@aleph-ai/tinyaleph 1.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (58) hide show
  1. package/LICENSE +21 -0
  2. package/README.md +278 -0
  3. package/backends/cryptographic/index.js +196 -0
  4. package/backends/index.js +15 -0
  5. package/backends/interface.js +89 -0
  6. package/backends/scientific/index.js +272 -0
  7. package/backends/semantic/index.js +527 -0
  8. package/backends/semantic/surface.js +393 -0
  9. package/backends/semantic/two-layer.js +375 -0
  10. package/core/fano.js +127 -0
  11. package/core/hilbert.js +564 -0
  12. package/core/hypercomplex.js +141 -0
  13. package/core/index.js +133 -0
  14. package/core/llm.js +132 -0
  15. package/core/prime.js +184 -0
  16. package/core/resonance.js +695 -0
  17. package/core/rformer-tf.js +1086 -0
  18. package/core/rformer.js +806 -0
  19. package/core/sieve.js +350 -0
  20. package/data.json +8163 -0
  21. package/docs/EXAMPLES_PLAN.md +293 -0
  22. package/docs/README.md +159 -0
  23. package/docs/design/ALEPH_CHAT_ARCHITECTURE.md +499 -0
  24. package/docs/guide/01-quickstart.md +298 -0
  25. package/docs/guide/02-semantic-computing.md +409 -0
  26. package/docs/guide/03-cryptographic.md +420 -0
  27. package/docs/guide/04-scientific.md +494 -0
  28. package/docs/guide/05-llm-integration.md +568 -0
  29. package/docs/guide/06-advanced.md +996 -0
  30. package/docs/guide/README.md +188 -0
  31. package/docs/reference/01-core.md +695 -0
  32. package/docs/reference/02-physics.md +601 -0
  33. package/docs/reference/03-backends.md +892 -0
  34. package/docs/reference/04-engine.md +632 -0
  35. package/docs/reference/README.md +252 -0
  36. package/docs/theory/01-prime-semantics.md +327 -0
  37. package/docs/theory/02-hypercomplex-algebra.md +421 -0
  38. package/docs/theory/03-phase-synchronization.md +364 -0
  39. package/docs/theory/04-entropy-reasoning.md +348 -0
  40. package/docs/theory/05-non-commutativity.md +402 -0
  41. package/docs/theory/06-two-layer-meaning.md +414 -0
  42. package/docs/theory/07-resonant-field-interface.md +419 -0
  43. package/docs/theory/08-semantic-sieve.md +520 -0
  44. package/docs/theory/09-temporal-emergence.md +298 -0
  45. package/docs/theory/10-quaternionic-memory.md +415 -0
  46. package/docs/theory/README.md +162 -0
  47. package/engine/aleph.js +418 -0
  48. package/engine/index.js +7 -0
  49. package/index.js +23 -0
  50. package/modular.js +254 -0
  51. package/package.json +99 -0
  52. package/physics/collapse.js +95 -0
  53. package/physics/entropy.js +88 -0
  54. package/physics/index.js +65 -0
  55. package/physics/kuramoto.js +91 -0
  56. package/physics/lyapunov.js +80 -0
  57. package/physics/oscillator.js +95 -0
  58. package/types/index.d.ts +575 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
1
+ # Temporal Emergence and PRSC
2
+
3
+ This document covers Prime-Resonant Symbolic Computation (PRSC), a foundational framework that redefines time as an emergent property of symbolic phase alignment.
4
+
5
+ ## Overview
6
+
7
+ Traditional computational architectures rely on a global clock to synchronize discrete state transitions, treating time as a linear, externally imposed scalar. PRSC takes a radically different approach: **time emerges from the alignment of prime-indexed oscillators**.
8
+
9
+ The key insight: even in classical systems, the clock is a periodic oscillator—an underlying resonance mechanism that indexes state propagation. Time is an artifact of periodic phase thresholds, not a fundamental flow.
10
+
11
+ ---
12
+
13
+ ## The PRSC Formalism
14
+
15
+ ### Symbolic Phase Space
16
+
17
+ In PRSC, symbolic states are represented as phase oscillators indexed by prime numbers. Each prime pᵢ drives an oscillator with frequency:
18
+
19
+ ```
20
+ fᵢ ∝ 1/pᵢ
21
+ ```
22
+
23
+ This ensures **incommensurate periods** and a non-repeating temporal field. Incommensurate frequencies can never perfectly synchronize, creating a rich dynamical landscape.
