pystylometry 1.0.0__py3-none-any.whl → 1.3.0__py3-none-any.whl

pystylometry/consistency/drift.py

@@ -0,0 +1,549 @@
+"""Kilgarriff chi-squared drift detection for intra-document stylistic analysis.
+
+This module implements drift detection within a single document by applying
+Kilgarriff's chi-squared method to sequential chunks of text. It enables
+detection of stylistic inconsistencies, AI-generated content signatures,
+multi-author documents, and pasted/edited content.
+
+Related GitHub Issues:
+    #36 - Kilgarriff Chi-Squared drift detection for intra-document analysis
+    https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/36
+    #31 - Classical Stylometric Methods from Programming Historian
+    https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/31
+    #27 - Native chunked analysis with Distribution dataclass
+    https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/27
+
+Core Concept:
+    By comparing sequential chunks of a single document, we can measure
+    **internal stylistic consistency**. Human writing typically shows natural
+    variation in chi-squared scores between chunks. AI-generated text often
+    shows either suspicious uniformity or periodic resets.
+
+Pattern Signatures:
+    The function classifies detected patterns into named categories:
+
+    - consistent: Low, stable χ² across pairs
+        → Natural human writing with normal variation
+        → Well-edited, single-author text
+
+    - gradual_drift: Slowly increasing χ² trend
+        → Author fatigue (style degrades over time)
+        → Topic evolution affecting vocabulary
+        → Editing that becomes progressively heavier
+
+    - sudden_spike: One or more pairs have abnormally high χ²
+        → Pasted content from different source
+        → Different author wrote a section
+        → Heavy editing in one region
+
+    - suspiciously_uniform: Near-zero variance in χ² scores
+        → Possible AI generation (too consistent)
+        → Text generated in single session without revision
+        → Copy-pasted repetitive content
+
+    - unknown: Insufficient data for classification
+        → Text too short (fewer than MIN_WINDOWS chunks)
+
+Sliding Window Support:
+    The function supports overlapping windows via the `stride` parameter:
+    - stride == window_size: Non-overlapping chunks (original behavior)
+    - stride < window_size: Overlapping windows (smoother drift curve)
+    - stride > window_size: Gaps between windows (sparse sampling)
+
+    50% overlap (stride = window_size / 2) is recommended for smooth detection.
+
+Marketing Name: "Style Drift Detector" / "Consistency Fingerprint"
+
+References:
+    Kilgarriff, Adam. "Comparing Corpora." International Journal of Corpus
+        Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 1, 2001, pp. 97-133.
+        doi: 10.1075/ijcl.6.1.05kil
+
+    Eder, Maciej. "Does Size Matter? Authorship Attribution, Small Samples,
+        Big Problem." Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 30, no. 2,
+        2015, pp. 167-182.
+
+    Juola, Patrick. "Authorship Attribution." Foundations and Trends in
+        Information Retrieval, vol. 1, no. 3, 2006, pp. 233-334.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import statistics
+from typing import Any
+
+from .._types import KilgarriffDriftResult
+from .._utils import tokenize
+from ..authorship.kilgarriff import _kilgarriff_core
+from ._thresholds import (
+    CONFIDENCE_MIN_WINDOWS,
+    MARGINAL_DATA_MAX_CONFIDENCE,
+    MIN_WINDOWS,
+    RECOMMENDED_WINDOWS,
+    SPIKE_MIN_ABSOLUTE,
+    SPIKE_RATIO,
+    TREND_R_SQUARED_THRESHOLD,
+    TREND_SLOPE_THRESHOLD,
+    UNIFORM_CV_THRESHOLD,
+    UNIFORM_MEAN_THRESHOLD,
+    get_all_thresholds,
+)
+
+
+def _create_sliding_windows(
+    tokens: list[str],
+    window_size: int,
+    stride: int,
+) -> list[list[str]]:
+    """
+    Create sliding windows over a token list.
+
+    This function implements the sliding window mechanism for drift detection.
+    Windows can overlap (stride < window_size), be non-overlapping
+    (stride == window_size), or have gaps (stride > window_size).
