sourcecode 2.5.7__py3-none-any.whl → 2.5.11__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
sourcecode/__init__.py CHANGED
@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ ASK Engine is the product. ``ask`` is the canonical CLI command; ``sourcecode``
4
4
  the legacy compatibility alias and the Python/PyPI package name. See
5
5
  docs/PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md (normative)."""
6
6
 
7
- __version__ = "2.5.7"
7
+ __version__ = "2.5.11"
@@ -5,9 +5,8 @@ from pathlib import Path
5
5
  from typing import Literal, Optional
6
6
 
7
7
  from sourcecode.reconciliation import (
8
- incoherent_layers,
9
- pattern_contradicted,
10
- unattested_layers,
8
+ reconcile_architecture_evidence,
9
+ reconcile_code_modules,
11
10
  )
12
11
 
13
12
  from sourcecode.schema import (
@@ -280,6 +279,13 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
280
279
  ) -> ArchitectureAnalysis:
281
280
  limitations: list[str] = []
282
281
  evidence: list[dict] = []
282
+ # INV-F1-4: reconciliation rules that refute a layer/pattern must not
283
+ # apply their verdict silently — a pruned layer or a rejected pattern is
284
+ # a positively-detected contradiction the reader is entitled to see, or
285
+ # "no architecture" becomes indistinguishable from "we refuted the
286
+ # architecture claim". `_detect_layers` and its helpers append the
287
+ # findings' sink-neutral detail here; drained into `limitations` below.
288
+ self._refutations: list[str] = []
283
289
 
284
290
  # Step 1: filter paths
285
291
  filtered = self._filter_paths(sm.file_paths)
@@ -482,6 +488,17 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
482
488
  "confidence": "low",
483
489
  })
484
490
 
491
+ # INV-F1-4 sink: surface every refutation that shaped the returned
492
+ # result. Prefix frames it as a refutation; the detail (unchanged) states
493
+ # the contradiction, keeping it sink-neutral (INV-F1-5). Dedup: the
494
+ # layered→modular fallthrough can refute the same directory twice.
495
+ _seen: set[str] = set()
496
+ for _detail in self._refutations:
497
+ if _detail in _seen:
498
+ continue
499
+ _seen.add(_detail)
500
+ limitations.append(f"Architecture claim refuted on evidence: {_detail}")
501
+
485
502
  return ArchitectureAnalysis(
486
503
  requested=True,
487
504
  pattern=pattern,
@@ -665,6 +682,13 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
665
682
  best_priority = -1
666
683
  best_matched: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
667
684
  best_layer_files: dict[str, set[int]] = {}
685
+ # INV-F1-4: refutations that fired while assembling each candidate. Only
686
+ # those that shaped the RETURNED result are surfaced (below): the winning
687
+ # pattern's pruned layers, or — when no classical pattern qualifies — the
688
+ # contradictions that removed the contenders. A refutation of a candidate
689
+ # that lost on score anyway is not what the reader is being misled about.
690
+ cand_refutations: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
691
+ contradiction_details: list[str] = []
668
692
 
669
693
  for pattern_name, layer_keys in LAYER_PATTERNS.items():
670
694
  matched: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
@@ -692,16 +716,29 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
692
716
  # template/asset-only layers are untouched, so a real Spring-MVC
693
717
  # `templates/` view survives.
694
718
  _layer_paths = {k: [source_paths[i] for i in v] for k, v in layer_files.items()}
695
- for _bad in incoherent_layers(pattern_name, _layer_paths, source_paths):
696
- matched.pop(_bad, None)
697
- layer_files.pop(_bad, None)
698
-
699
- # A claim that IS a runtime split must show one: JobRunr, a JVM
700
- # library, read "Fullstack with frontend, backend layers" off a
701
- # `dashboard/ui/model/` package of 16 Java files. Nothing to prune —
702
- # the pattern itself is what the evidence contradicts.
703
- if pattern_contradicted(pattern_name, _layer_paths, source_paths):
719
+ _refs: list[str] = []
720
+ _split_contradicted = False
721
+ for _f in reconcile_architecture_evidence(
722
+ pattern=pattern_name, layer_files=_layer_paths, repo_files=source_paths
723
+ ):
724
+ _refs.append(_f.detail)
725
+ if _f.rule == "composition_runtime_split":
726
+ # A claim that IS a runtime split must show one: JobRunr, a JVM
727
+ # library, read "Fullstack with frontend, backend layers" off a
728
+ # `dashboard/ui/model/` package of 16 Java files. Nothing to
729
+ # prune — the pattern itself is what the evidence contradicts.
730
+ _split_contradicted = True
731
+ else:
732
+ # layer_language_coherence: drop the layers owned by a
733
+ # different runtime; template/asset-only layers are untouched,
734
+ # so a real Spring-MVC `templates/` view survives.
735
+ for _bad in _f.symbols:
736
+ matched.pop(_bad, None)
737
+ layer_files.pop(_bad, None)
738
+ if _split_contradicted:
739
+ contradiction_details.extend(_refs)
704
740
  continue
741
+ cand_refutations[pattern_name] = _refs
705
742
 
