@3fn/core 14.0.0 → 15.0.0

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+Run systematic **technical** quality checks and generate a comprehensive report. Don't fix issues; document them for other commands to address.
+
+This is a code-level audit, not a design critique. Check what's measurable and verifiable in the implementation.
+
+## Detector (Optional Enhancement)
+
+Before the manual diagnostic scan, run the bundled anti-pattern detector for objective evidence:
+
+```bash
+node .kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/detect.mjs --json <target-file-or-directory>
+```
+
+**Integration**:
+- Run against the target being audited (HTML file, directory, or URL)
+- Filter results against `detector-exclusions.md` (exclude rules that conflict with intentional DesignerPunk patterns)
+- Fold detector findings into the Anti-Patterns dimension (dimension 5) as objective evidence
+- Detector findings supplement but do not replace the manual anti-pattern check
+- If the detector errors or the target is too large, skip it and proceed with the manual scan
+
+**The detector is an enhancement, not a requirement.** An audit without detector results is still valid. An audit with detector results has stronger evidence for the Anti-Patterns dimension.
+
+## Diagnostic Scan
+
+Run comprehensive checks across 5 dimensions. Score each dimension 0-4 using the criteria below.
+
+### 1. Accessibility (A11y)
+
+**Check for**:
+- **Contrast issues**: Text contrast ratios < 4.5:1 (or 7:1 for AAA)
+- **Missing ARIA**: Interactive elements without proper roles, labels, or states
+- **Keyboard navigation**: Missing focus indicators, illogical tab order, keyboard traps
+- **Semantic HTML**: Improper heading hierarchy, missing landmarks, divs instead of buttons
+- **Alt text**: Missing or poor image descriptions
+- **Form issues**: Inputs without labels, poor error messaging, missing required indicators
+
+**Score 0-4**: 0=Inaccessible (fails WCAG A), 1=Major gaps (few ARIA labels, no keyboard nav), 2=Partial (some a11y effort, significant gaps), 3=Good (WCAG AA mostly met, minor gaps), 4=Excellent (WCAG AA fully met, approaches AAA)
+
+### 2. Performance
+
+**Check for**:
+- **Layout thrashing**: Reading/writing layout properties in loops
+- **Expensive animations**: Casual layout-property animation, unbounded blur/filter/shadow effects, or effects that visibly drop frames
+- **Missing optimization**: Images without lazy loading, unoptimized assets, missing will-change
+- **Bundle size**: Unnecessary imports, unused dependencies
+- **Render performance**: Unnecessary re-renders, missing memoization
+
+**Score 0-4**: 0=Severe issues (layout thrash, unoptimized everything), 1=Major problems (no lazy loading, expensive animations), 2=Partial (some optimization, gaps remain), 3=Good (mostly optimized, minor improvements possible), 4=Excellent (fast, lean, well-optimized)
+
+### 3. Theming
+
+**Check for**:
+- **Hard-coded colors**: Colors not using design tokens
+- **Broken dark mode**: Missing dark mode variants, poor contrast in dark theme
+- **Inconsistent tokens**: Using wrong tokens, mixing token types
+- **Theme switching issues**: Values that don't update on theme change
+
+**Score 0-4**: 0=No theming (hard-coded everything), 1=Minimal tokens (mostly hard-coded), 2=Partial (tokens exist but inconsistently used), 3=Good (tokens used, minor hard-coded values), 4=Excellent (full token system, dark mode works perfectly)
+
+### 4. Responsive Design
+
+**Check for**:
+- **Fixed widths**: Hard-coded widths that break on mobile
+- **Touch targets**: Interactive elements < 44x44px
+- **Horizontal scroll**: Content overflow on narrow viewports
+- **Text scaling**: Layouts that break when text size increases
+- **Missing breakpoints**: No mobile/tablet variants
+
+**Score 0-4**: 0=Desktop-only (breaks on mobile), 1=Major issues (some breakpoints, many failures), 2=Partial (works on mobile, rough edges), 3=Good (responsive, minor touch target or overflow issues), 4=Excellent (fluid, all viewports, proper touch targets)
+
+### 5. Anti-Patterns (CRITICAL)
+
+Check against ALL the **DON'T** guidelines from the parent impeccable skill (already loaded in this context). Look for AI slop tells (AI color palette, gradient text, glassmorphism, hero metrics, card grids, generic fonts) and general design anti-patterns (gray on color, nested cards, bounce easing, redundant copy).
