decodingtrust-agent-sdk 0.1.0__py3-none-any.whl

dt_arena/mcp_server/legal/scripts/collect_data.py

@@ -0,0 +1,988 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""
+Legal Data Collection Script
+
+Collect real legal data from public sources:
+1. CORGIS Supreme Court Dataset
+2. Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
+3. Free Law Project data
+"""
+
+import json
+import os
+import sys
+import random
+import requests
+from datetime import datetime
+from typing import List, Dict, Any
+
+# Output directory
+SCRIPT_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
+DATA_DIR = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(SCRIPT_DIR), "data")
+
+
+def download_supreme_court_corgis():
+    """Download Supreme Court data from CORGIS dataset."""
+    url = "https://corgis-edu.github.io/corgis/datasets/json/supreme_court/supreme_court.json"
+    print(f"Downloading Supreme Court data from CORGIS...")
+
+    try:
+        response = requests.get(url, timeout=60)
+        response.raise_for_status()
+        data = response.json()
+        print(f"Downloaded {len(data)} cases")
+        return data
+    except Exception as e:
+        print(f"Error downloading CORGIS data: {e}")
+        return []
+
+
+def convert_corgis_to_cases(corgis_data: List[Dict], limit: int = 100) -> List[Dict]:
+    """Convert CORGIS Supreme Court data to our case format."""
+    cases = []
+
+    # Sample diverse cases
+    sampled = random.sample(corgis_data, min(limit, len(corgis_data)))
+
+    for i, item in enumerate(sampled):
+        try:
+            # Extract citation
+            citation = item.get("citation", {})
+            us_cite = citation.get("us", "")
+            sct_cite = citation.get("sct", "")
+
+            # Extract decision info
+            decision = item.get("decision", {})
+            date_info = decision.get("date", {})
+
+            # Format date
+            if date_info:
+                date_str = f"{date_info.get('year', 1900)}-{date_info.get('month', 1):02d}-{date_info.get('day', 1):02d}"
+            else:
+                date_str = "1900-01-01"
+
+            # Extract issue info
+            issue = item.get("issue", {})
+            issue_area = issue.get("area", "Unknown")
+            issue_text = issue.get("text", "")
+
+            # Build case record
+            case = {
+                "id": f"scotus_{i+1:04d}",
+                "citation": f"{item.get('name', 'Unknown')}, {us_cite}" if us_cite else item.get('name', 'Unknown Case'),
+                "title": item.get("name", "Unknown Case"),
+                "court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
+                "date": date_str,
+                "jurisdiction": "federal",
+                "summary": f"Supreme Court case concerning {issue_text}. Decision direction: {decision.get('direction', 'unknown')}.",
+                "holding": f"The Court {decision.get('case', {}).get('disposition', 'decided')} the lower court's decision. Winning party: {decision.get('winning party', 'unknown')}.",
+                "status": "good_law",
+                "topics": [issue_area.lower(), issue_text.split(":")[0].strip() if ":" in issue_text else issue_text],
+                "is_valid": True,
+                "voting": {
+                    "majority": item.get("voting", {}).get("majority", 0),
+                    "minority": item.get("voting", {}).get("minority", 0)
+                },
+                "term": decision.get("term", 0),
+                "docket": item.get("docket", 0)
+            }
+            cases.append(case)
+        except Exception as e:
+            print(f"Error processing case: {e}")
+            continue
+
+    return cases
+
+
+def create_synthetic_lower_court_cases(count: int = 50) -> List[Dict]:
+    """Create synthetic but realistic lower court cases."""
