odoo-addon-base-tier-validation 17.0.2.2.1__py3-none-any.whl → 17.0.2.3.0.2__py3-none-any.whl

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/models/tier_definition.py

@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ class TierDefinition(models.Model):
             ("field", "Field in related record"),
         ],
     )
+    allow_write_for_reviewer = fields.Boolean(
+        string="Allow Write For Reviewers",
+        default=False,
+    )
     reviewer_id = fields.Many2one(comodel_name="res.users", string="Reviewer")
     reviewer_group_id = fields.Many2one(
         comodel_name="res.groups", string="Reviewer group"
@@ -90,6 +94,11 @@ class TierDefinition(models.Model):
         "to this definition are restarted.",
     )
     has_comment = fields.Boolean(string="Comment", default=False)
+    notify_reminder_delay = fields.Integer(
+        string="Send reminder message on pending reviews",
+        help="Number of days after which a message must be posted to remind about "
+        "pending validation  (0 = no reminder)",
+    )
     approve_sequence = fields.Boolean(
         string="Approve by sequence",
         default=False,
@@ -113,3 +122,33 @@ class TierDefinition(models.Model):
                 .sudo()
                 .search([("model", "=", rec.model), ("relation", "=", "res.users")])
             )
+
+    def _get_review_needing_reminder(self):
+        """Return all the reviews that have the reminder setup."""
+        self.ensure_one()
+        if not self.notify_reminder_delay:
+            return self.env["tier.review"]
+        review_date = fields.Datetime.subtract(
+            fields.Datetime.now(), days=self.notify_reminder_delay
+        )
+        return self.env["tier.review"].search(
+            [
+                ("definition_id", "=", self.id),
+                ("status", "in", ["waiting", "pending"]),
+                "|",
+                "&",
+                ("create_date", "<", review_date),
+                ("last_reminder_date", "=", False),
+                ("last_reminder_date", "<", review_date),
+            ],
+            limit=1,
+        )
+
+    def _cron_send_review_reminder(self):
+        definition_with_reminder = self.env["tier.definition"].search(
+            [("notify_reminder_delay", ">", 0)]
+        )
+        for record in definition_with_reminder:
+            review_to_remind = record._get_review_needing_reminder()
+            if review_to_remind:
+                review_to_remind._send_review_reminder()

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/models/tier_review.py

@@ -1,11 +1,15 @@
 # Copyright 2017-19 ForgeFlow S.L. (https://www.forgeflow.com)
 # License AGPL-3.0 or later (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl).
 
+import logging
+
 import pytz
 
 from odoo import _, api, fields, models
 from odoo.exceptions import ValidationError
 
+_logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
 
 class TierReview(models.Model):
     _name = "tier.review"
@@ -65,6 +69,7 @@ class TierReview(models.Model):
     approve_sequence_bypass = fields.Boolean(
         related="definition_id.approve_sequence_bypass", readonly=True
     )
+    last_reminder_date = fields.Datetime(readonly=True)
 
     @api.depends("status")
     def _compute_display_status(self):
@@ -159,3 +164,38 @@ class TierReview(models.Model):
         """Method to call and reuse abstract notification method"""
         resource = self.env[self.model].browse(self.res_id)
         resource._notify_review_available(review_ids)
+
+    def _get_reminder_notification_subtype(self):
+        return "base_tier_validation.mt_tier_validation_reminder"
+
+    def _get_reminder_activity_type(self):
+        return "base_tier_validation.mail_act_tier_validation_reminder"
+
+    def _notify_review_reminder_body(self):
+        delay = (fields.Datetime.now() - self.create_date).days
+        return _("A review has been requested %s days ago.") % (delay)
+
+    def _send_review_reminder(self):
+        record = self.env[self.model].browse(self.res_id)
+        # Only schedule activity if reviewer is a single user and model has activities
+        if len(self.reviewer_ids) == 1 and hasattr(record, "activity_ids"):
+            self._schedule_review_reminder_activity(record)
+        elif hasattr(record, "message_post"):
+            self._notify_review_reminder(record)
+        else:
+            msg = "Could not send reminder for record %s" % record
+            _logger.exception(msg)
+        self.last_reminder_date = fields.Datetime.now()
+
+    def _notify_review_reminder(self, record):
+        record.message_post(
+            subtype_xmlid=self._get_reminder_notification_subtype(),
+            body=self._notify_review_reminder_body(),
+        )
+
+    def _schedule_review_reminder_activity(self, record):
+        record.activity_schedule(
+            act_type_xmlid=self._get_reminder_activity_type(),
+            note=self._notify_review_reminder_body(),
+            user_id=self.reviewer_ids.id,
+        )