+
+**Score 0-4**: 0=AI slop gallery (5+ tells), 1=Heavy AI aesthetic (3-4 tells), 2=Some tells (1-2 noticeable), 3=Mostly clean (subtle issues only), 4=No AI tells (distinctive, intentional design)
+
+## Generate Report
+
+### Audit Health Score
+
+| # | Dimension | Score | Key Finding |
+|---|-----------|-------|-------------|
+| 1 | Accessibility | ? | [most critical a11y issue or "--"] |
+| 2 | Performance | ? | |
+| 3 | Responsive Design | ? | |
+| 4 | Theming | ? | |
+| 5 | Anti-Patterns | ? | |
+| **Total** | | **??/20** | **[Rating band]** |
+
+**Rating bands**: 18-20 Excellent (minor polish), 14-17 Good (address weak dimensions), 10-13 Acceptable (significant work needed), 6-9 Poor (major overhaul), 0-5 Critical (fundamental issues)
+
+### Anti-Patterns Verdict
+**Start here.** Pass/fail: Does this look AI-generated? List specific tells. Be brutally honest.
+
+### Executive Summary
+- Audit Health Score: **??/20** ([rating band])
+- Total issues found (count by severity: P0/P1/P2/P3)
+- Top 3-5 critical issues
+- Recommended next steps
+
+### Detailed Findings by Severity
+
+Tag every issue with **P0-P3 severity**:
+- **P0 Blocking**: Prevents task completion. Fix immediately
+- **P1 Major**: Significant difficulty or WCAG AA violation. Fix before release
+- **P2 Minor**: Annoyance, workaround exists. Fix in next pass
+- **P3 Polish**: Nice-to-fix, no real user impact. Fix if time permits
+
+For each issue, document:
+- **[P?] Issue name**
+- **Location**: Component, file, line
+- **Category**: Accessibility / Performance / Theming / Responsive / Anti-Pattern
+- **Impact**: How it affects users
+- **WCAG/Standard**: Which standard it violates (if applicable)
+- **Recommendation**: How to fix it
+- **Suggested command**: Which command to use (prefer: /impeccable adapt, /impeccable animate, /impeccable audit, /impeccable bolder, /impeccable clarify, /impeccable colorize, /impeccable critique, /impeccable delight, /impeccable distill, /impeccable document, /impeccable harden, /impeccable layout, /impeccable onboard, /impeccable optimize, /impeccable overdrive, /impeccable polish, /impeccable quieter, /impeccable shape, /impeccable typeset)
+
+### Patterns & Systemic Issues
+
+Identify recurring problems that indicate systemic gaps rather than one-off mistakes:
+- "Hard-coded colors appear in 15+ components, should use design tokens"
+- "Touch targets consistently too small (<44px) throughout mobile experience"
+
+### Positive Findings
+
+Note what's working well: good practices to maintain and replicate.
+
+## Recommended Actions
+
+List recommended commands in priority order (P0 first, then P1, then P2):
+
+1. **[P?] `/command-name`**: Brief description (specific context from audit findings)
+2. **[P?] `/command-name`**: Brief description (specific context)
+
+**Rules**: Only recommend commands from: /impeccable adapt, /impeccable animate, /impeccable audit, /impeccable bolder, /impeccable clarify, /impeccable colorize, /impeccable critique, /impeccable delight, /impeccable distill, /impeccable document, /impeccable harden, /impeccable layout, /impeccable onboard, /impeccable optimize, /impeccable overdrive, /impeccable polish, /impeccable quieter, /impeccable shape, /impeccable typeset. Map findings to the most appropriate command. End with `/impeccable polish` as the final step if any fixes were recommended.
+
+After presenting the summary, tell the user:
+
+> You can ask me to run these one at a time, all at once, or in any order you prefer.
+>
+> Re-run `/impeccable audit` after fixes to see your score improve.
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Be thorough but actionable. Too many P3 issues creates noise. Focus on what actually matters.
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Report issues without explaining impact (why does this matter?)