706
743
  # A pattern with unmet required keys cannot qualify (e.g. mvc needs a view).
707
744
  required = _PATTERN_REQUIRED_KEYS.get(pattern_name)
@@ -717,6 +754,10 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
717
754
  best_layer_files = layer_files
718
755
 
719
756
  if best_score >= 2:
757
+ # The reported pattern is the one whose refutations misled the reader
758
+ # if left silent (keycloak's dropped `view` layer). Contradictions of
759
+ # OTHER, losing candidates did not shape this result — omit them.
760
+ self._refutations.extend(cand_refutations.get(best_pattern, []))
720
761
  layer_confidence: Literal["high", "medium", "low"] = "medium" if best_score >= 3 else "low"
721
762
  layers: list[ArchitectureLayer] = []
722
763
  for layer_key, matched_dirs in best_matched.items():
@@ -729,6 +770,11 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
729
770
  ))
730
771
  return best_pattern, layers
731
772
 
773
+ # No classical pattern qualified. If a contender was removed by a runtime
774
+ # split contradiction (jobrunr's "fullstack"), that is why — and the
775
+ # eventual fallthrough result would otherwise look like a silent absence.
776
+ self._refutations.extend(contradiction_details)
777
+
732
778
  # 2. Spring domain-module detection (petclinic-style: deep common prefix + feature dirs)
733
779
  spring_result = self._detect_spring_domain_modules(source_paths)
734
780
  if spring_result is not None:
@@ -872,8 +918,13 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
872
918
  # Architecture with orchestration, data layers" rested on ONE directory
873
919
  # entry plus a settings.gradle, with 47 Java files visible and ignored.
874
920
  # A logical code layer that holds no code of this repo is not one.
875
- for _bad in unattested_layers(non_empty, paths):
876
- non_empty.pop(_bad, None)
921
+ # INV-F1-4: this path only runs when no classical pattern won, so a
922
+ # pruning here directly shapes the returned result (fewer layers, or a
923
+ # drop below 2 that falls through to flat/unknown) — surface it.
924
+ for _f in reconcile_code_modules(layer_files=non_empty, repo_files=paths):
925
+ for _bad in _f.symbols:
926
+ non_empty.pop(_bad, None)
927
+ self._refutations.append(_f.detail)
877
928
  if len(non_empty) >= 2:
878
929
  return "layered", [
879
930
  ArchitectureLayer(name=k, pattern="layered", files=v, confidence="low")
@@ -904,8 +955,11 @@ class ArchitectureAnalyzer:
904
955
  # count alone let build and asset directories be reported as modules —
905
956
  # ofbiz "docker, framework, runtime, gradle", neo4j "packaging",
906
957
  # eureka "images" (five PNGs). The real modules survive untouched.
907
- for _bad in unattested_layers(meaningful, paths):
908
- meaningful.pop(_bad, None)
958
+ # INV-F1-4: same as the layered path — surface each refuted module.
959
+ for _f in reconcile_code_modules(layer_files=meaningful, repo_files=paths):
960
+ for _bad in _f.symbols:
961
+ meaningful.pop(_bad, None)
962
+ self._refutations.append(_f.detail)
909
963
  if len(meaningful) >= 2:
910
964
  return "modular", [
911
965
  ArchitectureLayer(name=k, pattern="modular", files=v, confidence="low")
sourcecode/cli.py CHANGED
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import sys
7
7
  import threading
8
8
  import time
9
9
  from pathlib import Path
10
- from typing import Any, Optional, cast
10
+ from typing import Any, NoReturn, Optional, cast
11
11
 