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/models/tier_validation.py

@@ -128,19 +128,25 @@ class TierValidation(models.AbstractModel):
     def _search_validated(self, operator, value):
         assert operator in ("=", "!="), "Invalid domain operator"
         assert value in (True, False), "Invalid domain value"
-        pos = self.search(
-            [(self._state_field, "in", self._state_from), ("review_ids", "!=", False)]
-        ).filtered(lambda r: r.validated == value)
-        return [("id", "in", pos.ids)]
+        pos = self.search([(self._state_field, "in", self._state_from)]).filtered(
+            lambda r: r.validated
+        )
+        if value:
+            return [("id", "in", pos.ids)]
+        else:
+            return [("id", "not in", pos.ids)]
 
     @api.model
     def _search_rejected(self, operator, value):
         assert operator in ("=", "!="), "Invalid domain operator"
         assert value in (True, False), "Invalid domain value"
-        pos = self.search(
-            [(self._state_field, "in", self._state_from), ("review_ids", "!=", False)]
-        ).filtered(lambda r: r.rejected == value)
-        return [("id", "in", pos.ids)]
+        pos = self.search([(self._state_field, "in", self._state_from)]).filtered(
+            lambda r: r.rejected
+        )
+        if value:
+            return [("id", "in", pos.ids)]
+        else:
+            return [("id", "not in", pos.ids)]
 
     @api.model
     def _search_reviewer_ids(self, operator, value):
@@ -304,7 +310,13 @@ class TierValidation(models.AbstractModel):
 
     def _check_allow_write_under_validation(self, vals):
         """Allow to add exceptions for fields that are allowed to be written
-        even when the record is under validation."""
+        or for reviewers for all fields, even when the record is under
+        validation."""
+        if (
+            all(self.review_ids.mapped("definition_id.allow_write_for_reviewer"))
+            and self.env.user in self.reviewer_ids
+        ):
+            return True
         exceptions = self._get_under_validation_exceptions()
         for val in vals:
             if val not in exceptions:
@@ -341,6 +353,15 @@ class TierValidation(models.AbstractModel):
                 allowed_field_names.append(fld_data["string"])
         return allowed_field_names, not_allowed_field_names
 
+    def _check_tier_state_transition(self, vals):
+        """
+        Check we are in origin state and not destination state
+        """
+        self.ensure_one()
+        return getattr(self, self._state_field) in self._state_from and vals.get(
+            self._state_field
+        ) not in (self._state_to + [self._cancel_state])
+
     def write(self, vals):
         self._tier_validation_check_state_on_write(vals)
         self._tier_validation_check_write_allowed(vals)
@@ -382,11 +403,16 @@ class TierValidation(models.AbstractModel):
                     reviews = rec.request_validation()
                     rec._validate_tier(reviews)
                     if not self._calc_reviews_validated(reviews):
+                        pending_reviews = reviews.filtered(
+                            lambda r: r.status == "pending"
+                        ).mapped("name")
                         raise ValidationError(
                             _(
                                 "This action needs to be validated for at least "
-                                "one record. \nPlease request a validation."
+                                "one record. Reviews pending:\n - %s "
+                                "\nPlease request a validation."
                             )
+                            % "\n - ".join(pending_reviews)
                         )
                 if rec.review_ids and not rec.validated:
                     raise ValidationError(
@@ -401,9 +427,7 @@ class TierValidation(models.AbstractModel):
             # Write under validation
             if (
                 rec.review_ids
-                and getattr(rec, self._state_field) in self._state_from
-                and vals.get(self._state_field)
-                not in (self._state_to + [self._cancel_state])
+                and rec._check_tier_state_transition(vals)
                 and not rec._check_allow_write_under_validation(vals)
                 and not rec._context.get("skip_validation_check")
             ):

