lite-kits 0.1.1__py3-none-any.whl → 0.3.1__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (63) hide show
  1. lite_kits/__init__.py +56 -4
  2. lite_kits/cli.py +696 -185
  3. lite_kits/core/__init__.py +6 -0
  4. lite_kits/core/banner.py +1 -1
  5. lite_kits/core/conflict_checker.py +115 -0
  6. lite_kits/core/detector.py +140 -0
  7. lite_kits/core/installer.py +236 -351
  8. lite_kits/core/manifest.py +146 -146
  9. lite_kits/core/validator.py +146 -0
  10. lite_kits/kits/README.md +6 -6
  11. lite_kits/kits/dev/README.md +241 -241
  12. lite_kits/kits/dev/{claude/commands → commands/.claude}/audit.md +143 -143
  13. lite_kits/kits/dev/{claude/commands → commands/.claude}/cleanup.md +2 -2
  14. lite_kits/kits/{git/claude/commands → dev/commands/.claude}/commit.md +2 -2
  15. lite_kits/kits/{project/claude/commands → dev/commands/.claude}/orient.md +3 -4
  16. lite_kits/kits/{git/claude/commands → dev/commands/.claude}/pr.md +1 -1
  17. lite_kits/kits/{git/claude/commands → dev/commands/.claude}/review.md +202 -202
  18. lite_kits/kits/{project/claude/commands → dev/commands/.claude}/stats.md +162 -162
  19. lite_kits/kits/{project/github/prompts → dev/commands/.github}/audit.prompt.md +143 -143
  20. lite_kits/kits/{git/github/prompts → dev/commands/.github}/cleanup.prompt.md +2 -2
  21. lite_kits/kits/{git/github/prompts → dev/commands/.github}/commit.prompt.md +2 -2
  22. lite_kits/kits/dev/{github/prompts → commands/.github}/orient.prompt.md +3 -4
  23. lite_kits/kits/{git/github/prompts → dev/commands/.github}/pr.prompt.md +1 -1
  24. lite_kits/kits/{git/github/prompts → dev/commands/.github}/review.prompt.md +202 -202
  25. lite_kits/kits/dev/{github/prompts → commands/.github}/stats.prompt.md +163 -163
  26. lite_kits/kits/kits.yaml +497 -180
  27. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/README.md +6 -6
  28. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/{claude/commands → commands/.claude}/sync.md +331 -331
  29. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/{github/prompts → commands/.github}/sync.prompt.md +73 -69
  30. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/memory/git-worktrees-protocol.md +370 -370
  31. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/memory/parallel-work-protocol.md +536 -536
  32. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/memory/pr-workflow-guide.md +275 -275
  33. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/templates/collaboration-structure/README.md +166 -166
  34. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/templates/decision.md +79 -79
  35. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/templates/handoff.md +95 -95
  36. lite_kits/kits/multiagent/templates/session-log.md +68 -68
  37. lite_kits-0.3.1.dist-info/METADATA +259 -0
  38. lite_kits-0.3.1.dist-info/RECORD +41 -0
  39. {lite_kits-0.1.1.dist-info → lite_kits-0.3.1.dist-info}/licenses/LICENSE +21 -21
  40. lite_kits/kits/dev/claude/commands/commit.md +0 -612
  41. lite_kits/kits/dev/claude/commands/orient.md +0 -146
  42. lite_kits/kits/dev/claude/commands/pr.md +0 -593
  43. lite_kits/kits/dev/claude/commands/review.md +0 -202
  44. lite_kits/kits/dev/claude/commands/stats.md +0 -162
  45. lite_kits/kits/dev/github/prompts/audit.prompt.md +0 -143
  46. lite_kits/kits/dev/github/prompts/cleanup.prompt.md +0 -382
  47. lite_kits/kits/dev/github/prompts/commit.prompt.md +0 -591
  48. lite_kits/kits/dev/github/prompts/pr.prompt.md +0 -603
  49. lite_kits/kits/dev/github/prompts/review.prompt.md +0 -202
  50. lite_kits/kits/git/README.md +0 -365
  51. lite_kits/kits/git/claude/commands/cleanup.md +0 -361
  52. lite_kits/kits/git/scripts/bash/get-git-context.sh +0 -208
  53. lite_kits/kits/git/scripts/powershell/Get-GitContext.ps1 +0 -242
  54. lite_kits/kits/project/README.md +0 -228
  55. lite_kits/kits/project/claude/commands/audit.md +0 -143
  56. lite_kits/kits/project/claude/commands/review.md +0 -112