24
+
25
+ The global phase state is a vector:
26
+
27
+ ```
28
+ Φ(t) = (Φ₁(t), Φ₂(t), ..., Φₙ(t))
29
+ ```
30
+
31
+ where Φᵢ(t) is the phase of the i-th symbolic subspace.
32
+
33
+ ### The Coherence Function
34
+
35
+ The coherence function C(t) measures phase alignment across all oscillators:
36
+
37
+ ```
38
+ C(t) = Σᵢ,ⱼ wᵢⱼ · cos(Φᵢ(t) - Φⱼ(t))
39
+ ```
40
+
41
+ where wᵢⱼ are weights reflecting symbolic proximity.
42
+
43
+ **A temporal event occurs when:**
44
+
45
+ ```
46
+ C(t) ≥ C_threshold
47
+ ```
48
+
49
+ This event defines a "tick" of emergent time, replacing the global clock with a dynamic, symbolic convergence process.
50
+
51
+ ### Visualization
52
+
53
+ ```
54
+ t →
55
+ ╭──────────────────────────────────────────╮
56
+ Φ₁₃(t) │ ∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿ │
57
+ Φ₁₇(t) │ ∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼∼ │
58
+ Φ₁₉(t) │ ≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈ │
59
+ ╰──────────────────────────────────────────╯
60
+ ↑ ↑
61
+ Event 1 Event 2
62
+ (C > C_th) (C > C_th)
63
+ ```
64
+
65
+ ---
66
+
67
+ ## Entropy and State Collapse
68
+
69
+ System evolution is governed by an entropy operator combining Hamiltonian dynamics with dissipation:
70
+
71
+ ```
72
+ d/dt |ψ(t)⟩ = Ĥ|ψ(t)⟩ - λ(R̂ - τ_stable)|ψ(t)⟩
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ where:
76
+ - Ĥ is the Hamiltonian (energy operator)
77
+ - λ controls entropy dissipation
78
+ - R̂ is the resonance operator
79
+ - τ_stable is the stability threshold
80
+
81
+ ### Collapse Probability
82
+
83
+ The probability of state collapse follows:
84
+
85
+ ```
86
+ P_collapse = 1 - e^(-∫ Ŝ(t) dt)
87
+ ```
88
+
89
+ where:
90
+ ```
91
+ Ŝ(t) = S₀ e^(-λt)
92
+ ```
93
+
94
+ This means computation occurs **only when symbolic states achieve sufficient coherence**, mimicking quantum-like collapse in a classical system.
95
+
96
+ ---
97
+
98
+ ## Quaternionic Resonance
99
+
100
+ For primes p ≡ 1 (mod 12), symbolic states are encoded using Gaussian and Eisenstein factorizations embedded in quaternions:
101
+
102
+ ```
103
+ φₖ = c + ki + jℓ + dk, where k = j·i
104
+ ```
105
+
106
+ ### The Quaternionic Resonance Field
107
+
108
+ ```
109
+ ψ_q(x, t) = N⁻¹ ψ̄_q(x) · exp(iφ(x, t))
110
+ ```
111
+
112
+ A projection operator maps this to a Bloch vector:
113
+
114
+ ```
115
+ Ĉ_q : H_q → ℝ⁴
116
+ Ĉ_q|ψ_q⟩ = (1/‖ψ_q‖²)⟨ψ_q, ξ', ξ'⟩
117
+ ```
118
+
119
+ ### Quaternionic Synchronization
120
+
121
+ Nodes in a distributed system synchronize through phase-locking:
122
+
123
+ ```
124
+ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
125
+ │ Node 1 │ │ Node 2 │
126
+ │ ψ_q^(1) │◄────────────►│ ψ_q^(2) │
127
+ │ q=a+bi+cj+dk │ Phase-lock │ q'=a'+b'i+c'j+d'k│
128
+ └─────────────────┘ Δψ_q∈[0,π] └─────────────────┘
129
+ ```
130
+
131
+ Collapse occurs when:
132
+ 1. Ŝ(y) < 0.3 (low entropy)
133
+ 2. The twist angle is properly aligned
134
+
135
+ This enhances non-local communication by stabilizing states against noise.
