clickwrap 0.0.0 → 0.1.1

data/guides/receipts-and-verification.md

@@ -0,0 +1,415 @@
+# Receipts and verification
+
+A receipt answers "show me exactly what the application recorded." There is one canonical JSON body
+per event and one HTML projection of the same facts — never a different set of facts, and never
+a stronger claim than the JSON makes.
+
+```ruby
+receipt = Clickwrap.receipt(event_id)
+
+receipt.to_canonical_json     # the verifiable bytes
+receipt.to_html               # the human projection
+receipt.verify                # against this application's data
+```
+
+`to_pdf` deliberately raises. A PDF library is not a dependency of an evidence gem, and a PDF
+is a rendering of the receipt rather than the record. Run your own pipeline over `to_html` if
+you need one.
+
+---
+
+## Anatomy
+
+Everything below describes the released receipt schema. Keys whose value would be empty are
+omitted rather than written as `null` — the one exception being request evidence, which always
+reports an explicit state object.
+
+### Top level
+
+| Key | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `schema` | `"clickwrap.receipt.v1"`. A verifier that does not know this name stops rather than guessing |
+| `event_id` | The stable identifier the domain row can reference |
+| `event_type` | What produced the event: `capture`, `withdrawal`, `correction`, `supersession`, `expiry`, `consumption`, `revocation`, `renewal`, `scope_change`, `exemption`, `imported_legacy`, `external_receipt`, `disposition`, `legal_hold_placed`, `legal_hold_released`, `receipt_access`, or `provider_outcome` |
+| `recorded_at_by_server` | When this application wrote the row down |
+| `occurred_at` | When the act happened, according to whatever recorded it. For a live capture these coincide; for an import they usually do not, and the gap is itself evidence |
+| `verifier_instructions` | A sentence telling a reader how to check the file without this application |
+
+### `policy`
+
+| Key | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `key` | The policy key as declared in `Clickwrap.policy` |
+| `revision` | The digest of the compiled policy revision frozen at capture. Historical receipts do not need current source code to explain what the policy meant |
+| `retention_class` | Which retention class governed this event |
+
+### `actor`
+
+| Key | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `type` | The actor model's class name |
+| `reference` | The stable reference produced by `config.identify_actor_with`: a model's `clickwrap_actor_reference`, otherwise GlobalID when available, otherwise `ClassName/id`. The recorded string survives the row being deleted |
+| `attribution.method` | One of `authenticated_session`, `account_registration`, `operator_session`, `api_credential`, `anonymous_identifier`, `system_process`, `imported_provider`, `unknown`. None of these is an identity claim; each says which application-supplied context was recorded |
+| `attribution.authenticated` | True only when the method was `authenticated_session` |
+| `authentication_method` | The host's own description from `config.describe_authentication_with`. Its default claims `{ method: :authenticated_session }` only when the controller's configured current-actor method returns someone, and `{}` otherwise — a signup form and a controller with no authentication at all both record nothing rather than a claim nobody checked |
+| `snapshot` | Only the actor fields the host named in `config.snapshot_actor_with`. Clickwrap never serializes a whole model into evidence |
+| `acting_for` | Present only for delegated action: the represented party's type and reference, the authority source, the authority role, and when authority was verified — as four separate facts. Clickwrap does not decide whether that authority was sufficient |
+| `tenant` | The tenant key, when the capture had one |
+| `subject.reference` / `subject.fingerprint` | Which domain object the act was about, and the host-computed fingerprint that binds it |
+
+### `acts[]`
+
+One entry per statement. A policy with several statements produces one event and one receipt,
+but the statements never collapse into one meaning.
+
+| Key | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `statement` | The statement key |
+| `kind` | `agreement`, `acknowledgment`, `consent`, `declaration`, `attestation`, or `authorization` |
+| `action` | What was recorded for this kind — see [the lifecycle guide](consent-and-lifecycle.md) |
+| `assertion` | The **resolved sentence** bound to the generated presentation, not an I18n key. A key's meaning can change in a later deploy; then the receipt no longer says what the server asked |
+| `locale` | The locale that sentence was resolved in |
+| `required` / `answered` / `answer` | Whether the statement was required, whether it was answered, and what the answer was |
+| `purpose` | The purpose key, for consent |
+| `expires_at` | When this act stops being current, for kinds that can expire |
+| `one_time` | Present only when the act is a one-time authorization |
+| `subject_fingerprint` | The fingerprint recorded for this statement's subject binding |
+
+### `documents[]`
+
+| Key | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `statement` | Which statement this document was attached to |
+| `key`, `version`, `locale` | Which exact document version was bound |
+| `source_media_type` / `source_digest` | The media type and digest of the original source bytes, as they stood at capture |
+| `rendered_media_type` / `rendered_digest` | The media type and digest of the rendered representation actually offered |
+| `renderer` | The named renderer and sanitizer versions that produced the rendered bytes, when applicable |
+| `ordinal` | The document's order within the presentation |
+
+Two digests, because "this Markdown file existed" and "this rendered representation was
+offered" are different claims. The digests are copied onto the event rather than only
+referenced, so verification can detect a document-version row edited in place instead of
+trusting the column it is supposed to be checking.
