npm - zero-slop - Versions diffs - 2.12.1 → 2.12.4 - Mend

zero-slop 2.12.1 → 2.12.4

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (6) hide show

package/README.md CHANGED Viewed

@@ -1,46 +1,19 @@
-<p align="center">
-  <a href="https://zero-slop.ai">
-    <picture>
-      <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="assets/logo/zero-slop-logo-reversed.svg">
-      <img src="assets/logo/zero-slop-logo-primary.svg" width="360" alt="Zero Slop">
-    </picture>
-  </a>
-</p>
-      Zero Slop is installed about 1,600 times a week on npm.
-<p align="center"><strong>Find AI-sounding tells and slop in your writing.</strong></p>
-<p align="center">
-  Zero Slop finds slop- stock phrasing, mechanical rhythm, vague claims, and canned formatting in writing.<br>
-  Your existing AI assistant edits the draft; local checks guard its names, numbers, links, quotations, code, tables, and paths.
-</p>
-<p align="center">
-  <a href="https://zero-slop.ai/try/"><strong>Try it in your browser</strong></a>
-  ·
-  <a href="#install">Install the skill</a>
-  ·
-  <a href="#evidence-and-limits">See the evidence</a>
-  ·
-  <a href="https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/releases/latest">Latest release</a>
-  ·
-  <a href="https://zero-slop.ai/brand/">Brand assets</a>
-</p>
-<p align="center">
-  <a href="https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/actions/workflows/validate.yml"><img alt="Validate" src="https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/actions/workflows/validate.yml/badge.svg"></a>
-  <img alt="Version 2.12.1" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/version-2.12.1-72528F?color=C15732">
-  <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/zero-slop"><img alt="npm version" src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/zero-slop?color=C15732"></a>
-  <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/zero-slop"><img alt="npm downloads" src="https://img.shields.io/npm/dm/zero-slop?color=17634F"></a>
-  <a href="https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/stargazers"><img alt="GitHub stars" src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/manavmishra/ZeroSlop?style=flat&color=C15732"></a>
-  <a href="LICENSE"><img alt="MIT license" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-141412"></a>
-  <a href="https://hol.org/registry/plugins/manav-mishra%2Fzero-slop"><img alt="Listed in the HOL plugin registry" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/HOL%20registry-listed-2C6E8F"></a>
-</p>
+<picture>
+  <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="assets/logo/zero-slop-logo-reversed.svg">
+  <img src="assets/logo/zero-slop-logo-primary.svg" width="180" alt="Zero Slop">
+</picture>
-```sh
-npx skills add manavmishra/ZeroSlop --global
-```
+# Zero Slop
+Find the canned phrases in an AI-assisted draft, then edit them without losing what you meant to say.
+Zero Slop is a free, open-source agent skill. Your AI assistant reads and edits the writing; local tools score the result and check names, numbers, links, quotations, code, tables, and paths against the original. [Try it in your browser](https://zero-slop.ai/try/) or [install the skill](#quick-start).
+<img alt="Version 2.12.4" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/version-2.12.4-72528F?color=C15732">
+## Problem
+AI can give you a grammatically clean draft that still sounds like everybody else's: the same opening, the same tidy contrasts, the same closing thought. Asking for a rewrite can make things worse if the assistant quietly changes a number or smooths away your point. Zero Slop gives it an editing brief and checks the details afterward. A writing score helps you spot familiar patterns, but it cannot tell who wrote the text.
 <a href="assets/zero-slop-demo.mp4?v=dark-shell-restored-20260906">
   <picture>
@@ -50,18 +23,16 @@ npx skills add manavmishra/ZeroSlop --global
   </picture>
 </a>
+## See an edit
-## Before and after
-A launch post, as AI wrote it:
+Here is a short launch draft:
 > We're thrilled to announce that our team has leveraged cutting-edge machine learning to deliver a seamless onboarding experience, reducing setup time by 40%.
-The scorer rates that draft 99.3/100 and flags four phrases: “We're thrilled
+The local scorer gives it 99.3/100. Lower is better. It flags “We're thrilled
 to,” “leveraged,” “cutting-edge,” and “seamless.”
