regscale-cli 6.20.4.1__py3-none-any.whl → 6.20.5.0__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Potentially problematic release.


This version of regscale-cli might be problematic. Click here for more details.

Files changed (33) hide show
  1. regscale/__init__.py +1 -1
  2. regscale/core/app/internal/model_editor.py +3 -3
  3. regscale/core/app/utils/regscale_utils.py +37 -0
  4. regscale/core/utils/date.py +26 -3
  5. regscale/integrations/commercial/defender.py +3 -0
  6. regscale/integrations/commercial/qualys/__init__.py +40 -14
  7. regscale/integrations/commercial/qualys/containers.py +324 -0
  8. regscale/integrations/commercial/qualys/scanner.py +203 -8
  9. regscale/integrations/commercial/synqly/edr.py +10 -0
  10. regscale/integrations/commercial/wizv2/click.py +2 -2
  11. regscale/integrations/commercial/wizv2/constants.py +13 -0
  12. regscale/integrations/commercial/wizv2/issue.py +3 -2
  13. regscale/integrations/commercial/wizv2/scanner.py +5 -1
  14. regscale/integrations/commercial/wizv2/utils.py +118 -72
  15. regscale/integrations/public/fedramp/fedramp_cis_crm.py +98 -20
  16. regscale/models/integration_models/cisa_kev_data.json +140 -3
  17. regscale/models/integration_models/synqly_models/capabilities.json +1 -1
  18. regscale/models/regscale_models/catalog.py +16 -0
  19. regscale/models/regscale_models/file.py +2 -1
  20. regscale/models/regscale_models/form_field_value.py +59 -1
  21. regscale/models/regscale_models/issue.py +47 -0
  22. regscale/models/regscale_models/organization.py +30 -0
  23. regscale/models/regscale_models/regscale_model.py +13 -5
  24. regscale/models/regscale_models/security_control.py +47 -0
  25. regscale/models/regscale_models/security_plan.py +32 -0
  26. {regscale_cli-6.20.4.1.dist-info → regscale_cli-6.20.5.0.dist-info}/METADATA +1 -1
  27. {regscale_cli-6.20.4.1.dist-info → regscale_cli-6.20.5.0.dist-info}/RECORD +33 -31
  28. tests/fixtures/test_fixture.py +33 -4
  29. tests/regscale/core/test_app.py +53 -32
  30. {regscale_cli-6.20.4.1.dist-info → regscale_cli-6.20.5.0.dist-info}/LICENSE +0 -0
  31. {regscale_cli-6.20.4.1.dist-info → regscale_cli-6.20.5.0.dist-info}/WHEEL +0 -0
  32. {regscale_cli-6.20.4.1.dist-info → regscale_cli-6.20.5.0.dist-info}/entry_points.txt +0 -0
  33. {regscale_cli-6.20.4.1.dist-info → regscale_cli-6.20.5.0.dist-info}/top_level.txt +0 -0
@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ from __future__ import annotations
7
7
  import json
8
8
  import math
9
9
  import re
10
+ import shutil
11
+ import tempfile
10
12
  from collections import Counter
11
13
  from concurrent.futures import as_completed
12
14
  from concurrent.futures.thread import ThreadPoolExecutor
15
+ from datetime import datetime
16
+ from pathlib import Path
13
17
  from threading import Thread
14
18
  from types import ModuleType
15
19
  from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Dict, List, Literal, Optional, Tuple, TypeVar
@@ -18,7 +22,7 @@ import click
18
22
 
19
23
  from regscale.core.app.api import Api
20
24
  from regscale.core.app.utils.api_handler import APIInsertionError, APIUpdateError
21
- from regscale.core.app.utils.app_utils import create_progress_object, error_and_exit, get_current_datetime
25
+ from regscale.core.app.utils.app_utils import compute_hash, create_progress_object, error_and_exit, get_current_datetime
22
26
  from regscale.core.utils.graphql import GraphQLQuery
23
27
  from regscale.integrations.public.fedramp.parts_mapper import PartMapper
24
28
  from regscale.integrations.public.fedramp.ssp_logger import SSPLogger
@@ -229,19 +233,17 @@ def map_implementation_status(control_id: str, cis_data: dict) -> str:
229
233
  status = next(iter(status_counts))
230
234
  return STATUS_MAPPING.get(status, ControlImplementationStatus.NotImplemented)
231
235
 
