judgeval 0.0.51__py3-none-any.whl → 0.0.53__py3-none-any.whl

judgeval/judges/mixture_of_judges.py

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ from judgeval.common.utils import (
     aget_completion_multiple_models,
     aget_chat_completion,
 )
-from judgeval.common.logger import debug, error
+from judgeval.common.logger import judgeval_logger
 
 
 def build_dynamic_mixture_prompt(
@@ -85,14 +85,13 @@ def build_dynamic_mixture_prompt(
     # If a custom system prompt is provided, validate and use it
     if custom_system_prompt is not None:
         if not isinstance(custom_system_prompt, str):
-            error(
+            judgeval_logger.error(
                 f"TypeError: Custom system prompt must be a string. Received: {type(custom_system_prompt)}."
             )
             raise TypeError(
                 f"Custom system prompt must be a string. Received: {type(custom_system_prompt)}."
             )
         if not custom_system_prompt:
-            error("ValueError: Custom system prompt cannot be empty")
             raise ValueError("Custom system prompt cannot be empty")
         # Override the default system prompt, but also add special instructions for handling JSON
         default_conversation[0]["content"] = (
@@ -105,31 +104,21 @@ def build_dynamic_mixture_prompt(
         # Validate custom conversation history format
         for message in custom_conversation_history:
             if not isinstance(message, dict):
-                error(
-                    f"TypeError: Custom conversation history must be a list of dictionaries. Received: {message}."
-                )
                 raise TypeError(
                     f"Custom conversation history must be a list of dictionaries. Received: {message}."
                 )
 
             if "role" not in message or "content" not in message:
-                error("ValueError: Each message must have 'role' and 'content' keys")
                 raise ValueError("Each message must have 'role' and 'content' keys")
 
             if not isinstance(message["role"], str) or not isinstance(
                 message["content"], str
             ):
-                error(
-                    f"TypeError: Message role and content must be strings. Received: {type(message['role'])}, {type(message['content'])}."
-                )
                 raise TypeError(
                     f"Message role and content must be strings. Received: {type(message['role'])}, {type(message['content'])}."
                 )
 
             if message["role"] not in ["system", "user", "assistant"]:
-                error(
-                    f"ValueError: Message role must be one of: 'system', 'user', 'assistant'. Received: {message['role']}."
-                )
                 raise ValueError(
                     f"Message role must be one of: 'system', 'user', 'assistant'. Received: {message['role']}."
                 )
@@ -200,7 +189,6 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
             aggregation_schema (pydantic.BaseModel): Response schema for the aggregator model.
             kwargs: Additional keyword arguments.
         """
-        debug(f"Generating response for input type: {type(input)}")
 
         # Convert input to conversation format if needed
         if isinstance(input, str):
@@ -208,7 +196,7 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
         elif isinstance(input, list):
             convo = input
         else:
-            error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
+            judgeval_logger.error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
             raise TypeError(
                 f"Input must be a string or a list of dictionaries. Input type of: {type(input)}"
             )
@@ -219,8 +207,7 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
                 messages=[convo] * len(self.models),
                 response_formats=[response_schema] * len(self.models),
             )
-        except Exception as e:
-            error(f"Error getting completions from multiple models: {str(e)}")
+        except Exception:
             raise
 
         compiled_mixture_prompt = build_dynamic_mixture_prompt(
@@ -235,8 +222,7 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
                 messages=compiled_mixture_prompt,
                 response_format=aggregation_schema,
             )
-        except Exception as e:
-            error(f"Error getting chat completion from aggregator: {str(e)}")
+        except Exception:
             raise
 
         return mixed_response
@@ -255,7 +241,6 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
             aggregation_schema (pydantic.BaseModel): Response schema for the aggregator model.
             kwargs: Additional keyword arguments.
         """
-        debug(f"Generating response for input type: {type(input)}")
 
         # Convert input to conversation format if needed
         if isinstance(input, str):
@@ -263,7 +248,7 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
         elif isinstance(input, list):
             convo = input
         else:
-            error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
+            judgeval_logger.error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
             raise TypeError(
                 f"Input must be a string or a list of dictionaries. Input type of: {type(input)}"
             )
@@ -274,8 +259,7 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
                 messages=[convo] * len(self.models),
                 response_formats=[response_schema] * len(self.models),
             )
-        except Exception as e:
-            error(f"Error getting async completions from multiple models: {str(e)}")
+        except Exception:
             raise
 
         compiled_mixture_prompt = build_dynamic_mixture_prompt(
@@ -290,8 +274,7 @@ class MixtureOfJudges(JudgevalJudge):
                 messages=compiled_mixture_prompt,
                 response_format=aggregation_schema,
             )
-        except Exception as e:
-            error(f"Error getting async chat completion from aggregator: {str(e)}")
+        except Exception:
             raise
 
         return mixed_response

judgeval/judges/together_judge.py

@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ Implementation of using TogetherAI inference for judges.
 
