clickzetta-semantic-model-generator 1.0.2__py3-none-any.whl → 1.0.3__py3-none-any.whl

semantic_model_generator/generate_model.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+import math
 import os
 import re
-import math
 from collections import defaultdict
 from datetime import datetime
 from typing import Any, Callable, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ from typing import Any, Callable, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
 from clickzetta.zettapark.session import Session
 from loguru import logger
 
-from semantic_model_generator.data_processing import data_types, proto_utils
-from semantic_model_generator.protos import semantic_model_pb2
 from semantic_model_generator.clickzetta_utils.clickzetta_connector import (
     AUTOGEN_TOKEN,
     DIMENSION_DATATYPES,
@@ -20,14 +18,19 @@ from semantic_model_generator.clickzetta_utils.clickzetta_connector import (
     get_valid_schemas_tables_columns_df,
 )
 from semantic_model_generator.clickzetta_utils.utils import create_fqn_table
-from semantic_model_generator.validate.context_length import validate_context_length
+from semantic_model_generator.data_processing import data_types, proto_utils
 from semantic_model_generator.llm import (
     DashscopeClient,
     DashscopeSettings,
     enrich_semantic_model,
     get_dashscope_settings,
 )
-from semantic_model_generator.llm.progress_tracker import EnrichmentProgressTracker, EnrichmentStage
+from semantic_model_generator.llm.progress_tracker import (
+    EnrichmentProgressTracker,
+    EnrichmentStage,
+)
+from semantic_model_generator.protos import semantic_model_pb2
+from semantic_model_generator.validate.context_length import validate_context_length
 from semantic_model_generator.validate.keywords import CZ_RESERVED_WORDS
 
 _PLACEHOLDER_COMMENT = "  "
@@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ _AUTOGEN_COMMENT_TOKEN = (
 _DEFAULT_N_SAMPLE_VALUES_PER_COL = 10
 _AUTOGEN_COMMENT_WARNING = f"# NOTE: This file was auto-generated by the semantic model generator. Please fill out placeholders marked with {_FILL_OUT_TOKEN} (or remove if not relevant) and verify autogenerated comments.\n"
 
+
 def _singularize(token: str) -> str:
     if token.endswith("IES") and len(token) > 3:
         return token[:-3] + "Y"
@@ -68,7 +72,9 @@ def _base_type_from_type(column_type: str) -> str:
     return token.split("(")[0]
 
 
-def _identifier_tokens(name: str, prefixes_to_drop: Optional[set[str]] = None) -> List[str]:
+def _identifier_tokens(
+    name: str, prefixes_to_drop: Optional[set[str]] = None
+) -> List[str]:
     name = name.replace("-", "_")
     raw_tokens = re.split(r"[^0-9A-Za-z]+", name)
     tokens: List[str] = []
@@ -84,7 +90,9 @@ def _identifier_tokens(name: str, prefixes_to_drop: Optional[set[str]] = None) -
     return tokens
 
 
-def _sanitize_identifier_name(name: str, prefixes_to_drop: Optional[set[str]] = None) -> str:
+def _sanitize_identifier_name(
+    name: str, prefixes_to_drop: Optional[set[str]] = None
+) -> str:
     if not name:
         return ""
 
@@ -271,7 +279,9 @@ def _looks_like_primary_key(table_name: str, column_name: str) -> bool:
         "PRIMARY_KEY",
     }
     for variant in variants:
-        direct_matches.update({f"{variant}_ID", f"{variant}ID", f"{variant}_KEY", f"{variant}KEY"})
+        direct_matches.update(
+            {f"{variant}_ID", f"{variant}ID", f"{variant}_KEY", f"{variant}KEY"}
+        )
     if upper_name in direct_matches:
         return True
 
@@ -368,7 +378,7 @@ def _levenshtein_distance(s1: str, s2: str) -> int:
         return _levenshtein_distance(s2, s1)
     if len(s2) == 0:
         return len(s1)
-    
+
     previous_row = range(len(s2) + 1)
     for i, c1 in enumerate(s1):
         current_row = [i + 1]
@@ -378,7 +388,7 @@ def _levenshtein_distance(s1: str, s2: str) -> int:
             substitutions = previous_row[j] + (c1 != c2)
             current_row.append(min(insertions, deletions, substitutions))
         previous_row = current_row
-    
+
     return previous_row[-1]
 
 
@@ -389,26 +399,26 @@ def _name_similarity(name1: str, name2: str) -> float:
     """
     if not name1 or not name2:
         return 0.0
-    
+
     # Exact match
     if name1.upper() == name2.upper():
         return 1.0
-    
+
     # Normalize names for comparison
     norm1 = name1.upper().replace("_", "").replace("-", "")
     norm2 = name2.upper().replace("_", "").replace("-", "")
-    
+
     if norm1 == norm2:
         return 0.95
-    
+
     # Calculate Levenshtein-based similarity
     max_len = max(len(norm1), len(norm2))
     if max_len == 0:
         return 0.0
-    
+
     distance = _levenshtein_distance(norm1, norm2)
     similarity = 1.0 - (distance / max_len)
-    
+
     return max(0.0, similarity)
 
 
@@ -427,17 +437,24 @@ def _analyze_composite_key_patterns(
         Dict with composite key analysis results
     """
     pk_candidates = table_meta.get("pk_candidates", {})
-    columns_meta = table_meta.get("columns", {})
 
     # Check if all relationship columns form a composite key
-    relationship_cols = [pair[0] if isinstance(pair, tuple) else pair for pair in column_pairs]
+    relationship_cols = [
+        pair[0] if isinstance(pair, tuple) else pair for pair in column_pairs
+    ]
 
     # Normalize column names for comparison
     global_prefixes = set()  # This should come from context but we'll handle it locally
-    table_prefixes = _table_prefixes(list(table_meta.get("columns", {}).keys())[0] if table_meta.get("columns") else "")
+    table_prefixes = _table_prefixes(
+        list(table_meta.get("columns", {}).keys())[0]
+        if table_meta.get("columns")
+        else ""
+    )
 
     normalized_rel_cols = [
-        _sanitize_identifier_name(col, prefixes_to_drop=global_prefixes | table_prefixes)
+        _sanitize_identifier_name(
+            col, prefixes_to_drop=global_prefixes | table_prefixes
+        )
         for col in relationship_cols
     ]
 
@@ -448,7 +465,9 @@ def _analyze_composite_key_patterns(
     analysis = {
         "is_composite_pk": pk_col_count > 1 and pk_col_count == total_pk_candidates,
         "partial_pk": pk_col_count > 0 and pk_col_count < total_pk_candidates,
-        "pk_coverage_ratio": pk_col_count / total_pk_candidates if total_pk_candidates > 0 else 0,
+        "pk_coverage_ratio": (
+            pk_col_count / total_pk_candidates if total_pk_candidates > 0 else 0
+        ),
         "relationship_column_count": len(relationship_cols),
         "pk_column_count": pk_col_count,
     }
@@ -457,7 +476,10 @@ def _analyze_composite_key_patterns(
     if len(relationship_cols) > 1:
         sequential_patterns = []
         for col in relationship_cols:
-            if any(pattern in col.upper() for pattern in ["_ID", "ID", "_KEY", "KEY", "_NUM", "NUM"]):
+            if any(
+                pattern in col.upper()
+                for pattern in ["_ID", "ID", "_KEY", "KEY", "_NUM", "NUM"]
+            ):
                 sequential_patterns.append(col)
 
         analysis["sequential_id_pattern"] = len(sequential_patterns) >= 2
@@ -504,9 +526,12 @@ def _infer_composite_cardinality(
     # Rule 3: Composite key uniqueness analysis (if we have sufficient samples)
     MIN_SAMPLE_SIZE = 20  # Lower threshold for composite keys
 
-    if (left_values_all and right_values_all and
-        len(left_values_all) >= MIN_SAMPLE_SIZE and
-        len(right_values_all) >= MIN_SAMPLE_SIZE):
+    if (
+        left_values_all
+        and right_values_all
+        and len(left_values_all) >= MIN_SAMPLE_SIZE
+        and len(right_values_all) >= MIN_SAMPLE_SIZE
+    ):
 