12
12
  import typer
13
13
 
@@ -293,6 +293,30 @@ _OPTIONS_WITH_VALUE: frozenset[str] = frozenset({
293
293
  })
294
294
 
295
295
 
296
+ def _reject_path_before_subcommand(path_token: str, subcommand: str) -> "NoReturn":
297
+ """Refuse `ask <path> <subcommand>` instead of silently scanning the CWD.
298
+
299
+ `_detected_path` is only read by the root analysis: a subcommand takes its own
300
+ `path` Argument, which defaults to the current directory. So the path token in
301
+ `ask spaghetti-api endpoints` was swallowed here and the subcommand ran against
302
+ the CWD — from a directory of checkouts that is every repository at once.
303
+ Measured: it answered with 1077 endpoints from keycloak, neo4j and eureka
304
+ instead of spaghetti-api's 7, exit code 0, no warning.
305
+
306
+ A wrong answer that looks right is the one failure this tool must not produce,
307
+ and the token order cannot be repaired by guessing: subcommands disagree about
308
+ where a path sits (`impact-chain <symbol> <path>`), so there is no slot to move
309
+ it to. Name the correct command and stop.
310
+ """
311
+ print(
312
+ f"error: path '{path_token}' comes before the '{subcommand}' subcommand, "
313
+ f"so it would be ignored and the current directory scanned instead.\n"
314
+ f" use: ask {subcommand} {path_token}",
315
+ file=sys.stderr,
316
+ )
317
+ raise SystemExit(2)
318
+
319
+
296
320
  def _preprocess_args(args: list[str]) -> list[str]:
297
321
  """Extract a repository path token from an args list and store it in _detected_path.
298
322
 
@@ -300,6 +324,8 @@ def _preprocess_args(args: list[str]) -> list[str]:
300
324
  Correctly skips option values (e.g. ``yaml`` in ``--format yaml``).
301
325
  If the first non-flag, non-value positional token is a known subcommand name,
302
326
  args are returned unchanged so Click can dispatch the subcommand.
327
+ A path token followed by a subcommand is rejected — see
328
+ ``_reject_path_before_subcommand``.
303
329
  """
304
330
  result = list(args)
305
331
  skip_next = False
@@ -315,11 +341,17 @@ def _preprocess_args(args: list[str]) -> list[str]:
315
341
  skip_next = True
316
342
  continue
317
343
  if arg in _SUBCOMMANDS:
344
+ if _path_index >= 0:
345
+ # A path already claimed a slot, so this subcommand can only be
346
+ # the wrong-order form: the path would be dropped and the CWD
347
+ # scanned in its place.
348
+ _reject_path_before_subcommand(result[_path_index], arg)
318
349
  return result # known subcommand — leave for Click to dispatch
350
+ if _path_index >= 0:
351
+ continue # a later positional is the subcommand's own business
319
352
  # First genuine positional: treat as repository path
320
353
  _set_detected_path(arg)
321
354
  _path_index = i
322
- break
323
355
  if _path_index >= 0:
324
356
  result.pop(_path_index)
325
357
  return result
@@ -374,21 +374,38 @@ def _rule_composition_runtime_split(
374
374
  ]
375
375
 
