decision_agent 0.3.0 → 1.0.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- checksums.yaml +4 -4
- data/README.md +272 -7
- data/lib/decision_agent/agent.rb +72 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/context.rb +1 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/cache/memory_adapter.rb +86 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/cache_adapter.rb +49 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/circuit_breaker.rb +135 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/client.rb +220 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/config.rb +78 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/errors.rb +36 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/decision.rb +102 -2
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/evaluator.rb +28 -6
- data/lib/decision_agent/dsl/condition_evaluator.rb +982 -839
- data/lib/decision_agent/dsl/schema_validator.rb +51 -13
- data/lib/decision_agent/evaluators/dmn_evaluator.rb +106 -19
- data/lib/decision_agent/evaluators/json_rule_evaluator.rb +69 -9
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/condition_trace.rb +83 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/explainability_result.rb +52 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/rule_trace.rb +39 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/trace_collector.rb +24 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/monitoring/alert_manager.rb +5 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/errors.rb +18 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/impact_analyzer.rb +498 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/monte_carlo_simulator.rb +635 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/replay_engine.rb +486 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/scenario_engine.rb +318 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/scenario_library.rb +163 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/shadow_test_engine.rb +287 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/what_if_analyzer.rb +1002 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation.rb +17 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/version.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/versioning/activerecord_adapter.rb +23 -8
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/app.js +119 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/index.html +49 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation.html +130 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_impact.html +478 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_replay.html +551 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_shadow.html +546 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_whatif.html +532 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/styles.css +65 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/server.rb +594 -23
- data/lib/decision_agent.rb +60 -2
- metadata +53 -73
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_assignment_spec.rb +0 -253
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_manager_spec.rb +0 -612
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_spec.rb +0 -270
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_testing_agent_spec.rb +0 -655
- data/spec/ab_testing/storage/adapter_spec.rb +0 -64
- data/spec/ab_testing/storage/memory_adapter_spec.rb +0 -485
- data/spec/activerecord_thread_safety_spec.rb +0 -553
- data/spec/advanced_operators_spec.rb +0 -3150
- data/spec/agent_spec.rb +0 -289
- data/spec/api_contract_spec.rb +0 -430
- data/spec/audit_adapters_spec.rb +0 -92
- data/spec/auth/access_audit_logger_spec.rb +0 -394
- data/spec/auth/authenticator_spec.rb +0 -112
- data/spec/auth/password_reset_spec.rb +0 -294
- data/spec/auth/permission_checker_spec.rb +0 -207
- data/spec/auth/permission_spec.rb +0 -73
- data/spec/auth/rbac_adapter_spec.rb +0 -778
- data/spec/auth/rbac_config_spec.rb +0 -82
- data/spec/auth/role_spec.rb +0 -51
- data/spec/auth/session_manager_spec.rb +0 -172
- data/spec/auth/session_spec.rb +0 -112
- data/spec/auth/user_spec.rb +0 -130