232
- # Priority-based status determination
233
- if any(status in ["N/A", ALTERNATIVE_IMPLEMENTATION] for status in status_counts):
234
- status_ret = ControlImplementationStatus.NA
235
-
236
236
  implemented_count = status_counts.get("Implemented", 0)
237
237
  total_count = sum(status_counts.values())
238
238
 
239
239
  if implemented_count == total_count:
240
- status_ret = ControlImplementationStatus.FullyImplemented
240
+ return ControlImplementationStatus.FullyImplemented
241
241
  elif implemented_count > 0 or any(status == "Partially Implemented" for status in status_counts):
242
242
  status_ret = ControlImplementationStatus.PartiallyImplemented
243
243
  elif any(status == "Planned" for status in status_counts):
244
244
  status_ret = ControlImplementationStatus.Planned
245
+ elif any(status in ["N/A", ALTERNATIVE_IMPLEMENTATION] for status in status_counts):
246
+ status_ret = ControlImplementationStatus.NA
245
247
 
246
248
  return status_ret
247
249
 
@@ -271,7 +273,9 @@ def map_origination(control_id: str, cis_data: dict) -> dict:
271
273
 
272
274
  # Find matching CIS records
273
275
  matching_records = [
274
- record for record in cis_data.values() if gen_key(record["regscale_control_id"]).lower() == control_id.lower()
276
+ record
277
+ for record in cis_data.values()
278
+ if record.get("regscale_control_id") and gen_key(record["regscale_control_id"]).lower() == control_id.lower()
275
279
  ]
276
280
 
277
281
  # Process each matching record
@@ -421,6 +425,7 @@ def update_imp_objective(
421
425
  ex_obj = next((obj for obj in existing_imp_obj if obj.objectiveId == objective.id), None)
422
426
  if ex_obj:
423
427
  ex_obj.status = get_multi_status(cis_record)
428
+ ex_obj.responsibility = responsibility
424
429
  if cloud_responsibility.strip():
425
430
  logger.debug(
426
431
  f"Updating Implementation Objective #{ex_obj.id} with responsibility: {responsibility}"
@@ -796,6 +801,12 @@ def process_single_record(**kwargs) -> Tuple[List[str], Optional[ImplementationO
796
801
  :rtype Tuple[List[str], Optional[ImplementationObjective]]
797
802
  :returns A list of errors and the Implementation Objective if successful, otherwise None
798
803
  """
804
+ # for pytest
805
+ if not part_mapper_rev5.data:
806
+ part_mapper_rev5.load_fedramp_version_5_mapping()
807
+ if not part_mapper_rev4.data:
808
+ part_mapper_rev4.load_fedramp_version_4_mapping()
809
+
799
810
  errors = []
800
811
  version = kwargs.get("version")
801
812
  leveraged_auth_id: int = kwargs.get("leveraged_auth_id")
@@ -879,6 +890,9 @@ def parse_crm_worksheet(file_path: click.Path, crm_sheet_name: str, version: Lit
879
890
  warn_extra_headers=False,
880
891
  )
881
892
 
893
+ if validator.data.empty:
894
+ return {}
895
+
882
896
  # find index of row where the first column == Control ID
883
897
  skip_rows = determine_skip_row(original_df=validator.data, text_to_find=CONTROL_ID, original_skip=skip_rows)
884
898
 
@@ -942,15 +956,18 @@ def parse_crm_worksheet(file_path: click.Path, crm_sheet_name: str, version: Lit
942
956
  clean_control_id = re.sub(r"\W+", "", control_id)
943
957
  clean_control_id = re.sub("([a-z0-9])([A-Z])", r"\1_\2", clean_control_id).lower()
944
958
 
