RubyGems - foundational_lib2 - Versions diffs - 1.0 - Mend

foundational_lib2 1.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (529) hide show

data/Articles/16.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,908 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="utf-8">
+<title>Epistemology</title>
+</head>
+<body>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+<h2>There's no fucking way in hell that the mainstream engineering
+establishment would converse about this epistemology &ndash; I have tried
+for 5 years.</h2>
+<h2>Eventually, this will get talked about.</h2>
+<div style='text-align: center'>
+<h1>In the beginning, there is</h1>
+</div>
+<p>* Existence (no self-ontology)</p>
+<p>* Concreteness (no self-ontology)</p>
+<p>* Anti-existence (anti-ontology [for others and self too, not
+relevant, no self-ontology])</p>
+<p>* Anti-concreteness (anti-ontology [for others and self too, not
+relevant, no self-ontology])</p>
+<p>All of these attributes have no ontology. They don’t exist.</p>
+<p>They are attributes, but they are not attributes of anything
+that exists.</p>
+<p>It is possible that other attributes are also present in the
+beginning, but they are not relevant and it wouldn’t matter if they
+were present or not.</p>
+<p>Anti-existence and anti-concreteness both work, but are super
+vague.</p>
+<p>They both fail at their goals, leading to both existence and
+concreteness.</p>
+<p>Therefore something that has ontological existence comes into
+existence for the first time, with extremely low (possibly
+infinitesimal concreteness).</p>
+<p>In trying to make things not exist in the most abstract and
+poorly defined way, and in trying to get things not to be concrete
+in the most abstract and poorly defined way, they make something
+exist.</p>
+<p>This is Numbers or “numberness” or “numbernessness,” etc. in
+probably the most abstract or one of the most abstract ways
+possible.</p>
+<p>Numberness combined with the super-abstract anti-existence and
+anti-concreteness again fail to interact and produce
+positionness.</p>
+<p>Positionness again fails to interact with those things and
+produces positions, multiple positions that have ontological
+significance. Probably a very large number of positions would be
+produced.</p>
+<p>Positionness interacting with those things produces
+groupness.</p>
+<p>Groupness interacts with those two things, which Try to remove
+the groupness from existence.</p>
+<p>Those things fail, and produce the content of groups, in
+probably a very abstract way.</p>
+<p>In the production of the content of groups, the following things
+happen.</p>
+<p>Elimination necessitation</p>
+<p>Firstly, to appease “The Eliminator” (a synonym for
+Simplification, Reductionism, Mathematics,</p>
+<p>Destructionism or Elimination, all of which are synonymous), the
+relationship between the two or more “things” needs to be defined
+clearly and explicitly. To do this, one requisite is that there
+needs to be a set, singular ordering of the two or more “things,”
+no going back, no changing. The “things” go in a specific
+order.</p>
+<p>Therefore | The ordering gets established, perhaps arbitrarily,
+in line with the way that “The Eliminator” does it.</p>
+<p>Elimination necessitation | But the ordering can't be justified
+to the Eliminator as making sense, without an observer. The
+observer would have the effect of validating and justifying the
+rather arbitrary ordering. To the observer, the ordering is the
+proper ordering, and no other ordering would be proper.</p>
+<p>Therefore | An observer comes about, first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness, of the validity of the ordering comes about, in order
+to justify the ordering to The Eliminator (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing) first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming)</p>
+<p>Awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in order
+to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>(Commentary: Spinoza, a man accused of as being an atheist,
+believed that everything was “mind.” This is called idealism in
+philosophy, an idea that is not necessarily a religious one, and
+not necessarily a superstitious one. This is where “mind” would
+first come about. Later in the process, “mental health” comes about
+as well. This would be necessary for “mind.”)</p>
+<p>Awareness of awareness comes about as an attribute of the
+observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: The observer is also aware that they are aware.</p>
+<p>An incessant extension of the ordering comes about, as a
+“background process,” if you will, to make the ordering not be
