decision_agent 0.3.0 → 1.0.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- checksums.yaml +4 -4
- data/README.md +272 -7
- data/lib/decision_agent/agent.rb +72 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/context.rb +1 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/cache/memory_adapter.rb +86 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/cache_adapter.rb +49 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/circuit_breaker.rb +135 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/client.rb +220 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/config.rb +78 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/errors.rb +36 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/decision.rb +102 -2
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/evaluator.rb +28 -6
- data/lib/decision_agent/dsl/condition_evaluator.rb +982 -839
- data/lib/decision_agent/dsl/schema_validator.rb +51 -13
- data/lib/decision_agent/evaluators/dmn_evaluator.rb +106 -19
- data/lib/decision_agent/evaluators/json_rule_evaluator.rb +69 -9
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/condition_trace.rb +83 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/explainability_result.rb +52 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/rule_trace.rb +39 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/trace_collector.rb +24 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/monitoring/alert_manager.rb +5 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/errors.rb +18 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/impact_analyzer.rb +498 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/monte_carlo_simulator.rb +635 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/replay_engine.rb +486 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/scenario_engine.rb +318 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/scenario_library.rb +163 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/shadow_test_engine.rb +287 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/what_if_analyzer.rb +1002 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation.rb +17 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/version.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/versioning/activerecord_adapter.rb +23 -8
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/app.js +119 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/index.html +49 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation.html +130 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_impact.html +478 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_replay.html +551 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_shadow.html +546 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_whatif.html +532 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/styles.css +65 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/server.rb +594 -23
- data/lib/decision_agent.rb +60 -2
- metadata +53 -73
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_assignment_spec.rb +0 -253
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_manager_spec.rb +0 -612
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_spec.rb +0 -270
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_testing_agent_spec.rb +0 -655
- data/spec/ab_testing/storage/adapter_spec.rb +0 -64
- data/spec/ab_testing/storage/memory_adapter_spec.rb +0 -485
- data/spec/activerecord_thread_safety_spec.rb +0 -553
- data/spec/advanced_operators_spec.rb +0 -3150
- data/spec/agent_spec.rb +0 -289
- data/spec/api_contract_spec.rb +0 -430
- data/spec/audit_adapters_spec.rb +0 -92
- data/spec/auth/access_audit_logger_spec.rb +0 -394
- data/spec/auth/authenticator_spec.rb +0 -112
- data/spec/auth/password_reset_spec.rb +0 -294
- data/spec/auth/permission_checker_spec.rb +0 -207
- data/spec/auth/permission_spec.rb +0 -73
- data/spec/auth/rbac_adapter_spec.rb +0 -778
- data/spec/auth/rbac_config_spec.rb +0 -82
- data/spec/auth/role_spec.rb +0 -51
- data/spec/auth/session_manager_spec.rb +0 -172
- data/spec/auth/session_spec.rb +0 -112
- data/spec/auth/user_spec.rb +0 -130
- data/spec/comprehensive_edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -1777
- data/spec/context_spec.rb +0 -127
- data/spec/decision_agent_spec.rb +0 -96
- data/spec/decision_spec.rb +0 -423
- data/spec/dmn/decision_graph_spec.rb +0 -282
- data/spec/dmn/decision_tree_spec.rb +0 -203
- data/spec/dmn/feel/errors_spec.rb +0 -18
- data/spec/dmn/feel/functions_spec.rb +0 -400
- data/spec/dmn/feel/simple_parser_spec.rb +0 -274
- data/spec/dmn/feel/types_spec.rb +0 -176
- data/spec/dmn/feel_parser_spec.rb +0 -489
- data/spec/dmn/hit_policy_spec.rb +0 -202
- data/spec/dmn/integration_spec.rb +0 -226
- data/spec/dsl/condition_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -774
