trueppm-api 0.4.0b2__py3-none-any.whl

trueppm_api/apps/projects/template_views.py

@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+"""Project template gallery, publish, apply and undo (ADR-0789, #2729).
+
+RBAC follows ADR-0773's matrix, which already decided this before any code:
+**"Apply a template" is Admin+** (Owner and Admin; Viewer, Member and Scheduler
+cannot). Publishing is likewise Admin+ on the source project. *Reading* the gallery
+needs only authentication — a Member should be able to see what skeletons exist
+without being able to fire one at a project.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import Any, cast
+
+from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError as DjangoValidationError
+from django.db.models import Case, Count, IntegerField, Q, QuerySet, Value, When
+from drf_spectacular.utils import (
+    OpenApiResponse,
+    extend_schema,
+    extend_schema_field,
+    inline_serializer,
+)
+from rest_framework import serializers, status, viewsets
+from rest_framework.decorators import action
+from rest_framework.exceptions import PermissionDenied, ValidationError
+from rest_framework.permissions import IsAuthenticated
+from rest_framework.request import Request
+from rest_framework.response import Response
+
+from trueppm_api.apps.access.models import Role
+from trueppm_api.apps.access.permissions import (
+    IsProjectNotArchived,
+    _membership_role,
+    assert_project_not_archived,
+    role_can_undo_batch_operation,
+)
+from trueppm_api.apps.idempotency.mixins import IdempotencyMixin
+from trueppm_api.apps.projects.models import (
+    Methodology,
+    Project,
+    ProjectTemplate,
+    TemplateApplication,
+    TemplateApplicationStatus,
+    TemplateSource,
+)
+from trueppm_api.apps.projects.program_views import SeedImportThrottle
+from trueppm_api.apps.projects.project_templates import (
+    TemplateStructureError,
+    extract_structure,
+    summarize_structure,
+    validate_structure,
+)
+from trueppm_api.apps.projects.template_services import (
+    enqueue_template_apply,
+    undo_template_application,
+)
+from trueppm_api.apps.workspace.models import AuditEventType
+from trueppm_api.apps.workspace.services import record_audit_event
+from trueppm_api.core.openapi import state_refusal_400, undo_summary_schema
+from trueppm_api.core.request_body import object_body
+
+# Shared user-facing response details.
+_NO_SUCH_PROJECT_DETAIL = "No such project."
+
+#: `apply` and `undo` both refuse for two unrelated reasons that share a status
+#: code. Spelling them out is the difference between a client retrying usefully
+#: and a client retrying forever (#3354).
+_ARCHIVED_403 = (
+    "Two causes, and a client must tell them apart: the caller is below Project "
+    "Manager (Admin) on the project, **or** the project is archived. The archived "
+    "case clears for no role — including Owner — so escalating the caller will "
+    "never succeed; the project has to be unarchived (#3354)."
+)
+
+
+def _publish_inputs(data: Any) -> tuple[Any, str, Any]:
+    """Read and type-check ``publish``'s three body fields, before any project read.
+
+    Split out of ``publish`` only to keep it readable; the order matters and is
+    preserved — every check here runs *before* the project lookup and therefore
+    before ``_require_project_admin``, so an unauthorized caller still cannot use a
+    malformed body to learn whether a project exists.
+
+    Same type-confusion class as #2785: a JSON list/dict/number is truthy, so
+    ``(value or "")`` hands it straight to .strip() / slicing and raises
+    AttributeError, and a non-string pk reaches UUIDField.to_python, which raises
+    Django's ValidationError — not one of the ValueError/TypeError caught by the
+    caller, and not something DRF converts. All three are 500s on input that has to
+    be a 400.
+
+    Returns:
+        The raw project pk, the stripped name, and the raw description.
