buildlog 0.7.0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.8.0__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (38) hide show
  1. buildlog/__init__.py +1 -1
  2. buildlog/cli.py +436 -44
  3. buildlog/confidence.py +27 -0
  4. buildlog/core/__init__.py +2 -0
  5. buildlog/core/bandit.py +699 -0
  6. buildlog/core/operations.py +265 -11
  7. buildlog/distill.py +80 -1
  8. buildlog/engine/__init__.py +61 -0
  9. buildlog/engine/bandit.py +23 -0
  10. buildlog/engine/confidence.py +28 -0
  11. buildlog/engine/embeddings.py +28 -0
  12. buildlog/engine/experiments.py +619 -0
  13. buildlog/engine/types.py +31 -0
  14. buildlog/llm.py +461 -0
  15. buildlog/mcp/server.py +6 -6
  16. buildlog/mcp/tools.py +61 -13
  17. buildlog/render/__init__.py +19 -2
  18. buildlog/render/claude_md.py +67 -32
  19. buildlog/render/continue_dev.py +102 -0
  20. buildlog/render/copilot.py +100 -0
  21. buildlog/render/cursor.py +105 -0
  22. buildlog/render/windsurf.py +95 -0
  23. buildlog/skills.py +69 -6
  24. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/copier.yml +0 -4
  25. buildlog-0.8.0.data/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/_TEMPLATE_QUICK.md +21 -0
  26. buildlog-0.8.0.dist-info/METADATA +151 -0
  27. buildlog-0.8.0.dist-info/RECORD +54 -0
  28. buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/METADATA +0 -544
  29. buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/RECORD +0 -41
  30. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/post_gen.py +0 -0
  31. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/.gitkeep +0 -0
  32. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/2026-01-01-example.md +0 -0
  33. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/BUILDLOG_SYSTEM.md +0 -0
  34. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/_TEMPLATE.md +0 -0
  35. {buildlog-0.7.0.data → buildlog-0.8.0.data}/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/assets/.gitkeep +0 -0
  36. {buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info → buildlog-0.8.0.dist-info}/WHEEL +0 -0
  37. {buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info → buildlog-0.8.0.dist-info}/entry_points.txt +0 -0
  38. {buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info → buildlog-0.8.0.dist-info}/licenses/LICENSE +0 -0
@@ -1,544 +0,0 @@
1
- Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
- Name: buildlog
3
- Version: 0.7.0
4
- Summary: Engineering notebook for AI-assisted development
5
- Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/Peleke/buildlog-template
6
- Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/Peleke/buildlog-template
7
- Author: Peleke Sengstacke
8
- License-Expression: MIT
9
- License-File: LICENSE
10
- Keywords: ai,buildlog,development,documentation,journal
11
- Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
12
- Classifier: Environment :: Console
13
- Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
14
- Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
15
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
16
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
17
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
18
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
19
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
20
- Classifier: Topic :: Documentation
21
- Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Documentation
22
- Requires-Python: >=3.10
23
- Requires-Dist: click>=8.0.0
24
- Requires-Dist: copier>=9.0.0
25
- Requires-Dist: numpy>=1.21.0
26
- Requires-Dist: pyyaml>=6.0.0
27
- Provides-Extra: all
28
- Requires-Dist: mcp>=1.0.0; extra == 'all'
29
- Requires-Dist: openai>=1.0.0; extra == 'all'
30
- Requires-Dist: sentence-transformers>=2.2.0; extra == 'all'
31
- Provides-Extra: dev
32
- Requires-Dist: black>=24.0.0; extra == 'dev'
33
- Requires-Dist: flake8>=7.0.0; extra == 'dev'
34
- Requires-Dist: isort>=5.13.0; extra == 'dev'
35
- Requires-Dist: mypy>=1.8.0; extra == 'dev'
36
