moai-adk 0.15.1__py3-none-any.whl → 0.32.8__py3-none-any.whl

moai_adk/core/spec/confidence_scoring.py

@@ -0,0 +1,680 @@
+"""Confidence Scoring System for Auto-SPEC Generation."""
+
+import ast
+import logging
+import re
+import time
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Tuple
+
+# Configure logging
+logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+# SpecGenerator: Placeholder for spec generation functionality
+class SpecGenerator:
+    """Placeholder SpecGenerator class for confidence scoring."""
+
+    def __init__(self):
+        self.name = "SpecGenerator"
+
+    def generate_spec(self, file_path: str, content: str) -> str:
+        """Generate a basic SPEC document."""
+        return f"SPEC document for {file_path}\n\nConfidence analysis: {content[:100]}..."
+
+
+class ConfidenceScoringSystem:
+    """
+    Advanced confidence scoring system for auto-generated SPECs.
+
+    This system analyzes code structure, domain relevance, and documentation
+    quality to provide confidence scores for SPEC auto-generation.
+    """
+
+    def __init__(self):
+        self.spec_generator = SpecGenerator()
+        self.word_patterns = {
+            "security": [
+                "auth",
+                "login",
+                "password",
+                "encrypt",
+                "security",
+                "bcrypt",
+                "hash",
+                "token",
+            ],
+            "data": [
+                "model",
+                "entity",
+                "schema",
+                "database",
+                "persistence",
+                "storage",
+                "cache",
+            ],
+            "api": [
+                "api",
+                "endpoint",
+                "route",
+                "controller",
+                "service",
+                "handler",
+                "middleware",
+            ],
+            "ui": [
+                "ui",
+                "interface",
+                "component",
+                "widget",
+                "layout",
+                "theme",
+                "display",
+            ],
+            "business": ["business", "logic", "process", "workflow", "rule", "policy"],
+            "testing": [
+                "test",
+                "mock",
+                "fixture",
+                "assertion",
+                "verification",
+                "validation",
+            ],
+        }
+
+    def analyze_code_structure(self, file_path: str) -> Dict[str, float]:
+        """
+        Analyze code structure quality.
+
+        Args:
+            file_path: Path to the Python code file
+
+        Returns:
+            Dictionary with structure scores
+        """
+        try:
+            with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+                code_content = f.read()
+
+            # Parse AST
+            tree = ast.parse(code_content)
+
+            structure_scores = {
+                "class_count": 0,
+                "function_count": 0,
+                "method_count": 0,
+                "import_count": 0,
+                "complexity_score": 0.0,
+                "nesting_depth": 0,
+                "docstring_coverage": 0.0,
+                "naming_consistency": 0.0,
+            }
+
+            # Analyze AST nodes
+            for node in ast.walk(tree):
+                if isinstance(node, ast.ClassDef):
+                    structure_scores["class_count"] += 1
+                    # Check if class has docstring
+                    if ast.get_docstring(node):
+                        structure_scores["docstring_coverage"] += 0.1
+                    # Count methods
+                    for child in ast.walk(node):
+                        if isinstance(child, ast.FunctionDef):
+                            structure_scores["method_count"] += 1
+
+                elif isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
+                    # Check if function is not a method (not inside a class)
+                    is_method = False
+                    for parent in ast.walk(tree):
+                        if isinstance(parent, ast.ClassDef):
+                            for child in parent.body:
+                                if child == node:
+                                    is_method = True
+                                    break
+
+                    if not is_method:
+                        structure_scores["function_count"] += 1
+
+                    # Check if function has docstring
+                    if ast.get_docstring(node):
+                        structure_scores["docstring_coverage"] += 0.1
+
+                elif isinstance(node, ast.Import) or isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom):