+    """
+    project_id = data.get("project")
+    raw_name = data.get("name")
+    raw_description = data.get("description")
+    for field, value in (
+        ("project", project_id),
+        ("name", raw_name),
+        ("description", raw_description),
+    ):
+        if value is not None and not isinstance(value, str):
+            raise ValidationError({field: "Must be a string."})
+
+    name = (raw_name or "").strip()
+    if not project_id or not name:
+        raise ValidationError({"detail": "Both `project` and `name` are required."})
+    return project_id, name, raw_description
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Request declarations for the two hand-parsed bodies (#3319)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+# Both handlers read their body themselves — ``object_body(request)`` plus
+# ``_publish_inputs`` — rather than through a serializer, and both were previously
+# declared ``request=None``. That is worse than a missing error branch: the
+# published contract said the endpoint accepts nothing, so a generated client had
+# no way to send the field the endpoint *requires*, and ``apply`` answered
+# ``{"project": "This field is required."}`` naming a field the schema had never
+# mentioned.
+#
+# These serializers are **declaration-only** — nothing calls ``is_valid()`` on
+# them, and the handlers' own checks stay the source of truth for what is
+# accepted. They exist so the schema states the shape those checks enforce. Keep
+# them in step with ``_publish_inputs`` / ``apply``: a field added to one and not
+# the other puts the contract back out of sync, which is the defect this fixes.
+# Declaring a body also brings both operations under #3286's automatic 400
+# injection, so the refusal each already emits is now typed for a client.
+_PublishRequestSerializer = inline_serializer(
+    name="ProjectTemplatePublish",
+    fields={
+        "project": serializers.UUIDField(
+            help_text="Project whose shape is frozen into the template. Required."
+        ),
+        "name": serializers.CharField(
+            help_text=(
+                "Template name. Required, whitespace-stripped, and truncated to 200 "
+                "characters rather than rejected when longer."
+            )
+        ),
+        "description": serializers.CharField(
+            required=False,
+            allow_blank=True,
+            allow_null=True,
+            help_text="Truncated to 2000 characters rather than rejected when longer.",
+        ),
+        "source_kind": serializers.ChoiceField(
+            choices=TemplateSource.choices,
+            required=False,
+            help_text="Provenance chip. Defaults to `workspace`.",
+        ),
+        "new_version": serializers.BooleanField(
+            required=False,
+            help_text=(
+                "Publish as the next version of an existing same-named template "
+                "instead of receiving a 409. Read permissively: the strings "
+                '`"true"` and `"1"` are also accepted, anything else is false.'
+            ),
+        ),
+    },
+)
+
+_ApplyRequestSerializer = inline_serializer(
+    name="ProjectTemplateApply",
+    fields={
+        "project": serializers.UUIDField(help_text="Project to seed from this template. Required."),
+    },
+)
+
+
+def _flag(value: Any) -> bool:
+    """Read a permissive boolean off attacker-shaped ``request.data``.
+
+    Non-string input is the #2795 container-type class: a JSON list or dict is
+    truthy and reaches ``.lower()`` as an AttributeError 500. Coerced through
+    ``str`` so every shape lands on False rather than on a stack trace.
+    """
+    return str(value).lower() in {"true", "1"}
+
+
+class ProjectTemplateSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer[ProjectTemplate]):
+    """Gallery row. ``structure`` is deliberately **not** exposed.
+
+    The gallery renders a name, a description, a provenance chip, a methodology,
+    and what the template carries — never the document itself. Publishing the
+    structure on a list endpoint would put a whole project's shape (task names
+    included) in front of anyone who can read the gallery, which is a wider
+    audience than the source project's members.