+
+### `presentation`
+
+| Key | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `manifest_digest` | The canonical digest of the presentation manifest the server generated |
+| `submit_button_text` | The exact call-to-action wording in that manifest |
+| `combined_sentence` | Present only when the offer was ONE control carrying one composed sentence ("I agree to the Terms of Service and I acknowledge the Privacy Policy."). The acts say what was recorded; this says what the person read, which is what a substitution argument is actually about |
+| `combined_statements` | Which statement keys that one answer covered |
+| `locale` | The locale the presentation was rendered in |
+| `capture_channel` | `web_browser`, `native_app`, `api_client`, `operator`, `background_job`, `imported_provider`, or `system` |
+| `offered_at` | When the manifest was issued |
+| `proves` | A sentence, inside the receipt itself, saying what this establishes: that the server generated the manifest and accepted a submission bound to it — and not that the person read or understood the documents, saw particular pixels, or received a sufficient interface |
+
+### `outcome`, `lifecycle`, `provider`
+
+`outcome` is the protected action's in-transaction result snapshot when the policy configured
+`record_protected_outcome_with`. The callback receives the block's return value and should use
+`Clickwrap.protected_outcome(action:, record:, facts:, state: nil)`. The resulting reference,
+non-empty canonical facts, and fingerprint over the complete claim are validated before commit;
+a malformed or stale fingerprint rolls the domain action and evidence back together. Without a
+recorder, the receipt says only that the named policy, bound subject, evidence event, and block
+committed together — Clickwrap does not guess what a host method meant. A pending external outbox
+does not claim a completed local outcome; its provider result is appended later.
+
+`lifecycle` carries `root_event_id`, `predecessor_event_id`, and every successor event with its
+type, time, reason, canonical event body, and event digest. This is where a withdrawal,
+correction, supersession, expiry, consumption, or disposition shows up. Ordinary lifecycle
+changes append instead of overwriting the earlier event; reviewed core disposition is the named
+exception that removes a fixed payload while retaining a linked tombstone.
+
+That makes an exported receipt a projection at the moment it was exported. A later export may
+add lifecycle successors or integrity attestations, so its top-level `receipt_digest` may be
+different even though both exports are valid. The embedded canonical `event` object and its
+`integrity.event_digest` are the stable historical anchor for the original event: lifecycle
+history grows by appending linked events rather than changing that body. Keep an exported file
+if the exact export itself matters; do not use byte equality between exports as a current-state
+test.
+
+`provider` appears only on imported external receipts, and carries the provider name, its event
+ID, its verification status, and a `note` stating plainly that Clickwrap did not present this
+content or observe this action.
+
+### `request_evidence`
+
+Three keys — `ip_address`, `browser_user_agent`, `ip_geolocation` — each always present, each
+carrying a `state`. See [the request-evidence guide](request-evidence.md) for the field-level
+dictionary. What matters here is that raw values are **not** in the canonical body by default.
+They live in a separately encrypted annex with its own authorization, retention, hold, and
+disposition state, and the body carries only a keyed digest binding the two.
+
+That boundary is the whole reason the annex exists. Welding an IP address into the core event
+would force its schedule to match the agreement payload. Here each annex category can go on its
+own clock while the retained core event stays intact and verifiable.
+
+An export that reveals request evidence is a different document from a redacted one, so it
+carries a different `receipt_digest`. That is correct: each file verifies as the file it
+actually is.
+
+### `retention`
+
+`class`, `core_event_retained_until`, `retention_rule`, `core_event_disposed_at`, and
+`on_legal_hold`. See [the retention guide](retention-and-legal-holds.md).
+
+### `system`
+
+`gem_version`, `application_version`, `template_version`, `canonical_schema_version`, and
+`verifier_version` — so a reader can tell which code wrote the receipt and which code read it.
