foundational_lib2 1.0

data/Articles_MD/17.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,838 @@
+---
+title: Epistemology
+---
+
+There\'s no fucking way in hell that the mainstream engineering establishment would converse about this epistemology - I have tried for 5 years.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Eventually, this will get talked about.
+---------------------------------------
+
+In the beginning, there is
+==========================
+
+\* Existence (no self-ontology)
+
+\* Concreteness (no self-ontology)
+
+\* Anti-existence (anti-ontology \[for others and self too, not
+relevant, no self-ontology\])
+
+\* Anti-concreteness (anti-ontology \[for others and self too, not
+relevant, no self-ontology\])
+
+All of these attributes have no ontology. They don't exist.
+
+They are attributes, but they are not attributes of anything that
+exists.
+
+It is possible that other attributes are also present in the beginning,
+but they are not relevant and it wouldn't matter if they were present or
+not.
+
+Anti-existence and anti-concreteness both work, but are super vague.
+
+They both fail at their goals, leading to both existence and
+concreteness.
+
+Therefore something that has ontological existence comes into existence
+for the first time, with extremely low (possibly infinitesimal
+concreteness).
+
+In trying to make things not exist in the most abstract and poorly
+defined way, and in trying to get things not to be concrete in the most
+abstract and poorly defined way, they make something exist.
+
+This is Numbers or "numberness" or "numbernessness", etc. in probably
+the most abstract or one of the most abstract ways possible.
+
+Numberness combined with the super-abstract anti-existence and
+anti-concreteness again fail to interact and produce positionness.
+
+Positionness again fails to interact with those things and produces
+positions, multiple positions that have ontological significance.
+Probably a very large number of positions would be produced.
+
+Positionness interacting with those things produces groupness.
+
+Groupness interacts with those two things, which Try to remove the
+groupness from existence.
+
+Those things fail, and produce the content of groups, in probably a very
+abstract way.
+
+In the production of the content of groups, the following things happen.
+
+Elimination necessitation
+
+Firstly, to appease "The Eliminator" (a synonym for Simplification,
+Reductionism, Mathematics,
+
+Destructionism or Elimination, all of which are synonymous), the
+relationship between the two or more \"things\" needs to be defined
+clearly and explicitly. To do this, one requisite is that there needs to
+be a set, singular ordering of the two or more \"things\", no going
+back, no changing. The \"things\" go in a specific order.
+
+Therefore \| The ordering gets established, perhaps arbitrarily, in line
+with the way that "The Eliminator" does it.
+
+Elimination necessitation \| But the ordering can\'t be justified to the
+Eliminator as making sense, without an observer. The observer would have
+the effect of validating and justifying the rather arbitrary ordering.
+To the observer, the ordering is the proper ordering, and no other
+ordering would be proper.
+
+Therefore \| An observer comes about, first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness, of the validity of the ordering comes about, in order to
+justify the ordering to The Eliminator (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing) first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming)
+
+Awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+(Commentary: Spinoza, a man accused of as being an atheist, believed
+that everything was "mind". This is called idealism in philosophy, an
+idea that is not necessarily a religious one, and not necessarily a
+superstitious one. This is where "mind" would first come about. Later in
+the process, "mental health" comes about as well. This would be
+necessary for "mind".)
+
+Awareness of awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in
+order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+Commentary: The observer is also aware that they are aware.
+
+An incessant extension of the ordering comes about, as a "background
+process", if you will, to make the ordering not be finite, and therefore
+make sense.
+
+Each next item is one greater than the previous item.
+
+First this happens partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+There is an alteration of the awareness of the observer; the amount of
+awareness has new ontological attributes of itself come about as
+attributes of the observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to
+"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
+the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
+call in computer programming).
+
+Commentary:
+
+Therefore \| it could appear as if there were such things as "moments",
+to the observer.
+
+Therefore \| it could appear as if there were "time", to the observer.
