pupu 0.0.1

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/example/subject.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+module Spec
+  module Example
+    module Subject
+      module ExampleGroupMethods
+        # Defines an explicit subject for an example group which can then be the
+        # implicit receiver (through delegation) of calls to +should+.
+        #
+        # == Examples
+        #
+        #   describe CheckingAccount, "with $50" do
+        #     subject { CheckingAccount.new(:amount => 50, :currency => :USD) }
+        #     it { should have_a_balance_of(50, :USD) }
+        #     it { should_not be_overdrawn }
+        #     its(:currency) { should == :USD }
+        #   end
+        #
+        # See +ExampleMethods#should+ for more information about this approach.
+        def subject(&block)
+          block.nil? ?
+            explicit_subject || implicit_subject : @explicit_subject_block = block
+        end
+        
+        def its(attribute, &block)
+          describe(attribute) do
+            define_method(:subject) { super().send(attribute) }
+            it(&block)
+          end
+        end
+
+        attr_reader :explicit_subject_block # :nodoc:
+
+      private
+
+        def explicit_subject
+          group = self
+          while group.respond_to?(:explicit_subject_block)
+            return group.explicit_subject_block if group.explicit_subject_block
+            group = group.superclass
+          end
+        end
+
+        def implicit_subject
+          (described_class ? lambda {described_class.new} : lambda {description_args.first})
+        end
+      end
+
+      module ExampleMethods
+
+        alias_method :__should_for_example_group__,     :should
+        alias_method :__should_not_for_example_group__, :should_not
+
+        # Returns the subject defined in ExampleGroupMethods#subject. The
+        # subject block is only executed once per example, the result of which
+        # is cached and returned by any subsequent calls to +subject+.
+        #
+        # If a class is passed to +describe+ and no subject is explicitly
+        # declared in the example group, then +subject+ will return a new
+        # instance of that class.
+        #
+        # == Examples
+        #
+        #   # explicit subject defined by the subject method
+        #   describe Person do
+        #     subject { Person.new(:birthdate => 19.years.ago) }
+        #     it "should be eligible to vote" do
+        #       subject.should be_eligible_to_vote
+        #     end
+        #   end
+        #
+        #   # implicit subject => { Person.new }
+        #   describe Person do
+        #     it "should be eligible to vote" do
+        #       subject.should be_eligible_to_vote
+        #     end
+        #   end
+        def subject
+          @subject ||= instance_eval(&self.class.subject)
+        end
+
+        # When +should+ is called with no explicit receiver, the call is
+        # delegated to the object returned by +subject+. Combined with
+        # an implicit subject (see +subject+), this supports very concise
+        # expressions.
+        #
+        # == Examples
+        #
+        #   describe Person do
+        #     it { should be_eligible_to_vote }
+        #   end
+        def should(matcher=nil, message=nil)
+          self == subject ? self.__should_for_example_group__(matcher) : subject.should(matcher,message)
+        end
+
+        # Just like +should+, +should_not+ delegates to the subject (implicit or
+        # explicit) of the example group.
+        #
+        # == Examples
+        #
+        #   describe Person do
+        #     it { should_not be_eligible_to_vote }
+        #   end
+        def should_not(matcher=nil, message=nil)
+          self == subject ? self.__should_not_for_example_group__(matcher) : subject.should_not(matcher,message)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/expectations.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+require 'spec/matchers'
+require 'spec/expectations/fail_with'
+require 'spec/expectations/errors'
+require 'spec/expectations/extensions'
+require 'spec/expectations/handler'
+
+module Spec
+  
+  # Spec::Expectations lets you set expectations on your objects.
+  #
+  #   result.should == 37
+  #   team.should have(11).players_on_the_field
+  #
+  # == How Expectations work.
+  #
+  # Spec::Expectations adds two methods to Object:
+  #
+  #   should(matcher=nil)
+  #   should_not(matcher=nil)
+  #
+  # Both methods take an optional Expression Matcher (See Spec::Matchers).
+  #
+  # When +should+ receives an Expression Matcher, it calls <tt>matches?(self)</tt>. If
+  # it returns +true+, the spec passes and execution continues. If it returns
+  # +false+, then the spec fails with the message returned by <tt>matcher.failure_message</tt>.
+  #
+  # Similarly, when +should_not+ receives a matcher, it calls <tt>matches?(self)</tt>. If
+  # it returns +false+, the spec passes and execution continues. If it returns
+  # +true+, then the spec fails with the message returned by <tt>matcher.negative_failure_message</tt>.
+  #
+  # RSpec ships with a standard set of useful matchers, and writing your own
+  # matchers is quite simple. See Spec::Matchers for details.
+  module Expectations
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/errors.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+module Spec
+  module Expectations
+    # If Test::Unit is loaed, we'll use its error as baseclass, so that Test::Unit
+    # will report unmet RSpec expectations as failures rather than errors.
+    superclass = ['Test::Unit::AssertionFailedError', '::StandardError'].map do |c|
+      eval(c) rescue nil
+    end.compact.first
+    
+    class ExpectationNotMetError < superclass
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/extensions.rb