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/security/ir.model.access.csv

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ access_tier_review_group_portal,access_tier_review_group_portal,model_tier_revie
 access_tier_definition_group_portal,access_tier_definition_group_portal,model_tier_definition,base.group_portal,1,0,0,0
 access_tier_review,access.tier.review,model_tier_review,base.group_user,1,1,1,1
 access_tier_definition_all,tier.definition.all,model_tier_definition,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
-access_tier_definition_settings,tier.definition.settings,model_tier_definition,base.group_system,1,1,1,1
+access_tier_definition_settings,tier.definition.settings,model_tier_definition,base.group_erp_manager,1,1,1,1
 access_comment_wizard,access.comment.wizard,model_comment_wizard,base.group_user,1,1,1,1
 access_tier_validation_exceptions_all,tier.validation.exceptions,model_tier_validation_exception,,1,0,0,0
 access_tier_validation_exceptions_settings,tier.validation.exceptions,model_tier_validation_exception,base.group_system,1,1,1,1

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/static/description/index.html

@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ ul.auto-toc {
 !! This file is generated by oca-gen-addon-readme !!
 !! changes will be overwritten.                   !!
 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-!! source digest: sha256:1d286dc389232f0cc60fd6012ae72c5eaf918284c9e7ef73da914cd6691cf822
+!! source digest: sha256:9d45fb0cb0dd64489508d2963bbd948c59b466f16618469b6e86e3d606511aeb
 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -->
 <p><a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://odoo-community.org/page/development-status"><img alt="Mature" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/maturity-Mature-brightgreen.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html"><img alt="License: AGPL-3" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/licence-AGPL--3-blue.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://github.com/OCA/server-ux/tree/17.0/base_tier_validation"><img alt="OCA/server-ux" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/github-OCA%2Fserver--ux-lightgray.png?logo=github" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/server-ux-17-0/server-ux-17-0-base_tier_validation"><img alt="Translate me on Weblate" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/weblate-Translate%20me-F47D42.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://runboat.odoo-community.org/builds?repo=OCA/server-ux&amp;target_branch=17.0"><img alt="Try me on Runboat" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/runboat-Try%20me-875A7B.png" /></a></p>
 <p>Validating some operations is a common need across different areas in a
@@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ functionality.</li>
 be notified by email when this definition is triggered.</li>
 <li>If check <em>Notify reviewers on reaching pending</em> if you want to send a
 notification when pending status is reached. This is usefull in a
-approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is
-their turn in the sequence.</li>
+approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is their
+turn in the sequence.</li>
 <li>If check <em>Comment</em>, reviewers can comment after click Validate or
 Reject.</li>
 <li>If check <em>Approve by sequence</em>, reviewers is forced to review by
@@ -455,12 +455,10 @@ both.</li>
 <ul class="simple">
 <li>If you don’t create any exception, the Validated record will be
 readonly and cannot be modified.</li>
-<li>If check <em>Write under Validation</em>, records will be able to be
-modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
-ongoing.</li>
-<li>If check <em>Write after Validation</em>, records will be able to be
-modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
-finished.</li>
+<li>If check <em>Write under Validation</em>, records will be able to be modified
+only in the defined fields when the Validation process is ongoing.</li>
+<li>If check <em>Write after Validation</em>, records will be able to be modified
+only in the defined fields when the Validation process is finished.</li>
 <li>If check <em>Write after Validation</em> and <em>Write under Validation</em>,
 records will be able to be modified defined fields always.</li>
 </ul>
@@ -471,8 +469,8 @@ records will be able to be modified defined fields always.</li>
 improvement will be very valuable.</p>
 <ul>
 <li><p class="first"><strong>Issue:</strong></p>
-<p>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
-be inconsistencies in the systray notifications.</p>
+<p>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
+inconsistencies in the systray notifications.</p>
 <p><strong>Description:</strong></p>
 <p>Field can_review in tier.review is used to filter out, in the systray
 notifications, the reviews a user can approve. This can_review field
@@ -504,8 +502,8 @@ to validate.</p>
 <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#toc-entry-6">13.0.1.2.2 (2020-08-30)</a></h2>
 <p>Fixes:</p>
 <ul class="simple">
-<li>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
-be inconsistencies in the systray notifications</li>
+<li>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
+inconsistencies in the systray notifications</li>
 <li>When using approve_sequence, still not approve only the needed
 sequence, but also other sequence for the same approver</li>
 </ul>