136
+
137
+ ---
138
+
139
+ ## Distributed Holographic Memory
140
+
141
+ ### Local Memory Fields
142
+
143
+ Each node in a distributed PRSC system maintains a local holographic memory field:
144
+
145
+ ```
146
+ (M)ᵣ = Σ_p∈set F_r α_p^(r) e^(-S_r(x,y)) e^(ipθ_r)
147
+ ```
148
+
149
+ ### Global Memory State
150
+
151
+ The global memory emerges from weighted combination:
152
+
153
+ ```
154
+ (M) = Σᵣ wᵣ(M)ᵣ
155
+ ```
156
+
157
+ ### Retrieval Process
158
+
159
+ 1. **Local Resonance**: Apply R̂ᵣ(n) to reconstruct |ψᵣ⟩
160
+ 2. **Global Coherence**: Synchronize via:
161
+ ```
162
+ C_global(t) = Σᵢ,ᵣ Σ_p∈set Fᵣ cos(φ_p^(r) - φᵢ^(r)) · α_p^(r) α_i^(r)
163
+ ```
164
+ 3. **Quaternionic Synchronization**: Exchange ψ_q^(r) with phase-locking
165
+
166
+ Successful retrieval occurs when C_global(t) ≥ γ_global.
167
+
168
+ ```
169
+ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
170
+ │ Node 1 │ │ Node 2 │ │ Node 3 │
171
+ │ (M)₁ │ │ (M)₂ │ │ (M)₃ │
172
+ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘
173
+ │ │ │
174
+ └────────────────┼────────────────┘
175
+
176
+
177
+ ┌──────────┐
178
+ │ Global │
179
+ │ (M) │
180
+ └──────────┘
181
+ ```
182
+
183
+ ---
184
+
185
+ ## Resonant Instruction Selection
186
+
187
+ The resonant instruction selection operator projects the symbolic state onto instruction attractors at each temporal event:
188
+
189
+ ```
190
+ Π̂_res : H_M → H_I
191
+
192
+ I_k = arg max_{I∈H_I} |⟨ψ(t)|I⟩|² subject to C(t) ≥ τ
193
+ ```
194
+
195
+ This triggers execution based on resonance, enabling:
196
+ - Parallel computation
197
+ - Adaptive instruction selection
198
+ - Content-dependent execution paths
199
+
200
+ ---
201
+
202
+ ## RISA: Resonant Instruction Set Architecture
203
+
204
+ PRSC is implemented through RISA, which includes:
205
+
206
+ ### Core Instructions
207
+
208
+ | Instruction | Description |
209
+ |-------------|-------------|
210
+ | `RES p, a, φ` | Initialize prime oscillator with amplitude and phase |
211
+ | `COHERE threshold` | Set coherence threshold for temporal events |
212
+ | `PROJ state` | Project state onto instruction space |
213
+ | `COLLAPSE` | Force state collapse |
214
+
215
+ ### Distributed Operations
216
+
217
+ | Instruction | Description |
218
+ |-------------|-------------|
219
+ | `SEND_QUAT q, node` | Transmit quaternionic state to node |
220
+ | `RECV_QUAT q, node` | Integrate received quaternionic state |
221
+ | `SYNC_GLOBAL p1, p2, node` | Align phases across nodes |
222
+
223
+ ---
224
+
225
+ ## ResoLang
226
+
227
+ ResoLang is a programming language for PRSC implementation:
228
+
229
+ ```resolang
230
+ % Define oscillators
231
+ primelet p13 = oscillator(prime=13, amplitude=0.7, phase=1.0);
232
+ primelet p17 = oscillator(prime=17, amplitude=0.5, phase=1.3);
233
+
234
+ % Quaternionic state
235
+ quatstate q = quaternion(p13, gaussian=(1,2), eisenstein=(3,4));
236
+
237
+ % Symbolic state
238
+ state s = {p13:0.7, p17:0.5};
239
+
240
+ % Store and retrieve via resonance
241
+ resonant (threshold=0.8) {
242
+ store s in memory;
243
+ retrieve s from global_memory;
244
+ }
245
+ ```
246
+
247
+ ---
248
+
249
+ ## Applications
250
+
251
+ ### Symbolic AI
252
+ Context-aware, non-linear reasoning that respects semantic relationships.