- data/spec/dsl_validation_spec.rb +0 -648
- data/spec/edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -353
- data/spec/evaluation_spec.rb +0 -364
- data/spec/evaluation_validator_spec.rb +0 -165
- data/spec/examples/feedback_aware_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -460
- data/spec/examples.txt +0 -1909
- data/spec/fixtures/dmn/complex_decision.dmn +0 -81
- data/spec/fixtures/dmn/invalid_structure.dmn +0 -31
- data/spec/fixtures/dmn/simple_decision.dmn +0 -40
- data/spec/issue_verification_spec.rb +0 -759
- data/spec/json_rule_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -587
- data/spec/monitoring/alert_manager_spec.rb +0 -378
- data/spec/monitoring/metrics_collector_spec.rb +0 -501
- data/spec/monitoring/monitored_agent_spec.rb +0 -225
- data/spec/monitoring/prometheus_exporter_spec.rb +0 -242
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/activerecord_adapter_spec.rb +0 -498
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/base_adapter_spec.rb +0 -61
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/memory_adapter_spec.rb +0 -247
- data/spec/performance_optimizations_spec.rb +0 -493
- data/spec/replay_edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -699
- data/spec/replay_spec.rb +0 -210
- data/spec/rfc8785_canonicalization_spec.rb +0 -215
- data/spec/scoring_spec.rb +0 -225
- data/spec/spec_helper.rb +0 -60
- data/spec/testing/batch_test_importer_spec.rb +0 -693
- data/spec/testing/batch_test_runner_spec.rb +0 -307
- data/spec/testing/test_coverage_analyzer_spec.rb +0 -292
- data/spec/testing/test_result_comparator_spec.rb +0 -392
- data/spec/testing/test_scenario_spec.rb +0 -113
- data/spec/thread_safety_spec.rb +0 -490
- data/spec/thread_safety_spec.rb.broken +0 -878
- data/spec/versioning/adapter_spec.rb +0 -156
- data/spec/versioning_spec.rb +0 -1030
- data/spec/web/middleware/auth_middleware_spec.rb +0 -133
- data/spec/web/middleware/permission_middleware_spec.rb +0 -247
- data/spec/web_ui_rack_spec.rb +0 -2134
|
@@ -1,587 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
require "spec_helper"
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
RSpec.describe DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator do
|
|
4
|
-
describe "basic rule matching" do
|
|
5
|
-
it "matches simple equality rule" do
|
|
6
|
-
rules = {
|
|
7
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
8
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
9
|
-
rules: [
|
|
10
|
-
{
|
|
11
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
12
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" },
|
|
13
|
-
then: { decision: "approve", weight: 0.8, reason: "Status is active" }
|
|
14
|
-
}
|
|
15
|
-
]
|
|
16
|
-
}
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
19
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "active" })
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
expect(evaluation).not_to be_nil
|
|
24
|
-
expect(evaluation.decision).to eq("approve")
|
|
25
|
-
expect(evaluation.weight).to eq(0.8)
|
|
26
|
-
expect(evaluation.reason).to eq("Status is active")
|
|
27
|
-
expect(evaluation.metadata[:rule_id]).to eq("rule_1")
|
|
28
|
-
end
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
it "returns nil when no rules match" do
|
|
31
|
-
rules = {
|
|
32
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
33
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
34
|
-
rules: [
|
|
35
|
-
{
|
|
36
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
37
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" },
|
|
38
|
-
then: { decision: "approve" }
|
|
39
|
-
}
|
|
40
|
-
]
|
|
41
|
-
}
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
44
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "inactive" })
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
expect(evaluation).to be_nil
|
|
49
|
-
end
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
it "matches first rule when multiple rules match" do
|
|
52
|
-
rules = {
|
|
53
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
54
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
55
|
-
rules: [
|
|
56
|
-
{
|
|
57
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
58
|
-
if: { field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "high" },
|
|
59
|
-
then: { decision: "escalate" }
|
|
60
|
-
},
|
|
61
|
-
{
|
|
62
|
-
id: "rule_2",
|
|
63
|
-
if: { field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "high" },
|
|
64
|
-
then: { decision: "notify" }
|
|
65
|
-
}
|
|
66
|
-
]
|
|
67
|
-
}
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
70
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "high" })
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
expect(evaluation.decision).to eq("escalate")
|
|
75
|
-