 from pydantic import BaseModel
 from typing import List, Union
-from judgeval.common.logger import debug, error
 
 from judgeval.judges import JudgevalJudge
 from judgeval.common.utils import (
     fetch_together_api_response,
     afetch_together_api_response,
 )
+from judgeval.common.logger import judgeval_logger
 
 BASE_CONVERSATION = [
     {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
@@ -19,14 +19,12 @@ BASE_CONVERSATION = [
 
 class TogetherJudge(JudgevalJudge):
     def __init__(self, model: str = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Turbo", **kwargs):
-        debug(f"Initializing TogetherJudge with model={model}")
         self.model = model
         self.kwargs = kwargs
         super().__init__(model_name=model)
 
     # TODO: Fix cost for generate and a_generate
     def generate(self, input: Union[str, List[dict]], schema: BaseModel = None) -> str:
-        debug(f"Generating response for input type: {type(input)}")
         if isinstance(input, str):
             convo = BASE_CONVERSATION + [{"role": "user", "content": input}]
             return fetch_together_api_response(
@@ -38,13 +36,12 @@ class TogetherJudge(JudgevalJudge):
                 self.model, convo, response_format=schema
             )
         else:
-            error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
+            judgeval_logger.error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
             raise TypeError("Input must be a string or a list of dictionaries.")
 
     async def a_generate(
         self, input: Union[str, List[dict]], schema: BaseModel = None
     ) -> str:
-        debug(f"Async generating response for input type: {type(input)}")
         if isinstance(input, str):
             convo = BASE_CONVERSATION + [{"role": "user", "content": input}]
             res = await afetch_together_api_response(
@@ -58,7 +55,7 @@ class TogetherJudge(JudgevalJudge):
             )
             return res
         else:
-            error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
+            judgeval_logger.error(f"Invalid input type received: {type(input)}")
             raise TypeError("Input must be a string or a list of dictionaries.")
 
     def load_model(self) -> str:

judgeval/judgment_client.py

@@ -14,12 +14,11 @@ from judgeval.data.datasets import EvalDataset, EvalDatasetClient
 from judgeval.data import (
     ScoringResult,
     Example,
-    CustomExample,
     Trace,
 )
 from judgeval.scorers import (
-    APIJudgmentScorer,
-    JudgevalScorer,
+    APIScorerConfig,
+    BaseScorer,
     ClassifierScorer,
 )
 from judgeval.evaluation_run import EvaluationRun
@@ -41,6 +40,7 @@ from judgeval.common.tracer import Tracer
 from judgeval.common.utils import validate_api_key
 from pydantic import BaseModel
 from judgeval.run_evaluation import SpinnerWrappedTask
+from judgeval.common.logger import judgeval_logger
 
 
 class EvalRunRequestBody(BaseModel):
@@ -68,37 +68,35 @@ class SingletonMeta(type):
 class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
     def __init__(
         self,
-        judgment_api_key: Optional[str] = os.getenv("JUDGMENT_API_KEY"),
+        api_key: Optional[str] = os.getenv("JUDGMENT_API_KEY"),
         organization_id: Optional[str] = os.getenv("JUDGMENT_ORG_ID"),
     ):
-        # Check if API key is None
-        if judgment_api_key is None:
+        if not api_key:
             raise ValueError(
-                "JUDGMENT_API_KEY cannot be None. Please provide a valid API key or set the JUDGMENT_API_KEY environment variable."
+                "api_key parameter must be provided. Please provide a valid API key value or set the JUDGMENT_API_KEY environment variable."
             )
 
-        # Check if organization ID is None
-        if organization_id is None:
+        if not organization_id:
             raise ValueError(
-                "JUDGMENT_ORG_ID cannot be None. Please provide a valid organization ID or set the JUDGMENT_ORG_ID environment variable."
+                "organization_id parameter must be provided. Please provide a valid organization ID value or set the JUDGMENT_ORG_ID environment variable."
             )
 
-        self.judgment_api_key = judgment_api_key
+        self.judgment_api_key = api_key
         self.organization_id = organization_id
-        self.eval_dataset_client = EvalDatasetClient(judgment_api_key, organization_id)
+        self.eval_dataset_client = EvalDatasetClient(api_key, organization_id)
 
         # Verify API key is valid
-        result, response = validate_api_key(judgment_api_key)
+        result, response = validate_api_key(api_key)
         if not result:
             # May be bad to output their invalid API key...
             raise JudgmentAPIError(f"Issue with passed in Judgment API key: {response}")
         else:
-            print("Successfully initialized JudgmentClient!")
+            judgeval_logger.info("Successfully initialized JudgmentClient!")
 