253
+
254
+ ### Quantum-like Search
255
+ Probabilistic efficiency through resonance-based exploration.
256
+
257
+ ### Decentralized Identity
258
+ Non-local identity management through quaternionic synchronization.
259
+
260
+ ### Quantum Computing
261
+ Classical analogs for quantum algorithm design and testing.
262
+
263
+ ### Cognitive Modeling
264
+ Modeling attention, time perception, and memory retrieval.
265
+
266
+ ---
267
+
268
+ ## Experimental Predictions
269
+
270
+ PRSC makes testable predictions:
271
+
272
+ 1. **Non-uniform execution delay**: Increases with symbolic complexity
273
+ 2. **Temporal compression**: Dense firing during alignment
274
+ 3. **Resonance interference patterns**: Observable in memory fields
275
+ 4. **Time symmetry breaking**: Near bifurcation points in phase space
276
+
277
+ These can be validated via simulations or physical resonator arrays.
278
+
279
+ ---
280
+
281
+ ## Implementation in Aleph
282
+
283
+ Aleph implements PRSC concepts through:
284
+
285
+ - **Prime-indexed oscillators** → `physics/oscillator.js`, `physics/kuramoto.js`
286
+ - **Coherence functions** → `physics/entropy.js`
287
+ - **State collapse** → `physics/collapse.js`
288
+ - **Temporal events** → `engine/aleph.js` (transform application on entropy threshold)
289
+ - **Quaternionic states** → `core/hypercomplex.js` (sedenions generalize quaternions)
290
+
291
+ ---
292
+
293
+ ## Related Documents
294
+
295
+ - [Prime Semantics →](./01-prime-semantics.md)
296
+ - [Phase Synchronization →](./03-phase-synchronization.md)
297
+ - [Entropy and Reasoning →](./04-entropy-reasoning.md)
298
+ - [Quaternionic Memory Field →](./10-quaternionic-memory.md)
@@ -0,0 +1,415 @@
1
+ # Quaternionic Memory Field
2
+
3
+ This document covers the Quaternionic Memory Field (QMF), a formalism for encoding semantic information as dynamic unit quaternions within a high-dimensional Hilbert space.
4
+
5
+ ## Overview
6
+
7
+ The Quaternionic Memory Field extends standard complex phase vectors into 4-dimensional hypercomplex space. This enables:
8
+
9
+ - **Rotational semantics**: Meaning encoded as orientations in 4D space
10
+ - **Non-commutative composition**: Order of operations affects outcome
11
+ - **Smooth interpolation**: Continuous transitions between semantic states
12
+ - **Active memory**: Memory as a resonant field, not static storage
13
+
14
+ ---
15
+
16
+ ## Mathematical Foundation
17
+
18
+ ### Quaternion Definition
19
+
20
+ The fundamental unit of semantic orientation is the quaternion q ∈ ℍ:
21
+
22
+ ```
23
+ q = w + xi + yj + zk
24
+ ```
25
+
26
+ The basis elements satisfy the Hamilton relations:
27
+
28
+ ```
29
+ i² = j² = k² = ijk = -1
30
+ ```
31
+
32
+ From these, the multiplication rules follow:
33
+
34
+ ```
35
+ ij = k, jk = i, ki = j
36
+ ji = -k, kj = -i, ik = -j
37
+ ```
38
+
39
+ ### Unit Quaternion Constraint
40
+
41
+ All semantic states are normalized (unit quaternions):
42
+
43
+ ```
44
+ |q| = √(w² + x² + y² + z²) = 1
45
+ ```
46
+
47
+ This ensures semantic operations represent **pure rotations** in 4D space, preserving structural integrity. Unit quaternions form a 3-sphere (S³) embedded in 4D space.
