loom-agent 0.0.1__py3-none-any.whl → 0.0.2__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Potentially problematic release.


This version of loom-agent might be problematic. Click here for more details.

Files changed (38) hide show
  1. loom/builtin/tools/calculator.py +4 -0
  2. loom/builtin/tools/document_search.py +5 -0
  3. loom/builtin/tools/glob.py +4 -0
  4. loom/builtin/tools/grep.py +4 -0
  5. loom/builtin/tools/http_request.py +5 -0
  6. loom/builtin/tools/python_repl.py +5 -0
  7. loom/builtin/tools/read_file.py +4 -0
  8. loom/builtin/tools/task.py +5 -0
  9. loom/builtin/tools/web_search.py +4 -0
  10. loom/builtin/tools/write_file.py +4 -0
  11. loom/components/agent.py +121 -5
  12. loom/core/agent_executor.py +505 -320
  13. loom/core/compression_manager.py +17 -10
  14. loom/core/context_assembly.py +329 -0
  15. loom/core/events.py +414 -0
  16. loom/core/execution_context.py +119 -0
  17. loom/core/tool_orchestrator.py +383 -0
  18. loom/core/turn_state.py +188 -0
  19. loom/core/types.py +15 -4
  20. loom/interfaces/event_producer.py +172 -0
  21. loom/interfaces/tool.py +22 -1
  22. loom/security/__init__.py +13 -0
  23. loom/security/models.py +85 -0
  24. loom/security/path_validator.py +128 -0
  25. loom/security/validator.py +346 -0
  26. loom/tasks/PHASE_1_FOUNDATION/task_1.1_agent_events.md +121 -0
  27. loom/tasks/PHASE_1_FOUNDATION/task_1.2_streaming_api.md +521 -0
  28. loom/tasks/PHASE_1_FOUNDATION/task_1.3_context_assembler.md +606 -0
  29. loom/tasks/PHASE_2_CORE_FEATURES/task_2.1_tool_orchestrator.md +743 -0
  30. loom/tasks/PHASE_2_CORE_FEATURES/task_2.2_security_validator.md +676 -0
  31. loom/tasks/README.md +109 -0
  32. loom/tasks/__init__.py +11 -0
  33. loom/tasks/sql_placeholder.py +100 -0
  34. loom_agent-0.0.2.dist-info/METADATA +295 -0
  35. {loom_agent-0.0.1.dist-info → loom_agent-0.0.2.dist-info}/RECORD +37 -19
  36. loom_agent-0.0.1.dist-info/METADATA +0 -457
  37. {loom_agent-0.0.1.dist-info → loom_agent-0.0.2.dist-info}/WHEEL +0 -0
  38. {loom_agent-0.0.1.dist-info → loom_agent-0.0.2.dist-info}/licenses/LICENSE +0 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,676 @@
1
+ # Task 2.2: Implement SecurityValidator
2
+
3
+ **Status**: 🔄 In Progress
4
+ **Priority**: P1 (High)
5
+ **Estimated Time**: 2 days
6
+ **Started**: 2025-10-25
7
+ **Dependencies**: Task 2.1 (ToolOrchestrator)
8
+
9
+ ---
10
+
11
+ ## 📋 Overview
12
+
13
+ ### Objective
14
+
15
+ Implement a multi-layer security validation system that provides comprehensive protection for tool execution through 4 independent security layers.
16
+
17
+ ### Current Problem
18
+
19
+ ```python
20
+ # Loom 1.0 - Single layer security (PermissionManager only)
21
+ if permission_manager.check(tool, args) == "allow":
22
+ await tool.run(**args) # Execute
23
+
24
+ # Problems:
25
+ # 1. No category-based validation (destructive tools need extra checks)
26
+ # 2. No path security (tools can access any file)
27
+ # 3. No sandbox awareness
28
+ # 4. Binary allow/deny (no risk assessment)
29
+ ```
30
+
31
+ **Real Security Risks**:
32
+ ```python
33
+ # Risk 1: Destructive tool without confirmation
34
+ tool_call = ToolCall(name="write_file", arguments={
35
+ "path": "/etc/passwd", # System file!
