sourcecode 3.1.1__py3-none-any.whl → 3.2.0__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Potentially problematic release.


This version of sourcecode might be problematic. Click here for more details.

sourcecode/__init__.py CHANGED
@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ ASK Engine is the product. ``ask`` is the canonical CLI command; ``sourcecode``
4
4
  the legacy compatibility alias and the Python/PyPI package name. See
5
5
  docs/PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md (normative)."""
6
6
 
7
- __version__ = "3.1.1"
7
+ __version__ = "3.2.0"
sourcecode/cli.py CHANGED
@@ -4084,7 +4084,11 @@ def impact_cmd(
4084
4084
  - direct_callers — classes that directly call or depend on the target
4085
4085
  - indirect_callers — transitive callers (BFS, bounded by --depth)
4086
4086
  - endpoints_affected — HTTP endpoints that transitively depend on the target
4087
- - transactional_boundaries_touched — @Transactional classes in the call chain
4087
+ - transactional_boundaries_touched — @Transactional declarations on the target
4088
+ and on everything that calls it
4089
+ - transactional_boundaries_reaching — the callers-only subset: what would run
4090
+ this change inside a transaction (the figure
4091
+ `ask retrieve transactions-reaching` reports)
4088
4092
  - risk_score / risk_level — quantified change risk
4089
4093
 
4090
4094
  \b
@@ -4714,7 +4718,10 @@ def export_cmd(
4714
4718
  ),
4715
4719
  integrations: bool = typer.Option(
4716
4720
  False, "--integrations",
4717
- help="Detect outbound integrations (HTTP/LDAP/JMS clients) with file:line evidence.",
4721
+ help=(
4722
+ "Detect outbound integrations (HTTP/LDAP/JMS clients) with file:line "
4723
+ "evidence, plus the client libraries the build declares."
4724
+ ),
4718
4725
  ),
4719
4726
  c4: bool = typer.Option(
4720
4727
  False, "--c4",
@@ -4742,6 +4749,11 @@ def export_cmd(
4742
4749
  rolled up from class-level relation edges.
4743
4750
  --integrations Outbound integrations (RestTemplate/WebClient/Feign/LDAP/JMS)
4744
4751
  with file:line evidence — external-system dependency arrows.
4752
+ Also lists the client libraries the BUILD declares
4753
+ (declared_clients) and which of those no source construct
4754
+ uses — a config-wired client has no construct to find, so a
4755
+ count of 0 is never left standing alone against a client
4756
+ library named in the stack block.
4745
4757
  --c4 Unified architecture document mapped onto the open C4 model
4746
4758
  (context/containers/components/code) + an API surface and a
4747
4759
  per-directory content-hash manifest for incremental consumers.
@@ -4792,9 +4804,12 @@ def export_cmd(
4792
4804
  graph = ir.get("graph", {})
4793
4805
  _ep_data = extract_java_endpoints(root)
4794
4806
  endpoints = _ep_data.get("endpoints", [])
4807
+ from sourcecode.integration_coordinates import declared_integration_coordinates
4795
4808
  _integrations = SemanticIntegrationEngine(
4796
4809
  ContextGraph.build(file_list, root)
4797
- ).as_report(len(file_list))
4810
+ ).as_report(
4811
+ len(file_list), declared=declared_integration_coordinates(root),
4812
+ )
4798
4813
  data = _build_c4_export(
4799
4814
  root,
4800
4815
  file_list,
@@ -4831,9 +4846,12 @@ def export_cmd(
4831
4846
  if integrations:
4832
4847
  from sourcecode.context_graph import ContextGraph
4833
4848
  from sourcecode.semantic_integration_engine import SemanticIntegrationEngine
4849
+ from sourcecode.integration_coordinates import declared_integration_coordinates
4834
4850
  data["integrations"] = SemanticIntegrationEngine(
4835
4851
  ContextGraph.build(file_list, root)
4836
- ).as_report(len(file_list))
4852
+ ).as_report(
4853
+ len(file_list), declared=declared_integration_coordinates(root),
4854
+ )
4837
4855
 
4838
4856
  _prog.finish()
4839
4857
  output = _serialize_dict(data, format)
@@ -5684,19 +5702,35 @@ def _render_gate_coverage_section(result: "SpringAuditResult") -> list[str]: #
5684
5702
  gc = (result.security_posture or {}).get("gate_coverage")
5685
5703
  if not gc:
5686
5704
  return []
5687
- not_covered = gc.get("not_carrying_gate", 0)
5705
+ not_covered = gc.get("endpoints_not_carrying_gate", gc.get("not_carrying_gate", 0))
5688
5706
  gates = ", ".join(f"`{g}`" for g in gc.get("gate_annotations", [])) or "the detected gate"
5689
- total = gc.get("total_controller_handlers", 0)
5707
+ # One unit, named: these are endpoints, not handler methods. The two counts differ
5708
+ # (one method can serve several mappings) and must never be summed together.
5709
+ total = gc.get("endpoints_total", gc.get("total_controller_handlers", 0))
5690
5710
  lines: list[str] = ["", "---", ""]
5691
5711
  if not_covered == 0:
5692
- lines.append(f" **Gate coverage** — all {total} controller handlers carry {gates}.")
5712
+ _gated = gc.get("endpoints_carrying_gate", total)
5713
+ _std = gc.get("endpoints_standard_guarded", 0)
5714
+ if _std:
5715
+ lines.append(
5716
+ f"✅ **Gate coverage** — all {total} endpoints are guarded: {_gated} carry "
5717
+ f"{gates}, {_std} rely on a standard guard."
5718
+ )
5719
+ else:
5720
+ lines.append(f"✅ **Gate coverage** — all {total} endpoints carry {gates}.")
5693
5721
  return lines
5694
5722
 
5695
5723
  covered = gc.get("possibly_filter_covered", 0)
5724
+ _standard = gc.get("endpoints_standard_guarded", 0)
5696
5725
  lines.append(
5697
- f"🔓 **Gate coverage** — {not_covered} of {total} controller handlers do not carry "
5726
+ f"🔓 **Gate coverage** — {not_covered} of {total} endpoints do not carry "
5698
5727
  f"{gates}."
5699
5728
  )
5729
+ if _standard:
5730
+ lines.append(
5731
+ f"_{gc.get('endpoints_carrying_gate', 0)} carry the gate, {_standard} rely on a "
5732
+ f"standard guard, {not_covered} on neither — the three sum to {total}._"
5733
+ )
5700
5734
  if gc.get("reconstructed_filter_patterns"):
5701
5735
  lines.append(
5702
5736
  f"_{covered} of those match a reconstructed servlet filter pattern "
@@ -6369,6 +6403,16 @@ def migrate_check_cmd(
6369
6403
  ask migrate-check . --output migration.json
6370
6404
  ask migrate-check . --snapshot --ref sprint-12 persist a readiness point
6371
6405
  ask migrate-check . --trend days-remaining over time
6406
+ ask migrate-check . --blast-radius endpoints behind each blocker
6407
+
6408
+ \b
6409
+ Blast radius (--blast-radius):
6410
+ Ranks the affected product files by the HTTP endpoints whose call path runs
6411
+ through them — the re-test plan, ordered by regression scope. Reach is never
6412
+ build breakage: a javax→jakarta finding fails compilation whether or not an
6413
+ endpoint reaches it. A file whose types the IR could not resolve is reported
6414
+ unresolved (reach unknown, never zero), and a repository with no endpoints in
6415
+ the IR gets a null share with the reason stated instead of a 0.0.
6372
6416
 
6373
6417
  \b
6374
6418
  Readiness time series:
@@ -6587,7 +6631,8 @@ def impact_chain_cmd(
6587
6631
  - indirect_callers — transitive callers (BFS up to --depth hops)
6588
6632
  - endpoints_affected — HTTP endpoints reachable through the call chain
6589
6633
  - transaction_boundary — @Transactional semantics on the target (if any)
6590
- - security_surfaces — per-endpoint security policy + SEC findings
6634
+ - security_surfaces — per-endpoint security verdict + confidence
6635
+ (security_posture authority) + declared policy + SEC findings
6591
6636
  - impact_findings — TX/SEC audit findings touching the call chain
6592
6637
  - risk_level — critical | high | medium | low
6593
6638
 
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ from sourcecode.detectors.parsers import (
15
15
  substitute_maven_properties as _resolve_maven_property,
16
16
  unique_strings,
17
17
  )
18
+ from sourcecode.integration_coordinates import coordinates_for_kind
18
19
  from sourcecode.schema import FrameworkDetection
19
20
  from sourcecode.tree_utils import flatten_file_tree
20
21
 