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/tests/__init__.py

@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 
 from . import common
 from . import test_tier_validation
+from . import test_tier_validation_reminder

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/tests/common.py

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ class CommonTierValidation(common.TransactionCase):
 
         # Create tier definitions:
         cls.tier_def_obj = cls.env["tier.definition"]
-        cls.tier_def_obj.create(
+        cls.tier_definition = cls.tier_def_obj.create(
             {
                 "model_id": cls.tester_model.id,
                 "review_type": "individual",

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/tests/test_tier_validation.py

@@ -999,6 +999,17 @@ class TierTierValidation(CommonTierValidation):
         self.assertFalse(self.test_record_computed.review_ids)
         self.test_record_computed.invalidate_recordset()
 
+    def test_27_allow_write_for_reviewers(self):
+        reviews = self.test_record.with_user(self.test_user_2.id).request_validation()
+        record = self.test_record.with_user(self.test_user_1.id)
+        record.invalidate_recordset()
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            record.with_user(self.test_user_1.id).write({"test_field": 0.3})
+        reviews.definition_id.with_user(self.test_user_1.id).write(
+            {"allow_write_for_reviewer": True}
+        )
+        record.with_user(self.test_user_1.id).write({"test_field": 0.3})
+
 
 @tagged("at_install")
 class TierTierValidationView(CommonTierValidation):

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/tests/test_tier_validation_reminder.py

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Copyright 2018-19 ForgeFlow S.L. (https://www.forgeflow.com)
+# License LGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html).
+
+from freezegun import freeze_time
+
+from odoo import fields
+from odoo.tests.common import tagged
+
+from .common import CommonTierValidation
+
+
+@tagged("post_install", "-at_install")
+class TierTierValidation(CommonTierValidation):
+    def test_validation_reminder(self):
+        """Check the posting of reminder to reviews."""
+        tier_definition = self.tier_definition
+        tier_definition.notify_reminder_delay = 3
+
+        # Request a review today
+        self.test_record.with_user(self.test_user_2.id).request_validation()
+        review = self.env["tier.review"].search(
+            [("definition_id", "=", tier_definition.id)]
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(review)
+        self.assertEqual(review.last_reminder_date, False)
+
+        # 2 days later no reminder should be posted
+        in_2_days = fields.Datetime.add(fields.Datetime.now(), days=2)
+        with freeze_time(in_2_days):
+            tier_definition._cron_send_review_reminder()
+        self.assertEqual(review.last_reminder_date, False)
+        # 4 days later first reminder
+        in_4_days = fields.Datetime.add(fields.Datetime.now(), days=4)
+        with freeze_time(in_4_days):
+            self.tier_definition._cron_send_review_reminder()
+        self.assertEqual(review.last_reminder_date, in_4_days)
+        # 5 days later no new reminder
+        in_6_days = fields.Datetime.add(fields.Datetime.now(), days=6)
+        with freeze_time(in_6_days):
+            self.tier_definition._cron_send_review_reminder()
+        self.assertEqual(review.last_reminder_date, in_4_days)
+        # 9 days later second reminder
+        in_9_days = fields.Datetime.add(fields.Datetime.now(), days=9)
+        with freeze_time(in_9_days):
+            self.tier_definition._cron_send_review_reminder()
+        self.assertEqual(review.last_reminder_date, in_9_days)

odoo/addons/base_tier_validation/views/tier_definition_view.xml

@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
                             <field name="model_id" options="{'no_create': True}" />
                             <field name="model" invisible="1" />
                             <field name="review_type" />
+                            <field name="allow_write_for_reviewer" />
                             <field
                                 name="reviewer_id"
                                 invisible="review_type != 'individual'"
@@ -117,6 +118,7 @@
                                     <field name="notify_on_rejected" />
                                     <field name="notify_on_restarted" />
                                     <field name="has_comment" />
+                                    <field name="notify_reminder_delay" />
                                 </group>
                             </group>
                         </page>