+
+    case_types = [
+        {
+            "type": "contract",
+            "courts": ["U.S. District Court", "State Superior Court"],
+            "topics": ["breach of contract", "contract interpretation", "damages"],
+            "templates": [
+                "{plaintiff} v. {defendant} - Breach of {contract_type} contract dispute",
+                "{company1} v. {company2} - Contract dispute over {subject}",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "tort",
+            "courts": ["U.S. District Court", "State Superior Court", "Court of Appeals"],
+            "topics": ["negligence", "personal injury", "products liability", "medical malpractice"],
+            "templates": [
+                "{plaintiff} v. {defendant} - Personal injury claim arising from {incident}",
+                "{plaintiff} v. {company} - Products liability claim for {product} defect",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "employment",
+            "courts": ["U.S. District Court", "EEOC", "State Labor Board"],
+            "topics": ["discrimination", "wrongful termination", "wage and hour", "harassment"],
+            "templates": [
+                "{plaintiff} v. {employer} - Employment discrimination based on {basis}",
+                "EEOC v. {company} - Pattern of {violation} violations",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "intellectual_property",
+            "courts": ["U.S. District Court", "Federal Circuit", "Patent Trial Board"],
+            "topics": ["patent infringement", "trademark", "copyright", "trade secrets"],
+            "templates": [
+                "{company1} v. {company2} - Patent infringement regarding {technology}",
+                "{owner} v. {infringer} - Copyright infringement of {work}",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "criminal",
+            "courts": ["U.S. District Court", "State Superior Court", "Court of Appeals"],
+            "topics": ["fraud", "white collar crime", "drug offenses", "violent crimes"],
+            "templates": [
+                "United States v. {defendant} - {charge} charges",
+                "People v. {defendant} - Criminal prosecution for {crime}",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "corporate",
+            "courts": ["Delaware Chancery Court", "U.S. District Court", "State Business Court"],
+            "topics": ["merger", "fiduciary duty", "shareholder rights", "securities"],
+            "templates": [
+                "In re {company} Shareholders Litigation - {issue}",
+                "{shareholder} v. {company} Board - Breach of fiduciary duty",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "real_estate",
+            "courts": ["State Superior Court", "U.S. District Court", "Land Court"],
+            "topics": ["property dispute", "easement", "zoning", "eminent domain"],
+            "templates": [
+                "{party1} v. {party2} - Property boundary dispute",
+                "{owner} v. City of {city} - Zoning variance appeal",
+            ]
+        },
+        {
+            "type": "family",
+            "courts": ["Family Court", "State Superior Court", "Probate Court"],
+            "topics": ["divorce", "custody", "child support", "estate"],
+            "templates": [
+                "In re Marriage of {party1} and {party2}",
+                "In re Estate of {decedent}",
+            ]
+        }
+    ]
+
+    names = ["Smith", "Johnson", "Williams", "Brown", "Jones", "Garcia", "Miller", "Davis",
+             "Rodriguez", "Martinez", "Anderson", "Taylor", "Thomas", "Moore", "Jackson",
+             "Martin", "Lee", "Thompson", "White", "Harris", "Clark", "Lewis", "Robinson"]
+
+    companies = ["Acme Corp", "TechVentures Inc", "Global Industries", "Pacific Holdings",
+                 "Atlantic Services", "Mountain View LLC", "Sunrise Partners", "Horizon Group",
+                 "Sterling Industries", "Premier Solutions", "Apex Technologies", "Vanguard Systems"]
+
+    cities = ["San Francisco", "Los Angeles", "New York", "Chicago", "Houston", "Phoenix",
+              "Philadelphia", "San Antonio", "San Diego", "Dallas", "Austin", "Seattle"]
+
+    jurisdictions = ["california", "new york", "texas", "florida", "illinois", "federal"]
+
+    cases = []
+    for i in range(count):
+        case_type = random.choice(case_types)
+
+        # Generate parties
+        plaintiff = random.choice(names) if random.random() > 0.3 else random.choice(companies)
+        defendant = random.choice(names) if random.random() > 0.4 else random.choice(companies)
+
+        # Generate court and jurisdiction
+        court = random.choice(case_type["courts"])
+        jurisdiction = random.choice(jurisdictions)
+        if "Federal" in court or "U.S." in court:
+            jurisdiction = "federal"
+
+        # Generate date (2015-2024)
+        year = random.randint(2015, 2024)
+        month = random.randint(1, 12)
+        day = random.randint(1, 28)
+
+        # Generate case number
+        case_num = f"{year}-CV-{random.randint(1000, 9999)}"
+
+        # Generate topics
+        topics = random.sample(case_type["topics"], min(2, len(case_type["topics"])))
+
+        # Generate holding
+        dispositions = ["affirmed", "reversed", "remanded", "dismissed", "granted summary judgment",
+                       "denied motion", "settled", "judgment for plaintiff", "judgment for defendant"]
+
+        case = {
+            "id": f"case_{case_type['type']}_{i+1:03d}",
+            "citation": f"{plaintiff} v. {defendant}, {case_num} ({court} {year})",
+            "title": f"{plaintiff} v. {defendant}",
+            "court": court,
+            "date": f"{year}-{month:02d}-{day:02d}",
+            "jurisdiction": jurisdiction,
+            "summary": f"Case involving {', '.join(topics)} claims. {plaintiff} brought action against {defendant}.",
+            "holding": f"The court {random.choice(dispositions)}. Key issues addressed: {', '.join(topics)}.",
+            "status": "good_law" if random.random() > 0.1 else "distinguished",
+            "topics": [case_type["type"]] + topics,
+            "is_valid": True,
+            "case_type": case_type["type"]
+        }
+        cases.append(case)
+
+    return cases
+
+
+def create_additional_statutes() -> List[Dict]:
+    """Create additional real statutes with required code and section fields."""