  57. lite_kits/kits/project/github/prompts/orient.prompt.md +0 -150
  58. lite_kits/kits/project/github/prompts/review.prompt.md +0 -112
  59. lite_kits/kits/project/github/prompts/stats.prompt.md +0 -163
  60. lite_kits-0.1.1.dist-info/METADATA +0 -447
  61. lite_kits-0.1.1.dist-info/RECORD +0 -58
  62. {lite_kits-0.1.1.dist-info → lite_kits-0.3.1.dist-info}/WHEEL +0 -0
  63. {lite_kits-0.1.1.dist-info → lite_kits-0.3.1.dist-info}/entry_points.txt +0 -0
@@ -1,202 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- description: Review staged changes against best practices
3
- ---
4
-
5
- # Code Review of Staged Changes
6
-
7
- **Purpose**: Review staged git changes for quality, best practices, and potential issues before committing.
8
-
9
- ## Execution Steps
10
-
11
- Execute the following steps to review staged changes:
12
-
13
- ### 1. Check Staged Files
14
-
15
- ```bash
16
- # Get list of staged files with status
17
- git diff --staged --name-status
18
- ```
19
-
20
- **If no files are staged**:
21
- - Inform user that nothing is staged
22
- - Suggest running `git add` or `@terminal /commit` to stage and commit together
23
- - Exit gracefully
24
-
25
- ### 2. Analyze Staged Changes
26
-
27
- ```bash
28
- # Get the actual diff with context
29
- git diff --staged
30
- ```
31
-
32
- ### 3. Review Changes
33
-
34
- Analyze the diff output for:
35
-
36
- **✅ Good Practices to Acknowledge**:
37
- - Clear, descriptive function/variable names
38
- - Appropriate comments where needed
39
- - Consistent formatting
40
- - Type hints (Python) or type annotations
41
- - Test coverage for new code
42
- - Error handling
43
- - Input validation
44
-
45
- **⚠️ Issues to Flag**:
46
- - **Security**:
47
- - Hardcoded credentials or API keys
48
- - SQL injection vulnerabilities
49
- - XSS vulnerabilities
50
- - Unsafe deserialization
51
- - Missing authentication/authorization checks
52
-
53
- - **Code Quality**:
54
- - TODOs or FIXMEs (should be tracked in issues)
55
- - Commented-out code blocks
56
- - Magic numbers without explanation
57
- - Overly complex functions (>50 lines)
58
- - Duplicate code patterns
59
- - Inconsistent naming conventions
60
-
61
- - **Best Practices**:
62
- - Missing error handling
63
- - No logging for important operations
64
- - Hardcoded configuration values
65
- - Missing input validation
66
- - Unused imports or variables
67
- - Missing docstrings for public APIs
68
-
69
- ### 4. Present Review Results
70
-
71
- Format output as follows:
72
-
73
- ```
74
- ## Code Review Results
75
-
76
- **Staged files**: [count]
77
- [list files with status: A=added, M=modified, D=deleted]
78
-
79
- **Summary of changes**:
80
- [brief description of what's being changed]
81
-
82
- ===========================================================
83
- **✅ Good Practices Found:**
84
- ===========================================================
85
-
86
- [List positive findings, grouped by file]
87
- - [file]: [specific good practice observed]
88
-
89
- ===========================================================
90
- **⚠️ Suggestions for Improvement:**
91
- ===========================================================
92
-
93
- [List issues/suggestions, grouped by file with line numbers if possible]
94
- - [file]:[line]: [specific issue and suggested fix]
95
-
96
- ===========================================================
97
- **🔒 Security Check:**
98
- ===========================================================
99
-
100
- [Report any security concerns or confirm none found]
101
- - ✓ No hardcoded credentials detected
102
- - ✓ No obvious security vulnerabilities
103
- - ⚠ [Any security concerns]
104
-
105
- ===========================================================
106
- **📊 Overall Assessment:**
107
- ===========================================================
108
-
109
- [One of: "Ready to commit", "Ready with minor suggestions", "Needs changes"]