+    """
+
+    task_count = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    provenance = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    methodology = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    counts = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    usage_count = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    published_by_name = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    source_project_name = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+    is_superseded = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+
+    class Meta:
+        model = ProjectTemplate
+        fields = [  # noqa: RUF012
+            "id",
+            "name",
+            "description",
+            "source_kind",
+            "provenance",
+            "carries",
+            "methodology",
+            "task_count",
+            "version",
+            "program",
+            "is_published",
+            "published_at",
+            "published_by",
+            "published_by_name",
+            "source_project",
+            "source_project_name",
+            "supersedes",
+            "is_superseded",
+            "counts",
+            "usage_count",
+        ]
+        read_only_fields = [  # noqa: RUF012
+            "id",
+            "source_kind",
+            "provenance",
+            "carries",
+            "methodology",
+            "task_count",
+            "version",
+            "published_at",
+            "published_by",
+            "published_by_name",
+            "source_project",
+            "source_project_name",
+            "supersedes",
+            "is_superseded",
+            "counts",
+            "usage_count",
+        ]
+
+    def get_counts(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """Tasks, phases, gates and dependencies, off the frozen document (#2909).
+
+        Server-side because the publish inventory and the gallery's carries
+        summary are both screens whose credibility rests on a number, and a
+        client-side walk of a filtered tree would produce a different one.
+        """
+        return summarize_structure(obj.structure or {})
+
+    def get_usage_count(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> int:
+        """Projects created from this template — the PMO's only house-standard signal.
+
+        Annotated on the queryset where one is available; falls back to a count so
+        a serializer used outside the gallery (the publish response) still answers.
+        Undone applications are excluded: a template whose seeding was reversed
+        was not adopted, and counting it would overstate the standard.
+        """
+        annotated = getattr(obj, "adoption_count", None)
+        if annotated is not None:
+            return int(annotated)
+        return obj.applications.filter(
+            status=TemplateApplicationStatus.SUCCESS, undone_at__isnull=True
+        ).count()
+
+    def get_published_by_name(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> str:
+        user = obj.published_by or obj.owner
+        if user is None:
+            return ""
+        return str(getattr(user, "display_name", "") or getattr(user, "username", ""))
+
+    def get_source_project_name(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> str:
+        """Name of the project this was frozen from, or '' once it is gone.
+
+        Empty rather than absent when the FK has been nulled by a project
+        deletion: the provenance line simply drops, and the template still works.
+        """
+        return obj.source_project.name if obj.source_project else ""
+
+    def get_is_superseded(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> bool:
+        """A later version replaced this one. It stays selectable on purpose —
+        projects already created from it are why it must remain legible."""
+        return obj.superseded_by.exists()
+
+    def get_task_count(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> int:
+        """How many rows adopting this would write — the one number that decides adoption.
+
+        Read off the stored document rather than counted in SQL: the structure is
+        frozen at publish, so there is nothing to join against and no count that
+        could disagree with what apply will actually write.
+        """
+        structure = obj.structure or {}
+        tasks = structure.get("tasks")
+        return len(tasks) if isinstance(tasks, list) else 0
+
+    def get_methodology(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> str:
+        """The methodology the source project carried at publish time (ADR-0791).
+
+        Read off the frozen ``structure`` document, mirroring ``get_task_count`` —
+        never re-queries the (possibly since-edited/archived/deleted) source
+        project, and can never disagree with what ``apply`` will actually seed.
+        Falls back to ``Methodology.HYBRID`` (never null) for a structure written
+        before this key existed, or one edited outside the publish path — Hybrid is
+        the lossless default everywhere else in the methodology chain
+        (``methodology.DEFAULT_METHODOLOGY``), so an unresolved template under-hides
+        rather than over-hides tabs.
+        """
+        structure = obj.structure or {}
+        methodology = structure.get("methodology")
+        return methodology if methodology in Methodology.values else Methodology.HYBRID
+
+    def get_provenance(self, obj: ProjectTemplate) -> str:
+        """The chip label — "Workspace" / "Community" / "Yours".
+
+        ``source_kind`` is stored, so two readers agree on Workspace and Community.
+        *Yours* is the one label additionally narrowed at read time, because it is
+        the only one that is genuinely relative to who is asking (ADR-0789 §2).
+        """
+        request = self.context.get("request")
+        user = getattr(request, "user", None)
+        if obj.source_kind == TemplateSource.PERSONAL:
+            if user is not None and obj.owner_id == getattr(user, "id", None):
+                return "Yours"
+            # Somebody else's personal template that has been shared into view:
+            # it is not "Yours", and calling it Workspace would overstate its
+            # standing. Name the publisher's tier honestly.