+
+Commentary: For the observer to validate the ordering, the observer
+would need to be able to "agree"
+
+with sequential things, and "disagree" with nonsequential things. For
+the observer to agree with a state with its awareness, it needs to
+experience sensation.
+
+9\) Thus sensation comes about.
+
+Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+"Mental health" comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
+or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness of unitness of observer (Unitness means the condition of being
+"one thing").
+
+(Commentary: being aware that other observers exist, does not make them
+exist, does not make numbers exist, does not make them concrete and does
+not make numbers concrete. \[Nor does it make numerals concrete. None of
+these things exist yet. The other observers may or may not be aware yet.
+The other observers may or may not be aware that they are aware yet.)
+
+Awareness of other observers (non-concrete, non-ontological) comes about
+as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether
+or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+Awareness of separateness of other observers (non-ontological) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
+is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
+
+After awareness of the validity of the ordering fully comes about, and
+all of the aforementioned steps happen as well, the following things
+happen
+
+Awareness of existence (the high-level attribute, no ontology) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
+is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+Awareness of concreteness (high level attribute, no ontology) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
+is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+Awareness of concreteness of ordering comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
+as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness that concreteness of ordering is nonzero (greater than zero)
+(Concreteness != 0 or Concreteness \> 0, Concreteness could not be
+negative) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Once those previous 5 steps fully happen, the following starts to happen
+
+(Awareness then begins to come into existence in other ways that doesn't
+only have to do with the ordering.
+
+This is very, very interesting.)
+
+Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+(Commentary: Now that there is 1) awareness, 2) self-awareness, 3)
+awareness of others, their unitness and separateness and 4) awareness of
+the ordering, awareness of others starts to be defined more accurately,
+since awareness is early in this simplificational definition sequence,
+as listed above. This begins with the following)
+
+Awareness of Awareness of Awareness --- the awareness of (another
+observer's) awareness of awareness--- comes about, in order to justify
+an observer's Awareness of Awareness as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness --- the awareness of
+(another observer's) awareness of (an ordering's own, to self) awareness
+of awareness --- comes about, in order to justify an observer's
+Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and sensation,
+since awareness depends on mental health and sensation, which in effect
+are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness (5
+"awareness"es)-- awareness of (ones own; to self) awareness of the
+awareness of (another's) awareness of (one's own; to self) awareness of
+awareness --- comes about, in order to justify an observer's own
+Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and sensation,
+since awareness depends on mental health and sensation, which in effect
+are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Commentary: 5 awarenesses are all that are necessary. Awareness of
+self-awareness is basically the same thing as self-awareness. This
+process doesn't need to go on forever.
+
+Emotion, in order to experience the sensation of agreement comes about
+as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether
+or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+An attempt to gain awareness of ontological existence of other observers
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to
+"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
+the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
+call in computer programming).
+
+(Commentary, a little bit of a tangent, but bear with me: The attempt
+fails, which results in the following. It is not necessary that the
+"failure" be ontological. But the attempt doesn't work. Also, the
+ontological existence of the other observers may not may not be concrete
+yet, depending on the other observer. This the first and only true
+Communication between observers \[beings\] and is the only reason
+things, such as Barack Obama or a chair or a universe seem to exist.
+
+Spinoza said that everything is "mind". This "mind" would come about
+when "awareness" comes about. Spinoza believed that higher factors don't
+influence lower-level factors. I don't necessarily agree with this view,
+and Spinoza's claim is unproven. On the basis of reason and logic and
+mathematics alone, this book might prove the opposite.
+
+Spinoza was considered an Atheist in his day (even though this is kind
+of not true).
+
+Sense channel awareness come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Emotional Levels come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
+or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+An Emotional Spectrum comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness of the attempt to improve mental health of observer (being),
+due to the fact that the space and the content in the universe, as well
+as the Simplification- or Mathematically- or Reductionistically- caused
+reaction to understand the ontology of other observers (which doesn\'t
+ever happen fully) with one or more other observers, have a negative
+effect on the observer's mental health and sensation, and therefore the
+observer becomes inclined to improve their own mental health, and
+improve their own sensation. (these two things are basically the same
+thing.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Universe (Space and Content) comes about as an attribute of the observer
+(or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Awareness of How to Produce Space and Content comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+Space And Content comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Observer-Caused Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Causation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+A consequence comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
+or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Causation consequence loops come about as an attribute of the observer
+(or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+The foundational aspects of a universe that would appear to be time
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to
+"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
+the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
+call in computer programming).