+
+---
+
+## The two digests
+
+`integrity` carries both `receipt_digest` and `event_digest`. They are different values, they
+cover different bytes, and confusing them is the single easiest way to overstate what a
+verification result means.
+
+| | `integrity.receipt_digest` | `integrity.event_digest` |
+|---|---|---|
+| Covers | This receipt body, with only `integrity.receipt_digest` removed, canonicalized per RFC 8785 | The **event's own** canonical body embedded at top-level `event`: a different object, with different keys, built when the event was written |
+| Computed | When the receipt is produced, by whoever produced it | Once, at capture, and stored on the event row |
+| Checkable from a file alone | **Yes.** | **Yes while the event payload is retained.** After reviewed core disposition, the verifier checks the retained tombstone and exact digest-linked disposition successor instead and labels the original digest check incomplete |
+| Answers | "Has this exported projection changed since this digest was taken?" | "Does the embedded historical event body match the digest recorded when that event was finalized?" In-app verification additionally compares against the database row |
+
+The exclusion of `integrity` is not a convenience. A digest cannot cover itself: the moment it
+is written into the object, the object's bytes change and no amount of recomputation converges.
+So the digest is taken over the body before `integrity.receipt_digest` is attached, and
+verification reproduces that by removing exactly that field. Everything else — including the
+rest of `integrity`, `verifier_instructions`, and any host `x_`-prefixed extension — is inside the digest. A key
+excluded without being named would be a key anyone could edit freely.
+
+The receipt embeds the event's canonical body under `event`, so the standalone verifier re-derives
+`event_digest` and also checks every duplicated receipt projection against it. If reviewed
+retention has removed the original payload, it cannot truthfully re-derive those deleted bytes;
+it instead requires a minimal tombstone and exactly one digest-checked `disposition` successor
+whose event ID, predecessor/root link, original digest, and disposition time agree. That check is
+reported as incomplete/documented disposition, never as an ordinary verifying event digest.
+
+`integrity` also carries `previous_event_digest`, `chain_scope`, and `chain_sequence` when
+chaining is on; per-category request-evidence binding digests, algorithm, key ID, and binding
+status; immutable timestamp/anchor attestation results; and `tier` plus `detects`, which state in
+the receipt itself exactly what the assurance level detects. See [the integrity guide](integrity.md).
+
+---
+
+## Canonicalization
+
+Receipts are digested and verified by code that may be years newer than the code that wrote
+them, and by verifiers written in other languages. So the bytes have to be reproducible from
+the data alone: no Ruby object serialization, no YAML, no hash insertion order, no database
+column order, no locale-dependent number formatting.
+
+The base is the [JSON Canonicalization Scheme, RFC 8785](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785)
+*(technical standard)*. Two of its rules bite in practice, and Clickwrap implements both
+explicitly rather than relying on Ruby's defaults:
+
+- **Object keys sort by UTF-16 code units**, not UTF-8 bytes. Ruby compares strings by UTF-8,
+  which orders characters outside the Basic Multilingual Plane differently, so keys are encoded
+  to UTF-16BE before comparison.
+- **Numbers follow the ECMAScript `Number::toString` algorithm.** Ruby writes `1.0` where
+  ECMAScript writes `1`, and `1.0e-05` where ECMAScript writes `0.00001`. Clickwrap rebuilds
+  the ECMAScript form from Ruby's shortest round-trip digits.
+
+Integers whose magnitude exceeds 2^53 − 1 raise rather than serialize, because they cannot
+survive the IEEE 754 double round trip RFC 8785 assumes and another verifier could not
+reproduce the bytes. Record large identifiers as strings.