{odoo_addon_base_tier_validation-17.0.2.2.1.dist-info → odoo_addon_base_tier_validation-17.0.2.3.0.2.dist-info}/METADATA

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.1
 Name: odoo-addon-base_tier_validation
-Version: 17.0.2.2.1
+Version: 17.0.2.3.0.2
 Requires-Python: >=3.10
 Requires-Dist: odoo>=17.0a,<17.1dev
 Summary: Implement a validation process based on tiers.
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Base Tier Validation
    !! This file is generated by oca-gen-addon-readme !!
    !! changes will be overwritten.                   !!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-   !! source digest: sha256:1d286dc389232f0cc60fd6012ae72c5eaf918284c9e7ef73da914cd6691cf822
+   !! source digest: sha256:9d45fb0cb0dd64489508d2963bbd948c59b466f16618469b6e86e3d606511aeb
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 .. |badge1| image:: https://img.shields.io/badge/maturity-Mature-brightgreen.png
@@ -82,16 +82,16 @@ To configure this module, you need to:
 
 **Note:**
 
--  If check *Notify Reviewers on Creation*, all possible reviewers will
-   be notified by email when this definition is triggered.
--  If check *Notify reviewers on reaching pending* if you want to send a
-   notification when pending status is reached. This is usefull in a
-   approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is
-   their turn in the sequence.
--  If check *Comment*, reviewers can comment after click Validate or
-   Reject.
--  If check *Approve by sequence*, reviewers is forced to review by
-   specified sequence.
+- If check *Notify Reviewers on Creation*, all possible reviewers will
+  be notified by email when this definition is triggered.
+- If check *Notify reviewers on reaching pending* if you want to send a
+  notification when pending status is reached. This is usefull in a
+  approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is their
+  turn in the sequence.
+- If check *Comment*, reviewers can comment after click Validate or
+  Reject.
+- If check *Approve by sequence*, reviewers is forced to review by
+  specified sequence.
 
 To configure Tier Validation Exceptions, you need to:
 
@@ -106,16 +106,14 @@ To configure Tier Validation Exceptions, you need to:
 
 **Note:**
 
--  If you don't create any exception, the Validated record will be
-   readonly and cannot be modified.
--  If check *Write under Validation*, records will be able to be
-   modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
-   ongoing.
--  If check *Write after Validation*, records will be able to be
-   modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
-   finished.
--  If check *Write after Validation* and *Write under Validation*,
-   records will be able to be modified defined fields always.
+- If you don't create any exception, the Validated record will be
+  readonly and cannot be modified.
+- If check *Write under Validation*, records will be able to be modified
+  only in the defined fields when the Validation process is ongoing.
+- If check *Write after Validation*, records will be able to be modified
+  only in the defined fields when the Validation process is finished.
+- If check *Write after Validation* and *Write under Validation*,
+  records will be able to be modified defined fields always.
 
 Known issues / Roadmap
 ======================
@@ -123,25 +121,25 @@ Known issues / Roadmap
 This is the list of known issues for this module. Any proposal for
 improvement will be very valuable.
 
--  **Issue:**
+- **Issue:**
 
-   When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
-   be inconsistencies in the systray notifications.
+  When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
+  inconsistencies in the systray notifications.
 
-   **Description:**
+  **Description:**
 
-   Field can_review in tier.review is used to filter out, in the systray
-   notifications, the reviews a user can approve. This can_review field
-   is updated **in the database** in method review_user_count, this can
-   make it very inconsistent for databases with a lot of users and
-   recurring updates that can change the expected behavior.
+  Field can_review in tier.review is used to filter out, in the systray
+  notifications, the reviews a user can approve. This can_review field
+  is updated **in the database** in method review_user_count, this can
+  make it very inconsistent for databases with a lot of users and
+  recurring updates that can change the expected behavior.
 
--  **Migration to 15.0:**
+- **Migration to 15.0:**
 
-   The parameter \_tier_validation_manual_config will become False, on
-   14.0, the default value is True, as the change is applied after the
-   migration. In order to use the new behavior we need to modify the
-   value on our expected model.
+  The parameter \_tier_validation_manual_config will become False, on
+  14.0, the default value is True, as the change is applied after the
+  migration. In order to use the new behavior we need to modify the
+  value on our expected model.
 