110
-
111
- [Brief summary of overall code quality]
112
-
113
- **Recommendation**: [Approve / Address suggestions / Do not commit]
114
- ```
115
-
116
- ### 5. Handle User Response
117
-
118
- After presenting results, wait for user action. They may:
119
- - Proceed with commit anyway
120
- - Make changes and re-review
121
- - Cancel the review
122
-
123
- ## Example Output
124
-
125
- ```
126
- ## Code Review Results
127
-
128
- **Staged files**: 3
129
- - A src/auth.py (new file)
130
- - M src/models.py (modified)
131
- - A tests/test_auth.py (new file)
132
-
133
- **Summary of changes**:
134
- Adding user authentication system with bcrypt password hashing
135
- and JWT token generation.
136
-
137
- ===========================================================
138
- **✅ Good Practices Found:**
139
- ===========================================================
140
-
141
- - src/auth.py: Clear function names (hash_password, verify_password)
142
- - src/auth.py: Type hints used throughout
143
- - src/auth.py: Comprehensive docstrings for all functions
144
- - src/models.py: Proper SQLAlchemy relationship definitions
145
- - tests/test_auth.py: Good test coverage with fixtures
146
-
147
- ===========================================================
148
- **⚠️ Suggestions for Improvement:**
149
- ===========================================================
150
-
151
- - src/auth.py:45: Consider extracting hash_password to utils module
152
- Current: Function in auth.py
153
- Suggest: Move to src/utils/crypto.py for reusability
154
-
155
- - src/models.py:12: TODO comment present
156
- Line: "# TODO: Add password reset functionality"
157
- Suggest: Create GitHub issue and reference it in comment
158
-
159
- - tests/test_auth.py:67: Missing edge case test
160
- Suggest: Add test for empty password input
161
-
162
- - src/auth.py:23: Magic number for token expiration
163
- Current: expires_delta = timedelta(hours=24)
164
- Suggest: Move to config file or environment variable
165
-
166
- ===========================================================
167
- **🔒 Security Check:**
168
- ===========================================================
169
-
170
- ✓ No hardcoded credentials detected
171
- ✓ Using bcrypt for password hashing (good choice!)
172
- ✓ JWT tokens generated securely
173
- ⚠ Consider adding rate limiting to prevent brute force attacks
174
-
175
- ===========================================================
176
- **📊 Overall Assessment:**
177
- ===========================================================
178
-
179
- **Status**: Ready with minor suggestions
180
-
181
- The code follows good practices with proper type hints, docstrings,
182
- and test coverage. The suggestions above are minor improvements that
183
- can be addressed now or in future iterations.
184
-
185
- **Recommendation**: Approve and commit - suggestions are non-blocking
186
- ```
187
-
188
- ## Important Notes
189
-
190
- - This command is **read-only** - it never modifies files
191
- - Focus on **actionable feedback** - be specific about what to change
192
- - Be **encouraging** - acknowledge good practices
193
- - **Security first** - always check for security issues
194
- - Keep review **concise** - don't overwhelm with minor issues
195
- - **Respect the agent's work** - balance critique with acknowledgment
196
-
197
- ## Integration with Other Commands
198
-
199
- - Run `@terminal /review` before `@terminal /commit` to catch issues early
200
- - Use after making changes and staging them with `git add`
201
- - Combine with `@terminal /pr` workflow - review before creating PR
202
- - Works great in multi-agent workflows (one agent reviews another's work)
@@ -1,365 +0,0 @@
1
- # Git Kit
2
-
3
- **Status**: ✅ Recommended (Default)
4
-
5
- Git workflow automation with smart commits, PR creation, code review, and cleanup operations. Includes ASCII visualization for better readability.
