avm-tools 0.129.0 → 0.129.1

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/doc/intro-to-subrepo.swim

@@ -1,387 +0,0 @@
-= Introducing Git Subrepos
-
-There is a new git command called `subrepo` that is meant to be a solid
-alternative to the `submodule` and `subtree` commands. All 3 of these commands
-allow you to include external repositories (pinned to specific commits) in
-your main repository. This is an often needed feature for project development
-under a source control system like Git. Unfortunately, the `submodule` command
-is severely lacking, and the `subtree` command (an attempt to make things
-better) is also very flawed. Fortunately, the `subrepo` command is here to
-save the day.
-
-This article will discuss how the previous commands work, and where they go
-wrong, while explaining how the new `subrepo` command fixes the issues.
-
-It should be noted that there are 3 distinct roles (ways people use repos)
-involved in discussing this topic:
-
-* *owner* — The primary author and repo owner
-* *collaborators* — Other developers who contribute to the repo
-* *users* — People who simply use the repo software
-
-== Introducing `subrepo`
-
-While the main point is to show how subrepo addresses the shortcomings of
-submodule and subtree, I'll start by giving a quick intro to the subrepo
-command.
-
-Let's say that you have a project repo called 'freebird' and you want to have
-it include 2 other external repos, 'lynyrd' and 'skynyrd'. You would do the
-following:
-
-  git clone git@github.com/you/freebird
-  cd freebird
-  git subrepo clone git@github.com/you/lynyrd ext/lynyrd
-  git subrepo clone git@github.com/you/skynyrd ext/skynyrd --branch=1975
-
-What these commands do (at a high level) should be obvious. They "clone"
-(add) the repos content into the subdirectories you told them to. The details
-of what is happening to your repo will be discussed later, but adding new
-subrepos is easy. If you need to update the subrepos later:
-
-  git subrepo pull ext/lynyrd
-  git subrepo pull ext/skynyrd --branch=1976
-
-The lynyrd repo is tracking the upstream master branch, and you've changed the
-skynyrd subrepo to the 1976 branch. Since these subrepos are owned by 'you',
-you might want to change them in the context of your freebird repo. When
-things are working, you can push the subrepo changes back:
-
-  git subrepo push ext/lynyrd
-  git subrepo push ext/skynyrd
-
-Looks simple right? It's supposed to be. The intent of `subrepo` is to do the
-right things, and to not cause problems.
-
-Of course there's more to it under the hood, and that's what the rest of this
-article is about.
-
-== Git Submodules
-
-Submodules tend to receive a lot of bad press. Here's some of it:
-
-* http://ayende.com/blog/4746/the-problem-with-git-submodules
-* http://somethingsinistral.net/blog/git-submodules-are-probably-not-the-answer/
-* http://codingkilledthecat.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/why-your-company-shouldnt-use-git-submodules/
-
-A quick recap of some of the good and bad things about submodules:
-
-Good:
-
-* Use an external repo in a dedicated subdir of your project.
-* Pin the external repo to a specific commit.
-* The `git-submodule` command is a core part of the Git project.
-
-Bad:
-
-* Users have to know a repo has submodules.
-* Users have to get the subrepos manually.
-* Pulling a repo with submodules won't pull in the new submodule changes.
-* A submodule will break if the referenced repo goes away.
-* A submodule will break if a forced push removes the referenced commit.
-* Can't use different submodules/commits per main project branch.
-* Can't "try out" a submodule on alternate branch.
-* Main repo can be pushed upstream pointing to unpushed submod commits.
-* Command capability differs across Git versions.
-* Often need to change remote url, to push submodule changes upstream.
-* Removing or renaming a submodule requires many steps.
-
-Internally, submodules are a real mess. They give the strong impression of
-being bolted on, well after Git was designed. Some commands are aware of the
-existence of submodules (although usually half-heartedly), and many commands