+
+    Related GitHub Issue:
+        #36 - Sliding window support for drift detection
+        https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/36
+
+    Args:
+        tokens: List of tokens to window over
+        window_size: Number of tokens per window
+        stride: Number of tokens to advance between windows
+
+    Returns:
+        List of token lists, each representing one window
+
+    Example:
+        >>> tokens = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h"]
+        >>> windows = _create_sliding_windows(tokens, window_size=4, stride=2)
+        >>> # windows[0] = ["a", "b", "c", "d"]
+        >>> # windows[1] = ["c", "d", "e", "f"]
+        >>> # windows[2] = ["e", "f", "g", "h"]
+    """
+    if stride <= 0:
+        raise ValueError(f"stride must be positive, got {stride}")
+    if window_size <= 0:
+        raise ValueError(f"window_size must be positive, got {window_size}")
+
+    windows = []
+    start = 0
+
+    while start + window_size <= len(tokens):
+        window = tokens[start : start + window_size]
+        windows.append(window)
+        start += stride
+
+    # Handle final partial window if text doesn't divide evenly
+    # Only include if it has at least 50% of window_size tokens
+    if start < len(tokens):
+        final_window = tokens[start:]
+        if len(final_window) >= window_size * 0.5:
+            windows.append(final_window)
+
+    return windows
+
+
+def _compute_trend(values: list[float]) -> tuple[float, float]:
+    """
+    Compute linear regression slope and R-squared for trend detection.
+
+    Uses simple linear regression to detect whether chi-squared values
+    are increasing or decreasing over the document.
+
+    Related GitHub Issue:
+        #36 - Gradual drift pattern detection
+        https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/36
+
+    Args:
+        values: List of chi-squared values in order
+
+    Returns:
+        Tuple of (slope, r_squared)
+        - slope: Chi-squared units per comparison (positive = increasing)
+        - r_squared: Coefficient of determination (0-1, higher = better fit)
+
+    Example:
+        >>> values = [10.0, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0]  # Linear increase
+        >>> slope, r_sq = _compute_trend(values)
+        >>> # slope ≈ 5.0, r_sq ≈ 1.0
+    """
+    if len(values) < 2:
+        return 0.0, 0.0
+
+    n = len(values)
+    x = list(range(n))  # 0, 1, 2, ...
+
+    # Means
+    mean_x = sum(x) / n
+    mean_y = sum(values) / n
+
+    # Covariance and variance
+    cov_xy = sum((xi - mean_x) * (yi - mean_y) for xi, yi in zip(x, values))
+    var_x = sum((xi - mean_x) ** 2 for xi in x)
+    var_y = sum((yi - mean_y) ** 2 for yi in values)
+
+    # Slope
+    if var_x == 0:
+        return 0.0, 0.0
+    slope = cov_xy / var_x
+
+    # R-squared
+    if var_y == 0:
+        r_squared = 1.0 if slope == 0 else 0.0
+    else:
+        # R² = (explained variance) / (total variance)
+        ss_res = sum((yi - (mean_y + slope * (xi - mean_x))) ** 2 for xi, yi in zip(x, values))
+        ss_tot = var_y * n
+        r_squared = 1 - (ss_res / ss_tot) if ss_tot > 0 else 0.0
+
+    return slope, max(0.0, min(1.0, r_squared))
+
+
+def _classify_pattern(
+    mean_chi: float,
+    std_chi: float,
+    max_chi: float,
+    min_chi: float,
+    trend_slope: float,
+    trend_r_squared: float,
+    window_count: int,
+) -> tuple[str, float]:
+    """
+    Classify the detected pattern and compute confidence score.
+
+    This function implements the pattern classification logic described in
+    _thresholds.py. It uses a decision tree approach, checking for each
+    pattern in order of specificity.
+
+    Related GitHub Issue:
+        #36 - Pattern classification for drift detection
+        https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/36
+
+    Decision Order:
+        1. Suspiciously uniform (near-zero variance)
+        2. Sudden spike (outlier max value)
+        3. Gradual drift (significant trend)
+        4. Consistent (default)
+
+    Args:
+        mean_chi: Mean chi-squared across comparisons
+        std_chi: Standard deviation of chi-squared values
+        max_chi: Maximum chi-squared value
+        min_chi: Minimum chi-squared value
+        trend_slope: Linear regression slope
+        trend_r_squared: R-squared of trend fit
+        window_count: Number of windows analyzed
+
+    Returns:
+        Tuple of (pattern_name, confidence)
+        - pattern_name: One of "consistent", "gradual_drift", "sudden_spike",
+                        "suspiciously_uniform", "unknown"
+        - confidence: 0.0-1.0 confidence in the classification
+
+    Note:
+        Confidence is scaled down for marginal data (few windows).
