agentcheckup 0.4.0__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
1
+ """Input schema rules.
2
+
3
+ The schema is the contract. A loose contract does not fail loudly - it produces
4
+ a plausible-looking wrong call, which is far more expensive to debug.
5
+ """
6
+
7
+ from __future__ import annotations
8
+
9
+ from ..models import Finding, Severity, Tool
10
+ from .base import tool_rule
11
+
12
+ #: Verbs that imply unbounded input size.
13
+ UNBOUNDED_HINTS = ("query", "sql", "text", "content", "body", "data", "html", "code")
14
+
15
+
16
+ @tool_rule("AGT020", Severity.ERROR, "inputSchema is not an object schema")
17
+ def schema_not_object(tool: Tool):
18
+ """MCP requires ``{"type": "object", ...}``.
19
+
20
+ Providers that emit ``{"type": "array"}`` or omit ``type`` break client-side
21
+ validation in strict implementations.
22
+ """
23
+ schema = tool.input_schema
24
+ if not schema:
25
+ return Finding(
26
+ rule="AGT020",
27
+ severity=Severity.ERROR,
28
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} has no inputSchema.",
29
+ tool=tool.name,
30
+ hint='Use {"type": "object", "properties": {}} for a no-argument tool.',
31
+ )
32
+ if schema.get("type") != "object":
33
+ return Finding(
34
+ rule="AGT020",
35
+ severity=Severity.ERROR,
36
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} inputSchema type is {schema.get('type')!r}, expected 'object'.",
37
+ tool=tool.name,
38
+ hint="MCP tool arguments are always a JSON object.",
39
+ )
40
+ return None
41
+
42
+
43
+ @tool_rule("AGT021", Severity.WARNING, "Required references an undeclared property")
44
+ def required_unknown(tool: Tool):
45
+ """A dangling ``required`` entry makes every call fail validation client-side."""
46
+ props = tool.properties()
47
+ unknown = [r for r in tool.required() if r not in props]
48
+ if unknown:
49
+ return Finding(
50
+ rule="AGT021",
51
+ severity=Severity.WARNING,
52
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} requires undeclared property/properties: {', '.join(unknown)}.",
53
+ tool=tool.name,
54
+ hint="Every name in `required` must exist under `properties`.",
55
+ )
56
+ return None
57
+
58
+
59
+ @tool_rule("AGT022", Severity.INFO, "Schema allows undeclared properties")
60
+ def additional_properties_open(tool: Tool):
61
+ """Models happily invent extra keys when the schema permits it.
62
+
63
+ ``additionalProperties: false`` turns a silent wrong-argument bug into a
64
+ visible validation error.
65
+ """
66
+ if tool.input_schema and tool.input_schema.get("additionalProperties") is not False:
67
+ return Finding(
68
+ rule="AGT022",
69
+ severity=Severity.INFO,
70
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} schema does not set additionalProperties: false.",
71
+ tool=tool.name,
72
+ hint="Closing the schema stops the model from inventing extra keys.",
73
+ )
74
+ return None
75
+
76
+
77
+ @tool_rule("AGT023", Severity.INFO, "Parameter has no enum or format constraint")
78
+ def unconstrained_string(tool: Tool):
79
+ """Free-form strings are the main source of retry loops.
80
+
81
+ A ``format`` (date-time, uri, email) or an ``enum`` costs one line and
82
+ removes an entire failure class.
83
+ """
84
+ offenders: list[str] = []
85
+ for name, spec in tool.properties().items():
86
+ if not isinstance(spec, dict):
87
+ continue
88
+ if spec.get("type") != "string":
89
+ continue
90
+ if not any(k in spec for k in ("enum", "format", "pattern", "const")):
91
+ offenders.append(name)
92
+ if offenders:
93
+ preview = ", ".join(sorted(offenders)[:5])
94
+ more = "" if len(offenders) <= 5 else f" (+{len(offenders) - 5} more)"
95
+ return Finding(
96
+ rule="AGT023",
97
+ severity=Severity.INFO,
98
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} has unconstrained string param(s): {preview}{more}.",
99
+ tool=tool.name,
100
+ hint="Add `enum`, `format` or `pattern` where the value space is finite.",
101
+ )
102
+ return None
103
+
104
+
105
+ @tool_rule("AGT024", Severity.INFO, "Array parameter has no size bound")
106
+ def unbounded_array(tool: Tool):
107
+ """Without ``maxItems`` a single call can blow the context window."""