         # Create composite keys by concatenating values
         left_composite_keys = []
@@ -515,10 +540,12 @@ def _infer_composite_cardinality(
         sample_size = min(len(left_values_all), len(right_values_all))
 
         for i in range(sample_size):
-            left_key = "|".join(str(vals[i]) if i < len(vals) else ""
-                              for vals in left_values_all)
-            right_key = "|".join(str(vals[i]) if i < len(vals) else ""
-                               for vals in right_values_all)
+            left_key = "|".join(
+                str(vals[i]) if i < len(vals) else "" for vals in left_values_all
+            )
+            right_key = "|".join(
+                str(vals[i]) if i < len(vals) else "" for vals in right_values_all
+            )
 
             if left_key and not _is_nullish(left_key):
                 left_composite_keys.append(left_key)
@@ -527,7 +554,9 @@ def _infer_composite_cardinality(
 
         if left_composite_keys and right_composite_keys:
             left_unique_ratio = len(set(left_composite_keys)) / len(left_composite_keys)
-            right_unique_ratio = len(set(right_composite_keys)) / len(right_composite_keys)
+            right_unique_ratio = len(set(right_composite_keys)) / len(
+                right_composite_keys
+            )
 
             # Lower threshold for composite key uniqueness
             if right_unique_ratio > 0.9:
@@ -561,6 +590,7 @@ def _infer_composite_cardinality(
             adaptive_thresholds=adaptive_thresholds,
         )
 
+
 def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
     table_meta: Dict[str, Any],
     all_tables_meta: Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]],
@@ -606,7 +636,9 @@ def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
         base_type = col_info.get("base_type", "")
 
         # Check if column looks like an ID/foreign key
-        if any(pattern in original_name.upper() for pattern in ["_ID", "ID", "_KEY", "KEY"]):
+        if any(
+            pattern in original_name.upper() for pattern in ["_ID", "ID", "_KEY", "KEY"]
+        ):
             id_columns.append(original_name)
 
             # Check if this could be a foreign key to another table
@@ -615,11 +647,13 @@ def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
                     continue
 
                 if _looks_like_foreign_key(table_name, other_table_name, original_name):
-                    fk_like_columns.append({
-                        "column": original_name,
-                        "references_table": other_table_name,
-                        "confidence": 0.8
-                    })
+                    fk_like_columns.append(
+                        {
+                            "column": original_name,
+                            "references_table": other_table_name,
+                            "confidence": 0.8,
+                        }
+                    )
                     break
 
                 # Check if column name contains the other table name
@@ -628,11 +662,13 @@ def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
 
                 for variant in other_variants:
                     if variant in col_tokens:
-                        fk_like_columns.append({
-                            "column": original_name,
-                            "references_table": other_table_name,
-                            "confidence": 0.6
-                        })
+                        fk_like_columns.append(
+                            {
+                                "column": original_name,
+                                "references_table": other_table_name,
+                                "confidence": 0.6,
+                            }
+                        )
                         break
         else:
             # Count descriptive/non-ID columns
@@ -680,8 +716,18 @@ def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
     # Name-based heuristics
     table_upper = table_name.upper()
     bridge_keywords = {
-        "BRIDGE", "JUNCTION", "LINK", "ASSOC", "ASSOCIATION", "REL", "RELATIONSHIP",
-        "MAP", "MAPPING", "XREF", "CROSS_REF", "CONNECTOR"
+        "BRIDGE",
+        "JUNCTION",
+        "LINK",
+        "ASSOC",
+        "ASSOCIATION",
+        "REL",
+        "RELATIONSHIP",
+        "MAP",
+        "MAPPING",
+        "XREF",
+        "CROSS_REF",
+        "CONNECTOR",
     }
 
     for keyword in bridge_keywords:
@@ -708,7 +754,9 @@ def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
 
     is_bridge = confidence >= 0.6  # Threshold for bridge table classification
 
-    connected_tables = [fk["references_table"] for fk in fk_like_columns if fk["confidence"] >= 0.5]
+    connected_tables = [
+        fk["references_table"] for fk in fk_like_columns if fk["confidence"] >= 0.5
+    ]
 
     return {
         "is_bridge": is_bridge,
@@ -718,14 +766,14 @@ def _detect_bridge_table_pattern(
         "fk_ratio": fk_ratio,
         "id_ratio": id_ratio,
         "total_columns": total_columns,
-        "descriptive_columns": descriptive_columns
+        "descriptive_columns": descriptive_columns,
     }
 
 
 def _detect_many_to_many_relationships(
     raw_tables: List[tuple[data_types.FQNParts, data_types.Table]],
     metadata: Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]],
-    existing_relationships: List[semantic_model_pb2.Relationship]
+    existing_relationships: List[semantic_model_pb2.Relationship],
 ) -> List[semantic_model_pb2.Relationship]:
     """
     Detect many-to-many relationships through bridge table analysis.
@@ -746,7 +794,10 @@ def _detect_many_to_many_relationships(
     for table_name, table_meta in metadata.items():
         bridge_analysis = _detect_bridge_table_pattern(table_meta, metadata)
 
-        if bridge_analysis["is_bridge"] and len(bridge_analysis["connected_tables"]) >= 2:
+        if (
+            bridge_analysis["is_bridge"]
+            and len(bridge_analysis["connected_tables"]) >= 2
+        ):
             bridge_tables[table_name] = bridge_analysis
 
             logger.debug(
@@ -780,9 +831,15 @@ def _detect_many_to_many_relationships(
                 right_fk_cols = []
 
                 for fk_info in bridge_info["fk_like_columns"]:
-                    if fk_info["references_table"] == left_table and fk_info["confidence"] >= 0.5:
+                    if (
+                        fk_info["references_table"] == left_table
+                        and fk_info["confidence"] >= 0.5
+                    ):
                         left_fk_cols.append(fk_info["column"])
-                    elif fk_info["references_table"] == right_table and fk_info["confidence"] >= 0.5:
+                    elif (
+                        fk_info["references_table"] == right_table
+                        and fk_info["confidence"] >= 0.5
+                    ):
                         right_fk_cols.append(fk_info["column"])
 
                 if not left_fk_cols or not right_fk_cols:
@@ -806,8 +863,12 @@ def _detect_many_to_many_relationships(
                     # Use the first detected FK columns as a representative
                     relationship.relationship_columns.append(
                         semantic_model_pb2.RelationKey(
-                            left_column=left_fk_cols[0],  # This is actually in the bridge table
-                            right_column=right_fk_cols[0],  # This is also in the bridge table
+                            left_column=left_fk_cols[
+                                0
+                            ],  # This is actually in the bridge table
+                            right_column=right_fk_cols[
+                                0
+                            ],  # This is also in the bridge table
                         )
                     )
 
@@ -863,13 +924,19 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
         pk_confidence = 0.4
         confidence_score += pk_confidence
         if left_has_pk and right_has_pk:
-            reasoning_factors.append("Both sides have primary key metadata (very strong evidence)")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                "Both sides have primary key metadata (very strong evidence)"
+            )
             evidence_details["pk_evidence"] = "both_pk"
         elif right_has_pk:
-            reasoning_factors.append("Right side has primary key metadata (strong evidence)")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                "Right side has primary key metadata (strong evidence)"
+            )
             evidence_details["pk_evidence"] = "right_pk"
         elif left_has_pk:
-            reasoning_factors.append("Left side has primary key metadata (strong evidence)")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                "Left side has primary key metadata (strong evidence)"
+            )
             evidence_details["pk_evidence"] = "left_pk"
 