36
+ "content": "malicious"
37
+ })
38
+ # Loom 1.0: May execute if permission policy allows ❌
39
+
40
+ # Risk 2: Path traversal attack
41
+ tool_call = ToolCall(name="read_file", arguments={
42
+ "path": "../../../etc/passwd" # Path traversal!
43
+ })
44
+ # Loom 1.0: No path validation ❌
45
+
46
+ # Risk 3: Network tool abuse
47
+ tool_call = ToolCall(name="http_request", arguments={
48
+ "url": "http://internal-service/admin", # Internal endpoint!
49
+ "method": "DELETE"
50
+ })
51
+ # Loom 1.0: No network filtering ❌
52
+ ```
53
+
54
+ ### Solution
55
+
56
+ ```python
57
+ # Loom 2.0 - 4-Layer Security Validation
58
+ class SecurityValidator:
59
+ async def validate(self, tool_call, tool, context):
60
+ # Layer 1: Permission Rules
61
+ decision = await self.layer1_permission_check(tool_call, tool)
62
+
63
+ # Layer 2: Tool Category Validation
64
+ decision = await self.layer2_category_check(tool, context)
65
+
66
+ # Layer 3: Path Security
67
+ decision = await self.layer3_path_security(tool_call, tool)
68
+
69
+ # Layer 4: Sandbox Support
70
+ decision = await self.layer4_sandbox_check(tool)
71
+
72
+ return SecurityDecision(allow=True/False, risk_level=..., reason=...)
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ ---
76
+
77
+ ## 🎯 Goals
78
+
79
+ 1. **Defense in Depth**: Multiple independent security layers
80
+ 2. **Risk Assessment**: Not just allow/deny, but risk scoring
81
+ 3. **Path Protection**: Prevent path traversal and unauthorized access
82
+ 4. **Category-Based**: Different rules for different tool categories
83
+ 5. **Auditability**: Log all security decisions
84
+
85
+ ---
86
+
87
+ ## 🏗️ Architecture
88
+
89
+ ### 4-Layer Security Model
90
+
91
+ ```
92
+ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
93
+ │ SecurityValidator │
94
+ │ │
95
+ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
96
+ │ │ Layer 1: Permission Rules │ │
97
+ │ │ - Policy-based access control │ │
98
+ │ │ - User confirmation for sensitive ops │ │
99
+ │ │ - Integration with PermissionManager │ │
100
+ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
101
+ │ ↓ │
102
+ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
103
+ │ │ Layer 2: Tool Category Validation │ │
104
+ │ │ - Destructive tools require confirmation │ │
105
+ │ │ - Network tools checked against whitelist │ │
106
+ │ │ - High-risk categories flagged │ │
107
+ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
108
+ │ ↓ │
109
+ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
110
+ │ │ Layer 3: Path Security │ │
111
+ │ │ - Path traversal detection │ │
112
+ │ │ - Working directory enforcement │ │
113
+ │ │ - System path protection │ │
114
+ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
115
+ │ ↓ │
116
+ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
117
+ │ │ Layer 4: Sandbox Support │ │
118
+ │ │ - Sandbox capability detection │ │
119
+ │ │ - Auto-sandbox for safe operations │ │
120
+ │ │ - Sandbox escape prevention │ │
121
+ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
122
+ │ ↓ │
123
+ │ SecurityDecision(allow, risk, reason) │
124
+ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
125
+ ```
126
+
127
+ ### Class Design
128
+
129
+ ```python
130
+ # loom/security/validator.py
131
+
132
+ from enum import Enum
133
+ from dataclasses import dataclass
134
+ from typing import Optional, List, Dict
135
+ from pathlib import Path
136
+
137
+
138
+ class RiskLevel(str, Enum):
139
+ """Security risk levels."""
140
+ LOW = "low"
141
+ MEDIUM = "medium"
142
+ HIGH = "high"
143
+ CRITICAL = "critical"
144
+
145
+
146
+ @dataclass
147
+ class SecurityDecision:
148
+ """Result of security validation."""
149
+ allow: bool
150
+ risk_level: RiskLevel
151
+ reason: str
152
+ failed_layers: List[str] = None
153
+ warnings: List[str] = None
154
+
155
+ @property
156
+ def is_safe(self) -> bool:
157
+ """Check if decision is safe to execute."""
158
+ return self.allow and self.risk_level in [RiskLevel.LOW, RiskLevel.MEDIUM]
159
+
160
+
161
+ class SecurityValidator:
162
+ """
163
+ Multi-layer security validator for tool execution.
