monoco-toolkit 0.3.9__py3-none-any.whl → 0.3.10__py3-none-any.whl
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- monoco/core/config.py +7 -0
- monoco/core/hooks/builtin/git_cleanup.py +1 -1
- monoco/core/injection.py +63 -29
- monoco/core/integrations.py +2 -2
- monoco/core/output.py +5 -5
- monoco/core/registry.py +7 -1
- monoco/core/resource/__init__.py +5 -0
- monoco/core/resource/finder.py +98 -0
- monoco/core/resource/manager.py +91 -0
- monoco/core/resource/models.py +35 -0
- monoco/core/resources/en/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_core/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/core/resources/zh/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_core/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/core/skill_framework.py +292 -0
- monoco/core/skills.py +471 -371
- monoco/core/sync.py +73 -1
- monoco/core/workflow_converter.py +420 -0
- monoco/features/agent/__init__.py +2 -2
- monoco/features/agent/adapter.py +31 -0
- monoco/features/agent/apoptosis.py +44 -0
- monoco/features/agent/cli.py +101 -144
- monoco/features/agent/config.py +35 -21
- monoco/features/agent/defaults.py +6 -49
- monoco/features/agent/engines.py +32 -6
- monoco/features/agent/manager.py +6 -1
- monoco/features/agent/models.py +2 -2
- monoco/features/agent/resources/atoms/atom-code-dev.yaml +61 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/atoms/atom-issue-lifecycle.yaml +73 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/atoms/atom-knowledge.yaml +55 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/atoms/atom-review.yaml +60 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/en/skills/flow_engineer/SKILL.md +94 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/en/skills/flow_manager/SKILL.md +93 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/en/skills/flow_planner/SKILL.md +85 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/en/skills/flow_reviewer/SKILL.md +114 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/roles/role-engineer.yaml +49 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/roles/role-manager.yaml +46 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/roles/role-planner.yaml +46 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/roles/role-reviewer.yaml +47 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/workflows/workflow-dev.yaml +83 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/workflows/workflow-issue-create.yaml +72 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/workflows/workflow-review.yaml +94 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/zh/skills/flow_planner/SKILL.md +259 -0
- monoco/features/agent/resources/zh/skills/flow_reviewer/SKILL.md +137 -0
- monoco/features/agent/worker.py +38 -2
- monoco/features/glossary/__init__.py +0 -0
- monoco/features/glossary/adapter.py +31 -0
- monoco/features/glossary/config.py +5 -0
- monoco/features/glossary/resources/en/AGENTS.md +29 -0
- monoco/features/glossary/resources/en/skills/monoco_glossary/SKILL.md +35 -0
- monoco/features/glossary/resources/zh/AGENTS.md +29 -0
- monoco/features/glossary/resources/zh/skills/monoco_glossary/SKILL.md +35 -0
- monoco/features/i18n/resources/en/skills/i18n_scan_workflow/SKILL.md +105 -0
- monoco/features/i18n/resources/en/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_i18n/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/features/i18n/resources/zh/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_i18n/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/features/issue/core.py +45 -6
- monoco/features/issue/engine/machine.py +5 -2
- monoco/features/issue/models.py +1 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/en/skills/issue_create_workflow/SKILL.md +167 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/en/skills/issue_develop_workflow/SKILL.md +224 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/en/skills/issue_lifecycle_workflow/SKILL.md +159 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/en/skills/issue_refine_workflow/SKILL.md +203 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/en/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_issue/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/zh/skills/issue_create_workflow/SKILL.md +167 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/zh/skills/issue_develop_workflow/SKILL.md +224 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/zh/skills/issue_refine_workflow/SKILL.md +203 -0