expect(evaluation.metadata[:rule_id]).to eq("rule_1")
|
|
76
|
-
end
|
|
77
|
-
end
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
describe "all/any conditions" do
|
|
80
|
-
it "matches 'all' condition when all sub-conditions are true" do
|
|
81
|
-
rules = {
|
|
82
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
83
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
84
|
-
rules: [
|
|
85
|
-
{
|
|
86
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
87
|
-
if: {
|
|
88
|
-
all: [
|
|
89
|
-
{ field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "high" },
|
|
90
|
-
{ field: "hours", op: "gte", value: 4 }
|
|
91
|
-
]
|
|
92
|
-
},
|
|
93
|
-
then: { decision: "notify" }
|
|
94
|
-
}
|
|
95
|
-
]
|
|
96
|
-
}
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
99
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "high", hours: 5 })
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
expect(evaluation).not_to be_nil
|
|
104
|
-
expect(evaluation.decision).to eq("notify")
|
|
105
|
-
end
|
|
106
|
-
|
|
107
|
-
it "does not match 'all' when one sub-condition fails" do
|
|
108
|
-
rules = {
|
|
109
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
110
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
111
|
-
rules: [
|
|
112
|
-
{
|
|
113
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
114
|
-
if: {
|
|
115
|
-
all: [
|
|
116
|
-
{ field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "high" },
|
|
117
|
-
{ field: "hours", op: "gte", value: 4 }
|
|
118
|
-
]
|
|
119
|
-
},
|
|
120
|
-
then: { decision: "notify" }
|
|
121
|
-
}
|
|
122
|
-
]
|
|
123
|
-
}
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
126
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "high", hours: 2 })
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
expect(evaluation).to be_nil
|
|
131
|
-
end
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
it "matches 'any' condition when at least one sub-condition is true" do
|
|
134
|
-
rules = {
|
|
135
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
136
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
137
|
-
rules: [
|
|
138
|
-
{
|
|
139
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
140
|
-
if: {
|
|
141
|
-
any: [
|
|
142
|
-
{ field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "critical" },
|
|
143
|
-
{ field: "hours", op: "gte", value: 24 }
|
|
144
|
-
]
|
|
145
|
-
},
|
|
146
|
-
then: { decision: "escalate" }
|
|
147
|
-
}
|
|
148
|
-
]
|
|
149
|
-
}
|
|
150
|
-
|
|
151
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
152
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "low", hours: 30 })
|
|
153
|
-
|
|
154
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
expect(evaluation).not_to be_nil
|
|
157
|
-
expect(evaluation.decision).to eq("escalate")
|
|
158
|
-
end
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
it "does not match 'any' when all sub-conditions fail" do
|
|
161
|
-
rules = {
|
|
162
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
163
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
164
|
-
rules: [
|
|
165
|
-
{
|
|
166
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
167
|
-
if: {
|
|
168
|
-
any: [
|
|
169
|
-
{ field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "critical" },
|
|
170
|
-
{ field: "hours", op: "gte", value: 24 }
|
|
171
|
-
]
|
|
172
|
-
},
|
|
173
|
-
then: { decision: "escalate" }
|
|
174
|
-
}
|
|
175
|
-
]
|
|
176
|
-
}
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
178
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
179
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "low", hours: 5 })
|
|
180
|
-
|
|
181
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
182
|
-
|
|
183
|
-
expect(evaluation).to be_nil
|
|
184
|
-
end
|
|
185
|
-
end
|
|
186
|
-
|
|
187
|
-
describe "comparison operators" do
|
|
188
|
-
it "supports gt (greater than)" do
|
|
189
|
-
rules = {
|
|
190
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
191
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
192
|
-
rules: [
|
|
193
|
-
{
|
|
194
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
195
|
-
if: { field: "score", op: "gt", value: 80 },
|
|
196
|
-
then: { decision: "pass" }
|
|
197
|
-
}
|
|
198
|
-
]
|
|
199
|
-
}
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ score: 85 })
|
|
204
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ score: 80 })
|
|
205
|
-
|
|
206
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
207
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
208
|
-
end
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
it "supports gte (greater than or equal)" do
|
|
211
|
-
rules = {
|
|
212
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
213
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
214
|
