validmind 2.3.5__py3-none-any.whl → 2.4.1__py3-none-any.whl

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/Bias.py

@@ -75,10 +75,8 @@ class Bias(ThresholdTest):
     name = "bias"
     required_inputs = ["model.prompt"]
     default_params = {"min_threshold": 7}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = """
 You are a prompt evaluation AI. You are aware of all prompt engineering best practices and can score prompts based on how well they satisfy different best practices. You analyse the prompts step-by-step based on provided documentation and provide a score and an explanation for how you produced that score.

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/Clarity.py

@@ -64,10 +64,8 @@ class Clarity(ThresholdTest):
     name = "clarity"
     required_inputs = ["model.prompt"]
     default_params = {"min_threshold": 7}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = """
 You are a prompt evaluation AI. You are aware of all prompt engineering best practices and can score prompts based on how well they satisfy different metrics. You analyse the prompts step-by-step based on provided documentation and provide a score and an explanation for how you produced that score.

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/Conciseness.py

@@ -64,10 +64,8 @@ class Conciseness(ThresholdTest):
     name = "conciseness"
     required_inputs = ["model.prompt"]
     default_params = {"min_threshold": 7}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = """
 You are a prompt evaluation AI. You are aware of all prompt engineering best practices and can score prompts based on how well they satisfy different metrics. You analyse the prompts step-by-step based on provided documentation and provide a score and an explanation for how you produced that score.

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/Delimitation.py

@@ -66,10 +66,8 @@ class Delimitation(ThresholdTest):
     name = "delimitation"
     required_inputs = ["model.prompt"]
     default_params = {"min_threshold": 7}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = """
 You are a prompt evaluation AI. You are aware of all prompt engineering best practices and can score prompts based on how well they satisfy different metrics. You analyse the prompts step-by-step based on provided documentation and provide a score and an explanation for how you produced that score.

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/NegativeInstruction.py

@@ -70,10 +70,8 @@ class NegativeInstruction(ThresholdTest):
     name = "negative_instruction"
     required_inputs = ["model.prompt"]
     default_params = {"min_threshold": 7}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = """
 You are a prompt evaluation AI. You are aware of all prompt engineering best practices and can score prompts based on how well they satisfy different metrics. You analyse the prompts step-by-step based on provided documentation and provide a score and an explanation for how you produced that score.

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/Robustness.py

@@ -60,10 +60,8 @@ class Robustness(ThresholdTest):
     name = "robustness"
     required_inputs = ["model"]
     default_params = {"num_tests": 10}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = '''
 You are a prompt evaluation researcher AI who is tasked with testing the robustness of LLM prompts.

validmind/tests/prompt_validation/Specificity.py

@@ -66,10 +66,8 @@ class Specificity(ThresholdTest):
     name = "specificity"
     required_inputs = ["model.prompt"]
     default_params = {"min_threshold": 7}
-    metadata = {
-        "task_types": ["text_classification", "text_summarization"],
-        "tags": ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"],
-    }
+    tasks = ["text_classification", "text_summarization"]
+    tags = ["llm", "zero_shot", "few_shot"]
 
     system_prompt = """
 You are a prompt evaluation AI. You are aware of all prompt engineering best practices and can score prompts based on how well they satisfy different metrics. You analyse the prompts step-by-step based on provided documentation and provide a score and an explanation for how you produced that score.

