pupu 0.0.1

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/be_close.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should be_close(expected, delta)
+    #   should_not be_close(expected, delta)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual == expected +/- delta
+    #
+    # == Example
+    #
+    #   result.should be_close(3.0, 0.5)
+    def be_close(expected, delta)
+      Matcher.new :be_close, expected, delta do |_expected_, _delta_|
+        match do |actual|
+          (actual - _expected_).abs < _delta_
+        end
+
+        failure_message_for_should do |actual|
+          "expected #{_expected_} +/- (< #{_delta_}), got #{actual}"
+        end
+
+        failure_message_for_should_not do |actual|
+          "expected #{_expected_} +/- (< #{_delta_}), got #{actual}"
+        end
+
+        description do
+          "be close to #{_expected_} (within +- #{_delta_})"
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/be_instance_of.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should be_instance_of(expected)
+    #   should be_an_instance_of(expected)
+    #   should_not be_instance_of(expected)
+    #   should_not be_an_instance_of(expected)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual.instance_of?(expected)
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   5.should be_instance_of(Fixnum)
+    #   5.should_not be_instance_of(Numeric)
+    #   5.should_not be_instance_of(Float)
+    def be_an_instance_of(expected)
+      Matcher.new :be_an_instance_of, expected do |_expected_|
+        match do |actual|
+          actual.instance_of?(_expected_)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+    
+    alias_method :be_instance_of, :be_an_instance_of
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/be_kind_of.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should be_kind_of(expected)
+    #   should be_a_kind_of(expected)
+    #   should_not be_kind_of(expected)
+    #   should_not be_a_kind_of(expected)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual.kind_of?(expected)
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   5.should be_kind_of(Fixnum)
+    #   5.should be_kind_of(Numeric)
+    #   5.should_not be_kind_of(Float)
+    def be_a_kind_of(expected)
+      Matcher.new :be_a_kind_of, expected do |_expected_|
+        match do |actual|
+          actual.kind_of?(_expected_)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+    
+    alias_method :be_kind_of, :be_a_kind_of
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/change.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    
+    #Based on patch from Wilson Bilkovich
+    class Change #:nodoc:
+      def initialize(receiver=nil, message=nil, &block)
+        @message = message || "result"
+        @value_proc = block || lambda {receiver.__send__(message)}
+        @to = @from = @minimum = @maximum = @amount = nil
+      end
+      
+      def matches?(event_proc)
+        raise_block_syntax_error if block_given?
+        
+        @before = evaluate_value_proc
+        event_proc.call
+        @after = evaluate_value_proc
+        
+        return (@to = false) if @from unless @from == @before
+        return false if @to unless @to == @after
+        return (@before + @amount == @after) if @amount
+        return ((@after - @before) >= @minimum) if @minimum
+        return ((@after - @before) <= @maximum) if @maximum        
+        return @before != @after
+      end
+      
+      def raise_block_syntax_error
+        raise MatcherError.new(<<-MESSAGE
+block passed to should or should_not change must use {} instead of do/end
+MESSAGE
+        )
+      end
+      
+      def evaluate_value_proc
+        @value_proc.call
+      end
+      
+      def failure_message_for_should
+        if @to
+          "#{@message} should have been changed to #{@to.inspect}, but is now #{@after.inspect}"
+        elsif @from
+          "#{@message} should have initially been #{@from.inspect}, but was #{@before.inspect}"
+        elsif @amount
+          "#{@message} should have been changed by #{@amount.inspect}, but was changed by #{actual_delta.inspect}"
+        elsif @minimum
+          "#{@message} should have been changed by at least #{@minimum.inspect}, but was changed by #{actual_delta.inspect}"
+        elsif @maximum
+          "#{@message} should have been changed by at most #{@maximum.inspect}, but was changed by #{actual_delta.inspect}"
+        else
+          "#{@message} should have changed, but is still #{@before.inspect}"
+        end
+      end
+      
+      def actual_delta
+        @after - @before
+      end
+      
+      def failure_message_for_should_not
+        "#{@message} should not have changed, but did change from #{@before.inspect} to #{@after.inspect}"
+      end
+      
+      def by(amount)
+        @amount = amount
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def by_at_least(minimum)
+        @minimum = minimum
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def by_at_most(maximum)
+        @maximum = maximum
+        self
+      end      
+      
+      def to(to)
+        @to = to
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def from (from)
+        @from = from
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def description
+        "change ##{@message}"
+      end
+    end
+    
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should change(receiver, message, &block)
+    #   should change(receiver, message, &block).by(value)
+    #   should change(receiver, message, &block).from(old).to(new)
+    #   should_not change(receiver, message, &block)
+    #
+    # Allows you to specify that a Proc will cause some value to change.
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player) 
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count)
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player) 
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count).by(1)
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player) 
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count).by_at_least(1)
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player)
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count).by_at_most(1)    
+    #
+    #   string = "string"
+    #   lambda {
+    #     string.reverse!
+    #   }.should change { string }.from("string").to("gnirts")
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     person.happy_birthday
+    #   }.should change(person, :birthday).from(32).to(33)
+    #       
+    #   lambda {
+    #     employee.develop_great_new_social_networking_app
+    #   }.should change(employee, :title).from("Mail Clerk").to("CEO")
+    #
+    # Evaluates <tt>receiver.message</tt> or <tt>block</tt> before and after
+    # it evaluates the c object (generated by the lambdas in the examples
+    # above).
+    #
+    # Then compares the values before and after the <tt>receiver.message</tt>
+    # and evaluates the difference compared to the expected difference.
+    #
+    # == WARNING
+    # <tt>should_not change</tt> only supports the form with no
+    # subsequent calls to <tt>by</tt>, <tt>by_at_least</tt>,
+    # <tt>by_at_most</tt>, <tt>to</tt> or <tt>from</tt>.
+    #
+    # blocks passed to <tt>should</tt> <tt>change</tt> and <tt>should_not</tt>
+    # <tt>change</tt> must use the <tt>{}</tt> form (<tt>do/end</tt> is not
+    # supported).
+    #
+    def change(receiver=nil, message=nil, &block)
+      Matchers::Change.new(receiver, message, &block)
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/compatibility.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Spec::Matchers.constants.each do |c|
+  if Class === (klass = Spec::Matchers.const_get(c))
+    if klass.public_instance_methods.any? {|m| ['failure_message_for_should',:failure_message_for_should].include?(m)}
+      klass.class_eval do
+        alias_method :failure_message, :failure_message_for_should
+      end
+    end
+    if klass.public_instance_methods.any? {|m| ['failure_message_for_should_not',:failure_message_for_should_not].include?(m)}
+      klass.class_eval do
+        alias_method :negative_failure_message, :failure_message_for_should_not
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/dsl.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    module DSL
+      # See Spec::Matchers
+      def define(name, &declarations)
+        define_method name do |*expected|
+          Spec::Matchers::Matcher.new name, *expected, &declarations
+        end
+      end
+      
+      # Deprecated - use define
+      def create(name, &declarations)
+        Spec.deprecate("Spec::Matchers.create","Spec::Matchers.define")
+        define(name, &declarations)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
+
+Spec::Matchers.extend Spec::Matchers::DSL