- Requires-Dist: pre-commit>=3.6.0; extra == 'dev'
37
- Requires-Dist: pytest-asyncio>=0.21.0; extra == 'dev'
38
- Requires-Dist: pytest-cov>=4.0.0; extra == 'dev'
39
- Requires-Dist: pytest>=7.0.0; extra == 'dev'
40
- Requires-Dist: types-pyyaml>=6.0.0; extra == 'dev'
41
- Provides-Extra: embeddings
42
- Requires-Dist: sentence-transformers>=2.2.0; extra == 'embeddings'
43
- Provides-Extra: mcp
44
- Requires-Dist: mcp>=1.0.0; extra == 'mcp'
45
- Provides-Extra: openai
46
- Requires-Dist: openai>=1.0.0; extra == 'openai'
47
- Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
48
-
49
- <div align="center">
50
-
51
- # buildlog
52
-
53
- ### The Only Agent Learning System You Can Prove Works
54
-
55
- [![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/buildlog?style=for-the-badge&logo=pypi&logoColor=white)](https://pypi.org/project/buildlog/)
56
- [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/buildlog?style=for-the-badge&logo=python&logoColor=white)](https://python.org/)
57
- [![CI](https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/Peleke/buildlog-template/ci.yml?branch=main&style=for-the-badge&logo=github&label=CI)](https://github.com/Peleke/buildlog-template/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
58
- [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg?style=for-the-badge)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
59
-
60
- **Falsifiable claims. Measurable outcomes. No vibes.**
61
-
62
- <img src="assets/hero-banner-perfectdeliberate.png" alt="buildlog - The Only Agent Learning System You Can Prove Works" width="800"/>
63
-
64
- > **RE: The art** — Yes, it's AI-generated. Yes, that's hypocritical for a project about rigor over vibes. Looking for an actual artist to pay for a real logo. If you know someone good, [open an issue](https://github.com/Peleke/buildlog-template/issues) or DM me. Budget exists.
65
-
66
- [The Problem](#the-problem) · [The Claim](#the-claim) · [The Mechanism](#the-mechanism) · [Quick Start](#quick-start) · [Review Gauntlet](#review-gauntlet)
67
-
68
- ---
69
-
70
- </div>
71
-
72
- ## The Problem
73
-
74
- Everyone's building "agent memory." Blog posts announce breakthroughs. Tweets show impressive demos. Products ship with "learning" in the tagline.
75
-
76
- Ask them one question: **How do you know it works?**
77
-
78
- You'll get:
79
- - "It feels smarter"
80
- - "Users report better results"
81
- - "The agent remembers things now"
82
-
83
- That's not evidence. That's vibes.
84
-
85
- Here's what a real answer looks like:
86
-
87
- > "We track Repeated Mistake Rate (RMR) across sessions. Our null hypothesis is that the system makes no difference. After 50 sessions, RMR decreased from 34% to 12% (p < 0.01). The effect size is 0.65. Here's the data."
88
-
89
- If you can't say something like that, you don't have agent learning. You have a demo.
90
-
91
- ---
92
-
93
- ## The Claim
94
-
95
- **buildlog** makes a falsifiable claim:
96
-
97
- > **H₀ (Null Hypothesis):** buildlog makes no measurable difference to agent behavior.
98
- >
99
- > **H₁ (Alternative):** Agents using buildlog-learned rules have lower Repeated Mistake Rate than baseline.
100
-
101
- We provide the infrastructure to **reject or fail to reject** this hypothesis with your own data.
102
-
103
- If buildlog doesn't work, the numbers will show it. That's the point.
104
-
105
- ---
106
-
107
- ## The Metric: Repeated Mistake Rate (RMR)
108
-
109
- ```
110
- RMR = (Mistakes that match previous mistakes) / (Total mistakes logged)
111
- ```
112
-
113
- A mistake "matches" if it has the same semantic signature—same error class, similar description, same root cause showing up again.
114
-
115
- **Why RMR?**
116
- - **Observable**: You can count it
117
- - **Attributable**: Lower RMR after rule injection = signal
118
- - **Meaningful**: Repeating mistakes is the actual pain point
119
-
120
- RMR is not the only metric that matters. But it's one we can measure, and measurement is where science starts.