- data/spec/comprehensive_edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -1777
- data/spec/context_spec.rb +0 -127
- data/spec/decision_agent_spec.rb +0 -96
- data/spec/decision_spec.rb +0 -423
- data/spec/dmn/decision_graph_spec.rb +0 -282
- data/spec/dmn/decision_tree_spec.rb +0 -203
- data/spec/dmn/feel/errors_spec.rb +0 -18
- data/spec/dmn/feel/functions_spec.rb +0 -400
- data/spec/dmn/feel/simple_parser_spec.rb +0 -274
- data/spec/dmn/feel/types_spec.rb +0 -176
- data/spec/dmn/feel_parser_spec.rb +0 -489
- data/spec/dmn/hit_policy_spec.rb +0 -202
- data/spec/dmn/integration_spec.rb +0 -226
- data/spec/dsl/condition_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -774
- data/spec/dsl_validation_spec.rb +0 -648
- data/spec/edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -353
- data/spec/evaluation_spec.rb +0 -364
- data/spec/evaluation_validator_spec.rb +0 -165
- data/spec/examples/feedback_aware_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -460
- data/spec/examples.txt +0 -1909
- data/spec/fixtures/dmn/complex_decision.dmn +0 -81
- data/spec/fixtures/dmn/invalid_structure.dmn +0 -31
- data/spec/fixtures/dmn/simple_decision.dmn +0 -40
- data/spec/issue_verification_spec.rb +0 -759
- data/spec/json_rule_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -587
- data/spec/monitoring/alert_manager_spec.rb +0 -378
- data/spec/monitoring/metrics_collector_spec.rb +0 -501
- data/spec/monitoring/monitored_agent_spec.rb +0 -225
- data/spec/monitoring/prometheus_exporter_spec.rb +0 -242
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/activerecord_adapter_spec.rb +0 -498
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/base_adapter_spec.rb +0 -61
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/memory_adapter_spec.rb +0 -247
- data/spec/performance_optimizations_spec.rb +0 -493
- data/spec/replay_edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -699
- data/spec/replay_spec.rb +0 -210
- data/spec/rfc8785_canonicalization_spec.rb +0 -215
- data/spec/scoring_spec.rb +0 -225
- data/spec/spec_helper.rb +0 -60
- data/spec/testing/batch_test_importer_spec.rb +0 -693
- data/spec/testing/batch_test_runner_spec.rb +0 -307
- data/spec/testing/test_coverage_analyzer_spec.rb +0 -292
- data/spec/testing/test_result_comparator_spec.rb +0 -392
- data/spec/testing/test_scenario_spec.rb +0 -113
- data/spec/thread_safety_spec.rb +0 -490
- data/spec/thread_safety_spec.rb.broken +0 -878
- data/spec/versioning/adapter_spec.rb +0 -156
- data/spec/versioning_spec.rb +0 -1030
- data/spec/web/middleware/auth_middleware_spec.rb +0 -133
- data/spec/web/middleware/permission_middleware_spec.rb +0 -247
- data/spec/web_ui_rack_spec.rb +0 -2134
|
@@ -1,307 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
require "spec_helper"
|
|
2
|
-
require "tempfile"
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
4
|
-
RSpec.describe DecisionAgent::Testing::BatchTestRunner do
|
|
5
|
-
let(:evaluator) { DecisionAgent::Evaluators::StaticEvaluator.new(decision: "approve", weight: 1.0) }
|
|
6
|
-
let(:agent) { DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator]) }
|
|
7
|
-
let(:runner) { DecisionAgent::Testing::BatchTestRunner.new(agent) }
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
describe "#initialize" do
|
|
10
|
-
it "creates a batch test runner with an agent" do
|
|
11
|
-
expect(runner.agent).to eq(agent)
|
|
12
|
-
expect(runner.results).to eq([])
|
|
13
|
-
end
|
|
14
|
-
end
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
describe "#run" do
|
|
17
|
-
let(:scenarios) do
|
|
18
|
-
[
|
|
19
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(
|
|
20
|
-
id: "test_1",
|
|
21
|
-
context: { user_id: 123 }
|
|
22
|
-
),
|
|
23
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(
|
|
24
|
-
id: "test_2",
|
|
25
|
-
context: { user_id: 456 }
|
|
26
|
-
)
|
|
27
|
-
]
|
|
28
|
-
end
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
it "executes test scenarios sequentially" do
|
|
31
|
-
results = runner.run(scenarios, parallel: false)
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(2)
|
|
34
|
-