+            return "Community"
+        return TemplateSource(obj.source_kind).label
+
+
+class TemplateApplicationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer[TemplateApplication]):
+    """The adoption record — also what the Start sheet polls while seeding runs."""
+
+    class Meta:
+        model = TemplateApplication
+        fields = [  # noqa: RUF012
+            "id",
+            "template",
+            "template_name",
+            "template_version",
+            "project",
+            "applied_by",
+            "status",
+            "result_summary",
+            "error_detail",
+            "created_at",
+            "completed_at",
+            "undone_at",
+        ]
+        read_only_fields = fields
+
+
+class TemplateApplicationUndoSerializer(TemplateApplicationSerializer):
+    """The adoption record **plus** the ``undo`` summary the action returns (#3416).
+
+    The handler builds its body as ``data = self.get_serializer(application).data``
+    then ``data["undo"] = summary``, so the bare ``TemplateApplicationSerializer``
+    published as the ``200`` gave a typed client no field for the deleted/kept split
+    — and that split is the whole point of the call here, because undo deliberately
+    *keeps* rows a person has since edited (ADR-0786 §4). A client that cannot read
+    ``kept`` cannot tell a full reversal from a partial one.
+    """
+
+    undo = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
+
+    class Meta(TemplateApplicationSerializer.Meta):
+        fields = [*TemplateApplicationSerializer.Meta.fields, "undo"]  # noqa: RUF012
+
+    @extend_schema_field(
+        undo_summary_schema(
+            "What the undo did to the rows this application wrote.",
+            deleted="Rows removed — written by the application and untouched since.",
+            kept=(
+                "Rows left in place because someone has edited them since. A non-zero "
+                "value means the project still carries part of the template."
+            ),
+        )
+    )
+    def get_undo(self, obj: TemplateApplication) -> dict[str, int]:
+        """The persisted summary, for a caller that serializes a row outside the action.
+
+        Not what the action returns: ``undo_template_application`` short-circuits an
+        application that created no rows and returns ``{"deleted": 0, "kept": 0}``
+        without persisting a summary, so the action's live value is authoritative and
+        this is the best a later reader can do.
+        """
+        return dict((obj.result_summary or {}).get("undo") or {})
+
+
+class ProjectTemplateViewSet(IdempotencyMixin, viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet[ProjectTemplate]):
+    """Templates available to the caller, plus publish and apply.
+
+    **ReadOnly** on purpose, not for lack of ambition. A ``ModelViewSet`` here would
+    inherit create / update / destroy under this class's ``IsAuthenticated``, which
+    is the wrong gate for all three: any authenticated user could mint an empty
+    template, or rename and delete somebody else's. Publishing has exactly one door
+    (``publish``, Admin+ on the source project) and it is the door that runs the
+    extraction. Editing and unpublishing are deliberately not in this issue —
+    absent is safer than present-and-ungated.
+
+    Apply is throttled on the existing ``seed_import`` scope rather than a new one
+    (ADR-0789 §Context 3). Template apply is a third background seeding path
+    alongside seed import and CSV/MS Project import; #2615 remains the issue that
+    bounds per-user concurrency for all three. Reusing the scope inherits exactly
+    the bound the other paths have today and keeps that fix in one place, instead
+    of adding a fourth unbounded path.
+    """
+
+    serializer_class = ProjectTemplateSerializer
+    permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]  # noqa: RUF012
+
+    def get_queryset(self) -> QuerySet[ProjectTemplate]:
+        """Published templates in scope: workspace-wide, or this program's.
+
+        ``?program=`` narrows to a program's own templates *plus* the workspace-wide
+        ones — a program-scoped gallery that hid the shared skeletons would be
+        emptier than the user expects and would push them to republish duplicates.