121
-
122
- ---
123
-
124
- ## The Mechanism
125
-
126
- buildlog is building toward **contextual bandits** for automatic rule selection. Here's where we are:
127
-
128
- ### What Exists Today (v0.7)
129
-
130
- ```
131
- ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
132
- │ CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE │
133
- ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
134
- │ │
135
- │ ✅ Rule extraction From entries, reviews, curated seeds │
136
- │ ✅ Confidence scoring Frequency + recency based │
137
- │ ✅ Reward logging Accept/reject/revision signals │
138
- │ ✅ Experiment tracking Sessions, mistakes, RMR calculation │
139
- │ ✅ Review gauntlet Curated persona-based code review │
140
- │ ⏳ Manual promotion Human selects rules to surface │
141
- │ │
142
- └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
143
- ```
144
-
145
- ### What's Coming (v0.8+)
146
-
147
- ```
148
- ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
149
- │ CONTEXTUAL BANDIT (PLANNED) │
150
- ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
151
- │ │
152
- │ Context (c): Error class, file type, task category │
153
- │ Arms (a): Candidate rules to surface │
154
- │ Reward (r): Human feedback (👍 helpful / 👎 not helpful) │
155
- │ │
156
- │ Policy π(c) → a: Thompson Sampling with Beta-Bernoulli │
157
- │ │
158
- │ Objective: Minimize regret = Σ(r* - r_chosen) │
159
- │ │
160
- └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
161
- ```
162
-
163
- **Arms** = learned rules (from buildlog entries, code reviews, explicit teaching)
164
-
165
- **Context** = what kind of problem you're working on
166
-
167
- **Reward** = did surfacing this rule actually help?
168
-
169
- The reward infrastructure exists. The bandit policy is next. Thompson Sampling will provide theoretical guarantees: O(√(KT log K)) regret bounds.
170
-
171
- We're building in public—the bandit implementation will be developed with full documentation of the process.
172
-
173
- ---
174
-
175
- ## The Pipeline
176
-
177
- buildlog captures signal at every stage:
178
-
179
- ```mermaid
180
- flowchart LR
181
- A["Work Sessions"] --> B["Structured Entries"]
182
- B --> C["Extracted Rules"]
183
- C --> D["Manual Promotion"]
184
- D --> E["Rule Surfaced"]
185
- E --> F["Human Feedback"]
186
- F --> G["Reward Logged"]
187
- G -.-> H["Bandit Policy"]
188
- H -.-> D
189
-
190
- style F fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
191
- style G fill:#4ecdc4,color:#fff
192
- style H fill:#666,color:#fff,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
193
- ```
194
-
195
- *Dashed: Coming in v0.8 — automatic rule selection via Thompson Sampling*
196
-
197
- ### Stage 1: Capture
198
- Document your work. Include the fuckups—they're the most valuable signal.
199
-
200
- ```bash
201
- buildlog new auth-api
202
- # Edit the markdown, document what happened
203
- ```
204
-
205
- ### Stage 2: Extract
206
- Pull structured rules from your entries.
207
-
208
- ```bash
209
- buildlog distill # Extract patterns
210
- buildlog skills # Deduplicate into rules
211
- ```
212
-
213
- ### Stage 3: Promote
214
- Surface rules to your agent via CLAUDE.md, settings.json, or Agent Skills.
215
-
216
- ```bash
217
- buildlog promote --target skill
218
- ```
219
-
220
- ### Stage 4: Measure
221
- Track what happens when rules are active.
222
-
223
- ```bash
224
- buildlog experiment start --error-class "type-errors"
225
- # ... work session ...
226
- buildlog experiment log-mistake --error-class "type-errors" \
227
- --description "Forgot to handle null case"
228
- buildlog experiment end
229
- buildlog experiment report
230
- ```
231
-
232
- ### Stage 5: Learn
233
- Log reward signals when rules help (or don't).
234
-
235
- ```python
236
- # Via MCP
237
- buildlog_log_reward(
238
- skill_id="arch-123",
239
- reward=1, # 1 = helped, 0 = didn't help
240
- context="type-errors",
241
- outcome="Caught the bug before commit"
242
- )
243
- ```
244
-
245
- ---
246
-
247
- ## Review Gauntlet
248
-
249
- Run your code through ruthless reviewer personas, each with curated rules from authoritative sources.