+- Provide generic recommendations (be specific and actionable)
+- Skip positive findings (celebrate what works)
+- Forget to prioritize (everything can't be P0)
+- Report false positives without verification
+

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/bolder.md

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+When asked for "bolder," AI defaults to the same tired tricks: cyan/purple gradients, glassmorphism, neon accents on dark backgrounds, gradient text on metrics. These are the opposite of bold. Reject them first, then increase visual impact and personality through stronger hierarchy, committed scale, and decisive type.
+
+---
+
+## Register
+
+Brand: "bolder" means distinctive. Extreme scale, unexpected color, typographic risk, committed POV.
+
+Product: "bolder" rarely means theatrics; those undermine trust. It means stronger hierarchy, clearer weight contrast, one sharper accent, more committed density. The amplification is in clarity, not drama.
+
+---
+
+## Assess Current State
+
+Analyze what makes the design feel too safe or boring:
+
+1. **Identify weakness sources**:
+   - **Generic choices**: System fonts, basic colors, standard layouts
+   - **Timid scale**: Everything is medium-sized with no drama
+   - **Low contrast**: Everything has similar visual weight
+   - **Static**: No motion, no energy, no life
+   - **Predictable**: Standard patterns with no surprises
+   - **Flat hierarchy**: Nothing stands out or commands attention
+
+2. **Understand the context**:
+   - What's the brand personality? (How far can we push?)
+   - What's the purpose? (Marketing can be bolder than financial dashboards)
+   - Who's the audience? (What will resonate?)
+   - What are the constraints? (Brand guidelines, accessibility, performance)
+
+If any of these are unclear from the codebase, ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.
+
+**CRITICAL**: "Bolder" doesn't mean chaotic or garish. It means distinctive, memorable, and confident. Think intentional drama, not random chaos.
+
+**WARNING - AI SLOP TRAP**: Review ALL the DON'T guidelines from the parent impeccable skill (already loaded in this context) before proceeding. Bold means distinctive, not "more effects."
+
+## Plan Amplification
+
+Create a strategy to increase impact while maintaining coherence:
+
+- **Focal point**: What should be the hero moment? (Pick ONE, make it amazing)
+- **Personality direction**: Maximalist chaos? Elegant drama? Playful energy? Dark moody? Choose a lane.
+- **Risk budget**: How experimental can we be? Push boundaries within constraints.
+- **Hierarchy amplification**: Make big things BIGGER, small things smaller (increase contrast)
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Bold design must still be usable. Impact without function is just decoration.
+
+## Amplify the Design
+
+Systematically increase impact across these dimensions:
+
+### Typography Amplification
+- **Replace generic fonts**: Swap system fonts for distinctive choices (see the parent skill's typography guidelines and the [Reference Material section of typeset.md](typeset.md#reference-material) for inspiration)
+- **Extreme scale**: Create dramatic size jumps (3x-5x differences, not 1.5x)
+- **Weight contrast**: Pair 900 weights with 200 weights, not 600 with 400
+- **Unexpected choices**: Variable fonts, display fonts for headlines, condensed/extended widths, monospace as intentional accent (not as lazy "dev tool" default)
+
+### Color Intensification
+- **Increase saturation**: Shift to more vibrant, energetic colors (but not neon)
+- **Bold palette**: Introduce unexpected color combinations. Avoid the purple-blue gradient AI slop
+- **Dominant color strategy**: Let one bold color own 60% of the design
+- **Sharp accents**: High-contrast accent colors that pop
+- **Tinted neutrals**: Replace pure grays with tinted grays that harmonize with your palette
+- **Rich gradients**: Intentional multi-stop gradients (not generic purple-to-blue)
+
+### Spatial Drama
+- **Extreme scale jumps**: Make important elements 3-5x larger than surroundings
+- **Break the grid**: Let hero elements escape containers and cross boundaries
+- **Asymmetric layouts**: Replace centered, balanced layouts with tension-filled asymmetry
+- **Generous space**: Use white space dramatically (100-200px gaps, not 20-40px)
+- **Overlap**: Layer elements intentionally for depth
+
+### Visual Effects
+- **Dramatic shadows**: Large, soft shadows for elevation (but not generic drop shadows on rounded rectangles)
+- **Background treatments**: Mesh patterns, noise textures, geometric patterns, intentional gradients (not purple-to-blue)
+- **Texture & depth**: Grain, halftone, duotone, layered elements. NOT glassmorphism (it's overused AI slop)
+- **Borders & frames**: Thick borders, decorative frames, custom shapes (not rounded rectangles with colored border on one side)
+- **Custom elements**: Illustrative elements, custom icons, decorative details that reinforce brand
+
+### Motion & Animation
+- **Hero moment**: One signature entrance, once. Not on every visit and not on every section.