376
376
 
377
+ def reconcile_code_modules(
378
+ *, layer_files: dict[str, list[str]], repo_files: "list[str]"
379
+ ) -> list[ReconciliationFinding]:
380
+ """Run the code-module attestation rule. Never raises.
381
+
382
+ Returns the findings (name AND detail), so a consumer can both prune the
383
+ refuted layers and SURFACE why — INV-F1-4: a rule that is applied silently
384
+ replaces one dishonesty with another.
385
+
386
+ Args:
387
+ layer_files: {claimed module -> its files}.
388
+ repo_files: every source file, supplying the repo's own runtime.
389
+ """
390
+ try:
391
+ repo_runtimes = runtime_census({"_repo": list(repo_files)})["_repo"]
392
+ return _rule_layer_code_attestation(runtime_census(layer_files), repo_runtimes)
393
+ except Exception:
394
+ return []
395
+
396
+
377
397
  def unattested_layers(
378
398
  layer_files: dict[str, list[str]], repo_files: "list[str]"
379
399
  ) -> frozenset[str]:
380
400
  """Layers holding no code of the repo's runtime (convenience view).
381
401
 
382
- For consumers claiming code modules / logical code layers. Never raises.
402
+ Names only; consumers that must also surface the contradiction use
403
+ `reconcile_code_modules` instead. Never raises.
383
404
  """
384
- try:
385
- repo_runtimes = runtime_census({"_repo": list(repo_files)})["_repo"]
386
- out: set[str] = set()
387
- for f in _rule_layer_code_attestation(runtime_census(layer_files), repo_runtimes):
388
- out.update(f.symbols)
389
- return frozenset(out)
390
- except Exception:
391
- return frozenset()
405
+ out: set[str] = set()
406
+ for f in reconcile_code_modules(layer_files=layer_files, repo_files=repo_files):
407
+ out.update(f.symbols)
408
+ return frozenset(out)
392
409
 
393
410
 
394
411
  def reconcile_architecture_evidence(
sourcecode/ris.py CHANGED
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ import subprocess
29
29
  from dataclasses import asdict, dataclass
30
30
  from datetime import datetime, timezone
31
31
  from pathlib import Path
32
- from typing import Optional
32
+ from typing import Any, Optional
33
33
 
34
34
  RIS_SCHEMA_VERSION: str = "1.0"
35
35
  _RIS_FILENAME: str = "ris.json.gz"
@@ -107,9 +107,46 @@ def save_ris(repo_root: Path, ris: RepositoryIntelligenceSnapshot) -> None:
107
107
  # Data extraction from L1 core_dict
108
108
  # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
109
109
 
110
+ def _entrypoint_paths(raw: Any) -> list[str]:
111
+ """Normalize agent_view's `entry_points` to the file paths RIS promises.
112
+
113
+ `structural_map["entrypoints"]` is consumed as a list of path STRINGS (it is
114
+ sliced, and every reader guards with `isinstance(fp, str)`), but agent_view
115
+ emits that key in two different shapes under one schema_version:
116
+
117
+ {"bootstrap": [path, …], "security": […], "controllers": {counts}}
118
+ when a bootstrap/security entry point was detected (Spring, …)
119
+ [{"path": …, "kind": …}, …]
120
+ otherwise
121
+
122
+ Storing either verbatim broke BOTH readers: the dict raised `KeyError` on
123
+ `entrypoints[:10]` — swallowed by a bare `except Exception`, silently
124
+ disabling the RIS fast path on exactly the Java/Spring repos it exists for —
125
+ and the list of dicts recovered zero paths, because a dict is not a `str`.
126
+
127
+ The shape drift itself is a separate schema question; normalizing here keeps
128
+ RIS's own contract true whichever shape it is handed, including plain paths.
129
+ """
130
+ if isinstance(raw, dict):
131
+ # Only bootstrap/security carry paths; `controllers` is a count summary.
132
+ out: list[str] = []
133
+ for key in ("bootstrap", "security"):
134
+ out.extend(p for p in (raw.get(key) or []) if isinstance(p, str))
135
+ return out
136
+ if isinstance(raw, list):
137
+ out = []
138
+ for item in raw:
139
+ if isinstance(item, str):
140
+ out.append(item)
141
+ elif isinstance(item, dict) and isinstance(item.get("path"), str):
142
+ out.append(item["path"])
143
+ return out
144
+ return []
145
+
146
+
110
147
  def _extract_structural_map(agent_data: dict) -> dict:
111
148
  """Extract structural map from agent_view output."""
112
- entry_points = agent_data.get("entry_points", [])
149
+ entry_points = _entrypoint_paths(agent_data.get("entry_points", []))
113
150
 