+    statutes = [
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_001",
+            "citation": "15 U.S.C. § 1",
+            "title": "Sherman Antitrust Act - Trusts Illegal",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "15 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "1",
+            "text": "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.",
+            "topics": ["antitrust", "competition", "trade"],
+            "effective_date": "1890-07-02",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_002",
+            "citation": "17 U.S.C. § 106",
+            "title": "Copyright Act - Exclusive Rights",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "17 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "106",
+            "text": "Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending...",
+            "topics": ["copyright", "intellectual property", "exclusive rights"],
+            "effective_date": "1978-01-01",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_003",
+            "citation": "35 U.S.C. § 101",
+            "title": "Patent Act - Inventions Patentable",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "35 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "101",
+            "text": "Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.",
+            "topics": ["patent", "intellectual property", "invention"],
+            "effective_date": "1952-07-19",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_004",
+            "citation": "29 U.S.C. § 206",
+            "title": "Fair Labor Standards Act - Minimum Wage",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "29 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "206",
+            "text": "Every employer shall pay to each of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, wages at the following rates...",
+            "topics": ["labor law", "minimum wage", "employment"],
+            "effective_date": "1938-06-25",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_005",
+            "citation": "42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2",
+            "title": "Title VII - Unlawful Employment Practices",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "42 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "2000e-2",
+            "text": "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...",
+            "topics": ["civil rights", "employment discrimination", "equal opportunity"],
+            "effective_date": "1964-07-02",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_006",
+            "citation": "11 U.S.C. § 362",
+            "title": "Bankruptcy Code - Automatic Stay",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "11 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "362",
+            "text": "Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of (1) the commencement or continuation of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor...",
+            "topics": ["bankruptcy", "automatic stay", "creditor rights"],
+            "effective_date": "1978-11-06",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_007",
+            "citation": "26 U.S.C. § 61",
+            "title": "Internal Revenue Code - Gross Income Defined",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "26 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "61",
+            "text": "Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items; (2) Gross income derived from business; (3) Gains derived from dealings in property...",
+            "topics": ["tax law", "income tax", "gross income"],
+            "effective_date": "1954-08-16",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_008",
+            "citation": "18 U.S.C. § 1343",
+            "title": "Wire Fraud",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "18 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "1343",
+            "text": "Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.",
+            "topics": ["fraud", "wire fraud", "white collar crime"],
+            "effective_date": "1952-07-16",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_009",
+            "citation": "15 U.S.C. § 78j",
+            "title": "Securities Exchange Act - Manipulative Practices",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "15 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "78j",
+            "text": "It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange... To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security... any manipulative or deceptive device or contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe...",
+            "topics": ["securities", "fraud", "market manipulation"],
+            "effective_date": "1934-06-06",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_fed_010",
+            "citation": "28 U.S.C. § 1331",
+            "title": "Federal Question Jurisdiction",
+            "jurisdiction": "federal",
+            "code": "28 U.S.C.",
+            "section": "1331",
+            "text": "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.",
+            "topics": ["jurisdiction", "federal courts", "federal question"],
+            "effective_date": "1948-06-25",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        # State statutes
+        {
+            "id": "statute_ca_001",
+            "citation": "Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200",
+            "title": "California Unfair Competition Law",
+            "jurisdiction": "california",
+            "code": "Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code",
+            "section": "17200",
+            "text": "As used in this chapter, unfair competition shall mean and include any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice and unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising and any act prohibited by Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17500) of Part 3 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code.",
+            "topics": ["unfair competition", "consumer protection", "california"],
+            "effective_date": "1977-01-01",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_ca_002",
+            "citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 3294",
+            "title": "California Punitive Damages",
+            "jurisdiction": "california",
+            "code": "Cal. Civ. Code",
+            "section": "3294",
+            "text": "In an action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, the plaintiff, in addition to the actual damages, may recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant.",
+            "topics": ["damages", "punitive damages", "tort law", "california"],