+        """
+        qs = (
+            ProjectTemplate.objects.filter(is_published=True)
+            .select_related("owner", "published_by", "source_project")
+            # One aggregate rather than a per-row count in the serializer: the
+            # gallery renders every template at once, so a SerializerMethodField
+            # doing its own query is N+1 by construction (#2909).
+            .annotate(
+                adoption_count=Count(
+                    "applications",
+                    filter=Q(
+                        applications__status=TemplateApplicationStatus.SUCCESS,
+                        applications__undone_at__isnull=True,
+                    ),
+                    distinct=True,
+                )
+            )
+            # Provenance is the sort key as well as the chip (#2909): on a
+            # workspace that has published its own shapes, those are the ones
+            # worth reading first, and the bundled starters sort last. The chip
+            # stays on every row regardless of position — order is a nudge, not
+            # the information. Explicit rather than leaning on Meta.ordering,
+            # which an annotate() drops and which paginates unordered.
+            .order_by(
+                Case(
+                    When(source_kind=TemplateSource.COMMUNITY, then=Value(1)),
+                    default=Value(0),
+                    output_field=IntegerField(),
+                ),
+                "name",
+                "-version",
+            )
+        )
+        program_id = self.request.query_params.get("program")
+        if program_id:
+            qs = qs.filter(Q(program_id=program_id) | Q(program__isnull=True))
+        return qs
+
+    def _require_project_admin(self, project: Project) -> None:
+        """ADR-0773: publishing and applying are Admin+ on the project in question."""
+        role = _membership_role(self.request, project.pk)
+        if role is None or role < Role.ADMIN:
+            raise PermissionDenied(
+                "You need at least Project Manager role to publish or apply a template."
+            )
+
+    @extend_schema(
+        request=_PublishRequestSerializer,
+        responses={
+            201: ProjectTemplateSerializer,
+            409: OpenApiResponse(
+                description=(
+                    "A template with this name already exists in the pool the caller "
+                    "can see. Carries ``code: name_taken`` plus ``template``, "
+                    "``version`` and ``next_version`` — resend with "
+                    "``new_version: true`` to publish the next version of it."
+                )
+            ),
+        },
+        description="Publish a project's shape as a reusable template.",
+    )
+    @action(detail=False, methods=["post"], url_path="publish")
+    def publish(self, request: Request) -> Response:
+        """Freeze a project's shape into a new template (or a new version of one).
+
+        Extraction happens **here**, synchronously: it is a read of one project's
+        tasks and edges, bounded by ``MAX_TEMPLATE_NODES``, and the publisher should
+        learn immediately whether their project was too large rather than by polling.
+        """
+        body = object_body(request)
+        project_id, name, raw_description = _publish_inputs(body)
+        try:
+            project = Project.objects.get(pk=project_id, is_deleted=False)
+        except (Project.DoesNotExist, ValueError, TypeError) as exc:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": _NO_SUCH_PROJECT_DETAIL}) from exc
+        self._require_project_admin(project)
+
+        try:
+            structure = extract_structure(project)
+        except TemplateStructureError as exc:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": str(exc)}) from exc
+
+        source_kind = body.get("source_kind") or TemplateSource.WORKSPACE
+        if source_kind not in TemplateSource.values:
+            raise ValidationError({"source_kind": "Unknown provenance."})
+
+        # Republishing writes a NEW row and leaves the old one selectable, rather
+        # than editing in place (#2909). The projects already created from v1 are
+        # the only audit trail a PMO has for why they look the way they do, and a
+        # version mutated under them turns that trail into a lie. So a name that
+        # is already taken is a decision, not an error to swallow: either publish
+        # a new version of that template, or pick a different name.
+        #
+        # The lookup is scoped to the pool the publisher can actually SEE (#3309),
+        # matching ``get_queryset``'s own narrowing (this program's templates plus
+        # the workspace-wide ones). A name-only lookup reached across programs and
+        # broke twice: Program B's republish superseded Program A's v1, so A's card
+        # rendered the ``superseded`` chip because of a row A cannot see and cannot
+        # find; and without ``new_version`` the 409 named — and gave the version of
+        # — a template B has no access to. A supersede must only ever occur inside
+        # a pool both parties can read.