@@ -488,11 +489,15 @@ class JavaDetector(AbstractDetector):
488
489
  if "spring-boot-starter-data-jpa" in text or "spring-data-jpa" in text:
489
490
  frameworks.append(FrameworkDetection(name="Spring Data JPA", source=source))
490
491
  # The Boot starter names neither of the module coordinates, so a Boot app
491
- # wiring LDAP the standard way declared no LDAP framework at all.
492
- if (
493
- "spring-ldap-core" in text
494
- or "spring-security-ldap" in text
495
- or "spring-boot-starter-data-ldap" in text
492
+ # wiring LDAP the standard way declared no LDAP framework at all. The coordinate
493
+ # list lives in `integration_coordinates` — the same set `export --integrations`
494
+ # reads, so this stack block and that report can never recognize different
495
+ # libraries for the same external system (ADR-0008 R12).
496
+ # Only the Spring-family coordinates may carry the "Spring LDAP" label — the
497
+ # authority also knows non-Spring directory clients, and naming the wrong library
498
+ # would trade one incoherence for another.
499
+ if any(
500
+ c in text for c in coordinates_for_kind("ldap") if c.startswith("spring-")
496
501
  ):
497
502
  frameworks.append(FrameworkDetection(name="Spring LDAP", source=source))
498
503
  if "spring-aspects" in text or "spring-aop" in text:
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
1
+ """integration_coordinates.py — the declared-client signal for outbound integrations.
2
+
3
+ THE authority for one question: *which outbound-integration client libraries does this
4
+ repository's build declare?* (ADR-0008 R1). It is a different question from "which client
5
+ constructs does the source contain" — that one belongs to
6
+ :mod:`sourcecode.semantic_integration_engine` — and the two answers only conflict when a
7
+ document reports one and stays silent about the other.
8
+
9
+ That is exactly what the field reported, twice, two majors apart: `export --integrations`
10
+ answered `count: 0` on a repository whose stack block listed **Spring LDAP**. Reproduced on
11
+ a Boot app that declares `spring-boot-starter-data-ldap` and configures
12
+ `spring.ldap.urls` in YAML: the directory is wired entirely by properties, so no LDAP
13
+ client type is ever imported and the construct scan is *right* to find nothing — but the
14
+ document as a whole then said the system has no outbound integrations while its own stack
15
+ block said it talks to a directory.
16
+
17
+ A declared coordinate is **evidence of a declared client, never an observed integration**
18
+ (the same discipline that stopped a `org.mybatis` coordinate from being reported as MyBatis
19
+ usage in `detectors/java.py`). This module answers what the build declares; the engine
20
+ answers what the code does; the payload states both and says which is which.
21
+
22
+ VAI (see `security_posture` §0.5): the table below lists **published open-source artifact
23
+ coordinates** — the identity of a library, matched literally, the same basis as the engine's
24
+ published client-type table. No proprietary, client or convention name appears here, and no
25
+ predicate branches on a repository's own naming.
26
+ """
27
+ from __future__ import annotations
28
+
29
+ import re
30
+ from dataclasses import dataclass
31
+ from pathlib import Path
32
+ from typing import Iterable, Optional
33
+
34
+ # Build-manifest artifact coordinate → the outbound-integration kind it declares.
35
+ # Kinds are exactly the engine's kinds, so declared and observed answers are comparable.
36
+ # Only coordinates whose sole purpose is to talk to an external system are listed: a
37
+ # driver-or-anything coordinate that a repository might carry for unrelated reasons has no
38
+ # place here, because a declaration nobody can act on is noise, not evidence.
39
+ _COORDINATE_KIND: "dict[str, str]" = {
40
+ # Directory (LDAP)
41
+ "spring-ldap-core": "ldap",
42
+ "spring-security-ldap": "ldap",
43
+ "spring-boot-starter-data-ldap": "ldap",
44
+ "spring-boot-starter-ldap": "ldap",
45
+ "unboundid-ldapsdk": "ldap",
46
+ # Kafka
47
+ "spring-kafka": "kafka",
48
+ "kafka-clients": "kafka",
49
+ "spring-cloud-stream-binder-kafka": "kafka",
50
+ # RabbitMQ / AMQP
51
+ "spring-boot-starter-amqp": "rabbitmq",
52
+ "spring-rabbit": "rabbitmq",
53
+ "amqp-client": "rabbitmq",
54
+ # JMS brokers
55
+ "spring-boot-starter-activemq": "jms",
56
+ "spring-boot-starter-artemis": "jms",
57
+ "activemq-client": "jms",
58
+ "activemq-broker": "jms",
59
+ "artemis-jms-client": "jms",
60
+ "spring-jms": "jms",
61
+ # Redis
62
+ "spring-boot-starter-data-redis": "redis",
63
+ "spring-data-redis": "redis",
64
+ "lettuce-core": "redis",
65
+ "jedis": "redis",
66
+ # Elasticsearch
67
+ "spring-boot-starter-data-elasticsearch": "elasticsearch",
68
+ "elasticsearch-rest-high-level-client": "elasticsearch",
69
+ "elasticsearch-java": "elasticsearch",
70
+ # Mail (SMTP)
71
+ "spring-boot-starter-mail": "smtp",
72
+ # Declarative HTTP clients
73
+ "spring-cloud-starter-openfeign": "http",
74
+ "feign-core": "http",
75
+ "okhttp": "http",
76
+ # SOAP
77
+ "spring-ws-core": "soap",
78
+ "spring-boot-starter-web-services": "soap",
79
+ "cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws": "soap",
80
+ }
81
+
82
+ # Build manifests scanned. Text-level, like the framework-coordinate scan in
83
+ # `detectors/java.py` — a build file is configuration, not source.
84
+ _MANIFEST_NAMES: frozenset[str] = frozenset({
85
+ "pom.xml", "build.gradle", "build.gradle.kts",
86
+ })
87
+
88
+ # Directories that never hold a production build manifest.
89
+ _SKIP_DIRS: frozenset[str] = frozenset({
90
+ ".git", ".idea", "target", "build", "node_modules", ".sourcecode-cache",
91
+ ".gradle", "out", "dist",
92
+ })
93
+
94
+ # A repository with thousands of modules is real (OFBiz, Broadleaf); an unbounded walk is
95
+ # not. The cap is stated in the payload when it bites, never applied silently.
96
+ _MAX_MANIFESTS = 400
97
+
98
+ _TEST_SCOPE_WINDOW = 4 # lines after a Maven coordinate that may carry its <scope>
99
+ _TEST_SCOPE = re.compile(r"<scope>\s*(test|provided)\s*</scope>", re.IGNORECASE)
100
+ _GRADLE_TEST_CONF = re.compile(r"^\s*(test|androidTest)[A-Za-z]*\s*[(\s'\"]", re.IGNORECASE)
101
+
102
+
103
+ @dataclass(frozen=True)
104
+ class DeclaredClient:
105
+ """A client library the build declares, with the line that declares it."""
106
+
107
+ kind: str
108
+ coordinate: str
109
+ evidence: str # "relpath:line" — same shape as an Integration's evidence
110
+
111
+ def to_dict(self) -> dict:
112
+ return {"kind": self.kind, "coordinate": self.coordinate, "evidence": self.evidence}
113
+
114
+
115
+ def coordinates_for_kind(kind: str) -> tuple[str, ...]:
116
+ """Published coordinates that declare ``kind``. One home for the list, so a consumer
117
+ that recognizes a library recognizes the same set this authority does."""
118
+ return tuple(sorted(c for c, k in _COORDINATE_KIND.items() if k == kind))
119
+
120
+
121
+ def _manifest_paths(root: Path) -> list[Path]:
122
+ found: list[Path] = []
123
+ for name in sorted(_MANIFEST_NAMES):
124
+ for path in sorted(root.rglob(name)):
125
+ if len(found) >= _MAX_MANIFESTS:
126
+ return found
127
+ if any(part in _SKIP_DIRS for part in path.parts):
128
+ continue
129
+ if path.is_file():
130
+ found.append(path)
131
+ return found
132
+
133
+
134
+ def _is_test_scoped(lines: list[str], idx: int, manifest: str) -> bool:
135
+ """True when the declaration is a test/provided dependency — a build-time coordinate
136
+ is not a statement that the running system talks to that external party."""
137
+ if manifest == "pom.xml":
138
+ for line in lines[idx: idx + _TEST_SCOPE_WINDOW + 1]:
139
+ if _TEST_SCOPE.search(line):
140
+ return True
141
+ return False
142
+ return bool(_GRADLE_TEST_CONF.match(lines[idx]))
143
+
144
+
145
+ def declared_integration_coordinates(
146
+ root: Optional[Path], *, manifests: Optional[Iterable[Path]] = None,
147
+ ) -> list[DeclaredClient]:
148
+ """Client libraries the build declares, deterministically ordered, deduplicated by
149
+ (kind, coordinate). Never raises: an unreadable manifest contributes nothing.
150
+ """
151
+ if root is None:
152
+ return []
153
+ root = Path(root)
154
+ paths = list(manifests) if manifests is not None else _manifest_paths(root)
155
+
156
+ seen: dict[tuple[str, str], DeclaredClient] = {}
157
+ for path in paths:
158
+ try:
159
+ lines = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8", errors="ignore").splitlines()
160
+ except OSError:
161
+ continue
162
+ try:
163
+ rel = str(path.relative_to(root)).replace("\\", "/")
164
+ except ValueError:
165
+ rel = path.name
166
+ for idx, line in enumerate(lines):
167
+ for coordinate, kind in _COORDINATE_KIND.items():
168
+ if coordinate not in line:
169
+ continue
170
+ if _is_test_scoped(lines, idx, path.name):
171
+ continue
172
+ key = (kind, coordinate)
173
+ if key not in seen:
174
+ seen[key] = DeclaredClient(kind, coordinate, f"{rel}:{idx + 1}")
175
+ return [seen[k] for k in sorted(seen)]
@@ -781,7 +781,9 @@ Blast-radius analysis: who calls a class and what breaks if it changes? Java onl
781
781
 
782
782
  Maps to: ask impact <target> <repo_path> [--depth <depth>]
783
783
  Returns: direct_callers, indirect_callers, endpoints_affected,
784
- transactional_boundaries_touched, risk_score, risk_level, stats.
784
+ transactional_boundaries_touched (target + callers),
785
+ transactional_boundaries_reaching (callers only), risk_score,
786
+ risk_level, stats.
785
787
 
786
788
  Use this when:
787
789
  - Planning a refactor: understand the full call chain before changing a class
sourcecode/mcp/server.py CHANGED
@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ def get_impact_chain(repo_path: str = ".", symbol: str = "", depth: int = 4) ->
890
890
  Returns: ImpactChainResult with schema_version, symbol, resolution,
891
891
  direct_callers, indirect_callers, endpoints_affected,
892
892
  transaction_boundary (propagation/isolation/read_only),
893
- security_surfaces (per-endpoint policy + finding IDs),
893
+ security_surfaces (per-endpoint verdict/confidence from the
894
+ security_posture authority + declared policy + finding IDs),
894
895
  impact_findings (TX-001..005 + SEC-001..003 findings in call chain),
895
896
  analysis_warnings, risk_level, confidence, metadata.
896
897
 
