pointblank 0.14.0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.16.0__py3-none-any.whl

pointblank/data/api-docs.txt

@@ -289,6 +289,16 @@ Validate(data: 'FrameT | Any', tbl_name: 'str | None' = None, label: 'str | None
     - Vietnamese (`"vi"`)
     - Indonesian (`"id"`)
     - Ukrainian (`"uk"`)
+    - Bulgarian (`"bg"`)
+    - Croatian (`"hr"`)
+    - Estonian (`"et"`)
+    - Hungarian (`"hu"`)
+    - Irish (`"ga"`)
+    - Latvian (`"lv"`)
+    - Lithuanian (`"lt"`)
+    - Maltese (`"mt"`)
+    - Slovak (`"sk"`)
+    - Slovenian (`"sl"`)
     - Hebrew (`"he"`)
     - Thai (`"th"`)
     - Persian (`"fa"`)
@@ -1157,7 +1167,7 @@ Definition of a schema object.
     `Schema` object is used in a validation workflow.
     
 
-DraftValidation(data: 'FrameT | Any', model: 'str', api_key: 'str | None' = None) -> None
+DraftValidation(data: 'FrameT | Any', model: 'str', api_key: 'str | None' = None, verify_ssl: 'bool' = True) -> None
 
     Draft a validation plan for a given table using an LLM.
 
@@ -1180,10 +1190,15 @@ DraftValidation(data: 'FrameT | Any', model: 'str', api_key: 'str | None' = None
         The data to be used for drafting a validation plan.
     model
         The model to be used. This should be in the form of `provider:model` (e.g.,
-        `"anthropic:claude-3-5-sonnet-latest"`). Supported providers are `"anthropic"`, `"openai"`,
+        `"anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5"`). Supported providers are `"anthropic"`, `"openai"`,
         `"ollama"`, and `"bedrock"`.
     api_key
         The API key to be used for the model.
+    verify_ssl
+        Whether to verify SSL certificates when making requests to the LLM provider. Set to `False`
+        to disable SSL verification (e.g., when behind a corporate firewall with self-signed
+        certificates). Defaults to `True`. Use with caution as disabling SSL verification can pose
+        security risks.
 
     Returns
     -------
@@ -1225,6 +1240,33 @@ DraftValidation(data: 'FrameT | Any', model: 'str', api_key: 'str | None' = None
     There's no need to have the `python-dotenv` package installed when using `.env` files in this
     way.
 
+    Notes on SSL Certificate Verification
+    --------------------------------------
+    By default, SSL certificate verification is enabled for all requests to LLM providers. However,
+    in certain network environments (such as corporate networks with self-signed certificates or
+    firewall proxies), you may encounter SSL certificate verification errors.
+
+    To disable SSL verification, set the `verify_ssl` parameter to `False`:
+
+    ```python
+    import pointblank as pb
+
+    data = pb.load_dataset(dataset="nycflights", tbl_type="duckdb")
+
+    # Disable SSL verification for networks with self-signed certificates
+    pb.DraftValidation(
+        data=data,
+        model="anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5",
+        verify_ssl=False
+    )
+    ```
+
+    :::{.callout-warning}
+    Disabling SSL verification (through `verify_ssl=False`) can expose your API keys and data to
+    man-in-the-middle attacks. Only use this option in trusted network environments and when
+    absolutely necessary.
+    :::
+
     Notes on Data Sent to the Model Provider
     ----------------------------------------
     The data sent to the model provider is a JSON summary of the table. This data summary is
@@ -1251,7 +1293,7 @@ DraftValidation(data: 'FrameT | Any', model: 'str', api_key: 'str | None' = None
     Let's look at how the `DraftValidation` class can be used to draft a validation plan for a
     table. The table to be used is `"nycflights"`, which is available here via the
     [`load_dataset()`](`pointblank.load_dataset`) function. The model to be used is
-    `"anthropic:claude-3-5-sonnet-latest"` (which performs very well compared to other LLMs). The
+    `"anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5"` (which performs very well compared to other LLMs). The
     example assumes that the API key is stored in an `.env` file as `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`.
 
     ```python
@@ -1261,7 +1303,7 @@ DraftValidation(data: 'FrameT | Any', model: 'str', api_key: 'str | None' = None
     data = pb.load_dataset(dataset="nycflights", tbl_type="duckdb")
 
     # Draft a validation plan for the "nycflights" table
-    pb.DraftValidation(data=data, model="anthropic:claude-3-5-sonnet-latest")
+    pb.DraftValidation(data=data, model="anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5")
     ```
 
     The output will be a drafted validation plan for the `"nycflights"` table and this will appear
@@ -3645,6 +3687,262 @@ col_vals_not_in_set(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector |
         statuses in the `InvalidStatus` enum.
         
 
+col_vals_increasing(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals', allow_stationary: 'bool' = False, decreasing_tol: 'float | None' = None, na_pass: 'bool' = False, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+
+        Are column data increasing by row?
+
+        The `col_vals_increasing()` validation method checks whether column values in a table are
+        increasing when moving down a table. There are options for allowing missing values in the
+        target column, allowing stationary phases (where consecutive values don't change), and even
+        one for allowing decreasing movements up to a certain threshold. This validation will
+        operate over the number of test units that is equal to the number of rows in the table
+        (determined after any `pre=` mutation has been applied).
+
+        Parameters
+        ----------
+        columns
+            A single column or a list of columns to validate. Can also use
+            [`col()`](`pointblank.col`) with column selectors to specify one or more columns. If
+            multiple columns are supplied or resolved, there will be a separate validation step
+            generated for each column.
+        allow_stationary
+            An option to allow pauses in increasing values. For example, if the values for the test
+            units are `[80, 82, 82, 85, 88]` then the third unit (`82`, appearing a second time)
+            would be marked as failing when `allow_stationary` is `False`. Using
+            `allow_stationary=True` will result in all the test units in `[80, 82, 82, 85, 88]` to
+            be marked as passing.
+        decreasing_tol
+            An optional threshold value that allows for movement of numerical values in the negative
+            direction. By default this is `None` but using a numerical value will set the absolute
+            threshold of negative travel allowed across numerical test units. Note that setting a
+            value here also has the effect of setting `allow_stationary` to `True`.
+        na_pass
+            Should any encountered None, NA, or Null values be considered as passing test units? By
+            default, this is `False`. Set to `True` to pass test units with missing values.
+        pre
+            An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
+            interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
+            Have a look at the *Preprocessing* section for more information on how to use this
+            argument.
+        segments
+            An optional directive on segmentation, which serves to split a validation step into
+            multiple (one step per segment). Can be a single column name, a tuple that specifies a
+            column name and its corresponding values to segment on, or a combination of both
+            (provided as a list). Read the *Segmentation* section for usage information.
+        thresholds
+            Set threshold failure levels for reporting and reacting to exceedences of the levels.
+            The thresholds are set at the step level and will override any global thresholds set in
+            `Validate(thresholds=...)`. The default is `None`, which means that no thresholds will
+            be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect. Look at the *Thresholds*
+            section for information on how to set threshold levels.
+        actions
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step(s) meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
+            define the actions.
+        brief
+            An optional brief description of the validation step that will be displayed in the
+            reporting table. You can use the templating elements like `"{step}"` to insert
+            the step number, or `"{auto}"` to include an automatically generated brief. If `True`
+            the entire brief will be automatically generated. If `None` (the default) then there
+            won't be a brief.
+        active
+            A boolean value indicating whether the validation step should be active. Using `False`
+            will make the validation step inactive (still reporting its presence and keeping indexes
+            for the steps unchanged).
+
+        Returns
+        -------
+        Validate
+            The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
+
+        Examples
+        --------
+        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with a numeric column (`a`). The
+        table is shown below:
+
+        ```python
+        import pointblank as pb
+        import polars as pl
+
+        tbl = pl.DataFrame(
+            {
+                "a": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
+                "b": [1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5],
+                "c": [1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5],
+            }
+        )
+
+        pb.preview(tbl)
+        ```
+
+        Let's validate that values in column `a` are increasing. We'll determine if this validation
+        had any failing test units (there are six test units, one for each row).
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_vals_increasing(columns="a")
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        The validation passed as all values in column `a` are increasing. Now let's check column
+        `b` which has a stationary value:
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_vals_increasing(columns="b")
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        This validation fails at the third row because the value `2` is repeated. If we want to
+        allow stationary values, we can use `allow_stationary=True`:
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_vals_increasing(columns="b", allow_stationary=True)
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+        
+
+col_vals_decreasing(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals', allow_stationary: 'bool' = False, increasing_tol: 'float | None' = None, na_pass: 'bool' = False, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+
+        Are column data decreasing by row?
+
+        The `col_vals_decreasing()` validation method checks whether column values in a table are
+        decreasing when moving down a table. There are options for allowing missing values in the
+        target column, allowing stationary phases (where consecutive values don't change), and even
+        one for allowing increasing movements up to a certain threshold. This validation will
+        operate over the number of test units that is equal to the number of rows in the table
+        (determined after any `pre=` mutation has been applied).
+
+        Parameters
+        ----------
+        columns
+            A single column or a list of columns to validate. Can also use
+            [`col()`](`pointblank.col`) with column selectors to specify one or more columns. If
+            multiple columns are supplied or resolved, there will be a separate validation step
+            generated for each column.
+        allow_stationary
+            An option to allow pauses in decreasing values. For example, if the values for the test
+            units are `[88, 85, 85, 82, 80]` then the third unit (`85`, appearing a second time)
+            would be marked as failing when `allow_stationary` is `False`. Using
+            `allow_stationary=True` will result in all the test units in `[88, 85, 85, 82, 80]` to
+            be marked as passing.
+        increasing_tol
+            An optional threshold value that allows for movement of numerical values in the positive
+            direction. By default this is `None` but using a numerical value will set the absolute
+            threshold of positive travel allowed across numerical test units. Note that setting a
+            value here also has the effect of setting `allow_stationary` to `True`.
+        na_pass
+            Should any encountered None, NA, or Null values be considered as passing test units? By
+            default, this is `False`. Set to `True` to pass test units with missing values.
+        pre
+            An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
+            interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
+            Have a look at the *Preprocessing* section for more information on how to use this
+            argument.
+        segments
+            An optional directive on segmentation, which serves to split a validation step into
+            multiple (one step per segment). Can be a single column name, a tuple that specifies a
+            column name and its corresponding values to segment on, or a combination of both
+            (provided as a list). Read the *Segmentation* section for usage information.
+        thresholds
+            Set threshold failure levels for reporting and reacting to exceedences of the levels.
+            The thresholds are set at the step level and will override any global thresholds set in
+            `Validate(thresholds=...)`. The default is `None`, which means that no thresholds will
+            be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect. Look at the *Thresholds*
+            section for information on how to set threshold levels.
+        actions
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step(s) meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
+            define the actions.
+        brief
+            An optional brief description of the validation step that will be displayed in the
+            reporting table. You can use the templating elements like `"{step}"` to insert
+            the step number, or `"{auto}"` to include an automatically generated brief. If `True`
+            the entire brief will be automatically generated. If `None` (the default) then there
+            won't be a brief.
+        active
+            A boolean value indicating whether the validation step should be active. Using `False`
+            will make the validation step inactive (still reporting its presence and keeping indexes
+            for the steps unchanged).
+
+        Returns
+        -------
+        Validate
+            The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
+
+        Examples
+        --------
+        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with a numeric column (`a`). The
+        table is shown below:
+
+        ```python
+        import pointblank as pb
+        import polars as pl
+
+        tbl = pl.DataFrame(
+            {
+                "a": [6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1],
+                "b": [5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1],
+                "c": [5, 4, 5, 3, 2, 1],
+            }
+        )
+
+        pb.preview(tbl)
+        ```
+
+        Let's validate that values in column `a` are decreasing. We'll determine if this validation
+        had any failing test units (there are six test units, one for each row).
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_vals_decreasing(columns="a")
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        The validation passed as all values in column `a` are decreasing. Now let's check column
+        `b` which has a stationary value:
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_vals_decreasing(columns="b")
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        This validation fails at the third row because the value `4` is repeated. If we want to
+        allow stationary values, we can use `allow_stationary=True`:
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_vals_decreasing(columns="b", allow_stationary=True)
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+        
+
 col_vals_null(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
 