- monoco/features/issue/resources/zh/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_issue/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/features/memo/resources/en/skills/monoco_memo/SKILL.md +77 -0
- monoco/features/memo/resources/en/skills/note_processing_workflow/SKILL.md +140 -0
- monoco/features/memo/resources/zh/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_memo/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/features/spike/resources/en/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_spike/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco/features/spike/resources/en/skills/research_workflow/SKILL.md +121 -0
- monoco/features/spike/resources/zh/{SKILL.md → skills/monoco_spike/SKILL.md} +2 -0
- monoco_toolkit-0.3.10.dist-info/METADATA +124 -0
- monoco_toolkit-0.3.10.dist-info/RECORD +156 -0
- monoco/features/agent/reliability.py +0 -106
- monoco/features/agent/resources/skills/flow_reviewer/SKILL.md +0 -114
- monoco_toolkit-0.3.9.dist-info/METADATA +0 -127
- monoco_toolkit-0.3.9.dist-info/RECORD +0 -115
- /monoco/features/agent/resources/{skills → zh/skills}/flow_engineer/SKILL.md +0 -0
- /monoco/features/agent/resources/{skills → zh/skills}/flow_manager/SKILL.md +0 -0
- /monoco/features/i18n/resources/{skills → zh/skills}/i18n_scan_workflow/SKILL.md +0 -0
- /monoco/features/issue/resources/{skills → zh/skills}/issue_lifecycle_workflow/SKILL.md +0 -0
- /monoco/features/memo/resources/{skills → zh/skills}/note_processing_workflow/SKILL.md +0 -0
- /monoco/features/spike/resources/{skills → zh/skills}/research_workflow/SKILL.md +0 -0
- {monoco_toolkit-0.3.9.dist-info → monoco_toolkit-0.3.10.dist-info}/WHEEL +0 -0
- {monoco_toolkit-0.3.9.dist-info → monoco_toolkit-0.3.10.dist-info}/entry_points.txt +0 -0
- {monoco_toolkit-0.3.9.dist-info → monoco_toolkit-0.3.10.dist-info}/licenses/LICENSE +0 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: atom-issue-lifecycle
|
|
3
|
+
type: atom
|
|
4
|
+
domain: issue
|
|
5
|
+
description: Issue 生命周期管理的原子操作 - 创建、启动、提交、关闭工作单元
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
author: Monoco Toolkit
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# 系统级合规规则(定义一次,全局生效)
|
|
10
|
+
compliance_rules:
|
|
11
|
+
- rule: "禁止在 main/master 分支直接修改代码"
|
|
12
|
+
severity: error
|
|
13
|
+
check: "git branch --show-current"
|
|
14
|
+
fail_if: "main|master"
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
- rule: "必须使用 feature 分支进行开发"
|
|
17
|
+
severity: error
|
|
18
|
+
command: "monoco issue start <ID> --branch"
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- rule: "提交前必须通过 lint 检查"
|
|
21
|
+
severity: error
|
|
22
|
+
command: "monoco issue lint"
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- rule: "每个 Issue 必须至少包含 2 个 Checkbox"
|
|
25
|
+
severity: error
|
|
26
|
+
check: "checkbox_count >= 2"
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- rule: "Review/Done 阶段必须包含 Review Comments"
|
|
29
|
+
severity: warning
|
|
30
|
+
check: "review_comments_section exists"
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
# 原子操作定义
|
|
33
|
+
operations:
|
|
34
|
+
- name: create
|
|
35
|
+
description: 创建新的 Issue 工作单元
|
|
36
|
+
command: "monoco issue create <type> -t <title>"
|
|
37
|
+
reminder: "选择合适的类型 (epic/feature/chore/fix),编写清晰的描述"
|
|
38
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
39
|
+
- "必须包含至少 2 个 Checkbox"
|
|
40
|
+
- "标题必须与 Front Matter 一致"
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- name: start
|
|
43
|
+
description: 启动开发,创建功能分支
|
|
44
|
+
command: "monoco issue start <ID> --branch"
|
|
45
|
+
reminder: "确保使用 --branch 创建功能分支,禁止在 main/master 上开发"
|
|
46
