empathy-framework 4.6.6__py3-none-any.whl → 4.7.1__py3-none-any.whl

empathy_software_plugin/wizards/rag_pattern_wizard.py

@@ -1,461 +0,0 @@
-"""RAG Pattern Wizard - Level 4 Anticipatory Empathy
-
-Alerts developers when RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) implementation
-will encounter scalability or quality issues.
-
-In our experience, RAG seems simple at first (vector DB + similarity search).
-But we learned: embedding quality, chunk strategy, and retrieval relevance
-degrade as data grows. This wizard alerts before those issues surface.
-
-Copyright 2025 Smart AI Memory, LLC
-Licensed under Fair Source 0.9
-"""
-
-import os
-import sys
-from typing import Any
-
-sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "..", "..", "src"))
-
-from empathy_os.plugins import BaseWizard
-
-
-class RAGPatternWizard(BaseWizard):
-    """Level 4 Anticipatory: Predicts RAG implementation issues.
-
-    What We Learned About RAG:
-    - Naive chunking (split by char count) fails when data grows
-    - Embedding quality matters more than vector DB choice
-    - Retrieval relevance degrades as corpus grows without tuning
-    - Hybrid search (vector + keyword) becomes essential at scale
-    """
-
-    def __init__(self):
-        super().__init__(
-            name="RAG Pattern Wizard",
-            domain="software",
-            empathy_level=4,
-            category="ai_development",
-        )
-
-    def get_required_context(self) -> list[str]:
-        """Required context for analysis"""
-        return [
-            "rag_implementation",  # RAG implementation files
-            "embedding_strategy",  # How embeddings are created
-            "chunk_strategy",  # How documents are chunked
-            "vector_db_config",  # Vector DB configuration
-            "corpus_size",  # Current corpus size
-        ]
-
-    async def analyze(self, context: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
-        """Analyze RAG implementation and predict quality/scale issues.
-
-        In our experience: RAG breaks down in predictable ways as it scales.
-        Early detection prevents painful rewrites.
-        """
-        self.validate_context(context)
-
-        rag_impl = context.get("rag_implementation", [])
-        embedding_strat = context.get("embedding_strategy", {})
-        chunk_strat = context.get("chunk_strategy", {})
-        corpus_size = context.get("corpus_size", 0)
-
-        # Current issues
-        issues = await self._analyze_rag_implementation(
-            rag_impl,
-            embedding_strat,
-            chunk_strat,
-            corpus_size,
-        )
-
-        # Level 4: Predict future RAG issues
-        predictions = await self._predict_rag_degradation(
-            rag_impl,
-            embedding_strat,
-            chunk_strat,
-            corpus_size,
-            context,
-        )
-
-        recommendations = self._generate_recommendations(issues, predictions)
-        patterns = self._extract_patterns(issues, predictions)
-
-        return {
-            "issues": issues,
-            "predictions": predictions,
-            "recommendations": recommendations,
-            "patterns": patterns,
-            "confidence": 0.80,
-            "metadata": {
-                "wizard": self.name,
-                "empathy_level": self.empathy_level,
-                "corpus_size": corpus_size,
-                "chunking_strategy": chunk_strat.get("type", "unknown"),
-            },
-        }
-
-    async def _analyze_rag_implementation(
-        self,
-        rag_impl: list[str],
-        embedding_strat: dict,
-        chunk_strat: dict,
-        corpus_size: int,
-    ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
-        """Analyze current RAG implementation"""
-        issues = []
-
-        # Issue: Naive character-based chunking
-        if chunk_strat.get("type") == "character" or chunk_strat.get("type") == "fixed":
-            issues.append(
-                {
-                    "severity": "warning",
-                    "type": "naive_chunking",
-                    "message": (
-                        "Using character-based chunking. In our experience, this breaks "
-                        "semantic coherence and reduces retrieval quality."
-                    ),
-                    "suggestion": (
-                        "Use semantic chunking: split by paragraphs, sentences, or "
-                        "semantic boundaries (e.g., LangChain SemanticChunker)"
-                    ),
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Issue: No chunk overlap
-        if not chunk_strat.get("overlap", False):
-            issues.append(
-                {
-                    "severity": "info",
-                    "type": "no_chunk_overlap",
-                    "message": (
-                        "No chunk overlap detected. Without overlap, relevant context "
-                        "split across chunk boundaries is lost."