+        #
+        # Own-program rows outrank workspace-wide ones on a tie, so a program that
+        # already owns this name extends ITS chain rather than forking whichever
+        # row happens to carry the higher version number.
+        scope = Q(program=project.program) | Q(program__isnull=True)
+        existing = (
+            ProjectTemplate.objects.filter(scope, name=name[:200])
+            .annotate(
+                _shared_pool=Case(
+                    When(program__isnull=True, then=Value(1)),
+                    default=Value(0),
+                    output_field=IntegerField(),
+                )
+            )
+            .order_by("_shared_pool", "-version")
+            .first()
+        )
+        supersede = _flag(body.get("new_version"))
+        if existing is not None and not supersede:
+            return Response(
+                {
+                    "code": "name_taken",
+                    "detail": (
+                        f"“{existing.name}” already exists in this workspace "
+                        f"(v{existing.version}). Publish a new version of it, or "
+                        f"give this one a different name."
+                    ),
+                    "template": str(existing.pk),
+                    "version": existing.version,
+                    "next_version": existing.version + 1,
+                },
+                status=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT,
+            )
+
+        template = ProjectTemplate.objects.create(
+            name=name[:200],
+            description=(raw_description or "")[:2000],
+            source_kind=source_kind,
+            owner=cast("Any", request.user),
+            published_by=cast("Any", request.user),
+            program=project.program,
+            source_project=project,
+            supersedes=existing,
+            version=(existing.version + 1) if existing is not None else 1,
+            structure=structure,
+            carries=structure.get("carries", []),
+        )
+        # A workspace-visible disclosure act: this puts one project's task names in
+        # front of everyone in the workspace, and a new version changes what the
+        # house shape resolves to for every future adopter. Written through the
+        # ADR-0157 choke point, inside this request's transaction, so the log can
+        # never claim a publish that rolled back.
+        record_audit_event(
+            event_type=AuditEventType.TEMPLATE_PUBLISHED,
+            actor=request.user,
+            target_type="project_template",
+            target_id=template.pk,
+            target_label=f"{template.name} v{template.version}",
+            metadata={
+                "version": template.version,
+                "source_project": str(project.pk),
+                "supersedes": str(existing.pk) if existing is not None else None,
+                "task_count": len(structure.get("tasks", [])),
+                "source_kind": source_kind,
+            },
+        )
+        return Response(
+            self.get_serializer(template).data,
+            status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED,
+        )
+
+    @extend_schema(
+        responses={
+            200: OpenApiResponse(
+                description=(
+                    "Dry run: what publishing this project would carry — "
+                    "{task_count, phase_count, gate_count, milestone_count, "
+                    "dependency_count, methodology, carries, name_taken, "
+                    "next_version}. Writes nothing."
+                )
+            ),
+            403: OpenApiResponse(description="Caller is not Admin+ on the project."),
+        },
+        description=(
+            "Counts for the publish form, computed from the same extraction publish itself runs."
+        ),
+    )
+    @action(detail=False, methods=["get"], url_path="publish-preview")
+    def publish_preview(self, request: Request) -> Response:
+        """The six counts the Settings page and the confirm step both show (#2909).
+
+        Runs the **same** ``extract_structure`` the publish action runs, so the
+        numbers on the confirm screen are the numbers that will be written — not
+        a client-side walk of whatever the Grid currently has loaded, which a
+        collapsed or filtered view would get wrong.
+
+        Also reports whether the proposed name is taken, so the form can offer
+        "publish as v3 instead" before the operator fills anything in rather than
+        after a 409.