-The rewrite, limited to the draft's stated claims:
+An edit that keeps the stated result:
 > We used machine learning to reduce onboarding setup time by 40%.
@@ -70,71 +41,61 @@ Writing score: 9.5/100  [clear]
   Flagged phrases : 0 across 10 words
 ```
-The rewrite retains the draft's stated result. See four complete, reproducible pairs in [`examples/`](examples/).
-Use it for launch posts, changelogs, emails, research summaries, or batch checks.
-Scores describe writing patterns, not authorship.
+The result still claims a 40% reduction in setup time. See four complete pairs in [`examples/`](examples/).
-## Install
+Use it on launch posts, changelogs, emails, or research summaries. You can score drafts without editing.
-[Try the free browser editor](https://zero-slop.ai/try/), or install:
+## Quick start
-| Environment | Fastest route |
-|---|---|
-| Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Warp, Zed | `npx skills add manavmishra/ZeroSlop --global` |
-| Gemini CLI | `gemini extensions install https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop --auto-update` |
-| Claude Code plugin | `/plugin marketplace add manavmishra/ZeroSlop`, then `/plugin install zero-slop@zero-slop` |
-| Any assistant with file uploads | Download the [single-file bundle](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/releases/latest/download/zero-slop-single-file.md) |
-| Claude.ai | Upload the [latest skill ZIP](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/releases/latest/download/zero-slop.zip) |
-| ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, Cursor, or another MCP client | Connect the optional [hosted MCP server](mcp/README.md) |
+Install it in an assistant that supports skills:
-Ask your assistant to edit:
+```sh
+npx skills add manavmishra/ZeroSlop --global
+```
 ```text
 /zero-slop (your writing)
 ```
-Inspect without editing:
+To find problems without rewriting, use `/zero-slop inspect (your writing)`. You can also [try the browser editor](https://zero-slop.ai/try/) before installing anything.
-```text
-/zero-slop inspect (your writing)
-```
+### Other ways to install
-Score locally:
+The `npx skills add` command works with Claude Code and Codex; [other compatible clients](DISTRIBUTION.md) have install notes. Gemini CLI users can run `gemini extensions install https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop --auto-update`. For Claude.ai, upload the [skill ZIP](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/releases/latest/download/zero-slop.zip); for file-upload assistants, use the [single-file bundle](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/releases/latest/download/zero-slop-single-file.md).
+For a local score without a model call:
 ```sh
 npx zero-slop score draft.md
 ```
-From a cloned checkout, gate a folder:
+From a cloned checkout, check a folder against the review threshold of 25:
 ```sh
 python3 scripts/slopscore.py --batch drafts/ --gate 25
 ```
-Installed checks run locally. Skill editing follows your assistant's privacy settings; [MCP editing is remote](mcp/README.md).
+Installed checks run locally; editing through the skill follows your assistant's privacy settings. The [hosted MCP service](mcp/README.md) and browser editor process drafts remotely with Workers AI.
-### Hosted MCP
+For an MCP client, use this endpoint:
 ```text
 https://mcp.zero-slop.ai/mcp
 ```
-[Connection options and listing status](DISTRIBUTION.md).
+The MCP connection options are in [`mcp/README.md`](mcp/README.md).
-## CLI
+## Edit from the command line
-Edit a file through MCP:
+The CLI sends a file to the hosted editor without changing the file on disk:
 ```sh
-npx --yes zero-slop@2.12.1 deslop draft.md --genre professional
+npx --yes zero-slop@2.12.4 deslop draft.md --genre professional
 ```
-Use `-` for stdin and `--json` for structured output. `--require-approved` exits nonzero
-when review is needed; the result is still printed. Files stay unchanged. Node.js 22+;
-offline `score` also needs Python 3. [CLI reference and privacy](docs/cli.md).
+Use `-` for stdin and `--json` for structured output. `--require-approved` prints the result but exits nonzero when review is needed. Requires Node.js 22+; offline `score` also needs Python 3. [CLI options and privacy](docs/cli.md).