         Validate whether values in a column are Null.
@@ -4213,22 +4511,31 @@ col_vals_regex(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | Colum
         string values of rows 1 and 2 in column `b`.
         
 
-col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+col_vals_within_spec(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals', spec: 'str', na_pass: 'bool' = False, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
 
-        Validate column values using a custom expression.
+        Validate whether column values fit within a specification.
 
-        The `col_vals_expr()` validation method checks whether column values in a table satisfy a
-        custom `expr=` expression. This validation will operate over the number of test units that
-        is equal to the number of rows in the table (determined after any `pre=` mutation has been
-        applied).
+        The `col_vals_within_spec()` validation method checks whether column values in a table
+        correspond to a specification (`spec=`) type (details of which are available in the
+        *Specifications* section). Specifications include common data types like email addresses,
+        URLs, postal codes, vehicle identification numbers (VINs), International Bank Account
+        Numbers (IBANs), and more. This validation will operate over the number of test units that
+        is equal to the number of rows in the table.
 
         Parameters
         ----------
-        expr
-            A column expression that will evaluate each row in the table, returning a boolean value
-            per table row. If the target table is a Polars DataFrame, the expression should either
-            be a Polars column expression or a Narwhals one. For a Pandas DataFrame, the expression
-            should either be a lambda expression or a Narwhals column expression.
+        columns
+            A single column or a list of columns to validate. Can also use
+            [`col()`](`pointblank.col`) with column selectors to specify one or more columns. If
+            multiple columns are supplied or resolved, there will be a separate validation step
+            generated for each column.
+        spec
+            A specification string for defining the specification type. Examples are `"email"`,
+            `"url"`, and `"postal_code[USA]"`. See the *Specifications* section for all available
+            options.
+        na_pass
+            Should any encountered None, NA, or Null values be considered as passing test units? By
+            default, this is `False`. Set to `True` to pass test units with missing values.
         pre
             An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
             interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
@@ -4246,7 +4553,7 @@ col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'Segme
             be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect. Look at the *Thresholds*
             section for information on how to set threshold levels.
         actions
-            Optional actions to take when the validation step meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step(s) meets or exceeds any set threshold
             levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
             define the actions.
         brief
@@ -4265,6 +4572,40 @@ col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'Segme
         Validate
             The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
 
+        Specifications
+        --------------
+        A specification type must be used with the `spec=` argument. This is a string-based keyword
+        that corresponds to the type of data in the specified columns. The following keywords can
+        be used:
+
+        - `"isbn"`: The International Standard Book Number (ISBN) is a unique numerical identifier
+          for books. This keyword validates both 10-digit and 13-digit ISBNs.
+
+        - `"vin"`: A vehicle identification number (VIN) is a unique code used by the automotive
+          industry to identify individual motor vehicles.
+
+        - `"postal_code[<country_code>]"`: A postal code (also known as postcodes, PIN, or ZIP
+          codes) is a series of letters, digits, or both included in a postal address. Because the
+          coding varies by country, a country code in either the 2-letter (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2) or
+          3-letter (ISO 3166-1 alpha-3) format needs to be supplied (e.g., `"postal_code[US]"` or
+          `"postal_code[USA]"`). The keyword alias `"zip"` can be used for US ZIP codes.
+
+        - `"credit_card"`: A credit card number can be validated across a variety of issuers. The
+          validation uses the Luhn algorithm.
+
+        - `"iban[<country_code>]"`: The International Bank Account Number (IBAN) is a system of
+          identifying bank accounts across countries. Because the length and coding varies by
+          country, a country code needs to be supplied (e.g., `"iban[DE]"` or `"iban[DEU]"`).
+
+        - `"swift"`: Business Identifier Codes (also known as SWIFT-BIC, BIC, or SWIFT code) are
+          unique identifiers for financial and non-financial institutions.
+
+        - `"phone"`, `"email"`, `"url"`, `"ipv4"`, `"ipv6"`, `"mac"`: Phone numbers, email
+          addresses, Internet URLs, IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, and MAC addresses can be validated with
+          their respective keywords.
+
+        Only a single `spec=` value should be provided per function call.
+
         Preprocessing
         -------------
         The `pre=` argument allows for a preprocessing function or lambda to be applied to the data
@@ -4274,9 +4615,11 @@ col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'Segme
 
         The preprocessing function can be any callable that takes a table as input and returns a
         modified table. For example, you could use a lambda function to filter the table based on
-        certain criteria or to apply a transformation to the data. Regarding the lifetime of the
-        transformed table, it only exists during the validation step and is not stored in the
-        `Validate` object or used in subsequent validation steps.
+        certain criteria or to apply a transformation to the data. Note that you can refer to
+        a column via `columns=` that is expected to be present in the transformed table, but may not
+        exist in the table before preprocessing. Regarding the lifetime of the transformed table, it
+        only exists during the validation step and is not stored in the `Validate` object or used in
+        subsequent validation steps.
 
         Segmentation
         ------------
@@ -4348,8 +4691,8 @@ col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'Segme
 
         Examples
         --------
-        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with three columns (`a`, `b`, and
-        `c`). The table is shown below:
+        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with an email column. The table
+        is shown below:
 
         ```python
         import pointblank as pb
@@ -4357,48 +4700,61 @@ col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'Segme
 
         tbl = pl.DataFrame(
             {
-                "a": [1, 2, 1, 7, 8, 6],
-                "b": [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1],
-                "c": [0.5, 0.3, 0.8, 1.4, 1.9, 1.2],
+                "email": [
+                    "user@example.com",
+                    "admin@test.org",
+                    "invalid-email",
+                    "contact@company.co.uk",
+                ],
             }
         )
 
         pb.preview(tbl)
         ```
 
-        Let's validate that the values in column `a` are all integers. We'll determine if this
-        validation had any failing test units (there are six test units, one for each row).
+        Let's validate that all of the values in the `email` column are valid email addresses.
+        We'll determine if this validation had any failing test units (there are four test units,
+        one for each row).
 
         ```python
         validation = (
             pb.Validate(data=tbl)
-            .col_vals_expr(expr=pl.col("a") % 1 == 0)
+            .col_vals_within_spec(columns="email", spec="email")
             .interrogate()
         )
 
         validation
         ```
 
-        Printing the `validation` object shows the validation table in an HTML viewing environment.
-        The validation table shows the single entry that corresponds to the validation step created
-        by using `col_vals_expr()`. All test units passed, with no failing test units.
+        The validation table shows that one test unit failed (the invalid email address in row 3).
         
 
-col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals', thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+col_vals_expr(self, expr: 'any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
 
-        Validate whether one or more columns exist in the table.
+        Validate column values using a custom expression.
 
-        The `col_exists()` method checks whether one or more columns exist in the target table. The
-        only requirement is specification of the column names. Each validation step or expectation
-        will operate over a single test unit, which is whether the column exists or not.
+        The `col_vals_expr()` validation method checks whether column values in a table satisfy a
+        custom `expr=` expression. This validation will operate over the number of test units that
+        is equal to the number of rows in the table (determined after any `pre=` mutation has been
+        applied).
 