@@ -1320,7 +1321,9 @@ def get_impact_context(repo_path: str = ".", target: str = "", depth: int = 4) -
1320
1321
 
1321
1322
  Maps to: ask impact <target> <repo_path> [--depth <depth>]
1322
1323
  Returns: direct_callers, indirect_callers, endpoints_affected,
1323
- transactional_boundaries_touched, risk_score, risk_level, stats.
1324
+ transactional_boundaries_touched (target + callers),
1325
+ transactional_boundaries_reaching (callers only), risk_score,
1326
+ risk_level, stats.
1324
1327
 
1325
1328
  Use this when:
1326
1329
  - Planning a refactor: understand the full call chain before changing a class
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ from typing import Any, Iterable, Optional
26
26
  from sourcecode.caller_metrics import CALLER_METRIC_RECONCILIATION
27
27
  from sourcecode.endpoint_metrics import ENDPOINT_SURFACE_RECONCILIATION
28
28
  from sourcecode.fqn_utils import normalize_owner_fqn as _normalize_owner_fqn
29
+ from sourcecode.spring_semantic import (
30
+ boundaries_declared_within as _boundaries_declared_within,
31
+ build_tx_index_from_ir as _build_tx_index_from_ir,
32
+ )
29
33
  from sourcecode.path_filters import (
30
34
  is_test_path as _is_test_path,
31
35
  is_test_fixture_module_path as _is_test_fixture_module_path,
@@ -6803,6 +6807,7 @@ def compute_blast_radius(
6803
6807
  "security_surface_affected": [],
6804
6808
  "cross_module_impact": [],
6805
6809
  "transactional_boundaries_touched": [],
6810
+ "transactional_boundaries_reaching": [],
6806
6811
  "risk_score": 0.0,
6807
6812
  "risk_level": "unknown",
6808
6813
  "confidence_score": 0.0,
@@ -6828,6 +6833,7 @@ def compute_blast_radius(
6828
6833
  "security_surface_affected": [],
6829
6834
  "cross_module_impact": [],
6830
6835
  "transactional_boundaries_touched": [],
6836
+ "transactional_boundaries_reaching": [],
6831
6837
  "risk_score": 0.0,
6832
6838
  "risk_level": "unknown",
6833
6839
  "confidence_score": 0.0,
@@ -7134,23 +7140,19 @@ def compute_blast_radius(
7134
7140
  })
7135
7141
  cross_module_impact = cross_module_impact[:10]
7136
7142
 
7137
- # ── 7. Transactional boundaries touched ───────────────────────────────────
7138
- txn_nodes: list[str] = []
7139
- for node_dict in graph_nodes:
7140
- fqn = node_dict.get("fqn") or ""
7141
- role = node_dict.get("role") or ""
7142
- symbol_kind = node_dict.get("symbol_kind") or ""
7143
- if role == "transaction_boundary" or "Transactional" in (node_dict.get("canonical_name") or ""):
7144
- if fqn in affected_classes or _enclosing_class(fqn) in affected_classes:
7145
- txn_nodes.append(fqn)
7146
- elif symbol_kind == "method" and fqn in affected_classes:
7147
- enc = _enclosing_class(fqn)
7148
- for n2 in graph_nodes:
7149
- if n2.get("fqn") == enc and n2.get("role") == "transaction_boundary":
7150
- txn_nodes.append(fqn)
7151
- break
7152
-
7153
- txn_nodes = sorted(set(txn_nodes))
7143
+ # ── 7. Transactional boundaries ───────────────────────────────────────────
7144
+ # Both figures come from the one transaction-boundary authority (ADR-0008 R1);
7145
+ # they differ only in which symbols are asked about:
7146
+ # touched — the target and everything that calls it (what this change sits in)
7147
+ # reaching — the callers alone (what would run this change inside a transaction)
7148
+ # This used to be derived here from a graph node `role == "transaction_boundary"`
7149
+ # that no producer ever assigns, so `impact` reported 0 boundaries on repos where
7150
+ # `retrieve transactions-reaching` reported dozens, and `n_txn` never contributed
7151
+ # to the risk score or its escalation rules.
7152
+ _tx_index = _build_tx_index_from_ir(ir)
7153
+ _caller_symbols = set(direct_callers) | set(indirect_callers)
7154
+ txn_nodes = sorted({b.symbol for b in _boundaries_declared_within(_tx_index, affected_classes)})
7155
+ txn_reaching = sorted({b.symbol for b in _boundaries_declared_within(_tx_index, _caller_symbols)})
7154
7156
 
7155
7157
  # ── 8. Risk score ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
7156
7158
  n_direct = len(direct_callers)
@@ -7288,6 +7290,11 @@ def compute_blast_radius(
7288
7290
  "security_surface_affected": security_surface_affected,
7289
7291
  "cross_module_impact": cross_module_impact,
7290
7292
  "transactional_boundaries_touched": txn_nodes,
7293
+ # The callers-only subset: the boundaries that would run this change inside a
7294
+ # transaction. Same authority, narrower question — and the figure
7295
+ # `retrieve transactions-reaching` answers, so the two commands agree by
7296
+ # construction rather than by coincidence.
7297
+ "transactional_boundaries_reaching": txn_reaching,
7291
7298
  "depth_reached": _effective_depth, # actual BFS depth used, not the requested max
7292
7299
  "bfs_truncated": _bfs_truncated,
7293
7300
  "stats": {
@@ -7297,6 +7304,7 @@ def compute_blast_radius(
7297
7304
  "indirect_callers_sampled": _indirect_sampled,
7298
7305
  "endpoints_affected_count": n_ep,
7299
7306
  "transactional_boundaries_count": n_txn,
7307
+ "transactional_boundaries_reaching_count": len(txn_reaching),
7300
7308
  "mappers_affected_count": n_mappers,
7301
7309
  "modules_affected_count": n_modules,
7302
7310
  "security_surface_count": n_sec,
@@ -93,16 +93,18 @@ def resolve_execution_paths(step: Step, ctx: "StepContext") -> None:
93
93
  # ── transactions reaching (impact chain callers ∩ tx_index) ──────────────────────
94
94
  def resolve_transactions_reaching(step: Step, ctx: "StepContext") -> None:
95
95
  """The @Transactional boundaries whose enclosing class can reach the target through the
96
- call chain. Reuses run_impact_chain (reachability) + the tx boundary index."""
96
+ call chain. Reuses run_impact_chain (reachability) + the tx boundary index.
97
+
98
+ Membership is decided by the one transaction-boundary authority (ADR-0008 R1), the
99
+ same call `impact` makes for `transactional_boundaries_reaching` — so the two
100
+ commands answer this question with one number instead of two."""
97
101
  assert isinstance(step, ResolveTransactionsReaching)
102
+ from sourcecode.spring_semantic import boundaries_declared_within
103
+
98
104
  result = _impact_chain(ctx)
99
- caller_classes = {_enclosing_class(c) for c in result.direct_callers} | {
100
- _enclosing_class(c) for c in result.indirect_callers
101
- }
102
- boundaries = [
103
- b for b in ctx.knowledge.spring_model.tx_index.all_declared
104
- if _enclosing_class(b.symbol) in caller_classes
105
- ]
105
+ callers = set(result.direct_callers) | set(result.indirect_callers)
106
+ caller_classes = {_enclosing_class(c) for c in callers}
107
+ boundaries = boundaries_declared_within(ctx.knowledge.spring_model.tx_index, callers)
106
108
  ctx.put(
107
109
  SLOT_ENTITIES,
108
110
  [
@@ -123,7 +123,29 @@ def resolve_integration_inventory(step: Step, ctx: "StepContext") -> None:
123
123
  ],
124
124
  )
125
125
  ctx.put(SLOT_EVIDENCE, [_integration_evidence(i) for i in integrations])
126
- ctx.put(SLOT_OBSERVATIONS, _kind_histogram(integrations, key=lambda i: i.kind, label="integration"))
126
+ observations = _kind_histogram(integrations, key=lambda i: i.kind, label="integration")
127
+ # A client library the build declares but whose construct nothing imports is not an
128
+ # entry in this inventory — it is not an observed integration — but leaving it unsaid
129
+ # is how a `count: 0` came to sit in the same document as a directory client library
130
+ # in the stack block (ADR-0008 R12). Same coordinate authority `export --integrations`
131
+ # reads, so both surfaces recognize the same libraries.
132
+ from sourcecode.integration_coordinates import declared_integration_coordinates
133
+
134
+ _declared = declared_integration_coordinates(getattr(ctx.knowledge, "root", None))
135
+ _observed_kinds = {i.kind for i in integrations}
136
+ for d in _declared:
137
+ if d.kind in _observed_kinds:
138
+ continue
139
+ observations.append(Observation(
140
+ name=f"declared_not_observed:{d.kind}",
141
+ value=d.coordinate,
142
+ detail=(
143
+ f"the build declares this client at {d.evidence}; no client construct "
144
+ "found in source (a properties/YAML/XML-wired client has none) — "
145
+ "declared, not observed"
146
+ ),
147
+ ))
148
+ ctx.put(SLOT_OBSERVATIONS, observations)
127
149
  ctx.put(SLOT_CONFIDENCE, "high" if integrations else "medium")
128
150
  _add_service(ctx, "SemanticIntegrationEngine")
129
151
 
@@ -228,14 +228,18 @@ def _collect_usage(
228
228
  cir: "CanonicalRepositoryIR",
229
229
  ) -> tuple[dict[str, _AnnotationUsage], int, int, set[str]]:
230
230
  """Scan existing per-symbol annotations. Returns (usage_by_simple,
231
- total_handler_methods, total_non_handler_methods, handler_symbols).
231
+ handler_declarations, non_handler_declarations, handler_symbols).
232
232
 