+
+Events come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Games come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Freedom comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Barriers come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Purposes come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Numbers (Between Numberness and Concrete Numbers in concreteness) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
+is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+Concrete Details come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
+or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Concrete Numbers come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
+or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Concrete Sequence (Numbers need to have a sequence) comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+Time (a real ontological thing, not just an idea, this exists on the
+basis of a sequence or sequences) comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
+as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Time Streams (a real, ontological stream of time exists, but maybe not
+inside of the physical universe) comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
+as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Reset Time (Since events, games, ontological time, and ontological time
+streams have partly come into existence and are in the process of coming
+into existence, higher-level factors could reset concrete sequences back
+to previous states. This is called \"Reset Time\" because Time could be
+thought to reset. It would be an arbitrary statement to say that time
+cannot go back. Since games partly exist, the \"dial\" of the procession
+of time, the \"variable\" in a C struct, is simply given a lower value,
+if higher level factors dictate it. It would suck to have time be
+resetting all the time. All personal, \"permanent\" progress would be
+lost. For one to avoid this, one would need to try to control the higher
+level factor which would be leading to this. Simply by one exerting
+individual influence and by being POTENTIALLY influential or dangerous
+to existence and these various factors, one could exert control.
+Relation comes into existence before this factor (see above). Therefore,
+things are related, in as many ways as possible, and one can exert
+influence. If JoJo Siwa were a potential threat to the human race and
+wished Death Threats to Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, and was willing to
+turn her young fanbase into a cult with greater zeal and fervor than
+QAnon, those factors related to JoJo Siwa and those factors trying to
+paint JoJo Siwa as an innocent, innocuous, harmless, young girl, would
+start to compete with each other like crazy and would start to do what
+they could to control JoJo Siwa more, even though they couldn\'t. Their
+\"alternatives\" could be shooting her, but that would produce an even
+bigger problem. Those factors would get stimulated like hell and would
+begin to act differently. They would act in an \"appropriate\", \"not
+corrupt\", \"sensible\", \"liberal\", and \"politically correct\" way.
+So, if she becomes more dangerous to an environment which is already
+dangerous, she could produce tremendous influence and increase
+discourse. Intelligence agencies could spend a lot of time trying to
+sway her action in a direction that \"they like\". Any controlling
+factors would start altering significantly their course of action,
+including negative courses of action. Controlling factors might be
+parents, friends, bosses, police, AI, perhaps aliens, perhaps
+other-dimensional players. Many, many factors, right now, regardless of
+whether or not there are aliens or whether or not Jesus or Lucifer
+exist, do certainly care about YOUR future and the outcome of YOUR life.