         Parameters
         ----------
-        columns
-            A single column or a list of columns to validate. Can also use
-            [`col()`](`pointblank.col`) with column selectors to specify one or more columns. If
-            multiple columns are supplied or resolved, there will be a separate validation step
-            generated for each column.
+        expr
+            A column expression that will evaluate each row in the table, returning a boolean value
+            per table row. If the target table is a Polars DataFrame, the expression should either
+            be a Polars column expression or a Narwhals one. For a Pandas DataFrame, the expression
+            should either be a lambda expression or a Narwhals column expression.
+        pre
+            An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
+            interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
+            Have a look at the *Preprocessing* section for more information on how to use this
+            argument.
+        segments
+            An optional directive on segmentation, which serves to split a validation step into
+            multiple (one step per segment). Can be a single column name, a tuple that specifies a
+            column name and its corresponding values to segment on, or a combination of both
+            (provided as a list). Read the *Segmentation* section for usage information.
         thresholds
             Set threshold failure levels for reporting and reacting to exceedences of the levels.
             The thresholds are set at the step level and will override any global thresholds set in
@@ -4406,7 +4762,7 @@ col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSel
             be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect. Look at the *Thresholds*
             section for information on how to set threshold levels.
         actions
-            Optional actions to take when the validation step(s) meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step meets or exceeds any set threshold
             levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
             define the actions.
         brief
@@ -4425,6 +4781,59 @@ col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSel
         Validate
             The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
 
+        Preprocessing
+        -------------
+        The `pre=` argument allows for a preprocessing function or lambda to be applied to the data
+        table during interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified
+        table. This is useful for performing any necessary transformations or filtering on the data
+        before the validation step is applied.
+
+        The preprocessing function can be any callable that takes a table as input and returns a
+        modified table. For example, you could use a lambda function to filter the table based on
+        certain criteria or to apply a transformation to the data. Regarding the lifetime of the
+        transformed table, it only exists during the validation step and is not stored in the
+        `Validate` object or used in subsequent validation steps.
+
+        Segmentation
+        ------------
+        The `segments=` argument allows for the segmentation of a validation step into multiple
+        segments. This is useful for applying the same validation step to different subsets of the
+        data. The segmentation can be done based on a single column or specific fields within a
+        column.
+
+        Providing a single column name will result in a separate validation step for each unique
+        value in that column. For example, if you have a column called `"region"` with values
+        `"North"`, `"South"`, and `"East"`, the validation step will be applied separately to each
+        region.
+
+        Alternatively, you can provide a tuple that specifies a column name and its corresponding
+        values to segment on. For example, if you have a column called `"date"` and you want to
+        segment on only specific dates, you can provide a tuple like
+        `("date", ["2023-01-01", "2023-01-02"])`. Any other values in the column will be disregarded
+        (i.e., no validation steps will be created for them).
+
+        A list with a combination of column names and tuples can be provided as well. This allows
+        for more complex segmentation scenarios. The following inputs are both valid:
+
+        ```
+        # Segments from all unique values in the `region` column
+        # and specific dates in the `date` column
+        segments=["region", ("date", ["2023-01-01", "2023-01-02"])]
+
+        # Segments from all unique values in the `region` and `date` columns
+        segments=["region", "date"]
+        ```
+
+        The segmentation is performed during interrogation, and the resulting validation steps will
+        be numbered sequentially. Each segment will have its own validation step, and the results
+        will be reported separately. This allows for a more granular analysis of the data and helps
+        identify issues within specific segments.
+
+        Importantly, the segmentation process will be performed after any preprocessing of the data
+        table. Because of this, one can conceivably use the `pre=` argument to generate a column
+        that can be used for segmentation. For example, you could create a new column called
+        `"segment"` through use of `pre=` and then use that column for segmentation.
+
         Thresholds
         ----------
         The `thresholds=` parameter is used to set the failure-condition levels for the validation
@@ -4455,8 +4864,8 @@ col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSel
 
         Examples
         --------
-        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with a string columns (`a`) and a
-        numeric column (`b`). The table is shown below:
+        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with three columns (`a`, `b`, and
+        `c`). The table is shown below:
 
         ```python
         import pointblank as pb
@@ -4464,21 +4873,22 @@ col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSel
 
         tbl = pl.DataFrame(
             {
-                "a": ["apple", "banana", "cherry", "date"],
-                "b": [1, 6, 3, 5],
+                "a": [1, 2, 1, 7, 8, 6],
+                "b": [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1],
+                "c": [0.5, 0.3, 0.8, 1.4, 1.9, 1.2],
             }
         )
 
         pb.preview(tbl)
         ```
 
-        Let's validate that the columns `a` and `b` actually exist in the table. We'll determine if
-        this validation had any failing test units (each validation will have a single test unit).
+        Let's validate that the values in column `a` are all integers. We'll determine if this
+        validation had any failing test units (there are six test units, one for each row).
 
         ```python
         validation = (
             pb.Validate(data=tbl)
-            .col_exists(columns=["a", "b"])
+            .col_vals_expr(expr=pl.col("a") % 1 == 0)
             .interrogate()
         )
 
@@ -4486,24 +4896,8 @@ col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSel
         ```
 
         Printing the `validation` object shows the validation table in an HTML viewing environment.
-        The validation table shows two entries (one check per column) generated by the
-        `col_exists()` validation step. Both steps passed since both columns provided in `columns=`
-        are present in the table.
-
-        Now, let's check for the existence of a different set of columns.
-
-        ```python
-        validation = (
-            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
-            .col_exists(columns=["b", "c"])
-            .interrogate()
-        )
-
-        validation
-        ```
-
-        The validation table reports one passing validation step (the check for column `b`) and one
-        failing validation step (the check for column `c`, which doesn't exist).
+        The validation table shows the single entry that corresponds to the validation step created
+        by using `col_vals_expr()`. All test units passed, with no failing test units.
         
 
 rows_distinct(self, columns_subset: 'str | list[str] | None' = None, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
@@ -4886,6 +5280,128 @@ rows_complete(self, columns_subset: 'str | list[str] | None' = None, pre: 'Calla
         others.
         