+        """
+        project_id = request.query_params.get("project")
+        if not project_id:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": "Required."})
+        try:
+            project = Project.objects.get(pk=project_id, is_deleted=False)
+        except (Project.DoesNotExist, ValueError, TypeError, DjangoValidationError) as exc:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": _NO_SUCH_PROJECT_DETAIL}) from exc
+        self._require_project_admin(project)
+
+        try:
+            structure = extract_structure(project)
+        except TemplateStructureError as exc:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": str(exc)}) from exc
+
+        summary = summarize_structure(structure)
+        proposed = (request.query_params.get("name") or "").strip()
+        existing = (
+            ProjectTemplate.objects.filter(name=proposed[:200]).order_by("-version").first()
+            if proposed
+            else None
+        )
+        summary["name_taken"] = existing is not None
+        summary["next_version"] = (existing.version + 1) if existing is not None else 1
+        summary["existing_template"] = str(existing.pk) if existing is not None else None
+        return Response(summary, status=status.HTTP_200_OK)
+
+    @extend_schema(
+        request=_ApplyRequestSerializer,
+        responses={
+            202: OpenApiResponse(description='{"queued": true, "application": "<uuid>"}'),
+            403: OpenApiResponse(description=_ARCHIVED_403),
+        },
+        description="Apply this template to a project. Returns 202; seeding runs async.",
+    )
+    @action(
+        detail=True,
+        methods=["post"],
+        url_path="apply",
+        throttle_classes=[SeedImportThrottle],
+    )
+    def apply(self, request: Request, pk: str | None = None) -> Response:
+        """Queue a seeding job and hand back the application id.
+
+        Returns ``202 {"queued": true}`` and **not** a Celery task id: dispatch is
+        best-effort behind an outbox, so there may be no task id yet (or ever, for
+        the delivery that gets dropped and re-dispatched by the drain). The
+        application id is the durable handle — it exists the moment the request
+        commits, and it is what the Start sheet polls.
+        """
+        template = self.get_object()
+        project_id = object_body(request).get("project")
+        if not project_id:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": "This field is required."})
+        try:
+            project = Project.objects.get(pk=cast("Any", project_id), is_deleted=False)
+        # `DjangoValidationError` is what `UUIDField.to_python` raises on a malformed
+        # pk, and DRF does not convert it — without it in this tuple a non-UUID
+        # `project` is a 500, reachable by any authenticated user because this line
+        # runs before `_require_project_admin`. `publish_preview` above already caught
+        # it; this call site had drifted (the #2785 class).
+        except (Project.DoesNotExist, ValueError, TypeError, DjangoValidationError) as exc:
+            raise ValidationError({"project": _NO_SUCH_PROJECT_DETAIL}) from exc
+        self._require_project_admin(project)
+        # The forward half of the same gap (#3354). `IsProjectNotArchived` cannot run
+        # on this action: it resolves its target project from the request *body*, so
+        # `has_permission` finds no `project_pk` kwarg and passes, and `get_object()`
+        # returns the `ProjectTemplate` — which carries no `project_id` — so
+        # `has_object_permission` reads None and passes too. Seeding a whole
+        # template's worth of rows into an archived plan is the largest write in this
+        # family and has to be refused explicitly. `enqueue_template_apply` repeats
+        # the check for non-view callers (ADR-0184 defense-in-depth).
+        #
+        # Deliberately NOT applied to `publish`/`publish_preview` above: those read
+        # the source project and write a workspace-level `ProjectTemplate` row. The
+        # archived flag makes a plan read-only, and extracting a template from one is
+        # a read of it.
+        assert_project_not_archived(project)
+
+        # Re-validate here, not only at publish: `structure` is a JSONB column, so
+        # the row can be edited by any path that reaches the database, and this is
+        # the request that turns it into rows in somebody's project.
+        try:
+            validate_structure(template.structure)
+        except TemplateStructureError as exc:
+            raise ValidationError({"template": str(exc)}) from exc
+
+        application = enqueue_template_apply(
+            template, project, applied_by=cast("Any", request.user)
+        )
+        return Response(
+            {"queued": True, "application": str(application.id)},
+            status=status.HTTP_202_ACCEPTED,
+        )
+
+
+class TemplateApplicationViewSet(
+    IdempotencyMixin, viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet[TemplateApplication]
+):
+    """Poll an application's progress, and undo it.