+finite, and therefore make sense.</p>
+<p>Each next item is one greater than the previous item.</p>
+<p>First this happens partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
+call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>There is an alteration of the awareness of the observer; the
+amount of awareness has new ontological attributes of itself come
+about as attributes of the observer, in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary:</p>
+<p>Therefore | it could appear as if there were such things as
+“moments,” to the observer.</p>
+<p>Therefore | it could appear as if there were “time,” to the
+observer.</p>
+<p>Commentary: For the observer to validate the ordering, the
+observer would need to be able to “agree”</p>
+<p>with sequential things, and “disagree” with nonsequential
+things. For the observer to agree with a state with its awareness,
+it needs to experience sensation.</p>
+<p>9) Thus sensation comes about.</p>
+<p>Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>“Mental health” comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of unitness of observer (Unitness means the condition
+of being “one thing”).</p>
+<p>(Commentary: being aware that other observers exist, does not
+make them exist, does not make numbers exist, does not make them
+concrete and does not make numbers concrete. [Nor does it make
+numerals concrete. None of these things exist yet. The other
+observers may or may not be aware yet. The other observers may or
+may not be aware that they are aware yet.)</p>
+<p>Awareness of other observers (non-concrete, non-ontological)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of separateness of other observers (non-ontological)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>——————————————————————————————</p>
+<p>After awareness of the validity of the ordering fully comes
+about, and all of the aforementioned steps happen as well, the
+following things happen</p>
+<p>Awareness of existence (the high-level attribute, no ontology)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of concreteness (high level attribute, no ontology)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of concreteness of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness that concreteness of ordering is nonzero (greater than
+zero) (Concreteness != 0 or Concreteness &gt; 0, Concreteness could
+not be negative) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Once those previous 5 steps fully happen, the following starts
+to happen</p>
+<p>(Awareness then begins to come into existence in other ways that
+doesn’t only have to do with the ordering.</p>
+<p>This is very, very interesting.)</p>
+<p>Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>(Commentary: Now that there is 1) awareness, 2) self-awareness,
+3) awareness of others, their unitness and separateness and 4)
+awareness of the ordering, awareness of others starts to be defined
+more accurately, since awareness is early in this simplificational
+definition sequence, as listed above. This begins with the
+following)</p>
+<p>Awareness of Awareness of Awareness — the awareness of (another
+observer’s) awareness of awareness— comes about, in order to
+justify an observer’s Awareness of Awareness as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness — the awareness
+of (another observer’s) awareness of (an ordering’s own, to self)
+awareness of awareness — comes about, in order to justify an
+observer’s Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and
+sensation, since awareness depends on mental health and sensation,
+which in effect are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness (5
+“awareness”es)– awareness of (ones own; to self) awareness of the
+awareness of (another’s) awareness of (one’s own; to self)
+awareness of awareness — comes about, in order to justify an
+observer’s own Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health
+and sensation, since awareness depends on mental health and
+sensation, which in effect are synonymous) as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: 5 awarenesses are all that are necessary. Awareness
+of self-awareness is basically the same thing as self-awareness.
+This process doesn’t need to go on forever.</p>
+<p>Emotion, in order to experience the sensation of agreement comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>An attempt to gain awareness of ontological existence of other
+observers comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>(Commentary, a little bit of a tangent, but bear with me: The
+attempt fails, which results in the following. It is not necessary
+that the “failure” be ontological. But the attempt doesn’t work.