6
-
7
- ## What It Adds
8
-
9
- ### Commands
10
-
11
- | Command | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot | Description |
12
- |---------|-------------|----------------|-------------|
13
- | `/commit` | 🚧 | 🚧 | Smart commit with agent attribution |
14
- | `/pr` | 🚧 | 🚧 | Create PR with auto-generated description |
15
- | `/review` | 🚧 | 🚧 | Review staged changes against best practices |
16
- | `/cleanup` | 🚧 | 🚧 | Clean merged branches, stale worktrees |
17
-
18
- 🚧 = Coming Soon
19
-
20
- ## Installation
21
-
22
- ### As part of recommended kits:
23
- ```bash
24
- lite-kits install -Recommended # project + git
25
- ```
26
-
27
- ### Individually:
28
- ```bash
29
- lite-kits install -Kit git
30
- ```
31
-
32
- ## What Gets Installed
33
-
34
- ```
35
- your-project/
36
- ├── .claude/commands/ # If Claude Code detected
37
- │ ├── commit.md
38
- │ ├── pr.md
39
- │ ├── review.md
40
- │ └── cleanup.md
41
- └── .github/prompts/ # If GitHub Copilot detected
42
- ├── commit.prompt.md
43
- ├── pr.prompt.md
44
- ├── review.prompt.md
45
- └── cleanup.prompt.md
46
- ```
47
-
48
- **Note**: Vanilla spec-kit files are **never modified** - only new files are added.
49
-
50
- ## Commands
51
-
52
- ### `/commit` - Smart Commit (Coming Soon)
53
-
54
- **Purpose**: Generate smart commit messages with agent attribution.
55
-
56
- **What it will do**:
57
- 1. Run `git status` to see staged files
58
- 2. Run `git diff --staged` to see changes
59
- 3. Analyze changes and generate conventional commit message
60
- 4. Add agent attribution footer
61
- 5. Execute commit with generated message
62
-
63
- **Example usage** (planned):
64
- ```
65
- /commit
66
-
67
- ## Smart Commit
68
-
69
- **Staged files**: 3
70
- - src/auth.py (new)
71
- - src/models.py (modified)
72
- - tests/test_auth.py (new)
73
-
74
- **Changes detected**:
75
- - New feature: Authentication system
76
- - Added User model
77
- - Comprehensive test coverage
78
-
79
- **Suggested commit message**:
80
-
81
- feat: Add user authentication system
82
-
83
- Implements bcrypt password hashing, JWT token generation,
84
- and session management. Includes User model and comprehensive
85
- tests with 94% coverage.
86
-
87
- via claude-sonnet-4.5 @ claude-code
88
-
89
- **Confirm?** (y/n): y
90
-
91
- [dev/003-auth a1b2c3d] feat: Add user authentication system
92
- 3 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
93
- create mode 100644 src/auth.py
94
- create mode 100644 tests/test_auth.py
95
- ```
96
-
97
- **Benefits**:
98
- - Consistent commit message format
99
- - Auto-attribution for AI-generated code
100
- - Follows conventional commits
101
- - Saves time thinking about messages
102
-
103
- ---
104
-
105
- ### `/review` - Code Review (Coming Soon)
106
-
107
- **Purpose**: Review staged changes against best practices and project standards.
108
-
109
- **What it will do**:
110
- 1. Run `git diff --staged` to see changes
111
- 2. Check changes against common best practices
112
- 3. Identify potential code smells
113
- 4. Suggest improvements
114
- 5. Verify consistent formatting
115
- 6. Check for common issues (hardcoded secrets, TODO comments, etc.)