959
+ # Handle NaN values for the specific inheritance field
960
+ inheritance_field = row["Specific Inheritance and Customer Agency/CSP Responsibilities"]
961
+ if get_pandas().isna(inheritance_field):
962
+ inheritance_field = ""
963
+
945
964
  # Use clean_control_id as the key to avoid overwriting
946
965
  formatted_crm[control_id] = {
947
966
  "control_id": control_id,
948
967
  "clean_control_id": clean_control_id,
949
968
  "regscale_control_id": transform_control(control_id),
950
969
  "can_be_inherited_from_csp": row[CAN_BE_INHERITED_CSP],
951
- "specific_inheritance_and_customer_agency_csp_responsibilities": row[
952
- "Specific Inheritance and Customer Agency/CSP Responsibilities"
953
- ],
970
+ "specific_inheritance_and_customer_agency_csp_responsibilities": inheritance_field,
954
971
  }
955
972
 
956
973
  return formatted_crm
@@ -979,6 +996,9 @@ def parse_cis_worksheet(file_path: click.Path, cis_sheet_name: str) -> dict:
979
996
  worksheet_name=cis_sheet_name,
980
997
  warn_extra_headers=False,
981
998
  )
999
+ if validator.data.empty:
1000
+ return {}
1001
+
982
1002
  skip_rows = determine_skip_row(original_df=validator.data, text_to_find=CONTROL_ID, original_skip=skip_rows)
983
1003
 
984
1004
  # Parse the worksheet named 'CIS GovCloud U.S.+DoD (H)', skipping the initial rows
@@ -1128,14 +1148,14 @@ def _drop_rows_nan(instructions_df: "pd.DataFrame") -> "pd.DataFrame":
1128
1148
 
1129
1149
 
1130
1150
  def parse_instructions_worksheet(
1131
- df: "pd.DataFrame",
1151
+ df: Dict[str, "pd.DataFrame"],
1132
1152
  version: Literal["rev4", "rev5"],
1133
1153
  instructions_sheet_name: str = "Instructions",
1134
1154
  ) -> list[dict]:
1135
1155
  """
1136
1156
  Function to parse the instructions sheet from the FedRAMP Rev5 CIS/CRM workbook
1137
1157
 
1138
- :param pd.DataFrame df: The dataframe to parse
1158
+ :param Dict[str, "pd.DataFrame"] df: The dataframe to parse
1139
1159
  :param Literal["rev4", "rev5"] version: The version of the FedRAMP CIS CRM workbook
1140
1160
  :param str instructions_sheet_name: The name of the instructions sheet to parse, defaults to "Instructions"
1141
1161
  :return: List of formatted instructions content as a dictionary
@@ -1143,6 +1163,8 @@ def parse_instructions_worksheet(
1143
1163
  """
1144
1164
  pd = get_pandas()
1145
1165
  df = df[instructions_sheet_name].iloc[2:]
1166
+ if len(df) == 0:
1167
+ return []
1146
1168
  instructions_df = df.dropna(axis=1, how="all")
1147
1169
 
1148
1170
  if version == "rev5":
@@ -1356,6 +1378,25 @@ def build_implementations_dict(security_plan_id) -> None:
1356
1378
  logger.debug("Built %s implementations", len(imps))
1357
1379
 