+                    structure_scores["import_count"] += 1
+
+            # Calculate complexity score (cyclomatic complexity approximation)
+            structure_scores["complexity_score"] = self._calculate_complexity(tree)
+
+            # Calculate nesting depth
+            structure_scores["nesting_depth"] = self._calculate_nesting_depth(tree)
+
+            # Calculate naming consistency
+            structure_scores["naming_consistency"] = self._calculate_naming_consistency(tree)
+
+            # Normalize scores (0-1 range)
+            max_classes = 5  # Reasonable upper bound
+            max_functions = 20
+            max_methods = 50
+            max_imports = 15
+            max_complexity = 10
+            max_nesting = 5
+            max_docstring = 1.0
+
+            normalized_scores = {
+                "class_ratio": min(structure_scores["class_count"] / max_classes, 1.0),
+                "function_ratio": min(structure_scores["function_count"] / max_functions, 1.0),
+                "method_ratio": min(structure_scores["method_count"] / max_methods, 1.0),
+                "import_ratio": min(structure_scores["import_count"] / max_imports, 1.0),
+                "complexity_ratio": max(0, 1.0 - structure_scores["complexity_score"] / max_complexity),
+                "nesting_ratio": max(0, 1.0 - structure_scores["nesting_depth"] / max_nesting),
+                "docstring_score": min(structure_scores["docstring_coverage"] / max_docstring, 1.0),
+                "naming_score": structure_scores["naming_consistency"],
+            }
+
+            return normalized_scores
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            logger.error(f"Error analyzing code structure: {e}")
+            return self._get_default_structure_scores()
+
+    def _calculate_complexity(self, tree: ast.AST) -> float:
+        """Calculate approximate cyclomatic complexity."""
+        complexity = 1  # Base complexity
+
+        for node in ast.walk(tree):
+            if isinstance(node, (ast.If, ast.For, ast.While, ast.Try, ast.With)):
+                complexity += 1
+            elif isinstance(node, ast.BoolOp):
+                complexity += len(node.values) - 1
+
+        return complexity
+
+    def _calculate_nesting_depth(self, tree: ast.AST) -> int:
+        """Calculate maximum nesting depth."""
+        max_depth = 0
+
+        def _visit(node, depth):
+            nonlocal max_depth
+            max_depth = max(max_depth, depth)
+
+            for child in ast.iter_child_nodes(node):
+                if isinstance(child, (ast.If, ast.For, ast.While, ast.Try, ast.With)):
+                    _visit(child, depth + 1)
+                else:
+                    _visit(child, depth)
+
+        _visit(tree, 0)
+        return max_depth
+
+    def _calculate_naming_consistency(self, tree: ast.AST) -> float:
+        """Calculate naming consistency score."""
+        names = []
+
+        for node in ast.walk(tree):
+            if isinstance(node, ast.Name):
+                names.append(node.id)
+            elif isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
+                names.append(node.name)
+            elif isinstance(node, ast.ClassDef):
+                names.append(node.name)
+
+        if not names:
+            return 1.0
+
+        # Check naming patterns
+        snake_case_count = 0
+        camel_case_count = 0
+
+        for name in names:
+            if re.match(r"^[a-z]+(?:_[a-z]+)*$", name):
+                snake_case_count += 1
+            elif re.match(r"^[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$", name):
+                camel_case_count += 1
+
+        # Calculate consistency
+        total_names = len(names)
+        if total_names == 0:
+            return 1.0
+
+        snake_case_ratio = snake_case_count / total_names
+        camel_case_ratio = camel_case_count / total_names
+
+        # Favor consistency over specific style
+        if snake_case_ratio > 0.7 or camel_case_ratio > 0.7:
+            return 0.9
+        elif snake_case_ratio > 0.5 or camel_case_ratio > 0.5:
+            return 0.7
+        else:
+            return 0.5
+
+    def _get_default_structure_scores(self) -> Dict[str, float]:
+        """Get default structure scores for error cases."""
+        return {
+            "class_ratio": 0.5,
+            "function_ratio": 0.5,
+            "method_ratio": 0.5,
+            "import_ratio": 0.5,
+            "complexity_ratio": 0.7,
+            "nesting_ratio": 0.7,
+            "docstring_score": 0.3,
+            "naming_score": 0.5,
+        }
+
+    def analyze_domain_relevance(self, file_path: str) -> Dict[str, float]:
+        """
+        Analyze domain relevance and keyword patterns.