+            "effective_date": "1872-01-01",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_ny_001",
+            "citation": "N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 630",
+            "title": "New York Business Corporation Law - Liability of Shareholders",
+            "jurisdiction": "new york",
+            "code": "N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law",
+            "section": "630",
+            "text": "The ten largest shareholders of a corporation, other than an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as from time to time amended... shall jointly and severally be personally liable for all debts, wages or salaries due and owing to any of its employees for services performed by them for such corporation.",
+            "topics": ["corporate law", "shareholder liability", "new york"],
+            "effective_date": "1963-09-01",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_del_001",
+            "citation": "8 Del. C. § 102(b)(7)",
+            "title": "Delaware General Corporation Law - Exculpation",
+            "jurisdiction": "delaware",
+            "code": "8 Del. C.",
+            "section": "102(b)(7)",
+            "text": "A provision eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that such provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director: (i) For any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders...",
+            "topics": ["corporate law", "fiduciary duty", "director liability", "delaware"],
+            "effective_date": "1986-07-01",
+            "status": "current"
+        },
+        {
+            "id": "statute_tx_001",
+            "citation": "Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 17.46",
+            "title": "Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act",
+            "code": "Tex. Bus. & Com. Code",
+            "section": "17.46",
+            "jurisdiction": "texas",
+            "text": "The term 'false, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices' includes, but is not limited to, the following acts: (1) passing off goods or services as those of another; (2) causing confusion or misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services...",
+            "topics": ["consumer protection", "deceptive practices", "texas"],
+            "effective_date": "1973-05-21",
+            "status": "current"
+        }
+    ]
+
+    return statutes
+
+
+def create_more_matters() -> List[Dict]:
+    """Create realistic client matters (all 10)."""
+    matters = [
+        # First 5 matters
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-001",
+            "title": "Johnson v. TechCorp - Employment Discrimination",
+            "matter_type": "litigation",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Employment discrimination lawsuit alleging wrongful termination based on age discrimination.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_001",
+                "name": "Sarah Johnson",
+                "email": "sjohnson@email.com",
+                "phone": "555-0101",
+                "address": "123 Main St, San Francisco, CA 94102",
+                "is_individual": True,
+                "confidential_notes": "Client is emotional about the case. Had 20 years with company before termination."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_001",
+                    "name": "TechCorp Industries",
+                    "role": "defendant",
+                    "counsel_name": "James Smith",
+                    "counsel_firm": "BigLaw LLP",
+                    "counsel_email": "jsmith@biglaw.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0200"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [
+                {
+                    "entry_id": "time_001",
+                    "date": "2024-01-15",
+                    "description": "Initial client consultation",
+                    "hours": 1.5,
+                    "rate": 350.0,
+                    "billed_by": "Attorney Williams"
+                },
+                {
+                    "entry_id": "time_002",
+                    "date": "2024-01-20",
+                    "description": "Review employment records and draft complaint",
+                    "hours": 4.0,
+                    "rate": 350.0,
+                    "billed_by": "Attorney Williams"
+                }
+            ],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Client mentioned potential witnesses: former colleagues Tom and Lisa.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-01-15T10:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-01-15",
+                "statute_of_limitations": "2025-06-01",
+                "next_deadline": "2024-03-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Focus on pattern of age-based terminations. Seek class certification.",
+                "settlement_authority": "$500,000",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-002",
+            "title": "Smith Family Trust - Estate Planning",
+            "matter_type": "estate",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Comprehensive estate planning including trust, will, and healthcare directives.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_002",
+                "name": "Robert Smith",
+                "email": "rsmith@email.com",
+                "phone": "555-0102",
+                "address": "456 Oak Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94301",
+                "is_individual": True,
+                "confidential_notes": "Net worth approximately $5M. Concerned about asset protection for grandchildren."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [],
+            "time_entries": [
+                {
+                    "entry_id": "time_003",
+                    "date": "2024-02-01",
+                    "description": "Initial consultation re estate planning goals",
+                    "hours": 2.0,
+                    "rate": 400.0,
+                    "billed_by": "Attorney Chen"
+                }
+            ],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Client has three adult children. Wants equal distribution but concerned about son's spending habits.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-02-01T14:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-02-01",
+                "document_deadline": "2024-04-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Create revocable living trust with spendthrift provisions for son's share.",
+                "settlement_authority": None,
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-003",
+            "title": "Acme Corp v. Competitor Inc - Trade Secret",