+
+### The Clickwrap profile
+
+Five additions on top of RFC 8785. They exist so two verifiers never disagree about what a
+value meant:
+
+| Rule | Why |
+|---|---|
+| **Timestamps are UTC strings with exactly six fractional digits and a `Z` suffix** (`"2026-08-15T12:34:56.123456Z"`) | Fixed width, so nobody has to decide whether a trailing zero was significant. Local offsets and variable precision are two verifiers' worth of disagreement |
+| **Digests are `"<algorithm>:<lowercase hex>"`** (`"sha256:9f86d0…"`) | An auditor never has to guess which function produced a bare hex string, and a future release can add an algorithm without making old events unreadable. Keyed digests use `"hmac-sha256:…"` |
+| **Identifiers are strings, never numbers** | A numeric ID is a lossy round trip through a double and a formatting decision waiting to happen |
+| **A value that was never collected is an explicit state object**, never `null` and never a missing key | `null` and "absent" both mean four different things — not configured, unavailable, redacted, deleted. The state object says which |
+| **Host extensions use keys prefixed `x_`** | So a verifier can tell your additions from the schema's, and so your additions are still inside the digest |
+
+---
+
+## Verifying inside the application
+
+```ruby
+result = receipt.verify
+result.success?     # => true
+result.error        # => :declaration_expired, or nil
+result.message      # localized human explanation
+result.details      # stable machine-readable facts, no surprise personal data
+```
+
+This path has the database, so it checks what a file cannot: that the event's own digest still
+matches the row, that document-version rows still carry the digests the event recorded, that
+the lifecycle state is what the policy requires, and that chain links line up with their
+neighbours.
+
+Across the whole store, or one event:
+
+```bash
+bin/rails clickwrap:verify
+bin/rails clickwrap:verify EVENT_ID
+```
+
+Chain walks are their own operation and report their own vocabulary:
+
+```ruby
+result = Clickwrap::Integrity::Chain.verify
+result.success?      # => true
+result.counts        # => {"checked" => …, "verified" => …, "breaks" => 0, "scopes" => …}
+result.first_break   # => nil, or a Break with a stable `reason`
+```
+
+The break reasons are stable symbols so a monitor can branch on them without matching English:
+`digest_does_not_match`, `previous_digest_does_not_link`, `sequence_gap`,
+`earlier_events_missing`.
+
+---
+
+## Verifying outside the application
+
+```ruby
+Clickwrap::Receipt.verify(canonical_json, documents: document_files)
+```
+
+```bash
+clickwrap verify receipt.json --documents ./receipt-documents
+clickwrap verify receipt.json --documents ./receipt-documents --json
+```
+
+The CLI's dependency list is the feature. It requires JSON, the canonicalizer, the digest
+helpers, the error classes, and the version constants — no Rails, no Active Record, no
+database, no engine, no host application, no policy source, no network. A verifier that had to
+boot the application which produced the evidence could only ever tell you that the application
+agrees with itself.
+
+It runs the applicable checks below and reports each one as passed, failed, or **skipped**:
+
+| Check | What it does |
+|---|---|
+| `json_parses` | The file is a JSON object |
+| `known_schema` | The `schema` value is one this verifier knows. An unknown schema **stops** verification rather than guessing at the meaning of a newer format |
+| `canonical_bytes` | Whether the bytes are already canonical. Non-canonical bytes are re-canonicalized and reported, not failed — pretty-printing a receipt on its way through a bug tracker changes formatting, not meaning |
+| `receipt_digest` | The recorded digest matches the canonicalized body with only `integrity.receipt_digest` excluded |
+| `event_digest` | The embedded canonical event and every duplicated projection match the recorded event digest; disposed payloads take the documented-disposition path described above |
+| `lifecycle:<event_id>` | Every embedded successor's canonical body, digest, type, and root/predecessor relationship agree |
+| `integrity_attestation:<id>` | Every included attestation digest verifies and an upgraded tier has the exact verified capability it claims |
+| `document:<key>@<version>` | Each supplied file hashes to the digest the receipt recorded. A document whose bytes you did not bring is reported `not_supplied` |
+| `chain_linkage` | Chain fields, when present, are internally coherent. Not chained is reported as a configuration fact, not a finding |
+
+Three states, not two, everywhere. A check that could not run is neither a pass nor a failure,
+and collapsing it into either turns "we did not look" into "we looked and it was fine." A
+skipped check never makes a result succeed and never makes it fail; it stays visible.
+
+Files are matched to documents by key, version, and locale, most specific first:
+`terms-2026-08-15-en.md`, then `terms-2026-08-15.md`, then `terms.en.md`, then `terms.md`, then
+any file whose basename starts with `terms-`.
+
+Exit status is `0` when every required check passed, `1` when any check failed, and `2` when no
+check failed but a required document artifact was not supplied.
+
+---
+
+## What a successful verification does and does not establish
+
+It **does** establish:
+
+- the file is well-formed JSON in a receipt schema this verifier knows by name;
+- its bytes are canonical under RFC 8785, so two readers digest the same thing;
+- the digest the receipt carries matches the body it travels with, so accidental or ordinary
+  modification of those bytes is detected;
+- the embedded event body and duplicated receipt projections match the event digest, or the
+  receipt contains a coherent documented core disposition instead of pretending deleted bytes
+  were re-derived;
+- each document file you supplied hashes to the digest the receipt recorded for it; and
+- any chain links present are consistent with each other.