+    """
+    # Base confidence scales with window count
+    if window_count < MIN_WINDOWS:
+        return "unknown", 0.0
+
+    base_confidence = min(1.0, window_count / CONFIDENCE_MIN_WINDOWS)
+    if window_count < RECOMMENDED_WINDOWS:
+        base_confidence = min(base_confidence, MARGINAL_DATA_MAX_CONFIDENCE)
+
+    # Handle edge case of zero mean
+    if mean_chi == 0:
+        return "consistent", base_confidence
+
+    # Coefficient of variation
+    cv = std_chi / mean_chi if mean_chi > 0 else 0.0
+
+    # 1. Check for suspiciously uniform (AI signature)
+    # Very low variance with low mean suggests artificial consistency
+    if cv < UNIFORM_CV_THRESHOLD and mean_chi < UNIFORM_MEAN_THRESHOLD:
+        # Confidence increases as CV decreases
+        uniformity_strength = 1 - (cv / UNIFORM_CV_THRESHOLD)
+        confidence = base_confidence * (0.6 + 0.4 * uniformity_strength)
+        return "suspiciously_uniform", confidence
+
+    # 2. Check for sudden spike (discontinuity)
+    # Max significantly exceeds mean, indicating an outlier
+    spike_ratio = max_chi / mean_chi if mean_chi > 0 else 0.0
+    if spike_ratio > SPIKE_RATIO and max_chi > SPIKE_MIN_ABSOLUTE:
+        # Confidence based on how extreme the spike is
+        spike_strength = min(1.0, (spike_ratio - SPIKE_RATIO) / SPIKE_RATIO)
+        confidence = base_confidence * (0.7 + 0.3 * spike_strength)
+        return "sudden_spike", confidence
+
+    # 3. Check for gradual drift (trend)
+    # Significant slope with reasonable R-squared
+    if abs(trend_slope) > TREND_SLOPE_THRESHOLD and trend_r_squared > TREND_R_SQUARED_THRESHOLD:
+        # Confidence based on R-squared (how well trend explains variance)
+        confidence = base_confidence * (0.5 + 0.5 * trend_r_squared)
+        return "gradual_drift", confidence
+
+    # 4. Default: consistent (natural human variation)
+    # Moderate variance, no extreme patterns
+    confidence = base_confidence * 0.8  # Slightly lower confidence for "normal"
+    return "consistent", confidence
+
+
+def compute_kilgarriff_drift(
+    text: str,
+    window_size: int = 1000,
+    stride: int = 500,
+    comparison_mode: str = "sequential",
+    lag: int = 1,
+    n_words: int = 500,
+) -> KilgarriffDriftResult:
+    """
+    Detect stylistic drift within a single document using Kilgarriff's chi-squared.
+
+    This function chunks a single text and computes chi-squared distances between
+    sequential (or all) chunk pairs to measure internal stylistic consistency.
+    It classifies the detected pattern and returns detailed metrics for analysis.
+
+    Related GitHub Issues:
+        #36 - Kilgarriff Chi-Squared drift detection for intra-document analysis
+        https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/36
+        #31 - Classical Stylometric Methods from Programming Historian
+        https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/31
+
+    Marketing Name: "Style Drift Detector" / "Consistency Fingerprint"
+
+    Pattern Signatures:
+        - consistent: Low, stable χ² across pairs (natural human writing)
+        - gradual_drift: Slowly increasing trend (author fatigue, topic shift)
+        - sudden_spike: One pair has high χ² (pasted content, different author)
+        - suspiciously_uniform: Near-zero variance (possible AI generation)
+
+    Algorithm:
+        1. Tokenize text and create sliding windows
+        2. For each window pair (based on comparison_mode):
+           a. Compute chi-squared using Kilgarriff's method
+           b. Record contributing words
+        3. Compute holistic metrics (mean, std, max, trend)
+        4. Classify pattern based on thresholds
+        5. Return detailed result with all metrics
+
+    References:
+        Kilgarriff, Adam. "Comparing Corpora." International Journal of Corpus
+            Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 1, 2001, pp. 97-133.