233
233
  Controller-handler methods = the handler symbols of `cir.endpoints`; this is
234
234
  the authoritative endpoint surface (already structurally derived by the IR).
235
+
236
+ The two integers count **method declarations**, not distinct symbols: overloaded
237
+ methods share one FQN and are separate annotation sites, so on a real monolith 75
238
+ distinct handler symbols produced 90 declarations. Coverage below is measured
239
+ against declarations because that is what was scanned — the payload says so rather
240
+ than letting a reader assume it was endpoints (3574) or distinct methods (75).
235
241
  """
236
- handler_symbols: set[str] = {
237
- ep.handler_symbol for ep in cir.endpoints if getattr(ep, "handler_symbol", "")
238
- }
242
+ handler_symbols: set[str] = set(_handler_symbols(cir))
239
243
  controller_classes: set[str] = {
240
244
  ep.controller_class for ep in cir.endpoints if getattr(ep, "controller_class", "")
241
245
  }
@@ -389,6 +393,9 @@ def _detect_custom_gates(
389
393
  usage, total_handler, total_non_handler, _ = _collect_usage(cir)
390
394
  if total_handler == 0:
391
395
  return []
396
+ _population = endpoint_population(cir)
397
+ population_handler_methods = _population["handler_methods"]
398
+ population_endpoints = _population["endpoints"]
392
399
 
393
400
  verdicts: list[Verdict] = []
394
401
  for simple, u in sorted(usage.items()):
@@ -415,9 +422,22 @@ def _detect_custom_gates(
415
422
  # concrete name lives ONLY here, as evidence (VAI §0.5)
416
423
  "annotation": u.token,
417
424
  "coverage": round(coverage, 4),
418
- "coverage_pct": f"{round(coverage * 100)}% of controller handlers",
425
+ "coverage_pct": f"{round(coverage * 100)}% of controller handler method declarations",
426
+ # The denominator is stated in its own unit: handler *methods*, not
427
+ # endpoints. A repo with 936 handler methods can expose several thousand
428
+ # endpoints, so this percentage must never be read against an endpoint
429
+ # count (ADR-0008 — the payload states the unit, the reader does not guess).
430
+ "denominator": "controller handler method declarations",
419
431
  "handler_hits": u.handler_hits,
420
- "handler_total": total_handler,
432
+ # What the percentage was actually measured against: annotation sites on
433
+ # handler methods. Overloads share an FQN, so this is ≥ the distinct-method
434
+ # count and unrelated to the endpoint count.
435
+ "handler_declarations_total": total_handler,
436
+ # The other two units, stated beside it so no reader has to guess which one
437
+ # a percentage used — the exact confusion this payload caused in the field.
438
+ "handler_methods_total": population_handler_methods,
439
+ "endpoints_total": population_endpoints,
440
+ "handler_total": total_handler, # deprecated alias of handler_declarations_total
421
441
  "non_handler_hits": u.non_handler_hits,
422
442
  "specificity_ratio": (
423
443
  round(handler_rate / non_handler_rate, 2)
@@ -489,6 +509,106 @@ def gate_bearing_handlers(
489
509
  _GATE_COVERAGE_LIST_CAP = 200
490
510
 
491
511
 
512
+ def _handler_symbols(cir: "CanonicalRepositoryIR") -> set[str]:
513
+ """The distinct handler-method symbols behind the endpoint surface — the one place
514
+ this set is derived, so a count of it means the same thing everywhere."""
515
+ return {ep.handler_symbol for ep in cir.endpoints if getattr(ep, "handler_symbol", "")}
516
+
517
+
518
+ def endpoint_population(cir: "CanonicalRepositoryIR") -> dict:
519
+ """THE population every posture partition is measured against (ADR-0008 R1).
520
+
521
+ Two units live in this projection and they are not interchangeable: a repository
522
+ has more *endpoints* than *handler methods*, because one method can answer several
523
+ mappings. Reporting a count of one next to a count of the other under names that
524
+ both read as "handlers" is how a payload came to show 698 + 2635 against a total of
525
+ 3574 — three figures, no stated unit, and no way for a reader to tell which
526
+ denominator any percentage used.
527
+
528
+ Every count derived from either population MUST come from here and MUST say which
529
+ one it is.
530
+ """
531
+ return {
532
+ "endpoints": len(cir.endpoints),
533
+ "handler_methods": len(_handler_symbols(cir)),
534
+ "note": (
535
+ "Two units. 'endpoints' counts mapped routes (the denominator for every "
536
+ "endpoint partition below); 'handler_methods' counts the distinct methods "
537
+ "serving them. One method can serve several endpoints — measured on a real "
538
+ "monolith, 220 endpoints came from 75 methods — so the two never have to "
539
+ "match, and a figure is only comparable to others in its own unit."
540
+ ),
541
+ }
542
+
543
+
544
+ def unknown_endpoint_surface(reason: str, declared_policy: str = "") -> dict:
545
+ """The honest answer for an endpoint this authority cannot speak about.
546
+
547
+ Absence of a posture entry is absence of evidence: it is `coverage_unknown`
548
+ with the reason, never a coverage claim (ADR-0008 R9). The declared per-method
549
+ policy, if known, travels along as evidence — it is not the answer.
550
+ """
551
+ return {
552
+ "verdict": "coverage_unknown",
553
+ "confidence": Confidence.UNKNOWN.value,
554
+ "declared_policy": declared_policy or "unknown",
555
+ "reason": reason,
556
+ }
557
+
558
+
559
+ def endpoint_security_surface(
560
+ cir: "CanonicalRepositoryIR",
561
+ *,
562
+ root: Optional[Path] = None,
563
+ posture: Optional[Any] = None,
564
+ ) -> dict[str, dict]:
565
+ """THE per-endpoint security answer, keyed by ``endpoint_id`` (ADR-0008 R1).
566
+
567
+ One question — "what is known about the security of this endpoint?" — had two
568
+ producers: this module's four-way verdict, and `impact-chain`, which printed the
569
+ raw per-method policy under the name `security_policy`. Measured on Keycloak
570
+ (2026-07-28): the posture projection called 406 endpoints ``protected_custom``,
571
+ and **324 of those carry the declared policy ``none_detected``** because their
572
+ gate is a bespoke annotation with no standard vocabulary. `impact-chain` reported
573
+ exactly that string for the same `endpoint_id` — so one run of one tool answered
574
+ "guarded by a custom mechanism (Likely)" and "no security detected" about
575
+ ``DELETE /admin/realms/{realm}``. The declared policy is a fact about an
576
+ annotation; it was never an answer about coverage.
577
+
578
+ Consumers bind here instead of re-deriving. ``posture`` accepts an already-computed
579
+ :class:`SecurityPostureResult` or its ``to_dict()`` form, so a caller that has run
580
+ the security audit reuses that derivation rather than paying for a second one.
581
+
582
+ Never raises: any structural gap yields :func:`unknown_endpoint_surface`.
583
+ """
584
+ if posture is None:
585
+ try:
586
+ posture = infer_security_posture(cir, root=root)
587
+ except Exception:
588
+ return {}
589
+
590
+ verdicts: Any
591
+ if isinstance(posture, dict):
592
+ verdicts = posture.get("endpoints") or []
593
+ else:
594
+ verdicts = getattr(posture, "endpoint_verdicts", None) or []
595
+
596
+ out: dict[str, dict] = {}
597
+ for v in verdicts:
598
+ if not isinstance(v, dict):
599
+ continue
600
+ ep_id = v.get("endpoint_id") or ""
601
+ if not ep_id:
602
+ continue
603
+ out[ep_id] = {
604
+ "verdict": v.get("verdict") or "coverage_unknown",
605
+ "confidence": v.get("confidence") or Confidence.UNKNOWN.value,
606
+ # Evidence, not answer: the guard vocabulary declared on the handler.
607
+ "declared_policy": v.get("policy") or "unknown",
608
+ }
609
+ return out
610
+
611
+
492
612
  @dataclass
493
613
  class SecurityPostureResult:
494
614
  """Repo-level security-posture projection (P1-A)."""
@@ -499,6 +619,9 @@ class SecurityPostureResult:
499
619
  endpoint_verdicts: list[dict] = field(default_factory=list)
500
620
  rollup: dict = field(default_factory=dict)
501
621
  limitations: list[str] = field(default_factory=list)
622
+ # The population every partition in this projection is measured against, stated
623
+ # once so a reader never has to infer a denominator from a percentage.
624
+ population: dict = field(default_factory=dict)
502
625
  # Gate-coverage projection (P1-A follow-up): when a custom gate IS the detected
503
626
  # mechanism, which controller handlers do NOT carry it and are not standard-guarded
504
627
  # — the residue that relies solely on a centralized filter, if one exists. None when
@@ -522,6 +645,7 @@ class SecurityPostureResult:
522
645
  self.interception.to_dict() if self.interception else None
523
646
  ),
524
647
  "endpoints": self.endpoint_verdicts,
648
+ "population": dict(self.population),
525
649
  "rollup": self.rollup,
526
650
  **({"gate_coverage": self.gate_coverage} if self.gate_coverage else {}),
527
651
  "limitations": list(self.limitations),
@@ -552,6 +676,7 @@ def infer_security_posture(
552
676
  Never raises; never emits a categorical "unsecured" verdict.
553
677
  """
554
678
  security_model = str(cir.metadata.get("security_model", "unknown"))
679
+ population = endpoint_population(cir)
555
680
 
556
681
  # (0) config: names never drive detection — only upgrade confidence.
557
682
  configured: dict[str, Any] = {}
@@ -588,6 +713,11 @@ def infer_security_posture(
588
713
  # escape set: handlers that do NOT carry the detected custom gate and have no
589
714
  # standard guard of their own — the residue that relies solely on a filter.
590
715
  escaping: list[dict] = []
716
+ # Three-way partition of the SAME population (endpoints), counted in the one loop
717
+ # that visits every endpoint exactly once, so the parts sum to the whole by
718
+ # construction rather than by three producers agreeing after the fact.
719
+ n_gated = 0 # carries the detected custom gate
720
+ n_standard_only = 0 # no custom gate, but a standard guard of its own
591
721
 