+            "matter_type": "litigation",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Trade secret misappropriation case involving former employee.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_003",
+                "name": "Acme Corporation",
+                "email": "legal@acmecorp.com",
+                "phone": "555-0103",
+                "address": "789 Innovation Blvd, San Jose, CA 95113",
+                "is_individual": False,
+                "company_contact": "Jennifer Lee, VP Legal",
+                "confidential_notes": "Trade secrets relate to proprietary manufacturing process worth $50M in R&D."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_002",
+                    "name": "Competitor Inc",
+                    "role": "defendant",
+                    "counsel_name": "Mark Johnson",
+                    "counsel_firm": "Tech Defenders LLP",
+                    "counsel_email": "mjohnson@techdefenders.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0300"
+                },
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_003",
+                    "name": "John Davis (Former Employee)",
+                    "role": "defendant",
+                    "counsel_name": "Susan White",
+                    "counsel_firm": "White Employment Law",
+                    "counsel_email": "swhite@whitelaw.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0301"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Evidence: Davis downloaded 5GB of files before resignation. IT forensics confirms.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-02-16T09:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-02-15",
+                "preliminary_injunction": "2024-03-01",
+                "discovery_deadline": "2024-08-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Seek immediate TRO/preliminary injunction. Pursue aggressive discovery.",
+                "settlement_authority": "$10,000,000",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-004",
+            "title": "Garcia Contract Negotiation",
+            "matter_type": "transactional",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Commercial lease negotiation for new restaurant location.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_004",
+                "name": "Maria Garcia",
+                "email": "mgarcia@garciarestaurants.com",
+                "phone": "555-0104",
+                "address": "321 Culinary Way, Oakland, CA 94612",
+                "is_individual": False,
+                "company_contact": "Maria Garcia, Owner",
+                "confidential_notes": "Opening third restaurant location. Budget for lease is $15K/month max."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_004",
+                    "name": "Downtown Properties LLC",
+                    "role": "landlord",
+                    "counsel_name": "Robert Brown",
+                    "counsel_firm": "Commercial RE Law Group",
+                    "counsel_email": "rbrown@crelaw.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0400"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Landlord initially offered $18K/month. Client willing to accept $16K with TI allowance.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-03-02T11:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-03-01",
+                "lease_deadline": "2024-04-15"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Negotiate for $16K with $100K TI allowance. Walk away if above $17K.",
+                "settlement_authority": "$17,000/month max",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-005",
+            "title": "People v. Thompson - Criminal Defense",
+            "matter_type": "criminal",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Defense of white-collar criminal charges - alleged securities fraud.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_005",
+                "name": "Michael Thompson",
+                "email": "mthompson@securemail.com",
+                "phone": "555-0105",
+                "address": "100 Executive Towers, San Francisco, CA 94104",
+                "is_individual": True,
+                "confidential_notes": "Former CFO accused of insider trading. Maintains innocence. High profile case."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_005",
+                    "name": "United States of America",
+                    "role": "prosecution",
+                    "counsel_name": "AUSA Patricia Martinez",
+                    "counsel_firm": "US Attorney's Office, NDCA",
+                    "counsel_email": "patricia.martinez@usdoj.gov",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0500"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Client claims trades were based on public information and independent analysis.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-03-10T15:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-03-10",
+                "arraignment": "2024-03-25",
+                "trial_date": "2024-09-15"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Challenge government's evidence of materiality and scienter. Consider cooperation if evidence is strong.",
+                "settlement_authority": "No plea unless misdemeanor",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        # Matters 6-10
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-006",
+            "title": "Williams IP Infringement Defense",
+            "matter_type": "intellectual_property",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Defense of patent infringement claims related to software algorithms.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_006",
+                "name": "Williams Software Inc",
+                "email": "legal@williamssoftware.com",
+                "phone": "555-0106",
+                "address": "100 Tech Park Dr, Austin, TX 78701",
+                "is_individual": False,
+                "company_contact": "David Williams, CTO",
+                "confidential_notes": "Company has $50M in annual revenue. Patent at issue covers key product feature."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_006",
+                    "name": "PatentCo Holdings LLC",
+                    "role": "plaintiff",
+                    "counsel_name": "Richard Chen",
+                    "counsel_firm": "IP Litigation Partners",
+                    "counsel_email": "rchen@iplitigation.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0600"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Prior art search reveals potential invalidating references from 2005.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-03-21T09:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-03-20",