48
+
49
+ ```
50
+ z(k)
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+ ─────┼───── y(j)
55
+ ╱│
56
+ ╱ │
57
+ ╱ │
58
+ x(i)
59
+
60
+ Unit hypersphere: w² + x² + y² + z² = 1
61
+ ```
62
+
63
+ ---
64
+
65
+ ## The Extended Field Space
66
+
67
+ ### Prime-Quaternionic Hilbert Space
68
+
69
+ Standard holographic memory uses a Prime Hilbert Space (H_prime) with orthogonal basis vectors indexed by primes. The quaternionic extension tensor-products this with the quaternion space:
70
+
71
+ ```
72
+ H_Q = H_prime ⊗ ℍ
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ A state vector |Ψ⟩ in this field is a superposition of prime modes, where each mode carries a quaternion coefficient:
76
+
77
+ ```
78
+ |Ψ⟩ = Σᵢ qᵢ|pᵢ⟩
79
+ ```
80
+
81
+ where:
82
+ - |pᵢ⟩ is the basis vector for the i-th prime
83
+ - qᵢ is the quaternion encoding the semantic orientation of that mode
84
+
85
+ ---
86
+
87
+ ## The Four Semantic Axes
88
+
89
+ Unlike standard Euclidean coordinates, quaternion components represent **functional properties** of memory:
90
+
91
+ | Component | Name | Semantic Role |
92
+ |-----------|------|---------------|
93
+ | **w** (scalar) | Coherence | Stability, "truth" alignment, presence strength |
94
+ | **x** (i-axis) | Security | Boundary integrity, encapsulation, safety |
95
+ | **y** (j-axis) | Performance | Efficiency, speed, optimization |
96
+ | **z** (k-axis) | Usability | Accessibility, interface quality, UX |
97
+
98
+ ```
99
+ w: Coherence
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+ ─────────┼────────── y: Performance
104
+ ╱│
105
+ ╱ │
106
+ ╱ │
107
+ x: Security z: Usability
108
+ ```
109
+
110
+ This semantic interpretation means:
111
+ - High w → stable, grounded memory
112
+ - High x → well-protected information
113
+ - High y → efficiently retrievable
114
+ - High z → easily understood
115
+
116
+ ---
117
+
118
+ ## Text-to-Field Encoding
119
+
120
+ Information is encoded into the field by modulating the quaternion axes using prime-based harmonics:
121
+
122
+ ### Scalar Component (w)
123
+ ```
124
+ w = Σₖ cos(2πfₖ · charₖ)
125
+ ```
126
+ Modulated by cosine functions to establish base coherence.
127
+
128
+ ### Vector Components (x, y, z)
129
+ ```
130
+ x = Σₖ sin(2πfₖ · charₖ) · weight_security
131
+ y = Σₖ sin(2πfₖ · charₖ) · weight_performance
132
+ z = Σₖ sin(2πfₖ · charₖ) · weight_usability
133
+ ```
134
+ Modulated by mixed sine/cosine functions to distribute semantic weight.
135
+
136
+ The result is a unique "rotational signature" for any text.
137
+
138
+ ---
139
+
140
+ ## Non-Commutative Composition
141
+
142
+ The composition of two memory states uses the **Hamilton Product**:
143
+
144
+ ```
145
+ q₁ × q₂ = (w₁w₂ - v₁·v₂, w₁v₂ + w₂v₁ + v₁×v₂)
146
+ ```
147
+
148
+ where v₁ = (x₁, y₁, z₁) and v₂ = (x₂, y₂, z₂).
149
+
150
+ ### The Critical Property
151
+
152
+ **Order matters**. In general:
153
+
154
+ ```
155
+ q₁ × q₂ ≠ q₂ × q₁
156
+ ```
157
+
158
+ The **Commutator** measures this divergence:
159
+
160
+ ```
161
+ [q₁, q₂] = q₁q₂ - q₂q₁
162
+ ```
163
+
164
+ If ‖[q₁, q₂]‖ > ε, the sequence is **order-dependent**.