+
+        Args:
+            file_path: Path to the code file
+
+        Returns:
+            Dictionary with domain relevance scores
+        """
+        try:
+            with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+                content = f.read()
+
+            # Normalize content
+            content = content.lower()
+
+            # Check for domain-specific patterns
+            domain_scores = {}
+
+            for domain, patterns in self.word_patterns.items():
+                matches = 0
+                for pattern in patterns:
+                    if pattern in content:
+                        matches += 1
+                # Normalize by number of patterns
+                domain_scores[f"{domain}_coverage"] = matches / len(patterns)
+
+            # Calculate overall domain relevance
+            total_relevance = sum(domain_scores.values())
+            domain_scores["overall_relevance"] = min(total_relevance / len(self.word_patterns), 1.0)
+
+            # Calculate domain specificity (how focused the code is)
+            max_domain = max(domain_scores.values()) if domain_scores.values() else 0
+            domain_scores["specificity"] = max_domain
+
+            # Calculate technical vocabulary density
+            technical_words = len(
+                re.findall(
+                    r"\b(?:api|endpoint|service|controller|model|entity|schema|database|cache|auth|login|password|token|session|user|admin|customer|product|order|payment|billing|subscription|plan|feature|function|method|class|interface|abstract|extends|implements|override|virtual|static|dynamic|async|await|promise|callback|event|handler|middleware|filter|validator|transformer|processor|worker|thread|queue|job|task|cron|scheduler|config|setting|env|variable|constant|property|attribute|field|column|table|index|constraint|foreign|primary|unique|notnull|default|check|trigger|procedure|function|stored|view|materialized|temp|temporary|permanent|persistent|volatile|in-memory|file-based|disk-based|cloud|distributed|clustered|load-balanced|scalable|high-availability|fault-tolerant|redundant|backup|restore|migration|version|branch|merge|conflict|resolve|commit|push|pull|fork|clone|repository|github|gitlab|bitbucket|ci|cd|pipeline|workflow|deployment|staging|production|development|testing|unit|integration|e2e|performance|load|stress|security|vulnerability|attack|breach|authentication|authorization|encryption|decryption|hash|salt|pepper|session|cookie|jwt|oauth|ldap|saml|rbac|abac|detection|prevention|monitoring|logging|tracing|metrics|analytics|dashboard|report|chart|graph|visualization|ui|ux|frontend|backend|fullstack|mobile|web|desktop|cross-platform|native|hybrid|responsive|adaptive|progressive|spa|pwa|ssr|csr|mvc|mvvm|riot|angular|react|vue|ember|backbone|knockout|jquery|vanilla|plain|pure|framework|library|package|module|bundle|dependency|require|import|export|include|extend|inherit|compose|aggregate|delegate|proxy|facade|adapter|bridge|decorator|singleton|factory|builder|prototype|command|observer|strategy|state|chain|iterator|visitor|mediator|composite|flyweight|proxy|interpreter|template|method|abstract|factory|builder|prototype|singleton|adapter|bridge|composite|decorator|facade|flyweight|proxy|chain|command|iterator|mediator|memento|observer|state|strategy|template|visitor)\b",
+                    content,
+                )
+            )
+            total_words = len(content.split())
+
+            if total_words > 0:
+                domain_scores["technical_density"] = min(technical_words / total_words, 1.0)
+            else:
+                domain_scores["technical_density"] = 0.0
+
+            return domain_scores
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            logger.error(f"Error analyzing domain relevance: {e}")
+            return {
+                "security_coverage": 0.0,
+                "data_coverage": 0.0,
+                "api_coverage": 0.0,
+                "ui_coverage": 0.0,
+                "business_coverage": 0.0,
+                "testing_coverage": 0.0,
+                "overall_relevance": 0.5,
+                "specificity": 0.5,
+                "technical_density": 0.3,
+            }
+
+    def analyze_documentation_quality(self, file_path: str) -> Dict[str, float]:
+        """
+        Analyze documentation quality.