+Also, the ontological existence of the other observers may not may
+not be concrete yet, depending on the other observer. This the
+first and only true Communication between observers [beings] and is
+the only reason things, such as Barack Obama or a chair or a
+universe seem to exist.</p>
+<p>Spinoza said that everything is “mind.” This “mind” would come
+about when “awareness” comes about. Spinoza believed that higher
+factors don’t influence lower-level factors. I don’t necessarily
+agree with this view, and Spinoza’s claim is unproven. On the basis
+of reason and logic and mathematics alone, this book might prove
+the opposite.</p>
+<p>Spinoza was considered an Atheist in his day (even though this
+is kind of not true).</p>
+<p>Sense channel awareness come about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Emotional Levels come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>An Emotional Spectrum comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of the attempt to improve mental health of observer
+(being), due to the fact that the space and the content in the
+universe, as well as the Simplification- or Mathematically- or
+Reductionistically- caused reaction to understand the ontology of
+other observers (which doesn't ever happen fully) with one or more
+other observers, have a negative effect on the observer’s mental
+health and sensation, and therefore the observer becomes inclined
+to improve their own mental health, and improve their own
+sensation. (these two things are basically the same thing.) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Universe (Space and Content) comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of How to Produce Space and Content comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Space And Content comes about as an attribute of the observer
+(or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as
+life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order
+to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Observer-Caused Action comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Causation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>A consequence comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Causation consequence loops come about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>The foundational aspects of a universe that would appear to be
+time comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).</p>
+<p>Events come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Games come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).</p>
+<p>Freedom comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Barriers come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Purposes come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Numbers (Between Numberness and Concrete Numbers in
+concreteness) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete Details come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete Numbers come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete Sequence (Numbers need to have a sequence) comes about
+as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Time (a real ontological thing, not just an idea, this exists on
+the basis of a sequence or sequences) comes about as an attribute
+of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Time Streams (a real, ontological stream of time exists, but
+maybe not inside of the physical universe) comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Reset Time (Since events, games, ontological time, and
+ontological time streams have partly come into existence and are in
+the process of coming into existence, higher-level factors could
+reset concrete sequences back to previous states. This is called
+“Reset Time” because Time could be thought to reset. It would be an
+arbitrary statement to say that time cannot go back. Since games
+partly exist, the “dial” of the procession of time, the “variable”
+in a C struct, is simply given a lower value, if higher level
+factors dictate it. It would suck to have time be resetting all the
+time. All personal, “permanent” progress would be lost. For one to
+avoid this, one would need to try to control the higher level
+factor which would be leading to this. Simply by one exerting
+individual influence and by being POTENTIALLY influential or
+dangerous to existence and these various factors, one could exert
+control. Relation comes into existence before this factor (see
+above). Therefore, things are related, in as many ways as possible,
+and one can exert influence. If JoJo Siwa were a potential threat
+to the human race and wished Death Threats to Xi Jinping and Donald
+Trump, and was willing to turn her young fanbase into a cult with
+greater zeal and fervor than QAnon, those factors related to JoJo
+Siwa and those factors trying to paint JoJo Siwa as an innocent,
+innocuous, harmless, young girl, would start to compete with each
+other like crazy and would start to do what they could to control
+JoJo Siwa more, even though they couldn't. Their “alternatives”
+could be shooting her, but that would produce an even bigger
+problem. Those factors would get stimulated like hell and would
+begin to act differently. They would act in an “appropriate,” "not
+corrupt", “sensible,” “liberal,” and “politically correct” way. So,
+if she becomes more dangerous to an environment which is already
+dangerous, she could produce tremendous influence and increase
+discourse. Intelligence agencies could spend a lot of time trying
+to sway her action in a direction that “they like.” Any controlling
+factors would start altering significantly their course of action,
+including negative courses of action. Controlling factors might be
+parents, friends, bosses, police, AI, perhaps aliens, perhaps
+other-dimensional players. Many, many factors, right now,
+regardless of whether or not there are aliens or whether or not
+Jesus or Lucifer exist, do certainly care about YOUR future and the
+outcome of YOUR life. Police care, governments care. Assuming that
+a dystopian condition of “Reset Time” does exist, there are ways of
+overcoming it. It would depend upon being very dangerous and being
+very willing to communicate and to being very willing to
+communicate philosophical statements to people. Look at how
+dangerous Karl Marx was. Imagine if JoJo Siwa or Olivia Rodrigo or
+Sabrina Carpenter were that dangerous. Imagine of Chinese pop stars