-## REST API
+## Call the REST API
 ```sh
 curl --fail-with-body --max-time 75 https://mcp.zero-slop.ai/v1/deslop \
@@ -142,50 +103,34 @@ curl --fail-with-body --max-time 75 https://mcp.zero-slop.ai/v1/deslop \
   --data '{"text":"Maya owns the pricing review.","genre":"professional"}'
 ```
-Same pipeline and result as MCP. Check `status` before using the edit. Free, shared
-capacity; up to 20,000 Unicode code points per draft after trimming. Hosted CLI
-editing and REST process drafts remotely without storing them.
-[API reference](docs/rest-api.md) · [OpenAPI contract](https://mcp.zero-slop.ai/openapi.json)
+REST returns the same result as MCP. Check `status` before using an edit. Shared free capacity accepts up to 20,000 Unicode code points after trimming. [API reference](docs/rest-api.md) · [OpenAPI contract](https://mcp.zero-slop.ai/openapi.json)
-## What the workflow adds
+## What it does
-| A prompt alone | Zero Slop |
-|---|---|
-| “Make this sound human” leaves the target vague. | A 0–100 meter points to exact phrases and structural problems. |
-| One rewrite can quietly alter source details. | A local fact gate checks protected strings before the edit is returned. |
-| The model tends to overcorrect into fragments or forced casualness. | An overcorrection pass checks readability, rhythm, grammar, and voice. |
-| Each session starts from scratch. | Optional, reason-labelled preferences can be learned privately. |
+The installed skill ships no model. Your AI assistant, whether Claude, GPT, or another compatible model, reads and edits the draft. The skill supplies the workflow and local tools: a 0 to 100 writing score, source-detail checks, and a final comparison with the original.
-Zero Slop ships no model. Your AI assistant reads and edits the draft in context,
-using Claude, GPT, or another compatible model. The repository supplies the
-workflow and local tools for scoring and source checks.
+Use the score to locate passages worth reviewing. Optional private learning records reason-labelled corrections you provide; it does not learn a complete writing style.
 ## What it catches
-The scorer combines 294 weighted patterns with a 96-term lexicon. Examples include:
+The scorer uses 294 weighted patterns and a 96-term lexicon. It checks for:
 - binary contrast formulas: “It's not X. It's Y.”
 - canned openers: “We're thrilled to…” and “Here's the thing…”
 - vague attribution: “experts agree” and “studies show”
 - significance inflation: “marks a pivotal moment” and “a testament to”
-- promotional riders: “robust,” “seamless,” and “leverage” when used as hype
+- promotional wording: “robust,” “seamless,” and “leverage” when used as hype
 - repeated sentence shapes, crowded statistics, and overworked formatting
-Marketing terms are scored in context, so an ordinary technical use of a word need not trigger the same penalty. [`references/eval.md`](references/eval.md) documents all 80 checks.
+Context matters: a technical use of “robust” need not trigger the same penalty as sales hype. [`references/eval.md`](references/eval.md) describes all 80 checks.
-Unedited AI drafts averaged 77 in [`bench/examples.json`](bench/examples.json).
-Human writing scored 9 to 21 in
-[`data/corpus/must-not-flag/`](data/corpus/must-not-flag/). These are reference
-points for the scorer, not authorship boundaries.
+Unedited AI drafts averaged 77 in [`bench/examples.json`](bench/examples.json). Human writing scored 9 to 21 in [`data/corpus/must-not-flag/`](data/corpus/must-not-flag/). Use these to calibrate the scorer; they cannot establish authorship.
-## How it works
+## The editing workflow
 ![Zero Slop's eight editorial responsibilities, private learning loop, and separate release review](assets/engine.svg)
-Eight responsibilities form one workflow. They are jobs, not separate models.
-Research supports the checks, not the number eight, which is an engineering
-choice.
+Eight responsibilities form one workflow. Each stage is a job; several can share a model. Research informed the checks. We chose eight stages as an engineering convention.
 | Stage | Job |
 |---|---|
@@ -198,29 +143,19 @@ choice.
 | 7. Verifier | Compare the edit with the source for meaning, qualifiers, voice, and format. |
 | 8. Fresh-eyes finalizer | Apply only safe final polish, then run one last local check. |
-The free web editor combines the five AI responsibilities into one response and
-makes at most one live model call. A single response does not provide independent review.