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/eql.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should eql(expected)
+    #   should_not eql(expected)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual and expected are of equal value, but not necessarily the same object.
+    #
+    # See http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html#M001057 for more information about equality in Ruby.
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   5.should eql(5)
+    #   5.should_not eql(3)
+    def eql(expected)
+      Matcher.new :eql, expected do |_expected_|
+        match do |actual|
+          actual.eql?(_expected_)
+        end
+
+        failure_message_for_should do |actual|
+          <<-MESSAGE
+
+expected #{_expected_.inspect}
+     got #{actual.inspect}
+
+(compared using eql?)
+MESSAGE
+        end
+
+        failure_message_for_should_not do |actual|
+          <<-MESSAGE
+
+expected #{actual.inspect} not to equal #{_expected_.inspect}
+
+(compared using eql?)
+MESSAGE
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/equal.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should equal(expected)
+    #   should_not equal(expected)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual and expected are the same object (object identity).
+    #
+    # See http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html#M001057 for more information about equality in Ruby.
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   5.should equal(5) #Fixnums are equal
+    #   "5".should_not equal("5") #Strings that look the same are not the same object
+    def equal(expected)
+      Matcher.new :equal, expected do |_expected_|
+        match do |actual|
+          actual.equal?(_expected_)
+        end
+        
+        def inspect_object(o)
+          "#<#{o.class}:#{o.object_id}> => #{o.inspect}"
+        end
+        
+        failure_message_for_should do |actual|
+          <<-MESSAGE
+
+expected #{inspect_object(_expected_)}
+     got #{inspect_object(actual)}
+
+Compared using equal?, which compares object identity,
+but expected and actual are not the same object. Use
+'actual.should == expected' if you don't care about
+object identity in this example.
+
+MESSAGE
+        end
+
+        failure_message_for_should_not do |actual|
+          <<-MESSAGE
+
+expected not #{inspect_object(actual)}
+         got #{inspect_object(_expected_)}
+
+Compared using equal?, which compares object identity.
+
+MESSAGE
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/errors.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    class MatcherError < StandardError; end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/exist.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should exist
+    #   should_not exist
+    #
+    # Passes if actual.exist?
+    def exist(arg=nil)
+      Matcher.new :exist do
+        match do |actual|
+          arg ? actual.exist?(arg) : actual.exist?
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/generated_descriptions.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    class << self
+      attr_accessor :last_matcher, :last_should # :nodoc:
+    end
+
+    def self.clear_generated_description
+      self.last_matcher = nil
+      self.last_should = nil
+    end
+
+    def self.generated_description
+      return nil if last_should.nil?
+      "#{last_should.to_s.gsub('_',' ')} #{last_description}"
+    end
+    
+  private
+    
+    def self.last_description
+      last_matcher.respond_to?(:description) ? last_matcher.description : <<-MESSAGE
+When you call a matcher in an example without a String, like this:
+
+specify { object.should matcher }
+
+or this:
+
+it { should matcher }
+
+RSpec expects the matcher to have a #description method. You should either
+add a String to the example this matcher is being used in, or give it a
+description method. Then you won't have to suffer this lengthy warning again.
+MESSAGE
+    end
+  end
+end
+      

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/matchers/has.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    
+    class Has
+      
+      def initialize(expected, *args, &block)
+        @expected, @args, @block = expected, args, block
+      end
+      
+      def matches?(actual)
+        actual.__send__(predicate(@expected), *@args, &@block)
+      end
+      
+      def failure_message_for_should
+        "expected ##{predicate(@expected)}(#{@args[0].inspect}) to return true, got false"
+      end
+      
+      def failure_message_for_should_not
+        "expected ##{predicate(@expected)}(#{@args[0].inspect}) to return false, got true"
+      end
+      
+      def description
+        "have key #{@args[0].inspect}"
+      end
+    
+    private
+    
+      def predicate(sym)
+        "#{sym.to_s.sub("have_","has_")}?".to_sym
+      end
+      
+    end
+    
+  end
+end