+stated "Practice Falun Dafa everyone!!! Democracy for all!!! Death
+to the Chinese Communist Party!" An effective way by which one
+could exert influence, would be to befriend celebrities. That is
+much easier than one becoming a celebrity oneself. Then, one could
+get that celebrity to communicate about a certain ideology. The
+trick is, one should make that celebrity extremely, extremely
+dangerous. Get them to sing about a certain ideology, but do it in
+a way that makes them legitimately dangerous. John Lennon wasn't
+dangerous to anyone. Michael Jackson might have been, but he wasn't
+assassinated. Same with Donald Trump. Same with Barack Obama. The
+only people who get assassinated are weak people. Abraham Lincoln
+was chronically depressed, he was of weak character and was an
+obvious target. Obvious targets will get assassinated, but
+important people are never obvious targets. Just because something
+bad could happen, doesn't mean that it has to happen or will
+happen, otherwise, we would be living in a nuclear fallout right
+now. There is a 1,000 page document of incredible detail, which, I
+should be clear, I am not supporting and the name and author of
+which I am not stating that suggests that people might have been
+living in time loops. I don't believe that this dystopian condition
+is the case anymore, and I don't think that this something to worry
+about, but supposedly there was a time reset about 60 years ago,
+after a nuclear war in the height of the Cold War. This would make
+sense. If there were too much of an ontological shift, then some
+high level factor might reset the sequence that would comprise the
+state of the time stream; however, the author of that book was not
+in control, nor was he strong, clever, influential or effective,
+nor was he unique and he died, ostensibly a suicide, but quite
+possibly a murder. He was not strong in character, and he was
+needlessly criticizing his own personal faith, and he didn’t
+provide methods to Try to overcome Reset Time (which I believe has
+since been overcome after the death of this individual; ironically
+his initials were KO.) The most effective way to make a celebrity
+your friend, would be to make them fall in love with you, and,
+failing that, one could Try to make them fall in love with someone
+else you know. One could meet them at meet and greets, or other
+places. This might be extremely important for maintaining (or
+establishing) peace and freedom. ) comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Time Loops come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Space (or space-time) comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Other content (high level content, e.g., a high level version of
+matter and energy, before the physical universe comes into
+existence) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: all possible relations happen between concrete
+details. Concrete details would include such things as the physical
+universe, and it would also include such things as wombs,
+many-dimensional games, and all sorts of interesting phenomena that
+would exist around the physical universe.)</p>
+<p>Relation of all “concrete” details (Before this point, there was
+no relation of concrete details, hence no gravity, quantum
+entanglement, or anything else that will come into existence, or
+come into apparent existence, later) comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Implications of relations of all “concrete” details (high level
+gravity, high level quantum entanglement) comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Consistency of behavior of physical universe in physical
+universe space surrounding physical universe (gravity, quantum
+mechanics, etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete details surrounding physical universe comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>A separating mark that would demark the physical universe as
+being separate, at least in part, from other ontological units (big
+bang, etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: People put so much emphasis on, put so much money
+towards, put so much propaganda towards, caring about a big bang
+and creating a “grand degrading narrative,” that people lose touch
+of the big picture, and start arrogantly making claims like that
+there “is” or “is not” a God, deities, etc., etc.</p>
+<p>People should just employ reason and not degrade each other.</p>
+<p>Such fixation has been put on an idea of a big bang.</p>
+<p>Such denialism has been put on the possibility of other factors
+that might exist as well.</p>
+<p>Without all of the factors preceding this point, a big bang
+cannot exist.</p>
+<p>A Big Bang is more like Step 1,000,000 in the process.</p>
+<p>An ontological unit of some kind demarks the physical universe
+from other ontological units.</p>
+<p>Only now in the process, does the physical universe exist.</p>
+<p>Galaxies come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Celestial bodies (stars, planets, asteroids, etc.) come about as
+an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether
+or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The Milky Way galaxy as we know it in the present time comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The solar system as we know it comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The planets of the solar system as we know them come about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The Earth as we know it comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Life as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer
+(or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as
+life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order
+to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Tribes and cliques as we know them come about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Individual subtribes and cliques (China, Britain, France, U.S.A.
+and many other groups of human beings) as we know them come about
+as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Homo Sapiens as we know it comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<div style="text-align: center">
+	<p>After that, things can appear to exist, like a chair or a tree.
+	All of the fundamental ontological steps have been covered.</p>
+</div><div class='article_link'><a href="15.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="index.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>