250
-
251
- ```bash
252
- # See available reviewers
253
- buildlog gauntlet list
254
-
255
- # Output:
256
- # Review Gauntlet Personas
257
- # ==================================================
258
- # security_karen
259
- # OWASP Top 10 security review
260
- # Rules: 13 (v1)
261
- #
262
- # test_terrorist
263
- # Comprehensive testing coverage audit
264
- # Rules: 21 (v1)
265
- #
266
- # Total: 2 personas, 34 rules
267
- ```
268
-
269
- ### Reviewer Personas
270
-
271
- | Persona | Focus | Rules |
272
- |---------|-------|-------|
273
- | **Security Karen** | OWASP Top 10, auth, injection, secrets | 13 |
274
- | **Test Terrorist** | Coverage, property-based, metamorphic, contracts | 21 |
275
- | **Ruthless Reviewer** | Code quality, FP principles | Coming soon |
276
-
277
- Each rule includes:
278
- - **Context**: When to apply it
279
- - **Antipattern**: What violation looks like
280
- - **Rationale**: Why it matters (with citations)
281
-
282
- ### Usage
283
-
284
- ```bash
285
- # Generate a review prompt
286
- buildlog gauntlet prompt src/api.py
287
-
288
- # Export rules for manual review
289
- buildlog gauntlet rules --format markdown -o review_checklist.md
290
-
291
- # After running a review, persist learnings
292
- buildlog gauntlet learn review_issues.json --source "PR#42"
293
- ```
294
-
295
- ### Gauntlet Loop (Agent Integration)
296
-
297
- For AI agents, the gauntlet loop automates the fix-rerun cycle:
298
-
299
- ```bash
300
- buildlog gauntlet loop src/ --persona security_karen --persona test_terrorist
301
- ```
302
-
303
- The loop provides structured checkpoints:
304
-
305
- | Severity | Action | Human Needed? |
306
- |----------|--------|---------------|
307
- | **Critical** | Agent fixes, reruns | No |
308
- | **Major** | Checkpoint: continue? | Yes |
309
- | **Minor** | Accept risk or fix? | Yes |
310
- | **Clean** | Done | No |
311
-
312
- MCP tools for agent integration:
313
- - `buildlog_gauntlet_issues` — Report findings, get next action
314
- - `buildlog_gauntlet_accept_risk` — Accept remaining issues (optionally create GitHub issues)
315
-
316
- The gauntlet integrates with the learning loop—issues found become rules that accumulate confidence.
317
-
318
- ---
319
-
320
- ## Experiment Infrastructure
321
-
322
- buildlog ships with infrastructure to run actual experiments:
323
-
324
- ```bash
325
- # Start a tracked session
326
- buildlog experiment start --error-class "api-design"
327
-
328
- # Log mistakes as they happen
329
- buildlog experiment log-mistake \
330
- --error-class "api-design" \
331
- --description "Returned 200 for error case"
332
-
333
- # End session
334
- buildlog experiment end
335
-
336
- # Get metrics
337
- buildlog experiment metrics
338
-
339
- # Full report across all sessions
340
- buildlog experiment report
341
- ```
342
-
343
- The report includes:
344
- - Total sessions, total mistakes
345
- - Repeat rate (RMR)
346
- - Mistakes by error class
347
- - Rules that correlate with corrections
348
-
349
- This is the data you need to make claims.
350
-
351
- ---
352
-
353
- ## Quick Start
354
-
355
- ```bash
356
- # Install
357
- pip install buildlog
358
-
359
- # Initialize
360
- buildlog init
361
-
362
- # Create your first entry
363
- buildlog new my-feature
364
-
365
- # After a few entries, extract rules
366
- buildlog distill
367
- buildlog skills
368
-
369
- # Start measuring
370
- buildlog experiment start
371
- # ... work ...