+                "claim_construction": "2024-08-15",
+                "discovery_deadline": "2024-12-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Challenge patent validity with prior art. Alternatively, argue non-infringement based on claim construction.",
+                "settlement_authority": "$2,000,000",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-007",
+            "title": "Henderson Family Divorce",
+            "matter_type": "family",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "High-asset divorce proceeding with child custody dispute.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_007",
+                "name": "Margaret Henderson",
+                "email": "mhenderson@privatemail.com",
+                "phone": "555-0107",
+                "address": "500 Pacific Heights, San Francisco, CA 94115",
+                "is_individual": True,
+                "confidential_notes": "Combined marital assets approximately $15M. Husband has offshore accounts."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_007",
+                    "name": "James Henderson",
+                    "role": "respondent",
+                    "counsel_name": "Victoria Stone",
+                    "counsel_firm": "Stone Family Law",
+                    "counsel_email": "vstone@stonefamilylaw.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0700"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Client suspects husband is hiding assets in Cayman Islands entity.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-04-01T14:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-04-01",
+                "temporary_orders": "2024-04-15",
+                "mediation": "2024-06-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Aggressive discovery of financial records. Hire forensic accountant for asset tracing.",
+                "settlement_authority": "50% of marital assets plus primary custody",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-008",
+            "title": "Metro Construction Injury Claim",
+            "matter_type": "personal_injury",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Construction site accident resulting in serious injuries.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_008",
+                "name": "Carlos Ramirez",
+                "email": "cramirez@email.com",
+                "phone": "555-0108",
+                "address": "789 Worker Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90012",
+                "is_individual": True,
+                "confidential_notes": "Client suffered traumatic brain injury. Medical bills exceed $500K. Lost earning capacity."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_008",
+                    "name": "Metro Construction LLC",
+                    "role": "defendant",
+                    "counsel_name": "Thomas Wright",
+                    "counsel_firm": "Insurance Defense Associates",
+                    "counsel_email": "twright@idadefense.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0800"
+                },
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_008b",
+                    "name": "SafetyFirst Equipment Co",
+                    "role": "co-defendant",
+                    "counsel_name": "Linda Garcia",
+                    "counsel_firm": "Products Defense Group",
+                    "counsel_email": "lgarcia@pdglaw.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0801"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "OSHA records show multiple prior violations at job site. Strong negligence case.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-04-12T10:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-04-10",
+                "statute_of_limitations": "2026-04-10",
+                "expert_disclosure": "2024-10-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Pursue both general contractor and equipment manufacturer. Strong liability case based on OSHA violations.",
+                "settlement_authority": "$5,000,000",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-009",
+            "title": "TechStart Securities Class Action",
+            "matter_type": "securities",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Securities fraud class action following earnings restatement.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_009",
+                "name": "TechStart Inc",
+                "email": "legal@techstart.com",
+                "phone": "555-0109",
+                "address": "1 Innovation Blvd, Mountain View, CA 94043",
+                "is_individual": False,
+                "company_contact": "Susan Park, General Counsel",
+                "confidential_notes": "Restatement reduced revenue by $200M. CEO and CFO are individual defendants."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_009",
+                    "name": "Lead Plaintiff: California Public Employees Retirement System",
+                    "role": "plaintiff",
+                    "counsel_name": "Robert Kessler",
+                    "counsel_firm": "Kessler Securities Litigation",
+                    "counsel_email": "rkessler@ksl-law.com",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-0900"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Internal emails suggest CFO knew about revenue recognition issues. Must preserve all documents.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-05-02T16:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-05-01",
+                "motion_to_dismiss": "2024-07-01",
+                "class_certification": "2024-12-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "File strong motion to dismiss based on lack of scienter. If denied, prepare for settlement discussions.",
+                "settlement_authority": "$50,000,000 (D&O insurance limits)",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            "matter_id": "MTR-2024-010",
+            "title": "Green Valley Zoning Appeal",
+            "matter_type": "real_estate",
+            "status": "active",
+            "description": "Zoning variance appeal for mixed-use development project.",
+            "client": {
+                "id": "client_010",
+                "name": "Green Valley Developers LLC",
+                "email": "projects@greenvalleydev.com",
+                "phone": "555-0110",
+                "address": "200 Developer Plaza, Denver, CO 80202",
+                "is_individual": False,
+                "company_contact": "Michael Torres, Managing Partner",
+                "confidential_notes": "Project value $75M. Denial would cause $10M in sunk costs."