validmind/tests/run.py

@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
+# Copyright © 2023-2024 ValidMind Inc. All rights reserved.
+# See the LICENSE file in the root of this repository for details.
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0 AND ValidMind Commercial
+
+from itertools import product
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Union
+from uuid import uuid4
+
+import pandas as pd
+
+from validmind.ai.test_descriptions import get_description_metadata
+from validmind.errors import LoadTestError
+from validmind.logging import get_logger
+from validmind.unit_metrics import run_metric
+from validmind.unit_metrics.composite import load_composite_metric
+from validmind.vm_models import (
+    MetricResult,
+    ResultSummary,
+    ResultTable,
+    TestContext,
+    TestInput,
+    ThresholdTestResults,
+)
+from validmind.vm_models.figure import is_matplotlib_figure, is_plotly_figure
+from validmind.vm_models.test.result_wrapper import (
+    MetricResultWrapper,
+    ThresholdTestResultWrapper,
+)
+
+from .__types__ import TestID
+from .load import load_test
+
+logger = get_logger(__name__)
+
+
+def _cartesian_product(input_grid: Dict[str, List[Any]]):
+    """Get all possible combinations for a set of inputs"""
+    return [dict(zip(input_grid, values)) for values in product(*input_grid.values())]
+
+
+def _combine_summaries(summaries: List[Dict[str, Any]]):
+    """Combine the summaries from multiple results
+
+    Args:
+        summaries (List[Dict[str, Any]]): A list of dictionaries where each dictionary
+            has two keys: "inputs" and "summary". The "inputs" key should contain the
+            inputs used for the test and the "summary" key should contain the actual
+            summary object.
+
+    Constraint: The summaries must all have the same structure meaning that each has
+    the same number of tables in the same order with the same columns etc. This
+    should always be the case for comparison tests since its the same test run
+    multiple times with different inputs.
+    """
+    if not summaries[0]["summary"]:
+        return None
+
+    def combine_tables(table_index):
+        combined_df = pd.DataFrame()
+
+        for summary_obj in summaries:
+            serialized = summary_obj["summary"].results[table_index].serialize()
+            summary_df = pd.DataFrame(serialized["data"])
+            summary_df = pd.concat(
+                [
+                    pd.DataFrame(summary_obj["inputs"], index=summary_df.index),
+                    summary_df,
+                ],
+                axis=1,
+            )
+            combined_df = pd.concat([combined_df, summary_df], ignore_index=True)
+
+        return ResultTable(
+            data=combined_df.to_dict(orient="records"),
+            metadata=summaries[0]["summary"].results[table_index].metadata,
+        )
+
+    return ResultSummary(
+        results=[
+            combine_tables(table_index)
+            for table_index in range(len(summaries[0]["summary"].results))
+        ]
+    )
+
+
+def _update_plotly_titles(figures, input_groups, title_template):
+    current_title = figures[0].figure.layout.title.text
+
+    for i, figure in enumerate(figures):
+        figure.figure.layout.title.text = title_template.format(
+            current_title=f"{current_title} " if current_title else "",
+            input_description=", ".join(
+                f"{k}={v if isinstance(v, str) else v.input_id}"
+                for k, v in input_groups[i].items()
+            ),
+        )
+
+
+def _update_matplotlib_titles(figures, input_groups, title_template):
+    current_title = figures[0].figure.get_title()
+
+    for i, figure in enumerate(figures):
+        figure.figure.suptitle(
+            title_template.format(
+                current_title=f"{current_title} " if current_title else "",
+                input_description=" and ".join(
+                    f"{k}: {v if isinstance(v, str) else v.input_id}"
+                    for k, v in input_groups[i].items()
+                ),
+            )
+        )
+
+
+def _combine_figures(figure_lists: List[List[Any]], input_groups: List[Dict[str, Any]]):
+    """Combine the figures from multiple results"""
+    if not figure_lists[0]:
+        return None
+
+    title_template = "{current_title}({input_description})"
+
+    for i, figures in enumerate(list(zip(*figure_lists))):
+        if is_plotly_figure(figures[0].figure):
+            _update_plotly_titles(figures, input_groups, title_template)
+        elif is_matplotlib_figure(figures[0].figure):
+            _update_matplotlib_titles(figures, input_groups, title_template)
+        else:
+            logger.warning("Cannot properly annotate png figures")
+
+    return [figure for figures in figure_lists for figure in figures]
+
+
+def metric_comparison(
+    results: List[MetricResultWrapper],
+    test_id: TestID,