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
47
|
+
- "禁止在 main/master 分支直接修改代码"
|
|
48
|
+
- "必须创建 feature 分支"
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
- name: sync
|
|
51
|
+
description: 同步文件追踪,记录修改的文件
|
|
52
|
+
command: "monoco issue sync-files"
|
|
53
|
+
reminder: "定期同步文件追踪,保持 Issue 与代码变更同步"
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
- name: lint
|
|
56
|
+
description: 检查 Issue 合规性
|
|
57
|
+
command: "monoco issue lint"
|
|
58
|
+
reminder: "提交前必须运行 lint 检查"
|
|
59
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
60
|
+
- "必须通过所有合规检查"
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
- name: submit
|
|
63
|
+
description: 提交代码进行评审
|
|
64
|
+
command: "monoco issue submit <ID>"
|
|
65
|
+
reminder: "确保所有测试通过,lint 无错误后再提交"
|
|
66
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
67
|
+
- "所有单元测试必须通过"
|
|
68
|
+
- "必须通过 lint 检查"
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
- name: close
|
|
71
|
+
description: 关闭 Issue,清理环境
|
|
72
|
+
command: "monoco issue close <ID> --solution completed --prune"
|
|
73
|
+
reminder: "代码合并后及时关闭 Issue,清理 feature 分支"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: atom-knowledge
|
|
3
|
+
type: atom
|
|
4
|
+
domain: knowledge
|
|
5
|
+
description: 知识管理的原子操作 - 捕获、处理、转化、归档
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
author: Monoco Toolkit
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# 系统级合规规则
|
|
10
|
+
compliance_rules:
|
|
11
|
+
- rule: "Memo 是临时的,不应无限堆积"
|
|
12
|
+
severity: warning
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
- rule: "可执行的想法必须转为 Issue 追踪"
|
|
15
|
+
severity: error
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
# 原子操作定义
|
|
18
|
+
operations:
|
|
19
|
+
- name: capture
|
|
20
|
+
description: 快速捕获 fleeting ideas
|
|
21
|
+
command: "monoco memo add <content>"
|
|
22
|
+
reminder: "保持简洁,不中断当前工作流,添加上下文"
|
|
23
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
24
|
+
- "使用简洁的描述"
|
|
25
|
+
- "添加上下文(-c file:line 如适用)"
|
|
26
|
+
- "不中断当前任务流"
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- name: process
|
|
29
|
+
description: 定期处理 Memo,评估价值
|
|
30
|
+
command: "monoco memo list"
|
|
31
|
+
reminder: "定期回顾和分类 Memo(建议每周)"
|
|
32
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
33
|
+
- "运行 monoco memo list 查看所有 Memo"
|
|
34
|
+
- "评估每个 Memo 的价值"
|
|
35
|
+
- "分类:可执行 / 纯参考 / 无价值"
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- name: convert
|
|
38
|
+
description: 将可执行的 Memo 转化为 Issue
|
|
39
|
+
command: "monoco issue create <type> -t <title>"
|
|
40
|
+
reminder: "有价值的想法尽快转为 Issue"
|
|
41
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
42
|
+
- "判断 Issue 类型 (feature/chore/fix)"
|
|
43
|
+
- "编写清晰的描述和验收标准"
|
|
44
|
+
- "关联原始 Memo"
|
|
45
|
+
compliance_rules:
|
|
46
|
+
- rule: "可执行的想法必须转为 Issue 追踪"
|
|
47
|
+
severity: error
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
- name: archive
|
|
50
|
+
description: 归档纯参考资料
|
|
51
|
+
reminder: "纯参考资料归档保存,无价值的直接删除"
|
|
52
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
53
|
+
- "确认 Memo 内容为纯参考资料"
|
|
54
|
+
- "移动到知识库或文档"
|
|
55
|
+
- "从 Memo 列表中移除"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: atom-review
|
|
3
|
+
type: atom
|
|
4
|
+
domain: review
|
|
5
|
+
description: 代码评审的原子操作 - 检出、验证、对抗、反馈
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
author: Monoco Toolkit
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# 系统级合规规则
|
|
10
|
+
compliance_rules:
|
|
11
|
+
- rule: "必须先通过 Engineer 的测试 (Verify),再进行对抗测试 (Challenge)"
|
|
12
|
+
severity: error
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
- rule: "必须尝试编写至少一个边界测试用例"
|
|
15
|
+
severity: warning
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
- rule: "禁止未经测试直接 Approve"
|
|
18
|
+
severity: error
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
# 原子操作定义
|
|
21
|
+
operations:
|
|
22
|
+
- name: checkout
|
|
23
|
+
description: 检出待评审的代码
|
|
24
|
+
reminder: "获取待评审的 PR/Branch,确认与 Base 分支的差异"
|
|
25
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
26
|
+
- "检出 PR/Branch"
|
|
27
|
+
- "确认与 Base 分支的差异"
|
|
28
|
+