592
722
  for ep in cir.endpoints:
593
723
  policy = ep.security.policy if ep.security is not None else "none_detected"
@@ -640,12 +770,12 @@ def infer_security_posture(
640
770
 
641
771
  # escape set (only meaningful when a custom gate is the mechanism): a handler
642
772
  # that neither carries the gate nor a standard guard nor a config-custom policy.
643
- if (
644
- has_custom_gate
645
- and not carries_gate
646
- and policy != "custom"
647
- and not _is_standard_guard_policy(policy)
648
- ):
773
+ _gated = carries_gate or policy == "custom"
774
+ if _gated:
775
+ n_gated += 1
776
+ elif _is_standard_guard_policy(policy):
777
+ n_standard_only += 1
778
+ if has_custom_gate and not _gated and not _is_standard_guard_policy(policy):
649
779
  escaping.append({
650
780
  "endpoint_id": ep.id,
651
781
  "method": ep.method,
@@ -692,13 +822,26 @@ def infer_security_posture(
692
822
  else:
693
823
  no_pattern += 1
694
824
 
695
- total_handlers = len(cir.endpoints)
825
+ total_handlers = population["endpoints"]
696
826
  not_covered = len(escaping)
697
827
  _patterns = (
698
828
  filter_surface.patterns if filter_surface and not filter_surface.is_empty() else []
699
829
  )
700
830
  gate_coverage = {
701
831
  "gate_annotations": sorted(gate_names),
832
+ # ── the endpoint partition: three parts, one population, they sum ──────
833
+ "population": "endpoints",
834
+ "endpoints_total": population["endpoints"],
835
+ "endpoints_carrying_gate": n_gated,
836
+ "endpoints_standard_guarded": n_standard_only,
837
+ "endpoints_not_carrying_gate": not_covered,
838
+ # ── a different unit, named as one ────────────────────────────────────
839
+ "handler_methods_total": population["handler_methods"],
840
+ "handler_methods_carrying_gate": len(gate_bearers),
841
+ # ── deprecated aliases (two-minor window) ─────────────────────────────
842
+ # `total_controller_handlers` always counted endpoints, and `gate_bearing`
843
+ # counted handler methods, so the two never belonged in one sum. Kept so no
844
+ # consumer breaks; read the explicit keys above.
702
845
  "total_controller_handlers": total_handlers,
703
846
  "gate_bearing": len(gate_bearers),
704
847
  "not_carrying_gate": not_covered,
@@ -713,12 +856,14 @@ def infer_security_posture(
713
856
  escaping, key=lambda d: (d["path"] or "", d["method"] or "")
714
857
  )[:_GATE_COVERAGE_LIST_CAP],
715
858
  "note": (
716
- "Handlers that do not carry the detected custom gate and have no standard "
717
- "guard. 'filter_pattern_match' marks those a declarative servlet filter "
718
- "(@WebFilter / web.xml) pattern covers — still review, pattern presence is "
719
- "not proof of enforcement. Spring FilterRegistrationBean / HttpSecurity DSL "
720
- "/ AspectJ pointcuts are NOT reconstructed, so a missing match is not proof "
721
- "of exposure."
859
+ "Endpoints whose handler does not carry the detected custom gate and has no "
860
+ "standard guard. 'filter_pattern_match' marks those a declarative servlet "
861
+ "filter (@WebFilter / web.xml) pattern covers — still review, pattern "
862
+ "presence is not proof of enforcement. Spring FilterRegistrationBean / "
863
+ "HttpSecurity DSL / AspectJ pointcuts are NOT reconstructed, so a missing "
864
+ "match is not proof of exposure. Counts marked endpoints_* partition the "
865
+ "endpoint population and sum to endpoints_total; handler_methods_* count a "
866
+ "different unit and are not comparable to them."
722
867
  ),
723
868
  "truncated": not_covered > _GATE_COVERAGE_LIST_CAP,
724
869
  }
@@ -730,6 +875,7 @@ def infer_security_posture(
730
875
  endpoint_verdicts=verdicts,
731
876
  rollup=rollup,
732
877
  limitations=limitations,
878
+ population=population,
733
879
  gate_coverage=gate_coverage,
734
880
  )
735
881
  # keep reference to suppress-set so callers (SEC-001) can dedupe false alarms
@@ -288,9 +288,23 @@ class SemanticIntegrationEngine:
288
288
  "runtime/DI-wired clients remain out of static scope."
289
289
  )
290
290
 
291
- def as_report(self, n_files: Optional[int] = None) -> dict:
291
+ def as_report(
292
+ self,
293
+ n_files: Optional[int] = None,
294
+ *,
295
+ declared: "Optional[list]" = None,
296
+ ) -> dict:
292
297
  """Same output contract as integration_detector.detect_integrations, so the
293
- `export --integrations` / C4 external_systems consumer is unchanged."""
298
+ `export --integrations` / C4 external_systems consumer is unchanged.
299
+
300
+ ``declared`` — the build's declared client libraries from the coordinate
301
+ authority (:mod:`sourcecode.integration_coordinates`). They are reported in
302
+ their own block and never counted as integrations: a coordinate says the build
303
+ declares a client, not that the code uses one. Passing them is what stops this
304
+ report from answering `count: 0` in a document whose stack block lists a client
305
+ library for the same external system (ADR-0008 R12/R14) — a contradiction that
306
+ survived two releases on the LDAP surface.
307
+ """
294
308
  recs = self.detect()
295
309
  by_kind: dict[str, int] = {}
296
310
  for r in recs:
@@ -306,11 +320,49 @@ class SemanticIntegrationEngine:
306
320
  if r.confidence is not None:
307
321
  rec["confidence"] = r.confidence
308
322
  integrations.append(rec)
323
+
324
+ declared_list = list(declared or [])
325
+ observed_kinds = set(by_kind)
326
+ declared_block = [
327
+ {**d.to_dict(), "observed_in_source": d.kind in observed_kinds}
328
+ for d in declared_list
329
+ ]
330
+ declared_not_observed = sorted(
331
+ {d.kind for d in declared_list} - observed_kinds
332
+ )
333
+ if declared_not_observed:
334
+ _cites = "; ".join(
335
+ f"{d.kind} ({d.coordinate} at {d.evidence})"
336
+ for d in declared_list if d.kind in set(declared_not_observed)
337
+ )
338
+ coverage_reason = (
339
+ f"{coverage_reason} The build DECLARES a client library for "
340
+ f"{len(declared_not_observed)} kind(s) with no client construct in "
341
+ f"source — {_cites}. A configuration-wired client (properties, YAML, "
342
+ "XML, or a starter's auto-configuration) is not statically visible as a "
343
+ "construct, so read these as declared-not-observed, neither as an "
344
+ "integration record nor as their absence."
345
+ )
346
+
309
347
  return {
310
348
  "integrations": integrations,
311
349
  "by_kind": {k: by_kind[k] for k in sorted(by_kind)},
312
350
  "count": len(recs),
313
351
  "confidence": "observed" if recs else "not_analyzed",
352
+ # Declared ≠ observed. Two facts about the same external system, each under
353
+ # its own name and its own evidence, so no reader has to reconcile a count of
354
+ # 0 here against a client library named in the stack block.
355
+ "declared_clients": declared_block,
356
+ "declared_clients_count": len(declared_block),
357
+ "kinds_declared_not_observed": declared_not_observed,
358
+ "declared_clients_note": (
359
+ "Client libraries the BUILD declares (Maven/Gradle coordinates, "
360
+ "test/provided scope excluded). Evidence of a declared client, never of "
361
+ "an observed integration: a coordinate does not prove the code uses it, "
362
+ "and its absence from `integrations` does not prove the system does not "
363
+ "talk to that party — a properties/YAML/XML-wired client has no construct "
364
+ "to find."
365
+ ),
314
366
  "coverage_confidence": coverage_confidence,
315
367
  "coverage_confidence_reason": coverage_reason,
316
368
  "coverage_note": (
@@ -96,7 +96,13 @@ class AffectedEndpoint:
96
96
  controller_class: str
97
97
  handler_symbol: str
98
98
  source_file: str
99
- security_policy: str # e.g. "spring_pre_authorize", "none_detected", "unknown"
99
+ # Guard vocabulary DECLARED on the handler ("spring_pre_authorize",
100
+ # "none_detected", "unknown"). Evidence about an annotation — never a statement
101
+ # about whether the route is covered. The coverage answer is `security_verdict`,
102
+ # bound from the one authority (security_posture.endpoint_security_surface).
103
+ security_policy: str
104
+ security_verdict: str = "coverage_unknown"
105
+ security_confidence: str = "Unknown"
100
106
 
101
107
  def to_dict(self) -> dict:
102
108
  return {
@@ -106,6 +112,9 @@ class AffectedEndpoint:
106
112
  "controller_class": self.controller_class,
107
113
  "handler_symbol": self.handler_symbol,
108
114
  "source_file": self.source_file,
115
+ "security_verdict": self.security_verdict,
116
+ "security_confidence": self.security_confidence,
117
+ # kept for consumers reading the declared annotation; see the field note
109
118
  "security_policy": self.security_policy,
110
119
  }
111
120
 
@@ -863,11 +872,43 @@ def _build_chain_explanation(
863
872
  # Security surface aggregation
864
873
  # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
865
874
 