114
151
  layers = []
115
152
  domains = []
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
2
  Name: sourcecode
3
- Version: 2.5.7
3
+ Version: 2.5.11
4
4
  Summary: Persistent structural context and ultra-fast repeated analysis for AI coding agents
5
5
  License-File: LICENSE
6
6
  Keywords: agents,ai,codebase,context,developer-tools,llm
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
- sourcecode/__init__.py,sha256=AYI3dPxhkPPbI6cutQ3CdTcxsveWkRyIzUZMCY7lfFs,308
1
+ sourcecode/__init__.py,sha256=dNBAjvpTNkiFYDXqXdJjx0saZlNREwHXUuF1drsfGuo,309
2
2
  sourcecode/adaptive_scanner.py,sha256=XffluXKzJUXrMtjEiAOnSNPZnztdIcts17T9ouHeID0,10521
3
3
  sourcecode/archetype.py,sha256=d7yoN6Tj4OBj-VgSMPEKg4WF9H8FypnZ5A6AkUh5oIE,34484
4
- sourcecode/architecture_analyzer.py,sha256=1CEIeFtuxdzeFaeUtA5QuDmFkb5eilUK8zRmk9tcDxc,55644
4
+ sourcecode/architecture_analyzer.py,sha256=Bv6OYeAdK88PvHZuryO6CkR6NLJMUqvLy9WkGsw1Fa4,59072
5
5
  sourcecode/architecture_summary.py,sha256=oBkjx7hZxmpdKLt4EracjRKHJFOGuPTd6SadTyPxY7Q,29568
6
6
  sourcecode/ast_extractor.py,sha256=FEsYTsMCXbJfSYQZRk1k-I-PjUNGnKqO1IxMftsgA5U,51351
7
7
  sourcecode/cache.py,sha256=1V3vsaODAa2UBJAC0xpvxpmRdriCezQx5Q8JCcfgziE,31892
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ sourcecode/caller_metrics.py,sha256=HG8RCOkpzzsEGdnMRob6byrwjoj5__t0TEsBj4yR7ks,
10
10
  sourcecode/canonical_ir.py,sha256=5hLAhhSpXNOdZAvPt-J-rXccJE6M3A6gVhmhU0Tym6Y,29269
11
11
  sourcecode/cir_graphs.py,sha256=9G0HHj1kw2325IDyzo2OpX73BNswEckecf4MZUXB4JM,12078
12
12
  sourcecode/classifier.py,sha256=9olDN5joeKHcwG9vf73X-t_son16hLVNib0rBbqk1vc,18865
13
- sourcecode/cli.py,sha256=46Chp0JsEWD_j0HUWOx4tOhrsXSWgWV8JhL5G8SyW4I,322078
13
+ sourcecode/cli.py,sha256=mlMgyRukRoHXYdAYHBN4z06LszwdRo0QLdhs0KYtup8,323804
14
14
  sourcecode/code_notes_analyzer.py,sha256=EJemNCNc9Dn-1RZYu-aNbK0ELzmsyC4s6FdHi3XyNEI,9392
15
15
  sourcecode/confidence_analyzer.py,sha256=KCRg8B4WH15LpOB7oYhE4dD5nou9Xi48RT3vpaO6Ar4,20868
16
16
  sourcecode/context_cache.py,sha256=maws79rLKDwyZ7c9Q2LwlIxqZHRFlaKzErtO3mglWoA,25036
@@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ sourcecode/pr_impact.py,sha256=dCDVw83EDbyVf6F9ZmEQmsFz8ruVH7d4mpeKQCIZHM0,16805
51
51
  sourcecode/prepare_context.py,sha256=PYygAKL_jwz8gGElgM9mroUSih18UKSSjv08ndfl4aA,222877
52
52
  sourcecode/progress.py,sha256=qn30sWaHOkjTgXsSBmiPkz7Rsbwc5oSlIe6JNEMYp_k,3149
53
53
  sourcecode/ranking_engine.py,sha256=ZAucq_YX2KkWUuAZf4P0lhtQ_38vEFnUhuGtSZd1S0E,12970
54