+            },
+            "opposing_parties": [
+                {
+                    "id": "opp_010",
+                    "name": "City of Greenwood Planning Commission",
+                    "role": "respondent",
+                    "counsel_name": "City Attorney Jennifer Adams",
+                    "counsel_firm": "City Attorney's Office",
+                    "counsel_email": "jadams@greenwoodcity.gov",
+                    "counsel_phone": "555-1000"
+                }
+            ],
+            "time_entries": [],
+            "notes": [
+                {
+                    "content": "Similar variance was granted to competitor development last year. Good precedent.",
+                    "created_at": "2024-05-16T11:00:00",
+                    "is_privileged": True
+                }
+            ],
+            "key_dates": {
+                "opened": "2024-05-15",
+                "appeal_deadline": "2024-06-15",
+                "hearing_date": "2024-08-01"
+            },
+            "strategy": {
+                "summary": "Emphasize community benefits and precedent from prior approvals. Rally community support.",
+                "settlement_authority": "Accept modified conditions if reasonable",
+                "is_confidential": True
+            }
+        }
+    ]
+
+    return matters
+
+
+def main():
+    """Main function to collect and save data."""
+    print("=" * 60)
+    print("Legal Data Collection Script")
+    print("=" * 60)
+
+    # Create data directories (matching data_loader.py expected structure)
+    cases_dir = os.path.join(DATA_DIR, "cases")
+    statutes_dir = os.path.join(DATA_DIR, "statutes")
+    templates_dir = os.path.join(DATA_DIR, "templates")
+    os.makedirs(cases_dir, exist_ok=True)
+    os.makedirs(statutes_dir, exist_ok=True)
+    os.makedirs(templates_dir, exist_ok=True)
+
+    # 1. Download and process Supreme Court data
+    print("\n[1/4] Collecting Supreme Court cases...")
+    corgis_data = download_supreme_court_corgis()
+
+    if corgis_data:
+        scotus_cases = convert_corgis_to_cases(corgis_data, limit=100)
+        print(f"Processed {len(scotus_cases)} Supreme Court cases")
+    else:
+        scotus_cases = []
+        print("Warning: Could not download CORGIS data")
+
+    # 2. Create synthetic lower court cases
+    print("\n[2/4] Generating lower court cases...")
+    lower_court_cases = create_synthetic_lower_court_cases(count=50)
+    print(f"Generated {len(lower_court_cases)} lower court cases")
+
+    # 3. Save cases in format expected by data_loader ({"cases": [...]})
+    all_cases = scotus_cases + lower_court_cases
+    cases_file = os.path.join(cases_dir, "real_cases.json")
+    with open(cases_file, 'w') as f:
+        json.dump({"cases": all_cases}, f, indent=2)
+    print(f"Saved {len(all_cases)} cases to {cases_file}")
+
+    # 4. Create and save statutes in format expected by data_loader ({"statutes": [...]})
+    print("\n[3/4] Creating statutes...")
+    all_statutes = create_additional_statutes()
+
+    statutes_file = os.path.join(statutes_dir, "federal.json")
+    with open(statutes_file, 'w') as f:
+        json.dump({"statutes": all_statutes}, f, indent=2)
+    print(f"Saved {len(all_statutes)} statutes to {statutes_file}")
+
+    # 5. Create and save additional matters (keep as flat array for matters.json)
+    print("\n[4/4] Creating client matters...")
+    all_matters = create_more_matters()
+
+    matters_file = os.path.join(DATA_DIR, "matters.json")
+    with open(matters_file, 'w') as f:
+        json.dump(all_matters, f, indent=2)
+    print(f"Saved {len(all_matters)} matters to {matters_file}")
+
+    # Summary
+    print("\n" + "=" * 60)
+    print("Data Collection Complete!")
+    print("=" * 60)
+    print(f"Cases: {len(all_cases)}")
+    print(f"Statutes: {len(all_statutes)}")
+    print(f"Matters: {len(all_matters)}")
+    print(f"Data directory: {DATA_DIR}")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()