875
+ def _bind_security_surface(
876
+ endpoints_affected: list[AffectedEndpoint],
877
+ surface: dict[str, dict],
878
+ *,
879
+ unavailable_reason: str = "",
880
+ ) -> None:
881
+ """Bind each affected endpoint to the one security authority, in place.
882
+
883
+ An endpoint the authority does not speak about (or an authority that could not
884
+ be built) is `coverage_unknown` with its reason — never the declared policy
885
+ reused as a coverage claim (ADR-0008 R9).
886
+ """
887
+ from sourcecode.security_posture import unknown_endpoint_surface
888
+
889
+ for ep in endpoints_affected:
890
+ answer = surface.get(ep.endpoint_id)
891
+ if answer is None:
892
+ answer = unknown_endpoint_surface(
893
+ unavailable_reason
894
+ or "endpoint is not present in the security-posture projection",
895
+ declared_policy=ep.security_policy,
896
+ )
897
+ ep.security_verdict = answer.get("verdict", "coverage_unknown")
898
+ ep.security_confidence = answer.get("confidence", "Unknown")
899
+
900
+
866
901
  def _build_security_surfaces(
867
902
  endpoints_affected: list[AffectedEndpoint],
868
903
  impact_findings: list[SpringFinding],
869
904
  ) -> list[dict]:
870
- """Per-endpoint security surface with associated finding IDs."""
905
+ """Per-endpoint security surface with associated finding IDs.
906
+
907
+ The surface reports the authority's verdict (`security_posture`); the declared
908
+ annotation policy travels with it as evidence. Emitting the declared policy
909
+ alone is what made this command answer "none_detected" for 324 Keycloak
910
+ endpoints the same run classified `protected_custom`.
911
+ """
871
912
  finding_by_ep: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
872
913
  for f in impact_findings:
873
914
  if f.category == "security":
@@ -881,6 +922,11 @@ def _build_security_surfaces(
881
922
  "endpoint_id": ep.endpoint_id,
882
923
  "method": ep.method,
883
924
  "path": ep.path,
925
+ "verdict": ep.security_verdict,
926
+ "confidence": ep.security_confidence,
927
+ "declared_policy": ep.security_policy,
928
+ # deprecated alias of `declared_policy` (two-minor window): it always
929
+ # carried the declared annotation, never a coverage verdict.
884
930
  "security_policy": ep.security_policy,
885
931
  "security_findings": finding_by_ep.get(ep.endpoint_id, []),
886
932
  })
@@ -1102,10 +1148,13 @@ class ImpactOrchestrator:
1102
1148
  pass
1103
1149
 
1104
1150
  # ── 5. TX + SEC audit findings, filtered to call chain ────────────
1151
+ # The security audit already derives the posture projection; take it from
1152
+ # there rather than deriving the same answer a second time (ADR-0008 R1).
1153
+ posture_dict: dict = {}
1105
1154
  if prebuilt_findings is not None:
1106
1155
  all_findings = prebuilt_findings
1107
1156
  else:
1108
- all_findings = _run_audit_for_chain(cir, model, root)
1157
+ all_findings, posture_dict = _run_audit_for_chain(cir, model, root)
1109
1158
 
1110
1159
  impact_findings_raw = _filter_findings(
1111
1160
  all_findings, seed_fqns, direct_callers_raw, indirect_callers_raw,
@@ -1118,6 +1167,18 @@ class ImpactOrchestrator:
1118
1167
  impact_findings = [f.to_dict() for f in impact_findings_raw]
1119
1168
 
1120
1169
  # ── 6. Security surfaces ──────────────────────────────────────────
1170
+ security_surface_index, surface_gap = _endpoint_security_authority(
1171
+ cir, root, posture_dict,
1172
+ )
1173
+ # The gap is only worth a warning when it actually withheld an answer:
1174
+ # a repo with no affected endpoints is not missing a security surface.
1175
+ surface_gap_warned = False
1176
+ if surface_gap and endpoints_affected:
1177
+ warnings.append(surface_gap)
1178
+ surface_gap_warned = True
1179
+ _bind_security_surface(
1180
+ endpoints_affected, security_surface_index, unavailable_reason=surface_gap,
1181
+ )
1121
1182
  security_surfaces = _build_security_surfaces(endpoints_affected, impact_findings_raw)
1122
1183
 
1123
1184
  # ── 7. Risk ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -1176,6 +1237,13 @@ class ImpactOrchestrator:
1176
1237
  key=lambda f: (SEVERITY_ORDER.get(f.severity, 9), f.symbol)
1177
1238
  )
1178
1239
  impact_findings = [f.to_dict() for f in impact_findings_raw]
1240
+ _bind_security_surface(
1241
+ endpoints_affected, security_surface_index,
1242
+ unavailable_reason=surface_gap,
1243
+ )
1244
+ if surface_gap and endpoints_affected and not surface_gap_warned:
1245
+ warnings.append(surface_gap)
1246
+ surface_gap_warned = True
1179
1247
  security_surfaces = _build_security_surfaces(endpoints_affected, impact_findings_raw)
1180
1248
  risk_level, risk_score, risk_score_raw = _compute_risk(
1181
1249
  len(direct_callers), len(indirect_callers),
@@ -1456,16 +1524,21 @@ def _run_audit_for_chain(
1456
1524
  cir: CanonicalRepositoryIR,
1457
1525
  model: SpringSemanticModel,
1458
1526
  root: Optional[Path],
1459
- ) -> list[SpringFinding]:
1460
- """Run TX + SEC audit and return combined findings list.
1527
+ ) -> tuple[list[SpringFinding], dict]:
1528
+ """Run TX + SEC audit; return (combined findings, security-posture projection).
1529
+
1530
+ The posture travels out with the findings because the security audit already
1531
+ derives it — the impact chain binds to that derivation instead of computing a
1532
+ second answer to the same question (ADR-0008 R1).
1461
1533
 
1462
1534
  Uses the pre-built model — no duplicate CIR traversal.
1463
- Never raises; returns [] on any error.
1535
+ Never raises; returns ([], {}) on any error.
1464
1536
  """
1465
1537
  from sourcecode.spring_security_audit import run_security_audit
1466
1538
  from sourcecode.spring_tx_analyzer import run_tx_audit
1467
1539
 
1468
1540
  findings: list[SpringFinding] = []
1541
+ posture: dict = {}
1469
1542
  try:
1470
1543
  tx_result = run_tx_audit(cir, root=root, model=model)
1471
1544
  findings.extend(tx_result.findings)
@@ -1474,9 +1547,53 @@ def _run_audit_for_chain(
1474
1547
  try:
1475
1548
  sec_result = run_security_audit(cir, root=root, model=model)
1476
1549
  findings.extend(sec_result.findings)
1550
+ posture = getattr(sec_result, "security_posture", None) or {}
1551
+ except Exception:
1552
+ pass
1553
+ return findings, posture
1554
+
1555
+
1556
+ # Per-CIR memo of the endpoint security authority's answer (one derivation per repo).
1557
+ _SURFACE_CACHE_ATTR = "_impact_endpoint_security_surface"
1558
+
1559
+
1560
+ def _endpoint_security_authority(
1561
+ cir: CanonicalRepositoryIR,
1562
+ root: Optional[Path],
1563
+ posture: dict,
1564
+ ) -> tuple[dict[str, dict], str]:
1565
+ """(endpoint_id → security answer, reason it is unavailable).
1566
+
1567
+ Reuses ``posture`` when the audit already produced it; otherwise asks the
1568
+ authority directly (the `prebuilt_findings` path, where no audit ran here).
1569
+ Memoized on the CIR because `pr-impact` issues one query per changed class
1570
+ against the same repository — reuse is what keeps "one authority" from meaning
1571
+ "one full projection per query".
1572
+ """
1573
+ from sourcecode.security_posture import endpoint_security_surface
1574
+
1575
+ cached = getattr(cir, _SURFACE_CACHE_ATTR, None)
1576
+ if cached is not None:
1577
+ return cached
1578
+
1579
+ try:
1580
+ surface = endpoint_security_surface(
1581
+ cir, root=root, posture=posture or None,
1582
+ )
1583
+ except Exception:
1584
+ surface = {}
1585
+ if not surface:
1586
+ answer = ({}, (
1587
+ "security-posture projection unavailable for this repository; every "
1588
+ "endpoint security answer is coverage_unknown (absence of evidence)"
1589
+ ))
1590
+ else:
1591
+ answer = (surface, "")
1592
+ try:
1593
+ setattr(cir, _SURFACE_CACHE_ATTR, answer)
1477
1594
  except Exception:
1478
1595
  pass
1479
- return findings
1596
+ return answer
1480
1597
 
1481
1598
 
1482
1599
  # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ from __future__ import annotations
16
16
  import re
17
17
  import time
18
18
  from dataclasses import dataclass, field
19
- from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Optional
19
+ from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Iterable, Optional
20
20
 
21
21
  if TYPE_CHECKING:
22
22
  from sourcecode.canonical_ir import CanonicalRepositoryIR
@@ -295,12 +295,24 @@ def build_tx_index(cir: "CanonicalRepositoryIR") -> TransactionBoundaryIndex:
295
295
  3. Method-level boundaries override class-level for the same method.
296
296
  4. Class-level boundaries are inherited by methods that lack their own.
297
297
  """
298
+ return build_tx_index_from_ir(
299
+ getattr(cir, "_raw_ir", {}) or {}, repo_id=getattr(cir, "cir_hash", "")[:16]
300
+ )
301
+
302
+
303
+ def build_tx_index_from_ir(raw_ir: dict, repo_id: str = "") -> TransactionBoundaryIndex:
304
+ """Same index, built straight from a repo IR dict.
305
+
306
+ THE authority for "where are the @Transactional boundaries" (ADR-0008 R1).
307
+ `build_tx_index` is the CanonicalRepositoryIR-shaped entry point; consumers that
308
+ hold the raw IR dict (blast radius) call this one instead of re-deriving
309
+ boundaries from graph node roles. Both produce the same index from the same nodes.
310
+ """
298
311
  t0 = time.monotonic()
299
- index = TransactionBoundaryIndex(repo_id=getattr(cir, "cir_hash", "")[:16])
312
+ index = TransactionBoundaryIndex(repo_id=repo_id)
300
313
 