1358
1380
 
1381
+ def create_backup_file(security_plan_id: int):
1382
+ """
1383
+ Create a backup file for the given security plan ID.
1384
+
1385
+ :param int security_plan_id: The security plan ID
1386
+ """
1387
+ logger.info("Creating a CIS/CRM Backup file of the current SSP state ..")
1388
+ # Export CIS/CRM to file system, and save to artifacts folder
1389
+ res = SecurityPlan.export_cis_crm(security_plan_id)
1390
+ status = res.get("status")
1391
+ if status and status == "complete":
1392
+ file_name = res.get("trustedDisplayName")
1393
+ logger.info(f"A CIS/CRM Backup file saved to SSP# {security_plan_id} file subsystem as {file_name}!")
1394
+ return
1395
+ continue_anyway = click.prompt("Unable to create a backup file. Would you like to continue?", type=bool)
1396
+ if not continue_anyway:
1397
+ error_and_exit("Backup file creation failed.")
1398
+
1399
+
1359
1400
  def create_new_security_plan(profile_id: int, system_name: str):
1360
1401
  """
1361
1402
  Create a new FedRamp security plan and map controls based on the profile id.
@@ -1425,6 +1466,7 @@ def create_new_security_plan(profile_id: int, system_name: str):
1425
1466
  INITIAL_IMPORT = False
1426
1467
  ret = next((plan for plan in existing_plan), None)
1427
1468
  logger.info(f"Found existing SSP# {ret.id}")
1469
+ create_backup_file(ret.id)
1428
1470
  existing_imps = ControlImplementation.get_list_by_plan(ret.id)
1429
1471
  for imp in existing_imps:
1430
1472
  EXISTING_IMPLEMENTATIONS[imp.controlID] = imp
@@ -1503,6 +1545,43 @@ def _check_sheet_names_exist(
1503
1545
  return df
1504
1546
 