-
rules: [
|
|
215
|
-
{
|
|
216
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
217
|
-
if: { field: "score", op: "gte", value: 80 },
|
|
218
|
-
then: { decision: "pass" }
|
|
219
|
-
}
|
|
220
|
-
]
|
|
221
|
-
}
|
|
222
|
-
|
|
223
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
224
|
-
|
|
225
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ score: 80 })
|
|
226
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ score: 79 })
|
|
227
|
-
|
|
228
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
229
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
230
|
-
end
|
|
231
|
-
|
|
232
|
-
it "supports lt (less than)" do
|
|
233
|
-
rules = {
|
|
234
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
235
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
236
|
-
rules: [
|
|
237
|
-
{
|
|
238
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
239
|
-
if: { field: "temperature", op: "lt", value: 32 },
|
|
240
|
-
then: { decision: "freeze" }
|
|
241
|
-
}
|
|
242
|
-
]
|
|
243
|
-
}
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
247
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ temperature: 30 })
|
|
248
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ temperature: 32 })
|
|
249
|
-
|
|
250
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
251
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
252
|
-
end
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
254
|
-
it "supports lte (less than or equal)" do
|
|
255
|
-
rules = {
|
|
256
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
257
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
258
|
-
rules: [
|
|
259
|
-
{
|
|
260
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
261
|
-
if: { field: "temperature", op: "lte", value: 32 },
|
|
262
|
-
then: { decision: "freeze" }
|
|
263
|
-
}
|
|
264
|
-
]
|
|
265
|
-
}
|
|
266
|
-
|
|
267
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
268
|
-
|
|
269
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ temperature: 32 })
|
|
270
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ temperature: 33 })
|
|
271
|
-
|
|
272
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
273
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
274
|
-
end
|
|
275
|
-
|
|
276
|
-
it "supports neq (not equal)" do
|
|
277
|
-
rules = {
|
|
278
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
279
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
280
|
-
rules: [
|
|
281
|
-
{
|
|
282
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
283
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "neq", value: "closed" },
|
|
284
|
-
then: { decision: "process" }
|
|
285
|
-
}
|
|
286
|
-
]
|
|
287
|
-
}
|
|
288
|
-
|
|
289
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
290
|
-
|
|
291
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "open" })
|
|
292
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "closed" })
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
294
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
295
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
296
|
-
end
|
|
297
|
-
|
|
298
|
-
it "supports in (array membership)" do
|
|
299
|
-
rules = {
|
|
300
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
301
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
302
|
-
rules: [
|
|
303
|
-
{
|
|
304
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
305
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "in", value: %w[open pending review] },
|
|
306
|
-
then: { decision: "active" }
|
|
307
|
-
}
|
|
308
|
-
]
|
|
309
|
-
}
|
|
310
|
-
|
|
311
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
312
|
-
|
|
313
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "pending" })
|
|
314
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "closed" })
|
|
315
|
-
|
|
316
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
317
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
318
|
-
end
|
|
319
|
-
|
|
320
|
-
it "supports present (field exists and not empty)" do
|
|
321
|
-
rules = {
|
|
322
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
323
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
324
|
-
rules: [
|
|
325
|
-
{
|
|
326
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
327
|
-
if: { field: "assignee", op: "present" },
|
|
328
|
-
then: { decision: "assigned" }
|
|
329
|
-
}
|
|
330
|
-
]
|
|
331
|
-
}
|
|
332
|
-
|
|
333
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
334
|
-
|
|
335
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ assignee: "alice" })
|
|
336
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ assignee: nil })
|
|
337
|
-
context3 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ assignee: "" })
|
|
338
|
-
context4 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({})