116
-
117
- **Example usage** (planned):
118
- ```
119
- /review
120
-
121
- ## Code Review
122
-
123
- **Staged files**: 3
124
- - src/auth.py (new)
125
- - src/models.py (modified)
126
- - tests/test_auth.py (new)
127
-
128
- **Analysis**:
129
-
130
- ✅ **Good practices**:
131
- - Clear function names and docstrings
132
- - Comprehensive test coverage (94%)
133
- - Type hints used throughout
134
- - No hardcoded credentials
135
-
136
- ⚠ **Suggestions**:
137
- - src/auth.py:45: Consider extracting hash_password to utils
138
- - src/models.py:12: TODO comment should be tracked in issue
139
- - tests/test_auth.py: Add edge case for empty passwords
140
-
141
- **Overall**: Ready to commit with minor suggestions
142
-
143
- **Approve?** (y/n): y
144
- ```
145
-
146
- **Benefits**:
147
- - Catch issues before committing
148
- - Consistent code quality
149
- - Learn best practices
150
- - Agent-to-agent code review support
151
-
152
- ---
153
-
154
- ### `/pr` - Create Pull Request (Coming Soon)
155
-
156
- **Purpose**: Create PR with auto-generated description from commits.
157
-
158
- **What it will do**:
159
- 1. Check current branch against base (main/develop)
160
- 2. List all commits that will be in PR
161
- 3. Analyze changes across all commits
162
- 4. Generate PR title and description
163
- 5. Create PR using `gh pr create`
164
-
165
- **Example usage** (planned):
166
- ```
167
- /pr
168
-
169
- ## Create Pull Request
170
-
171
- **Branch**: dev/003-auth → main
172
- **Commits**: 5
173
-
174
- **Changes summary**:
175
- - Added authentication system (bcrypt + JWT)
176
- - Created User model with validation
177
- - Added login/logout API endpoints
178
- - Comprehensive test suite (94% coverage)
179
- - Updated API documentation
180
-
181
- **Generated PR**:
182
-
183
- Title: feat: Add user authentication system
184
-
185
- Body:
186
- ## Summary
187
- - Implements bcrypt password hashing
188
- - JWT token generation and validation
189
- - Session management
190
- - User model with SQLAlchemy
191
-
192
- ## Changes
193
- - `src/auth.py` - Authentication logic
194
- - `src/models.py` - User model
195
- - `src/api/auth_routes.py` - Login/logout endpoints
196
- - `tests/test_auth.py` - Test suite (94% coverage)
197
-
198
- ## Test Plan
199
- - [x] Unit tests passing (24/24)
200
- - [x] Manual testing of login flow
201
- - [x] Password validation tested
202
- - [ ] Security review pending
203
-
204
- ## Related
205
- - Implements: specs/003-user-auth/spec.md
206
- - Closes: #42
207
-
208
- 🤖 Generated with spec-kit-multiagent
209
- via claude-sonnet-4.5 @ claude-code
210
-
211
- **Create PR?** (y/n): y
212
-
213
- ✓ Pull request created: https://github.com/user/repo/pull/15
214
- ```
215
-
216
- ---
217
-
218
- ### `/cleanup` - Git Cleanup (Coming Soon)
219
-
220
- **Purpose**: Clean up merged branches, stale worktrees, and old features.
221
-
222
- **What it will do**:
223
- 1. Detect merged branches (local and remote)
224
- 2. Find stale worktrees
225
- 3. Identify old feature directories in `specs/`
226
- 4. Suggest safe cleanup actions
227
- 5. Execute cleanup with confirmation
228
-
229
- **Example usage** (planned):
230
- ```
231
- /cleanup
232
-
233
- ## Git Cleanup
234
-
235
- **Merged branches** (safe to delete):
236
- - dev/001-init (merged 2 weeks ago)
237
- - dev/002-blog (merged 1 week ago)
238
- - feature/old-experiment (merged 3 months ago)
239
-
240
- **Stale worktrees**:
241
- - ../blog-backend (branch merged, worktree orphaned)
242
-
243
- **Old feature specs**:
244
- - specs/001-init/ (merged, archived?)