-are oblivious. For instance the git-clone command has a `--recursive` option
-to clone all subrepos, but it's not a default, so you still need to be aware
-of the need. The git-checkout command does nothing with the submodules, even
-if they are intended to differ across branches.
-
-Let's talk a bit about how submodules are implemented in Git. Information
-about them is stored in 3 different places (in the top level repo directory):
-
-* `.gitmodules`
-* `.git/config`
-* `.git/modules` — The submodule repo's meta data (refs/objects)
-
-So some of the information lives in the repo history (.gitmodules), but other
-info (.git/) is only known to the local repo.
-
-In addition, the submodule introduces a new low level concept, to the
-commit/tree/blob graph. Normally a git tree object points to blob (file)
-objects and more tree (directory) objects. Submodules have tree objects point
-to *commit* objects. While this seems clever and somewhat reasonable, it also
-means that every other git command (which was built on the super clean Git
-data model) has to be aware of this new possibility (and deal with it
-appropriately).
-
-The point is that, while submodules are a real need, and a lot of work has
-gone into making them work decently, they are essentially a kludge to the Git
-model, and it is quite understandable why they haven't worked out as well as
-people would expect.
-
-NOTE: Submodules /are/ getting better with each release of Git, but it's still
-an endless catch up game.
-
-== Git Subtrees
-
-One day, someone decided to think different. Instead of pointing to external
-repos, why not just include them into the main repo (but also allow them to be
-pulled and pushed separately as needed)?
-
-At first this may feel like a wasteful approach. Why keep other repos
-physically inside your main one? But if you think about it abstractly, what's
-the difference? You want your users and collaborators to have all this code
-because your project needs it. So why worry about how it happens? In the end,
-the choice is yours, but I've grown very comfortable with this concept and
-I'll try to justify it well. I should note that the first paragraph of the
-`submodule` doc suggests considering this alternative.
-
-The big win here is that you can do this using the existing git model.
-Nothing new is added. You are just adding commits to a history. You can do it
-different on every branch. You can merge branches sensibly.
-
-The git-subtree command seems to have been inspired by Git's subtree merge
-strategy, which it uses internally, and possibly got its name from. A subtree
-merge allows you to take a completely separate Git history and make it be a
-subdirectory of your repo.
-
-Adding a subtree was the easy part. All that needed to be done after that was
-to figure out a way to pull upstream changes and push local ones back
-upstream. And that's what the `git-subtree` command does.
-
-So what's the problem with git-subtree then?
-
-Well unfortunately, it drops a few balls. The main problems come down to an
-overly complicated commandline UX, poor collaborator awareness, and a fragile
-and messy implementation.
-
-Good:
-
-* Use an external repo in a dedicated subdir of your project.
-* Pin the external repo to a specific commit.
-* Users get everything with a normal clone command.
-* Users don't need to know that subtrees are involved.
-* Can use different submodules/commits per main project branch.
-* Users don't need the subtree command. Only owners and collaborators.
-
-Bad:
-* The remote url and branch info is not saved (except in the history).
-* Owners and collaborators have to enter the remote for every command.
-* Collaborators aren't made aware that subtrees are involved.
-* Pulled history is not squashed by default.
-* Creates a messy historical view. (See below)
-* Bash code is complicated.
-* Only one test file. Currently is failing.
-
-As you can see, subtree makes quite a few things better, but after trying it
-for a while, the experience was more annoying than submodules. For example,
-consider this usage:
-
-  $ git subtree add --squash --prefix=foo git@github.com:my/thing mybranch
-  # weeks go by…
-  $ git subtree pull --squash --prefix=foo git@github.com:my/thing mybranch