+
+    Read is scoped to projects the caller is a member of — an application row names
+    a project and a person, so an unscoped list would leak both.
+    """
+
+    serializer_class = TemplateApplicationSerializer
+    # `undo` soft-deletes the task rows this application wrote, so this route is a
+    # write path and takes the archived floor — the same gap #3354 found on the two
+    # `batch_operation_views` ledgers, which were written to mirror this viewset's
+    # shape and inherited its omission along with it. Reads pass untouched
+    # (SAFE_METHODS), so the Start sheet can still poll an archived project's
+    # application row. The project resolves from the object's `project_id` in
+    # `has_object_permission`, not a URL kwarg — see `PasteManyOperationViewSet`.
+    permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated, IsProjectNotArchived]  # noqa: RUF012
+
+    def get_queryset(self) -> QuerySet[TemplateApplication]:
+        from trueppm_api.apps.access.models import ProjectMembership
+
+        member_project_ids = ProjectMembership.objects.filter(
+            user=cast("Any", self.request.user), is_deleted=False
+        ).values_list("project_id", flat=True)
+        qs = TemplateApplication.objects.filter(project_id__in=member_project_ids)
+        project_id = self.request.query_params.get("project")
+        if project_id:
+            qs = qs.filter(project_id=project_id)
+        return qs
+
+    @extend_schema(
+        request=None,
+        responses={
+            200: TemplateApplicationUndoSerializer,
+            400: state_refusal_400(
+                "The application is not in a state that can be undone — it never "
+                "reached SUCCESS, or it has already been undone. Verified against "
+                "the status guard in ``undo`` (#3319)."
+            ),
+            403: OpenApiResponse(description=_ARCHIVED_403),
+        },
+        description="Undo this application — removes the rows it wrote that nobody has edited.",
+    )
+    @action(detail=True, methods=["post"], url_path="undo")
+    def undo(self, request: Request, pk: str | None = None) -> Response:
+        """Reverse one application in a single step.
+
+        Rows a person has since touched are **kept**, not deleted — see
+        ``undo_template_application``. Undoing an application that never succeeded,
+        or has already been undone, is a 400 rather than a silent no-op: the caller
+        asked to reverse something and deserves to know it did not happen.
+        """
+        application = self.get_object()
+        # Defers to `role_can_undo_batch_operation` rather than testing the ordinal
+        # here: this is the same "may you reverse a recorded batch write" rule the
+        # paste-many, cascade and CSV-import undos enforce, and three apply endpoints
+        # now report it to the client as `can_undo`. An inline copy here is a second
+        # implementation of a rule that is itself under revision (#3355) — #3353.
+        #
+        # `_require_project_admin` above is deliberately NOT folded in: it gates
+        # PUBLISHING and APPLYING a template, a different rule that happens to share
+        # today's ordinal (ADR-0773). Merging them would make one edit move two floors.
+        #
+        # Be explicit about what this call DOES couple, so #3355 has to confront it:
+        # template apply/undo is the one SYMMETRIC member of the family (Admin+ both
+        # ways), so lowering the shared batch-undo floor would loosen undo here without
+        # touching apply — a Member could reverse an application they could not apply.
+        # Today's behavior is unchanged; the blast radius is not. Whoever resolves
+        # #3355 must decide whether this endpoint follows or gets its own predicate.
+        role = _membership_role(request, cast("Any", application.project_id))
+        if not role_can_undo_batch_operation(role):
+            raise PermissionDenied("You need at least Project Manager role to undo a template.")
+        if application.status != TemplateApplicationStatus.SUCCESS:
+            raise ValidationError(
+                {
+                    "detail": f"Only a completed application can be undone (this one is "
+                    f"{application.status})."
+                }
+            )
+        summary = undo_template_application(application)
+        application.refresh_from_db()
+        data: dict[str, Any] = self.get_serializer(application).data
+        data["undo"] = summary
+        return Response(data, status=status.HTTP_200_OK)