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+require 'spec/expectations/extensions/kernel'

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/extensions/kernel.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+module Kernel
+  # :call-seq:
+  #   should(matcher)
+  #   should == expected
+  #   should === expected
+  #   should =~ expected
+  #
+  #   receiver.should(matcher)
+  #     => Passes if matcher.matches?(receiver)
+  #
+  #   receiver.should == expected #any value
+  #     => Passes if (receiver == expected)
+  #
+  #   receiver.should === expected #any value
+  #     => Passes if (receiver === expected)
+  #
+  #   receiver.should =~ regexp
+  #     => Passes if (receiver =~ regexp)
+  #
+  # See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers
+  #
+  # == Warning
+  #
+  # NOTE that this does NOT support receiver.should != expected.
+  # Instead, use receiver.should_not == expected
+  def should(matcher=nil, message=nil, &block)
+    Spec::Expectations::PositiveExpectationHandler.handle_matcher(self, matcher, message, &block)
+  end
+  
+  # :call-seq:
+  #   should_not(matcher)
+  #   should_not == expected
+  #   should_not === expected
+  #   should_not =~ expected
+  #
+  #   receiver.should_not(matcher)
+  #     => Passes unless matcher.matches?(receiver)
+  #
+  #   receiver.should_not == expected
+  #     => Passes unless (receiver == expected)
+  #
+  #   receiver.should_not === expected
+  #     => Passes unless (receiver === expected)
+  #
+  #   receiver.should_not =~ regexp
+  #     => Passes unless (receiver =~ regexp)
+  #
+  # See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers
+  def should_not(matcher=nil, message=nil, &block)
+    Spec::Expectations::NegativeExpectationHandler.handle_matcher(self, matcher, message, &block)
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/fail_with.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+module Spec
+  module Expectations
+    class << self
+      attr_accessor :differ
+      
+      # raises a Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError with message
+      #
+      # When a differ has been assigned and fail_with is passed
+      # <code>expected</code> and <code>target</code>, passes them
+      # to the differ to append a diff message to the failure message.
+      def fail_with(message, expected=nil, target=nil) # :nodoc:
+        if message.nil?
+          raise ArgumentError, "Failure message is nil. Does your matcher define the " +
+                               "appropriate failure_message_for_* method to return a string?"
+        end
+        if (Array === message) & (message.length == 3)
+          ::Spec.warn(<<-NOTICE
+
+*****************************************************************
+DEPRECATION WARNING: you are using deprecated behaviour that will
+be removed from a future version of RSpec.
+
+* Support for matchers that return arrays from failure message
+methods is deprecated.
+* Instead, the matcher should return a string, and expose methods
+for the expected() and actual() values.
+*****************************************************************
+NOTICE
+          )
+          message, expected, target = message[0], message[1], message[2]
+        end
+        unless (differ.nil? || expected.nil? || target.nil?)
+          if expected.is_a?(String)
+            message << "\n\n Diff:" << self.differ.diff_as_string(target.to_s, expected)
+          elsif expected.is_a?(Hash) && target.is_a?(Hash)
+            message << "\n\n Diff:" << self.differ.diff_as_hash(target, expected)
+          elsif !target.is_a?(Proc)
+            message << "\n\n Diff:" << self.differ.diff_as_object(target, expected)
+          end
+        end
+        Kernel::raise(Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError.new(message))
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/handler.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+module Spec
+  module Expectations
+    class InvalidMatcherError < ArgumentError; end        
+    
+    class PositiveExpectationHandler        
+      def self.handle_matcher(actual, matcher, message=nil, &block)
+        ::Spec::Matchers.last_should = :should
+        ::Spec::Matchers.last_matcher = matcher
+        return ::Spec::Matchers::PositiveOperatorMatcher.new(actual) if matcher.nil?
+
+        match = matcher.matches?(actual, &block)
+        return match if match
+        
+        message ||= matcher.respond_to?(:failure_message_for_should) ?
+                    matcher.failure_message_for_should :
+                    matcher.failure_message
+        
+        if matcher.respond_to?(:diffable?) && matcher.diffable?
+          ::Spec::Expectations.fail_with message, matcher.expected.first, matcher.actual
+        else
+          ::Spec::Expectations.fail_with message
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    class NegativeExpectationHandler
+      def self.handle_matcher(actual, matcher, message=nil, &block)
+        ::Spec::Matchers.last_should = :should_not
+        ::Spec::Matchers.last_matcher = matcher
+        return ::Spec::Matchers::NegativeOperatorMatcher.new(actual) if matcher.nil?
+        
+        match = matcher.respond_to?(:does_not_match?) ?
+                !matcher.does_not_match?(actual, &block) :
+                matcher.matches?(actual, &block)
+        return match unless match
+        
+        message ||= matcher.respond_to?(:failure_message_for_should_not) ?
+                    matcher.failure_message_for_should_not :
+                    matcher.negative_failure_message
+
+        if matcher.respond_to?(:diffable?) && matcher.diffable?
+          ::Spec::Expectations.fail_with message, matcher.expected.first, matcher.actual
+        else
+          ::Spec::Expectations.fail_with message
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
+