164
+
165
+ Provides 4 layers of independent security checks:
166
+ 1. Permission rules (policy-based access control)
167
+ 2. Tool category validation (destructive/network/general)
168
+ 3. Path security (traversal detection, working dir enforcement)
169
+ 4. Sandbox support (automatic sandboxing for safe ops)
170
+
171
+ Example:
172
+ ```python
173
+ validator = SecurityValidator(
174
+ working_dir="/Users/project",
175
+ allowed_categories=["general", "network"],
176
+ require_confirmation_for=["destructive"]
177
+ )
178
+
179
+ decision = await validator.validate(
180
+ tool_call=ToolCall(name="write_file", arguments={...}),
181
+ tool=WriteFileTool(),
182
+ context={"user_approved": False}
183
+ )
184
+
185
+ if decision.allow:
186
+ await tool.run(**tool_call.arguments)
187
+ else:
188
+ print(f"Blocked: {decision.reason}")
189
+ ```
190
+ """
191
+
192
+ def __init__(
193
+ self,
194
+ working_dir: Optional[Path] = None,
195
+ allowed_categories: Optional[List[str]] = None,
196
+ require_confirmation_for: Optional[List[str]] = None,
197
+ permission_manager: Optional[PermissionManager] = None,
198
+ enable_sandbox: bool = True
199
+ ):
200
+ self.working_dir = working_dir or Path.cwd()
201
+ self.allowed_categories = allowed_categories or ["general", "network", "destructive"]
202
+ self.require_confirmation_for = require_confirmation_for or ["destructive"]
203
+ self.permission_manager = permission_manager
204
+ self.enable_sandbox = enable_sandbox
205
+ self.audit_log: List[Dict] = []
206
+
207
+ async def validate(
208
+ self,
209
+ tool_call: ToolCall,
210
+ tool: BaseTool,
211
+ context: Optional[Dict] = None
212
+ ) -> SecurityDecision:
213
+ """
214
+ Validate tool execution through all 4 security layers.
215
+
216
+ Args:
217
+ tool_call: Tool call to validate
218
+ tool: Tool instance
219
+ context: Additional context (user_approved, etc.)
220
+
221
+ Returns:
222
+ SecurityDecision with allow/deny and risk assessment
223
+ """
224
+ context = context or {}
225
+ failed_layers = []
226
+ warnings = []
227
+ max_risk = RiskLevel.LOW
228
+
229
+ # Layer 1: Permission Rules
230
+ layer1_result = await self.layer1_permission_check(tool_call, tool, context)
231
+ if not layer1_result.allow:
232
+ failed_layers.append("permission")
233
+ max_risk = max(max_risk, layer1_result.risk_level)
234
+
235
+ # Layer 2: Tool Category Validation
236
+ layer2_result = await self.layer2_category_check(tool, context)
237
+ if not layer2_result.allow:
238
+ failed_layers.append("category")
239
+ max_risk = max(max_risk, layer2_result.risk_level)
240
+
241
+ # Layer 3: Path Security
242
+ layer3_result = await self.layer3_path_security(tool_call, tool)
243
+ if not layer3_result.allow:
244
+ failed_layers.append("path_security")
245
+ max_risk = max(max_risk, layer3_result.risk_level)
246
+
247
+ # Layer 4: Sandbox Support
248
+ layer4_result = await self.layer4_sandbox_check(tool, context)
249
+ if layer4_result.warnings:
250
+ warnings.extend(layer4_result.warnings)
251
+
252
+ # Aggregate decision
253
+ allow = len(failed_layers) == 0
254
+ reason = self._build_reason(failed_layers, warnings)
255
+
256
+ decision = SecurityDecision(
257
+ allow=allow,
258
+ risk_level=max_risk,
259
+ reason=reason,
260
+ failed_layers=failed_layers,
261
+ warnings=warnings
262
+ )
263
+
264
+ # Audit log
265
+ self._log_decision(tool_call, tool, decision)
266
+
267
+ return decision
268
+
269
+ async def layer1_permission_check(
270
+ self,
271
+ tool_call: ToolCall,
272
+ tool: BaseTool,
273
+ context: Dict
274
+ ) -> SecurityDecision:
275
+ """
276
+ Layer 1: Check permission policy.