 
+col_exists(self, columns: 'str | list[str] | Column | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals', thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+
+        Validate whether one or more columns exist in the table.
+
+        The `col_exists()` method checks whether one or more columns exist in the target table. The
+        only requirement is specification of the column names. Each validation step or expectation
+        will operate over a single test unit, which is whether the column exists or not.
+
+        Parameters
+        ----------
+        columns
+            A single column or a list of columns to validate. Can also use
+            [`col()`](`pointblank.col`) with column selectors to specify one or more columns. If
+            multiple columns are supplied or resolved, there will be a separate validation step
+            generated for each column.
+        thresholds
+            Set threshold failure levels for reporting and reacting to exceedences of the levels.
+            The thresholds are set at the step level and will override any global thresholds set in
+            `Validate(thresholds=...)`. The default is `None`, which means that no thresholds will
+            be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect. Look at the *Thresholds*
+            section for information on how to set threshold levels.
+        actions
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step(s) meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
+            define the actions.
+        brief
+            An optional brief description of the validation step that will be displayed in the
+            reporting table. You can use the templating elements like `"{step}"` to insert
+            the step number, or `"{auto}"` to include an automatically generated brief. If `True`
+            the entire brief will be automatically generated. If `None` (the default) then there
+            won't be a brief.
+        active
+            A boolean value indicating whether the validation step should be active. Using `False`
+            will make the validation step inactive (still reporting its presence and keeping indexes
+            for the steps unchanged).
+
+        Returns
+        -------
+        Validate
+            The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
+
+        Thresholds
+        ----------
+        The `thresholds=` parameter is used to set the failure-condition levels for the validation
+        step. If they are set here at the step level, these thresholds will override any thresholds
+        set at the global level in `Validate(thresholds=...)`.
+
+        There are three threshold levels: 'warning', 'error', and 'critical'. The threshold values
+        can either be set as a proportion failing of all test units (a value between `0` to `1`),
+        or, the absolute number of failing test units (as integer that's `1` or greater).
+
+        Thresholds can be defined using one of these input schemes:
+
+        1. use the [`Thresholds`](`pointblank.Thresholds`) class (the most direct way to create
+        thresholds)
+        2. provide a tuple of 1-3 values, where position `0` is the 'warning' level, position `1` is
+        the 'error' level, and position `2` is the 'critical' level
+        3. create a dictionary of 1-3 value entries; the valid keys: are 'warning', 'error', and
+        'critical'
+        4. a single integer/float value denoting absolute number or fraction of failing test units
+        for the 'warning' level only
+
+        If the number of failing test units exceeds set thresholds, the validation step will be
+        marked as 'warning', 'error', or 'critical'. All of the threshold levels don't need to be
+        set, you're free to set any combination of them.
+
+        Aside from reporting failure conditions, thresholds can be used to determine the actions to
+        take for each level of failure (using the `actions=` parameter).
+
+        Examples
+        --------
+        For the examples here, we'll use a simple Polars DataFrame with a string columns (`a`) and a
+        numeric column (`b`). The table is shown below:
+
+        ```python
+        import pointblank as pb
+        import polars as pl
+
+        tbl = pl.DataFrame(
+            {
+                "a": ["apple", "banana", "cherry", "date"],
+                "b": [1, 6, 3, 5],
+            }
+        )
+
+        pb.preview(tbl)
+        ```
+
+        Let's validate that the columns `a` and `b` actually exist in the table. We'll determine if
+        this validation had any failing test units (each validation will have a single test unit).
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_exists(columns=["a", "b"])
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        Printing the `validation` object shows the validation table in an HTML viewing environment.
+        The validation table shows two entries (one check per column) generated by the
+        `col_exists()` validation step. Both steps passed since both columns provided in `columns=`
+        are present in the table.
+
+        Now, let's check for the existence of a different set of columns.
+
+        ```python
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .col_exists(columns=["b", "c"])
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        The validation table reports one passing validation step (the check for column `b`) and one
+        failing validation step (the check for column `c`, which doesn't exist).
+        
+
 col_schema_match(self, schema: 'Schema', complete: 'bool' = True, in_order: 'bool' = True, case_sensitive_colnames: 'bool' = True, case_sensitive_dtypes: 'bool' = True, full_match_dtypes: 'bool' = True, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
 
         Do columns in the table (and their types) match a predefined schema?
@@ -5169,58 +5685,177 @@ row_count_match(self, count: 'int | FrameT | Any', tol: 'Tolerance' = 0, inverse
         rows in the target table. So, the single test unit passed.
 
 
-        Let's modify our example to show the different ways we can allow some tolerance to our validation
-        by using the `tol` argument.
+        Let's modify our example to show the different ways we can allow some tolerance to our validation
+        by using the `tol` argument.
+
+        ```python
+        smaller_small_table = small_table.sample(n = 12) # within the lower bound
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=smaller_small_table)
+            .row_count_match(count=13,tol=(2, 0)) # minus 2 but plus 0, ie. 11-13
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=smaller_small_table)
+            .row_count_match(count=13,tol=.05) # .05% tolerance of 13
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        even_smaller_table = small_table.sample(n = 2)
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=even_smaller_table)
+            .row_count_match(count=13,tol=5) # plus or minus 5; this test will fail
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        
+
+col_count_match(self, count: 'int | FrameT | Any', inverse: 'bool' = False, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+
+        Validate whether the column count of the table matches a specified count.
+
+        The `col_count_match()` method checks whether the column count of the target table matches a
+        specified count. This validation will operate over a single test unit, which is whether the
+        column count matches the specified count.
+
+        We also have the option to invert the validation step by setting `inverse=True`. This will
+        make the expectation that column row count of the target table *does not* match the
+        specified count.
+
+        Parameters
+        ----------
+        count
+            The expected column count of the table. This can be an integer value, a Polars or Pandas
+            DataFrame object, or an Ibis backend table. If a DataFrame/table is provided, the column
+            count of that object will be used as the expected count.
+        inverse
+            Should the validation step be inverted? If `True`, then the expectation is that the
+            column count of the target table should not match the specified `count=` value.
+        pre
+            An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
+            interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
+            Have a look at the *Preprocessing* section for more information on how to use this
+            argument.
+        thresholds
+            Set threshold failure levels for reporting and reacting to exceedences of the levels.
+            The thresholds are set at the step level and will override any global thresholds set in
+            `Validate(thresholds=...)`. The default is `None`, which means that no thresholds will
+            be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect. Look at the *Thresholds*
+            section for information on how to set threshold levels.
+        actions
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
+            define the actions.
+        brief
+            An optional brief description of the validation step that will be displayed in the
+            reporting table. You can use the templating elements like `"{step}"` to insert
+            the step number, or `"{auto}"` to include an automatically generated brief. If `True`
+            the entire brief will be automatically generated. If `None` (the default) then there
+            won't be a brief.
+        active
+            A boolean value indicating whether the validation step should be active. Using `False`
+            will make the validation step inactive (still reporting its presence and keeping indexes
+            for the steps unchanged).
+
+        Returns
+        -------
+        Validate
+            The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
+
+        Preprocessing
+        -------------
+        The `pre=` argument allows for a preprocessing function or lambda to be applied to the data
+        table during interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified
+        table. This is useful for performing any necessary transformations or filtering on the data
+        before the validation step is applied.
+
+        The preprocessing function can be any callable that takes a table as input and returns a
+        modified table. For example, you could use a lambda function to filter the table based on
+        certain criteria or to apply a transformation to the data. Regarding the lifetime of the
+        transformed table, it only exists during the validation step and is not stored in the
+        `Validate` object or used in subsequent validation steps.
+
+        Thresholds
+        ----------
+        The `thresholds=` parameter is used to set the failure-condition levels for the validation
+        step. If they are set here at the step level, these thresholds will override any thresholds
+        set at the global level in `Validate(thresholds=...)`.
+
+        There are three threshold levels: 'warning', 'error', and 'critical'. The threshold values
+        can either be set as a proportion failing of all test units (a value between `0` to `1`),
+        or, the absolute number of failing test units (as integer that's `1` or greater).
+
+        Thresholds can be defined using one of these input schemes:
+
+        1. use the [`Thresholds`](`pointblank.Thresholds`) class (the most direct way to create
+        thresholds)
+        2. provide a tuple of 1-3 values, where position `0` is the 'warning' level, position `1` is
+        the 'error' level, and position `2` is the 'critical' level
+        3. create a dictionary of 1-3 value entries; the valid keys: are 'warning', 'error', and
+        'critical'
+        4. a single integer/float value denoting absolute number or fraction of failing test units
+        for the 'warning' level only
+
+        If the number of failing test units exceeds set thresholds, the validation step will be
+        marked as 'warning', 'error', or 'critical'. All of the threshold levels don't need to be
+        set, you're free to set any combination of them.
 
-        ```python
-        smaller_small_table = small_table.sample(n = 12) # within the lower bound
-        validation = (
-            pb.Validate(data=smaller_small_table)
-            .row_count_match(count=13,tol=(2, 0)) # minus 2 but plus 0, ie. 11-13
-            .interrogate()
-        )
+        Aside from reporting failure conditions, thresholds can be used to determine the actions to
+        take for each level of failure (using the `actions=` parameter).
 
-        validation
+        Examples
+        --------
+        For the examples here, we'll use the built in dataset `"game_revenue"`. The table can be
+        obtained by calling `load_dataset("game_revenue")`.
 
-        validation = (
-            pb.Validate(data=smaller_small_table)
-            .row_count_match(count=13,tol=.05) # .05% tolerance of 13
-            .interrogate()
-        )
+        Let's validate that the number of columns in the table matches a fixed value. In this case,
+        we will use the value `11` as the expected column count.
 
-        even_smaller_table = small_table.sample(n = 2)
+        ```python
         validation = (
-            pb.Validate(data=even_smaller_table)
-            .row_count_match(count=13,tol=5) # plus or minus 5; this test will fail
+            pb.Validate(data=game_revenue)
+            .col_count_match(count=11)
             .interrogate()
         )
 
         validation
         ```
 
+        The validation table shows that the expectation value of `11` matches the actual count of
+        columns in the target table. So, the single test unit passed.
         
 
-col_count_match(self, count: 'int | FrameT | Any', inverse: 'bool' = False, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+tbl_match(self, tbl_compare: 'FrameT | Any', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
 
-        Validate whether the column count of the table matches a specified count.
+        Validate whether the target table matches a comparison table.
 
-        The `col_count_match()` method checks whether the column count of the target table matches a
-        specified count. This validation will operate over a single test unit, which is whether the
-        column count matches the specified count.
+        The `tbl_match()` method checks whether the target table's composition matches that of a
+        comparison table. The validation performs a comprehensive comparison using progressively
+        stricter checks (from least to most stringent):
 
-        We also have the option to invert the validation step by setting `inverse=True`. This will
-        make the expectation that column row count of the target table *does not* match the
-        specified count.
+        1. **Column count match**: both tables must have the same number of columns
+        2. **Row count match**: both tables must have the same number of rows
+        3. **Schema match (loose)**: column names and dtypes match (case-insensitive, any order)
+        4. **Schema match (order)**: columns in the correct order (case-insensitive names)
+        5. **Schema match (exact)**: column names match exactly (case-sensitive, correct order)
+        6. **Data match**: values in corresponding cells must be identical
+
+        This progressive approach helps identify exactly where tables differ. The validation will
+        fail at the first check that doesn't pass, making it easier to diagnose mismatches. This
+        validation operates over a single test unit (pass/fail for complete table match).
 
         Parameters
         ----------
-        count
-            The expected column count of the table. This can be an integer value, a Polars or Pandas
-            DataFrame object, or an Ibis backend table. If a DataFrame/table is provided, the column
-            count of that object will be used as the expected count.
-        inverse
-            Should the validation step be inverted? If `True`, then the expectation is that the
-            column count of the target table should not match the specified `count=` value.
+        tbl_compare
+            The comparison table to validate against. This can be a DataFrame object (Polars or
+            Pandas), an Ibis table object, or a callable that returns a table. If a callable is
+            provided, it will be executed during interrogation to obtain the comparison table.
         pre
             An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
             interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
@@ -5261,9 +5896,10 @@ col_count_match(self, count: 'int | FrameT | Any', inverse: 'bool' = False, pre:
 
         The preprocessing function can be any callable that takes a table as input and returns a
         modified table. For example, you could use a lambda function to filter the table based on
-        certain criteria or to apply a transformation to the data. Regarding the lifetime of the
-        transformed table, it only exists during the validation step and is not stored in the
-        `Validate` object or used in subsequent validation steps.
+        certain criteria or to apply a transformation to the data. Note that the same preprocessing
+        is **not** applied to the comparison table; only the target table is preprocessed. Regarding
+        the lifetime of the transformed table, it only exists during the validation step and is not
+        stored in the `Validate` object or used in subsequent validation steps.
 
         Thresholds
         ----------
@@ -5293,26 +5929,129 @@ col_count_match(self, count: 'int | FrameT | Any', inverse: 'bool' = False, pre:
         Aside from reporting failure conditions, thresholds can be used to determine the actions to
         take for each level of failure (using the `actions=` parameter).
 