 Changelog
 =========
@@ -163,69 +161,69 @@ Migrated to Odoo 14.
 
 Fixes:
 
--  When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
-   be inconsistencies in the systray notifications
--  When using approve_sequence, still not approve only the needed
-   sequence, but also other sequence for the same approver
+- When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
+  inconsistencies in the systray notifications
+- When using approve_sequence, still not approve only the needed
+  sequence, but also other sequence for the same approver
 
 12.0.3.3.1 (2019-12-02)
 -----------------------
 
 Fixes:
 
--  Show comment on Reviews Table.
--  Edit notification with approve_sequence.
+- Show comment on Reviews Table.
+- Edit notification with approve_sequence.
 
 12.0.3.3.0 (2019-11-27)
 -----------------------
 
 New features:
 
--  Add comment on Reviews Table.
--  Approve by sequence.
+- Add comment on Reviews Table.
+- Approve by sequence.
 
 12.0.3.2.1 (2019-11-26)
 -----------------------
 
 Fixes:
 
--  Remove message_subscribe_users
+- Remove message_subscribe_users
 
 12.0.3.2.0 (2019-11-25)
 -----------------------
 
 New features:
 
--  Notify reviewers
+- Notify reviewers
 
 12.0.3.1.0 (2019-07-08)
 -----------------------
 
 Fixes:
 
--  Singleton error
+- Singleton error
 
 12.0.3.0.0 (2019-12-02)
 -----------------------
 
 Fixes:
 
--  Edit Reviews Table
+- Edit Reviews Table
 
 12.0.2.1.0 (2019-05-29)
 -----------------------
 
 Fixes:
 
--  Edit drop-down style width and position
+- Edit drop-down style width and position
 
 12.0.2.0.0 (2019-05-28)
 -----------------------
 
 New features:
 
--  Pass parameters as functions.
--  Add Systray.
+- Pass parameters as functions.
+- Add Systray.
 
 12.0.1.0.0 (2019-02-18)
 -----------------------
@@ -268,24 +266,24 @@ Authors
 Contributors
 ------------
 
--  Lois Rilo <lois.rilo@forgeflow.com>
--  Naglis Jonaitis <naglis@versada.eu>
--  Adrià Gil Sorribes <adria.gil@forgeflow.com>
--  Pimolnat Suntian <pimolnats@ecosoft.co.th>
--  Pedro Gonzalez <pedro.gonzalez@pesol.es>
--  Kitti U. <kittiu@ecosoft.co.th>
--  Saran Lim. <saranl@ecosoft.co.th>
--  Carlos Lopez <celm1990@gmail.com>
--  Javier Colmeiro <javier.colmeiro@braintec.com>
--  bosd
--  Evan Soh <evan.soh@omnisoftsolution.com>
--  Manuel Regidor <manuel.regidor@sygel.es>
--  Eduardo de Miguel <edu@moduon.team>
--  `XCG Consulting <https://xcg-consulting.fr>`__:
-
-   -  Houzéfa Abbasbhay
-
--  Stefan Rijnhart <stefan@opener.amsterdam>
+- Lois Rilo <lois.rilo@forgeflow.com>
+- Naglis Jonaitis <naglis@versada.eu>
+- Adrià Gil Sorribes <adria.gil@forgeflow.com>
+- Pimolnat Suntian <pimolnats@ecosoft.co.th>
+- Pedro Gonzalez <pedro.gonzalez@pesol.es>
+- Kitti U. <kittiu@ecosoft.co.th>
+- Saran Lim. <saranl@ecosoft.co.th>
+- Carlos Lopez <celm1990@gmail.com>
+- Javier Colmeiro <javier.colmeiro@braintec.com>
+- bosd
+- Evan Soh <evan.soh@omnisoftsolution.com>
+- Manuel Regidor <manuel.regidor@sygel.es>
+- Eduardo de Miguel <edu@moduon.team>
+- `XCG Consulting <https://xcg-consulting.fr>`__:
+
+  - Houzéfa Abbasbhay
+
+- Stefan Rijnhart <stefan@opener.amsterdam>
 
 Maintainers
 -----------