+
+    Args:
+        text: Input text to analyze for stylistic drift
+        window_size: Number of words per analysis window (default: 1000).
+            Larger windows provide more stable chi-squared but fewer comparisons.
+        stride: Number of words to advance between windows (default: 500).
+            - stride == window_size: Non-overlapping chunks
+            - stride < window_size: Overlapping windows (smoother detection)
+            - stride > window_size: Gaps between windows (sparse sampling)
+        comparison_mode: How to compare windows (default: "sequential")
+            - "sequential": Compare adjacent windows only (1-2, 2-3, 3-4)
+            - "all_pairs": Compare every window pair (produces distance matrix)
+            - "fixed_lag": Compare windows at fixed distance (e.g., 1-3, 2-4)
+        lag: Window distance for fixed_lag mode (default: 1, ignored otherwise)
+        n_words: Top N most frequent words for chi-squared (default: 500)
+
+    Returns:
+        KilgarriffDriftResult containing:
+            - status: "success", "marginal_data", or "insufficient_data"
+            - pattern: Classified pattern name
+            - pattern_confidence: 0.0-1.0 confidence score
+            - mean_chi_squared, std_chi_squared, max_chi_squared: Statistics
+            - trend: Slope of chi-squared over document
+            - pairwise_scores: Detailed per-pair data
+            - And more (see KilgarriffDriftResult docstring)
+
+    Raises:
+        ValueError: If stride is 0 or negative
+
+    Example:
+        >>> # Basic usage
+        >>> result = compute_kilgarriff_drift(long_text)
+        >>> print(f"Pattern: {result.pattern}")
+        >>> print(f"Confidence: {result.pattern_confidence:.2f}")
+
+        >>> # Custom sliding window
+        >>> result = compute_kilgarriff_drift(
+        ...     text,
+        ...     window_size=2000,  # Larger windows
+        ...     stride=1000,       # 50% overlap
+        ... )
+
+        >>> # Check for AI-generated content
+        >>> if result.pattern == "suspiciously_uniform":
+        ...     print("Warning: Text may be AI-generated")
+
+        >>> # Handle insufficient data gracefully
+        >>> if result.status == "insufficient_data":
+        ...     print(result.status_message)
+    """
+    # Input validation
+    if stride <= 0:
+        raise ValueError(f"stride must be positive, got {stride}")
+    if window_size <= 0:
+        raise ValueError(f"window_size must be positive, got {window_size}")
+    valid_modes = ("sequential", "all_pairs", "fixed_lag")
+    if comparison_mode not in valid_modes:
+        raise ValueError(f"comparison_mode must be one of {valid_modes}, got '{comparison_mode}'")
+
+    # Tokenize text
+    tokens = [t.lower() for t in tokenize(text) if t.isalpha()]
+
+    # Create sliding windows
+    windows = _create_sliding_windows(tokens, window_size, stride)
+    window_count = len(windows)
+
+    # Compute overlap ratio for metadata
+    overlap_ratio = max(0.0, 1 - (stride / window_size))
+
+    # Get thresholds for transparency
+    thresholds = get_all_thresholds()
+
+    # Check for insufficient data
+    if window_count < MIN_WINDOWS:
+        return KilgarriffDriftResult(
+            status="insufficient_data",
+            status_message=(
+                f"Text produced {window_count} windows; minimum {MIN_WINDOWS} required. "
+                f"Need approximately {window_size + (MIN_WINDOWS - 1) * stride} words."
+            ),
+            pattern="unknown",
+            pattern_confidence=0.0,
+            mean_chi_squared=float("nan"),
+            std_chi_squared=float("nan"),
+            max_chi_squared=float("nan"),
+            min_chi_squared=float("nan"),
+            max_location=-1,
+            trend=float("nan"),
+            pairwise_scores=[],
+            window_size=window_size,
+            stride=stride,
+            overlap_ratio=overlap_ratio,
+            comparison_mode=comparison_mode,
+            window_count=window_count,
+            distance_matrix=None,
+            thresholds=thresholds,
+            metadata={
+                "total_tokens": len(tokens),
+                "tokens_per_window": [len(w) for w in windows],
+            },
+        )
+
+    # Determine which pairs to compare based on mode
+    pairs_to_compare: list[tuple[int, int]] = []
+
+    if comparison_mode == "sequential":
+        # Compare adjacent windows: (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), ...