+
+It does **not** establish:
+
+- **that the receipt was not fabricated.** A self-contained file verifying against itself shows
+  internal consistency and nothing about origin. A party who controlled the application, the
+  database, and the export could have produced every byte in it, including the digest, and this
+  verifier would say "verified" — because the only thing it can compare the bytes against is
+  the bytes;
+- **when anything happened.** `recorded_at_by_server` is a time an application server wrote
+  down. It is the server's own clock, attested by nobody else;
+- **who acted.** An actor reference identifies a record in somebody's database, not a person;
+- **that a chain was not rewritten.** A single receipt can only show its own links are
+  coherent. Proving the chain itself is intact needs the neighbouring receipts and a head held
+  somewhere the database operator does not control;
+- **that any of it is sufficient, adequately presented, or admissible anywhere.** That is not a
+  property of a file.
+
+Origin and time evidence come from things this verifier cannot supply on its own: a verified
+outside publication of the exact event-chain snapshot, an RFC 3161 or trust-service token over
+the exact event digest, or a provider's own signed receipt. Where those exist they are reported as
+exactly the assurance they supply. Where they do not, their absence is visible rather than
+papered over by a check mark. Every result, in both the library and the CLI, prints that caveat
+alongside the verdict.
+
+---
+
+## Exporting
+
+```ruby
+Clickwrap.export_receipt(
+  receipt,
+  requested_by: current_operator,
+  because: "Investigate dispute 2026-184",
+  include_ip_address: false,
+  include_browser_user_agent: false,
+  include_ip_geolocation: false
+)
+```
+
+There is deliberately no `include_sensitive_context: true`. One flag that turns on three
+different categories of personal data is exactly the kind of option that makes an operator's
+intent unreviewable a year later.
+
+Naming any category as `true` requires a non-empty `because:` and a `true` from
+`config.authorize_unredacted_request_evidence_access_with`; the default callback returns
+`false` for everyone. Every export appends a `ReceiptAccess` row recording who asked, why, and
+which categories were included. Foreign event IDs return not found, so existence is not leaked.
+
+---
+
+## The golden-fixture policy
+
+Released evidence formats are permanent. That is a stronger promise than semantic versioning,
+and it has three parts the project holds itself to:
+
+1. **`ReceiptVerifier::KNOWN_SCHEMAS` only ever grows.** A new gem version may stop *creating*
+   an old schema. It must never stop *verifying* one, because receipts exported under it are
+   out in the world and their whole value is that they still check out years later.
+2. **A format change means a new explicit schema and a new branch of verification logic** —
+   never a silent reinterpretation of an old name. `CANONICAL_SCHEMA_VERSION` is deliberately
+   independent of the gem `VERSION`, and `VERIFIER_VERSION` moves only when receiver-side
+   verification changes in a way an auditor should be able to see in a receipt.
+3. **Every released receipt schema, canonicalization profile, digest field, event action, and
+   lifecycle meaning gets a permanent fixture**, and the suite verifies every previously
+   released format on every run. The fixtures live in `test/fixtures/receipts/` — real
+   receipts, byte for byte, exactly as an earlier version exported them — with their document
+   bytes beside them, and `test/golden_receipts_test.rb` runs the current verifier against all
+   of them. They are never regenerated. When a format legitimately changes, the correct move is
+   to add a fixture under the new schema name and leave the old ones alone: a fixture updated
+   to match new behavior has stopped testing anything.
+
+Two consequences for contributors. Anything touching public vocabulary or an evidence claim — a
+receipt field, a lifecycle meaning, a sentence a receipt prints about what it proves — needs
+the documentation change alongside the code plus a note on what happens to receipts already
+written under the old behavior. And released migrations are never edited underneath an
+installed application; upgrades add migrations and report their exact effects.
+
+---
+
+## Sources
+
+| Source | Class |
+|---|---|
+| [RFC 8785, JSON Canonicalization Scheme](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785) | Technical standard |
+| [NIST FIPS 180-4](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/180-4/upd1/final) — SHA-2 is a hash standard, not a signature, identity, or time source | Technical standard |
+| [RFC 3161](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3161/) — a separate time-stamp protocol | Technical standard |
+| The profile rules, the two-digest split, and the export design | Product-design inference |