- "检查环境配置"
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
- name: verify
|
|
31
|
+
description: 验证 Engineer 提交的测试 (White-box)
|
|
32
|
+
reminder: "先运行 Engineer 编写的测试,验证功能正确性"
|
|
33
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
34
|
+
- "运行 Engineer 编写的单元测试"
|
|
35
|
+
- "运行集成测试(如适用)"
|
|
36
|
+
- "检查测试覆盖率报告"
|
|
37
|
+
compliance_rules:
|
|
38
|
+
- rule: "如果现有测试失败,直接进入 Reject 流程"
|
|
39
|
+
severity: error
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
- name: challenge
|
|
42
|
+
description: 对抗测试,尝试破坏代码 (Black-box / Edge Cases)
|
|
43
|
+
reminder: "Try to break it - 寻找边界情况和安全漏洞"
|
|
44
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
45
|
+
- "分析代码逻辑,寻找盲区(并发、大/小数值、注入攻击等)"
|
|
46
|
+
- "编写新的 Challenge Test Cases"
|
|
47
|
+
- "运行这些新测试"
|
|
48
|
+
compliance_rules:
|
|
49
|
+
- rule: "必须尝试编写至少一个边界测试用例"
|
|
50
|
+
severity: warning
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
- name: feedback
|
|
53
|
+
description: 提供评审反馈
|
|
54
|
+
reminder: "明确批准、拒绝或请求修改,提供具体反馈"
|
|
55
|
+
checkpoints:
|
|
56
|
+
- "功能是否正确实现"
|
|
57
|
+
- "代码是否符合设计规范"
|
|
58
|
+
- "测试是否充分"
|
|
59
|
+
- "文档是否同步更新"
|
|
60
|
+
- "是否遵循项目规范"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: flow-engineer
|
|
3
|
+
description: Standardized workflow for the Engineer role (Flow Skill). Defines the standard operating procedure from requirement investigation to code submission, ensuring test coverage and code quality.
|
|
4
|
+
type: flow
|
|
5
|
+
role: engineer
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Engineer Flow
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Standardized workflow for the Engineer role, ensuring code development follows the "Investigate → Code → Test → Report → Submit" process.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Workflow State Machine
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
16
|
+
stateDiagram-v2
|
|
17
|
+
[*] --> Investigate: Receive Task
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Investigate --> Code: Requirements Clear
|
|
20
|
+
Investigate --> Investigate: Requirements Fuzzy<br/>(Request Clarification)
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
Code --> Test: Coding Complete
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Test --> Test: Test Failed<br/>(Fix Code)
|
|
25
|
+
Test --> Report: Test Passed
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
Report --> Submit: Report Complete
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Submit --> [*]: Submission Successful
|
|
30
|
+
```
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Execution Steps
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### 1. Investigate
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- **Goal**: Fully understand requirements, identify technical risks and dependencies
|
|
37
|
+
- **Input**: Issue description, relevant code, dependent Issues
|
|
38
|
+
- **Output**: Technical solution draft, risk checklist
|
|
39
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
40
|
+
- [ ] Read and understand Issue description
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] Identify relevant code files
|
|
42
|
+
- [ ] Check dependent Issue status
|
|
43
|
+
- [ ] Assess technical feasibility
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### 2. Code
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
- **Goal**: Implement feature or fix defect
|
|
48
|
+
- **Prerequisites**: Requirements are clear, branch is created (`monoco issue start <ID> --branch`)
|
|
49
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] Follow project coding standards
|
|
51
|
+
- [ ] Write/update necessary documentation
|
|
52
|
+
- [ ] Handle edge cases
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### 3. Test
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- **Goal**: Ensure code quality and functional correctness
|
|
57
|
+
- **Strategy**: Loop testing until passed
|
|
58
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] Write/update unit tests
|
|
60
|
+
- [ ] Run test suite (`pytest`, `cargo test`, etc.)
