-duplicated spelling. A bytes
+ *  miss, never a wrong answer:
+ *    - the value has no def in this function, which means a block param — a call RESULT has one,
+ *      `call` declaring `results: 1` (ir/opcodes.ts), and is refused by the next bullet instead;
+ *    - the def is neither a negatable icmp nor a connective (a call, any arithmetic) — there is no
+ *      sound inverse to build, and `!x` as `x == 0` is a DIFFERENT spelling, not this fold's
+ *      business;
+ *    - ANY leaf anywhere in the cone is non-negatable ⇒ the WHOLE negation is refused. Half a
+ *      De Morgan is not a conservative approximation of one;
+ *    - the cone exceeds `NEGATE_BUDGET` minted ops.
+ *
+ *  Ops are MINTED, never mutated: the originals stay where the caller hoisted them and die to the
+ *  pass list's own `dce: true` (raise/pre-recovery.ts). Only `icmp_*`/`logic_and`/`logic_or` are
+ *  ever rebuilt, all of them pure, so no effect can be duplicated or reordered by construction.
+ *
+ *  Nothing is SHARED between paths, and that is the point rather than a limitation. Memoizing `go`
+ *  in a `Map<Value, Value>` is three lines and would make the budget unnecessary — and it would
+ *  create exactly the hazard this fold exists to remove: a shared negated sub-condition has two
+ *  consumers, and analysis.ts renders a value with two consumers as a statement BEFORE the `if`.
+ *  Nothing collapses the duplicates later either — `numberPureValues` runs as `addrnum`, far ahead
+ *  of both folds. So the per-path rebuild is the mechanism and NEGATE_BUDGET is its price.
+ *
+ *  What it GUARANTEES about its result, which one caller leans on: every op it mints is an `icmp_*`
+ *  or a `logic_and`/`logic_or`, so the returned value is always a C boolean. The value form hands an
+ *  un-negated head straight on as the merge VALUE, which is why that caller checks booleanness for
+ *  itself before deciding whether to call here at all (see its head gate); the branch form needs no
+ *  such check, because its result only ever feeds a `cond_br`.
+ *
+ *  PRECONDITION, earned by the caller and not checked here: every value in the cone must dominate
+ *  the point the caller splices `ops` into — the minted comparisons reuse the ORIGINAL leaf
+ *  operands. The branch fold gets it free from ^g's single-predecessor gate: with ^h ^g's only
+ *  predecessor, every def in the cone either sits in ^g's body (spliced in ahead of these ops) or
+ *  dominates ^h. A caller without that invariant emits a def that does not dominate its use — loud
+ *  at `verify`, but this helper does not look.
+ *
+ *  It stays in this file rather than joining `NEGATED_ICMP` in ir/opcodes.ts: that table is a fact
+ *  about opcodes, this MINTS ops, and both consumers are the two folds above — the value form and
+ *  the branch form, which is the whole reason it is a helper and not inline. */
+function negateCondOps(defs: Map<Value, Op>, v: Value, budget: number): { ops: Op[]; result: Value } | null {
+  const ops: Op[] = [];
+  const go = (x: Value): Value | null => {
+    if (ops.length >= budget) {
+      return null;
+    }
+    const d = defs.get(x);
+    if (!d) {
       return null;
     }
-    const [x, y] = d.operands;
-    const xc = defs.get(x)?.opcode === 'const';
-    const yc = defs.get(y)?.opcode === 'const';
-    // exactly one side constant — `x == y` between two variables is no switch test
-    return xc === yc ? null : { scrutinee: xc ? y : x };
+    const out = mkValue(T.unk(32));
+    if (NEGATED_ICMP[d.opcode]) {
+      ops.push(mkOp(NEGATED_ICMP[d.opcode], { operands: [...d.operands], results: [out] }));
+      return out;
+    }
+    if (d.opcode === 'logic_and' || d.opcode === 'logic_or') {
+      const a = go(d.operands[0]);
+      if (a === null) {
+        return null;
+      }
+      const b = go(d.operands[1]);
+      if (b === null) {
+        return null;
+      }
+      // Operands are pushed BEFORE the connective, so the op list is already in dominating order.