-  # time to push local subtree changes back upstream
-  $ git subtree push --prefix=foo git@github.com:my/thing mybranch
-
-The first thing you notice is the overly verbose syntax. It's justified in the
-first command, but in the other 2 commands I really don't want to have to
-remember what the remote and branch are that I'm using.
-
-Moreover, my collaborators have no idea that subtrees are involved, let alone
-where they came from.
-
-Consider the equivalent subrepo commands:
-
-  $ git subrepo clone git@github.com:my/thing foo -b mybranch
-  $ git subrepo pull foo
-  $ git subrepo push foo
-
-Collaborators see a file called 'foo/.gitrepo', and know that the subdir is a
-subrepo. The file contains all the information needed by future commands
-applied to that subrepo.
-
-== Git Subrepos
-
-Now is a good time to dive into the techinical aspects of the `subrepo`
-command, but first let me explain how it came about.
-
-As you may have surmised by now, I am the author of git-subrepo. I'd used
-submodules on and off for years, and when I became aware of subtree I gave it
-a try, but I quickly realized its problems. I decided maybe it could be
-improved. I decided to write down my expected commandline usage and my ideals
-of what it would and would not do. Then I set off to implement it. It's been a
-long road, but what I ended up with was even better than what I wanted from
-the start.
-
-Let's review the Goods and Bads:
-
-Good:
-
-* Use an external repo in a dedicated subdir of your project.
-* Pin the external repo to a specific commit.
-* Users get everything with a normal clone command.
-* Users don't need to know that subrepos are involved.
-* Can use different submodules/commits per main project branch.
-* Meta info is kept in an obvious place.
-* Everyone knows when a subdir is a subrepo.
-* Commandline UX is minimal and intuitive.
-* Pulled history is always squashed out locally.
-* Pushed history is kept intact.
-* Creates a clean historical view. (See below)
-* Bash code is very simple and easy to follow.
-* Comprehensive test suite. Currently passing on travis:
-
-<badge travis ingydotnet/git-subrepo>
-
-Bad:
-
-* --Subrepo is very new.-- (no longer true)
-* --Not well tested in the wild.-- (no longer true)
-
-This review may seem somewhat slanted, but I honestly am not aware of any
-"bad" points that I'm not disclosing. That said, I am sure time will reveal
-bugs and shortcomings. Those can usually be fixed. Hopefully the *model* is
-correct, because that's harder to fix down the road.
-
-OK. So how does it all work?
-
-There are 3 main commands: clone/pull/push. Let's start with the clone
-command. This is the easiest part. You give it a remote url, possibly a new
-subdir to put it, and possibly a remote branch to use. I say possibly, because
-the command can guess the subdir name (just like the git-clone command does),
-and the branch can be the upstream default branch.
-
-Given this we do the following steps internally:
-
-* Fetch the remote content (for a specific refspec)
-* Read the remote head tree into the index
-* Checkout the index into the new subdir
-* Create a new subrepo commit object for the subdir content
-* Add a state file called .gitrepo to the new subrepo/subdir
-* Amend the merge commit with this new file
-
-This process adds something like this to the top of your history:
-
-  * 9b6ddc9 git subrepo clone git@github.com:you/foo.git foo/
-  * 37c61a5 Previous head commit of your repo
-
-The entire history has been squashed down into one commit, and placed on top of
-your history.  This is important as it keeps your history as clean as possible.
-You don't need to have the subrepo history in your main project, since it is
-immutably available elsewhere, and you have a pointer to that place.
-
-The new foo/.gitrepo file looks like this:
-
-  [subrepo]
-          remote = git@github.com:you/foo.git
-          branch = master
-          commit = 14c96c6931b41257b2d42b2edc67ddc659325823
-          parent = 37c61a5a234f5dd6f5c2aec037509f50d3a79b8f
-          cmdver = 0.1.0
-
-It contains all the info needed now and later. Note that the repo url is the