- sourcecode/reconciliation.py,sha256=Ulmo4cNgeBnS1KxWv7kKFkXkwgJaQ70P0x6zC4F0I_I,26342
54
+ sourcecode/reconciliation.py,sha256=NSGWsRQ-5l50aO_6YErDlu1kEbQB8zDtVf58h_Ro15c,26984
55
55
  sourcecode/redactor.py,sha256=SB4hwIvg8h-hvcqKcDWaZvA-aSyn-at-BIRwa0tUv5E,3227
56
56
  sourcecode/relevance_scorer.py,sha256=0AgEt4KrV73nioMqBgjhGjtY7L2C7L7cSyKtj3IKcrw,9408
57
57
  sourcecode/rename_refactor.py,sha256=h6dNFlB9aZ_3q6heeHBkgXQeXaT03nvPSsYH6P8qxFg,12965
58
58
  sourcecode/repo_classifier.py,sha256=FG1vaWKdWXsWdl-S8hjVMiTqcwgaRXkDyvK4rPcOGtQ,22681
59
59
  sourcecode/repository_ir.py,sha256=F6lRgPoP8oTtnGpRgjoLw-dlxZRXH7XOcehtcNwufEY,309550
60
- sourcecode/ris.py,sha256=aG2D4159gtpg968yD3PylYbIXhGFOwIlFBI0DSr84yY,20412
60
+ sourcecode/ris.py,sha256=Hw8TakTQ6hku-Abf2k8954NwkrH_sP73_8wVH8x5khc,22079
61
61
  sourcecode/runtime_classifier.py,sha256=uTAD6BDCiBLUZEDRfqk718kM4RTT_vAbfkcOI2_Xx58,18432
62
62
  sourcecode/scanner.py,sha256=WdOQ78mMzjR1NjmKTlbxdgwinnCTfAhxCVLBEFQiFHU,8899
63
63
  sourcecode/schema.py,sha256=aHNXDf8LGyUC8ZDE_VS9kiskC2-Oswhi_WnpdGy6HDw,24897
@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ sourcecode/telemetry/consent.py,sha256=LIAO9ohJZF8OuZwM4u1VWtALlYfTCCKq4wV3Vwc7i
137
137
  sourcecode/telemetry/events.py,sha256=LtzYfaX9Ilckj5PTvAcTpDa9mLqDsYPDUiDkRa58piY,2580
138
138
  sourcecode/telemetry/filters.py,sha256=NHa5T-6DaZduQPFuC34jOqHWQgSizM-Ygq8aZ4j19ng,5834
139
139
  sourcecode/telemetry/transport.py,sha256=4gGHsq0WeY9VywEZXA3vUxykfiYnw9uuqfjAAec7F8o,1681
140
- sourcecode-2.5.7.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=WZPw6sppRfqGy5VxcYxS97BHKScBppWAW2UI8eD_TIM,10851
141
- sourcecode-2.5.7.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=QccIxa26bgl1E6uMy58deGWi-0aeIkkangHcxk2kWfw,87
142
- sourcecode-2.5.7.dist-info/entry_points.txt,sha256=-JEAdChrK5We51kZcb7OaDcyil-dHBjBPL-NhuO-QY8,89
143
- sourcecode-2.5.7.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE,sha256=7DdHrU9Z_3e7dSvq4ISijZNjnuHo5NIHNiHDouMQ9JU,10491
144
- sourcecode-2.5.7.dist-info/RECORD,,
140
+ sourcecode-2.5.11.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=6j_zA5-pJ01V4qnmyhPDb3FtyvH5bqAccNhHVP6tO5s,10852
141
+ sourcecode-2.5.11.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=QccIxa26bgl1E6uMy58deGWi-0aeIkkangHcxk2kWfw,87
142
+ sourcecode-2.5.11.dist-info/entry_points.txt,sha256=-JEAdChrK5We51kZcb7OaDcyil-dHBjBPL-NhuO-QY8,89
143
+ sourcecode-2.5.11.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE,sha256=7DdHrU9Z_3e7dSvq4ISijZNjnuHo5NIHNiHDouMQ9JU,10491
144
+ sourcecode-2.5.11.dist-info/RECORD,,