-                    ),
-                    "suggestion": "Add 10-20% overlap between chunks",
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Issue: No metadata enrichment
-        if not embedding_strat.get("metadata_enrichment", False):
-            issues.append(
-                {
-                    "severity": "info",
-                    "type": "missing_metadata",
-                    "message": (
-                        "Chunks not enriched with metadata (source, date, category). "
-                        "In our experience, metadata filtering dramatically improves retrieval."
-                    ),
-                    "suggestion": "Add metadata to chunks for filtering and relevance",
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Issue: Single embedding model
-        if not embedding_strat.get("multi_model", False) and corpus_size > 1000:
-            issues.append(
-                {
-                    "severity": "info",
-                    "type": "single_embedding_model",
-                    "message": (
-                        "Using single embedding model for diverse content. "
-                        "Different content types (code, docs, data) benefit from "
-                        "specialized embeddings."
-                    ),
-                    "suggestion": "Consider domain-specific embeddings for different content types",
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Issue: No reranking
-        if not self._has_reranking(rag_impl):
-            issues.append(
-                {
-                    "severity": "warning",
-                    "type": "no_reranking",
-                    "message": (
-                        "No reranking layer detected. In our experience, initial vector "
-                        "similarity often returns suboptimal results. Reranking improves quality 30-50%."
-                    ),
-                    "suggestion": "Add reranker (e.g., Cohere rerank, cross-encoder model)",
-                },
-            )
-
-        return issues
-
-    async def _predict_rag_degradation(
-        self,
-        rag_impl: list[str],
-        embedding_strat: dict,
-        chunk_strat: dict,
-        corpus_size: int,
-        full_context: dict[str, Any],
-    ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
-        """Level 4: Predict when RAG quality will degrade.
-
-        Based on our experience: RAG breaks at predictable thresholds.
-        """
-        predictions = []
-
-        # Pattern 1: Corpus growth will degrade retrieval
-        if corpus_size > 5000 and not self._has_hybrid_search(rag_impl):
-            predictions.append(
-                {
-                    "type": "retrieval_degradation",
-                    "alert": (
-                        f"Corpus size: {corpus_size:,} documents. In our experience, "
-                        "pure vector search degrades above 10,000 documents without hybrid search. "
-                        "Alert: Implement hybrid search (vector + keyword) before quality drops."
-                    ),
-                    "probability": "high",
-                    "impact": "high",
-                    "prevention_steps": [
-                        "Implement hybrid search (combine vector similarity + BM25 keyword)",
-                        "Add query expansion (synonyms, related terms)",
-                        "Implement result fusion (merge vector and keyword results)",
-                        "Add relevance feedback loop (learn from user selections)",
-                    ],
-                    "reasoning": (
-                        "Vector search alone: high recall, low precision at scale. "
-                        "Keyword search: high precision, low recall. "
-                        "Hybrid: best of both. We've seen 40-60% quality improvement."
-                    ),
-                    "personal_experience": (
-                        "At 8,000 documents, our vector-only retrieval started returning "
-                        "too many 'similar but not relevant' results. Added BM25 hybrid search, "
-                        "quality jumped immediately."
-                    ),
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Pattern 2: Embedding staleness
-        if corpus_size > 1000 and not embedding_strat.get("refresh_strategy"):
-            predictions.append(
-                {
-                    "type": "embedding_staleness",
-                    "alert": (
-                        "No embedding refresh strategy detected. As documents change, "
-                        "embeddings become stale. In our experience, this causes gradual "
-                        "quality degradation that's hard to notice."
-                    ),
-                    "probability": "medium-high",
-                    "impact": "medium",
-                    "prevention_steps": [
-                        "Implement incremental embedding updates (only changed docs)",
-                        "Add embedding versioning (track which model version)",
-                        "Create embedding freshness metrics",
-                        "Schedule periodic re-embedding for entire corpus",
-                    ],
-                    "reasoning": (
-                        "Documents change, but embeddings don't auto-update. "
-                        "Stale embeddings = stale retrieval. Incremental updates solve this."