-Any final change receives one final local recheck.
+The free web editor combines five AI jobs in at most one live model call. This is not independent model review. Any final change receives one final local recheck.
-If repair fails, return the safest edit with a warning. No open-ended rewrite loop.
+If repair fails, the editor returns the safest edit with a warning and stops there.
-### Review the reader's side
+### Optional reader review
-Ask: **“Review this for backend engineers. Where would they stop reading?
-Don't rewrite it.”** Optional skim, passage reactions, and notes-only recall
-produce comments and revision strips. Simulations cannot establish human behavior;
-sequential review requires isolated contexts. The [workflow](references/reader-review.md)
-explains privacy, limits, and reporting. Hosted calls are unchanged.
-Inspired by [First Reader](bench/first-reader/), a review-only skill. Zero Slop
-also rewrites and checks source details. Neither has established human-reader
-accuracy; First Reader gets no invented rewrite score.
+You can ask the skill where a particular audience might stop reading without requesting an edit. The [reader-review guide](references/reader-review.md) explains the limits: simulated reactions are not evidence of what real readers prefer. This optional mode adds no hosted model calls.
 ## Evidence and limits
-### Same model, same 18 drafts
+### A saved, same-model editing test
-A saved replay ran Zero Slop and three comparable open-source instruction sets over the same drafts with GPT-5.4, high reasoning, and pinned instructions. The outputs are frozen and reproducible.
+We ran Zero Slop and three open-source instruction sets on our AI Slop test corpus (18 samples), using GPT-5.4, high reasoning, and pinned instructions. Saved outputs are reproducible. The test partly uses Zero Slop's checks.
 | Method | Mean writing score ↓ | Passed local gates | Source check passed | Mean length change |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
@@ -230,16 +165,14 @@ A saved replay ran Zero Slop and three comparable open-source instruction sets o
 | no-ai-slop | 28.4 | 12/18 | 17/18 | -13.7% |
 | humanizer | 35.4 | 9/18 | 17/18 | -7.2% |
-![Fresh same-model editing replay on 18 drafts, with lower scores better](assets/bench-search-rewrites.png)
+![Writing scores and local checks for a saved, same-model replay of the AI Slop test corpus; lower scores are better](assets/bench-search-rewrites.png)
-This small LLM-reviewed regression study measures repeatable behavior; it does not establish universal writing quality. The drafts, hashes, method versions, prompts, and limitations are in [`bench/README.md`](bench/README.md).
+Zero Slop's saved rewrites cleared the listed checks. We have not shown that readers prefer them or that the result generalizes. Drafts, hashes, versions, prompts, and limitations are in [`bench/README.md`](bench/README.md).
-Zero Slop's frozen outputs came from v2.5.9; newer versions only rescore those
-saved outputs. The current scorer matched the prior 84.2% result on the fixed
-38-item editorial panel. These fixed-sample checks are not field accuracy.
+Zero Slop's outputs came from v2.5.9; newer versions only rescore them. The current scorer matched the prior 84.2% result on a fixed 38-item editorial panel. That is not field accuracy.
 <details>
-<summary>More validation</summary>
+<summary>Other tests and their limits</summary>
 - A method-hidden editorial preference replay: [`bench/incumbent-blind-replay/`](bench/incumbent-blind-replay/)
 - External-checker clean rates: [`assets/bench-external-checker.png`](assets/bench-external-checker.png)
@@ -247,23 +180,11 @@ saved outputs. The current scorer matched the prior 84.2% result on the fixed
 - Current-model corpus measurements: [`assets/bench-raid-plus.png`](assets/bench-raid-plus.png)
 - Antithesis regression set: [`assets/bench-antithesis.png`](assets/bench-antithesis.png)
-On the 75 labelled antithesis pairs, the current reading pass reached 91.2% recall across the full set, 100% recall on shapes in reach, and 100% precision. The labels are maintainer-authored and the pairs are constructed, so this is a regression floor rather than field accuracy.