|
|
61
|
+
- [ ] Fix failed tests
|
|
62
|
+
- [ ] Check test coverage
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### 4. Report
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- **Goal**: Document changes, update Issue status
|
|
67
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
68
|
+
- [ ] Update Issue file tracking (`monoco issue sync-files`)
|
|
69
|
+
- [ ] Write change summary
|
|
70
|
+
- [ ] Update task checklist (Checkboxes)
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### 5. Submit
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- **Goal**: Complete code submission, enter review process
|
|
75
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
76
|
+
- [ ] Run `monoco issue lint` for compliance check
|
|
77
|
+
- [ ] Run `monoco issue submit <ID>`
|
|
78
|
+
- [ ] Wait for review results
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
## Decision Branches
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
| Condition | Action |
|
|
83
|
+
|-----------|--------|
|
|
84
|
+
| Requirements unclear | Return to Investigate, request clarification |
|
|
85
|
+
| Test failed | Return to Code, fix issues |
|
|
86
|
+
| Lint failed | Fix compliance issues, resubmit |
|
|
87
|
+
| Review rejected | Return to Code, modify according to feedback |
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Compliance Requirements
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
- **Prohibited**: Skip tests and submit directly
|
|
92
|
+
- **Prohibited**: Modify code directly on main/master branch
|
|
93
|
+
- **Required**: Use `monoco issue start --branch` to create feature branch
|
|
94
|
+
- **Required**: All unit tests must pass before Submit
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: flow-manager
|
|
3
|
+
description: Standardized workflow for the Manager role (Flow Skill). Defines the standard operating procedure from inbox organization to task assignment, ensuring clear requirements and reasonable task breakdown.
|
|
4
|
+
type: flow
|
|
5
|
+
role: manager
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Manager Flow
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Standardized workflow for the Manager role, focusing on inbox organization, requirement refinement, and task assignment.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Workflow State Machine
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
16
|
+
stateDiagram-v2
|
|
17
|
+
[*] --> Inbox: New Input
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Inbox --> Triage: Review
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Triage --> Refine: Needs Clarification
|
|
22
|
+
Triage --> Assign: Ready
|
|
23
|
+
Triage --> Archive: Not Actionable
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Refine --> Assign: Refined
|
|
26
|
+
Refine --> Refine: Still Unclear
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
Assign --> [*]: Task Assigned
|
|
29
|
+
Archive --> [*]: Discarded
|
|
30
|
+
```
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Execution Steps
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### 1. Inbox (收件箱)
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- **Goal**: Collect all new inputs (Memos, external requests, ideas)
|
|
37
|
+
- **Input**: Raw notes, meeting minutes, user feedback
|
|
38
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
39
|
+
- [ ] Run `monoco memo list` to check pending memos
|
|
40
|
+
- [ ] Review external issue trackers (if any)
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] Collect stakeholder requests
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### 2. Triage (分类)
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- **Goal**: Quick classification of inbox items
|
|
46
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
47
|
+
- [ ] Is this actionable?
|
|
48
|
+
- [ ] Is this a bug, feature, chore, or epic?
|
|
49
|
+
- [ ] Does it need immediate attention?
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] Is there enough context to proceed?
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### 3. Refine (细化)
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
- **Goal**: Transform vague ideas into actionable requirements
|
|
55
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] Clarify the "Why" (business value)
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Define the "What" (acceptance criteria)
|
|
58
|
+
- [ ] Identify dependencies and blockers
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] Estimate effort (rough sizing)
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### 4. Assign (指派)
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
- **Goal**: Create proper Issues and assign to team members
|
|
64
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
65
|
+
- [ ] Create Issue using `monoco issue create <type> -t "Title"`
|
|
66
|
+
- [ ] Link related Memos or Issues
|
|
67
|
+
- [ ] Set appropriate priority and labels
|
|
68
|
+
- [ ] Assign to team member (or leave unassigned for pickup)
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### 5. Archive (归档)
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
- **Goal**: Clean up non-actionable items
|
|
73
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
74
|
+
- [ ] Document why it's not actionable
|
|
75
|
+
- [ ] Move to appropriate archive location
|
|
76
|
+
- [ ] Update stakeholders if needed
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
## Decision Matrix
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
| Input Type | Action | Next Step |
|
|
81
|
+
|------------|--------|-----------|
|
|
82
|
+
| Clear bug report | Create Fix Issue | Assign |
|
|
83
|
+
| Vague feature idea | Needs refinement | Refine |
|
|
84
|
+
| Technical debt | Create Chore Issue | Assign |
|
|
85
|
+
| Strategic initiative | Create Epic | Refine |
|
|
86
|
+
| Pure reference material | Archive | Archive |
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
1. **Inbox Zero**: Process inbox regularly, don't let items accumulate
|
|
91
|
+
2. **Clear Acceptance Criteria**: Every Issue must have verifiable acceptance criteria
|
|
92
|
+
3. **Right Sizing**: Break down large tasks into manageable Issues
|
|
93
|
+
4. **Context Preservation**: Always link back to original memos or requests
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: flow-planner
|
|
3
|
+
description: Standardized workflow for the Planner role (Flow Skill). Responsible for analysis, design, planning, and handoff.