expect(results.all?(&:success?)).to be true
|
|
35
|
-
expect(results[0].decision).to eq("approve")
|
|
36
|
-
expect(results[1].decision).to eq("approve")
|
|
37
|
-
end
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
it "executes test scenarios in parallel when enabled" do
|
|
40
|
-
results = runner.run(scenarios, parallel: true, thread_count: 2)
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(2)
|
|
43
|
-
expect(results.all?(&:success?)).to be true
|
|
44
|
-
end
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
it "executes single scenario sequentially even with parallel enabled" do
|
|
47
|
-
single_scenario = [scenarios[0]]
|
|
48
|
-
results = runner.run(single_scenario, parallel: true)
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(1)
|
|
51
|
-
expect(results.all?(&:success?)).to be true
|
|
52
|
-
end
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
it "handles empty scenarios array" do
|
|
55
|
-
results = runner.run([])
|
|
56
|
-
expect(results).to eq([])
|
|
57
|
-
end
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
it "calls progress callback during execution" do
|
|
60
|
-
progress_updates = []
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
runner.run(scenarios, progress_callback: lambda { |progress|
|
|
63
|
-
progress_updates << progress
|
|
64
|
-
})
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
expect(progress_updates.size).to be >= 2
|
|
67
|
-
expect(progress_updates.last[:completed]).to eq(2)
|
|
68
|
-
expect(progress_updates.last[:total]).to eq(2)
|
|
69
|
-
expect(progress_updates.last[:percentage]).to eq(100.0)
|
|
70
|
-
end
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
it "tracks execution time for each scenario" do
|
|
73
|
-
results = runner.run(scenarios)
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
results.each do |result|
|
|
76
|
-
expect(result.execution_time_ms).to be >= 0
|
|
77
|
-
expect(result.execution_time_ms).to be_a(Numeric)
|
|
78
|
-
end
|
|
79
|
-
end
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
it "handles errors gracefully" do
|
|
82
|
-
# Create an agent that will raise an error
|
|
83
|
-
error_evaluator = Class.new do
|
|
84
|
-
def evaluate(_context, _feedback: {})
|
|
85
|
-
raise StandardError, "Test error"
|
|
86
|
-
end
|
|
87
|
-
end.new
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
error_agent = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [error_evaluator])
|
|
90
|
-
error_runner = DecisionAgent::Testing::BatchTestRunner.new(error_agent)
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
results = error_runner.run(scenarios)
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(2)
|
|
95
|
-
expect(results.none?(&:success?)).to be true
|
|
96
|
-
expect(results[0].error).to be_a(StandardError)
|
|
97
|
-
end
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
it "passes feedback to agent" do
|
|
100
|
-
feedback = { source: "batch_test" }
|
|
101
|
-
results = runner.run(scenarios, feedback: feedback)
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(2)
|
|
104
|
-
expect(results.all?(&:success?)).to be true
|
|
105
|
-
end
|
|
106
|
-
end
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
describe "#statistics" do
|
|
109
|
-
it "returns empty hash when no results" do
|
|
110
|
-
expect(runner.statistics).to eq({})
|
|
111
|
-
end
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
it "calculates statistics from results" do
|
|
114
|
-
scenarios = [
|
|
115
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_1", context: { user_id: 123 }),
|
|
116
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_2", context: { user_id: 456 })
|
|
117
|
-
]
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
runner.run(scenarios)
|
|
120
|
-
stats = runner.statistics
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
expect(stats[:total]).to eq(2)
|
|
123
|
-
expect(stats[:successful]).to eq(2)
|
|
124
|
-
expect(stats[:failed]).to eq(0)
|
|
125
|
-
expect(stats[:success_rate]).to eq(1.0)
|
|
126
|
-
expect(stats[:avg_execution_time_ms]).to be >= 0
|
|
127
|
-
expect(stats[:min_execution_time_ms]).to be >= 0
