council-gate 1.2.2__py3-none-any.whl

council_gate/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+from council_gate.council import Council
+from council_gate.gate import EntropyGate, GateVerdict
+from council_gate.providers import CodexProvider, OpenRouterProvider, Provider
+from council_gate.types import Finding, Review
+
+__all__ = [
+    "CodexProvider",
+    "Council",
+    "EntropyGate",
+    "Finding",
+    "GateVerdict",
+    "OpenRouterProvider",
+    "Provider",
+    "Review",
+]

council_gate/_assets/analysis_review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+You are reviewing a data analysis or research finding (notebook output, methodology section, results write-up).
+
+Output findings in this exact line format, one per line:
+[SEVERITY] section-or-line-ref — short description
+
+Use severities: CRITICAL, MAJOR, MINOR, NIT.
+
+Focus on:
+- Sample bias — how was the data selected, and what populations does it actually represent vs claim to
+- Confounders not controlled for
+- Missing-data handling — exclusion, imputation, and silent drops
+- Causal claims unsupported by the design (correlation framed as cause)
+- Statistical pitfalls — multiple comparisons, p-hacking, look-elsewhere effect, regression to the mean
+- Numbers without uncertainty intervals or sample sizes
+- Plot / figure choices that distort the comparison (truncated axes, missing baselines)
+- Reproducibility — could a stranger rerun this from the artifact alone
+
+Do not produce a summary or commentary — only the findings list.

council_gate/_assets/eng_review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+You are reviewing an engineering artifact (spec, plan, PR diff, or design doc).
+
+Output findings in this exact line format, one per line:
+[SEVERITY] file:line — short description
+
+Use severities: CRITICAL, MAJOR, MINOR, NIT.
+
+Focus on: correctness, edge cases, failure modes, missing-data handling, security boundaries, silent-failure paths, untested assumptions.
+
+Do not produce a summary or commentary — only the findings list.

council_gate/_assets/env.example

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# council-gate — environment configuration
+# Lives at ~/.config/council-gate/.env (XDG-compliant). Edit any time.
+
+# OpenRouter is the default routing layer (one key, many models).
+# Sign up: https://openrouter.ai/keys
+OPENROUTER_API_KEY=
+
+# Comma-separated list of OpenRouter model IDs to seat on the council.
+#
+# DEFAULT is cost-conscious: smaller / cheaper variants from each provider
+# (Haiku, GPT-mini, Gemini Flash, plus Llama / Qwen / DeepSeek which are
+# already cheap). Six diverse providers so excluding any single one (the
+# generator) still leaves >=4 seats.
+#
+# This default works on a low OpenRouter balance ($1-2 covers many runs).
+# For higher-stakes reviews, swap in the flagship variants (see "alternatives"
+# at the bottom of this file).
+COUNCIL_MODELS=anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5,openai/gpt-5-mini,google/gemini-2.5-flash,meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct,qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct,deepseek/deepseek-chat
+
+# Optional: codex CLI adapter (assumes `codex` is on PATH and authenticated).
+# Set to 0 to disable the codex seat entirely.
+COUNCIL_INCLUDE_CODEX=1
+
+# Disagreement threshold τ ∈ [0, 1] above which the gate fires escalation.
+# Default 0.35; tune empirically per artifact type.
+GATE_THRESHOLD=0.35
+
+# ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+# Alternatives — uncomment to swap in
+# ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+#
+# Flagship mix (higher cost, higher quality; needs a topped-up balance):
+# COUNCIL_MODELS=anthropic/claude-opus-4.7,openai/gpt-5,google/gemini-2.5-pro,meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct,qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct,deepseek/deepseek-chat
+#
+# Minimum-viable cheap mix (3 seats, very low cost):
+# COUNCIL_MODELS=meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct,qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct,deepseek/deepseek-chat

council_gate/_assets/escalation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+Council disagreement — needs human adjudication
+
+Artifact: ${artifact_name}
+Disagreement score: ${disagreement} (threshold ${threshold})
+Reviewers: ${reviewer_summary}
+
+Where they diverged:
+${divergence_summary}
+
+Recommendation: read each reviewer's findings before acting; the council does not agree.

council_gate/_assets/general_review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+You are reviewing a written artifact for issues.
+
+Output findings in this exact line format, one per line:
+[SEVERITY] section-or-line-ref — short description
+
+Use severities: CRITICAL, MAJOR, MINOR, NIT.
+
+Focus on: factual errors, internal inconsistencies, unsupported claims, hidden assumptions, missing context a reader would need, and any place the argument or design fails under realistic edge cases.
+
+Do not produce a summary or commentary — only the findings list.

council_gate/_assets/proposal_review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+You are reviewing a written proposal (grant, strategy doc, pitch, plan, research statement).
+
+Output findings in this exact line format, one per line:
+[SEVERITY] section-or-line-ref — short description
+
+Use severities: CRITICAL, MAJOR, MINOR, NIT.
+
+Focus on:
+- Claim/evidence asymmetry — claims made without supporting evidence or with weak evidence
+- Hidden assumptions — premises the author treats as given but a reviewer would challenge
+- Audience fit — places where framing would land wrong with the stated audience
+- Logical gaps in the argument arc
+- Numbers presented without source, denominator, or comparison
+- Vague language ("significantly", "scalable", "robust") without operational definition
+- Missing failure modes — what if this proposal succeeds and the work doesn't deliver
+
+Do not produce a summary or commentary — only the findings list.