     # Factor 2: Name similarity and pattern matching
@@ -884,19 +951,29 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
 
         if avg_name_similarity >= 0.9:
             name_confidence = 0.25
-            reasoning_factors.append(f"Very high column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                f"Very high column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})"
+            )
         elif avg_name_similarity >= 0.7:
             name_confidence = 0.2
-            reasoning_factors.append(f"High column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                f"High column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})"
+            )
         elif avg_name_similarity >= 0.5:
             name_confidence = 0.15
-            reasoning_factors.append(f"Moderate column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                f"Moderate column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})"
+            )
         elif avg_name_similarity >= 0.3:
             name_confidence = 0.1
-            reasoning_factors.append(f"Low column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                f"Low column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})"
+            )
         else:
             name_confidence = 0.05
-            reasoning_factors.append(f"Very low column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                f"Very low column name similarity ({avg_name_similarity:.2f})"
+            )
 
         confidence_score += name_confidence
 
@@ -905,7 +982,9 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
         for left_col, right_col in column_pairs:
             if _looks_like_foreign_key(left_table, right_table, left_col):
                 fk_pattern_confidence += 0.1
-                reasoning_factors.append(f"Column '{left_col}' follows FK naming pattern")
+                reasoning_factors.append(
+                    f"Column '{left_col}' follows FK naming pattern"
+                )
 
         confidence_score += min(fk_pattern_confidence, 0.2)
 
@@ -927,29 +1006,45 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
 
                 # Check if uniqueness pattern matches inferred cardinality
                 left_card, right_card = cardinality_result
-                uniqueness_threshold = adaptive_thresholds.get("uniqueness_threshold", 0.95) if adaptive_thresholds else 0.95
+                uniqueness_threshold = (
+                    adaptive_thresholds.get("uniqueness_threshold", 0.95)
+                    if adaptive_thresholds
+                    else 0.95
+                )
 
                 cardinality_consistency = False
                 if left_card == "1" and left_unique_ratio > uniqueness_threshold:
                     cardinality_consistency = True
-                elif left_card in ("*", "+") and left_unique_ratio <= uniqueness_threshold:
+                elif (
+                    left_card in ("*", "+")
+                    and left_unique_ratio <= uniqueness_threshold
+                ):
                     cardinality_consistency = True
 
                 if right_card == "1" and right_unique_ratio > uniqueness_threshold:
                     cardinality_consistency = cardinality_consistency and True
-                elif right_card in ("*", "+") and right_unique_ratio <= uniqueness_threshold:
+                elif (
+                    right_card in ("*", "+")
+                    and right_unique_ratio <= uniqueness_threshold
+                ):
                     cardinality_consistency = cardinality_consistency and True
 
                 if cardinality_consistency:
                     uniqueness_confidence = 0.2
-                    reasoning_factors.append("Sample uniqueness patterns support inferred cardinality")
+                    reasoning_factors.append(
+                        "Sample uniqueness patterns support inferred cardinality"
+                    )
                 else:
                     uniqueness_confidence = 0.1
-                    reasoning_factors.append("Sample uniqueness patterns partially support cardinality")
+                    reasoning_factors.append(
+                        "Sample uniqueness patterns partially support cardinality"
+                    )
 
                 confidence_score += uniqueness_confidence
         else:
-            reasoning_factors.append(f"Limited sample size ({sample_size}) reduces confidence")
+            reasoning_factors.append(
+                f"Limited sample size ({sample_size}) reduces confidence"
+            )
 
     # Factor 4: Data type compatibility
     if column_pairs and left_meta and right_meta:
@@ -992,15 +1087,21 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
     evidence_details["left_table_role"] = left_role
     evidence_details["right_table_role"] = right_role
 
-    relationship_context = _get_business_relationship_context(left_table, right_table, left_role, right_role)
+    relationship_context = _get_business_relationship_context(
+        left_table, right_table, left_role, right_role
+    )
     evidence_details["relationship_context"] = relationship_context
 
     if relationship_context in ["fact_to_dimension", "dimension_to_fact"]:
         role_confidence = 0.15
-        reasoning_factors.append(f"Strong business relationship pattern: {relationship_context}")
+        reasoning_factors.append(
+            f"Strong business relationship pattern: {relationship_context}"
+        )
     elif relationship_context in ["dimension_hierarchy", "bridge_relationship"]:
         role_confidence = 0.1
-        reasoning_factors.append(f"Valid business relationship pattern: {relationship_context}")
+        reasoning_factors.append(
+            f"Valid business relationship pattern: {relationship_context}"
+        )
     elif relationship_context == "fact_to_fact":
         role_confidence = 0.05
         reasoning_factors.append("Unusual but possible fact-to-fact relationship")
@@ -1013,7 +1114,9 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
     # Factor 6: Multiple column relationships (composite keys)
     if len(column_pairs) > 1:
         composite_confidence = 0.1
-        reasoning_factors.append(f"Multi-column relationship ({len(column_pairs)} columns) increases confidence")
+        reasoning_factors.append(
+            f"Multi-column relationship ({len(column_pairs)} columns) increases confidence"
+        )
         confidence_score += composite_confidence
 
     # Normalize confidence score to 0-1 range
@@ -1043,7 +1146,9 @@ def _calculate_relationship_confidence(
         "reasoning_factors": reasoning_factors,
         "evidence_details": evidence_details,
         "inferred_cardinality": f"{cardinality_result[0]}:{cardinality_result[1]}",
-        "join_type": "INNER" if join_type == semantic_model_pb2.JoinType.inner else "LEFT_OUTER",
+        "join_type": (
+            "INNER" if join_type == semantic_model_pb2.JoinType.inner else "LEFT_OUTER"
+        ),
         "column_count": len(column_pairs),
     }
 