-generally pushable form, rather than the publically readable (https://…) form.
-This is the best practice. Users of your repo don't need access to this url,
-because the content is already in your repo. Only you and your collaborators
-need this url to pull/push in the future.
-
-The next command is the pull command. Normally you just give it the subrepo's
-subdir path (although you can change the branch with -b), and it will get the
-other info from the subdir/.gitrepo file.
-
-The pull command does these steps:
-
-* Fetch the upstream content
-* Check if anything needs pulling
-* Create a branch of local subrepo commits since last pull
-* Rebase this branch onto the upstream commits
-* Commit the HEAD of the rebased content
-* Update/amend the .gitrepo file
-
-=== Clean History
-
-I've talked a bit about clean history but let me show you a comparison between
-subrepo and subtree. Let's run this command sequence using both methods. Note
-the differences between /both/ the command syntax required, and the branch
-history produced.
-
-Subrepo first:
-
-  $ git subrepo clone git@github.com:user/abc
-  $ git subrepo clone git@github.com:user/def xyz
-  $ git subrepo pull abc
-  $ git subrepo pull xyz
-
-The resulting history is:
-
-  * b1f60cc subrepo pull xyz
-  * 4fb0276 subrepo pull abc
-  * bcef2a0 subrepo clone git@github.com:user/def xyz
-  * bebf0db subrepo clone git@github.com:user/abc
-  * 64eeaa6 (origin/master, origin/HEAD) O HAI FREND
-
-Compare that to *subtree*. This:
-
-  $ git subtree add abc git@github.com:user/abc master
-  $ git subtree add xyz git@github.com:user/def master
-  $ git subtree pull abc git@github.com:user/abc master
-  $ git subtree pull xyz git@github.com:user/def master
-
-Produces this:
-
-  * 739e45a (HEAD, master) Merge commit '5f563469d886d53e19cb908b3a64e4229f88a2d1'
-  |\
-  | * 5f56346 Squashed 'xyz/' changes from 08c7421..365409f
-  * | 641f5e5 Merge commit '8d88e90ce5f653ed2e7608a71b8693a2174ea62a'
-  |\ \
-  | * | 8d88e90 Squashed 'abc/' changes from 08c7421..365409f
-  * | | 1703ed2 Merge commit '0e091b672c4bbbbf6bc4f6694c475d127ffa21eb' as 'xyz'
-  |\ \ \
-  | | |/
-  | |/|
-  | * | 0e091b6 Squashed 'xyz/' content from commit 08c7421
-  | /
-  * | 07b77e7 Merge commit 'cd2b30a0229d931979ed4436b995875ec563faea' as 'abc'
-  |\ \
-  | |/
-  | * cd2b30a Squashed 'abc/' content from commit 08c7421
-  * 64eeaa6 (origin/master, origin/HEAD) O HAI FREND
-
-This was from a minimal case. Subtree history (when viewed this way at least)
-gets unreasonably ugly fast. Subrepo history, by contrast, always looks as
-clean as shown.
-
-The final command, push, bascially just does the pull/rebase dance above
-described, and pushes the resulting history back. It does not squash the
-commits made locally, because it assumed that when you changed the local
-subrepo, you made messages that were intended to eventually be published back
-upstream.
-
-== Conflict Resolution
-
-The commands described above can also be done "by hand". If something fails
-during a pull or push (generally in the rebasing) then the command will tell
-you what to do to finish up.
-
-You might choose to do everything by hand, and do your own merging strategies.
-This is perfectly reasonable. The `subrepo` command offers a few other helper
-commands to help you get the job done:
-
-* `fetch` - Fetch the upstream and create a `subrepo/remote/<subdir>` ref.
-* `branch` - Create a branch of local subdir commits since the last pull,
-  called `subrepo/<subdir>`.
-* `commit` - Commit a merged branch's HEAD back into your repo.
-* `status` - Show lots of useful info about the current state of the subrepos.
-* `clean` - Remove branches, ref and remotes created by subrepo commands.
-* `help` - Read the complete documentation!
-
-== Conclusion
-
-Hopefully by now, you see that submodules are a painful choice with a dubious
-future, and that subtree, while a solid idea has many usage issues.
-
-Give `subrepo` a try. It's painless, easily revertable and just might be what
-the doctor ordered.
-
-== Reference Links
-
-* http://longair.net/blog/2010/06/02/git-submodules-explained/
-* http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/05/alternatives-to-git-submodule-git-subtree/