+        Cross-Backend Validation
+        ------------------------
+        The `tbl_match()` method supports **automatic backend coercion** when comparing tables from
+        different backends (e.g., comparing a Polars DataFrame against a Pandas DataFrame, or
+        comparing database tables from DuckDB/SQLite against in-memory DataFrames). When tables with
+        different backends are detected, the comparison table is automatically converted to match the
+        data table's backend before validation proceeds.
+
+        **Certified Backend Combinations:**
+
+        All combinations of the following backends have been tested and certified to work (in both
+        directions):
+
+        - Pandas DataFrame
+        - Polars DataFrame
+        - DuckDB (native)
+        - DuckDB (as Ibis table)
+        - SQLite (via Ibis)
+
+        Note that database backends (DuckDB, SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Snowflake, BigQuery) are
+        automatically materialized during validation:
+
+        - if comparing **against Polars**: materialized to Polars
+        - if comparing **against Pandas**: materialized to Pandas
+        - if **both tables are database backends**: both materialized to Polars
+
+        This ensures optimal performance and type consistency.
+
+        **Data Types That Work Best in Cross-Backend Validation:**
+
+        - numeric types: int, float columns (including proper NaN handling)
+        - string types: text columns with consistent encodings
+        - boolean types: True/False values
+        - null values: `None` and `NaN` are treated as equivalent across backends
+        - list columns: nested list structures (with basic types)
+
+        **Known Limitations:**
+
+        While many data types work well in cross-backend validation, there are some known
+        limitations to be aware of:
+
+        - date/datetime types: When converting between Polars and Pandas, date objects may be
+          represented differently. For example, `datetime.date` objects in Pandas may become
+          `pd.Timestamp` objects when converted from Polars, leading to false mismatches. To work
+          around this, ensure both tables use the same datetime representation before comparison.
+        - custom types: User-defined types or complex nested structures may not convert cleanly
+          between backends and could cause unexpected comparison failures.
+        - categorical types: Categorical/factor columns may have different internal
+          representations across backends.
+        - timezone-aware datetimes: Timezone handling differs between backends and may cause
+          comparison issues.
+
+        Here are some ideas to overcome such limitations:
+
+        - for date/datetime columns, consider using `pre=` preprocessing to normalize representations
+          before comparison.
+        - when working with custom types, manually convert tables to the same backend before using
+          `tbl_match()`.
+        - use the same datetime precision (e.g., milliseconds vs microseconds) in both tables.
+
         Examples
         --------
-        For the examples here, we'll use the built in dataset `"game_revenue"`. The table can be
-        obtained by calling `load_dataset("game_revenue")`.
+        For the examples here, we'll create two simple tables to demonstrate the `tbl_match()`
+        validation.
 
-        Let's validate that the number of columns in the table matches a fixed value. In this case,
-        we will use the value `11` as the expected column count.
+        ```python
+        import pointblank as pb
+        import polars as pl
+
+        # Create the first table
+        tbl_1 = pl.DataFrame({
+            "a": [1, 2, 3, 4],
+            "b": ["w", "x", "y", "z"],
+            "c": [4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0]
+        })
+
+        # Create an identical table
+        tbl_2 = pl.DataFrame({
+            "a": [1, 2, 3, 4],
+            "b": ["w", "x", "y", "z"],
+            "c": [4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0]
+        })
+
+        pb.preview(tbl_1)
+        ```
+
+        Let's validate that `tbl_1` matches `tbl_2`. Since these tables are identical, the
+        validation should pass.
 
         ```python
         validation = (
-            pb.Validate(data=game_revenue)
-            .col_count_match(count=11)
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl_1)
+            .tbl_match(tbl_compare=tbl_2)
             .interrogate()
         )
 