@@ -1059,101 +1164,196 @@ def _get_domain_knowledge_patterns() -> Dict[str, Any]:
         # Common business entity patterns
         "business_entities": {
             "customer": {
-                "table_patterns": ["CUSTOMER", "CUST", "CLIENT", "ACCOUNT_HOLDER", "USER", "MEMBER"],
-                "pk_patterns": ["CUSTOMER_ID", "CUST_ID", "CLIENT_ID", "USER_ID", "MEMBER_ID"],
-                "typical_attributes": ["NAME", "EMAIL", "PHONE", "ADDRESS", "STATUS", "TYPE", "SEGMENT"],
-                "role": "dimension"
+                "table_patterns": [
+                    "CUSTOMER",
+                    "CUST",
+                    "CLIENT",
+                    "ACCOUNT_HOLDER",
+                    "USER",
+                    "MEMBER",
+                ],
+                "pk_patterns": [
+                    "CUSTOMER_ID",
+                    "CUST_ID",
+                    "CLIENT_ID",
+                    "USER_ID",
+                    "MEMBER_ID",
+                ],
+                "typical_attributes": [
+                    "NAME",
+                    "EMAIL",
+                    "PHONE",
+                    "ADDRESS",
+                    "STATUS",
+                    "TYPE",
+                    "SEGMENT",
+                ],
+                "role": "dimension",
             },
             "product": {
                 "table_patterns": ["PRODUCT", "ITEM", "SKU", "INVENTORY", "CATALOG"],
                 "pk_patterns": ["PRODUCT_ID", "ITEM_ID", "SKU", "PRODUCT_KEY"],
-                "typical_attributes": ["NAME", "DESCRIPTION", "CATEGORY", "PRICE", "BRAND", "STATUS"],
-                "role": "dimension"
+                "typical_attributes": [
+                    "NAME",
+                    "DESCRIPTION",
+                    "CATEGORY",
+                    "PRICE",
+                    "BRAND",
+                    "STATUS",
+                ],
+                "role": "dimension",
             },
             "order": {
                 "table_patterns": ["ORDER", "TRANSACTION", "SALE", "PURCHASE"],
-                "pk_patterns": ["ORDER_ID", "TRANSACTION_ID", "SALE_ID", "ORDER_NUMBER"],
+                "pk_patterns": [
+                    "ORDER_ID",
+                    "TRANSACTION_ID",
+                    "SALE_ID",
+                    "ORDER_NUMBER",
+                ],
                 "typical_attributes": ["DATE", "AMOUNT", "STATUS", "QUANTITY", "TOTAL"],
-                "role": "fact"
+                "role": "fact",
             },
             "date": {
                 "table_patterns": ["DATE", "TIME", "CALENDAR", "DIM_DATE"],
                 "pk_patterns": ["DATE_ID", "DATE_KEY", "TIME_ID"],
-                "typical_attributes": ["YEAR", "MONTH", "DAY", "QUARTER", "WEEK", "WEEKDAY"],
-                "role": "dimension"
+                "typical_attributes": [
+                    "YEAR",
+                    "MONTH",
+                    "DAY",
+                    "QUARTER",
+                    "WEEK",
+                    "WEEKDAY",
+                ],
+                "role": "dimension",
             },
             "location": {
-                "table_patterns": ["LOCATION", "GEOGRAPHY", "ADDRESS", "REGION", "TERRITORY"],
+                "table_patterns": [
+                    "LOCATION",
+                    "GEOGRAPHY",
+                    "ADDRESS",
+                    "REGION",
+                    "TERRITORY",
+                ],
                 "pk_patterns": ["LOCATION_ID", "GEO_ID", "ADDRESS_ID", "REGION_ID"],
-                "typical_attributes": ["COUNTRY", "STATE", "CITY", "ZIP", "LATITUDE", "LONGITUDE"],
-                "role": "dimension"
+                "typical_attributes": [
+                    "COUNTRY",
+                    "STATE",
+                    "CITY",
+                    "ZIP",
+                    "LATITUDE",
+                    "LONGITUDE",
+                ],
+                "role": "dimension",
             },
             "employee": {
                 "table_patterns": ["EMPLOYEE", "STAFF", "WORKER", "PERSONNEL"],
                 "pk_patterns": ["EMPLOYEE_ID", "STAFF_ID", "EMP_ID"],
-                "typical_attributes": ["NAME", "DEPARTMENT", "TITLE", "MANAGER", "HIRE_DATE"],
-                "role": "dimension"
-            }
+                "typical_attributes": [
+                    "NAME",
+                    "DEPARTMENT",
+                    "TITLE",
+                    "MANAGER",
+                    "HIRE_DATE",
+                ],
+                "role": "dimension",
+            },
         },
-
         # Common relationship patterns in data warehouses
         "relationship_patterns": {
             "star_schema": {
                 "pattern": "fact_to_dimension",
                 "confidence_boost": 0.2,
-                "description": "Standard star schema fact-to-dimension relationship"
+                "description": "Standard star schema fact-to-dimension relationship",
             },
             "snowflake_schema": {
                 "pattern": "dimension_hierarchy",
                 "confidence_boost": 0.15,
-                "description": "Snowflake schema dimension hierarchy"
+                "description": "Snowflake schema dimension hierarchy",
             },
             "bridge_table": {
                 "pattern": "many_to_many_via_bridge",
                 "confidence_boost": 0.1,
-                "description": "Many-to-many relationship through bridge table"
+                "description": "Many-to-many relationship through bridge table",
             },
             "time_dimension": {
                 "pattern": "temporal_relationship",
                 "confidence_boost": 0.25,
-                "description": "Time-based relationship (very common in warehouses)"
-            }
+                "description": "Time-based relationship (very common in warehouses)",
+            },
         },
-
         # Known FK patterns that often appear in real data warehouses
         "common_fk_patterns": {
             "customer_references": [
-                "CUSTOMER_ID", "CUST_ID", "CLIENT_ID", "ACCOUNT_ID", "USER_ID"
+                "CUSTOMER_ID",
+                "CUST_ID",
+                "CLIENT_ID",
+                "ACCOUNT_ID",
+                "USER_ID",
             ],
             "product_references": [
-                "PRODUCT_ID", "ITEM_ID", "SKU", "PROD_ID", "CATALOG_ID"
+                "PRODUCT_ID",
+                "ITEM_ID",
+                "SKU",
+                "PROD_ID",
+                "CATALOG_ID",
             ],
             "date_references": [
-                "DATE_ID", "ORDER_DATE_ID", "SHIP_DATE_ID", "CREATE_DATE_ID",
-                "TRANSACTION_DATE_ID", "DATE_KEY"
+                "DATE_ID",
+                "ORDER_DATE_ID",
+                "SHIP_DATE_ID",
+                "CREATE_DATE_ID",
+                "TRANSACTION_DATE_ID",
+                "DATE_KEY",
             ],
             "location_references": [
-                "LOCATION_ID", "ADDRESS_ID", "SHIP_TO_ID", "BILL_TO_ID",
-                "WAREHOUSE_ID", "STORE_ID"
-            ]
+                "LOCATION_ID",
+                "ADDRESS_ID",
+                "SHIP_TO_ID",
+                "BILL_TO_ID",
+                "WAREHOUSE_ID",
+                "STORE_ID",
+            ],
         },
-
         # Table naming conventions that indicate specific patterns
         "naming_conventions": {
             "fact_indicators": [
-                "FACT_", "FCT_", "F_", "SALES_", "ORDERS_", "TRANSACTIONS_",
-                "REVENUE_", "METRICS_", "EVENTS_", "ACTIVITY_"
+                "FACT_",
+                "FCT_",
+                "F_",
+                "SALES_",
+                "ORDERS_",
+                "TRANSACTIONS_",
+                "REVENUE_",
+                "METRICS_",
+                "EVENTS_",
+                "ACTIVITY_",
             ],
             "dimension_indicators": [
-                "DIM_", "D_", "REF_", "LKP_", "LOOKUP_", "MASTER_"
+                "DIM_",
+                "D_",
+                "REF_",
+                "LKP_",
+                "LOOKUP_",
+                "MASTER_",
             ],
             "bridge_indicators": [
-                "BRG_", "BRIDGE_", "XREF_", "MAP_", "ASSOC_", "LINK_"
+                "BRG_",
+                "BRIDGE_",
+                "XREF_",
+                "MAP_",
+                "ASSOC_",
+                "LINK_",
             ],
             "staging_indicators": [
-                "STG_", "STAGING_", "TMP_", "TEMP_", "RAW_", "LANDING_"
-            ]
-        }
+                "STG_",
+                "STAGING_",
+                "TMP_",
+                "TEMP_",
+                "RAW_",
+                "LANDING_",
+            ],
+        },
     }
 
 
@@ -1204,18 +1404,26 @@ def _apply_domain_knowledge(
         if entity_pair in common_pairs:
             boost = common_pairs[entity_pair]
             confidence_boost += boost
-            enhancement_factors.append(f"Recognized common business pattern: {entity_pair} (+{boost:.2f})")
+            enhancement_factors.append(
+                f"Recognized common business pattern: {entity_pair} (+{boost:.2f})"
+            )
         elif f"{right_entity}-{left_entity}" in common_pairs:
             boost = common_pairs[f"{right_entity}-{left_entity}"]
             confidence_boost += boost
-            enhancement_factors.append(f"Recognized common business pattern: {right_entity}-{left_entity} (+{boost:.2f})")
+            enhancement_factors.append(
+                f"Recognized common business pattern: {right_entity}-{left_entity} (+{boost:.2f})"
+            )
 
     # Factor 2: Check for standard FK naming patterns
     for left_col, right_col in column_pairs:
-        fk_pattern_match = _check_standard_fk_patterns(left_col, right_col, domain_patterns)
+        fk_pattern_match = _check_standard_fk_patterns(
+            left_col, right_col, domain_patterns
+        )
         if fk_pattern_match:
             confidence_boost += 0.15
-            enhancement_factors.append(f"Standard FK pattern detected: {fk_pattern_match}")
+            enhancement_factors.append(
+                f"Standard FK pattern detected: {fk_pattern_match}"
+            )
 
     # Factor 3: Table naming convention analysis
     left_convention = _identify_naming_convention(left_table, domain_patterns)
@@ -1223,8 +1431,9 @@ def _apply_domain_knowledge(
 
     if left_convention and right_convention:
         # Boost confidence for expected patterns
-        if (left_convention == "fact" and right_convention == "dimension") or \
-           (left_convention == "dimension" and right_convention == "fact"):
+        if (left_convention == "fact" and right_convention == "dimension") or (
+            left_convention == "dimension" and right_convention == "fact"
+        ):
             confidence_boost += 0.2
             enhancement_factors.append("Standard fact-dimension naming pattern (+0.20)")
         elif left_convention == "dimension" and right_convention == "dimension":
@@ -1237,12 +1446,20 @@ def _apply_domain_knowledge(
         enhancement_factors.append("Time dimension relationship (very common) (+0.20)")
 