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/Changes

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
----
-version: 0.0.7
-date:    Sat Jan 23 16:28:59 PST 2016
-changes:
-- Update tooling, and copyright
----
-version: 0.0.6
-date:    Fri Jan 23 21:05:15 PST 2015
-changes:
-- Update tooling, and copyright
----
-version: 0.0.1
-date:    Sun Oct 27 19:07:51 PDT 2013
-changes:
-- First release.

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/License

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-(The MIT License)
-
-Copyright © 2013-2016 Ingy döt Net
-
-Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
-this software and associated documentation files (the ‘Software’), to deal in
-the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to
-use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies
-of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do
-so, subject to the following conditions:
-
-The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
-copies or substantial portions of the Software.
-
-THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
-IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
-FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
-AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
-LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
-OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
-SOFTWARE.

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/Makefile

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),install)
-  ifeq "$(shell bpan version 2>/dev/null)" ""
-    $(error 'BPAN not installed. See http://bpan.org')
-  endif
-endif
-
-NAME := bash+
-LIB  := lib/$(NAME).bash
-DOC  := doc/$(NAME).swim
-MAN1 := man/man1
-MAN3 := man/man3
-
-INSTALL_LIB  ?= $(shell bpan env BPAN_LIB)
-INSTALL_DIR  ?= test
-INSTALL_MAN1 ?= $(shell bpan env BPAN_MAN1)
-INSTALL_MAN3 ?= $(shell bpan env BPAN_MAN3)
-
-default: help
-
-help:
-	@echo 'Rules: test, install, doc'
-
-.PHONY: test
-test:
-	prove $(PROVEOPT:%=% )test/
-
-install:
-	install -C -d -m 0755 $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_DIR)/
-	install -C -m 0755 $(LIB) $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_DIR)/
-	install -C -d -m 0755 $(INSTALL_MAN1)/
-	install -C -d -m 0755 $(INSTALL_MAN3)/
-	install -C -m 0644 $(MAN1)/$(NAME).1 $(INSTALL_MAN1)/
-	install -C -m 0644 $(MAN3)/$(NAME).3 $(INSTALL_MAN3)/
-
-.PHONY: doc
-doc: ReadMe.pod $(MAN1)/$(NAME).1 $(MAN3)/$(NAME).3
-
-ReadMe.pod: $(DOC)
-	swim --to=pod --complete --wrap $< > $@
-
-$(MAN1)/%.1: doc/%.swim
-	swim --to=man $< > $@
-
-$(MAN3)/%.3: doc/%.swim
-	swim --to=man $< > $@

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/Meta

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-=meta: 0.0.2
-
-name: bashplus
-version: 0.0.7
-abstract: Modern Bash Programming
-homepage: http://bpan.org/package/bashplus/
-
-license: MIT
-copyright: 2013-2016
-author:
-  name: Ingy döt Net
-  email: ingy@ingy.net
-  github: ingydotnet
-  twitter: ingydotnet
-  freenode: ingy
-  homepage: http://ingy.net
-
-requires:
-  bash: 3.2.0
-test:
-  cmd: make test
-install:
-  cmd: make install
-
-devel:
-  git: git@github.org/ingydotnet/bashplus
-  irc: irc.freenode.net/bpan
-  bug: https://github.com/ingydotnet/bashplus/issues/