+Police care, governments care. Assuming that a dystopian condition of
+\"Reset Time\" does exist, there are ways of overcoming it. It would
+depend upon being very dangerous and being very willing to communicate
+and to being very willing to communicate philosophical statements to
+people. Look at how dangerous Karl Marx was. Imagine if JoJo Siwa or
+Olivia Rodrigo or Sabrina Carpenter were that dangerous. Imagine of
+Chinese pop stars stated \"Practice Falun Dafa everyone!!! Democracy for
+all!!! Death to the Chinese Communist Party!\" An effective way by which
+one could exert influence, would be to befriend celebrities. That is
+much easier than one becoming a celebrity oneself. Then, one could get
+that celebrity to communicate about a certain ideology. The trick is,
+one should make that celebrity extremely, extremely dangerous. Get them
+to sing about a certain ideology, but do it in a way that makes them
+legitimately dangerous. John Lennon wasn\'t dangerous to anyone. Michael
+Jackson might have been, but he wasn\'t assassinated. Same with Donald
+Trump. Same with Barack Obama. The only people who get assassinated are
+weak people. Abraham Lincoln was chronically depressed, he was of weak
+character and was an obvious target. Obvious targets will get
+assassinated, but important people are never obvious targets. Just
+because something bad could happen, doesn\'t mean that it has to happen
+or will happen, otherwise, we would be living in a nuclear fallout right
+now. There is a 1,000 page document of incredible detail, which, I
+should be clear, I am not supporting and the name and author of which I
+am not stating that suggests that people might have been living in time
+loops. I don\'t believe that this dystopian condition is the case
+anymore, and I don\'t think that this something to worry about, but
+supposedly there was a time reset about 60 years ago, after a nuclear
+war in the height of the Cold War. This would make sense. If there were
+too much of an ontological shift, then some high level factor might
+reset the sequence that would comprise the state of the time stream;
+however, the author of that book was not in control, nor was he strong,
+clever, influential or effective, nor was he unique and he died,
+ostensibly a suicide, but quite possibly a murder. He was not strong in
+character, and he was needlessly criticizing his own personal faith, and
+he didn't provide methods to Try to overcome Reset Time (which I believe
+has since been overcome after the death of this individual; ironically
+his initials were KO.) The most effective way to make a celebrity your
+friend, would be to make them fall in love with you, and, failing that,
+one could Try to make them fall in love with someone else you know. One
+could meet them at meet and greets, or other places. This might be
+extremely important for maintaining (or establishing) peace and freedom.
+) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to
+"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
+the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
+call in computer programming).
+
+Time Loops come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Space (or space-time) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Other content (high level content, e.g., a high level version of matter
+and energy, before the physical universe comes into existence) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
+is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+Commentary: all possible relations happen between concrete details.
+Concrete details would include such things as the physical universe, and
+it would also include such things as wombs, many-dimensional games, and
+all sorts of interesting phenomena that would exist around the physical
+universe.)
+
+Relation of all \"concrete\" details (Before this point, there was no
+relation of concrete details, hence no gravity, quantum entanglement, or
+anything else that will come into existence, or come into apparent
+existence, later) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Implications of relations of all \"concrete\" details (high level
+gravity, high level quantum entanglement) comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in
+order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+Consistency of behavior of physical universe in physical universe space
+surrounding physical universe (gravity, quantum mechanics, etc.) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
+is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
+Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
+are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).
+
+Concrete details surrounding physical universe comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+A separating mark that would demark the physical universe as being
+separate, at least in part, from other ontological units (big bang,
+etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Commentary: People put so much emphasis on, put so much money towards,
+put so much propaganda towards, caring about a big bang and creating a
+"grand degrading narrative", that people lose touch of the big picture,
+and start arrogantly making claims like that there "is" or "is not" a
+God, deities, etc., etc.
+
+People should just employ reason and not degrade each other.
+
+Such fixation has been put on an idea of a big bang.
+
+Such denialism has been put on the possibility of other factors that
+might exist as well.
+
+Without all of the factors preceding this point, a big bang cannot
+exist.
+
+A Big Bang is more like Step 1,000,000 in the process.
+
+An ontological unit of some kind demarks the physical universe from
+other ontological units.
+
+Only now in the process, does the physical universe exist.
+
+Galaxies come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
+god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Celestial bodies (stars, planets, asteroids, etc.) come about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+The Milky Way galaxy as we know it in the present time comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+The solar system as we know it comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
+as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+The planets of the solar system as we know them come about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+The Earth as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Life as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Tribes and cliques as we know them come about as an attribute of the
+observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
+as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+Individual subtribes and cliques (China, Britain, France, U.S.A. and
+many other groups of human beings) as we know them come about as an
+attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
+this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).
+
+Homo Sapiens as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer
+(or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
+the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
+it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+
+After that, things can appear to exist, like a chair or a tree. All of
+the fundamental ontological steps have been covered.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[First article](1.html)
+:::