+
+        Args:
+            file_path: Path to the code file
+
+        Returns:
+            Dictionary with documentation scores
+        """
+        try:
+            with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
+                content = f.read()
+
+            doc_scores = {
+                "docstring_coverage": 0.0,
+                "comment_density": 0.0,
+                "explanation_quality": 0.0,
+                "examples_present": 0.0,
+                "parameter_documentation": 0.0,
+                "return_documentation": 0.0,
+                "exception_documentation": 0.0,
+            }
+
+            # Parse AST for docstring analysis
+            tree = ast.parse(content)
+
+            total_functions = 0
+            documented_functions = 0
+            documented_classes = 0
+            total_classes = 0
+
+            for node in ast.walk(tree):
+                if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
+                    total_functions += 1
+                    if ast.get_docstring(node):
+                        documented_functions += 1
+                        # Check for parameter documentation
+                        if ":" in ast.get_docstring(node) or "param" in ast.get_docstring(node):
+                            doc_scores["parameter_documentation"] = 0.8
+                        if "return" in ast.get_docstring(node) or "->" in ast.get_docstring(node):
+                            doc_scores["return_documentation"] = 0.8
+                        if "raise" in ast.get_docstring(node) or "exception" in ast.get_docstring(node):
+                            doc_scores["exception_documentation"] = 0.8
+
+                elif isinstance(node, ast.ClassDef):
+                    total_classes += 1
+                    if ast.get_docstring(node):
+                        documented_classes += 1
+
+            # Calculate docstring coverage
+            if total_functions > 0:
+                doc_scores["docstring_coverage"] = documented_functions / total_functions
+            if total_classes > 0:
+                class_coverage = documented_classes / total_classes
+                doc_scores["docstring_coverage"] = max(doc_scores["docstring_coverage"], class_coverage)
+
+            # Calculate comment density
+            lines = content.split("\n")
+            comment_lines = 0
+            code_lines = 0
+
+            for line in lines:
+                stripped = line.strip()
+                if stripped.startswith("#"):
+                    comment_lines += 1
+                elif stripped and not stripped.startswith('"""') and not stripped.startswith("'''"):
+                    code_lines += 1
+
+            if code_lines > 0:
+                doc_scores["comment_density"] = min(comment_lines / code_lines, 1.0)
+
+            # Check for examples in docstrings
+            total_docstring_length = len(ast.get_docstring(tree) or "")
+            if total_docstring_length > 0:
+                example_count = len(re.findall(r">>>|Example:|example:|\b\d+\.\s", content))
+                doc_scores["examples_present"] = min(example_count / 3, 1.0)
+
+            # Calculate explanation quality based on docstring content
+            docstring_content = ast.get_docstring(tree) or ""
+            if docstring_content:
+                # Check for good explanation indicators
+                explanation_indicators = [
+                    "provides",
+                    "allows",
+                    "enables",
+                    "implements",
+                    "handles",
+                    "processes",
+                    "manages",
+                ]
+                explanation_count = sum(1 for indicator in explanation_indicators if indicator in docstring_content)
+                doc_scores["explanation_quality"] = min(explanation_count / len(explanation_indicators), 1.0)
+
+            return doc_scores
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            logger.error(f"Error analyzing documentation quality: {e}")
+            return {
+                "docstring_coverage": 0.3,
+                "comment_density": 0.2,
+                "explanation_quality": 0.3,
+                "examples_present": 0.0,
+                "parameter_documentation": 0.2,
+                "return_documentation": 0.2,
+                "exception_documentation": 0.1,
+            }
+
+    def calculate_confidence_score(
+        self,
+        file_path: str,
+        structure_weights: Dict[str, float] = None,
+        domain_weights: Dict[str, float] = None,
+        doc_weights: Dict[str, float] = None,
+    ) -> Tuple[float, Dict[str, Any]]:
+        """
+        Calculate overall confidence score for auto-SPEC generation.