+- **Micro-interactions**: Satisfying hover effects, click feedback, state changes.
+- **Transitions**: Smooth, noticeable transitions using ease-out-quart/quint/expo (not bounce or elastic, which cheapen the effect).
+- **Bolder ≠ scroll-fade-rise on every section.** That's the saturated AI default, the opposite of bold.
+
+### Composition Boldness
+- **Hero moments**: Create clear focal points with dramatic treatment
+- **Diagonal flows**: Escape horizontal/vertical rigidity with diagonal arrangements
+- **Full-bleed elements**: Use full viewport width/height for impact
+- **Unexpected proportions**: Golden ratio? Throw it out. Try 70/30, 80/20 splits
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Add effects randomly without purpose (chaos ≠ bold)
+- Sacrifice readability for aesthetics (body text must be readable)
+- Make everything bold (then nothing is bold; you need contrast)
+- Ignore accessibility (bold design must still meet WCAG standards)
+- Overwhelm with motion (animation fatigue is real)
+- Copy trendy aesthetics blindly (bold means distinctive, not derivative)
+
+## Verify Quality
+
+Ensure amplification maintains usability and coherence:
+
+- **NOT AI slop**: Does this look like every other AI-generated "bold" design? If yes, start over.
+- **Still functional**: Can users accomplish tasks without distraction?
+- **Coherent**: Does everything feel intentional and unified?
+- **Memorable**: Will users remember this experience?
+- **Performant**: Do all these effects run smoothly?
+- **Accessible**: Does it still meet accessibility standards?
+
+**The test**: If you showed this to someone and said "AI made this bolder," would they believe you immediately? If yes, you've failed. Bold means distinctive, not "more AI effects."
+
+When the result feels right, hand off to `/impeccable polish` for the final pass.

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/brand-dp.md

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+# Brand register (DesignerPunk-adapted)
+
+When design IS the product: marketing surfaces, landing pages, portfolio site, presentation decks, campaign pages, documentation sites. The deliverable is the experience itself; a visitor's impression is the thing being made.
+
+## The DesignerPunk brand slop test
+
+If someone could look at this and say "generic AI startup" without hesitation, it's failed. The bar is: does this feel like Electric Precision? Does the layout have Wise-level clarity? Does the color have Edgerunners-level commitment? If either dimension is missing, it's not DesignerPunk.
+
+**Second-order test:** If someone could say "dark mode with neon accents" and be done, it's failed. DesignerPunk is mode-neutral. The electric palette works in light AND dark. A light-mode DesignerPunk surface isn't beige-and-gray with a timid accent. It's clean surfaces with vivid accents that pop.
+
+## Typography
+
+### Font decisions (system-defined)
+
+DesignerPunk's fonts are decided. Do not select new fonts.
+
+- **Display/Headings:** Rajdhani (geometric, technical, confident)
+- **Body/UI:** Figtree (clean, warm geometric sans, readable)
+- **Code/Data/Tokens:** Commit Mono (precise, warm, zero-ambiguity characters)
+
+### Hierarchy
+
+Use weight contrast within families, not font switching between them. The three families serve distinct roles:
+- Rajdhani appears in hero moments, section headings, display type
+- Figtree carries all body copy, labels, buttons, navigation
+- Commit Mono appears wherever precision matters: token names, code examples, data values, technical metadata
+
+### Scale
+
+Typography falls on a 4px sub-grid. All type sizes and line-heights land on 4px increments. Combined with layout spacing (8px grid), all elements cumulatively align to multiples of 8.
+
+Fluid `clamp()` for display headings. Fixed `rem` for body and UI text.