108
+ offenders = [
109
+ name
110
+ for name, spec in tool.properties().items()
111
+ if isinstance(spec, dict)
112
+ and spec.get("type") == "array"
113
+ and "maxItems" not in spec
114
+ ]
115
+ if offenders:
116
+ return Finding(
117
+ rule="AGT024",
118
+ severity=Severity.INFO,
119
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} array param(s) without maxItems: {', '.join(sorted(offenders)[:5])}.",
120
+ tool=tool.name,
121
+ hint="Set `maxItems` and document the cap in the description.",
122
+ )
123
+ return None
124
+
125
+
126
+ @tool_rule("AGT025", Severity.WARNING, "Parameter name is ambiguous")
127
+ def ambiguous_param_name(tool: Tool):
128
+ """`data`, `value`, `arg`, `input`, `options` tell the model nothing.
129
+
130
+ The model has to infer the expected shape from the type alone, which is
131
+ exactly where hallucinated payloads come from.
132
+ """
133
+ vague = {"data", "value", "arg", "args", "input", "param", "options", "obj", "thing"}
134
+ hits = [n for n in tool.properties() if n.lower() in vague]
135
+ if hits:
136
+ return Finding(
137
+ rule="AGT025",
138
+ severity=Severity.WARNING,
139
+ message=f"Tool {tool.name!r} has ambiguous param name(s): {', '.join(sorted(hits))}.",
140
+ tool=tool.name,
141
+ hint="Name the payload for what it is: `markdown_body`, `filter_expression`.",
142
+ )
143
+ return None
agentcheckup/tokens.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
1
+ """Rough token estimation with no tokenizer dependency.
2
+
3
+ Why not tiktoken: it ships native wheels per platform and pulls a network
4
+ download at first use. For a linter that runs in CI on arbitrary machines that
5
+ is a bad trade. The heuristic below is intentionally conservative and is
6
+ documented as an estimate everywhere it surfaces.
7
+
8
+ Calibration: OpenAI's cl100k / o200k families average ~4 characters per token
9
+ for English prose and ~1 token per CJK character. JSON punctuation is denser
10
+ than prose, so we apply a slight structural discount.
11
+ """
12
+
13
+ from __future__ import annotations
14
+
15
+ import json
16
+ import unicodedata
17
+ from typing import Any
18
+
19
+ _CJK_RANGES = (
20
+ (0x3040, 0x30FF), # kana
21
+ (0x3400, 0x4DBF), # CJK ext A
22
+ (0x4E00, 0x9FFF), # CJK unified
23
+ (0xAC00, 0xD7AF), # hangul
24
+ (0xF900, 0xFAFF), # CJK compat
25
+ (0xFF00, 0xFFEF), # fullwidth forms
26
+ )
27
+
28
+
29
+ def _is_cjk(ch: str) -> bool:
30
+ cp = ord(ch)
31
+ return any(lo <= cp <= hi for lo, hi in _CJK_RANGES)
32
+
33
+
34
+ def estimate_tokens(text: str) -> int:
35
+ """Estimate token count for a string."""
36
+ if not text:
37
+ return 0
38
+ cjk = 0
39
+ other = 0
40
+ for ch in text:
41
+ if _is_cjk(ch):
42
+ cjk += 1
43
+ else:
44
+ other += 1
45
+ return cjk + max(1, round(other / 4)) if other else cjk
46
+
47
+
48
+ def estimate_json_tokens(payload: Any) -> int:
49
+ """Estimate tokens for a JSON-serialisable structure."""
50
+ dumped = json.dumps(payload, ensure_ascii=False, separators=(",", ":"))
51
+ return estimate_tokens(dumped)
52
+
53
+
54
+ def manifest_tokens(tools: list[Any]) -> int:
55
+ """Estimate how many tokens the whole tool manifest costs in context.