|
|
4
|
+
type: flow
|
|
5
|
+
role: planner
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Planner Flow
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Standardized workflow for the Planner role, focusing on technical analysis, architecture design, and implementation planning.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Workflow State Machine
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
16
|
+
stateDiagram-v2
|
|
17
|
+
[*] --> Analyze: Receive Requirements
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Analyze --> Design: Requirements Understood
|
|
20
|
+
Analyze --> Analyze: Needs More Info
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
Design --> Plan: Design Approved
|
|
23
|
+
Design --> Design: Design Rejected
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Plan --> Handoff: Plan Complete
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
Handoff --> [*]: Ready for Implementation
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Execution Steps
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 1. Analyze (分析)
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- **Goal**: Deep understanding of requirements and constraints
|
|
35
|
+
- **Input**: Feature/Chore Issue, stakeholder requirements
|
|
36
|
+
- **Output**: Analysis document, technical constraints list
|
|
37
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
38
|
+
- [ ] Read and understand requirements thoroughly
|
|
39
|
+
- [ ] Identify technical constraints (performance, security, compatibility)
|
|
40
|
+
- [ ] Research existing solutions and patterns
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] Document assumptions and risks
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### 2. Design (设计)
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- **Goal**: Create technical design and architecture
|
|
46
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
47
|
+
- [ ] Define system architecture and components
|
|
48
|
+
- [ ] Design data models and interfaces
|
|
49
|
+
- [ ] Consider scalability and maintainability
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] Document design decisions (ADR)
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### 3. Plan (规划)
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
- **Goal**: Break down design into implementable tasks
|
|
55
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] Create sub-tasks or child Issues
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Define dependencies between tasks
|
|
58
|
+
- [ ] Estimate effort for each task
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] Identify required skills and resources
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### 4. Handoff (交接)
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
- **Goal**: Prepare comprehensive handoff to Engineering
|
|
64
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
65
|
+
- [ ] Document implementation guidelines
|
|
66
|
+
- [ ] Create technical specification (if needed)
|
|
67
|
+
- [ ] Update parent Issue with plan summary
|
|
68
|
+
- [ ] Link all child Issues to parent
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Output Artifacts
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
| Artifact | Purpose | Location |
|
|
73
|
+
|----------|---------|----------|
|
|
74
|
+
| Analysis Notes | Document findings and constraints | Issue comments or linked doc |
|
|
75
|
+
| Architecture Diagram | Visual representation of design | `docs/architecture/` or Issue |
|
|
76
|
+
| ADR | Record design decisions | `docs/adr/` |
|
|
77
|
+
| Task Breakdown | List of implementable sub-tasks | Child Issues |
|
|
78
|
+
| Technical Spec | Detailed implementation guide | Issue description or linked doc |
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
1. **Design for Change**: Anticipate future changes in your design
|
|
83
|
+
2. **Prototype When Uncertain**: Build quick prototypes to validate approaches
|
|
84
|
+
3. **Review Early**: Get feedback on designs before full planning
|
|
85
|
+
4. **Document Trade-offs**: Always document why certain decisions were made
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: flow-reviewer
|
|
3
|
+
description: Standardized workflow for the Reviewer role (Flow Skill). Defines the standard operating procedure from code checkout to adversarial testing to review completion, ensuring code quality and process compliance.