245
-
246
- **Cleanup plan**:
247
- 1. Delete 3 merged local branches
248
- 2. Delete 2 merged remote branches
249
- 3. Remove 1 stale worktree
250
- 4. Suggest archiving specs/001-init/
251
-
252
- **Disk space freed**: ~45 MB
253
-
254
- **Proceed?** (y/n): y
255
-
256
- ✓ Deleted branch dev/001-init
257
- ✓ Deleted branch dev/002-blog
258
- ✓ Deleted branch feature/old-experiment
259
- ✓ Deleted remote branch origin/dev/001-init
260
- ✓ Removed stale worktree ../blog-backend
261
- ⚠ Manual action: Archive specs/001-init/ to specs/.archive/
262
-
263
- **Cleanup complete!**
264
- ```
265
-
266
- ---
267
-
268
- ## ASCII Visualization Examples
269
-
270
- Git-kit emphasizes visual output because AI agents are good at generating ASCII art and it makes git status much easier to understand.
271
-
272
- ### Branch Relationships
273
- ```
274
- main ──────────┬──────────> origin/main (synced)
275
-
276
- ├─ develop ──> origin/develop (2 ahead, 1 behind)
277
- │ ↕ PULL & PUSH NEEDED
278
- │ │
279
- │ ├─ dev/001-kits (current, 3 ahead)
280
- │ │ ↑ PUSH NEEDED
281
- │ │
282
- │ └─ dev/002-examples (merged)
283
- │ 🗑 CAN DELETE
284
-
285
- └─ hotfix/security (1 ahead)
286
- ⚠ URGENT PUSH
287
- ```
288
-
289
- ### Commit Graph
290
- ```
291
- Commits ahead of main:
292
-
293
- * e5f6g7h (HEAD) fix: Resolve merge conflict
294
-
295
- * d4e5f6g docs: Update README
296
-
297
- * c3d4e5f test: Add auth tests
298
-
299
- * b2c3d4e feat: Add User model
300
-
301
- * a1b2c3d feat: Add auth system
302
-
303
- o ─────── (origin/main)
304
- ```
305
-
306
- ---
307
-
308
- ## Use Cases
309
-
310
- ### Daily Development
311
- **Use**: `/review` before committing, `/commit` for every commit
312
-
313
- ### Before Creating PR
314
- **Use**: `/review` final check, `/pr` to create pull request
315
-
316
- ### Weekly Maintenance
317
- **Use**: `/cleanup` to remove merged branches and free up space
318
-
319
- ### Multi-Agent Projects
320
- **Combine with**: multiagent-kit for coordination and `/sync` command
321
- **Use**: `/review` for agent-to-agent code review
322
-
323
- ---
324
-
325
- ## Dependencies
326
-
327
- **None** - git-kit is standalone.
328
-
329
- **Requires**: Git 2.0+, optionally `gh` CLI for `/pr` command
330
-
331
- **Recommended with**: multiagent-kit (for worktree visualization)
332
-
333
- ---
334
-
335
- ## Compatibility
336
-
337
- - ✅ **Agents**: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot
338
- - ✅ **Platforms**: Linux, macOS, Windows
339
- - ✅ **Shells**: Bash, PowerShell (ASCII works in both!)
340
- - ✅ **Vanilla safe**: Only adds new files, never modifies existing
341
-
342
- ---
343
-
344
- ## Uninstall
345
-
346
- ```bash
347
- lite-kits remove -Kit git
348
- ```
349
-
350
- Removes:
351
- - `.claude/commands/{commit,pr,review,cleanup}.md`
352
- - `.github/prompts/{commit,pr,review,cleanup}.prompt.md`
353
-
354
- ---
355
-
356
- ## Future Enhancements
357
-
358
- Considering for git-kit:
359
- - `/rebase` - Interactive rebase helper
360
- - `/stash` - Stash management with visualization
361
- - `/blame` - Enhanced git blame with agent attribution
362
- - `/conflicts` - Merge conflict resolver helper
363
- - `/bisect` - Git bisect helper for finding bugs
364
-
365
- Suggest more in [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/tmorgan181/spec-kit-multiagent-lite/discussions).