372
- buildlog experiment end
373
- buildlog experiment report
374
- ```
375
-
376
- ### MCP Server (Claude Code Integration)
377
-
378
- ```bash
379
- pip install buildlog[mcp]
380
- ```
381
-
382
- Add to `~/.claude/settings.json`:
383
-
384
- ```json
385
- {
386
- "mcpServers": {
387
- "buildlog": {
388
- "command": "buildlog-mcp"
389
- }
390
- }
391
- }
392
- ```
393
-
394
- Available tools:
395
- | Tool | Purpose |
396
- |------|---------|
397
- | `buildlog_status` | View rules by category and confidence |
398
- | `buildlog_promote` | Surface rules to agent |
399
- | `buildlog_reject` | Mark false positives |
400
- | `buildlog_diff` | Rules pending review |
401
- | `buildlog_learn_from_review` | Extract rules from code review |
402
- | `buildlog_log_reward` | Record reward signal |
403
- | `buildlog_start_session` | Begin tracked experiment |
404
- | `buildlog_log_mistake` | Record mistake during session |
405
- | `buildlog_experiment_report` | Full experiment report |
406
- | `buildlog_gauntlet_issues` | Report gauntlet findings, get next action |
407
- | `buildlog_gauntlet_accept_risk` | Accept remaining issues, optionally create GH issues |
408
-
409
- ### CLI Commands
410
-
411
- ```bash
412
- buildlog init # Initialize buildlog
413
- buildlog new <slug> # Create entry
414
- buildlog list # List entries
415
- buildlog distill # Extract patterns
416
- buildlog skills # Generate rules
417
- buildlog stats # Usage statistics
418
- buildlog reward <outcome> # Log reward signal
419
-
420
- # Experiments
421
- buildlog experiment start # Begin tracked session
422
- buildlog experiment log-mistake # Record mistake
423
- buildlog experiment end # End session
424
- buildlog experiment report # Full report
425
-
426
- # Review Gauntlet
427
- buildlog gauntlet list # Show reviewers
428
- buildlog gauntlet rules # Export rules
429
- buildlog gauntlet prompt <path> # Generate review prompt
430
- buildlog gauntlet learn <file> # Persist learnings
431
- buildlog gauntlet loop <path> # Auto-fix loop with HITL checkpoints
432
- ```
433
-
434
- ---
435
-
436
- ## What This Is Not
437
-
438
- **This is not AGI.** This is not "agents that truly learn." This is not a revolution.
439
-
440
- This is:
441
- - A structured way to capture engineering knowledge
442
- - A bandit framework for rule selection
443
- - Infrastructure to measure whether it works
444
-
445
- Boring? Maybe. But boring things that work beat exciting things that don't.
446
-
447
- ---
448
-
449
- ## The Falsification Protocol
450
-
451
- Want to test whether buildlog actually helps? Here's the protocol:
452
-
453
- 1. **Baseline**: Run N sessions without buildlog rules active. Log mistakes.
454
- 2. **Treatment**: Run N sessions with buildlog rules active. Log mistakes.
455
- 3. **Compare**: Calculate RMR for both conditions.
456
- 4. **Statistical test**: Two-proportion z-test or chi-squared.
457
- 5. **Report**: Effect size, confidence interval, p-value.
458
-
459
- If p > 0.05, we fail to reject the null. buildlog didn't help. That's a valid outcome.
460
-
461
- If p < 0.05, we have evidence of an effect. How big? Check the effect size.
462
-
463
- This is how you know. Not vibes. Data.
464
-
465
- ---
466
-
467
- ## Theoretical Foundations
468
-
469
- For the technically curious:
470
-
471
- | Concept | Application in buildlog | Status |
472
- |---------|------------------------|--------|
473
- | **Confidence scoring** | Frequency + recency decay | ✅ Implemented |
474
- | **Semantic hashing** | Mistake deduplication for RMR | ✅ Implemented |
475
- | **Reward signals** | Binary feedback infrastructure | ✅ Implemented |
476
- | **Thompson Sampling** | Rule selection under uncertainty | ⏳ Planned (v0.8) |
477
- | **Beta-Bernoulli model** | Posterior updates from binary reward | ⏳ Planned (v0.8) |
478
- | **Contextual bandits** | Context-dependent rule selection | ⏳ Planned (v0.8) |
479
- | **Regret bounds** | O(√(KT log K)) theoretical guarantee | ⏳ Planned (v0.8) |
480
-
481
- We're not inventing new math. We're applying proven frameworks to a new domain. The infrastructure for reward collection is live; the bandit policy is the next milestone.