301
314
  try:
302
- raw_ir = getattr(cir, "_raw_ir", {}) or {}
303
- graph = raw_ir.get("graph") or {}
315
+ graph = (raw_ir or {}).get("graph") or {}
304
316
  nodes = graph.get("nodes") or []
305
317
 
306
318
  # Pass 1: build meta-@Transactional map from annotation-type nodes.
@@ -378,3 +390,43 @@ def build_tx_index(cir: "CanonicalRepositoryIR") -> TransactionBoundaryIndex:
378
390
 
379
391
  index.build_time_ms = round((time.monotonic() - t0) * 1000, 2)
380
392
  return index
393
+
394
+
395
+ def boundaries_declared_within(
396
+ index: TransactionBoundaryIndex, symbols: "Iterable[str]"
397
+ ) -> list[TransactionBoundary]:
398
+ """The @Transactional declaration sites carried by *symbols*, ordered by symbol.
399
+
400
+ THE authority for "which transaction boundaries belong to this set of symbols"
401
+ (ADR-0008 R1). Every consumer that reports transaction boundaries over a set of
402
+ symbols — a blast radius, a caller closure, a module — calls this. A consumer that
403
+ re-derives the answer from graph node roles, annotation strings or naming is in
404
+ violation of the ADR, and is how `impact` came to report 0 boundaries where
405
+ `retrieve transactions-reaching` reported 47 on the same symbol.
406
+
407
+ Membership follows Spring's own inheritance, in both directions and no further:
408
+
409
+ - the declaration site itself is in the set;
410
+ - a **class**-level boundary when a method of that class is in the set (the method
411
+ runs inside it);
412
+ - a **method**-level boundary when its class is in the set (asking about a class asks
413
+ about the methods it declares).
414
+
415
+ Asking about one method does *not* pull in a sibling method's own boundary — that
416
+ sibling is a different code path, and reporting it would be the kind of quietly
417
+ inflated count this authority exists to prevent.
418
+ """
419
+ wanted = {s for s in symbols if s}
420
+ if not wanted:
421
+ return []
422
+ declaring_classes = {s.split("#", 1)[0] for s in wanted if "#" in s}
423
+
424
+ def _belongs(b: TransactionBoundary) -> bool:
425
+ if b.symbol in wanted:
426
+ return True
427
+ if b.scope == "class":
428
+ return b.symbol in declaring_classes
429
+ return _enclosing_class(b.symbol) in wanted
430
+
431
+ found = [b for b in index.all_declared if _belongs(b)]
432
+ return sorted(found, key=lambda b: (b.symbol, b.scope, b.source_file))
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
2
  Name: sourcecode
3
- Version: 3.1.1
3
+ Version: 3.2.0
4
4
  Summary: Persistent structural context and ultra-fast repeated analysis for AI coding agents
5
5
  License-File: LICENSE
6
6
  Keywords: agents,ai,codebase,context,developer-tools,llm
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1
- sourcecode/__init__.py,sha256=gL2tqDxnoKJo0NZ97V-BftlhGDV-Hcty4joUrxJ6XF0,308
1
+ sourcecode/__init__.py,sha256=4hwV87XY8dgmsv4RaWkZzBMSpB_T8EQ4A9_-xB5CzmI,308
2
2
  sourcecode/adaptive_scanner.py,sha256=yJBKjNpkY6bpueYJ2YnRezen3sYZDecEt7WaaNWdqug,9466
3
3
  sourcecode/archetype.py,sha256=qWMCyL2UzSGXJhCIZj38JjS7wI15EE3eILsWiaoCZXQ,35779
4
4
  sourcecode/architectural_baseline.py,sha256=7QzJri4pbL3nzAn9gNutZW6mZR8HHD6H2C2H1EEwYPE,17904
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ sourcecode/chain_rules.py,sha256=1kLHv1t7g5rMmycIYSpm3az8SjCr01Xw7LtyV2tNhSA,106
14
14
  sourcecode/change_plan.py,sha256=MNgNyu4zrLGvBBaXPwyCh-T2ZGaUQX3Hm4W87uuhZ3w,7750
15
15
  sourcecode/cir_graphs.py,sha256=9G0HHj1kw2325IDyzo2OpX73BNswEckecf4MZUXB4JM,12078
16
16
  sourcecode/classifier.py,sha256=JBzPwSSrDG-tUHAbcKB678HRbjLpD-ohzbzzO62mgpo,20114
17
- sourcecode/cli.py,sha256=d6ztendlmJIuXvXqb2uoaJmZnO_nisPmsChdJBgjycU,398039
17
+ sourcecode/cli.py,sha256=F7HXBOhTrzLppk81GDazz6sIvowkZomei1MCRXaTutc,400663
18
18
  sourcecode/code_notes_analyzer.py,sha256=EJemNCNc9Dn-1RZYu-aNbK0ELzmsyC4s6FdHi3XyNEI,9392
19
19
  sourcecode/compare.py,sha256=jdePg0dNCxFpysiTGMsROL5XABLjy_zVUgVeySvdb0o,7514
20
20
  sourcecode/confidence_analyzer.py,sha256=vnbPI-20FnHdjO6STxHW8fbaxmB4A7y58io63ibFZjc,21586
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ sourcecode/git_analyzer.py,sha256=irvEwddbd5_tbA_eYUZebf4mH7_nFhpjwaWAV1f7jUY,15
48
48
  sourcecode/graph_analyzer.py,sha256=lp0eB1PWC20BYF-GpPhAyegRpKrUKgOmXZIcZSIX_Ks,65777
49
49
  sourcecode/graph_evidence.py,sha256=rENNsYRZeNstX_ExNCLlbHJAruFQwxo5d00x6wO3xwI,15030
50
50
  sourcecode/hibernate_strat.py,sha256=5GmHiB865HxKdvaxeFV07ojglUgxyOP41AY2xiHfV30,61700
51
+ sourcecode/integration_coordinates.py,sha256=7vGFxN4tCn_KTisYFJuixa8XkyHBoasEFB3fqM62OBI,7407
51
52
  sourcecode/jdk_exports.py,sha256=fCrlwNAXUT9gge_joq6kMnY3zJxYB2pxqy-0w3o3MJI,874
52
53
  sourcecode/license.py,sha256=keFuwNxdAtvK2Ds91Wl79GMYxuxWYnN5Wbw1qBpaoUI,24896
53
54
  sourcecode/mcp_nudge.py,sha256=lKemOqK_wny2u7Ymcr2Idi5Kx8pXY02jCi-_nJYLGMg,2992
@@ -71,26 +72,26 @@ sourcecode/redactor.py,sha256=SB4hwIvg8h-hvcqKcDWaZvA-aSyn-at-BIRwa0tUv5E,3227
71
72
  sourcecode/relevance_scorer.py,sha256=0AgEt4KrV73nioMqBgjhGjtY7L2C7L7cSyKtj3IKcrw,9408
72
73
  sourcecode/rename_refactor.py,sha256=h6dNFlB9aZ_3q6heeHBkgXQeXaT03nvPSsYH6P8qxFg,12965
73
74
  sourcecode/repo_classifier.py,sha256=FG1vaWKdWXsWdl-S8hjVMiTqcwgaRXkDyvK4rPcOGtQ,22681
74
- sourcecode/repository_ir.py,sha256=ynno-4M3iBWetuKCiZ2rfbe_fd6MibGxf1X3bXF1-18,343766
75
+ sourcecode/repository_ir.py,sha256=2S14aUMY5vpZePObd3F87kz71KUsVXQllurXjufa6A0,344648
75
76
  sourcecode/ris.py,sha256=Hw8TakTQ6hku-Abf2k8954NwkrH_sP73_8wVH8x5khc,22079
76
77
  sourcecode/runtime_classifier.py,sha256=uTAD6BDCiBLUZEDRfqk718kM4RTT_vAbfkcOI2_Xx58,18432
77
78
  sourcecode/scanner.py,sha256=z3CV0rcGunu0Y8mpNgp07wI7nxT0pxw1BkXRRtI0Rpo,9609
78
79
  sourcecode/schema.py,sha256=aHNXDf8LGyUC8ZDE_VS9kiskC2-Oswhi_WnpdGy6HDw,24897
79
80
  sourcecode/security_config.py,sha256=KblMEoRiEjrIE68YsPaUAFebxFp8UM7MS7lAk5CGD8U,3531
80
- sourcecode/security_posture.py,sha256=OqVNAnBAQ3ehRDi5_3wcMO3Mwn2MSppLWjGS3GdsyVg,32152
81
+ sourcecode/security_posture.py,sha256=0tKL_RafS0dYY5W__JTeJIfopd8f-DyKEerHrvA3-Mg,40243
81
82
  sourcecode/semantic_analyzer.py,sha256=bpgdC6m0_ftVtRf3rSdwhbhWjnZnGxRXaZVcfe4BbcQ,95414
82
83
  sourcecode/semantic_impact_engine.py,sha256=t09IirGC3JjQDy33JZd1_WKzQVKXkoNl3-XEUr5kjis,20563
83
- sourcecode/semantic_integration_engine.py,sha256=TDq8XrFBAjnAXRSZLjHSRLK67U-WLeA_SEECCaLwPEg,16196