56
+
57
+ This is the number an agent pays on *every* request, so it matters more
58
+ than any single description.
59
+ """
60
+ return estimate_json_tokens([t.raw if hasattr(t, "raw") else t for t in tools])
61
+
62
+
63
+ def has_invisible_chars(text: str) -> list[str]:
64
+ """Return code points of characters that hide text from human review."""
65
+ suspects: list[str] = []
66
+ for ch in text:
67
+ if ch in ("\u200b", "\u200c", "\u200d", "\u2060", "\ufeff") or unicodedata.category(ch) == "Cf":
68
+ suspects.append(f"U+{ord(ch):04X}")
69
+ return sorted(set(suspects))
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
1
+ Metadata-Version: 2.5
2
+ Name: agentcheckup
3
+ Version: 0.4.0
4
+ Summary: Diagnose your agent setup: tool conflicts, risky config, context budget.
5
+ Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/wanjiaqing/agentcheckup
6
+ Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/wanjiaqing/agentcheckup/issues
7
+ Project-URL: Changelog, https://github.com/wanjiaqing/agentcheckup/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
8
+ Author: wanjiaqing
9
+ License: MIT
10
+ License-File: LICENSE
11
+ Keywords: agents,ai,cli,linter,mcp,model-context-protocol,security
12
+ Classifier: Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
13
+ Classifier: Environment :: Console
14
+ Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
15
+ Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
16
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
17
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
18
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
19
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
20
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
21
+ Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance
22
+ Classifier: Typing :: Typed
23
+ Requires-Python: >=3.10
24
+ Provides-Extra: dev
25
+ Requires-Dist: pytest>=8; extra == 'dev'
26
+ Requires-Dist: ruff>=0.6; extra == 'dev'
27
+ Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
28
+
29
+ # agentcheckup
30
+
31
+ > Diagnose your agent setup before your agent does.
32
+
33
+ [![CI](https://github.com/wanjiaqing/agentcheckup/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/wanjiaqing/agentcheckup/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
34
+ [![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/agentcheckup.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/agentcheckup/)
35
+ [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/agentcheckup.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/agentcheckup/)
36
+ [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg)](LICENSE)
37
+
38
+ Every other MCP tool looks at **one server**. None of them look at what happens
39
+ when you load five.
40
+
41
+ ```console
42
+ $ agentcheckup
43
+
44
+ agentcheckup 0.4.0 | 3 server(s) | 4 tool(s) | ~442 tokens per request
45
+
46
+ Grade C Score 79/100 1 error 2 warning 1 info
47
+
48
+ CONFLICTS (1)
49
+ AGT201 Tool name 'read_file' is exposed by both 'files' and 'git'.
50
+ [files/read_file <-> git/read_file]
51
+ fix: Hard collision: the client keeps one and the other is
52
+ unreachable. Rename one, or use a gateway that prefixes.
53
+
54
+ RISKS (2)
55
+ AGT101 Server 'github' runs unpinned npx package
56
+ '@modelcontextprotocol/server-github'.
57
+ AGT107 Server 'github' stores credential(s) inline:
58
+ GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN.
59
+
60
+ NUDGES (1 across 1 rule(s), no score impact)
61
+ AGT105 Server did not return a tool list (1)
62
+ github
63
+ ```
64
+
65
+ ## The problem nobody is testing for
66
+
67
+ Two servers cannot see each other. Your model can. It gets a flat list of 47
68
+ tools from five servers and picks by description similarity — with no way to know
69
+ that `files.read_file` and `git.read_file` are different things.
70
+
71
+ Three failure modes follow, and no existing tool catches them:
72
+
73
+ **1. Hard collision.** Two servers expose the same tool name. The client keeps
74
+ one, the other is silently unreachable. You spend an afternoon debugging "why
75
+ won't it read the file" when the answer is "it's calling the other one".
76
+
77
+ **2. Soft collision.** `github.search` and `docs.search` with 70% overlapping
78
+ descriptions. Selection becomes a coin flip that looks exactly like model
79
+ flakiness. It isn't — it's your manifest.