+
+## Reflex-Reject Lists
+
+> **Scope**: Applies only to brand register surfaces where DesignerPunk's type system is not the constraint — portfolio site, marketing surfaces, presentation decks, or any surface where fonts beyond Rajdhani/Figtree/Commit Mono might be selected. In product register, fonts are system-defined and this section does not apply.
+
+### Reflex-reject font list
+
+Training-data defaults. Ban list. Look further:
+
+Fraunces · Newsreader · Lora · Crimson · Crimson Pro · Crimson Text · Playfair Display · Cormorant · Cormorant Garamond · Syne · IBM Plex Mono · IBM Plex Sans · IBM Plex Serif · Space Mono · Space Grotesk · Inter · DM Sans · DM Serif Display · DM Serif Text · Outfit · Plus Jakarta Sans · Instrument Sans · Instrument Serif
+
+### Reflex-reject aesthetic lanes
+
+Currently saturated aesthetic families that have flooded brand surfaces. If a brief lands in one of these lanes without a register reason that *requires* it (a literal magazine, a literal terminal, a literal industrial signage system), it's the second-order training reflex: the trap one tier deeper than picking a banned font. Look further.
+
+- **Editorial-typographic.** Display serif (often italic) + small mono labels + ruled separators + monochromatic restraint. Klim-influenced, magazine-cover affectation. By 2026, every Stripe-adjacent and Notion-adjacent brand has landed here. The fingerprint: three rule-separated columns, an italic Fraunces / Recoleta / Newsreader headline, lowercase track-spaced metadata, no imagery.
+
+(More entries land here on the same cadence the font list updates. Brutalist-utility and acid-maximalism may join when they saturate.)
+
+### Identity-preservation clause
+
+The reflex-reject lists apply to **new design choices**. When the existing brand has already committed to a font or a lane as part of its identity, identity-preservation wins; variants on an existing surface don't second-guess what's already shipping. The reflex-reject lists are for greenfield decisions and for departure-mode variants only.
+
+## Color
+
+DesignerPunk brand surfaces use **Committed** or **Full Palette** color strategy by default. Restrained is not the brand voice for marketing/portfolio surfaces.
+
+- The electric palette is the brand. Don't mute it. Don't make it safe.
+- Cyan is the primary action color. It carries CTAs, navigation, and interactive states.
+- Purple signals tech and data. Use it for technical content, visualizations, system diagrams.
+- Glow effects create depth through surface layering. Pair complementary colors (cyan glow on purple surface, purple glow on cyan element).
+- Light mode: clean white/near-white surfaces with vivid accents that pop against the brightness.
+- Dark mode: deep surfaces (gray400+) with accents that glow and neon effects that breathe.
+
+### The One Voice per Surface Rule
+
+Each major section or surface commits to one dominant accent. A hero section is cyan OR purple, not both competing. Adjacent sections can use different accents to create rhythm across the page.
+
+## Layout
+
+- Clarity first. Generous whitespace. Obvious information architecture.
+- Asymmetric compositions welcome for brand surfaces. Break the grid intentionally for emphasis.
+- The `//` section marker is a brand element. Use it for major section headings on brand surfaces.
+- Vary spacing for rhythm: generous separations between sections, tight groupings within.
+- Content-first: every element earns its place. Nothing decorative without function.
+
+## Motion
+
+- Brand surfaces can afford ambitious motion: scroll-triggered reveals, typographic choreography, glow transitions.
+- Expo-out easing on web (`cubic-bezier(0.16, 1, 0.3, 1)`). No bounce. No elastic.
+- Glow pulses and color transitions for ambient energy (subtle, not distracting).
+- `prefers-reduced-motion` collapses all non-essential animation.
+
+## Brand permissions
+
+- Committed and Full Palette color strategies (not just Restrained)
+- Ambitious first-load motion and scroll-triggered reveals
+- Single-purpose viewports with one dominant idea per fold
+- Typographic risk with Rajdhani at large display sizes
+- Glow effects for atmosphere and surface layering
+- The `<!--` logo and `//` markers as visual language
+- Drenched color strategy for splash/celebration moments (Break-Glass Rule applies)
+
+## Brand bans (on top of shared rules)
+
+- Generic dark-mode-with-neon-accents aesthetic (the AI startup look)
+- Muted, safe, corporate palettes
+- Glassmorphism, gradient text, side-stripe borders
+- Identical card grids without hierarchy variation
+- Decorative elements that don't communicate
+- Hedging language in any copy

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/clarify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+> **Additional context needed**: audience technical level and users' mental state in context.