|
|
339
|
-
|
|
340
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
341
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
342
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context3)).to be_nil
|
|
343
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context4)).to be_nil
|
|
344
|
-
end
|
|
345
|
-
|
|
346
|
-
it "supports blank (field missing, nil, or empty)" do
|
|
347
|
-
rules = {
|
|
348
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
349
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
350
|
-
rules: [
|
|
351
|
-
{
|
|
352
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
353
|
-
if: { field: "description", op: "blank" },
|
|
354
|
-
then: { decision: "needs_description" }
|
|
355
|
-
}
|
|
356
|
-
]
|
|
357
|
-
}
|
|
358
|
-
|
|
359
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
360
|
-
|
|
361
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ description: "" })
|
|
362
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ description: nil })
|
|
363
|
-
context3 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({})
|
|
364
|
-
context4 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ description: "valid" })
|
|
365
|
-
|
|
366
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
367
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).not_to be_nil
|
|
368
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context3)).not_to be_nil
|
|
369
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context4)).to be_nil
|
|
370
|
-
end
|
|
371
|
-
end
|
|
372
|
-
|
|
373
|
-
describe "nested field access" do
|
|
374
|
-
it "supports dot notation for nested fields" do
|
|
375
|
-
rules = {
|
|
376
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
377
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
378
|
-
rules: [
|
|
379
|
-
{
|
|
380
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
381
|
-
if: { field: "user.role", op: "eq", value: "admin" },
|
|
382
|
-
then: { decision: "allow" }
|
|
383
|
-
}
|
|
384
|
-
]
|
|
385
|
-
}
|
|
386
|
-
|
|
387
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
388
|
-
|
|
389
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: { role: "admin" } })
|
|
390
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: { role: "user" } })
|
|
391
|
-
|
|
392
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
393
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
394
|
-
end
|
|
395
|
-
|
|
396
|
-
it "handles missing nested fields gracefully" do
|
|
397
|
-
rules = {
|
|
398
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
399
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
400
|
-
rules: [
|
|
401
|
-
{
|
|
402
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
403
|
-
if: { field: "user.role", op: "eq", value: "admin" },
|
|
404
|
-
then: { decision: "allow" }
|
|
405
|
-
}
|
|
406
|
-
]
|
|
407
|
-
}
|
|
408
|
-
|
|
409
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
410
|
-
|
|
411
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({})
|
|
412
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: nil })
|
|
413
|
-
|
|
414
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).to be_nil
|
|
415
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).to be_nil
|
|
416
|
-
end
|
|
417
|
-
end
|
|
418
|
-
|
|
419
|
-
describe "invalid DSL handling" do
|
|
420
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError for malformed JSON" do
|
|
421
|
-
expect do
|
|
422
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: "{ invalid json")
|
|
423
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /Invalid JSON/)
|
|
424
|
-
end
|
|
425
|
-
|
|
426
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError when version is missing" do
|
|
427
|
-
rules = { rules: [] }
|
|
428
|
-
|
|
429
|
-
expect do
|
|
430
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
431
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /version/)
|
|
432
|
-
end
|
|
433
|
-
|
|
434
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError when rules array is missing" do
|
|
435
|
-
rules = { version: "1.0" }
|
|
436
|
-
|
|
437
|
-
expect do
|
|
438
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
439
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /rules/)
|
|
440
|
-
end
|
|
441
|
-
|
|
442
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError when rule is missing id" do
|
|
443
|
-
rules = {
|
|
444
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
445
|
-
rules: [
|
|
446
|
-
{
|
|
447
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" },
|
|
448
|
-
then: { decision: "approve" }
|
|
449
|
-
}
|
|
450
|
-
]
|
|
451
|
-
}
|
|
452
|
-
|
|
453
|
-
expect do
|
|
454
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
455