80
+
81
+ **3. Context tax.** An agent pays for the full tool manifest on **every** request.
82
+ 47 tools with 200-character descriptions is thousands of tokens before the user
83
+ says anything. Nobody budgets for it because nobody measures it.
84
+
85
+ `agentcheckup` measures all three, in one command, from the configs you already
86
+ have.
87
+
88
+ ## What it checks
89
+
90
+ | Layer | Question it answers | Rules |
91
+ |---|---|---|
92
+ | **Conflicts** | Will my agent pick the wrong tool? | AGT201–AGT203 |
93
+ | **Risks** | Is my setup unsafe? | AGT001–AGT107 |
94
+ | **Budget** | What does my manifest cost per request? | reported on every run |
95
+
96
+ 36 rules in total. Full reference: [docs/rules.md](docs/rules.md).
97
+
98
+ ## Install
99
+
100
+ ```bash
101
+ pip install agentcheckup
102
+ # or run without installing
103
+ uvx agentcheckup
104
+ ```
105
+
106
+ Python 3.10+. **Zero runtime dependencies** — no SDK, no tokenizer, no embeddings,
107
+ no network calls. It reads JSON, starts processes, prints text.
108
+
109
+ ## Usage
110
+
111
+ ### One command, no arguments
112
+
113
+ ```bash
114
+ agentcheckup
115
+ ```
116
+
117
+ Finds your configs automatically — 27 known locations across Claude Desktop,
118
+ Claude Code (including its per-project `mcpServers`), Cursor, VS Code, Cline,
119
+ Roo Code, Kilo Code, Windsurf, Zed, Codex CLI and Continue, plus project-local
120
+ `.mcp.json` / `.cursor/mcp.json` / `.vscode/mcp.json` — starts each server,
121
+ collects its tools, and reports.
122
+
123
+ Servers that fail to start are reported as `AGT105` and skipped, not fatal. A
124
+ broken server should not stop you auditing the other four.
125
+
126
+ ### Common flags
127
+
128
+ ```bash
129
+ agentcheckup --no-spawn # configs only, no processes started
130
+ agentcheckup --config path.json # add a config the discovery missed
131
+ agentcheckup --no-discover # audit only what you passed with --config
132
+ agentcheckup --timeout 40 # slow server? give it longer
133
+ agentcheckup --format json # machine-readable
134
+ agentcheckup --fail-on warning # CI gate
135
+ ```
136
+
137
+ ### One server at a time
138
+
139
+ ```bash
140
+ agentcheckup scan tools.json # {"tools": [...]}, {"result": {...}} or a log
141
+ agentcheckup scan --cmd "python my_server.py" # live stdio handshake
142
+ agentcheckup config ~/.claude.json # config rules only
143
+ agentcheckup rules # list every rule
144
+ ```
145
+
146
+ ### As a GitHub Action
147
+
148
+ The fastest way to keep a manifest from regressing, and the version you pin is
149
+ the version you run — the action installs from its own checkout.
150
+
151
+ ```yaml
152
+ - uses: wanjiaqing/agentcheckup@v0.3.0
153
+ with:
154
+ config: .mcp.json
155
+ fail-on: warning
156
+ ```
157
+
158
+ Full reference, including SARIF upload and score gates: [docs/github-action.md](docs/github-action.md).
159
+
160
+ ### Raw CLI in CI
161
+
162
+ ```yaml
163
+ - name: Diagnose agent setup
164
+ run: |
165
+ pip install agentcheckup
166
+ agentcheckup --no-spawn --fail-on warning
167
+ ```
168
+
169
+ For GitHub code scanning, emit SARIF:
170
+
171
+ ```yaml
172
+ - run: agentcheckup --format sarif --fail-on never > agentcheckup.sarif
173
+ - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v4
174
+ with:
175
+ sarif_file: agentcheckup.sarif
176
+ ```
177
+
178
+ One run can produce all three outputs:
179
+
180
+ ```bash
181
+ agentcheckup --format text --json-out report.json --sarif-out report.sarif
182
+ ```
183
+
184
+ Exit codes: `0` clean, `1` findings at or above `--fail-on`, `2` usage/load error.