|
|
128
|
-
expect(stats[:max_execution_time_ms]).to be >= 0
|
|
129
|
-
end
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
it "handles nil execution times in statistics" do
|
|
132
|
-
scenarios = [
|
|
133
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_1", context: { user_id: 123 })
|
|
134
|
-
]
|
|
135
|
-
runner.run(scenarios)
|
|
136
|
-
|
|
137
|
-
# Manually add a result with nil execution time
|
|
138
|
-
runner.instance_variable_get(:@results) << DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
139
|
-
scenario_id: "test_2",
|
|
140
|
-
execution_time_ms: nil
|
|
141
|
-
)
|
|
142
|
-
|
|
143
|
-
stats = runner.statistics
|
|
144
|
-
expect(stats[:total]).to eq(2)
|
|
145
|
-
end
|
|
146
|
-
end
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
describe "#resume" do
|
|
149
|
-
let(:scenarios) do
|
|
150
|
-
[
|
|
151
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_1", context: { user_id: 123 }),
|
|
152
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_2", context: { user_id: 456 })
|
|
153
|
-
]
|
|
154
|
-
end
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
it "resumes from checkpoint file" do
|
|
157
|
-
checkpoint_file = Tempfile.new(["checkpoint", ".json"])
|
|
158
|
-
checkpoint_file.write(JSON.pretty_generate({ completed_scenario_ids: ["test_1"], last_updated: Time.now.to_i }))
|
|
159
|
-
checkpoint_file.close
|
|
160
|
-
|
|
161
|
-
results = runner.resume(scenarios, checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
162
|
-
|
|
163
|
-
# Should only run test_2 since test_1 is already completed
|
|
164
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(1)
|
|
165
|
-
expect(results[0].scenario_id).to eq("test_2")
|
|
166
|
-
|
|
167
|
-
checkpoint_file.unlink
|
|
168
|
-
end
|
|
169
|
-
end
|
|
170
|
-
|
|
171
|
-
describe "checkpoint functionality" do
|
|
172
|
-
let(:scenarios) do
|
|
173
|
-
[
|
|
174
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_1", context: { user_id: 123 }),
|
|
175
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestScenario.new(id: "test_2", context: { user_id: 456 })
|
|
176
|
-
]
|
|
177
|
-
end
|
|
178
|
-
|
|
179
|
-
it "saves checkpoints during execution" do
|
|
180
|
-
checkpoint_file = Tempfile.new(["checkpoint", ".json"])
|
|
181
|
-
checkpoint_file.close
|
|
182
|
-
File.delete(checkpoint_file.path) # Start with no file
|
|
183
|
-
|
|
184
|
-
runner.run(scenarios, checkpoint_file: checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
# Checkpoint file should exist and contain completed scenario IDs
|
|
187
|
-
expect(File.exist?(checkpoint_file.path)).to be false # Should be cleaned up after completion
|
|
188
|
-
end
|
|
189
|
-
|
|
190
|
-
it "handles checkpoint file errors gracefully" do
|
|
191
|
-
checkpoint_file = Tempfile.new(["checkpoint", ".json"])
|
|
192
|
-
checkpoint_file.close
|
|
193
|
-
|
|
194
|
-
# Make file read-only to cause write errors
|
|
195
|
-
File.chmod(0o444, checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
expect do
|
|
198
|
-
runner.run(scenarios, checkpoint_file: checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
199
|
-
end.not_to raise_error
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
# Clean up - file might have been deleted, so check first
|
|
202
|
-
if File.exist?(checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
203
|
-
File.chmod(0o644, checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
204
|
-
checkpoint_file.unlink
|
|
205
|
-
end
|
|
206
|
-
end
|
|
207
|
-
|
|
208
|
-
it "loads checkpoint data correctly" do
|
|
209
|
-
checkpoint_file = Tempfile.new(["checkpoint", ".json"])
|
|
210
|
-
checkpoint_data = {
|
|
211
|
-
completed_scenario_ids: ["test_1"],
|
|
212
|
-
last_updated: Time.now.to_i
|
|
213
|
-
}
|
|
214
|
-
checkpoint_file.write(JSON.pretty_generate(checkpoint_data))
|
|
215
|
-
checkpoint_file.close
|
|
216
|
-
|
|
217
|
-
results = runner.run(scenarios, checkpoint_file: checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
218
|
-
|
|
219
|
-
# Should only execute test_2
|
|
220
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(1)
|
|
221
|