         validation
         ```
 
-        The validation table shows that the expectation value of `11` matches the actual count of
-        columns in the target table. So, the single test unit passed.
+        The validation table shows that the single test unit passed, indicating that the two tables
+        match completely.
+
+        Now, let's create a table with a slight difference and see what happens.
+
+        ```python
+        # Create a table with one different value
+        tbl_3 = pl.DataFrame({
+            "a": [1, 2, 3, 4],
+            "b": ["w", "x", "y", "z"],
+            "c": [4.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0]  # Changed 5.0 to 5.5
+        })
+
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl_1)
+            .tbl_match(tbl_compare=tbl_3)
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        The validation table shows that the single test unit failed because the tables don't match
+        (one value is different in column `c`).
         
 
 conjointly(self, *exprs: 'Callable', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
@@ -5814,6 +6553,317 @@ specially(self, expr: 'Callable', pre: 'Callable | None' = None, thresholds: 'in
         virtually any data quality requirement in your organization.
         
 
+prompt(self, prompt: 'str', model: 'str', columns_subset: 'str | list[str] | None' = None, batch_size: 'int' = 1000, max_concurrent: 'int' = 3, pre: 'Callable | None' = None, segments: 'SegmentSpec | None' = None, thresholds: 'int | float | bool | tuple | dict | Thresholds' = None, actions: 'Actions | None' = None, brief: 'str | bool | None' = None, active: 'bool' = True) -> 'Validate'
+
+        Validate rows using AI/LLM-powered analysis.
+
+        The `prompt()` validation method uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to validate rows of data
+        based on natural language criteria. Similar to other Pointblank validation methods, this
+        generates binary test results (pass/fail) that integrate seamlessly with the standard
+        reporting framework.
+
+        Like `col_vals_*()` methods, `prompt()` evaluates data against specific criteria, but
+        instead of using programmatic rules, it uses natural language prompts interpreted by an LLM.
+        Like `rows_distinct()` and `rows_complete()`, it operates at the row level and allows you to
+        specify a subset of columns for evaluation using `columns_subset=`.
+
+        The system automatically combines your validation criteria from the `prompt=` parameter with
+        the necessary technical context, data formatting instructions, and response structure
+        requirements. This is all so you only need to focus on describing your validation logic in
+        plain language.
+
+        Each row becomes a test unit that either passes or fails the validation criteria, producing
+        the familiar True/False results that appear in Pointblank validation reports. This method
+        is particularly useful for complex validation rules that are difficult to express with
+        traditional validation methods, such as semantic checks, context-dependent validation, or
+        subjective quality assessments.
+
+        Parameters
+        ----------
+        prompt
+            A natural language description of the validation criteria. This prompt should clearly
+            describe what constitutes valid vs invalid rows. Some examples:
+            `"Each row should contain a valid email address and a realistic person name"`,
+            `"Values should indicate positive sentiment"`,
+            `"The description should mention a country name"`.
+        columns_subset
+            A single column or list of columns to include in the validation. If `None`, all columns
+            will be included. Specifying fewer columns can improve performance and reduce API costs
+            so try to include only the columns necessary for the validation.
+        model
+            The model to be used. This should be in the form of `provider:model` (e.g.,
+            `"anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5"`). Supported providers are `"anthropic"`, `"openai"`,
+            `"ollama"`, and `"bedrock"`. The model name should be the specific model to be used from
+            the provider. Model names are subject to change so consult the provider's documentation
+            for the most up-to-date model names.
+        batch_size
+            Number of rows to process in each batch. Larger batches are more efficient but may hit
+            API limits. Default is `1000`.
+        max_concurrent
+            Maximum number of concurrent API requests. Higher values speed up processing but may
+            hit rate limits. Default is `3`.
+        pre
+            An optional preprocessing function or lambda to apply to the data table during
+            interrogation. This function should take a table as input and return a modified table.
+        segments
+            An optional directive on segmentation, which serves to split a validation step into
+            multiple (one step per segment). Can be a single column name, a tuple that specifies a
+            column name and its corresponding values to segment on, or a combination of both
+            (provided as a list).
+        thresholds
+            Set threshold failure levels for reporting and reacting to exceedences of the levels.
+            The thresholds are set at the step level and will override any global thresholds set in
+            `Validate(thresholds=...)`. The default is `None`, which means that no thresholds will
+            be set locally and global thresholds (if any) will take effect.
+        actions
+            Optional actions to take when the validation step meets or exceeds any set threshold
+            levels. If provided, the [`Actions`](`pointblank.Actions`) class should be used to
+            define the actions.
+        brief
+            An optional brief description of the validation step that will be displayed in the
+            reporting table. You can use the templating elements like `"{step}"` to insert
+            the step number, or `"{auto}"` to include an automatically generated brief. If `True`
+            the entire brief will be automatically generated. If `None` (the default) then there
+            won't be a brief.
+        active
+            A boolean value indicating whether the validation step should be active. Using `False`
+            will make the validation step inactive (still reporting its presence and keeping indexes
+            for the steps unchanged).
+
+        Returns
+        -------
+        Validate
+            The `Validate` object with the added validation step.
+
+        Constructing the `model` Argument
+        ---------------------------------
+        The `model=` argument should be constructed using the provider and model name separated by a
+        colon (`provider:model`). The provider text can any of:
+
+        - `"anthropic"` (Anthropic)
+        - `"openai"` (OpenAI)
+        - `"ollama"` (Ollama)
+        - `"bedrock"` (Amazon Bedrock)
+
+        The model name should be the specific model to be used from the provider. Model names are
+        subject to change so consult the provider's documentation for the most up-to-date model
+        names.
+
+        Notes on Authentication
+        -----------------------
+        API keys are automatically loaded from environment variables or `.env` files and are **not**
+        stored in the validation object for security reasons. You should consider using a secure
+        method for handling API keys.
+
+        One way to do this is to load the API key from an environment variable and retrieve it using
+        the `os` module (specifically the `os.getenv()` function). Places to store the API key might
+        include `.bashrc`, `.bash_profile`, `.zshrc`, or `.zsh_profile`.
+
+        Another solution is to store one or more model provider API keys in an `.env` file (in the
+        root of your project). If the API keys have correct names (e.g., `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` or
+        `OPENAI_API_KEY`) then the AI validation will automatically load the API key from the `.env`
+        file. An `.env` file might look like this:
+
+        ```plaintext
+        ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="your_anthropic_api_key_here"
+        OPENAI_API_KEY="your_openai_api_key_here"
+        ```
+
+        There's no need to have the `python-dotenv` package installed when using `.env` files in
+        this way.
+
+        **Provider-specific setup**:
+
+        - **OpenAI**: set `OPENAI_API_KEY` environment variable or create `.env` file
+        - **Anthropic**: set `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` environment variable or create `.env` file
+        - **Ollama**: no API key required, just ensure Ollama is running locally
+        - **Bedrock**: configure AWS credentials through standard AWS methods
+
+        AI Validation Process
+        ---------------------
+        The AI validation process works as follows:
+
+        1. data batching: the data is split into batches of the specified size
+        2. row deduplication: duplicate rows (based on selected columns) are identified and only
+        unique combinations are sent to the LLM for analysis
+        3. json conversion: each batch of unique rows is converted to JSON format for the LLM
+        4. prompt construction: the user prompt is embedded in a structured system prompt
+        5. llm processing: each batch is sent to the LLM for analysis
+        6. response parsing: LLM responses are parsed to extract validation results
+        7. result projection: results are mapped back to all original rows using row signatures
+        8. result aggregation: results from all batches are combined
+
+        **Performance Optimization**: the process uses row signature memoization to avoid redundant
+        LLM calls. When multiple rows have identical values in the selected columns, only one
+        representative row is validated, and the result is applied to all matching rows. This can
+        dramatically reduce API costs and processing time for datasets with repetitive patterns.
+
+        The LLM receives data in this JSON format:
+
+        ```json
+        {
+          "columns": ["col1", "col2", "col3"],
+          "rows": [
+            {"col1": "value1", "col2": "value2", "col3": "value3", "_pb_row_index": 0},
+            {"col1": "value4", "col2": "value5", "col3": "value6", "_pb_row_index": 1}
+          ]
+        }
+        ```
+
+        The LLM returns validation results in this format:
+        ```json
+        [
+          {"index": 0, "result": true},
+          {"index": 1, "result": false}
+        ]
+        ```
+
+        Prompt Design Tips
+        ------------------
+        For best results, design prompts that are:
+
+        - boolean-oriented: frame validation criteria to elicit clear valid/invalid responses
+        - specific: clearly define what makes a row valid/invalid
+        - unambiguous: avoid subjective language that could be interpreted differently
+        - context-aware: include relevant business rules or domain knowledge
+        - example-driven: consider providing examples in the prompt when helpful
+
+        **Critical**: Prompts must be designed so the LLM can determine whether each row passes or
+        fails the validation criteria. The system expects binary validation responses, so avoid
+        open-ended questions or prompts that might generate explanatory text instead of clear
+        pass/fail judgments.
+
+        Good prompt examples:
+
+        - "Each row should contain a valid email address in the 'email' column and a non-empty name
+        in the 'name' column"
+        - "The 'sentiment' column should contain positive sentiment words (happy, good, excellent,
+        etc.)"
+        - "Product descriptions should mention at least one technical specification"
+
+        Poor prompt examples (avoid these):
+
+        - "What do you think about this data?" (too open-ended)
+        - "Describe the quality of each row" (asks for description, not validation)
+        - "How would you improve this data?" (asks for suggestions, not pass/fail)
+
+        Performance Considerations
+        --------------------------
+        AI validation is significantly slower than traditional validation methods due to API calls
+        to LLM providers. However, performance varies dramatically based on data characteristics:
+
+        **High Memoization Scenarios** (seconds to minutes):
+
+        - data with many duplicate rows in the selected columns
+        - low cardinality data (repeated patterns)
+        - small number of unique row combinations
+
+        **Low Memoization Scenarios** (minutes to hours):
+
+        - high cardinality data with mostly unique rows
+        - large datasets with few repeated patterns
+        - all or most rows requiring individual LLM evaluation
+
+        The row signature memoization optimization can reduce processing time significantly when
+        data has repetitive patterns. For datasets where every row is unique, expect longer
+        processing times similar to validating each row individually.
+
+        **Strategies to Reduce Processing Time**:
+
+        - test on data slices: define a sampling function like `def sample_1000(df): return df.head(1000)`
+        and use `pre=sample_1000` to validate on smaller samples
+        - filter relevant data: define filter functions like `def active_only(df): return df.filter(df["status"] == "active")`
+        and use `pre=active_only` to focus on a specific subset
+        - optimize column selection: use `columns_subset=` to include only the columns necessary
+        for validation
+        - start with smaller batches: begin with `batch_size=100` for testing, then increase
+        gradually
+        - reduce concurrency: lower `max_concurrent=1` if hitting rate limits
+        - use faster/cheaper models: consider using smaller or more efficient models for initial
+        testing before switching to more capable models
+
+        Examples
+        --------
+        The following examples demonstrate how to use AI validation for different types of data
+        quality checks. These examples show both basic usage and more advanced configurations with
+        custom thresholds and actions.
+
+        **Basic AI validation example:**
+
+        This first example shows a simple validation scenario where we want to check that customer
+        records have both valid email addresses and non-empty names. Notice how we use
+        `columns_subset=` to focus only on the relevant columns, which improves both performance
+        and cost-effectiveness.
+
+        ```python
+        import pointblank as pb
+        import polars as pl
+
+        # Sample data with email and name columns
+        tbl = pl.DataFrame({
+            "email": ["john@example.com", "invalid-email", "jane@test.org"],
+            "name": ["John Doe", "", "Jane Smith"],
+            "age": [25, 30, 35]
+        })
+
+        # Validate using AI
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=tbl)
+            .prompt(
+                prompt="Each row should have a valid email address and a non-empty name",
+                columns_subset=["email", "name"],  # Only check these columns
+                model="openai:gpt-4o-mini",
+            )
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+
+        validation
+        ```
+
+        In this example, the AI will identify that the second row fails validation because it has
+        an invalid email format (`"invalid-email"`) and the third row also fails because it has an
+        empty name field. The validation results will show 2 out of 3 rows failing the criteria.
+
+        **Advanced example with custom thresholds:**
+
+        This more sophisticated example demonstrates how to use AI validation with custom thresholds
+        and actions. Here we're validating phone number formats to ensure they include area codes,
+        which is a common data quality requirement for customer contact information.
+
+        ```python
+        customer_data = pl.DataFrame({
+            "customer_id": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
+            "name": ["John Doe", "Jane Smith", "Bob Johnson", "Alice Brown", "Charlie Davis"],
+            "phone_number": [
+                "(555) 123-4567",  # Valid with area code
+                "555-987-6543",    # Valid with area code
+                "123-4567",        # Missing area code
+                "(800) 555-1234",  # Valid with area code
+                "987-6543"         # Missing area code
+            ]
+        })
+
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=customer_data)
+            .prompt(
+                prompt="Do all the phone numbers include an area code?",
+                columns_subset="phone_number",  # Only check the `phone_number` column
+                model="openai:gpt-4o",
+                batch_size=500,
+                max_concurrent=5,
+                thresholds=pb.Thresholds(warning=0.1, error=0.2, critical=0.3),
+                actions=pb.Actions(error="Too many phone numbers missing area codes.")
+            )
+            .interrogate()
+        )
+        ```
+
+        This validation will identify that 2 out of 5 phone numbers (40%) are missing area codes,
+        which exceeds all threshold levels. The validation will trigger the specified error action
+        since the failure rate (40%) is above the error threshold (20%). The AI can recognize
+        various phone number formats and determine whether they include area codes.
+        
+
 
 ## The Column Selection family
 
@@ -5867,9 +6917,12 @@ col(exprs: 'str | ColumnSelector | ColumnSelectorNarwhals') -> 'Column | ColumnL
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     If specifying a single column with certainty (you have the exact name), `col()` is not necessary
@@ -6151,9 +7204,12 @@ starts_with(text: 'str', case_sensitive: 'bool' = False) -> 'StartsWith'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `starts_with()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next
@@ -6301,9 +7357,12 @@ ends_with(text: 'str', case_sensitive: 'bool' = False) -> 'EndsWith'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `ends_with()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next section
@@ -6452,9 +7511,12 @@ contains(text: 'str', case_sensitive: 'bool' = False) -> 'Contains'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `contains()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next section
@@ -6603,9 +7665,12 @@ matches(pattern: 'str', case_sensitive: 'bool' = False) -> 'Matches'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `matches()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next section
@@ -6736,9 +7801,12 @@ everything() -> 'Everything'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `everything()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next section
@@ -6879,9 +7947,12 @@ first_n(n: 'int', offset: 'int' = 0) -> 'FirstN'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `first_n()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next section
@@ -7026,9 +8097,12 @@ last_n(n: 'int', offset: 'int' = 0) -> 'LastN'
     - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
     - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
     - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+    - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+    - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
     - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
     - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
     - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+    - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
     - [`col_exists()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_exists`)
 
     The `last_n()` selector function doesn't need to be used in isolation. Read the next section for
@@ -7392,32 +8466,134 @@ interrogate(self, collect_extracts: 'bool' = True, collect_tbl_checked: 'bool' =
         import pointblank as pb
         import polars as pl
 
-        validation = (
-            pb.Validate(data=pb.load_dataset(dataset="game_revenue"))
-            .col_vals_lt(columns="item_revenue", value=200)
-            .col_vals_gt(columns="item_revenue", value=0)
-            .col_vals_gt(columns="session_duration", value=5)
-            .col_vals_in_set(columns="item_type", set=["iap", "ad"])
-            .col_vals_regex(columns="player_id", pattern=r"[A-Z]{12}[0-9]{3}")
+        validation = (
+            pb.Validate(data=pb.load_dataset(dataset="game_revenue"))
+            .col_vals_lt(columns="item_revenue", value=200)
+            .col_vals_gt(columns="item_revenue", value=0)
+            .col_vals_gt(columns="session_duration", value=5)
+            .col_vals_in_set(columns="item_type", set=["iap", "ad"])
+            .col_vals_regex(columns="player_id", pattern=r"[A-Z]{12}[0-9]{3}")
+        )
+
+        validation.interrogate(get_first_n=10)
+        ```
+
+        The validation table shows that step 3 (checking for `session_duration` greater than `5`)
+        has 18 failing test units. This means that 18 rows in the table are problematic. We'd like
+        to see the rows that failed this validation step and we can do that with the
+        [`get_data_extracts()`](`pointblank.Validate.get_data_extracts`) method.
+
+        ```python
+        pb.preview(validation.get_data_extracts(i=3, frame=True))
+        ```
+
+        The [`get_data_extracts()`](`pointblank.Validate.get_data_extracts`) method will return a
+        Polars DataFrame here with the first 10 rows that failed the validation step (we passed that
+        into the [`preview()`](`pointblank.preview`) function for a better display). There are
+        actually 18 rows that failed but we limited the collection of extracts with
+        `get_first_n=10`.
+        
+
+set_tbl(self, tbl: 'FrameT | Any', tbl_name: 'str | None' = None, label: 'str | None' = None) -> 'Validate'
+
+        Set or replace the table associated with the Validate object.
+
+        This method allows you to replace the table associated with a Validate object with a
+        different (but presumably similar) table. This is useful when you want to apply the same
+        validation plan to multiple tables or when you have a validation workflow defined but want
+        to swap in a different data source.
+
+        Parameters
+        ----------
+        tbl
+            The table to replace the existing table with. This can be any supported table type
+            including DataFrame objects, Ibis table objects, CSV file paths, Parquet file paths,
+            GitHub URLs, or database connection strings. The same table type constraints apply as in
+            the `Validate` constructor.
+        tbl_name
+            An optional name to assign to the new input table object. If no value is provided, the
+            existing table name will be retained.
+        label
+            An optional label for the validation plan. If no value is provided, the existing label
+            will be retained.
+
+        Returns
+        -------
+        Validate
+            A new `Validate` object with the replacement table.
+
+        When to Use
+        -----------
+        The `set_tbl()` method is particularly useful in scenarios where you have:
+
+        - multiple similar tables that need the same validation checks
+        - a template validation workflow that should be applied to different data sources
+        - YAML-defined validations where you want to override the table specified in the YAML
+
+        The `set_tbl()` method creates a copy of the validation object with the new table, so the
+        original validation object remains unchanged. This allows you to reuse validation plans
+        across multiple tables without interference.
+
+        Examples
+        --------
+        We will first create two similar tables for our future validation plans.
+
+        ```python
+        import pointblank as pb
+        import polars as pl
+
+        # Create two similar tables
+        table_1 = pl.DataFrame({
+            "x": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
+            "y": [5, 4, 3, 2, 1],
+            "z": ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
+        })
+
+        table_2 = pl.DataFrame({
+            "x": [2, 4, 6, 8, 10],
+            "y": [10, 8, 6, 4, 2],
+            "z": ["f", "g", "h", "i", "j"]
+        })
+        ```
+
+        Create a validation plan with the first table.
+
+        ```python
+        validation_table_1 = (
+            pb.Validate(
+                data=table_1,
+                tbl_name="Table 1",
+                label="Validation applied to the first table"
+            )
+            .col_vals_gt(columns="x", value=0)
+            .col_vals_lt(columns="y", value=10)
         )
+        ```
 