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/ReadMe.pod

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-=pod
-
-=for comment
-DO NOT EDIT. This Pod was generated by Swim v0.1.41.
-See http://github.com/ingydotnet/swim-pm#readme
-
-=encoding utf8
-
-=head1 Name
-
-Bash+(1) - Modern Bash Programming
-
-=for html
-<a href="https://travis-ci.org/ingydotnet/bashplus"><img src="https://travis-ci.org/ingydotnet/bashplus.png" alt="bashplus"></a>
-
-=head1 Synopsis
-
-    source bash+ :std :array
-
-    use Foo::Bar this that
-
-    Array.new args "$@"
-
-    if args.empty?; then
-      die "I need args!"
-    fi
-
-    Foo::Bar.new foo args
-
-    this is awesome     # <= this is a real command! (You just imported it)
-
-=head1 Description
-
-Bash+ is just Bash... B<plus> some libraries that can make Bash programming a
-lot nicer.
-
-=for comment # Installation
-
-Get the source code from GitHub:
-
-    git clone git@github.com:ingydotnet/bashplus
-
-Then run:
-
-    make test
-    make install        # Possibly with 'sudo'
-
-=head1 Usage
-
-For now look at some libraries the use Bash+:
-
-=over
-
-=item * L<https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-hub>
-
-=item * L<https://github.com/ingydotnet/json-bash>
-
-=item * L<https://github.com/ingydotnet/test-more-bash>
-
-=back
-
-=head1 Status
-
-If you are interested in chatting about this, C</join #bpan> on
-irc.freenode.net.
-
-=head1 Author
-
-Written by Ingy döt Net <ingy@ingy.net>
-
-=head1 Copyright & License
-
-Copyright 2013-2016. Ingy döt Net.
-
-The MIT License (MIT).
-
-=cut

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/bin/bash+

@@ -1,43 +0,0 @@
-#!/usr/bin/env bash
-#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Bash+ - Modern Bash Programming
-#
-# Copyright (c) 2013-2016 Ingy döt Net
-#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-set -e
-shopt -s compat31&>/dev/null||:
-
-#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Determine how `bash+` was called, and do the right thing:
-#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-if [ "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" != "$0" ]; then
-  # 'bash+' is being sourced:
-  [[ "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" =~ /bin/bash\\+$ ]] || {
-    echo "Invalid Bash+ path '${BASH_SOURCE[0]}'" 2> /dev/null
-    exit 1
-  }
-  source "${BASH_SOURCE[0]%/bin/*}"/lib/bash+.bash || return $?
-  bash+:import "$@"
-  return $?
-else
-  if [ $# -eq 1 -a "$1" == --version ]; then
-    echo 'bash+   version 0.0.7'
-  else
-  cat <<...
-
-Greetings modern Bash programmer. Welcome to Bash+!
-
-Bash+ is framework that makes Bash programming more like Ruby and Perl.
-
-See: https://github.com/bpan-org/bashplus
-
-If you got here trying to use bash+ in a program, you need to source it:
-
-    source bash+
-
-Happy Bash Hacking!
-
-...
-  fi
-fi

data/sub/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/ext/bashplus/doc/bash+.swim

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-Bash+(1)
-========
-
-Modern Bash Programming
-
-<badge travis ingydotnet/bashplus>
-
-= Synopsis
-
-  source bash+ :std :array
-
-  use Foo::Bar this that
-
-  Array.new args "$@"
-
-  if args.empty?; then
-    die "I need args!"
-  fi
-
-  Foo::Bar.new foo args
-
-  this is awesome     # <= this is a real command! (You just imported it)
-
-= Description
-
-Bash+ is just Bash... *plus* some libraries that can make Bash programming a
-lot nicer.
-
-## Installation
-
-Get the source code from GitHub:
-
-  git clone git@github.com:ingydotnet/bashplus
-
-Then run:
-
-  make test
-  make install        # Possibly with 'sudo'
-
-= Usage
-
-For now look at some libraries the use Bash+:
-
-* https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-hub
-* https://github.com/ingydotnet/json-bash
-* https://github.com/ingydotnet/test-more-bash
-
-= Status
-
-If you are interested in chatting about this, `/join #bpan` on
-irc.freenode.net.
-
-= Author
-
-Written by Ingy döt Net <ingy@ingy.net>
-
-= Copyright & License
-
-Copyright 2013-2016. Ingy döt Net.
-
-The MIT License (MIT).