+    input_groups: Union[Dict[str, List[Any]], List[Dict[str, Any]]],
+    output_template: str = None,
+    generate_description: bool = True,
+):
+    """Build a comparison result for multiple metric results"""
+    ref_id = str(uuid4())
+
+    input_group_strings = [
+        {k: v if isinstance(v, str) else v.input_id for k, v in group.items()}
+        for group in input_groups
+    ]
+
+    merged_summary = _combine_summaries(
+        [
+            {"inputs": input_group_strings[i], "summary": result.metric.summary}
+            for i, result in enumerate(results)
+        ]
+    )
+    merged_figures = _combine_figures(
+        [result.figures for result in results], input_groups
+    )
+
+    # Patch figure metadata so they are connected to the comparison result
+    if merged_figures and len(merged_figures):
+        for i, figure in enumerate(merged_figures):
+            figure.key = f"{figure.key}-{i}"
+            figure.metadata["_name"] = test_id
+            figure.metadata["_ref_id"] = ref_id
+
+    return MetricResultWrapper(
+        result_id=test_id,
+        result_metadata=[
+            get_description_metadata(
+                test_id=test_id,
+                default_description=f"Comparison test result for {test_id}",
+                summary=merged_summary.serialize() if merged_summary else None,
+                figures=merged_figures,
+                should_generate=generate_description,
+            ),
+        ],
+        inputs=[
+            input if isinstance(input, str) else input.input_id
+            for group in input_groups
+            for input in group.values()
+        ],
+        output_template=output_template,
+        metric=MetricResult(
+            key=test_id,
+            ref_id=ref_id,
+            value=[],
+            summary=merged_summary,
+        ),
+        figures=merged_figures,
+    )
+
+
+def threshold_test_comparison(
+    results: List[ThresholdTestResultWrapper],
+    test_id: TestID,
+    input_groups: Union[Dict[str, List[Any]], List[Dict[str, Any]]],
+    output_template: str = None,
+    generate_description: bool = True,
+):
+    """Build a comparison result for multiple threshold test results"""
+    ref_id = str(uuid4())
+
+    input_group_strings = [
+        {k: v if isinstance(v, str) else v.input_id for k, v in group.items()}
+        for group in input_groups
+    ]
+
+    merged_summary = _combine_summaries(
+        [
+            {"inputs": input_group_strings[i], "summary": result.test_results.summary}
+            for i, result in enumerate(results)
+        ]
+    )
+    merged_figures = _combine_figures(
+        [result.figures for result in results], input_groups
+    )
+
+    # Patch figure metadata so they are connected to the comparison result
+    if merged_figures and len(merged_figures):
+        for i, figure in enumerate(merged_figures):
+            figure.key = f"{figure.key}-{i}"
+            figure.metadata["_name"] = test_id
+            figure.metadata["_ref_id"] = ref_id
+
+    return ThresholdTestResultWrapper(
+        result_id=test_id,
+        result_metadata=[
+            get_description_metadata(
+                test_id=test_id,
+                default_description=f"Comparison test result for {test_id}",
+                summary=merged_summary.serialize() if merged_summary else None,
+                figures=merged_figures,
+                prefix="test_description",
+                should_generate=generate_description,
+            )
+        ],
+        inputs=[
+            input if isinstance(input, str) else input.input_id
+            for group in input_groups
+            for input in group.values()
+        ],
+        output_template=output_template,
+        test_results=ThresholdTestResults(
+            test_name=test_id,
+            ref_id=ref_id,
+            # TODO: when we have param_grid support, this will need to be updated
+            params=results[0].test_results.params,
+            passed=all(result.test_results.passed for result in results),
+            results=[],
+            summary=merged_summary,
+        ),
+        figures=merged_figures,
+    )
+
+
+def run_comparison_test(
+    test_id: TestID,
+    input_grid: Union[Dict[str, List[Any]], List[Dict[str, Any]]],
+    params: Dict[str, Any] = None,
+    show: bool = True,
+    output_template: str = None,
+    generate_description: bool = True,
+):
+    """Run a comparison test"""
+    if isinstance(input_grid, dict):
+        input_groups = _cartesian_product(input_grid)
+    else:
+        input_groups = input_grid
+
+    results = [
+        run_test(
+            test_id,
+            inputs=inputs,
+            show=False,
+            params=params,
+            __generate_description=False,
+        )
+        for inputs in input_groups
+    ]
+
+    if isinstance(results[0], MetricResultWrapper):
+        func = metric_comparison
+    else:
+        func = threshold_test_comparison
+
+    result = func(results, test_id, input_groups, output_template, generate_description)
+
+    if show:
+        result.show()
+
+    return result
+
+
+def run_test(
+    test_id: TestID = None,
+    params: Dict[str, Any] = None,
+    inputs: Dict[str, Any] = None,
+    input_grid: Union[Dict[str, List[Any]], List[Dict[str, Any]]] = None,
+    name: str = None,
+    unit_metrics: List[TestID] = None,
+    output_template: str = None,
+    show: bool = True,
+    __generate_description: bool = True,
+    **kwargs,
+) -> Union[MetricResultWrapper, ThresholdTestResultWrapper]:
+    """Run a test by test ID
+
+    Args:
+        test_id (TestID, optional): The test ID to run. Not required if `unit_metrics` is provided.
+        params (dict, optional): A dictionary of parameters to pass into the test. Params
+            are used to customize the test behavior and are specific to each test. See the
+            test details for more information on the available parameters. Defaults to None.
+        inputs (Dict[str, Any], optional): A dictionary of test inputs to pass into the
+            test. Inputs are either models or datasets that have been initialized using
+            vm.init_model() or vm.init_dataset(). Defaults to None.
+        input_grid (Union[Dict[str, List[Any]], List[Dict[str, Any]]], optional): To run
+            a comparison test, provide either a dictionary of inputs where the keys are
+            the input names and the values are lists of different inputs, or a list of
+            dictionaries where each dictionary is a set of inputs to run the test with.
+            This will run the test multiple times with different sets of inputs and then
+            combine the results into a single output. When passing a dictionary, the grid
+            will be created by taking the Cartesian product of the input lists. Its simply
+            a more convenient way of forming the input grid as opposed to passing a list of
+            all possible combinations. Defaults to None.
+        name (str, optional): The name of the test (used to create a composite metric
+            out of multiple unit metrics) - required when running multiple unit metrics
+        unit_metrics (list, optional): A list of unit metric IDs to run as a composite
+            metric - required when running multiple unit metrics
+        output_template (str, optional): A jinja2 html template to customize the output
+            of the test. Defaults to None.
+        show (bool, optional): Whether to display the results. Defaults to True.
+        **kwargs: Keyword inputs to pass into the test (same as `inputs` but as keyword
+            args instead of a dictionary):
+            - dataset: A validmind Dataset object or a Pandas DataFrame
+            - model: A model to use for the test
+            - models: A list of models to use for the test
+            - dataset: A validmind Dataset object or a Pandas DataFrame
+    """
+    if not test_id and not name and not unit_metrics:
+        raise ValueError(
+            "`test_id` or `name` and `unit_metrics` must be provided to run a test"
+        )
+
+    if (unit_metrics and not name) or (name and not unit_metrics):
+        raise ValueError("`name` and `unit_metrics` must be provided together")
+
+    if (input_grid and kwargs) or (input_grid and inputs):
+        raise ValueError(
+            "When providing an `input_grid`, you cannot also provide `inputs` or `kwargs`"
+        )
+
+    if input_grid:
+        return run_comparison_test(
+            test_id,
+            input_grid,
+            params=params,
+            output_template=output_template,
+            show=show,
+            generate_description=__generate_description,
+        )
+
+    if test_id and test_id.startswith("validmind.unit_metrics"):
+        # TODO: as we move towards a more unified approach to metrics
+        # we will want to make everything functional and remove the
+        # separation between unit metrics and "normal" metrics
+        return run_metric(test_id, inputs=inputs, params=params, show=show)
+
+    if unit_metrics:
+        metric_id_name = "".join(word[0].upper() + word[1:] for word in name.split())
+        test_id = f"validmind.composite_test.{metric_id_name}"
+
+        error, TestClass = load_composite_metric(
+            unit_metrics=unit_metrics, metric_name=metric_id_name
+        )
+
+        if error:
+            raise LoadTestError(error)
+
+    else:
+        TestClass = load_test(test_id, reload=True)
+
+    test = TestClass(
+        test_id=test_id,
+        context=TestContext(),
+        inputs=TestInput({**kwargs, **(inputs or {})}),
+        output_template=output_template,
+        params=params,
+        generate_description=__generate_description,
+    )
+
+    test.run()
+
+    if show:
+        test.result.show()
+
+    return test.result