-        validation.interrogate(get_first_n=10)
+        Now apply the same validation plan to the second table.
+
+        ```python
+        validation_table_2 = (
+            validation_table_1
+            .set_tbl(
+                tbl=table_2,
+                tbl_name="Table 2",
+                label="Validation applied to the second table"
+            )
+        )
         ```
 
-        The validation table shows that step 3 (checking for `session_duration` greater than `5`)
-        has 18 failing test units. This means that 18 rows in the table are problematic. We'd like
-        to see the rows that failed this validation step and we can do that with the
-        [`get_data_extracts()`](`pointblank.Validate.get_data_extracts`) method.
+        Here is the interrogation of the first table:
 
         ```python
-        pb.preview(validation.get_data_extracts(i=3, frame=True))
+        validation_table_1.interrogate()
         ```
 
-        The [`get_data_extracts()`](`pointblank.Validate.get_data_extracts`) method will return a
-        Polars DataFrame here with the first 10 rows that failed the validation step (we passed that
-        into the [`preview()`](`pointblank.preview`) function for a better display). There are
-        actually 18 rows that failed but we limited the collection of extracts with
-        `get_first_n=10`.
+        And the second table:
+
+        ```python
+        validation_table_2.interrogate()
+        ```
         
 
 get_tabular_report(self, title: 'str | None' = ':default:', incl_header: 'bool' = None, incl_footer: 'bool' = None) -> 'GT'
@@ -7557,11 +8733,15 @@ get_step_report(self, i: 'int', columns_subset: 'str | list[str] | Column | None
         - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
         - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
         - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+        - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+        - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
         - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
         - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
         - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+        - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
         - [`col_vals_expr()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_expr`)
         - [`conjointly()`](`pointblank.Validate.conjointly`)
+        - [`prompt()`](`pointblank.Validate.prompt`)
         - [`rows_complete()`](`pointblank.Validate.rows_complete`)
 
         The [`rows_distinct()`](`pointblank.Validate.rows_distinct`) validation step will produce a
@@ -7898,11 +9078,15 @@ get_data_extracts(self, i: 'int | list[int] | None' = None, frame: 'bool' = Fals
         - [`col_vals_outside()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_outside`)
         - [`col_vals_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_in_set`)
         - [`col_vals_not_in_set()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_in_set`)
+        - [`col_vals_increasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_increasing`)
+        - [`col_vals_decreasing()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_decreasing`)
         - [`col_vals_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_null`)
         - [`col_vals_not_null()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_not_null`)
         - [`col_vals_regex()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_regex`)
+        - [`col_vals_within_spec()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_within_spec`)
         - [`col_vals_expr()`](`pointblank.Validate.col_vals_expr`)
         - [`conjointly()`](`pointblank.Validate.conjointly`)
+        - [`prompt()`](`pointblank.Validate.prompt`)
 
         An extracted row for these validation methods means that a test unit failed for that row in
         the validation step.
@@ -9514,7 +10698,7 @@ assistant(model: 'str', data: 'FrameT | Any | None' = None, tbl_name: 'str | Non
     ----------
     model
         The model to be used. This should be in the form of `provider:model` (e.g.,
-        `"anthropic:claude-3-5-sonnet-latest"`). Supported providers are `"anthropic"`, `"openai"`,
+        `"anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5"`). Supported providers are `"anthropic"`, `"openai"`,
         `"ollama"`, and `"bedrock"`.
     data
         An optional data table to focus on during discussion with the PbA, which could be a
@@ -9894,15 +11078,46 @@ connect_to_table(connection_string: 'str') -> 'Any'
     pip install 'ibis-framework[duckdb]'    # for DuckDB
     pip install 'ibis-framework[postgres]'  # for PostgreSQL
     ```
+    See Also
+    --------
+    print_database_tables : List all available tables in a database for discovery
+    
+
+print_database_tables(connection_string: 'str') -> 'list[str]'
+
+    List all tables in a database from a connection string.
+
+    The `print_database_tables()` function connects to a database and returns a list of all
+    available tables. This is particularly useful for discovering what tables exist in a database
+    before connecting to a specific table with `connect_to_table(). The function automatically
+    filters out temporary Ibis tables (memtables) to show only user tables. It supports all database
+    backends available through Ibis, including DuckDB, SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, BigQuery, and
+    Snowflake.
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    connection_string
+        A database connection string *without* the `::table_name` suffix. Example:
+        `"duckdb:///path/to/database.ddb"`.
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    list[str]
+        List of table names, excluding temporary Ibis tables.
+
+    See Also
+    --------
+    connect_to_table : Connect to a database table with full connection string documentation
     
 
 
 ## The YAML family
 
 The *YAML* group contains functions that allow for the use of YAML to orchestrate
-validation workflows. The `yaml_interrogate()` function can be used to run a validation workflow from
-YAML strings or files. The `validate_yaml()` function checks if the YAML configuration
-passes its own validity checks.
+validation workflows. The `yaml_interrogate()` function can be used to run a validation workflow
+from YAML strings or files. The `validate_yaml()` function checks if the YAML configuration passes
+its own validity checks. The `yaml_to_python()` function converts YAML configuration to equivalent
+Python code.
 
 yaml_interrogate(yaml: 'Union[str, Path]', set_tbl: 'Union[FrameT, Any, None]' = None, namespaces: 'Optional[Union[Iterable[str], Mapping[str, str]]]' = None) -> 'Validate'
 Execute a YAML-based validation workflow.
@@ -10295,6 +11510,95 @@ Validate YAML configuration against the expected structure.
     yaml_interrogate : execute YAML-based validation workflows
     
 
+yaml_to_python(yaml: 'Union[str, Path]') -> 'str'
+Convert YAML validation configuration to equivalent Python code.
+
+    This function takes a YAML validation configuration and generates the equivalent Python code
+    that would produce the same validation workflow. This is useful for documentation, code
+    generation, or learning how to translate YAML workflows into programmatic workflows.
+
+    The generated Python code includes all necessary imports, data loading, validation steps,
+    and interrogation execution, formatted as executable Python code.
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    yaml
+        YAML configuration as string or file path. Can be: (1) a YAML string containing the
+        validation configuration, or (2) a Path object or string path to a YAML file.
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    str
+        A formatted Python code string enclosed in markdown code blocks that replicates the YAML
+        workflow. The code includes import statements, data loading, validation method calls, and
+        interrogation execution.
+
+    Raises
+    ------
+    YAMLValidationError
+        If the YAML is invalid, malformed, or contains unknown validation methods.
+
+    Examples
+    --------
+    Convert a basic YAML configuration to Python code:
+
+    ```python
+    import pointblank as pb
+
+    # Define a YAML validation workflow
+    yaml_config = '''
+    tbl: small_table
+    tbl_name: Data Quality Check
+    steps:
+    - col_vals_not_null:
+        columns: [a, b]
+    - col_vals_gt:
+        columns: [c]
+        value: 0
+    '''
+
+    # Generate equivalent Python code
+    python_code = pb.yaml_to_python(yaml_config)
+    print(python_code)
+    ```
+
+    The generated Python code shows exactly how to replicate the YAML workflow programmatically.
+    This is particularly useful when transitioning from YAML-based workflows to code-based
+    workflows, or when generating documentation that shows both YAML and Python approaches.
+
+    For more complex workflows with thresholds and metadata:
+
+    ```python
+    # Advanced YAML configuration
+    yaml_config = '''
+    tbl: small_table
+    tbl_name: Advanced Validation
+    label: Production data check
+    thresholds:
+      warning: 0.1
+      error: 0.2
+    steps:
+    - col_vals_between:
+        columns: [c]
+        left: 1
+        right: 10
+    - col_vals_regex:
+        columns: [b]
+        pattern: '[0-9]-[a-z]{3}-[0-9]{3}'
+    '''
+
+    # Generate the equivalent Python code
+    python_code = pb.yaml_to_python(yaml_config)
+    print(python_code)
+    ```
+
+    The generated code includes all configuration parameters, thresholds, and maintains the exact
+    same validation logic as the original YAML workflow.
+
+    This function is also useful for educational purposes, helping users understand how YAML
+    configurations map to the underlying Python API calls.
+    
+
 
 ## The Utility Functions family
 
@@ -10715,6 +12019,297 @@ Access validation summary information when authoring final actions.
     custom actions that are executed after all validation steps have been completed.
     
 
+write_file(validation: 'Validate', filename: 'str', path: 'str | None' = None, keep_tbl: 'bool' = False, keep_extracts: 'bool' = False, quiet: 'bool' = False) -> 'None'
+
+    Write a Validate object to disk as a serialized file.
+
+    Writing a validation object to disk with `write_file()` can be useful for keeping data
+    validation results close at hand for later retrieval (with `read_file()`). By default, any data
+    table that the validation object holds will be removed before writing to disk (not applicable if
+    no data table is present). This behavior can be changed by setting `keep_tbl=True`, but this
+    only works when the table is not of a database type (e.g., DuckDB, PostgreSQL, etc.), as
+    database connections cannot be serialized.
+
+    Extract data from failing validation steps can also be preserved by setting
+    `keep_extracts=True`, which is useful for later analysis of data quality issues.
+
+    The serialized file uses Python's pickle format for storage of the validation object state,
+    including all validation results, metadata, and optionally the source data.
+
+    **Important note.** If your validation uses custom preprocessing functions (via the `pre=`
+    parameter), these functions must be defined at the module level (not interactively or as lambda
+    functions) to ensure they can be properly restored when loading the validation in a different
+    Python session. Read the *Creating Serializable Validations* section below for more information.
+
+    :::{.callout-warning}
+    The `write_file()` function is currently experimental. Please report any issues you encounter in
+    the [Pointblank issue tracker](https://github.com/posit-dev/pointblank/issues).
+    :::
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    validation
+        The `Validate` object to write to disk.
+    filename
+        The filename to create on disk for the validation object. Should not include the file
+        extension as `.pkl` will be added automatically.
+    path
+        An optional directory path where the file should be saved. If not provided, the file will be
+        saved in the current working directory. The directory will be created if it doesn't exist.
+    keep_tbl
+        An option to keep the data table that is associated with the validation object. The default
+        is `False` where the data table is removed before writing to disk. For database tables
+        (e.g., Ibis tables with database backends), the table is always removed even if
+        `keep_tbl=True`, as database connections cannot be serialized.
+    keep_extracts
+        An option to keep any collected extract data for failing rows from validation steps. By
+        default, this is `False` (i.e., extract data is removed to save space).
+    quiet
+        Should the function not inform when the file is written? By default, this is `False`, so a
+        message will be printed when the file is successfully written.
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    None
+        This function doesn't return anything but saves the validation object to disk.
+
+    Creating Serializable Validations
+    ---------------------------------
+    To ensure your validations work reliably across different Python sessions, the recommended
+    approach is to use module-Level functions. So, create a separate Python file for your
+    preprocessing functions:
+
+    ```python
+    # preprocessing_functions.py
+    import polars as pl
+
+    def multiply_by_100(df):
+        return df.with_columns(pl.col("value") * 100)
+
+    def add_computed_column(df):
+        return df.with_columns(computed=pl.col("value") * 2 + 10)
+    ```
+
+    Then import and use them in your validation:
+
+    ```python
+    # your_main_script.py
+    import pointblank as pb
+    from preprocessing_functions import multiply_by_100, add_computed_column
+
+    validation = (
+        pb.Validate(data=my_data)
+        .col_vals_gt(columns="value", value=500, pre=multiply_by_100)
+        .col_vals_between(columns="computed", left=50, right=1000, pre=add_computed_column)
+        .interrogate()
+    )
+
+    # Save validation and it will work reliably across sessions
+    pb.write_file(validation, "my_validation", keep_tbl=True)
+    ```
+
+    ### Problematic Patterns to Avoid
+
+    Don't use lambda functions as they will cause immediate errors.
+
+    Don't use interactive function definitions (as they may fail when loading).
+
+    ```python
+    def my_function(df):  # Defined in notebook/REPL
+        return df.with_columns(pl.col("value") * 2)
+
+    validation = pb.Validate(data).col_vals_gt(
+        columns="value", value=100, pre=my_function
+    )
+    ```
+
+    ### Automatic Analysis and Guidance
+
+    When you call `write_file()`, it automatically analyzes your validation and provides:
+
+    - confirmation when all functions will work reliably
+    - warnings for functions that may cause cross-session issues
+    - clear errors for unsupported patterns (lambda functions)
+    - specific recommendations and code examples
+    - loading instructions tailored to your validation
+
+    ### Loading Your Validation
+
+    To load a saved validation in a new Python session:
+
+    ```python
+    # In a new Python session
+    import pointblank as pb
+
+    # Import the same preprocessing functions used when creating the validation
+    from preprocessing_functions import multiply_by_100, add_computed_column
+
+    # Upon loading the validation, functions will be automatically restored
+    validation = pb.read_file("my_validation.pkl")
+    ```
+
+    ** Testing Your Validation:**
+
+    To verify your validation works across sessions:
+
+    1. save your validation in one Python session
+    2. start a fresh Python session (restart kernel/interpreter)
+    3. import required preprocessing functions
+    4. load the validation using `read_file()`
+    5. test that preprocessing functions work as expected
+
+    ### Performance and Storage
+
+    - use `keep_tbl=False` (default) to reduce file size when you don't need the original data
+    - use `keep_extracts=False` (default) to save space by excluding extract data
+    - set `quiet=True` to suppress guidance messages in automated scripts
+    - files are saved using pickle's highest protocol for optimal performance
+
+    Examples
+    --------
+    Let's create a simple validation and save it to disk:
+
+    ```python
+    import pointblank as pb
+
+    # Create a validation
+    validation = (
+        pb.Validate(data=pb.load_dataset("small_table"), label="My validation")
+        .col_vals_gt(columns="d", value=100)
+        .col_vals_regex(columns="b", pattern=r"[0-9]-[a-z]{3}-[0-9]{3}")
+        .interrogate()
+    )
+
+    # Save to disk (without the original table data)
+    pb.write_file(validation, "my_validation")
+    ```
+
+    To keep the original table data for later analysis:
+
+    ```python
+    # Save with the original table data included
+    pb.write_file(validation, "my_validation_with_data", keep_tbl=True)
+    ```
+
+    You can also specify a custom directory and keep extract data:
+
+    ```python
+    pb.write_file(
+        validation,
+        filename="detailed_validation",
+        path="/path/to/validations",
+        keep_tbl=True,
+        keep_extracts=True
+    )
+    ```
+
+    ### Working with Preprocessing Functions
+
+    For validations that use preprocessing functions to be portable across sessions, define your
+    functions in a separate `.py` file:
+
+    ```python
+    # In `preprocessing_functions.py`
+
+    import polars as pl
+
+    def multiply_by_100(df):
+        return df.with_columns(pl.col("value") * 100)
+
+    def add_computed_column(df):
+        return df.with_columns(computed=pl.col("value") * 2 + 10)
+    ```
+
+    Then import and use them in your validation:
+
+    ```python
+    # In your main script
+
+    import pointblank as pb
+    from preprocessing_functions import multiply_by_100, add_computed_column
+
+    validation = (
+        pb.Validate(data=my_data)
+        .col_vals_gt(columns="value", value=500, pre=multiply_by_100)
+        .col_vals_between(columns="computed", left=50, right=1000, pre=add_computed_column)
+        .interrogate()
+    )
+
+    # This validation can now be saved and loaded reliably
+    pb.write_file(validation, "my_validation", keep_tbl=True)
+    ```
+
+    When you load this validation in a new session, simply import the preprocessing functions
+    again and they will be automatically restored.
+
+    See Also
+    --------
+    Use the [`read_file()`](`pointblank.read_file`) function to load a validation object that was
+    previously saved with `write_file()`.
+    
+
+read_file(filepath: 'str | Path') -> 'Validate'
+
+    Read a Validate object from disk that was previously saved with `write_file()`.
+
+    This function loads a validation object that was previously serialized to disk using the
+    `write_file()` function. The validation object will be restored with all its validation results,
+    metadata, and optionally the source data (if it was saved with `keep_tbl=True`).
+
+    :::{.callout-warning}
+    The `read_file()` function is currently experimental. Please report any issues you encounter in
+    the [Pointblank issue tracker](https://github.com/posit-dev/pointblank/issues).
+    :::
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    filepath
+        The path to the saved validation file. Can be a string or Path object.
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    Validate
+        The restored validation object with all its original state, validation results, and
+        metadata.
+
+    Examples
+    --------
+    Load a validation object that was previously saved:
+
+    ```python
+    import pointblank as pb
+
+    # Load a validation object from disk
+    validation = pb.read_file("my_validation.pkl")
+
+    # View the validation results
+    validation
+    ```
+
+    You can also load using just the filename (without extension):
+
+    ```python
+    # This will automatically look for "my_validation.pkl"
+    validation = pb.read_file("my_validation")
+    ```
+
+    The loaded validation object retains all its functionality:
+
+    ```python
+    # Get validation summary
+    summary = validation.get_json_report()
+
+    # Get sundered data (if original table was saved)
+    if validation.data is not None:
+        failing_rows = validation.get_sundered_data(type="fail")
+    ```
+
+    See Also
+    --------
+    Use the [`write_file()`](`pointblank.Validate.write_file`) method to save a validation object
+    to disk for later retrieval with this function.
+    
+
 config(report_incl_header: 'bool' = True, report_incl_footer: 'bool' = True, preview_incl_header: 'bool' = True) -> 'PointblankConfig'
 
     Configuration settings for the Pointblank library.