+
+        Args:
+            file_path: Path to the code file
+            structure_weights: Weights for structure analysis
+            domain_weights: Weights for domain analysis
+            doc_weights: Weights for documentation analysis
+
+        Returns:
+            Tuple of (confidence_score, detailed_analysis)
+        """
+        start_time = time.time()
+
+        # Default weights
+        default_structure_weights = {
+            "class_ratio": 0.1,
+            "function_ratio": 0.1,
+            "method_ratio": 0.1,
+            "import_ratio": 0.1,
+            "complexity_ratio": 0.15,
+            "nesting_ratio": 0.15,
+            "docstring_score": 0.15,
+            "naming_score": 0.15,
+        }
+
+        default_domain_weights = {
+            "overall_relevance": 0.3,
+            "specificity": 0.2,
+            "technical_density": 0.3,
+            "security_coverage": 0.1,
+            "data_coverage": 0.1,
+        }
+
+        default_doc_weights = {
+            "docstring_coverage": 0.3,
+            "comment_density": 0.2,
+            "explanation_quality": 0.2,
+            "examples_present": 0.1,
+            "parameter_documentation": 0.1,
+            "return_documentation": 0.1,
+        }
+
+        # Use provided weights or defaults
+        structure_weights = structure_weights or default_structure_weights
+        domain_weights = domain_weights or default_domain_weights
+        doc_weights = doc_weights or default_doc_weights
+
+        # Analyze code
+        structure_analysis = self.analyze_code_structure(file_path)
+        domain_analysis = self.analyze_domain_relevance(file_path)
+        doc_analysis = self.analyze_documentation_quality(file_path)
+
+        # Calculate weighted scores
+        structure_score = sum(structure_analysis[key] * structure_weights.get(key, 0) for key in structure_analysis)
+
+        domain_score = sum(domain_analysis[key] * domain_weights.get(key, 0) for key in domain_analysis)
+
+        doc_score = sum(doc_analysis[key] * doc_weights.get(key, 0) for key in doc_analysis)
+
+        # Final confidence score (weighted average)
+        total_weights = sum(structure_weights.values()) + sum(domain_weights.values()) + sum(doc_weights.values())
+
+        final_confidence = (structure_score + domain_score + doc_score) / total_weights
+
+        # Round to 2 decimal places
+        final_confidence = round(final_confidence, 2)
+
+        # Create detailed analysis
+        detailed_analysis = {
+            "file_path": file_path,
+            "analysis_time": time.time() - start_time,
+            "confidence_score": final_confidence,
+            "structure_analysis": {
+                "score": round(structure_score, 2),
+                "details": structure_analysis,
+                "weights": structure_weights,
+            },
+            "domain_analysis": {
+                "score": round(domain_score, 2),
+                "details": domain_analysis,
+                "weights": domain_weights,
+            },
+            "documentation_analysis": {
+                "score": round(doc_score, 2),
+                "details": doc_analysis,
+                "weights": doc_weights,
+            },
+            "recommendations": self._generate_recommendations(structure_analysis, domain_analysis, doc_analysis),
+        }
+
+        return final_confidence, detailed_analysis
+
+    def _generate_recommendations(
+        self, structure_analysis: Dict, domain_analysis: Dict, doc_analysis: Dict
+    ) -> List[str]:
+        """Generate improvement recommendations."""
+        recommendations = []
+
+        # Structure recommendations
+        if structure_analysis.get("docstring_score", 0) < 0.5:
+            recommendations.append("Add more docstrings to improve documentation coverage")
+
+        if structure_analysis.get("complexity_ratio", 0) < 0.7:
+            recommendations.append("Consider refactoring complex functions to improve maintainability")
+
+        if structure_analysis.get("naming_score", 0) < 0.7:
+            recommendations.append("Improve naming consistency (use consistent naming convention)")
+
+        # Domain recommendations
+        if domain_analysis.get("overall_relevance", 0) < 0.6:
+            recommendations.append("Add domain-specific terminology to improve relevance")
+
+        if domain_analysis.get("technical_density", 0) < 0.3:
+            recommendations.append("Increase technical vocabulary for better specification")
+
+        # Documentation recommendations
+        if doc_analysis.get("examples_present", 0) < 0.5:
+            recommendations.append("Add usage examples in docstrings for better understanding")
+
+        if doc_analysis.get("parameter_documentation", 0) < 0.5:
+            recommendations.append("Document function parameters and return values")
+
+        return recommendations[:5]  # Return top 5 recommendations
+
+    def validate_confidence_threshold(
+        self, confidence_score: float, threshold: float = 0.7, strict_mode: bool = False
+    ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        """
+        Validate confidence score against threshold.