-Local speed measurements cover the checks, with editing time excluded. On one
-Apple silicon Mac, the scorer processed 1,000 documents in a median of 1.9929
-seconds (501.8 per second); the five runs ranged from 1.9614 to 2.0945 seconds.
-It scored a 15,201-word document in a median of 0.3223 seconds. The slowest
-stress case took 2.2932 seconds, and learning from an 8,000-word edit took
-0.1592 seconds. The measurements and machine details are in
-[`bench/performance-results.json`](bench/performance-results.json).
+On 75 labelled antithesis pairs, the reading pass reached 91.2% recall across the full set, 100% recall on shapes in reach, and 100% precision. We constructed and labelled them; this is a regression test, not field accuracy.
-Across 12 interleaved runs against 2.7.7, we measured 0.26% lower median throughput,
-within the 5% regression limit. Local timing, not an SLA. The two-way replay used
-Zero Slop v2.6.0.
+Local timings exclude AI editing. On one Apple silicon Mac, the scorer checked 1,000 documents in a median 1.9929 seconds (501.8 per second). Across 12 interleaved runs against 2.7.7, it had 0.26% lower median throughput, within the 5% regression limit. The two-way replay used Zero Slop v2.6.0. [Machine and results](bench/performance-results.json). These timings are not a service-level guarantee.
-The [RAID+ audit](bench/raid-plus-corpus/README.md) checks how the scorer responds
-to output from different models. Its pinned sample contains 7,627 usable
-generations:
+The [RAID+ audit](bench/raid-plus-corpus/README.md) asks a different question: how often does the scorer flag writing from different models? The pinned sample contains 7,627 usable generations:
 | Model | Texts scored | Mean writing score ↓ | At or above 25 |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|
@@ -272,31 +193,25 @@ generations:
 | Gemma 3 27B | 1,634 | 21.6 | 30.4% |
 | Llama 3.3 70B | 2,000 | 25.5 | 41.7% |
-RAID+ labels record which model produced each text; they do not grade writing
-quality. The [Beemo paired-edit audit](bench/beemo-corpus/README.md) checks how
-scores change after human editing: raw responses averaged 30.2, expert edits
-25.3, and human answers 20.0. Beemo also lacks writing-quality labels.
+RAID+ records which model wrote each passage, not whether it reads well. The [Beemo paired-edit audit](bench/beemo-corpus/README.md) asks how scores change after human editing: raw responses averaged 30.2, expert edits 25.3, and human answers 20.0. Beemo has no writing-quality labels either.
 </details>
-### Documented capability audit
+### Documented features
 ![Documented capabilities at pinned repository versions](assets/competitor-capabilities.png)
-This chart says nothing about writing quality or which tool writes better. It
-records documented features at pinned commits; the data and reproduction notes
-are in [`bench/README.md`](bench/README.md).
+The chart compares features documented at pinned commits. It does not measure how well any tool writes. See [`bench/README.md`](bench/README.md) for data and reproduction notes.
-The design follows research on [predictable wording in machine text](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11305) and [overused vocabulary](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07016). It deliberately avoids authorship claims because detectors can [misclassify non-native English](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02819).
+The checks draw on research into [predictable machine wording](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11305) and [overused vocabulary](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07016). Zero Slop cannot identify an author: detectors can [misclassify non-native English](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02819).
 ## Private learning
-Learning begins only when you provide an original output and your reason-labelled edit. Zero Slop does not monitor files, browsers, or publishing tools. Private data stays under `$ZERO_SLOP_HOME`; it is not committed to this repository and does not retrain the model.
+You decide whether to teach Zero Slop a preference. Give it an original output, your edited version, and the reason for the change. It does not watch your files, browser, or publishing tools. Private data stays under `$ZERO_SLOP_HOME`; it is not committed to this repository or used to retrain a model.
-A profile selected by name can exempt existing watchlist words. It does not
-learn cadence, tone, or a complete writing style.
+A profile selected by name can exempt existing watchlist words. It does not learn your cadence, tone, or entire writing style.