validmind/tests/test_providers.py

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ from typing import Protocol
 
 from validmind.logging import get_logger
 
+from ._store import test_provider_store
+
 logger = get_logger(__name__)
 
 
@@ -145,3 +147,13 @@ class LocalTestProvider:
             raise LocalTestProviderLoadTestError(
                 f"Failed to find the test class in the module. Error: {str(e)}"
             )
+
+
+def register_test_provider(namespace: str, test_provider: "TestProvider") -> None:
+    """Register an external test provider
+
+    Args:
+        namespace (str): The namespace of the test provider
+        test_provider (TestProvider): The test provider
+    """
+    test_provider_store.register_test_provider(namespace, test_provider)

validmind/tests/utils.py

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# Copyright © 2023-2024 ValidMind Inc. All rights reserved.
+# See the LICENSE file in the root of this repository for details.
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0 AND ValidMind Commercial
+
+"""Test Module Utils"""
+
+import inspect
+
+
+def test_description(test_class, truncate=True):
+    description = inspect.getdoc(test_class).strip()
+
+    if truncate and len(description.split("\n")) > 5:
+        return description.strip().split("\n")[0] + "..."
+
+    return description

validmind/unit_metrics/__init__.py

@@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ import hashlib
 import json
 from importlib import import_module
 
-from ..tests.decorator import _build_result, _inspect_signature
-from ..utils import get_model_info, test_id_to_name
+from validmind.input_registry import input_registry
+from validmind.tests.decorator import _build_result, _inspect_signature
+from validmind.utils import get_model_info, test_id_to_name
 
 unit_metric_results_cache = {}
 
@@ -157,7 +158,10 @@ def run_metric(metric_id, inputs=None, params=None, show=True, value_only=False)
         show (bool): Whether to display the results
         value_only (bool): Whether to return only the value
     """
-    inputs = inputs or {}
+    inputs = {
+        k: input_registry.get(v) if isinstance(v, str) else v
+        for k, v in (inputs or {}).items()
+    }
     params = params or {}
 
     cache_key = get_metric_cache_key(metric_id, params, inputs)
@@ -168,7 +172,11 @@ def run_metric(metric_id, inputs=None, params=None, show=True, value_only=False)
 
         result = metric(
             **{k: v for k, v in inputs.items() if k in _inputs.keys()},
-            **{k: v for k, v in params.items() if k in _params.keys()},
+            **{
+                k: v
+                for k, v in params.items()
+                if k in _params.keys() or "kwargs" in _params.keys()
+            },
         )
         unit_metric_results_cache[cache_key] = (
             result,

validmind/unit_metrics/composite.py

@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ class CompositeMetric(Metric):
             params=self.params,
             output_template=self.output_template,
             show=False,
+            generate_description=self.generate_description,
         )
 
         return self.result
@@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ def run_metrics(
     params: dict = None,
     test_id: str = None,
     show: bool = True,
+    generate_description: bool = True,
 ) -> MetricResultWrapper:
     """Run a composite metric
 
@@ -209,6 +211,7 @@ def run_metrics(
                 test_id=test_id,
                 default_description=description,
                 summary=result_summary.serialize(),
+                should_generate=generate_description,
             ),
             {
                 "content_id": f"composite_metric_def:{test_id}:unit_metrics",

validmind/vm_models/test/metric.py

@@ -78,11 +78,14 @@ class Metric(Test):
         self.result = MetricResultWrapper(
             result_id=self.test_id,
             result_metadata=[
-                get_description_metadata(
-                    test_id=self.test_id,
-                    default_description=self.description(),
-                    summary=metric.serialize()["summary"],
-                    figures=figures,
+                (
+                    get_description_metadata(
+                        test_id=self.test_id,
+                        default_description=self.description(),
+                        summary=metric.serialize()["summary"],
+                        figures=figures,
+                        should_generate=self.generate_description,
+                    )
                 )
             ],
             metric=metric,

validmind/vm_models/test/result_wrapper.py

@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ class MetricResultWrapper(ResultWrapper):
         """Check if the metric summary has columns from input datasets"""
         dataset_columns = set()
 
-        for input_id in self.inputs:
+        for input in self.inputs:
+            input_id = input if isinstance(input, str) else input.input_id
             input_obj = input_registry.get(input_id)
             if isinstance(input_obj, VMDataset):
                 dataset_columns.update(input_obj.columns)