-                    ),
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Pattern 3: No query understanding layer
-        if not self._has_query_understanding(rag_impl):
-            predictions.append(
-                {
-                    "type": "poor_query_handling",
-                    "alert": (
-                        "No query understanding layer. Users ask questions in many ways. "
-                        "In our experience, naive query → embedding → search fails on "
-                        "complex queries. Alert: Add query processing before retrieval quality plateaus."
-                    ),
-                    "probability": "medium",
-                    "impact": "high",
-                    "prevention_steps": [
-                        "Add query decomposition (break complex queries into sub-queries)",
-                        "Implement query rewriting (rephrase for better retrieval)",
-                        "Add intent classification (route to different retrieval strategies)",
-                        "Create query expansion (add relevant terms)",
-                    ],
-                    "reasoning": (
-                        "User query: 'How do I prevent SQL injection in React apps?'. "
-                        "Needs decomposition: 1) SQL injection prevention, 2) React context. "
-                        "Naive embedding misses nuance."
-                    ),
-                    "personal_experience": (
-                        "We added simple query rewriting (expand acronyms, add synonyms). "
-                        "Retrieval quality improved 25% with minimal effort."
-                    ),
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Pattern 4: Missing evaluation framework
-        if not self._has_evaluation(rag_impl):
-            predictions.append(
-                {
-                    "type": "no_rag_evaluation",
-                    "alert": (
-                        "No RAG evaluation framework detected. In our experience, "
-                        "you can't improve what you don't measure. Alert: Build evaluation "
-                        "before you waste time on optimizations that don't help."
-                    ),
-                    "probability": "high",
-                    "impact": "high",
-                    "prevention_steps": [
-                        "Create ground truth Q&A pairs (what SHOULD be retrieved)",
-                        "Implement retrieval metrics (MRR, NDCG, precision@k)",
-                        "Add end-to-end evaluation (does RAG answer correctly?)",
-                        "Build A/B testing framework (compare strategies)",
-                        "Create evaluation dashboard (track quality over time)",
-                    ],
-                    "reasoning": (
-                        "Is chunking A better than chunking B? Is reranking worth it? "
-                        "Without eval, you're guessing. We spent weeks optimizing the wrong things."
-                    ),
-                    "personal_experience": (
-                        "We thought our RAG was great. Built evaluation, discovered 40% "
-                        "of queries retrieved irrelevant docs. Fixed in 2 days with data."
-                    ),
-                },
-            )
-
-        # Pattern 5: Context window waste
-        if not self._has_context_optimization(rag_impl):
-            predictions.append(
-                {
-                    "type": "inefficient_context_usage",
-                    "alert": (
-                        "No context optimization detected. In our experience, dumping "
-                        "all retrieved chunks into context wastes tokens and reduces quality. "
-                        "Alert: Optimize context usage before costs and quality both degrade."
-                    ),
-                    "probability": "medium",
-                    "impact": "medium",
-                    "prevention_steps": [
-                        "Implement relevance-based pruning (only use top-k)",
-                        "Add chunk summarization (compress verbose chunks)",
-                        "Create context deduplication (remove redundant info)",
-                        "Implement adaptive retrieval (fewer chunks for simple queries)",
-                        "Add context budget management",
-                    ],
-                    "reasoning": (
-                        "Retrieving 10 chunks doesn't mean use all 10. "
-                        "Top 3 might be enough. Extra context confuses AI and costs money."
-                    ),
-                },
-            )
-
-        return predictions
-
-    def _generate_recommendations(self, issues: list[dict], predictions: list[dict]) -> list[str]:
-        """Generate actionable recommendations"""
-        recommendations = []
-
-        # Quick wins
-        if any(i["type"] == "no_reranking" for i in issues):
-            recommendations.append(
-                "[QUICK WIN] Add reranking layer. In our experience, "
-                "this is highest ROI improvement (30-50% quality boost, minimal effort).",
-            )
-
-        # High-impact predictions
-        for pred in predictions:
-            if pred.get("impact") == "high":
-                recommendations.append(f"\n[ALERT] {pred['alert']}")
-                if "personal_experience" in pred:
-                    recommendations.append(f"Experience: {pred['personal_experience']}")
-                recommendations.append("Prevention steps:")
-                for i, step in enumerate(pred["prevention_steps"][:3], 1):
-                    recommendations.append(f"  {i}. {step}")
-
-        return recommendations
-
-    def _extract_patterns(
-        self,
-        issues: list[dict],
-        predictions: list[dict],
-    ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
-        """Extract cross-domain patterns"""
-        return [
-            {
-                "pattern_type": "retrieval_quality_degradation",
-                "description": (
-                    "Single-strategy retrieval systems degrade as corpus grows. "
-                    "Hybrid approaches become essential at scale."