     # Factor 5: Schema pattern recognition (star vs snowflake)
-    schema_pattern = _detect_schema_pattern(left_table, right_table, left_meta, right_meta, domain_patterns)
+    schema_pattern = _detect_schema_pattern(
+        left_table, right_table, left_meta, right_meta, domain_patterns
+    )
     if schema_pattern:
-        pattern_boost = domain_patterns["relationship_patterns"][schema_pattern]["confidence_boost"]
+        pattern_boost = domain_patterns["relationship_patterns"][schema_pattern][
+            "confidence_boost"
+        ]
         confidence_boost += pattern_boost
-        pattern_desc = domain_patterns["relationship_patterns"][schema_pattern]["description"]
-        enhancement_factors.append(f"Schema pattern: {pattern_desc} (+{pattern_boost:.2f})")
+        pattern_desc = domain_patterns["relationship_patterns"][schema_pattern][
+            "description"
+        ]
+        enhancement_factors.append(
+            f"Schema pattern: {pattern_desc} (+{pattern_boost:.2f})"
+        )
 
     # Apply the boost but cap the final confidence at 1.0
     enhanced_confidence = min(current_confidence + confidence_boost, 1.0)
@@ -1259,7 +1476,9 @@ def _apply_domain_knowledge(
     }
 
 
-def _identify_business_entity(table_name: str, table_meta: Dict[str, Any], domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]) -> Optional[str]:
+def _identify_business_entity(
+    table_name: str, table_meta: Dict[str, Any], domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]
+) -> Optional[str]:
     """Identify what business entity a table represents."""
     table_upper = table_name.upper()
     business_entities = domain_patterns["business_entities"]
@@ -1274,13 +1493,18 @@ def _identify_business_entity(table_name: str, table_meta: Dict[str, Any], domai
         pk_candidates = table_meta.get("pk_candidates", {})
         for pk_pattern in entity_info["pk_patterns"]:
             for pk_norm in pk_candidates.keys():
-                if pk_pattern.replace("_", "").upper() in pk_norm.replace("_", "").upper():
+                if (
+                    pk_pattern.replace("_", "").upper()
+                    in pk_norm.replace("_", "").upper()
+                ):
                     return entity_type
 
     return None
 
 
-def _check_standard_fk_patterns(left_col: str, right_col: str, domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]) -> Optional[str]:
+def _check_standard_fk_patterns(
+    left_col: str, right_col: str, domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]
+) -> Optional[str]:
     """Check if column pair matches standard FK patterns."""
     common_fks = domain_patterns["common_fk_patterns"]
 
@@ -1295,7 +1519,9 @@ def _check_standard_fk_patterns(left_col: str, right_col: str, domain_patterns:
     return None
 
 
-def _identify_naming_convention(table_name: str, domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]) -> Optional[str]:
+def _identify_naming_convention(
+    table_name: str, domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]
+) -> Optional[str]:
     """Identify the naming convention used for a table."""
     table_upper = table_name.upper()
     naming_conventions = domain_patterns["naming_conventions"]
@@ -1308,7 +1534,9 @@ def _identify_naming_convention(table_name: str, domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]
     return None
 
 
-def _is_time_dimension_pattern(table_name: str, table_meta: Dict[str, Any], domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
+def _is_time_dimension_pattern(
+    table_name: str, table_meta: Dict[str, Any], domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]
+) -> bool:
     """Check if table follows time dimension patterns."""
     table_upper = table_name.upper()
     time_patterns = domain_patterns["business_entities"]["date"]["table_patterns"]
@@ -1344,15 +1572,16 @@ def _detect_schema_pattern(
     right_table: str,
     left_meta: Dict[str, Any],
     right_meta: Dict[str, Any],
-    domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any]
+    domain_patterns: Dict[str, Any],
 ) -> Optional[str]:
     """Detect common schema patterns (star, snowflake, etc.)."""
     left_role = _detect_table_role(left_table, left_meta)
     right_role = _detect_table_role(right_table, right_meta)
 
     # Star schema pattern: fact table to dimension
-    if (left_role == "fact" and right_role == "dimension") or \
-       (left_role == "dimension" and right_role == "fact"):
+    if (left_role == "fact" and right_role == "dimension") or (
+        left_role == "dimension" and right_role == "fact"
+    ):
         return "star_schema"
 
     # Snowflake schema pattern: dimension to dimension
@@ -1360,8 +1589,9 @@ def _detect_schema_pattern(
         return "snowflake_schema"
 
     # Time dimension pattern (very common)
-    if _is_time_dimension_pattern(right_table, right_meta, domain_patterns) or \
-       _is_time_dimension_pattern(left_table, left_meta, domain_patterns):
+    if _is_time_dimension_pattern(
+        right_table, right_meta, domain_patterns
+    ) or _is_time_dimension_pattern(left_table, left_meta, domain_patterns):
         return "time_dimension"
 
     # Bridge table pattern
@@ -1397,7 +1627,9 @@ def _calculate_adaptive_thresholds(
     # Calculate sample statistics
     sample_sizes = [len(vals) for vals in values_list if vals]
     max_sample_size = max(sample_sizes) if sample_sizes else base_sample_size
-    avg_sample_size = sum(sample_sizes) / len(sample_sizes) if sample_sizes else base_sample_size
+    avg_sample_size = (
+        sum(sample_sizes) / len(sample_sizes) if sample_sizes else base_sample_size
+    )
 
     # Calculate data distribution characteristics
     total_unique_values = 0
@@ -1425,7 +1657,7 @@ def _calculate_adaptive_thresholds(
             if len(value_counts) > 1:
                 max_freq = max(value_counts.values())
                 min_freq = min(value_counts.values())
-                skew = max_freq / min_freq if min_freq > 0 else float('inf')
+                skew = max_freq / min_freq if min_freq > 0 else float("inf")
                 skew_ratios.append(skew)
 
     # Calculate overall uniqueness ratio
@@ -1459,7 +1691,9 @@ def _calculate_adaptive_thresholds(
         min_size_adj *= 1.1
 
     # Scale with base sample size from configuration
-    size_scale_factor = min(max_sample_size / base_sample_size, 3.0) if base_sample_size > 0 else 1.0
+    size_scale_factor = (
+        min(max_sample_size / base_sample_size, 3.0) if base_sample_size > 0 else 1.0
+    )
     min_size_adj *= size_scale_factor
 
     thresholds["min_sample_size"] = max(int(base_min_size * min_size_adj), 10)
@@ -1594,8 +1828,12 @@ def _infer_cardinality(
         left_non_null = [v for v in left_values if not _is_nullish(v)]
         right_non_null = [v for v in right_values if not _is_nullish(v)]
 
-        left_unique_ratio = len(set(left_non_null)) / len(left_non_null) if left_non_null else 0
-        right_unique_ratio = len(set(right_non_null)) / len(right_non_null) if right_non_null else 0
+        left_unique_ratio = (
+            len(set(left_non_null)) / len(left_non_null) if left_non_null else 0
+        )
+        right_unique_ratio = (
+            len(set(right_non_null)) / len(right_non_null) if right_non_null else 0
+        )
 
         # Apply adaptive uniqueness threshold
         left_is_unique = left_unique_ratio > uniqueness_threshold
@@ -1691,11 +1929,19 @@ def _detect_table_role(table_name: str, columns_info: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
     Returns:
         str: Table role ('fact', 'dimension', 'bridge', 'staging', 'unknown')
     """
-    upper_name = table_name.upper()
     tokens = _identifier_tokens(table_name)
 
     # Rule 1: Explicit prefixes/suffixes
-    fact_indicators = {"FACT", "FCT", "TXN", "TRANSACTION", "EVENT", "LOG", "SALES", "ORDER"}
+    fact_indicators = {
+        "FACT",
+        "FCT",
+        "TXN",
+        "TRANSACTION",
+        "EVENT",
+        "LOG",
+        "SALES",
+        "ORDER",
+    }
     dim_indicators = {"DIM", "DIMENSION", "LOOKUP", "REF", "REFERENCE", "MASTER"}
     bridge_indicators = {"BRIDGE", "BRG", "LINK", "JUNCTION", "ASSOC", "ASSOCIATION"}
     staging_indicators = {"STG", "STAGING", "TMP", "TEMP", "WORK", "LANDING", "RAW"}
@@ -1734,9 +1980,22 @@ def _detect_table_role(table_name: str, columns_info: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
                 id_count += 1
 