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/extensions/instance_exec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    module InstanceExec
+      unless respond_to?(:instance_exec)
+        # based on Bounded Spec InstanceExec (Mauricio Fernandez)
+        # http://eigenclass.org/hiki/bounded+space+instance_exec
+        # - uses singleton_class of matcher instead of global
+        #   InstanceExecHelper module
+        # - this keeps it scoped to this class only, which is the
+        #   only place we need it
+        # - only necessary for ruby 1.8.6
+        def instance_exec(*args, &block)
+          singleton_class = (class << self; self; end)
+          begin
+            orig_critical, Thread.critical = Thread.critical, true
+            n = 0
+            n += 1 while respond_to?(method_name="__instance_exec#{n}")
+            singleton_class.module_eval{ define_method(:__instance_exec, &block) }
+          ensure
+            Thread.critical = orig_critical
+          end
+          begin
+            return send(:__instance_exec, *args)
+          ensure
+            singleton_class.module_eval{ remove_method(:__instance_exec) } rescue nil
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/interop/test.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+require 'spec'
+
+if Spec::Ruby.version.to_f >= 1.9
+  gem 'test-unit','= 1.2.3'
+end
+
+require 'test/unit'
+
+if Spec::Ruby.version.to_f >= 1.9
+  require 'test/unit/version'
+  if Test::Unit::VERSION > '1.2.3'
+    raise <<-MESSAGE
+#{'*' * 50}
+Required: test-unit-1.2.3
+Loaded:   test-unit-#{Test::Unit::VERSION}
+
+With ruby-1.9, rspec-#{Spec::VERSION::STRING} requires test-unit-1.2.3, and
+tries to force it with "gem 'test-unit', '= 1.2.3'" in:
+
+  #{__FILE__}
+  
+Unfortunately, test-unit-#{Test::Unit::VERSION} was loaded anyway. While we are
+aware of this bug we have not been able to track down its source.
+Until we do, you have two alternatives:
+
+* uninstall test-unit-2.0.3
+* use 'script/spec' instead of 'rake spec'
+#{'*' * 50}
+MESSAGE
+  end
+end
+
+
+require 'test/unit/testresult'
+
+require 'spec/interop/test/unit/testcase'
+require 'spec/interop/test/unit/testsuite_adapter'
+require 'spec/interop/test/unit/autorunner'
+require 'spec/interop/test/unit/testresult'
+require 'spec/interop/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner'
+
+Spec::Example::ExampleGroupFactory.default(Test::Unit::TestCase)
+
+Test::Unit.run = true

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/interop/test/unit/autorunner.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+class Test::Unit::AutoRunner
+  remove_method :process_args
+  def process_args(argv)
+    true
+  end
+end

data/vendor/rspec/lib/spec/interop/test/unit/testcase.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+require 'test/unit/testcase'
+
+module Test
+  module Unit
+    # This extension of the standard Test::Unit::TestCase makes RSpec
+    # available from within, so that you can do things like:
+    #
+    # require 'spec/test/unit'
+    #
+    # class MyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
+    #   it "should work with Test::Unit assertions" do
+    #     assert_equal 4, 2+1
+    #   end
+    #
+    #   def test_should_work_with_rspec_expectations
+    #     (3+1).should == 5
+    #   end
+    # end
+    #
+    # See also Spec::Example::ExampleGroup
+    class TestCase
+      extend Spec::Example::ExampleGroupMethods
+      include Spec::Example::ExampleMethods
+
+      def self.suite
+        Test::Unit::TestSuiteAdapter.new(self)
+      end
+
+      def self.example_method?(method_name)
+        should_method?(method_name) || test_method?(method_name)
+      end
+
+      def self.test_method?(method_name)
+        method_name =~ /^test./ && (
+          instance_method(method_name).arity == 0 ||
+          instance_method(method_name).arity == -1
+        )
+      end
+
+      before(:each) {setup}
+      after(:each) {teardown}
+
+      def initialize(description, &implementation)
+        super
+        # Some Test::Unit extensions depend on @method_name being present.
+        @method_name = description.description
+        @_result = ::Test::Unit::TestResult.new
+      end
+
+      def run(ignore_this_argument=nil)
+        super()
+      end
+
+    end
+  end
+end