482
-
483
- ---
484
-
485
- ## Honest Limitations
486
-
487
- ### Not Yet Implemented
488
-
489
- - **Automatic rule selection**: Currently manual promotion; Thompson Sampling bandit planned for v0.8
490
- - **Context-aware surfacing**: Rules are surfaced globally, not based on task context
491
-
492
- ### Hard Problems We're Working On
493
-
494
- - **Credit assignment**: When multiple rules are active, which one helped?
495
- - **Non-stationarity**: Developer skill changes over time
496
- - **Cold start**: New rules have high uncertainty
497
- - **Context representation**: What features actually matter?
498
-
499
- These are hard problems. We have directional ideas, not solutions. If you're a researcher working on bandit algorithms or causal inference, we'd love to talk.
500
-
501
- ---
502
-
503
- ## Philosophy
504
-
505
- 1. **Falsifiability over impressiveness** - If you can't prove it wrong, it's not a claim
506
- 2. **Measurement over intuition** - "Feels better" is not evidence
507
- 3. **Mechanisms over magic** - Explain how it works or admit you don't know
508
- 4. **Boring over exciting** - Proven frameworks beat novel demos
509
- 5. **Honesty over marketing** - State limitations. Invite scrutiny.
510
-
511
- ---
512
-
513
- ## Contributing
514
-
515
- We're especially interested in:
516
- - Better context representations for the bandit
517
- - Credit assignment approaches
518
- - Statistical methodology improvements
519
- - Real-world experiment results (positive or negative)
520
-
521
- ```bash
522
- git clone https://github.com/Peleke/buildlog-template
523
- cd buildlog-template
524
- pip install -e ".[dev]"
525
- pytest
526
- ```
527
-
528
- ---
529
-
530
- ## License
531
-
532
- MIT License — see [LICENSE](./LICENSE)
533
-
534
- ---
535
-
536
- <div align="center">
537
-
538
- **"Agent learning" without measurement is just prompt engineering with extra steps.**
539
-
540
- **buildlog is measurement.**
541
-
542
- [Back to top](#buildlog)
543
-
544
- </div>
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
1
- buildlog/__init__.py,sha256=FrgjyZhC19YyB40rOXHJWTA4xKWx2Yn2heIhVraaZ7A,90
2
- buildlog/cli.py,sha256=8Wxj3KqXd3u9ltv10BT0AOC233v1DMZ6qQAolVKxy_U,46543
3
- buildlog/confidence.py,sha256=EOkPxIH1_y7k6B3Hl7Wn0iR2qK_lumvOyyyqUdafXVY,9382
4
- buildlog/distill.py,sha256=fqXW_YyBFIFhwIWhnR-TQ7U65gypqG-mcAzNBr-qaag,11262
5
- buildlog/embeddings.py,sha256=vPydWjJVkYp172zFou-lJ737qsu6vRMQAMs143RGIpA,12364
6
- buildlog/seeds.py,sha256=L-lzO7rrDjMdVHcYKvEBm6scVDfCmFD0koiyafMZDLo,8596
7
- buildlog/skills.py,sha256=N1LZBCTf3KCjcZGm46r2L_XDlCKj1-vLUn_3YllNH-M,31142
8
- buildlog/stats.py,sha256=2WdHdmzUNGobtWngmm9nA_UmqM7DQeAnZL8_rLQN8aw,13256
9
- buildlog/core/__init__.py,sha256=_FTggRE6SVgtOFQ2ALlyCGkm8YmgyC33zxm0uUsqhro,1578
10
- buildlog/core/operations.py,sha256=gdRZUC7oecZhYpbqIgxF7k0gpSNv-GLHr9I5pjzzJsA,59842
11
- buildlog/data/__init__.py,sha256=47DEQpj8HBSa-_TImW-5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU,0
12
- buildlog/data/seeds/security_karen.yaml,sha256=Hjwp4j6FB-e0vCXp6AkyhAEkwASR4H1owdhPBID740E,8775