-                ),
-                "domain_agnostic": True,
-                "applicable_to": [
-                    "RAG systems",
-                    "Search engines",
-                    "Recommendation systems",
-                    "Information retrieval (healthcare, legal, etc.)",
-                ],
-                "threshold": "5,000-10,000 items",
-                "solution": "Hybrid retrieval (multiple signals combined)",
-            },
-        ]
-
-    # Helper methods
-
-    def _has_reranking(self, rag_impl: list[str]) -> bool:
-        """Check for reranking layer"""
-        for file_path in rag_impl:
-            try:
-                with open(file_path) as f:
-                    content = f.read()
-                    if any(
-                        kw in content.lower() for kw in ["rerank", "cross-encoder", "cohere.rerank"]
-                    ):
-                        return True
-            except OSError:
-                pass
-        return False
-
-    def _has_hybrid_search(self, rag_impl: list[str]) -> bool:
-        """Check for hybrid search implementation"""
-        for file_path in rag_impl:
-            try:
-                with open(file_path) as f:
-                    content = f.read()
-                    if any(kw in content.lower() for kw in ["hybrid", "bm25", "keyword", "fusion"]):
-                        return True
-            except OSError:
-                pass
-        return False
-
-    def _has_query_understanding(self, rag_impl: list[str]) -> bool:
-        """Check for query understanding/processing"""
-        for file_path in rag_impl:
-            try:
-                with open(file_path) as f:
-                    content = f.read()
-                    if any(
-                        kw in content.lower()
-                        for kw in ["query_rewrite", "query_expansion", "decompose", "intent"]
-                    ):
-                        return True
-            except OSError:
-                pass
-        return False
-
-    def _has_evaluation(self, rag_impl: list[str]) -> bool:
-        """Check for RAG evaluation framework"""
-        for file_path in rag_impl:
-            try:
-                with open(file_path) as f:
-                    content = f.read()
-                    if any(
-                        kw in content.lower()
-                        for kw in ["evaluate", "metrics", "ground_truth", "precision", "recall"]
-                    ):
-                        return True
-            except OSError:
-                pass
-        return False
-
-    def _has_context_optimization(self, rag_impl: list[str]) -> bool:
-        """Check for context optimization strategies"""
-        for file_path in rag_impl:
-            try:
-                with open(file_path) as f:
-                    content = f.read()
-                    if any(
-                        kw in content.lower()
-                        for kw in ["prune", "summarize", "deduplicate", "context_budget"]
-                    ):
-                        return True
-            except OSError:
-                pass
-        return False

empathy_software_plugin/wizards/security/__init__.py

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-"""Security Analysis Components
-
-Supporting modules for Security Analysis Wizard.
-
-Copyright 2025 Smart-AI-Memory
-Licensed under Fair Source License 0.9
-"""
-
-from .exploit_analyzer import ExploitAnalyzer
-from .owasp_patterns import OWASPPatternDetector
-from .vulnerability_scanner import (
-    DependencyVulnerability,
-    Severity,
-    Vulnerability,
-    VulnerabilityScanner,
-    VulnerabilityScanReport,
-    VulnerabilityType,
-)
-
-__all__ = [
-    "DependencyVulnerability",
-    # Exploit Analysis
-    "ExploitAnalyzer",
-    # OWASP Patterns
-    "OWASPPatternDetector",
-    "Severity",
-    "Vulnerability",
-    "VulnerabilityScanReport",
-    # Vulnerability Scanning
-    "VulnerabilityScanner",
-    "VulnerabilityType",
-]