-
expect(results[0].scenario_id).to eq("test_2")
|
|
222
|
-
|
|
223
|
-
checkpoint_file.unlink
|
|
224
|
-
end
|
|
225
|
-
|
|
226
|
-
it "handles invalid JSON in checkpoint file" do
|
|
227
|
-
checkpoint_file = Tempfile.new(["checkpoint", ".json"])
|
|
228
|
-
checkpoint_file.write("invalid json")
|
|
229
|
-
checkpoint_file.close
|
|
230
|
-
|
|
231
|
-
# Should handle gracefully and start fresh
|
|
232
|
-
results = runner.run(scenarios, checkpoint_file: checkpoint_file.path)
|
|
233
|
-
expect(results.size).to eq(2)
|
|
234
|
-
|
|
235
|
-
checkpoint_file.unlink
|
|
236
|
-
end
|
|
237
|
-
end
|
|
238
|
-
|
|
239
|
-
describe "TestResult" do
|
|
240
|
-
let(:result) do
|
|
241
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
242
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
243
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
244
|
-
confidence: 0.95,
|
|
245
|
-
execution_time_ms: 10.5
|
|
246
|
-
)
|
|
247
|
-
end
|
|
248
|
-
|
|
249
|
-
it "creates a successful test result" do
|
|
250
|
-
expect(result.success?).to be true
|
|
251
|
-
expect(result.scenario_id).to eq("test_1")
|
|
252
|
-
expect(result.decision).to eq("approve")
|
|
253
|
-
expect(result.confidence).to eq(0.95)
|
|
254
|
-
expect(result.execution_time_ms).to eq(10.5)
|
|
255
|
-
end
|
|
256
|
-
|
|
257
|
-
it "creates a failed test result" do
|
|
258
|
-
error = StandardError.new("Test error")
|
|
259
|
-
failed_result = DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
260
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
261
|
-
error: error
|
|
262
|
-
)
|
|
263
|
-
|
|
264
|
-
expect(failed_result.success?).to be false
|
|
265
|
-
expect(failed_result.error).to eq(error)
|
|
266
|
-
end
|
|
267
|
-
|
|
268
|
-
it "converts to hash" do
|
|
269
|
-
hash = result.to_h
|
|
270
|
-
|
|
271
|
-
expect(hash[:scenario_id]).to eq("test_1")
|
|
272
|
-
expect(hash[:decision]).to eq("approve")
|
|
273
|
-
expect(hash[:confidence]).to eq(0.95)
|
|
274
|
-
expect(hash[:execution_time_ms]).to eq(10.5)
|
|
275
|
-
expect(hash[:success]).to be true
|
|
276
|
-
end
|
|
277
|
-
|
|
278
|
-
it "includes evaluations in hash" do
|
|
279
|
-
evaluation = DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
280
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
281
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
282
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
283
|
-
evaluator_name: "TestEvaluator"
|
|
284
|
-
)
|
|
285
|
-
result_with_eval = DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
286
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
287
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
288
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation]
|
|
289
|
-
)
|
|
290
|
-
|
|
291
|
-
hash = result_with_eval.to_h
|
|
292
|
-
expect(hash[:evaluations]).to be_an(Array)
|
|
293
|
-
expect(hash[:evaluations].first).to respond_to(:to_h)
|
|
294
|
-
end
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
296
|
-
it "handles nil decision and confidence" do
|
|
297
|
-
result = DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
298
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
299
|
-
decision: nil,
|
|
300
|
-
confidence: nil
|
|
301
|
-
)
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
303
|
-
expect(result.decision).to be_nil
|
|
304
|
-
expect(result.confidence).to be_nil
|
|
305
|
-
end
|
|
306
|
-
end
|
|
307
|
-
end
|
|
@@ -1,292 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
require "spec_helper"
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
RSpec.describe DecisionAgent::Testing::TestCoverageAnalyzer do
|
|
4
|
-
let(:analyzer) { DecisionAgent::Testing::TestCoverageAnalyzer.new }
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
describe "#analyze" do
|
|
7
|
-
let(:evaluator) do
|
|
8
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::StaticEvaluator.new(decision: "approve", weight: 1.0)
|
|
9
|
-
# Add metadata to simulate rule_id
|
|
10
|
-
allow(evaluator).to receive(:evaluate).and_wrap_original do |method, context, **kwargs|
|
|
11
|
-
evaluation = method.call(context, **kwargs)
|
|
12