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /Missing required field 'id'/)
|
|
456
|
-
end
|
|
457
|
-
|
|
458
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError when rule is missing if clause" do
|
|
459
|
-
rules = {
|
|
460
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
461
|
-
rules: [
|
|
462
|
-
{
|
|
463
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
464
|
-
then: { decision: "approve" }
|
|
465
|
-
}
|
|
466
|
-
]
|
|
467
|
-
}
|
|
468
|
-
|
|
469
|
-
expect do
|
|
470
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
471
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /Missing required field 'if'/)
|
|
472
|
-
end
|
|
473
|
-
|
|
474
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError when rule is missing then clause" do
|
|
475
|
-
rules = {
|
|
476
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
477
|
-
rules: [
|
|
478
|
-
{
|
|
479
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
480
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" }
|
|
481
|
-
}
|
|
482
|
-
]
|
|
483
|
-
}
|
|
484
|
-
|
|
485
|
-
expect do
|
|
486
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
487
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /Missing required field 'then'/)
|
|
488
|
-
end
|
|
489
|
-
|
|
490
|
-
it "raises InvalidRuleDslError when then clause is missing decision" do
|
|
491
|
-
rules = {
|
|
492
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
493
|
-
rules: [
|
|
494
|
-
{
|
|
495
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
496
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" },
|
|
497
|
-
then: { weight: 0.8 }
|
|
498
|
-
}
|
|
499
|
-
]
|
|
500
|
-
}
|
|
501
|
-
|
|
502
|
-
expect do
|
|
503
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
504
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidRuleDslError, /Missing required field 'decision'/)
|
|
505
|
-
end
|
|
506
|
-
end
|
|
507
|
-
|
|
508
|
-
describe "default values" do
|
|
509
|
-
it "uses default weight of 1.0 when not specified" do
|
|
510
|
-
rules = {
|
|
511
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
512
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
513
|
-
rules: [
|
|
514
|
-
{
|
|
515
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
516
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" },
|
|
517
|
-
then: { decision: "approve" }
|
|
518
|
-
}
|
|
519
|
-
]
|
|
520
|
-
}
|
|
521
|
-
|
|
522
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
523
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "active" })
|
|
524
|
-
|
|
525
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
526
|
-
|
|
527
|
-
expect(evaluation.weight).to eq(1.0)
|
|
528
|
-
end
|
|
529
|
-
|
|
530
|
-
it "uses default reason when not specified" do
|
|
531
|
-
rules = {
|
|
532
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
533
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
534
|
-
rules: [
|
|
535
|
-
{
|
|
536
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
537
|
-
if: { field: "status", op: "eq", value: "active" },
|
|
538
|
-
then: { decision: "approve" }
|
|
539
|
-
}
|
|
540
|
-
]
|
|
541
|
-
}
|
|
542
|
-
|
|
543
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
544
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "active" })
|
|
545
|
-
|
|
546
|
-
evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(context)
|
|
547
|
-
|
|
548
|
-
expect(evaluation.reason).to eq("Rule matched")
|
|
549
|
-
end
|
|
550
|
-
end
|
|
551
|
-
|
|
552
|
-
describe "complex nested conditions" do
|
|
553
|
-
it "handles nested all/any combinations" do
|
|
554
|
-
rules = {
|
|
555
|
-
version: "1.0",
|
|
556
|
-
ruleset: "test",
|
|
557
|
-
rules: [
|
|
558
|
-
{
|
|
559
|
-
id: "rule_1",
|
|
560
|
-
if: {
|
|
561
|
-
all: [
|
|
562
|
-
{ field: "priority", op: "eq", value: "high" },
|
|
563
|
-
{
|
|
564
|
-
any: [
|
|
565
|
-
{ field: "hours", op: "gte", value: 24 },
|
|
566
|
-
{ field: "escalated", op: "eq", value: true }
|
|
567
|
-
]
|
|
568
|
-
}
|
|
569
|
-
]
|
|
570
|
-
},
|
|
571
|
-
then: { decision: "urgent" }
|
|
572
|
-
}
|
|
573
|
-
]
|
|
574
|
-
}
|
|
575
|
-
|
|
576
|
-
evaluator = DecisionAgent::Evaluators::JsonRuleEvaluator.new(rules_json: rules)
|
|
577
|
-
|
|
578
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "high", hours: 30, escalated: false })
|
|
579
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "high", hours: 5, escalated: true })
|
|
580
|
-
context3 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "low", hours: 30, escalated: true })
|
|
581
|
-
|
|
582
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context1)).not_to be_nil
|
|
583
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context2)).not_to be_nil
|
|
584
|
-
expect(evaluator.evaluate(context3)).to be_nil
|
|
585
|
-
end
|
|
586
|
-
end
|
|
587
|
-
end
|