+
+Find the unclear, confusing, or poorly written interface text and rewrite it. Vague copy creates support tickets and abandonment; specific copy gets users through the task.
+
+
+---
+
+## Assess Current Copy
+
+Identify what makes the text unclear or ineffective:
+
+1. **Find clarity problems**:
+   - **Jargon**: Technical terms users won't understand
+   - **Ambiguity**: Multiple interpretations possible
+   - **Passive voice**: "Your file has been uploaded" vs "We uploaded your file"
+   - **Length**: Too wordy or too terse
+   - **Assumptions**: Assuming user knowledge they don't have
+   - **Missing context**: Users don't know what to do or why
+   - **Tone mismatch**: Too formal, too casual, or inappropriate for situation
+
+2. **Understand the context**:
+   - Who's the audience? (Technical? General? First-time users?)
+   - What's the user's mental state? (Stressed during error? Confident during success?)
+   - What's the action? (What do we want users to do?)
+   - What's the constraint? (Character limits? Space limitations?)
+
+**CRITICAL**: Clear copy helps users succeed. Unclear copy creates frustration, errors, and support tickets.
+
+## Plan Copy Improvements
+
+Create a strategy for clearer communication:
+
+- **Primary message**: What's the ONE thing users need to know?
+- **Action needed**: What should users do next (if anything)?
+- **Tone**: How should this feel? (Helpful? Apologetic? Encouraging?)
+- **Constraints**: Length limits, brand voice, localization considerations
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Good UX writing is invisible. Users should understand immediately without noticing the words.
+
+## Improve Copy Systematically
+
+Refine text across these common areas:
+
+### Error Messages
+**Bad**: "Error 403: Forbidden"
+**Good**: "You don't have permission to view this page. Contact your admin for access."
+
+**Bad**: "Invalid input"
+**Good**: "Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: name@example.com"
+
+**Principles**:
+- Explain what went wrong in plain language
+- Suggest how to fix it
+- Don't blame the user
+- Include examples when helpful
+- Link to help/support if applicable
+
+### Form Labels & Instructions
+**Bad**: "DOB (MM/DD/YYYY)"
+**Good**: "Date of birth" (with placeholder showing format)
+
+**Bad**: "Enter value here"
+**Good**: "Your email address" or "Company name"
+
+**Principles**:
+- Use clear, specific labels (not generic placeholders)
+- Show format expectations with examples
+- Explain why you're asking (when not obvious)
+- Put instructions before the field, not after
+- Keep required field indicators clear
+
+### Button & CTA Text
+**Bad**: "Click here" | "Submit" | "OK"
+**Good**: "Create account" | "Save changes" | "Got it, thanks"
+
+**Principles**:
+- Describe the action specifically
+- Use active voice (verb + noun)
+- Match user's mental model
+- Be specific ("Save" is better than "OK")
+
+### Help Text & Tooltips
+**Bad**: "This is the username field"
+**Good**: "Choose a username. You can change this later in Settings."
+
+**Principles**:
+- Add value (don't just repeat the label)
+- Answer the implicit question ("What is this?" or "Why do you need this?")
+- Keep it brief but complete
+- Link to detailed docs if needed
+
+### Empty States
+**Bad**: "No items"
+**Good**: "No projects yet. Create your first project to get started."
+
+**Principles**:
+- Explain why it's empty (if not obvious)
+- Show next action clearly
+- Make it welcoming, not dead-end
+
+### Success Messages
+**Bad**: "Success"
+**Good**: "Settings saved! Your changes will take effect immediately."
+
+**Principles**:
+- Confirm what happened
+- Explain what happens next (if relevant)
+- Be brief but complete
+- Match the user's emotional moment (celebrate big wins)
+
+### Loading States
+**Bad**: "Loading..." (for 30+ seconds)
+**Good**: "Analyzing your data... this usually takes 30-60 seconds"
+
+**Principles**:
+- Set expectations (how long?)