             # Count measure-like columns (amounts, counts, quantities)
-            if any(word in col_name for word in ["AMOUNT", "QTY", "QUANTITY", "COUNT", "TOTAL", "SUM", "AVG"]):
+            if any(
+                word in col_name
+                for word in [
+                    "AMOUNT",
+                    "QTY",
+                    "QUANTITY",
+                    "COUNT",
+                    "TOTAL",
+                    "SUM",
+                    "AVG",
+                ]
+            ):
                 measure_like_count += 1
-            elif base_type in MEASURE_DATATYPES and not col_info.get("is_identifier", False):
+            elif base_type in MEASURE_DATATYPES and not col_info.get(
+                "is_identifier", False
+            ):
                 measure_like_count += 1
             else:
                 dimension_like_count += 1
@@ -1761,7 +2020,9 @@ def _detect_table_role(table_name: str, columns_info: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
     return "unknown"
 
 
-def _get_business_relationship_context(left_table: str, right_table: str, left_role: str, right_role: str) -> str:
+def _get_business_relationship_context(
+    left_table: str, right_table: str, left_role: str, right_role: str
+) -> str:
     """
     Determine business relationship context between tables based on their roles.
 
@@ -1833,7 +2094,7 @@ def _infer_join_type(
         4. Naming pattern heuristics
         5. Conservative INNER JOIN default
     """
-    
+
     # RULE 1: Default to INNER JOIN (most common and safest)
     default_join = semantic_model_pb2.JoinType.inner
 
@@ -1861,9 +2122,17 @@ def _infer_join_type(
         # Apply business rules based on relationship context
         if relationship_context == "fact_to_dimension":
             # Fact → Dimension: usually INNER, but check for optional dimensions
-            if any(keyword in right_table.upper() for keyword in [
-                "PROMO", "PROMOTION", "DISCOUNT", "COUPON", "OPTIONAL", "SECONDARY"
-            ]):
+            if any(
+                keyword in right_table.upper()
+                for keyword in [
+                    "PROMO",
+                    "PROMOTION",
+                    "DISCOUNT",
+                    "COUPON",
+                    "OPTIONAL",
+                    "SECONDARY",
+                ]
+            ):
                 logger.debug(
                     f"Join type inference for {left_table} -> {right_table}: "
                     f"LEFT_OUTER (fact to optional dimension: {right_role})"
@@ -1907,11 +2176,19 @@ def _infer_join_type(
             return semantic_model_pb2.JoinType.left_outer
 
     # RULE 5: Naming pattern heuristics for optional relationships
-    left_upper = left_table.upper()
     right_upper = right_table.upper()
     optional_keywords = {
-        "OPTIONAL", "ALTERNATE", "SECONDARY", "BACKUP", "FALLBACK",
-        "PROMO", "PROMOTION", "DISCOUNT", "COUPON", "TEMP", "TMP"
+        "OPTIONAL",
+        "ALTERNATE",
+        "SECONDARY",
+        "BACKUP",
+        "FALLBACK",
+        "PROMO",
+        "PROMOTION",
+        "DISCOUNT",
+        "COUPON",
+        "TEMP",
+        "TMP",
     }
 
     for keyword in optional_keywords:
@@ -1946,12 +2223,17 @@ def _looks_like_foreign_key(fk_table: str, pk_table: str, fk_column: str) -> boo
     """
     fk_upper = fk_column.strip().upper()
     pk_table_variants = _table_variants(pk_table)
-    
+
     # Pattern 1: {table_name}_id or {table_name}_key
     for variant in pk_table_variants:
-        if fk_upper in {f"{variant}_ID", f"{variant}ID", f"{variant}_KEY", f"{variant}KEY"}:
+        if fk_upper in {
+            f"{variant}_ID",
+            f"{variant}ID",
+            f"{variant}_KEY",
+            f"{variant}KEY",
+        }:
             return True
-    
+
     # Pattern 2: Column ends with table name variants
     tokens = _identifier_tokens(fk_column)
     if len(tokens) >= 2:
@@ -1961,21 +2243,23 @@ def _looks_like_foreign_key(fk_table: str, pk_table: str, fk_column: str) -> boo
                 tail = tokens[-1]
                 if tail in {"ID", "KEY"}:
                     return True
-    
+
     # Pattern 3: Similar to primary key column but with FK table prefix
     # e.g., order_id in order_items table referencing orders.id
     fk_table_variants = _table_variants(fk_table)
     for fk_variant in fk_table_variants:
         if fk_upper.startswith(fk_variant):
-            remainder = fk_upper[len(fk_variant):].lstrip("_")
+            remainder = fk_upper[len(fk_variant) :].lstrip("_")
             for pk_variant in pk_table_variants:
                 if remainder.startswith(pk_variant):
                     return True
-    
+
     return False
 
 
-def _suggest_filters(raw_table: data_types.Table) -> List[semantic_model_pb2.NamedFilter]:
+def _suggest_filters(
+    raw_table: data_types.Table,
+) -> List[semantic_model_pb2.NamedFilter]:
     suggestions: List[semantic_model_pb2.NamedFilter] = []
     for col in raw_table.columns:
         base_type = _base_type_from_type(col.column_type)
@@ -2011,12 +2295,20 @@ def _suggest_filters(raw_table: data_types.Table) -> List[semantic_model_pb2.Nam
             )
             is_textual = base_type in {"STRING", "TEXT", "VARCHAR", "CHAR", "CHARACTER"}
             is_boolean = base_type in {"BOOLEAN"}
-            is_categorical_numeric = base_type in {"INT", "INTEGER", "NUMBER", "SMALLINT", "BIGINT"} and any(
-                upper_name.endswith(suffix) for suffix in categorical_suffixes
-            )
-
-            if not is_identifier_like and (is_textual or is_boolean or is_categorical_numeric):
-                formatted = [_format_literal(val, base_type) for val in distinct_values[:5]]
+            is_categorical_numeric = base_type in {
+                "INT",
+                "INTEGER",
+                "NUMBER",
+                "SMALLINT",
+                "BIGINT",
+            } and any(upper_name.endswith(suffix) for suffix in categorical_suffixes)
+
+            if not is_identifier_like and (
+                is_textual or is_boolean or is_categorical_numeric
+            ):
+                formatted = [
+                    _format_literal(val, base_type) for val in distinct_values[:5]
+                ]
                 expr = f"{col.column_name} IN ({', '.join(formatted)})"
                 suggestions.append(
                     semantic_model_pb2.NamedFilter(
@@ -2060,7 +2352,9 @@ def _infer_relationships(
         table_prefixes = global_prefixes | _table_prefixes(raw_table.name)
         for column in raw_table.columns:
             base_type = _base_type_from_type(column.column_type)
-            normalized = _sanitize_identifier_name(column.column_name, prefixes_to_drop=table_prefixes)
+            normalized = _sanitize_identifier_name(
+                column.column_name, prefixes_to_drop=table_prefixes
+            )
             entry = columns_meta.setdefault(
                 normalized,
                 {
@@ -2075,7 +2369,9 @@ def _infer_relationships(
             entry["names"].append(column.column_name)
             if column.values:
                 entry["values"].extend(column.values)
-            entry["is_identifier"] = entry["is_identifier"] or _is_identifier_like(column.column_name, base_type)
+            entry["is_identifier"] = entry["is_identifier"] or _is_identifier_like(
+                column.column_name, base_type
+            )
             is_primary = getattr(column, "is_primary_key", False)
             if is_primary:
                 entry["is_primary"] = True
@@ -2093,7 +2389,9 @@ def _infer_relationships(
     pairs: dict[tuple[str, str], List[tuple[str, str]]] = {}
     null_check_cache: Dict[Tuple[str, str, str, str], bool] = {}
 