185
+
186
+ ## How conflicts are detected
187
+
188
+ No embeddings, no model, no network — because a linter that needs a 200MB wheel
189
+ is a linter that stops running on a plane.
190
+
191
+ Each tool pair across servers is scored on two signals:
192
+
193
+ - **name overlap** — normalised token Jaccard (`read_files` ≡ `read_file`)
194
+ - **description overlap** — token Jaccard over stopword-stripped, plural-stemmed words
195
+
196
+ A pair is flagged when the descriptions overlap ≥ 65% **and** the names share a
197
+ head noun, or when the blended score clears 0.55. The shared-noun requirement is
198
+ what keeps `search_repositories` and `search_documents` apart — without it the
199
+ false-positive rate made the report untrustworthy, which is worse than no report.
200
+
201
+ It is a heuristic, and the docs say so. `AGT203` is a warning, not a verdict.
202
+
203
+ ## How the score works
204
+
205
+ Most linters fail here: a rule that fires on 18 of 18 tools is a *preference*,
206
+ not a defect, and charging one point each scores the official MCP servers 0/100.
207
+ That number is useless, so the model is calibrated instead of invented:
208
+
209
+ | Severity | Cost | Why |
210
+ |---|---|---|
211
+ | `error` | 10 | breaks a run, or endangers the host |
212
+ | `warning` | 3 | likely to cause wrong behaviour |
213
+ | `info` | 1, **capped at 10 total** | a human should decide |
214
+
215
+ Budget is **20 points per tool**, so a 200-tool manifest is not punished for
216
+ being large, and a 4-tool manifest with one hard collision is not let off easy.
217
+
218
+ Calibration against four real inputs:
219
+
220
+ | Input | Tools | Result |
221
+ |---|---|---|
222
+ | Clean fixture | 2 | A · 100 |
223
+ | Official `fetch` + `git` + `time` servers | 18 | B · 87 |
224
+ | Hard collision + unpinned package + plaintext token | 4 | C · 79 |
225
+ | Deliberately broken fixture | 7 | F · 36 |
226
+
227
+ Repeated findings are collapsed: 12 tools missing parameter descriptions print
228
+ as one line naming all twelve, and info findings are summarised one line per
229
+ rule. A report nobody can read is a report nobody acts on.
230
+
231
+ ## Design principles
232
+
233
+ - **Zero runtime dependencies.** A diagnostic that breaks because a transitive
234
+ dep broke is worse than no diagnostic.
235
+ - **Stable rule IDs.** `AGT201` never changes meaning. Suppressions and CI
236
+ thresholds keep working across releases.
237
+ - **Every finding has a fix.** A rule that only says "this is bad" trains people
238
+ to ignore the output.
239
+ - **Degrade, don't die.** A server that will not start is one finding, not an
240
+ aborted run.
241
+ - **No network calls, ever.** Your config never leaves the machine. This is the
242
+ one thing a commercial scanner structurally cannot promise.
243
+ - **Heuristics are labelled as heuristics.** `info` means "a human should
244
+ decide". The score is a conversation starter, not a certification.
245
+
246
+ ## What this is not
247
+
248
+ - Not a sandbox. It tells you the manifest looks risky; it cannot stop the server.
249
+ - Not a runtime guard. Nothing here runs during an agent session.
250
+ - Not an MCP protocol validator. It checks quality and safety, not conformance —
251
+ the official `modelcontextprotocol/conformance` suite does that.
252
+
253
+ ## Contributing
254
+
255
+ Adding a rule takes about ten minutes and one small file — see
256
+ [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md). Rules and client adapters are the whole point
257
+ of this project, so those PRs are the most welcome kind.