1505
1547
 
1548
+ def copy_and_rename_file(file_path: Path, new_name: str) -> Path:
1549
+ """
1550
+ Copy and rename a file.
1551
+ """
1552
+ temp_folder = Path(tempfile.gettempdir()) / "regscale"
1553
+ temp_folder.mkdir(exist_ok=True) # Ensure directory exists
1554
+
1555
+ new_file_path = temp_folder / new_name
1556
+ shutil.copy(file_path, new_file_path)
1557
+ return new_file_path
1558
+
1559
+
1560
+ def upload_file(file_path: Path, ssp_id: int, parent_module: str, api: Api) -> None:
1561
+ """
1562
+ Upload a file to RegScale
1563
+
1564
+ :param Path file_path: The path to the file to upload
1565
+ :param int ssp_id: The ID of the SSP to upload the file to
1566
+ :param str parent_module: The module to upload the file to
1567
+ :param Api api: The API object to use to upload the file
1568
+ :rtype: None
1569
+ """
1570
+ file_hash = None
1571
+ with open(file_path, "rb") as f:
1572
+ file_hash = compute_hash(f)
1573
+ existing_files = File.get_files_for_parent_from_regscale(ssp_id, parent_module)
1574
+ identical_file = next((file for file in existing_files if file.shaHash == file_hash), None)
1575
+ if file_hash and identical_file:
1576
+ logger.info(
1577
+ f"An identical file {identical_file.trustedDisplayName} already exists in RegScale, skipping upload."
1578
+ )
1579
+ return
1580
+ File.upload_file_to_regscale(
1581
+ file_name=file_path.absolute(), parent_id=ssp_id, parent_module=parent_module, api=api, tags="cis-crm"
1582
+ )
1583
+
1584
+
1506
1585
  def parse_and_import_ciscrm(
1507
1586
  file_path: click.Path,
1508
1587
  version: Literal["rev4", "rev5", "4", "5"],
@@ -1595,11 +1674,10 @@ def parse_and_import_ciscrm(
1595
1674
  crm_data=crm_data,
1596
1675
  version=version, # type: ignore
1597
1676
  )
1598
-
1599
- # upload workbook to the SSP
1600
- File.upload_file_to_regscale(
1601
- file_name=str(file_path),
1602
- parent_id=ssp.id,
1603
- parent_module="securityplans",
1604
- api=api,
1605
- )
1677
+ file_path = Path(file_path)
1678
+ file_name = f"{file_path.stem}_update_{datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d')}{file_path.suffix}"
1679
+ if INITIAL_IMPORT:
1680
+ file_name = f"{file_path.stem}_initial_import{file_path.suffix}"
1681
+ # upload workbook to the SSP
1682
+ file_path = copy_and_rename_file(file_path, file_name)
1683
+ upload_file(file_path, ssp.id, "securityplans", api)
@@ -1,9 +1,146 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "title": "CISA Catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities",
3
- "catalogVersion": "2025.06.25",
4
- "dateReleased": "2025-06-25T16:52:26.9744Z",
5
- "count": 1370,
3
+ "catalogVersion": "2025.07.10",
4
+ "dateReleased": "2025-07-10T16:05:09.522Z",
5
+ "count": 1379,
6
6
  "vulnerabilities": [
7
+ {
8
+ "cveID": "CVE-2025-5777",
9
+ "vendorProject": "Citrix",
10
+ "product": "NetScaler ADC and Gateway",
11
+ "vulnerabilityName": "Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway Out-of-Bounds Read Vulnerability",
12
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-10",
13
+ "shortDescription": "Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability due to insufficient input validation. This vulnerability can lead to memory overread when the NetScaler is configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server.",
14
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
15
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-11",
16
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
17
+ "notes": "https:\/\/support.citrix.com\/support-home\/kbsearch\/article?articleNumber=CTX693420 ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2025-5777",
18
+ "cwes": [
19
+ "CWE-125"
20
+ ]
21
+ },
22
+ {
23
+ "cveID": "CVE-2019-9621",
24
+ "vendorProject": "Synacor",
25
+ "product": "Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)",
26
+ "vulnerabilityName": "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability",
27
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-07",
28
+ "shortDescription": "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the ProxyServlet component.",
29
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
30
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-28",
31
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
32
+ "notes": "https:\/\/wiki.zimbra.com\/wiki\/Zimbra_Security_Advisories ; https:\/\/wiki.zimbra.com\/wiki\/Security_Center ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2019-9621",
33
+ "cwes": [
34
+ "CWE-918",
35
+ "CWE-807"
36
+ ]
37
+ },
38
+ {
39
+ "cveID": "CVE-2019-5418",
40
+ "vendorProject": "Rails",
41
+ "product": "Ruby on Rails",
42
+ "vulnerabilityName": "Rails Ruby on Rails Path Traversal Vulnerability",
43
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-07",
44
+ "shortDescription": "Rails Ruby on Rails contains a path traversal vulnerability in Action View. Specially crafted accept headers in combination with calls to `render file:` can cause arbitrary files on the target server to be rendered, disclosing the file contents.",
45
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
46
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-28",
47
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
48
+ "notes": "https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20190313201629\/https:\/\/weblog.rubyonrails.org\/2019\/3\/13\/Rails-4-2-5-1-5-1-6-2-have-been-released\/ ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2019-5418",
49
+ "cwes": [
50
+ "CWE-22"
51
+ ]
52
+ },
53
+ {
54
+ "cveID": "CVE-2016-10033",
55
+ "vendorProject": "PHP",
56
+ "product": "PHPMailer",
57
+ "vulnerabilityName": "PHPMailer Command Injection Vulnerability",
58
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-07",
59