-    def _record_pair(left_table: str, right_table: str, left_col: str, right_col: str) -> None:
+    def _record_pair(
+        left_table: str, right_table: str, left_col: str, right_col: str
+    ) -> None:
         key = (left_table, right_table)
         value = (left_col, right_col)
         if value not in pairs.setdefault(key, []):
@@ -2158,7 +2456,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
                         continue
                     if norm_b == pk_norm:
                         continue
-                    
+
                     # Direct suffix match
                     if norm_b.endswith(pk_norm):
                         _record_pair(
@@ -2168,23 +2466,34 @@ def _infer_relationships(
                             pk_cols[0],
                         )
                         continue
-                    
+
                     # Enhanced: Check if column looks like a foreign key to this table
-                    if _looks_like_foreign_key(table_b_name, table_a_name, meta_b["names"][0]):
+                    if _looks_like_foreign_key(
+                        table_b_name, table_a_name, meta_b["names"][0]
+                    ):
                         # Additional check: name similarity with adaptive threshold
                         similarity = _name_similarity(norm_b, pk_norm)
                         # Calculate adaptive threshold for this relationship
                         all_sample_values = []
-                        for col_values in [pk_meta.get("values", []), meta_b.get("values", [])]:
+                        for col_values in [
+                            pk_meta.get("values", []),
+                            meta_b.get("values", []),
+                        ]:
                             if col_values:
                                 all_sample_values.append(col_values)
 
                         adaptive_thresholds = _calculate_adaptive_thresholds(
                             all_sample_values,
                             table_count=len(raw_tables),
-                            base_sample_size=len(pk_meta.get("values", [])) if pk_meta.get("values") else 10,
+                            base_sample_size=(
+                                len(pk_meta.get("values", []))
+                                if pk_meta.get("values")
+                                else 10
+                            ),
+                        )
+                        similarity_threshold = adaptive_thresholds.get(
+                            "similarity_threshold", 0.6
                         )
-                        similarity_threshold = adaptive_thresholds.get("similarity_threshold", 0.6)
 
                         if similarity >= similarity_threshold:
                             _record_pair(
@@ -2204,7 +2513,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
                         continue
                     if norm_a == pk_norm:
                         continue
-                    
+
                     # Direct suffix match
                     if norm_a.endswith(pk_norm):
                         _record_pair(
@@ -2214,23 +2523,34 @@ def _infer_relationships(
                             pk_cols[0],
                         )
                         continue
-                    
+
                     # Enhanced: Check if column looks like a foreign key to this table
-                    if _looks_like_foreign_key(table_a_name, table_b_name, meta_a["names"][0]):
+                    if _looks_like_foreign_key(
+                        table_a_name, table_b_name, meta_a["names"][0]
+                    ):
                         # Additional check: name similarity with adaptive threshold
                         similarity = _name_similarity(norm_a, pk_norm)
                         # Calculate adaptive threshold for this relationship
                         all_sample_values = []
-                        for col_values in [pk_meta.get("values", []), meta_a.get("values", [])]:
+                        for col_values in [
+                            pk_meta.get("values", []),
+                            meta_a.get("values", []),
+                        ]:
                             if col_values:
                                 all_sample_values.append(col_values)
 
                         adaptive_thresholds = _calculate_adaptive_thresholds(
                             all_sample_values,
                             table_count=len(raw_tables),
-                            base_sample_size=len(pk_meta.get("values", [])) if pk_meta.get("values") else 10,
+                            base_sample_size=(
+                                len(pk_meta.get("values", []))
+                                if pk_meta.get("values")
+                                else 10
+                            ),
+                        )
+                        similarity_threshold = adaptive_thresholds.get(
+                            "similarity_threshold", 0.6
                         )
-                        similarity_threshold = adaptive_thresholds.get("similarity_threshold", 0.6)
 
                         if similarity >= similarity_threshold:
                             _record_pair(
@@ -2258,7 +2578,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
         # Infer cardinality based on available metadata
         left_meta = metadata[left_table]
         right_meta = metadata[right_table]
-        
+
         # Determine if tables have primary keys in the relationship
         left_has_pk = any(
             col_name in [pair[0] for pair in column_pairs]
@@ -2270,7 +2590,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
             for pk_list in right_meta["pk_candidates"].values()
             for col_name in pk_list
         )
-        
+
         # Enhanced: Get sample values for all columns in the relationship (for composite key analysis)
         left_values_all = []
         right_values_all = []
@@ -2279,12 +2599,11 @@ def _infer_relationships(
 
         for left_col, right_col in column_pairs:
             left_col_key = _sanitize_identifier_name(
-                left_col,
-                prefixes_to_drop=global_prefixes | _table_prefixes(left_table)
+                left_col, prefixes_to_drop=global_prefixes | _table_prefixes(left_table)
             )
             right_col_key = _sanitize_identifier_name(
                 right_col,
-                prefixes_to_drop=global_prefixes | _table_prefixes(right_table)
+                prefixes_to_drop=global_prefixes | _table_prefixes(right_table),
             )
 
             left_col_values = []
@@ -2293,7 +2612,9 @@ def _infer_relationships(
             if left_col_key in left_meta["columns"]:
                 left_col_values = left_meta["columns"][left_col_key].get("values") or []
             if right_col_key in right_meta["columns"]:
-                right_col_values = right_meta["columns"][right_col_key].get("values") or []
+                right_col_values = (
+                    right_meta["columns"][right_col_key].get("values") or []
+                )
 
             left_values_all.append(left_col_values)
             right_values_all.append(right_col_values)
@@ -2322,7 +2643,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
                 right_has_pk,
                 adaptive_thresholds=global_adaptive_thresholds,
             )
-        
+
         # Determine if SQL null probe should be executed for stricter inference
         strict_fk_detected = False
         if strict_join_inference and session:
@@ -2352,7 +2673,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
             left_table_meta=left_meta,
             right_table_meta=right_meta,
         )
-        
+
         # Calculate confidence and reasoning for this relationship
         confidence_analysis = _calculate_relationship_confidence(
             left_table=left_table,
@@ -2376,45 +2697,54 @@ def _infer_relationships(
             column_pairs=column_pairs,
             left_meta=left_meta,
             right_meta=right_meta,
-            current_confidence=confidence_analysis['confidence_score']
+            current_confidence=confidence_analysis["confidence_score"],
         )
 
         # Update confidence analysis with domain knowledge
-        if domain_enhancement['confidence_boost'] > 0:
-            confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] = min(1.0,
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] + domain_enhancement['confidence_boost'])
+        if domain_enhancement["confidence_boost"] > 0:
+            confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] = min(
+                1.0,
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_score"]
+                + domain_enhancement["confidence_boost"],
+            )
 
             # Add domain knowledge factors to reasoning
-            for domain_factor in domain_enhancement['domain_factors']:
-                confidence_analysis['reasoning_factors'].append(f"Domain knowledge: {domain_factor}")
+            for domain_factor in domain_enhancement["domain_factors"]:
+                confidence_analysis["reasoning_factors"].append(
+                    f"Domain knowledge: {domain_factor}"
+                )
 
             # Update confidence level based on new score
-            if confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] >= 0.8:
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_level'] = 'very_high'
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_description'] = 'Very High Confidence'
-            elif confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] >= 0.6:
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_level'] = 'high'
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_description'] = 'High Confidence'
-            elif confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] >= 0.4:
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_level'] = 'medium'
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_description'] = 'Medium Confidence'
-            elif confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] >= 0.2:
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_level'] = 'low'
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_description'] = 'Low Confidence'
+            if confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] >= 0.8:
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_level"] = "very_high"
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_description"] = "Very High Confidence"
+            elif confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] >= 0.6:
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_level"] = "high"
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_description"] = "High Confidence"
+            elif confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] >= 0.4:
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_level"] = "medium"
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_description"] = "Medium Confidence"
+            elif confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] >= 0.2:
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_level"] = "low"
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_description"] = "Low Confidence"
             else:
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_level'] = 'very_low'
-                confidence_analysis['confidence_description'] = 'Very Low Confidence'
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_level"] = "very_low"
+                confidence_analysis["confidence_description"] = "Very Low Confidence"
 