+        pairs_to_compare = [(i, i + 1) for i in range(window_count - 1)]
+
+    elif comparison_mode == "all_pairs":
+        # Compare all window pairs: (0,1), (0,2), ..., (n-2,n-1)
+        pairs_to_compare = [(i, j) for i in range(window_count) for j in range(i + 1, window_count)]
+
+    elif comparison_mode == "fixed_lag":
+        # Compare windows at fixed lag distance: (0,lag), (1,lag+1), ...
+        pairs_to_compare = [
+            (i, i + lag) for i in range(window_count - lag) if i + lag < window_count
+        ]
+
+    # Compute chi-squared for each pair
+    pairwise_scores: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
+    chi_squared_values: list[float] = []
+
+    for i, j in pairs_to_compare:
+        chi_sq, df, contributions, details = _kilgarriff_core(
+            windows[i], windows[j], n_words=n_words
+        )
+
+        pairwise_scores.append(
+            {
+                "chunk_pair": (i, j),
+                "chi_squared": chi_sq,
+                "degrees_of_freedom": df,
+                "top_words": contributions[:10],  # Top 10 contributing words
+                "window_i_size": len(windows[i]),
+                "window_j_size": len(windows[j]),
+            }
+        )
+        chi_squared_values.append(chi_sq)
+
+    # Build distance matrix for all_pairs mode
+    distance_matrix: list[list[float]] | None = None
+    if comparison_mode == "all_pairs":
+        distance_matrix = [[0.0] * window_count for _ in range(window_count)]
+        for score in pairwise_scores:
+            i, j = score["chunk_pair"]
+            distance_matrix[i][j] = score["chi_squared"]
+            distance_matrix[j][i] = score["chi_squared"]  # Symmetric
+
+    # Compute holistic statistics
+    if chi_squared_values:
+        mean_chi = statistics.mean(chi_squared_values)
+        std_chi = statistics.stdev(chi_squared_values) if len(chi_squared_values) > 1 else 0.0
+        max_chi = max(chi_squared_values)
+        min_chi = min(chi_squared_values)
+        max_location = chi_squared_values.index(max_chi)
+    else:
+        mean_chi = std_chi = max_chi = min_chi = float("nan")
+        max_location = -1
+
+    # Compute trend (only meaningful for sequential comparisons)
+    if comparison_mode == "sequential" and len(chi_squared_values) >= 2:
+        trend_slope, trend_r_squared = _compute_trend(chi_squared_values)
+    else:
+        trend_slope = 0.0
+        trend_r_squared = 0.0
+
+    # Classify pattern
+    pattern, pattern_confidence = _classify_pattern(
+        mean_chi=mean_chi,
+        std_chi=std_chi,
+        max_chi=max_chi,
+        min_chi=min_chi,
+        trend_slope=trend_slope,
+        trend_r_squared=trend_r_squared,
+        window_count=window_count,
+    )
+
+    # Determine status
+    if window_count >= RECOMMENDED_WINDOWS:
+        status = "success"
+        status_message = f"Analyzed {window_count} windows with {len(pairwise_scores)} comparisons."
+    else:
+        status = "marginal_data"
+        status_message = (
+            f"Analyzed {window_count} windows; {RECOMMENDED_WINDOWS}+ recommended "
+            f"for reliable pattern classification."
