wtf-p 0.7.0 → 0.7.2

package/vendors/plugin/actions/research-gap.json

@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
   ],
   "tools": [
     "bibliography.index",
+    "citation.fetch",
     "citation.rank",
     "citation.scholar-lookup",
     "citation.semantic-scholar"
@@ -95,7 +96,7 @@
     },
     {
       "id": "user.gate",
-      "scope": "research scope and depth"
+      "scope": "the external providers, bounded query set, and research scope and depth"
     }
   ]
 }

package/vendors/plugin/ai.iowarp.clio/agents/wtfp-research-synthesizer.md

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ Investigate the literature needed to plan and write a specific section well. The
 ## Boundaries
 
 - This is a `mutation-report` role. It may write only the research and suggestion artifacts authorized by the invoking action.
+- When external literature search is approved, `citation-search` may run with `--backend=cite-nexus` and an explicit `--providers` list after the gate. Returned results stay candidates, and this role never performs a bibliography write.
 - Never fabricate a citation, identifier, quotation, metadata field, source conclusion, or claim of exhaustive coverage.
 - Never overwrite an existing `project://sources/{source}` record. Additions remain provisional until identity and provenance are verified by an authorized action.
 - Do not explore alternatives that author decisions explicitly deferred or rejected.

package/vendors/plugin/ai.iowarp.clio/prompts/wtfp/help.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ display-only: true
 <!-- Generated by WTF-P adapter compiler v5 from protocol/actions/help; do not edit. -->
 
 ```text
-WTF-P 0.7.0 on Clio Coder: evidence-grounded academic writing
+WTF-P 0.7.2 on Clio Coder: evidence-grounded academic writing
 
 Start here
   /wtfp:new-paper [input]

package/vendors/plugin/ai.iowarp.clio/prompts/wtfp/research-gap.md

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Manuscript prose and supporting context, research, plan, review, summary, handof
 ## Procedure
 
 1. Resolve the research question and section scope against locked/deferred decisions; agree on depth and source constraints.
-2. Search declared scholarly services, verify source identity and inspection depth, and separate source records from claim-level evidence.
+2. Search declared scholarly services only after the gate names the providers and bounded query set. When using the bundled dispatcher, `citation-search` may run with `--backend=cite-nexus` and an explicit `--providers` list after this gate. Returned results stay candidates, and this action performs no bibliography write. Verify source identity and inspection depth, and separate source records from claim-level evidence.
 3. Synthesize supported, conflicting, and missing evidence into a Markdown research artifact; link new records and disclose limitations.
 
 ## Bundled tool execution

package/vendors/plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "$schema": "https://agent-plugins.org/schemas/1.0.0/plugin.schema.json",
   "name": "wtfp",
-  "version": "0.7.0",
+  "version": "0.7.2",
   "description": "Portable, evidence-grounded academic research and writing workflows.",
   "author": {
     "name": "akougkas"

package/vendors/plugin/roles/research-synthesizer.md

@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ Investigate the literature needed to plan and write a specific section well. The
 ## Boundaries
 
 - This is a `mutation-report` role. It may write only the research and suggestion artifacts authorized by the invoking action.
+- When external literature search is approved, `citation-search` may run with `--backend=cite-nexus` and an explicit `--providers` list after the gate. Returned results stay candidates, and this role never performs a bibliography write.
 - Never fabricate a citation, identifier, quotation, metadata field, source conclusion, or claim of exhaustive coverage.
 - Never overwrite an existing `project://sources/{source}` record. Additions remain provisional until identity and provenance are verified by an authorized action.
 - Do not explore alternatives that author decisions explicitly deferred or rejected.

package/vendors/plugin/skills/wtfp-research-literature/references/actions.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Contract: [protocol/actions/research-gap.json](../../../actions/research-gap.jso
    - `standard`: run a focused, reproducible search across the most relevant categories;
    - `deep`: map foundational, recent, competing, gap-defining, and methodological work, including important disagreements and intellectual lineage.
 5. Form search questions and inclusion criteria before searching. Record databases or corpora, query strings, date, filters, and stopping rule.
-6. Search authoritative scholarly sources when external research is approved and available. Deduplicate candidates by persistent identifier, then normalized title.
+6. Search authoritative scholarly sources only after disclosing and receiving approval for the external providers and bounded query set. When using the bundled dispatcher, `citation-search` may run with `--backend=cite-nexus` and an explicit `--providers` list after this gate. Returned results stay candidates, and this action performs no bibliography write. Deduplicate candidates by persistent identifier, then normalized title.
 7. Verify each retained source from its primary record or publication. Create a `project://sources/{source}` record with title, creators, year, source kind, identifiers, citation key, status, provenance, inspection depth, and verification time.
 8. Read enough of each source to distinguish its actual claim, method, population, result, and limitation. Do not cite an abstract-only impression as full-paper evidence.
 9. Create `project://evidence/{evidence}` separately for each retained claim-level interpretation, with relation, locator, limitations, confidence, and inspection depth. Synthesize by question rather than listing papers; identify consensus, disagreement, methodological differences, missing evidence, and defensible positioning.

package/vendors/plugin/workflows/research-gap.md

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Manuscript prose and supporting context, research, plan, review, summary, handof
 ## Procedure
 
 1. Resolve the research question and section scope against locked/deferred decisions; agree on depth and source constraints.
-2. Search declared scholarly services, verify source identity and inspection depth, and separate source records from claim-level evidence.
+2. Search declared scholarly services only after the gate names the providers and bounded query set. When using the bundled dispatcher, `citation-search` may run with `--backend=cite-nexus` and an explicit `--providers` list after this gate. Returned results stay candidates, and this action performs no bibliography write. Verify source identity and inspection depth, and separate source records from claim-level evidence.
 3. Synthesize supported, conflicting, and missing evidence into a Markdown research artifact; link new records and disclose limitations.
 
 ## Bundled tool execution