+      ops.push(mkOp(d.opcode === 'logic_and' ? 'logic_or' : 'logic_and', { operands: [a, b], results: [out] }));
+      return out;
+    }
+    return null;
   };
-  const a = eqTest(c1);
-  const b = eqTest(c2);
-  return a !== null && b !== null && a.scrutinee === b.scrutinee;
+  const result = go(v);
+  return result === null || ops.length > budget ? null : { ops, result };
+}
+
+/** Do `c1` and `c2` compare the SAME value against CONSTANTS? The signature of a comparison-tree
+ *  `switch`, which switch-recover.ts owns — see the REFUSALS note. Equality tests only: a switch
+ *  dispatches on `==`/`!=`, while a RELATIONAL pair (`x >= lo && x <= hi`, the range check) is a
+ *  genuine connective this fold should still take. */
+function sameScrutineeConstTests(defs: Map<Value, Op>, c1: Value, c2: Value): boolean {
+  const s1 = constTestScrutinee(defs, c1);
+  const isEq = (v: Value): boolean => {
+    const op = defs.get(v)?.opcode;
+    return op === 'icmp_eq' || op === 'icmp_ne';
+  };
+  return s1 !== null && s1 === constTestScrutinee(defs, c2) && isEq(c1) && isEq(c2);
+}
+
+/** Is `c`'s scrutinee compared against constants by MORE THAN ONE `cond_br` in the function?
+ *
+ *  The function-wide question, for the case where the shared block was reached through a relay. A
+ *  tree's split node is RELATIONAL and its children are equalities (`if (x > 10) { if (x == 20) }`),
+ *  so the two tests in hand need not look alike, and the one that would give the tree away may be
+ *  neither of them. Counting every constant test on the scrutinee catches the split either way. */
+function inComparisonTree(fn: Fn, defs: Map<Value, Op>, c: Value): boolean {
+  const scrutinee = constTestScrutinee(defs, c);
+  if (scrutinee === null) {
+    return false;
+  }
+  let seen = 0;
+  for (const b of fn.blocks) {
+    const t = b.ops[b.ops.length - 1];
+    if (t?.opcode === 'cond_br' && constTestScrutinee(defs, t.operands[0]) === scrutinee && ++seen > 1) {
+      return true;
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+/** The value an `icmp_* <value>, <const>` tests, or null when `c` is not one. */
+function constTestScrutinee(defs: Map<Value, Op>, c: Value): Value | null {
+  const d = defs.get(c);
+  if (!d || NEGATED_ICMP[d.opcode] === undefined) {
+    return null;
+  }
+  const [x, y] = d.operands;
+  const xc = defs.get(x)?.opcode === 'const';
+  const yc = defs.get(y)?.opcode === 'const';
+  // exactly one side constant — `x == y` between two variables is no switch test
+  return xc === yc ? null : xc ? y : x;
 }
 
 /** True when every value `g` defines is read at most once, and any read is inside `g`.
@@ -411,11 +811,11 @@ function sameScrutineeConstTests(defs: Map<Value, Op>, c1: Value, c2: Value): bo
  *  ends in `cond_br` and its `other` successor IS ^g-dominated, so a ^g-defined value genuinely can
  *  escape, and only this check stops it.
  *
- *  An earlier version of this note justified the asymmetry by "the feeder dominates nothing but
- *  itself because M has 2+ predecessors", and told the reader not to unify the guards. That was
- *  WRONG — the entry block dominates every block whatever M's predecessor count — and it was wrong
- *  about the one guard the two folds genuinely DO share, the `fn.blocks[0]` refusal, which the value
- *  form was missing entirely. Both now have it. When changing either fold, check the other. */
+ *  What the two folds genuinely DO share is the `fn.blocks[0]` refusal, and each has a test that
+ *  pins its own half: 'a feeder that is the entry block is not folded away' for the value form, and
+ *  'the ENTRY block is never folded away' for the branch form. They are deliberately NOT routed
+ *  through one shared `isEntry` helper — a helper enforces nothing, and it is the two tests that
+ *  hold each fold to the refusal. When changing either fold, check the other. */
 function definedValuesStayLocal(fn: Fn, g: Block): boolean {
   const defined = new Set<Value>(g.ops.flatMap((op) => op.results));
   if (defined.size === 0) {