165
+
166
+ ```
167
+ q₁ ────────► q₁ × q₂
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+ q₂ ─────╲──► q₂ × q₁
172
+
173
+ Different results! (Non-commutative)
174
+ ```
175
+
176
+ ### Semantic Implication
177
+
178
+ This allows the field to distinguish:
179
+ - "Action A then Action B"
180
+ - vs. "Action B then Action A"
181
+
182
+ For example:
183
+ - "encrypt then send" ≠ "send then encrypt"
184
+ - "read then write" ≠ "write then read"
185
+
186
+ ---
187
+
188
+ ## Field Operations
189
+
190
+ ### Holographic Superposition
191
+
192
+ Memories are superposed into the global field via element-wise complex multiplication combined with quaternionic rotation:
193
+
194
+ ```
195
+ Ψ_total = Σᵢ (Φ_keyᵢ ⊛ Φ_dataᵢ) × qᵢ
196
+ ```
197
+
198
+ where:
199
+ - Φ = Complex phase vectors (content)
200
+ - q = Quaternion encoding (semantic orientation)
201
+ - ⊛ = Element-wise interaction
202
+
203
+ When a new pattern is superposed, it **rotates** the existing quaternion field at that prime index.
204
+
205
+ ### Resonance and Retrieval
206
+
207
+ Retrieval is a resonance operation. The **Resonance Score** combines structural and semantic alignment:
208
+
209
+ ```
210
+ R = α · Jaccard(Σ_query, Σ_pattern) + β · |q_query · q_pattern|
211
+ ```
212
+
213
+ 1. **Prime Signature Similarity (Jaccard)**: Do query and memory share prime factors?
214
+ 2. **Semantic Alignment (Dot Product)**: Do they point in the same 4D direction?
215
+
216
+ ---
217
+
218
+ ## Entanglement Mechanics
219
+
220
+ Two memories become **entangled** when their shared structure exceeds a threshold.
221
+
222
+ ### Entanglement Strength
223
+
224
+ ```
225
+ E(A, B) = ½ · (|Σ_A ∩ Σ_B| / max(|Σ_A|, |Σ_B|) + |q_A · q_B|)
226
+ ```
227
+
228
+ If E ≥ 0.3 (typical threshold), an explicit link forms.
229
+
230
+ ```
231
+ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
232
+ │ Memory A │◄───────────────────│ Memory B │
233
+ │ │ Entanglement │ │
234
+ │ q_A │ E(A,B) ≥ 0.3 │ q_B │
235
+ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
236
+ ```
237
+
238
+ ### Teleportation
239
+
240
+ Entanglement enables **teleportation**: accessing Memory B instantaneously when interacting with Memory A. This creates a navigable graph within the field.
241
+
242
+ ---
243
+
244
+ ## Field Stability Metrics
245
+
246
+ Three metrics ensure the memory field remains useful:
247
+
248
+ ### Entropy (S)
249
+
250
+ Measures information dispersion across prime modes:
251
+
252
+ ```
253
+ S = -Σ pᵢ log₂(pᵢ) / log₂(N)
254
+ ```
255
+
256
+ | Entropy | Meaning |
257
+ |---------|---------|
258
+ | Low (≈0) | Concentrated, sharp memory |
259
+ | High (≈1) | Diffuse, noisy |
260
+
261
+ ### Coherence (C)
262
+
263
+ Measures phase alignment:
264
+
265
+ ```
266
+ C = |Σ e^(iθⱼ)| / N
267
+ ```
268
+
269
+ | Coherence | Meaning |
270
+ |-----------|---------|
271
+ | ≈1.0 | Perfectly phase-locked, high confidence |
272
+ | ≈0.0 | Random phases, confusion |
273
+
274
+ ### Lyapunov Stability (λ)
275
+
276
+ Measures divergence of trajectories over time:
277
+
278
+ ```
279
+ λ = lim_{n→∞} (1/n) Σ ln(|dS_{i+1}/dS_i|)
280
+ ```
281
+
282
+ | λ | Meaning |
283
+ |---|---------|
284
+ | < 0 | Stable, converging to truth |
285
+ | > 0 | Unstable, risk of hallucination |
286
+
287
+ ---
288
+
289
+ ## Interpolation: SLERP
290
+
291
+ Linear interpolation fails for rotations. To transition smoothly between semantic states q₁ and q₂, use **Spherical Linear Interpolation** (SLERP):
292
+
293
+ ```
294
+ Slerp(q₁, q₂, t) = sin((1-t)Ω)/sin(Ω) · q₁ + sin(tΩ)/sin(Ω) · q₂
295
+ ```
296
+
297
+ where:
298
+ ```
299
+ cos(Ω) = q₁ · q₂
300
+ ```
301
+
302
+ ```
303
+ ╭─────────────────╮
304
+ ╱ ╲
305
+ ╱ SLERP path ╲
306
+ q₁ ──────────────────── q₂
307
+ ╲ ╱
308
+ ╲ Linear path ╱
309
+ ╰─────────────────╯
310
+
311
+ (SLERP traces the shortest path on S³)
312
+ ```
313
+
314
+ This enables smooth "thought transitions" between distinct concepts.