277
+
278
+ Integrates with existing PermissionManager.
279
+ """
280
+ ...
281
+
282
+ async def layer2_category_check(
283
+ self,
284
+ tool: BaseTool,
285
+ context: Dict
286
+ ) -> SecurityDecision:
287
+ """
288
+ Layer 2: Validate tool category.
289
+
290
+ - Destructive tools require confirmation
291
+ - Network tools checked against whitelist
292
+ - Unknown categories treated as high-risk
293
+ """
294
+ ...
295
+
296
+ async def layer3_path_security(
297
+ self,
298
+ tool_call: ToolCall,
299
+ tool: BaseTool
300
+ ) -> SecurityDecision:
301
+ """
302
+ Layer 3: Validate file paths.
303
+
304
+ - Detect path traversal attempts (../)
305
+ - Enforce working directory boundaries
306
+ - Block system paths (/etc, /sys, etc.)
307
+ """
308
+ ...
309
+
310
+ async def layer4_sandbox_check(
311
+ self,
312
+ tool: BaseTool,
313
+ context: Dict
314
+ ) -> SecurityDecision:
315
+ """
316
+ Layer 4: Check sandbox support.
317
+
318
+ - Recommend sandbox for safe operations
319
+ - Warn if sandbox unavailable for risky ops
320
+ """
321
+ ...
322
+
323
+ def _build_reason(self, failed_layers: List[str], warnings: List[str]) -> str:
324
+ """Build human-readable reason for decision."""
325
+ ...
326
+
327
+ def _log_decision(
328
+ self,
329
+ tool_call: ToolCall,
330
+ tool: BaseTool,
331
+ decision: SecurityDecision
332
+ ):
333
+ """Log security decision for audit trail."""
334
+ ...
335
+
336
+ def get_audit_log(self) -> List[Dict]:
337
+ """Get security audit log."""
338
+ return self.audit_log
339
+ ```
340
+
341
+ ---
342
+
343
+ ## 📝 Implementation Steps
344
+
345
+ ### Step 1: Create Security Models
346
+
347
+ **File**: `loom/security/models.py` (new)
348
+
349
+ ```python
350
+ from enum import Enum
351
+ from dataclasses import dataclass
352
+ from typing import List, Optional
353
+
354
+
355
+ class RiskLevel(str, Enum):
356
+ LOW = "low"
357
+ MEDIUM = "medium"
358
+ HIGH = "high"
359
+ CRITICAL = "critical"
360
+
361
+
362
+ @dataclass
363
+ class SecurityDecision:
364
+ allow: bool
365
+ risk_level: RiskLevel
366
+ reason: str
367
+ failed_layers: List[str] = None
368
+ warnings: List[str] = None
369
+
370
+ @property
371
+ def is_safe(self) -> bool:
372
+ return self.allow and self.risk_level in [RiskLevel.LOW, RiskLevel.MEDIUM]
373
+
374
+
375
+ @dataclass
376
+ class PathSecurityResult:
377
+ is_safe: bool
378
+ normalized_path: str
379
+ warnings: List[str]
380
+ violations: List[str]
381
+ ```
382
+
383
+ ### Step 2: Implement Path Security Validator
384
+
385
+ **File**: `loom/security/path_validator.py` (new)
386
+
387
+ ```python
388
+ from pathlib import Path
389
+ from typing import List, Optional
390
+
391
+ SYSTEM_PATHS = [
392
+ "/etc",
393
+ "/sys",
394
+ "/proc",
395
+ "/dev",
396
+ "/boot",
397
+ "/root",
398
+ "/var/log",
399
+ ]
400
+
401
+
402
+ class PathSecurityValidator:
403
+ """Validate file paths for security."""
404
+
405
+ def __init__(self, working_dir: Path):
406
+ self.working_dir = working_dir.resolve()
407
+
408
+ def validate_path(self, path: str) -> PathSecurityResult:
409
+ """
410
+ Validate a file path for security issues.