         # Enhanced logging with confidence and reasoning
         sample_info = f"samples: L={len(left_values)}, R={len(right_values)}"
         pk_info = f"PKs: L={left_has_pk}, R={right_has_pk}"
-        join_type_name = "INNER" if join_type == semantic_model_pb2.JoinType.inner else "LEFT_OUTER"
+        join_type_name = (
+            "INNER" if join_type == semantic_model_pb2.JoinType.inner else "LEFT_OUTER"
+        )
         confidence_info = f"confidence: {confidence_analysis['confidence_score']:.2f} ({confidence_analysis['confidence_level']})"
 
         # Add domain knowledge info if applied
         domain_info = ""
-        if domain_enhancement['confidence_boost'] > 0:
-            domain_info = f", domain boost: +{domain_enhancement['confidence_boost']:.2f}"
+        if domain_enhancement["confidence_boost"] > 0:
+            domain_info = (
+                f", domain boost: +{domain_enhancement['confidence_boost']:.2f}"
+            )
 
         logger.info(
             f"Relationship inference for {left_table} -> {right_table}: "
@@ -2423,22 +2753,30 @@ def _infer_relationships(
         )
 
         # Log domain knowledge patterns if detected
-        domain_factors = [f for f in confidence_analysis['reasoning_factors'] if f.startswith("Domain knowledge:")]
+        domain_factors = [
+            f
+            for f in confidence_analysis["reasoning_factors"]
+            if f.startswith("Domain knowledge:")
+        ]
         if domain_factors:
-            logger.debug(f"Domain patterns detected for {left_table} -> {right_table}: {domain_factors}")
+            logger.debug(
+                f"Domain patterns detected for {left_table} -> {right_table}: {domain_factors}"
+            )
 
         # Log detailed reasoning for medium or lower confidence relationships
-        if confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] < 0.6:
+        if confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] < 0.6:
             logger.debug(f"Confidence reasoning for {left_table} -> {right_table}:")
-            for factor in confidence_analysis['reasoning_factors']:
+            for factor in confidence_analysis["reasoning_factors"]:
                 logger.debug(f"  - {factor}")
 
         # Log very high confidence relationships with their evidence
-        elif confidence_analysis['confidence_score'] >= 0.8:
-            logger.debug(f"High confidence relationship {left_table} -> {right_table} based on:")
-            for factor in confidence_analysis['reasoning_factors'][:3]:  # Top 3 factors
+        elif confidence_analysis["confidence_score"] >= 0.8:
+            logger.debug(
+                f"High confidence relationship {left_table} -> {right_table} based on:"
+            )
+            for factor in confidence_analysis["reasoning_factors"][:3]:  # Top 3 factors
                 logger.debug(f"  + {factor}")
-        
+
         # Determine relationship type based on cardinality
         if left_card == "1" and right_card == "1":
             rel_type = semantic_model_pb2.RelationshipType.one_to_one
@@ -2449,7 +2787,7 @@ def _infer_relationships(
         else:
             # Default to many_to_one for backward compatibility
             rel_type = semantic_model_pb2.RelationshipType.many_to_one
-        
+
         relationship = semantic_model_pb2.Relationship(
             name=f"{left_table}_to_{right_table}",
             left_table=left_table,
@@ -2472,9 +2810,13 @@ def _infer_relationships(
 
     if many_to_many_relationships:
         relationships.extend(many_to_many_relationships)
-        logger.info(f"Detected {len(many_to_many_relationships)} many-to-many relationships via bridge tables")
+        logger.info(
+            f"Detected {len(many_to_many_relationships)} many-to-many relationships via bridge tables"
+        )
 
-    logger.info(f"Inferred {len(relationships)} total relationships across {len(raw_tables)} tables")
+    logger.info(
+        f"Inferred {len(relationships)} total relationships across {len(raw_tables)} tables"
+    )
     return relationships
 
 
@@ -2512,7 +2854,14 @@ def _raw_table_to_semantic_context_table(
         base_type = _base_type_from_type(col.column_type)
         if _is_time_like_column(col):
             time_data_type = col.column_type
-            if time_data_type.split("(")[0].upper() in {"STRING", "VARCHAR", "TEXT", "CHAR", "CHARACTER", "NVARCHAR"}:
+            if time_data_type.split("(")[0].upper() in {
+                "STRING",
+                "VARCHAR",
+                "TEXT",
+                "CHAR",
+                "CHARACTER",
+                "NVARCHAR",
+            }:
                 time_data_type = "TIMESTAMP_NTZ"
             time_dimension_name = _safe_semantic_identifier(
                 col.column_name,
@@ -2564,7 +2913,9 @@ def _raw_table_to_semantic_context_table(
                         data_type=col.column_type,
                         sample_values=col.values,
                         synonyms=[_PLACEHOLDER_COMMENT],
-                        description=col.comment if col.comment else _PLACEHOLDER_COMMENT,
+                        description=(
+                            col.comment if col.comment else _PLACEHOLDER_COMMENT
+                        ),
                     )
                 )
                 continue
@@ -2685,7 +3036,9 @@ def raw_schema_to_semantic_context(
             unique_database_schema.append(fqn_databse_schema)
 
         logger.info(f"Pulling column information from {fqn_table}")
-        _notify(f"Fetching metadata for {fqn_table.database}.{fqn_table.schema_name}.{fqn_table.table}...")
+        _notify(
+            f"Fetching metadata for {fqn_table.database}.{fqn_table.schema_name}.{fqn_table.table}..."
+        )
         valid_schemas_tables_columns_df = get_valid_schemas_tables_columns_df(
             session=conn,
             workspace=fqn_table.database,
@@ -2751,7 +3104,9 @@ def raw_schema_to_semantic_context(
                 semantic_model_name,
                 actual_model,
             )
-            _notify("Running DashScope enrichment to enhance descriptions and metrics...")
+            _notify(
+                "Running DashScope enrichment to enhance descriptions and metrics..."
+            )
 
             # Create progress tracker for enrichment
             def enrichment_progress_callback(update):
@@ -2760,14 +3115,16 @@ def raw_schema_to_semantic_context(
                     EnrichmentStage.MODEL_DESCRIPTION: "Generating model description",
                     EnrichmentStage.MODEL_METRICS: "Generating model-level metrics",
                     EnrichmentStage.VERIFIED_QUERIES: "Generating verified queries",
-                    EnrichmentStage.COMPLETE: "Enrichment complete"
+                    EnrichmentStage.COMPLETE: "Enrichment complete",
                 }
 
                 base_message = stage_messages.get(update.stage, "Processing")
                 if update.table_name:
                     message = f"{base_message} - {update.table_name} ({update.current_step}/{update.total_steps})"
                 elif update.total_steps > 1:
-                    message = f"{base_message} ({update.current_step}/{update.total_steps})"
+                    message = (
+                        f"{base_message} ({update.current_step}/{update.total_steps})"
+                    )
                 else:
                     message = base_message
 
@@ -2801,7 +3158,9 @@ def raw_schema_to_semantic_context(
             )
             _notify("DashScope enrichment complete.")
         else:
-            logger.warning("LLM enrichment was requested but DashScope is not configured; skipping enrichment.")
+            logger.warning(
+                "LLM enrichment was requested but DashScope is not configured; skipping enrichment."
+            )
             _notify("DashScope configuration missing; skipped enrichment.")
     return context
 
@@ -2938,6 +3297,7 @@ def generate_model_str_from_clickzetta(
     Returns:
         str: The raw string of the semantic context.
     """
+
     def _notify(message: str) -> None:
         if progress_callback:
             try:
@@ -2946,7 +3306,11 @@ def generate_model_str_from_clickzetta(
                 logger.debug("Progress callback failed for message: {}", message)
 
     table_list = ", ".join(base_tables)
-    logger.info("Generating semantic model '{}' from tables: {}", semantic_model_name, table_list)
+    logger.info(
+        "Generating semantic model '{}' from tables: {}",
+        semantic_model_name,
+        table_list,
+    )
     _notify("Collecting metadata from ClickZetta tables...")
 
     context = raw_schema_to_semantic_context(