|
-
# Create a new evaluation with metadata
|
|
13
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
14
|
-
decision: evaluation.decision,
|
|
15
|
-
weight: evaluation.weight,
|
|
16
|
-
reason: evaluation.reason,
|
|
17
|
-
evaluator_name: evaluation.evaluator_name,
|
|
18
|
-
metadata: { rule_id: "rule_1", condition_id: "condition_1" }
|
|
19
|
-
)
|
|
20
|
-
end
|
|
21
|
-
evaluator
|
|
22
|
-
end
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
let(:agent) { DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator]) }
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
let(:results) do
|
|
27
|
-
[
|
|
28
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
29
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
30
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
31
|
-
confidence: 0.95,
|
|
32
|
-
evaluations: [
|
|
33
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
34
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
35
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
36
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
37
|
-
evaluator_name: "TestEvaluator",
|
|
38
|
-
metadata: { rule_id: "rule_1", condition_id: "condition_1" }
|
|
39
|
-
)
|
|
40
|
-
]
|
|
41
|
-
),
|
|
42
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
43
|
-
scenario_id: "test_2",
|
|
44
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
45
|
-
confidence: 0.90,
|
|
46
|
-
evaluations: [
|
|
47
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
48
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
49
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
50
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
51
|
-
evaluator_name: "TestEvaluator",
|
|
52
|
-
metadata: { rule_id: "rule_2", condition_id: "condition_2" }
|
|
53
|
-
)
|
|
54
|
-
]
|
|
55
|
-
)
|
|
56
|
-
]
|
|
57
|
-
end
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
it "analyzes coverage from test results" do
|
|
60
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(results, agent)
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
expect(report).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Testing::CoverageReport)
|
|
63
|
-
expect(report.covered_rules).to be >= 0
|
|
64
|
-
# Coverage percentage should be capped at 1.0
|
|
65
|
-
expect(report.coverage_percentage).to be <= 1.0
|
|
66
|
-
expect(report.coverage_percentage).to be >= 0.0
|
|
67
|
-
end
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
it "tracks executed rules" do
|
|
70
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(results, agent)
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
# Should have tracked at least some rules
|
|
73
|
-
expect(report.rule_coverage).to be_an(Array)
|
|
74
|
-
end
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
it "identifies untested rules when agent is provided" do
|
|
77
|
-
# Create agent with multiple evaluators
|
|
78
|
-
evaluator1 = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::StaticEvaluator.new(decision: "approve", weight: 1.0)
|
|
79
|
-
evaluator2 = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::StaticEvaluator.new(decision: "reject", weight: 1.0)
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
multi_agent = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator1, evaluator2])
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
# Results only exercise one rule
|
|
84
|
-
single_result = [
|
|
85
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
86
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
87
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
88
|
-
confidence: 0.95,
|
|
89
|
-
evaluations: [
|
|
90
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
91
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
92
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
93
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
94
|
-
evaluator_name: evaluator1.class.name,
|
|
95
|
-
metadata: { rule_id: "rule_1" }
|
|
96
|
-
)
|
|
97
|
-
]
|
|
98
|
-
)
|
|
99
|
-
]
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(single_result, multi_agent)
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