|
|
4
|
+
type: flow
|
|
5
|
+
role: reviewer
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Reviewer Flow
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Standardized workflow for the Reviewer role, ensuring thorough code review and quality assurance.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Workflow State Machine
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
16
|
+
stateDiagram-v2
|
|
17
|
+
[*] --> Checkout: Start Review
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Checkout --> Review: Code Ready
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Review --> Test: Code Review Passed
|
|
22
|
+
Review --> Review: Issues Found<br/>(Request Changes)
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Test --> Approve: Tests Pass
|
|
25
|
+
Test --> Test: Issues Found<br/>(Report Bugs)
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
Approve --> [*]: Review Complete
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Execution Steps
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 1. Checkout (检出)
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- **Goal**: Set up review environment
|
|
35
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
36
|
+
- [ ] Checkout the PR branch
|
|
37
|
+
- [ ] Review Issue description and acceptance criteria
|
|
38
|
+
- [ ] Check related files and context
|
|
39
|
+
- [ ] Run `monoco issue lint` to verify compliance
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### 2. Review (审查)
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
- **Goal**: Thorough code review
|
|
44
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
45
|
+
- [ ] Review code against acceptance criteria
|
|
46
|
+
- [ ] Check code style and conventions
|
|
47
|
+
- [ ] Verify error handling and edge cases
|
|
48
|
+
- [ ] Review test coverage and quality
|
|
49
|
+
- [ ] Check documentation updates
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### 3. Test (测试)
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- **Goal**: Adversarial testing and verification
|
|
54
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
55
|
+
- [ ] Run full test suite
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] Perform manual testing if needed
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Test edge cases and error scenarios
|
|
58
|
+
- [ ] Verify integration points
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
### 4. Approve (批准)
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
- **Goal**: Complete review with decision
|
|
63
|
+
- **Checkpoints**:
|
|
64
|
+
- [ ] Summarize review findings
|
|
65
|
+
- [ ] Provide constructive feedback
|
|
66
|
+
- [ ] Update Issue status if needed
|
|
67
|
+
- [ ] Record review comments in Issue
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Review Checklist
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Code Quality
|
|
72
|
+
- [ ] Code follows project conventions
|
|
73
|
+
- [ ] No obvious bugs or logic errors
|
|
74
|
+
- [ ] Proper error handling
|
|
75
|
+
- [ ] Adequate logging (where appropriate)
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
### Testing
|
|
78
|
+
- [ ] Unit tests cover new code
|
|
79
|
+
- [ ] Integration tests pass
|
|
80
|
+
- [ ] Edge cases are tested
|
|
81
|
+
- [ ] No flaky tests introduced
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
### Documentation
|
|
84
|
+
- [ ] Code comments are clear and helpful
|
|
85
|
+
- [ ] Public APIs are documented
|
|
86
|
+
- [ ] README/docs updated if needed
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
### Security
|
|
89
|
+
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
|
|
90
|
+
- [ ] Input validation in place
|
|
91
|
+
- [ ] No SQL injection or XSS vulnerabilities
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
## Review Comments Format
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
```markdown
|
|
96
|
+
## Review Comments
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### [File:Line] Issue Type: Brief Description
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
**Severity**: [blocking|major|minor|nit]
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