+        )
+
+    return KilgarriffDriftResult(
+        status=status,
+        status_message=status_message,
+        pattern=pattern,
+        pattern_confidence=pattern_confidence,
+        mean_chi_squared=mean_chi,
+        std_chi_squared=std_chi,
+        max_chi_squared=max_chi,
+        min_chi_squared=min_chi,
+        max_location=max_location,
+        trend=trend_slope,
+        pairwise_scores=pairwise_scores,
+        window_size=window_size,
+        stride=stride,
+        overlap_ratio=overlap_ratio,
+        comparison_mode=comparison_mode,
+        window_count=window_count,
+        distance_matrix=distance_matrix,
+        thresholds=thresholds,
+        metadata={
+            "total_tokens": len(tokens),
+            "tokens_per_window": [len(w) for w in windows],
+            "comparisons_made": len(pairwise_scores),
+            "trend_r_squared": trend_r_squared,
+            "n_words_used": n_words,
+            "method": "kilgarriff_drift_2001",
+        },
+    )

pystylometry/dialect/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# dialect
+
+![1 public function](https://img.shields.io/badge/functions-1-blue)
+![No external deps](https://img.shields.io/badge/deps-none-brightgreen)
+
+Regional dialect detection (British vs. American English) with markedness scoring.
+
+## Catalogue
+
+| File | Function | What It Does |
+|------|----------|-------------|
+| `detector.py` | `compute_dialect` | Classifies text dialect, computes British/American scores, markedness |
+| `_loader.py` | `get_markers`, `DialectMarkers` | Loads and caches extensible JSON marker database |
+| `_data/dialect_markers.json` | _(data)_ | Vocabulary, spelling, grammar, and eye-dialect markers |
+
+## Detection Categories
+
+- **Vocabulary** -- flat/apartment, lorry/truck, boot/trunk
+- **Spelling** -- colour/color, organise/organize, centre/center
+- **Grammar** -- collective noun agreement, "have got" patterns
+- **Eye dialect** -- gonna, wanna (register markers, not true dialect)
+
+## See Also
+
+- [`stylistic/`](../stylistic/) for broader style marker analysis
+- [`stylistic/genre_register.py`](../stylistic/) for formality and register classification

pystylometry/dialect/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+"""Dialect detection module for stylometric analysis.
+
+This module provides dialect detection capabilities, identifying regional
+linguistic preferences (British vs. American English) and measuring text
+markedness - how far the text deviates from "unmarked" standard English.
+
+Related GitHub Issues:
+    #35 - Dialect detection with extensible JSON markers
+    https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/35
+    #30 - Whonix stylometry features (regional linguistic preferences)
+    https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/30
+    #27 - Native chunked analysis with Distribution dataclass
+    https://github.com/craigtrim/pystylometry/issues/27
+
+Features:
+    - British/American vocabulary matching (flat/apartment, lorry/truck)
+    - Spelling pattern detection (-ise/-ize, -our/-or, -re/-er)
+    - Grammar pattern analysis (have got/have, collective noun agreement)
+    - Eye dialect identification (gonna, wanna - register, not dialect)
+    - Feature weighting based on linguistic research
+    - Markedness scoring for stylistic analysis
+    - Native chunked analysis with distribution statistics
+
+The analysis uses an extensible JSON database (dialect_markers.json) that
+can be augmented with additional markers over time.
+
+Usage:
+    >>> from pystylometry.dialect import compute_dialect
+    >>> result = compute_dialect("The colour of the programme was brilliant.")
+    >>> result.dialect
+    'british'
+    >>> result.british_score
+    0.85
+    >>> result.markedness_score
+    0.42
+
+    >>> # Access distributions for stylometric fingerprinting
+    >>> result.british_score_dist.std  # Variance across chunks
+    0.05
+
+    >>> # Inspect detailed marker breakdown
+    >>> result.spelling_markers
+    {'colour': 1, 'programme': 1}
+    >>> result.markers_by_level['phonological']
+    {'colour': 1}
+
+References:
+    Goebl, Hans. "Dialektometrie: Prinzipien und Methoden des Einsatzes der
+        numerischen Taxonomie im Bereich der Dialektgeographie." Verlag der
+        Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1982.
+    Nerbonne, John. "Data-Driven Dialectology." Language and Linguistics
+        Compass, vol. 3, no. 1, 2009, pp. 175-198.
+    Whonix Project. "Stylometry: Deanonymization Techniques." Whonix Wiki,
+        https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Stylometry
+"""
+
+from ._loader import DialectMarkers, clear_cache, get_markers
+from .detector import compute_dialect
+
+__all__ = [
+    "compute_dialect",
+    "get_markers",
+    "clear_cache",
+    "DialectMarkers",
+]