258
+
259
+ ## License
260
+
261
+ MIT
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
1
+ agentcheckup/__init__.py,sha256=7I4aeGtWdYsj3cMwvyxRw6oBYNaUqE2ej7LrGOdwqs0,664
2
+ agentcheckup/__main__.py,sha256=UP0yjf5bUzmplYRElA6c5FuXZNu3sTDMJfOpZsy3Bqg,115
3
+ agentcheckup/cli.py,sha256=e-gEeRx3uu4IXCs64-MaCP7vVfqwgXcNAmJk9PCTolU,8322
4
+ agentcheckup/conflicts.py,sha256=60Q4r5NV1O6Bh-JDAkiNXj2RhNBDhIb8HWeJD9-_BTA,8683
5
+ agentcheckup/discovery.py,sha256=S6kz4FndIydQYcW-Ttyfer8nhidD_NRX3fmw2DokEew,6906
6
+ agentcheckup/engine.py,sha256=MzppSFmp4REQ4jMZYlTrula7eYjNcX8hYQvGI-6NvEk,4625
7
+ agentcheckup/loader.py,sha256=zVxkyWdW9sW1aP9EMSKRKhnLAKb-v3kEqYlxZMuQ3ts,7584
8
+ agentcheckup/models.py,sha256=YzaDPYKTwXPqVtAnSZSp_cAaGLIwKouM_P__R9ZIJZU,5066
9
+ agentcheckup/report.py,sha256=vykhYz_oVQwScRXk-95Ae51jtKON-ZdpuGFmW7BDPd8,9733
10
+ agentcheckup/tokens.py,sha256=BEAWi0iF4CP2BQRjGO3ozIiauMUosJ-OYBu0807wFkE,2190
11
+ agentcheckup/rules/__init__.py,sha256=9N49niQgWcrVUWhrqnDS2KTI8y7T0LwYf7QXdUMlLlE,371
12
+ agentcheckup/rules/base.py,sha256=i3lZ6EutpHKTTlunHeEQ6uV1AefRTMsM6yPBpameAZw,2567
13
+ agentcheckup/rules/config_rules.py,sha256=wpvh6_Exd2srAWr13hnZGTlrtRTBz5wwfpOE_TCVE3g,6537
14
+ agentcheckup/rules/docs.py,sha256=g1cVvz99y87nNYd_qWtsfHZpwELohAf-VXEOCyhR0zI,4434
15
+ agentcheckup/rules/injection.py,sha256=pRvDDff2zZAWeHE1NTh1zmMM36bTI8a9pgnoAJcZuow,5330
16
+ agentcheckup/rules/naming.py,sha256=c9bPgbqmojNVYo1jR7AQ8w9ns0spox6fWt-eBB-qg0Y,3315
17
+ agentcheckup/rules/safety.py,sha256=PTodMfCSvIAkDdqAMQc-Y_ZVxVm1JwxxRzQjCOCW83E,4947
18
+ agentcheckup/rules/schema.py,sha256=b3Ft-DxbKPMJA1eVQwmQ8B5O7I5DqaM0UDRDp1Rn2ks,5374
19
+ agentcheckup-0.4.0.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=VDSo_e-pv-ps7U4QQ-gf0lII75XtA5JyECcvqw0swiU,9702
20
+ agentcheckup-0.4.0.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=2iZrJkDIkeDh0k9SikKMqFuRP-ua6mb4Ir1AsER4BEw,87
21
+ agentcheckup-0.4.0.dist-info/entry_points.txt,sha256=OlI4_uXpibTwRdGpYauao_fpFZ0ddNXq-jnMgROTiHY,55
22
+ agentcheckup-0.4.0.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE,sha256=wPwTNSFI27eV7y5LmMjg1J2GZaOVrpyC5AQB1-6H46o,1067
23
+ agentcheckup-0.4.0.dist-info/RECORD,,
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ Wheel-Version: 1.0
2
+ Generator: hatchling 1.33.0
3
+ Root-Is-Purelib: true
4
+ Tag: py3-none-any
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
1
+ [console_scripts]
2
+ agentcheckup = agentcheckup.cli:main
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
1
+ MIT License
2
+
3
+ Copyright (c) 2026 wanjiaqing
4
+
5
+ Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
6
+ of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
7
+ in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
8
+ to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
9
+ copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
10
+ furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
11
+
12
+ The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
13
+ copies or substantial portions of the Software.
14
+
15
+ THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
16
+ IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
17
+ FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
18
+ AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
19
+ LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
20
+ OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
21
+ SOFTWARE.