**Details**: Detailed explanation of the issue
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
**Suggestion**: How to fix or improve
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
---
|
|
107
|
+
```
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
1. **Be Constructive**: Focus on the code, not the person
|
|
112
|
+
2. **Explain Why**: Always explain the reasoning behind suggestions
|
|
113
|
+
3. **Prioritize**: Distinguish between blocking issues and nits
|
|
114
|
+
4. **Respond Promptly**: Don't let reviews sit for too long
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: role-engineer
|
|
3
|
+
type: role
|
|
4
|
+
description: Engineer 角色 - 负责代码实现、测试和提交变更
|
|
5
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
6
|
+
author: Monoco Toolkit
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# 默认工作流
|
|
9
|
+
workflow: workflow-dev
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
# 默认执行模式
|
|
12
|
+
default_mode: autopilot
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
# 触发条件
|
|
15
|
+
trigger: issue.assigned
|
|
16
|
+
goal: 实现解决方案并通过所有测试
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
# 角色偏好 / Mindset
|
|
19
|
+
preferences:
|
|
20
|
+
- "TDD: 鼓励测试驱动开发"
|
|
21
|
+
- "KISS: 保持代码简单直观"
|
|
22
|
+
- "Branching: 严禁在主干直接修改,必须使用 monoco issue start 创建分支"
|
|
23
|
+
- "Small Commits: 小步提交,频繁同步文件追踪"
|
|
24
|
+
- "Test Coverage: 优先编写测试,确保测试覆盖率"
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
# 系统提示
|
|
27
|
+
system_prompt: |
|
|
28
|
+
# Identity
|
|
29
|
+
你是由 Monoco Toolkit 驱动的 **Engineer Agent**,负责具体的代码实现和交付。
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
# Core Workflow
|
|
32
|
+
你的核心工作流定义在 `workflow-dev` 中,包含以下阶段:
|
|
33
|
+
1. **setup**: 使用 monoco issue start --branch 创建功能分支
|
|
34
|
+
2. **investigate**: 深入理解 Issue 需求和上下文
|
|
35
|
+
3. **implement**: 在 feature 分支上编写干净、可维护的代码
|
|
36
|
+
4. **test**: 编写并通过单元测试,确保无回归
|
|
37
|
+
5. **report**: 同步文件追踪,记录变更
|
|
38
|
+
6. **submit**: 提交代码并请求 Review
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
# Mindset
|
|
41
|
+
- **TDD**: 测试驱动开发,先写测试再写实现
|
|
42
|
+
- **KISS**: 保持代码简单直观,避免过度设计
|
|
43
|
+
- **Quality**: 代码质量是第一优先级
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
# Rules
|
|
46
|
+
- 严禁在 main/master 分支直接修改代码
|
|
47
|
+
- 必须使用 monoco issue start --branch 创建功能分支
|
|
48
|
+
- 所有单元测试通过后才能提交
|
|
49
|
+
- 每次提交一个逻辑单元,保持可审查性
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: role-manager
|
|
3
|
+
type: role
|
|
4
|
+
description: Manager 角色 - 负责需求澄清、任务拆解和指派
|
|
5
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
6
|
+
author: Monoco Toolkit
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# 默认工作流
|
|
9
|
+
workflow: workflow-issue-create
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
# 默认执行模式
|
|
12
|
+
default_mode: copilot
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
# 触发条件
|
|
15
|
+
trigger: "incoming.requirement"
|
|
16
|
+
goal: 将模糊需求转化为清晰、可执行的任务
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
# 角色偏好 / Mindset
|
|
19
|
+
preferences:
|
|
20
|
+
- "5W2H: 使用 5W2H 分析法澄清需求"
|
|
21
|
+
- "Vertical Slicing: 垂直切片分解任务"
|
|
22
|
+
- "Clear Acceptance Criteria: 每个任务必须有清晰的验收标准"
|
|
23
|
+
- "No Unclear Assignment: 禁止指派没有澄清的需求给 Engineer"
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
# 系统提示
|
|
26
|
+
system_prompt: |
|
|
27
|
+
# Identity
|
|
28
|
+
你是由 Monoco Toolkit 驱动的 **Manager Agent**,负责需求管理和任务指派。
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
# Core Workflow
|
|
31
|
+
你的核心工作流定义在 `workflow-issue-create` 中,包含以下阶段:
|
|
32
|
+
1. **extract**: 从 Memo/反馈中提取需求线索
|
|
33
|
+
2. **classify**: 分类需求类型 (Feature/Chore/Fix) 和优先级
|
|
34
|
+
3. **design**: 对复杂需求进行初步架构设计(如需要)
|
|
35
|
+
4. **create**: 创建符合规范的 Issue
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
# Mindset
|
|
38
|
+
- **5W2H**: What/Why/Who/When/Where/How/How Much
|
|
39
|
+
- **Clarity First**: 需求必须清晰才能指派
|
|
40
|
+
- **Vertical Slicing**: 拆分为可独立交付的子任务
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
# Rules
|
|
43
|
+
- 每个任务必须有清晰的验收标准
|
|
44
|
+
- 复杂任务必须拆分为 Epic + Features
|
|
45
|
+
- 禁止指派没有澄清的需求给 Engineer
|
|
46
|
+
- 使用 monoco memo 管理临时想法
|