+
+        Args:
+            confidence_score: Calculated confidence score
+            threshold: Minimum confidence threshold
+            strict_mode: Whether to use strict validation
+
+        Returns:
+            Validation result
+        """
+        if strict_mode:
+            # Strict mode: all scores must meet threshold
+            meets_threshold = confidence_score >= threshold
+        else:
+            # Normal mode: average score meets threshold
+            meets_threshold = confidence_score >= threshold
+
+        validation_result = {
+            "meets_threshold": meets_threshold,
+            "confidence_score": confidence_score,
+            "threshold": threshold,
+            "difference": confidence_score - threshold,
+            "recommendation": self._get_threshold_recommendation(confidence_score, threshold),
+        }
+
+        return validation_result
+
+    def _get_threshold_recommendation(self, confidence_score: float, threshold: float) -> str:
+        """Get recommendation based on confidence score."""
+        if confidence_score >= threshold:
+            if confidence_score >= 0.9:
+                return "Excellent confidence level - auto-spec generation recommended"
+            elif confidence_score >= 0.8:
+                return "Good confidence level - auto-spec generation recommended"
+            else:
+                return "Acceptable confidence level - auto-spec generation recommended"
+        else:
+            if confidence_score >= 0.6:
+                return "Marginal confidence level - manual review recommended"
+            elif confidence_score >= 0.4:
+                return "Low confidence level - significant improvements needed"
+            else:
+                return "Very low confidence level - complete redesign recommended"
+
+    def get_confidence_breakdown(self, confidence_score: float) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        """Get detailed breakdown of confidence score components."""
+        return {
+            "overall_score": confidence_score,
+            "interpretation": self._interpret_confidence_score(confidence_score),
+            "risk_level": self._get_risk_level(confidence_score),
+            "action_required": self._get_action_required(confidence_score),
+        }
+
+    def _interpret_confidence_score(self, score: float) -> str:
+        """Interpret confidence score meaning."""
+        if score >= 0.9:
+            return "Excellent - Very high likelihood of generating a quality SPEC"
+        elif score >= 0.8:
+            return "Good - High likelihood of generating a quality SPEC"
+        elif score >= 0.7:
+            return "Acceptable - Moderate likelihood of generating a quality SPEC"
+        elif score >= 0.6:
+            return "Marginal - Low likelihood of generating a quality SPEC"
+        elif score >= 0.4:
+            return "Poor - Very low likelihood of generating a quality SPEC"
+        else:
+            return "Very Poor - Extremely low likelihood of generating a quality SPEC"
+
+    def _get_risk_level(self, score: float) -> str:
+        """Get risk level based on confidence score."""
+        if score >= 0.8:
+            return "Low"
+        elif score >= 0.6:
+            return "Medium"
+        elif score >= 0.4:
+            return "High"
+        else:
+            return "Critical"
+
+    def _get_action_required(self, score: float) -> str:
+        """Get required action based on confidence score."""
+        if score >= 0.7:
+            return "Auto-generate SPEC"
+        elif score >= 0.5:
+            return "Generate SPEC with manual review"
+        else:
+            return "Do not auto-generate - require manual creation"
+
+
+# Utility function for backwards compatibility
+def calculate_completion_confidence(analysis: Dict[str, Any]) -> float:
+    """
+    Backwards compatibility function.
+
+    Args:
+        analysis: Code analysis result
+
+    Returns:
+        Confidence score
+    """
+    scorer = ConfidenceScoringSystem()
+
+    # Extract file path from analysis or use default
+    file_path = analysis.get("file_path", "dummy_file.py")
+
+    # Calculate confidence score
+    confidence, detailed_analysis = scorer.calculate_confidence_score(file_path)
+
+    return confidence