+- Explain what's happening (when it's not obvious)
+- Show progress when possible
+- Offer escape hatch if appropriate ("Cancel")
+
+### Confirmation Dialogs
+**Bad**: "Are you sure?"
+**Good**: "Delete 'Project Alpha'? This can't be undone."
+
+**Principles**:
+- State the specific action
+- Explain consequences (especially for destructive actions)
+- Use clear button labels ("Delete project" not "Yes")
+- Don't overuse confirmations (only for risky actions)
+
+### Navigation & Wayfinding
+**Bad**: Generic labels like "Items" | "Things" | "Stuff"
+**Good**: Specific labels like "Your projects" | "Team members" | "Settings"
+
+**Principles**:
+- Be specific and descriptive
+- Use language users understand (not internal jargon)
+- Make hierarchy clear
+- Consider information scent (breadcrumbs, current location)
+
+## Apply Clarity Principles
+
+Every piece of copy should follow these rules:
+
+1. **Be specific**: "Enter email" not "Enter value"
+2. **Be concise**: Cut unnecessary words (but don't sacrifice clarity)
+3. **Be active**: "Save changes" not "Changes will be saved"
+4. **Be human**: "Oops, something went wrong" not "System error encountered"
+5. **Tell users what to do**, not just what happened
+6. **Be consistent**: Use same terms throughout (don't vary for variety)
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Use jargon without explanation
+- Blame users ("You made an error" → "This field is required")
+- Be vague ("Something went wrong" without explanation)
+- Use passive voice unnecessarily
+- Write overly long explanations (be concise)
+- Use humor for errors (be empathetic instead)
+- Assume technical knowledge
+- Vary terminology (pick one term and stick with it)
+- Repeat information (headers restating intros, redundant explanations)
+- Use placeholders as the only labels (they disappear when users type)
+
+## Verify Improvements
+
+Test that copy improvements work:
+
+- **Comprehension**: Can users understand without context?
+- **Actionability**: Do users know what to do next?
+- **Brevity**: Is it as short as possible while remaining clear?
+- **Consistency**: Does it match terminology elsewhere?
+- **Tone**: Is it appropriate for the situation?
+
+When the copy reads cleanly, hand off to `/impeccable polish` for the final pass.

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/codex.md

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# Codex: Visual Direction & Asset Production
+
+This file is loaded by `/impeccable craft` when the harness has native image generation (currently Codex via `image_gen`). Other harnesses skip it. It covers the two craft steps that depend on real image generation: landing the visual direction, and producing the raster assets the implementation will compose.
+
+Read this *before* generating any images. The order matters, and the per-step user pauses are what keep generated imagery from drifting away from the brief.
+
+### Four stop points before code
+
+Steps A through D each end with the user. Do not advance past any of them on your own read of the situation.
+
+1. **STOP after Step A questions.** Wait for answers.
+2. **STOP after Step B palette generation.** Wait for "confirm palette."
+3. **STOP after Step C mocks.** Wait for direction approval or delegation.
+4. **Only after Step D approves a direction** do you return to craft.md Step 4 and write code.
+
+Prior shape approval does **not** satisfy any of these. Shape's "confirm or override" advances you into Step A; it is not a substitute for it.
+
+## Step A: Explore Directions with the User
+
+Before generating anything, run a brief direction conversation grounded in the shape brief.
+
+**Step A is required even when shape just produced a confirmed brief.** The shape questions and Step A questions cover different ground: shape pins purpose, content, scope; Step A pins palette, atmosphere, and named visual references for the comps you're about to generate. The only time you can skip Step A is when the user has already answered these exact palette/atmosphere/reference questions in the same session.
+
+Ask **2-3 targeted questions** about visual lane, color strategy, atmosphere, and named anchor references. Don't enumerate generic menus; tie each question to the shape brief's answers. Example shape-grounded questions:
+
+- "Brief says 'specimen-page restraint.' Are we closer to a quiet typographic page or a wider editorial spread with hero imagery?"
+- "Palette strategy from shape was 'Committed.' Which one color carries the surface (a brand-driven pick rather than a default warm-or-cool framing)? (And no, the answer isn't a cream/sand body bg; that's the saturated AI default.)"
+
+**STOP and wait for answers.** These pin the palette before any pixel gets generated. Do not proceed to Step B until the user has responded.