411
+
412
+ Checks:
413
+ 1. Path traversal (../)
414
+ 2. Absolute path outside working dir
415
+ 3. System paths
416
+ 4. Symlink attacks (future)
417
+ """
418
+ violations = []
419
+ warnings = []
420
+
421
+ # Detect path traversal
422
+ if ".." in path:
423
+ violations.append("Path traversal detected")
424
+
425
+ # Resolve and check boundaries
426
+ try:
427
+ resolved = (self.working_dir / path).resolve()
428
+
429
+ # Check if within working dir
430
+ if not str(resolved).startswith(str(self.working_dir)):
431
+ violations.append(f"Path outside working directory: {resolved}")
432
+
433
+ # Check system paths
434
+ for sys_path in SYSTEM_PATHS:
435
+ if str(resolved).startswith(sys_path):
436
+ violations.append(f"System path access denied: {sys_path}")
437
+
438
+ except Exception as e:
439
+ violations.append(f"Path resolution failed: {e}")
440
+
441
+ is_safe = len(violations) == 0
442
+
443
+ return PathSecurityResult(
444
+ is_safe=is_safe,
445
+ normalized_path=str(resolved) if is_safe else path,
446
+ warnings=warnings,
447
+ violations=violations
448
+ )
449
+ ```
450
+
451
+ ### Step 3: Implement SecurityValidator
452
+
453
+ **File**: `loom/security/validator.py` (new)
454
+
455
+ Main implementation with all 4 layers.
456
+
457
+ ### Step 4: Integrate into ToolOrchestrator
458
+
459
+ **File**: `loom/core/tool_orchestrator.py` (modify)
460
+
461
+ ```python
462
+ # Add SecurityValidator support
463
+ class ToolOrchestrator:
464
+ def __init__(
465
+ self,
466
+ tools: Dict[str, BaseTool],
467
+ permission_manager: Optional[PermissionManager] = None,
468
+ security_validator: Optional[SecurityValidator] = None, # 🆕
469
+ max_parallel: int = 5
470
+ ):
471
+ self.tools = tools
472
+ self.permission_manager = permission_manager
473
+ self.security_validator = security_validator # 🆕
474
+ self.max_parallel = max_parallel
475
+
476
+ async def execute_one(self, tool_call: ToolCall):
477
+ # ... existing code ...
478
+
479
+ # 🆕 Security validation
480
+ if self.security_validator:
481
+ decision = await self.security_validator.validate(
482
+ tool_call=tool_call,
483
+ tool=tool,
484
+ context={}
485
+ )
486
+
487
+ if not decision.allow:
488
+ # Emit security error event
489
+ yield AgentEvent(
490
+ type=AgentEventType.TOOL_ERROR,
491
+ tool_result=ToolResult(
492
+ tool_call_id=tool_call.id,
493
+ tool_name=tool_call.name,
494
+ content=f"Security check failed: {decision.reason}",
495
+ is_error=True
496
+ ),
497
+ error=SecurityError(decision.reason)
498
+ )
499
+ return
500
+
501
+ # ... continue with execution ...
502
+ ```
503
+
504
+ ---
505
+
506
+ ## 🧪 Testing Requirements
507
+
508
+ ### Unit Tests
509
+
510
+ **File**: `tests/unit/test_security_validator.py`
511
+
512
+ **Test cases** (target 20-25 tests):
513
+
514
+ ```python
515
+ class TestSecurityDecision:
516
+ def test_decision_creation(self):
517
+ """Test SecurityDecision creation."""
518
+ ...
519
+
520
+ def test_is_safe_property(self):
521
+ """Test is_safe property logic."""
522
+ ...
523
+
524
+
525
+ class TestPathSecurityValidator:
526
+ def test_path_traversal_detection(self):
527
+ """Test ../ detection."""
528
+ ...
529
+
530
+ def test_absolute_path_outside_workdir(self):
531
+ """Test absolute path restrictions."""
532
+ ...
533
+
534
+ def test_system_path_blocking(self):
535
+ """Test system path protection."""
536
+ ...
537
+
538
+ def test_safe_relative_path(self):
539
+ """Test safe relative paths."""
540
+ ...
541
+
542
+
543
+ class TestLayer1PermissionCheck:
544
+ async def test_permission_allow(self):
545
+ """Test permission layer allows valid tools."""
546
+ ...
547
+
548
+ async def test_permission_deny(self):
549
+ """Test permission layer blocks denied tools."""
550
+ ...
551
+
552
+
553
+ class TestLayer2CategoryCheck:
554
+ async def test_general_category_allowed(self):
555
+ """Test general category tools allowed."""