expect(report.total_rules).to be >= 1
|
|
104
|
-
expect(report.coverage_percentage).to be <= 1.0
|
|
105
|
-
end
|
|
106
|
-
|
|
107
|
-
it "handles agent with evaluators that have rules method" do
|
|
108
|
-
evaluator_with_rules = double("EvaluatorWithRules",
|
|
109
|
-
evaluate: nil,
|
|
110
|
-
rules: %w[rule_1 rule_2])
|
|
111
|
-
agent_with_rules = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator_with_rules])
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze([], agent_with_rules)
|
|
114
|
-
expect(report.total_rules).to be >= 2
|
|
115
|
-
end
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
it "handles agent with evaluators that have rule_id method" do
|
|
118
|
-
evaluator_with_rule_id = double("EvaluatorWithRuleId",
|
|
119
|
-
evaluate: nil,
|
|
120
|
-
rule_id: "my_rule_1")
|
|
121
|
-
agent_with_rule_id = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator_with_rule_id])
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze([], agent_with_rule_id)
|
|
124
|
-
expect(report.total_rules).to be >= 1
|
|
125
|
-
end
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
it "handles agent with evaluators that have conditions method" do
|
|
128
|
-
evaluator_with_conditions = double("EvaluatorWithConditions",
|
|
129
|
-
evaluate: nil,
|
|
130
|
-
conditions: %w[condition_1 condition_2])
|
|
131
|
-
agent_with_conditions = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator_with_conditions])
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze([], agent_with_conditions)
|
|
134
|
-
expect(report.condition_coverage).to be_an(Array)
|
|
135
|
-
end
|
|
136
|
-
|
|
137
|
-
it "handles agent with evaluators that have condition_id method" do
|
|
138
|
-
evaluator_with_condition_id = double("EvaluatorWithConditionId",
|
|
139
|
-
evaluate: nil,
|
|
140
|
-
condition_id: "my_condition_1")
|
|
141
|
-
agent_with_condition_id = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator_with_condition_id])
|
|
142
|
-
|
|
143
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze([], agent_with_condition_id)
|
|
144
|
-
expect(report.condition_coverage).to be_an(Array)
|
|
145
|
-
end
|
|
146
|
-
|
|
147
|
-
it "caps coverage percentage at 1.0" do
|
|
148
|
-
# Create a scenario where coverage could exceed 1.0
|
|
149
|
-
evaluator1 = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::StaticEvaluator.new(decision: "approve", weight: 1.0)
|
|
150
|
-
single_agent = DecisionAgent::Agent.new(evaluators: [evaluator1])
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
results_with_metadata = [
|
|
153
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
154
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
155
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
156
|
-
evaluations: [
|
|
157
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
158
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
159
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
160
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
161
|
-
evaluator_name: evaluator1.class.name,
|
|
162
|
-
metadata: { rule_id: "rule_1" }
|
|
163
|
-
)
|
|
164
|
-
]
|
|
165
|
-
)
|
|
166
|
-
]
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(results_with_metadata, single_agent)
|
|
169
|
-
expect(report.coverage_percentage).to be <= 1.0
|
|
170
|
-
end
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
it "handles results without agent" do
|
|
173
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(results, nil)
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
175
|
-
expect(report).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Testing::CoverageReport)
|
|
176
|
-
expect(report.covered_rules).to be >= 0
|
|
177
|
-
end
|
|
178
|
-
|
|
179
|
-
it "handles empty results" do
|
|
180
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze([], agent)
|
|
181
|
-
|
|
182
|
-
expect(report.covered_rules).to eq(0)
|
|
183
|
-
expect(report.coverage_percentage).to eq(0.0)
|
|
184
|
-
end
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
it "handles failed test results" do
|
|
187
|
-
failed_results = [
|
|
188