+ "shortDescription": "PHPMailer contains a command injection vulnerability because it fails to sanitize user-supplied input. Specifically, this issue affects the 'mail()' function of 'class.phpmailer.php' script. An attacker can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application. Failed exploit attempts will result in a denial-of-service condition.",
60
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
61
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-28",
62
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
63
+ "notes": "This vulnerability could affect an open-source component, third-party library, protocol, or proprietary implementation that could be used by different products. For more information, please see: https:\/\/github.com\/PHPMailer\/PHPMailer\/releases\/tag\/v5.2.18 ; https:\/\/github.com\/advisories\/GHSA-5f37-gxvh-23v6 ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2016-10033",
64
+ "cwes": [
65
+ "CWE-77",
66
+ "CWE-88"
67
+ ]
68
+ },
69
+ {
70
+ "cveID": "CVE-2014-3931",
71
+ "vendorProject": "Looking Glass",
72
+ "product": "Multi-Router Looking Glass (MRLG)",
73
+ "vulnerabilityName": "Multi-Router Looking Glass (MRLG) Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
74
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-07",
75
+ "shortDescription": "Multi-Router Looking Glass (MRLG) contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to cause an arbitrary memory write and memory corruption.",
76
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
77
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-28",
78
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
79
+ "notes": "https:\/\/mrlg.op-sec.us\/ ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2014-3931",
80
+ "cwes": [
81
+ "CWE-119"
82
+ ]
83
+ },
84
+ {
85
+ "cveID": "CVE-2025-6554",
86
+ "vendorProject": "Google",
87
+ "product": "Chromium V8",
88
+ "vulnerabilityName": "Google Chromium V8 Type Confusion Vulnerability",
89
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-02",
90
+ "shortDescription": "Google Chromium V8 contains a type confusion vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to perform arbitrary read\/write via a crafted HTML page. This vulnerability could affect multiple web browsers that utilize Chromium, including, but not limited to, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Opera.",
91
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
92
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-23",
93
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
94
+ "notes": "https:\/\/chromereleases.googleblog.com\/2025\/06\/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_30.html?m=1 ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2025-6554",
95
+ "cwes": [
96
+ "CWE-843"
97
+ ]
98
+ },
99
+ {
100
+ "cveID": "CVE-2025-48928",
101
+ "vendorProject": "TeleMessage",
102
+ "product": "TM SGNL",
103
+ "vulnerabilityName": "TeleMessage TM SGNL Exposure of Core Dump File to an Unauthorized Control Sphere Vulnerability",
104
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-01",
105
+ "shortDescription": "TeleMessage TM SGNL contains an exposure of core dump file to an unauthorized control sphere Vulnerability. This vulnerability is based on a JSP application in which the heap content is roughly equivalent to a \"core dump\" in which a password previously sent over HTTP would be included in this dump.",
106
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
107
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-22",
108
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
109
+ "notes": "It is recommended that mitigations be applied per vendor instructions if available. If these instructions cannot be located or if mitigations are unavailable, discontinue use of the product. ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2025-48928",
110
+ "cwes": [
111
+ "CWE-528"
112
+ ]
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "cveID": "CVE-2025-48927",
116
+ "vendorProject": "TeleMessage",
117
+ "product": "TM SGNL",
118
+ "vulnerabilityName": "TeleMessage TM SGNL Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default Vulnerability",
119
+ "dateAdded": "2025-07-01",
120
+ "shortDescription": "TeleMessage TM SGNL contains an initialization of a resource with an insecure default vulnerability. This vulnerability relies on how the Spring Boot Actuator is configured with an exposed heap dump endpoint at a \/heapdump URI.",
121
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
122
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-22",
123
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
124
+ "notes": "It is recommended that mitigations be applied per vendor instructions if available. If these instructions cannot be located or if mitigations are unavailable, discontinue use of the product. ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2025-48927",
125
+ "cwes": [
126
+ "CWE-1188"
127
+ ]
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "cveID": "CVE-2025-6543",
131
+ "vendorProject": "Citrix",
132
+ "product": "NetScaler ADC and Gateway",
133
+ "vulnerabilityName": "Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
134
+ "dateAdded": "2025-06-30",
135
+ "shortDescription": "Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway contain a buffer overflow vulnerability leading to unintended control flow and Denial of Service. NetScaler must be configured as Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server.",
136
+ "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
137
+ "dueDate": "2025-07-21",
138
+ "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
139
+ "notes": "https:\/\/support.citrix.com\/support-home\/kbsearch\/article?articleNumber=CTX694788 ; https:\/\/www.netscaler.com\/blog\/news\/netscaler-critical-security-updates-for-cve-2025-6543-and-cve-2025-5777\/ ; https:\/\/nvd.nist.gov\/vuln\/detail\/CVE-2025-6543",
140
+ "cwes": [
141
+ "CWE-119"
142
+ ]
143
+ },
7
144
  {
8
145
  "cveID": "CVE-2019-6693",
9
146
  "vendorProject": "Fortinet",