     def a_run_evaluation(
         self,
         examples: List[Example],
-        scorers: List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]],
+        scorers: List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]],
         model: Optional[str] = "gpt-4.1",
         project_name: str = "default_project",
         eval_run_name: str = "default_eval_run",
@@ -120,7 +118,7 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
 
     def run_trace_evaluation(
         self,
-        scorers: List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]],
+        scorers: List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]],
         examples: Optional[List[Example]] = None,
         function: Optional[Callable] = None,
         tracer: Optional[Union[Tracer, BaseCallbackHandler]] = None,
@@ -163,8 +161,8 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
 
     def run_evaluation(
         self,
-        examples: Union[List[Example], List[CustomExample]],
-        scorers: List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]],
+        examples: List[Example],
+        scorers: List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]],
         model: Optional[str] = "gpt-4.1",
         project_name: str = "default_project",
         eval_run_name: str = "default_eval_run",
@@ -176,8 +174,8 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
         Executes an evaluation of `Example`s using one or more `Scorer`s
 
         Args:
-            examples (Union[List[Example], List[CustomExample]]): The examples to evaluate
-            scorers (List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]]): A list of scorers to use for evaluation
+            examples (List[Example]): The examples to evaluate
+            scorers (List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]]): A list of scorers to use for evaluation
             model (str): The model used as a judge when using LLM as a Judge
             project_name (str): The name of the project the evaluation results belong to
             eval_run_name (str): A name for this evaluation run
@@ -450,7 +448,7 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
     def assert_test(
         self,
         examples: List[Example],
-        scorers: List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]],
+        scorers: List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]],
         model: Optional[str] = "gpt-4.1",
         project_name: str = "default_test",
         eval_run_name: str = str(uuid4()),
@@ -463,7 +461,7 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
 
         Args:
             examples (List[Example]): The examples to evaluate.
-            scorers (List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]]): A list of scorers to use for evaluation
+            scorers (List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]]): A list of scorers to use for evaluation
             model (str): The model used as a judge when using LLM as a Judge
             project_name (str): The name of the project the evaluation results belong to
             eval_run_name (str): A name for this evaluation run
@@ -498,7 +496,7 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
 
     def assert_trace_test(
         self,
-        scorers: List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]],
+        scorers: List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]],
         examples: Optional[List[Example]] = None,
         function: Optional[Callable] = None,
         tracer: Optional[Union[Tracer, BaseCallbackHandler]] = None,
@@ -516,7 +514,7 @@ class JudgmentClient(metaclass=SingletonMeta):
 
         Args:
             examples (List[Example]): The examples to evaluate.
-            scorers (List[Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]]): A list of scorers to use for evaluation
+            scorers (List[Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]]): A list of scorers to use for evaluation
             model (str): The model used as a judge when using LLM as a Judge
             project_name (str): The name of the project the evaluation results belong to
             eval_run_name (str): A name for this evaluation run

judgeval/rules.py

@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ Rules system for Judgeval that enables alerts based on metric thresholds.
 """
 
 from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Union, Any, Tuple
-from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, field_validator, ConfigDict
+from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, ConfigDict
 import asyncio
 from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
 import uuid
 
-from judgeval.scorers import APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer
+from judgeval.scorers import APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer
 from judgeval.utils.alerts import AlertStatus, AlertResult
 
 
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ class Condition(BaseModel):
 
     Example:
         {
-            "metric": FaithfulnessScorer(threshold=0.7)  # Must be a scorer object: APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer
+            "metric": FaithfulnessScorer(threshold=0.7)  # Must be a scorer object: APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer
         }
 
     The Condition class uses the scorer's threshold and success function internally.
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ class Condition(BaseModel):
 
     model_config = ConfigDict(arbitrary_types_allowed=True)
 
-    metric: Union[APIJudgmentScorer, JudgevalScorer]
+    metric: Union[APIScorerConfig, BaseScorer]
 
     @property
     def metric_name(self) -> str:
         """Get the name of the metric for lookups in scores dictionary."""
         if hasattr(self.metric, "score_type"):
-            # Handle APIJudgmentScorer and JudgevalScorer which have score_type
+            # Handle APIScorerConfig and BaseScorer which have score_type
             return self.metric.score_type
         elif hasattr(self.metric, "__name__"):
             # Handle cases where metric has a __name__ attribute
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ class Condition(BaseModel):
         # Use the scorer's success check function if available
         if hasattr(self.metric, "success_check"):
             return self.metric.success_check()
-        elif hasattr(self.metric, "_success_check"):
-            return self.metric._success_check()
+        elif hasattr(self.metric, "success_check"):
+            return self.metric.success_check()
         else:
             # Fallback to default comparison (greater than or equal)
             return value >= self.threshold if self.threshold is not None else False
@@ -241,18 +241,6 @@ class Rule(BaseModel):
 
         return data
 
-    @field_validator("conditions")
-    def validate_conditions_not_empty(cls, v):
-        if not v:
-            raise ValueError("Conditions list cannot be empty")
-        return v
-
-    @field_validator("combine_type")
-    def validate_combine_type(cls, v):
-        if v not in ["all", "any"]:
-            raise ValueError(f"combine_type must be 'all' or 'any', got: {v}")
-        return v
-
 
 class RulesEngine:
     """