556
+ ...
557
+
558
+ async def test_destructive_requires_confirmation(self):
559
+ """Test destructive tools require confirmation."""
560
+ ...
561
+
562
+ async def test_unknown_category_high_risk(self):
563
+ """Test unknown categories flagged as high risk."""
564
+ ...
565
+
566
+
567
+ class TestLayer3PathSecurity:
568
+ async def test_blocks_path_traversal(self):
569
+ """Test path traversal blocked."""
570
+ ...
571
+
572
+ async def test_blocks_system_paths(self):
573
+ """Test system path access blocked."""
574
+ ...
575
+
576
+ async def test_allows_safe_paths(self):
577
+ """Test safe paths allowed."""
578
+ ...
579
+
580
+
581
+ class TestLayer4SandboxCheck:
582
+ async def test_sandbox_recommendation(self):
583
+ """Test sandbox recommended for safe ops."""
584
+ ...
585
+
586
+
587
+ class TestSecurityValidatorIntegration:
588
+ async def test_all_layers_pass(self):
589
+ """Test all layers passing."""
590
+ ...
591
+
592
+ async def test_single_layer_failure(self):
593
+ """Test single layer failure blocks execution."""
594
+ ...
595
+
596
+ async def test_multiple_layer_failures(self):
597
+ """Test multiple layer failures."""
598
+ ...
599
+
600
+ async def test_audit_logging(self):
601
+ """Test audit log captures decisions."""
602
+ ...
603
+
604
+
605
+ class TestToolOrchestrationWithSecurity:
606
+ async def test_security_blocks_dangerous_tool(self):
607
+ """Test security validator blocks dangerous tools."""
608
+ ...
609
+
610
+ async def test_security_allows_safe_tool(self):
611
+ """Test security validator allows safe tools."""
612
+ ...
613
+ ```
614
+
615
+ ---
616
+
617
+ ## ✅ Acceptance Criteria
618
+
619
+ - [ ] SecurityDecision model implemented
620
+ - [ ] PathSecurityValidator implemented
621
+ - [ ] SecurityValidator implemented with 4 layers
622
+ - [ ] Layer 1: Permission check
623
+ - [ ] Layer 2: Category validation
624
+ - [ ] Layer 3: Path security
625
+ - [ ] Layer 4: Sandbox support
626
+ - [ ] Integrated into ToolOrchestrator
627
+ - [ ] Test coverage ≥ 80%
628
+ - [ ] 20-25 unit tests
629
+ - [ ] All tests pass
630
+ - [ ] Audit logging works
631
+ - [ ] Path traversal prevented
632
+ - [ ] System paths protected
633
+ - [ ] Backward compatible
634
+
635
+ ---
636
+
637
+ ## 📦 Deliverables
638
+
639
+ 1. **Core Implementation**
640
+ - [ ] `loom/security/models.py` (~100 lines)
641
+ - [ ] `loom/security/path_validator.py` (~150 lines)
642
+ - [ ] `loom/security/validator.py` (~400 lines)
643
+
644
+ 2. **Integration**
645
+ - [ ] Modified `loom/core/tool_orchestrator.py`
646
+ - [ ] Modified `loom/core/agent_executor.py`
647
+
648
+ 3. **Tests**
649
+ - [ ] `tests/unit/test_security_validator.py` (20-25 tests)
650
+ - [ ] All tests passing
651
+
652
+ 4. **Documentation**
653
+ - [ ] Code docstrings complete
654
+ - [ ] Example usage
655
+ - [ ] `docs/TASK_2.2_COMPLETION_SUMMARY.md`
656
+
657
+ ---
658
+
659
+ ## 🔍 Testing Checklist
660
+
661
+ Before marking as complete:
662
+
663
+ - [ ] All unit tests pass
664
+ - [ ] Path traversal attacks blocked
665
+ - [ ] System paths protected
666
+ - [ ] Audit log captures decisions
667
+ - [ ] Integration with orchestrator works
668
+ - [ ] No regressions in existing tests
669
+ - [ ] Code coverage ≥ 80%
670
+ - [ ] Documentation complete
671
+
672
+ ---
673
+
674
+ **Created**: 2025-10-25
675
+ **Last Updated**: 2025-10-25
676
+ **Status**: 🔄 In Progress