13
- buildlog/data/seeds/test_terrorist.yaml,sha256=-QY2x6d0LrlM6msMYaYwR43Wny9ZybQmU7pH_E7gSB0,11113
14
- buildlog/mcp/__init__.py,sha256=jCLNUkYFrDcPd5dY9xbaaVANl-ZzdPim1BykgGY7f7U,334
15
- buildlog/mcp/server.py,sha256=hZRqY8FHb8V7OZ4Yj0NNT-x6vqqbiDesjMBIVXfoshY,1231
16
- buildlog/mcp/tools.py,sha256=7Ov_wXoK5lcYpZ16_wzzudorhNgA4qfyB1CSLhDYiws,15915
17
- buildlog/render/__init__.py,sha256=VxJWEmcX7pSiC3W-ytsHv9gNVUr4hJrVHBW084kEnAI,1993
18
- buildlog/render/base.py,sha256=gQfvOsH1zttAo10xtEyNsAbqZ4NRSPiDihO-aiGgTsw,533
19
- buildlog/render/claude_md.py,sha256=NVD2YxW9bY1lr5m86ampevJ7B1sGjhdm-o_r2J7yFNQ,3163
20
- buildlog/render/settings_json.py,sha256=4DS5OWksPrFCa7MIgWIu0t4rxYmItpMdGfTqMX3aMNs,2495
21
- buildlog/render/skill.py,sha256=_7umIS1Ms1oQ2_PopYueFjX41nMq1p28yJp6DhXFdgU,5981
22
- buildlog/render/tracking.py,sha256=1y_Mf1s3KblV8TC0W9x2a_ynSJHLwkVZJcW1gs1a6q4,1786
23
- buildlog/seed_engine/__init__.py,sha256=f2LYSAs_D1bK4CW_pt54UEmy_SB1u1MOEJlKqM7_R7E,1869
24
- buildlog/seed_engine/categorizers.py,sha256=uzatJQPG4Vf7z7ZAeyQbL-bVJ8cUKBHG-3U93-BFIRQ,4649
25
- buildlog/seed_engine/extractors.py,sha256=rkztg62LzFH018ob5Tl1eFp_yfPo8syn3Ib4h6bAyK4,4824
26
- buildlog/seed_engine/generators.py,sha256=T3N3uHg359xSBypIGmvVWYI0Qh8WLlGIFQWX0_gs0I4,4358
27
- buildlog/seed_engine/models.py,sha256=qESSuoF3CJy8pp96E3Vmb38V-snzeaW0Xg0RfbH8v1U,3418
28
- buildlog/seed_engine/pipeline.py,sha256=wLdcjyA_B4wFEb2iKwRCUGkX-oaVu9OXIcmLcEsJN6s,6527
29
- buildlog/seed_engine/sources.py,sha256=8j9oUFZCSKMr5VpIuAxTPY3wTzfTEmw6M_41_aismiE,11184
30
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/copier.yml,sha256=A-1JKV59kOe0BQosGUBgRCg7iQozP_qyA3zfoHwpBKY,927
31
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/post_gen.py,sha256=XFlo40LuPpAsBhIRRRtHqvU3_5POss4L401hp35ijhw,1744
32
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/.gitkeep,sha256=47DEQpj8HBSa-_TImW-5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU,0
33
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/2026-01-01-example.md,sha256=7x9sKmydfmfKyNz9hV7MtYnQJuBwbxNanbPOcpQDDZQ,7040
34
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/BUILDLOG_SYSTEM.md,sha256=osclytWwl5jUiTgSpuT4cT3h3oPvCkZ5GPCnFuJZNcY,3802
35
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/_TEMPLATE.md,sha256=CUvxgcx1-9XT_EdQ8e_vnuPq_h-u1uhXJgForJU2Pso,2932
36
- buildlog-0.7.0.data/data/share/buildlog/template/buildlog/assets/.gitkeep,sha256=47DEQpj8HBSa-_TImW-5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU,0
37
- buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=R_xu6usTJmn2lWctDZnTEa-pDz2qqCvB_U-xNZ9V_Pw,18076
38
- buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=WLgqFyCfm_KASv4WHyYy0P3pM_m7J5L9k2skdKLirC8,87
39
- buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/entry_points.txt,sha256=BMFclPOomp_sgaa0OqBg6LfqCMlqzjZV88ww5TrPPoo,87
40
- buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE,sha256=fAgt-akug9nAwIj6M-SIf8u3ck-T7pJTwfmy9vWYASk,1074
41
- buildlog-0.7.0.dist-info/RECORD,,