315
+
316
+ ---
317
+
318
+ ## Visualization
319
+
320
+ To visualize the 4D memory field, use a two-step projection:
321
+
322
+ ### Step 1: Stereographic Projection (4D → 3D)
323
+
324
+ ```
325
+ (x, y, z)_3D = (x, y, z)_4D / (1 - w)
326
+ ```
327
+
328
+ Projects the quaternion onto a 3D hyperplane.
329
+
330
+ ### Step 2: Perspective Projection (3D → 2D)
331
+
332
+ Standard perspective projection using depth (z) to scale node size, representing semantic "closeness" to the observer.
333
+
334
+ ---
335
+
336
+ ## Key Invariants
337
+
338
+ For logical consistency, preserve these invariants:
339
+
340
+ | Invariant | Requirement |
341
+ |-----------|-------------|
342
+ | **Unit Norm** | All quaternions satisfy \|q\| = 1 |
343
+ | **Prime Uniqueness** | Each memory has unique prime signature |
344
+ | **Entropy Bounds** | 0 ≤ S ≤ 1 |
345
+ | **Symmetric Entanglement** | E(A,B) = E(B,A) |
346
+ | **Commutator Sensitivity** | Non-commutative operations respected |
347
+
348
+ ---
349
+
350
+ ## Implementation in Aleph
351
+
352
+ Aleph implements QMF concepts through:
353
+
354
+ ### Hypercomplex States
355
+ The `SedenionState` class generalizes quaternions to 16 dimensions (sedenions contain quaternions as a subspace):
356
+
357
+ ```javascript
358
+ const { SedenionState } = require('./core/hypercomplex');
359
+
360
+ // Create quaternion-like state (first 4 components)
361
+ const q = new SedenionState([w, x, y, z, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]);
362
+ ```
363
+
364
+ ### Non-Commutative Multiplication
365
+ The `multiply()` method respects non-commutativity:
366
+
367
+ ```javascript
368
+ const q1q2 = q1.multiply(q2);
369
+ const q2q1 = q2.multiply(q1);
370
+ // q1q2 ≠ q2q1 in general
371
+ ```
372
+
373
+ ### Field Metrics
374
+ Physics module provides entropy and stability:
375
+
376
+ ```javascript
377
+ const { computeEntropy } = require('./physics/entropy');
378
+ const { lyapunov } = require('./physics/lyapunov');
379
+
380
+ const entropy = computeEntropy(state);
381
+ const stability = lyapunov(entropyTrajectory);
382
+ ```
383
+
384
+ ### Semantic Encoding
385
+ Backend encodes text to quaternionic field:
386
+
387
+ ```javascript
388
+ const backend = new SemanticBackend(config);
389
+ const state = backend.textToOrderedState('secure fast usable');
390
+ // State encodes security, performance, usability orientations
391
+ ```
392
+
393
+ ---
394
+
395
+ ## Relation to Other Frameworks
396
+
397
+ | QMF Concept | Aleph Implementation |
398
+ |-------------|---------------------|
399
+ | Quaternion q | SedenionState (generalized) |
400
+ | Unit norm | `state.normalize()` |
401
+ | Hamilton product | `state.multiply()` |
402
+ | Prime Hilbert space | Prime-indexed oscillators |
403
+ | Coherence C | `state.coherence()` |
404
+ | Entropy S | `computeEntropy()` |
405
+ | Entanglement | Zero-divisor detection |
406
+ | SLERP | Interpolation via progressive collapse |
407
+
408
+ ---
409
+
410
+ ## Related Documents
411
+
412
+ - [Hypercomplex Algebra →](./02-hypercomplex-algebra.md)
413
+ - [Non-Commutativity →](./05-non-commutativity.md)
414
+ - [Entropy and Reasoning →](./04-entropy-reasoning.md)
415
+ - [Temporal Emergence →](./09-temporal-emergence.md)