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
189
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
190
|
-
error: StandardError.new("Test failed")
|
|
191
|
-
)
|
|
192
|
-
]
|
|
193
|
-
|
|
194
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(failed_results, agent)
|
|
195
|
-
|
|
196
|
-
expect(report.covered_rules).to eq(0)
|
|
197
|
-
end
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
199
|
-
it "handles evaluations without metadata" do
|
|
200
|
-
results_no_metadata = [
|
|
201
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
202
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
203
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
204
|
-
evaluations: [
|
|
205
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
206
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
207
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
208
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
209
|
-
evaluator_name: "TestEvaluator"
|
|
210
|
-
# No metadata
|
|
211
|
-
)
|
|
212
|
-
]
|
|
213
|
-
)
|
|
214
|
-
]
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
216
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(results_no_metadata, agent)
|
|
217
|
-
expect(report).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Testing::CoverageReport)
|
|
218
|
-
end
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
it "handles evaluations with evaluator_name as rule identifier" do
|
|
221
|
-
results_eval_name = [
|
|
222
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::TestResult.new(
|
|
223
|
-
scenario_id: "test_1",
|
|
224
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
225
|
-
evaluations: [
|
|
226
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
227
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
228
|
-
weight: 1.0,
|
|
229
|
-
reason: "Test",
|
|
230
|
-
evaluator_name: "MyEvaluator"
|
|
231
|
-
# No metadata, should use evaluator_name
|
|
232
|
-
)
|
|
233
|
-
]
|
|
234
|
-
)
|
|
235
|
-
]
|
|
236
|
-
|
|
237
|
-
report = analyzer.analyze(results_eval_name, agent)
|
|
238
|
-
expect(report.covered_rules).to be >= 0
|
|
239
|
-
end
|
|
240
|
-
end
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
describe "#coverage_percentage" do
|
|
243
|
-
it "returns 0.0 when no rules executed" do
|
|
244
|
-
expect(analyzer.coverage_percentage).to eq(0.0)
|
|
245
|
-
end
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
247
|
-
it "returns 0.0 when rule_evaluation_count is empty" do
|
|
248
|
-
analyzer.instance_variable_set(:@executed_rules, Set.new(["rule_1"]))
|
|
249
|
-
analyzer.instance_variable_set(:@rule_evaluation_count, {})
|
|
250
|
-
|
|
251
|
-
expect(analyzer.coverage_percentage).to eq(0.0)
|
|
252
|
-
end
|
|
253
|
-
end
|
|
254
|
-
|
|
255
|
-
describe "CoverageReport" do
|
|
256
|
-
let(:report) do
|
|
257
|
-
DecisionAgent::Testing::CoverageReport.new(
|
|
258
|
-
total_rules: 10,
|
|
259
|
-
covered_rules: 7,
|
|
260
|
-
untested_rules: %w[rule_8 rule_9 rule_10],
|
|
261
|
-
coverage_percentage: 0.7,
|
|
262
|
-
rule_coverage: [
|
|
263
|
-
{ rule_id: "rule_1", covered: true, execution_count: 5 }
|
|
264
|
-
],
|
|
265
|
-
condition_coverage: [
|
|
266
|
-
{ condition_id: "condition_1", covered: true, execution_count: 3 }
|
|
267
|
-
]
|
|
268
|
-
)
|
|
269
|
-
end
|
|
270
|
-
|
|
271
|
-
it "creates a coverage report" do
|
|
272
|
-
expect(report.total_rules).to eq(10)
|
|
273
|
-
expect(report.covered_rules).to eq(7)
|
|
274
|
-
expect(report.untested_rules).to eq(%w[rule_8 rule_9 rule_10])
|
|
275
|
-
expect(report.coverage_percentage).to eq(0.7)
|
|
276
|
-
end
|
|
277
|
-
|
|
278
|
-
it "converts to hash" do
|
|
279
|
-
hash = report.to_h
|
|
280
|
-
|
|
281
|
-
expect(hash[:total_rules]).to eq(10)
|
|
282
|
-
expect(hash[:covered_rules]).to eq(7)
|
|
283
|
-
expect(hash[:coverage_percentage]).to eq(0.7)
|
|
284
|
-
expect(hash[:rule_coverage]).to be_an(Array)
|
|
285
|
-
expect(hash[:condition_coverage]).to be_an(Array)
|
|
286
|
-
end
|
|
287
|
-
|
|
288
|
-
it "freezes the report" do
|
|
289
|
-
expect(report.frozen?).to be true
|
|
290
|
-
end
|
|
291
|
-
end
|
|
292
|
-
end
|