84
+ sourcecode/semantic_integration_engine.py,sha256=7a0WqAInOv39f0Yr_94TYo_JP_8QpeI9KGaknpzAyQU,18899
84
85
  sourcecode/semantic_services.py,sha256=nbUuPv-F01USTt_9CHT8iy_ucCIw3fz4W3Aquea_pd4,10782
85
86
  sourcecode/serializer.py,sha256=BAGL2J3G3bHvJS60OcxekPvTJg8x6b1LzeLKFbGaots,131497
86
87
  sourcecode/spring_event_topology.py,sha256=5_ON_21Le5zbG-1GRc5GLIi5HJfy_QjcXLVPC5WeUGQ,18055
87
88
  sourcecode/spring_findings.py,sha256=ICcR2qEZgYzWypZzsoaEmVeMYZ0YkuZ8AvTwA-rcVOs,7604
88
- sourcecode/spring_impact.py,sha256=Y2oUZDCeMZ6-fNYLUviC5DgiJfllE-l0yAZR7IabmxM,75083
89
+ sourcecode/spring_impact.py,sha256=Cm2KZplpQHjdjUC8jPX1SNnLHxOdM3HsUBNFGwgTP18,80145
89
90
  sourcecode/spring_model.py,sha256=zOAgFmrRbG4a6KLm1TJl55aWMyPNsz3OS3FSczqPG6A,16594
90
91
  sourcecode/spring_profiles.py,sha256=YPgBH3RuML-mtid7YwUMfA9sfSXPZwknYL7UvRMoYbE,7946
91
92
  sourcecode/spring_properties.py,sha256=bQSOVrtj7YENsCjMQTTlVh-Gm_K0n0DdWzjPRUP38C4,8394
92
93
  sourcecode/spring_security_audit.py,sha256=FteXv5GH-iE07GLEqPpoX7sVXf_dxRns8zxh9_m6By0,23015
93
- sourcecode/spring_semantic.py,sha256=jteQ1PkY9ArFJv0embg_jBIdbOxqrk9mQ2Xz8OF_FKA,14214
94
+ sourcecode/spring_semantic.py,sha256=UrmLg_4gmBVmMqvSnUMgSReVEERVGv3X7LYDBEs6k_o,16598
94
95
  sourcecode/spring_tx_analyzer.py,sha256=lp0h5Pzzd3fPxHAAagMmG8PqR1-v2uVpFIG1o7tCWQs,41148
95
96
  sourcecode/summarizer.py,sha256=sr0-tfecFKCr-fSkPPWbl-t9HC7SY2ZxkjnnXX8DB2A,26621
96
97
  sourcecode/token_estimate.py,sha256=ZP3C54aQLExuf32Yvrjok2TAS2oSSyNVRA_HjhsD6Eg,7165
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ sourcecode/detectors/elixir.py,sha256=jCpvt5Yi6jvplc80ovRtWh17q-11ZGo9qX7o8b57TJ
112
113
  sourcecode/detectors/go.py,sha256=2r66uRQfeTWsqxr4HDhT6vExZErby0t46QXLHVBRv9w,2782
113
114
  sourcecode/detectors/heuristic.py,sha256=7cRxrip4yIaggYzZJB6ef8yHKh-gHgiH_pXMFcjlyFU,3723
114
115
  sourcecode/detectors/hybrid.py,sha256=IGFRUVsAZ1ooRlFdznCeJAV6vy1yVDx-VyghvLtddXc,9101
115
- sourcecode/detectors/java.py,sha256=M8RZZkryXSDTWDZnmmnuPlZpKX9hnZ7eQy0Rh-eG3_I,44746
116
+ sourcecode/detectors/java.py,sha256=v47yvL4mftcK35cVBpO7gru6O5AcEaKml-OoNyVU0Bg,45246
116
117
  sourcecode/detectors/jvm_ext.py,sha256=EgHJ5W8EE-ZTN9V607mVzohyKgZE8Mc2jCi-DF8RAZU,2616
117
118
  sourcecode/detectors/nodejs.py,sha256=Hg3Gmr7yIMJFiLoDwOTk2wtu00wxIs6kZf-oQujTFUA,13187
118
119
  sourcecode/detectors/parsers.py,sha256=ug9K31tyHqinmv0HkIVQVjdTZpBv67FYKAEf52YXOSM,3178
@@ -126,9 +127,9 @@ sourcecode/detectors/terraform.py,sha256=cxORPR_zVLOJpHlh4e9JnFpkQsn_UnqMMom5yG6
126
127
  sourcecode/detectors/tooling.py,sha256=8CKbtxwQoABP-WyBRNmdAmHDOvAH57AR1cF4UKuWEdQ,2074
127
128
  sourcecode/mcp/__init__.py,sha256=XU4HfRGbdid8wdUA0x_4f7uKZD1z3mv_XUY_WU_T9Mw,179
128
129
  sourcecode/mcp/orchestrator.py,sha256=diVoQgn24QmgPL3Ev8Sp6hsvh02OqY3MktHXOzrlodo,36525
129
- sourcecode/mcp/registry.py,sha256=OCUCRLPRM176FCw850rF7dNh74f5Zj0h3a9lpxrf8mI,68171
130
+ sourcecode/mcp/registry.py,sha256=1qIcwtl01AGjEM3yMOwYgr_Ck3y-LZeRvh8i70Nhl_w,68258
130
131
  sourcecode/mcp/runner.py,sha256=RGimCwhLyHxjCvH7q72y12HWEnATXZLC-NBWhkzlu0I,2852
131
- sourcecode/mcp/server.py,sha256=P6JqQrlat2jP8OK0ysxSWNwqfUYF-bTc3X05FszR1_4,65180
132
+ sourcecode/mcp/server.py,sha256=GH7bgJRVVkBJf-orj_Zmn_mEqMENG76-KNREJS7E5FY,65354
132
133
  sourcecode/mcp/onboarding/__init__.py,sha256=sj2PWqEBmMc4zBNkomg89WtL0M6S7A9yb7_wAuSWNP4,66
133
134
  sourcecode/mcp/onboarding/applier.py,sha256=Sx9vHTaXr_M1Bs4uMjO7qa_a2_p4J9oz93oJsKQ7ds4,3298
134
135
  sourcecode/mcp/onboarding/backup.py,sha256=ihqGOR8QTX8HASRSEDyfFyXr5bkXrygPHamv4p9KTmk,1452
@@ -147,9 +148,9 @@ sourcecode/retrieval/retriever.py,sha256=YdnbaXaWhFKyShuuE6fj36GfgpuGetqOFzx7_D2
147
148
  sourcecode/retrieval/runtime.py,sha256=ODQlPqyS4OfMtCb1oEA_0t7vK0uKPBLhB4K2CnytPUU,10822
148
149
  sourcecode/retrieval/steps.py,sha256=wyOiO84fuDgdd-HdugzGSEriN-lN891PTc3gU7lgcmI,9959
149
150
  sourcecode/retrieval/steps_endpoint.py,sha256=H_o4YsqgM198ZHtJg-UzhcmnFzbBeaYXrPNIDoc2IjI,13526
150
- sourcecode/retrieval/steps_graph.py,sha256=epr3V8qGtmFrhDnlk0ZC8eyr5-TDIhY-eiWNB5UJ0Uw,10447
151
+ sourcecode/retrieval/steps_graph.py,sha256=E45vN9pA1lpKQ4pO2JP9-1cwIXoy1hWW6jsBDryeHGM,10684
151
152
  sourcecode/retrieval/steps_impact.py,sha256=M0AwU5Ue7nkj-A7DYgQI2BP0BV1b0TFZRrYIydF-Ajw,11605
152
- sourcecode/retrieval/steps_intf.py,sha256=BAh2oODyzaHpIfLwpAzE_mbG-QGXDSy60dgTROFFbzE,10549
153
+ sourcecode/retrieval/steps_intf.py,sha256=BIopGUhxwutV51r8-1bTCC_VTYENJiHbREF13pB5mSo,11697
153
154
  sourcecode/retrieval/steps_struct.py,sha256=jO9L49hziTlS_xhuhCGUavgyAL3ZAnJSOZB-UA4GaRM,13893
154
155
  sourcecode/retrieval/steps_txsec.py,sha256=LKRzALzRw_0aQ3_tpbd34mt8u7o690g5tCnp871j7P4,17804
155
156
  sourcecode/schemas/envelope-v1.schema.json,sha256=lABkyKqXND039JUY2R6KK47OCDco5mq5PLgkcCXFhOQ,3477
@@ -159,8 +160,8 @@ sourcecode/telemetry/consent.py,sha256=GuhCiA_x2n3LwGBkZnvyIwtFcf5Zwa8O0DdLqkATI
159
160
  sourcecode/telemetry/events.py,sha256=4_yeO58U-Cwc1Qb27VB0_EjhmroY0k91n3_VGxeALB8,2776
160
161
  sourcecode/telemetry/filters.py,sha256=RzxauTz8HliO4BllQnXEXc7zTeqdCZi5MgqGEDuW7OQ,6570
161
162
  sourcecode/telemetry/transport.py,sha256=4gGHsq0WeY9VywEZXA3vUxykfiYnw9uuqfjAAec7F8o,1681
162
- sourcecode-3.1.1.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=u9yY71cBQ2ZoUpQWoG78kSFzKV7LXTTuEyGIYVd3Ppk,11286
163
- sourcecode-3.1.1.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=QccIxa26bgl1E6uMy58deGWi-0aeIkkangHcxk2kWfw,87
164
- sourcecode-3.1.1.dist-info/entry_points.txt,sha256=-JEAdChrK5We51kZcb7OaDcyil-dHBjBPL-NhuO-QY8,89
165
- sourcecode-3.1.1.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE,sha256=7DdHrU9Z_3e7dSvq4ISijZNjnuHo5NIHNiHDouMQ9JU,10491
166
- sourcecode-3.1.1.dist-info/RECORD,,
163
+ sourcecode-3.2.0.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=O9_rjaiou-XB3P9QZsqnkmS1OAKcBCiEsxJOjjN2D9A,11286
164
+ sourcecode-3.2.0.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=QccIxa26bgl1E6uMy58deGWi-0aeIkkangHcxk2kWfw,87
165
+ sourcecode-3.2.0.dist-info/entry_points.txt,sha256=-JEAdChrK5We51kZcb7OaDcyil-dHBjBPL-NhuO-QY8,89
166
+ sourcecode-3.2.0.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE,sha256=7DdHrU9Z_3e7dSvq4ISijZNjnuHo5NIHNiHDouMQ9JU,10491
167
+ sourcecode-3.2.0.dist-info/RECORD,,