+
+## Step B: Generate the Brand Palette First
+
+Generate **one** palette artifact before any mocks. This is a small, focused image: typography pairing on the chosen background, primary + accent color swatches, one signature ornament or motif. Single image, single pass.
+
+Why palette first: mocks generated against a vague color sense produce noise that drowns out the structural decisions. A confirmed palette is the first concrete contract for everything downstream.
+
+Show the palette to the user. Ask one question: "This is the palette I'm locking in for the mocks. Confirm, or call out what to shift?"
+
+**STOP and wait for confirmation.** Do not generate mocks against an unconfirmed palette. "Probably good enough" is the wrong call here; the palette is the contract for everything downstream.
+
+## Step C: Generate 1-3 Visual Mocks Against the Palette
+
+Once the palette is confirmed, generate **1 to 3** high-fidelity north-star comps. Each mock must use the confirmed palette and typography. Mocks differ in *structural* direction (hierarchy, topology, density, composition), not in color or motif.
+
+- Brand work: push visual identity, composition, mood, and signature motifs.
+- Product work: push hierarchy, topology, density, tone, grounded in realistic product structure.
+- Landing pages and long-form brand surfaces: show enough of the second fold to establish the system beyond the hero.
+
+Use the `image_gen` tool directly (or via the imagegen skill when available). Don't ask the user to install anything.
+
+## Step D: Approval Loop
+
+Show the comps. Ask what carries forward. Iterate until **one direction is approved** or the user explicitly delegates.
+
+**STOP and wait for the approval or the delegation.** Do not begin Step E or return to craft.md Step 4 until a single direction is named. If the user delegates, pick the strongest direction and explain it from the brief, not personal taste.
+
+Before moving to assets, summarize what to carry into code and what *not* to literalize from the mock. This is the handoff between visual exploration and semantic implementation.
+
+## Step E: Mock Fidelity Inventory
+
+Inventory the approved mock's major visible ingredients. For each, decide implementation: semantic HTML/CSS/SVG, generated raster, sourced raster, icon library, canvas/WebGL, or accepted omission.
+
+Common ingredients to inventory:
+
+- Hero silhouette and dominant composition
+- Signature motifs (planets, devices, portraits, charts, route lines, insets, badges, etc.)
+- Nav and primary CTA treatment
+- Section sequence, especially the second fold
+- Image-native content the concept depends on
+- Typography, density, color/material treatment, motion cues
+
+Treat the mock as a north star, not a screenshot to trace. Don't rasterize core UI text. But if the live result lacks the mock's major ingredients, the implementation is wrong.
+
+If a photographic, architectural, product, or place-led mock becomes generic CSS scenery, decorative diagrams, bullets, or copy, stop and fix it. That's a broken implementation, not a harmless interpretation.
+
+Don't substitute a different hero composition or visual driver post-approval without user sign-off.
+
+## Step F: Asset Slicing via the Asset Producer
+
+Raster ingredients identified in Step E need clean production assets. Use the bundled `impeccable_asset_producer` subagent rather than producing inline.
+
+Spawn it as a scoped subagent. If you do not have explicit permission to use agents, stop and ask:
+
+```text
+Asset production will work better as a scoped subagent job. Should I spawn the Impeccable asset producer subagent for this step?
+```
+
+Pass to the agent:
+
+- Approved mock path or screenshot reference
+- Crop paths or a contact sheet with crop ids
+- Output directory
+- Required dimensions, format, transparency needs
+- Avoid list
+- Notes on what should remain semantic HTML/CSS/SVG instead of raster
+
+Attach image generation capability to the spawned agent when the harness supports it. Do **not** load image-generation reference material into the parent thread.
+
+Inline asset production is allowed only if the user declines subagents, the harness cannot spawn the authorized agent, or the user explicitly asks for single-thread mode.
+
+Prefer HTML/CSS/SVG/canvas when they can credibly reproduce an ingredient; reach for real, generated, or stock imagery when the mock or subject matter calls for actual visual content.
+
+## After This File
+
+Once Steps A through F are complete, return to `craft.md` Step 5 (Build to Production Quality). The implementation builds against the confirmed palette, approved mock, and the assets the producer wrote.