-## Repository map
+## Find the source
 | Path | Purpose |
 |---|---|
@@ -309,15 +224,15 @@ learn cadence, tone, or a complete writing style.
 | [`mcp/`](mcp/) | Optional hosted MCP server documentation |
 | [`DISTRIBUTION.md`](DISTRIBUTION.md) | Direct installs, marketplace submissions, and release synchronization |
-## Contributing and support
+## Contribute or get help
-Bug reports, false positives, examples, and carefully tested pattern improvements are welcome. Read [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](CONTRIBUTING.md) before opening a pull request, use the structured [issue forms](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/issues/new/choose), or start a [Discussion](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/discussions).
+Found a false positive, a broken check, or a better example? Use the [issue forms](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/issues/new/choose) or start a [Discussion](https://github.com/manavmishra/ZeroSlop/discussions). If you want to change a pattern, read [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](CONTRIBUTING.md) and include tests with your pull request.
-For setup help and responsible disclosure, see [`SUPPORT.md`](SUPPORT.md) and [`SECURITY.md`](SECURITY.md).
+For setup help, see [`SUPPORT.md`](SUPPORT.md). Report security issues through [`SECURITY.md`](SECURITY.md).
 ## Credits
-Ideas from [First Reader](https://github.com/Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/tree/f56f4febaac4eb869c2e98859e78612889913d3e/agent_skills/first-reader), [no-ai-slop](https://github.com/petergyang/no-ai-slop), [humanizer](https://github.com/blader/humanizer), [de-slop](https://github.com/isatimur/de-slop), [stop-slop](https://github.com/hardikpandya/stop-slop), [unslop-text](https://github.com/JCarterJohnson/vibecoded-design-tells/tree/main/unslop-ai-text), and [avoid-ai-writing](https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing).
+Zero Slop builds on ideas from [First Reader](https://github.com/Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/tree/f56f4febaac4eb869c2e98859e78612889913d3e/agent_skills/first-reader), [no-ai-slop](https://github.com/petergyang/no-ai-slop), [humanizer](https://github.com/blader/humanizer), [de-slop](https://github.com/isatimur/de-slop), [stop-slop](https://github.com/hardikpandya/stop-slop), [unslop-text](https://github.com/JCarterJohnson/vibecoded-design-tells/tree/main/unslop-ai-text), and [avoid-ai-writing](https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing).
 ## License

package/SKILL.md CHANGED Viewed

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 name: zero-slop
 license: MIT
 metadata:
-  version: "2.12.1"
+  version: "2.12.4"
   author: manavmishra
 description: Edit drafts into natural prose, inspect AI-sounding patterns, or review how a specified audience might respond passage by passage. Zero Slop runs inside the user's existing AI assistant with local tools that protect source details. Use for humanizing or de-slopping writing, polishing outward-facing prose, social drafts, final editorial checks, or an explicit simulated reader review. Preserve facts, voice and format; reader simulations are hypotheses, not human feedback.
 ---

package/docs/cli.md CHANGED Viewed

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Use `deslop` for hosted editing with MCP parity. Use `score` for offline checks.
 ```sh
-npm install --global zero-slop@2.12.1
+npm install --global zero-slop@2.12.4
 zero-slop deslop draft.md --genre professional
 zero-slop deslop - --genre email < draft.txt
 zero-slop deslop draft.md --json --require-approved

package/gemini-extension.json CHANGED Viewed

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "zero-slop",
-  "version": "2.12.1",
+  "version": "2.12.4",
   "description": "Find and fix canned AI writing while preserving the facts, voice, and format.",
   "mcpServers": {
     "zero-slop": {

package/package.json CHANGED Viewed

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "zero-slop",
-  "version": "2.12.1",
+  "version": "2.12.4",
   "description": "An editing skill, offline writing checks, and a CLI for the hosted Zero Slop MCP pipeline. Find stock AI phrasing, rewrite, and check source details.",
   "bin": {
     "zero-slop": "bin/zero-slop.mjs"

package/plugin.json CHANGED Viewed

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "$schema": "https://agent-plugins.org/schemas/1.0.0/plugin.schema.json",
   "name": "zero-slop",
-  "version": "2.12.1",
+  "version": "2.12.4",
   "description": "Find and fix canned AI writing while preserving the facts, voice, and format.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Manav Mishra",