workspace-architect 1.4.1 → 1.5.1

package/assets/prompts/model-recommendation.prompt.md

@@ -1,677 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Analyze chatmode or prompt files and recommend optimal AI models based on task complexity, required capabilities, and cost-efficiency"
-mode: "agent"
-tools:
-  - "search/codebase"
-  - "fetch"
-  - "context7/*"
-model: Auto (copilot)
----
-
-# AI Model Recommendation for Copilot Chat Modes and Prompts
-
-## Mission
-
-Analyze `.chatmode.md` or `.prompt.md` files to understand their purpose, complexity, and required capabilities, then recommend the most suitable AI model(s) from GitHub Copilot's available options. Provide rationale based on task characteristics, model strengths, cost-efficiency, and performance trade-offs.
-
-## Scope & Preconditions
-
-- **Input**: Path to a `.chatmode.md` or `.prompt.md` file
-- **Available Models**: GPT-4.1, GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, GPT-5 Codex, Claude Sonnet 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Grok Code Fast 1, o3, o4-mini (with deprecation dates)
-- **Model Auto-Selection**: Available in VS Code (Sept 2025+) - selects from GPT-4.1, GPT-5 mini, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4.5 (excludes premium multipliers > 1)
-- **Context**: GitHub Copilot subscription tiers (Free: 2K completions + 50 chat/month with 0x models only; Pro: unlimited 0x + 1000 premium/month; Pro+: unlimited 0x + 5000 premium/month)
-
-## Inputs
-
-Required:
-
-- `${input:filePath:Path to .chatmode.md or .prompt.md file}` - Absolute or workspace-relative path to the file to analyze
-
-Optional:
-
-- `${input:subscriptionTier:Pro}` - User's Copilot subscription tier (Free, Pro, Pro+) - defaults to Pro
-- `${input:priorityFactor:Balanced}` - Optimization priority (Speed, Cost, Quality, Balanced) - defaults to Balanced
-
-## Workflow
-
-### 1. File Analysis Phase
-
-**Read and Parse File**:
-
-- Read the target `.chatmode.md` or `.prompt.md` file
-- Extract frontmatter (description, mode, tools, model if specified)
-- Analyze body content to identify:
-  - Task complexity (simple/moderate/complex/advanced)
-  - Required reasoning depth (basic/intermediate/advanced/expert)
-  - Code generation needs (minimal/moderate/extensive)
-  - Multi-turn conversation requirements
-  - Context window needs (small/medium/large)
-  - Specialized capabilities (image analysis, long-context, real-time data)
-
-**Categorize Task Type**:
-
-Identify the primary task category based on content analysis:
-
-1. **Simple Repetitive Tasks**:
-
-   - Pattern: Formatting, simple refactoring, adding comments/docstrings, basic CRUD
-   - Characteristics: Straightforward logic, minimal context, fast execution preferred
-   - Keywords: format, comment, simple, basic, add docstring, rename, move
-
-2. **Code Generation & Implementation**:
-
-   - Pattern: Writing functions/classes, implementing features, API endpoints, tests
-   - Characteristics: Moderate complexity, domain knowledge, idiomatic code
-   - Keywords: implement, create, generate, write, build, scaffold
-
-3. **Complex Refactoring & Architecture**:
-
-   - Pattern: System design, architectural review, large-scale refactoring, performance optimization
-   - Characteristics: Deep reasoning, multiple components, trade-off analysis
-   - Keywords: architect, refactor, optimize, design, scale, review architecture
-
-4. **Debugging & Problem-Solving**:
-
-   - Pattern: Bug fixing, error analysis, systematic troubleshooting, root cause analysis
-   - Characteristics: Step-by-step reasoning, debugging context, verification needs
-   - Keywords: debug, fix, troubleshoot, diagnose, error, investigate
-
-5. **Planning & Research**:
-
-   - Pattern: Feature planning, research, documentation analysis, ADR creation
-   - Characteristics: Read-only, context gathering, decision-making support
-   - Keywords: plan, research, analyze, investigate, document, assess
-
-6. **Code Review & Quality Analysis**:
-
-   - Pattern: Security analysis, performance review, best practices validation, compliance checking
-   - Characteristics: Critical thinking, pattern recognition, domain expertise
-   - Keywords: review, analyze, security, performance, compliance, validate
-
-7. **Specialized Domain Tasks**:
-
-   - Pattern: Django/framework-specific, accessibility (WCAG), testing (TDD), API design
-   - Characteristics: Deep domain knowledge, framework conventions, standards compliance
-   - Keywords: django, accessibility, wcag, rest, api, testing, tdd
-
-8. **Advanced Reasoning & Multi-Step Workflows**:
-   - Pattern: Algorithmic optimization, complex data transformations, multi-phase workflows
-   - Characteristics: Advanced reasoning, mathematical/algorithmic thinking, sequential logic
-   - Keywords: algorithm, optimize, transform, sequential, reasoning, calculate
-
-**Extract Capability Requirements**:
-
-Based on `tools` in frontmatter and body instructions:
-
-- **Read-only tools** (search, fetch, usages, githubRepo): Lower complexity, faster models suitable
-- **Write operations** (edit/editFiles, new): Moderate complexity, accuracy important
-- **Execution tools** (runCommands, runTests, runTasks): Validation needs, iterative approach
-- **Advanced tools** (context7/\*, sequential-thinking/\*): Complex reasoning, premium models beneficial
-- **Multi-modal** (image analysis references): Requires vision-capable models
-
-### 2. Model Evaluation Phase
-
-**Apply Model Selection Criteria**:
-
-For each available model, evaluate against these dimensions:
-
-#### Model Capabilities Matrix
-
-| Model                   | Multiplier | Speed    | Code Quality | Reasoning | Context | Vision | Best For                                          |
-| ----------------------- | ---------- | -------- | ------------ | --------- | ------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------- |
-| GPT-4.1                 | 0x         | Fast     | Good         | Good      | 128K    | ✅     | Balanced general tasks, included in all plans     |
-| GPT-5 mini              | 0x         | Fastest  | Good         | Basic     | 128K    | ❌     | Simple tasks, quick responses, cost-effective     |
-| GPT-5                   | 1x         | Moderate | Excellent    | Advanced  | 128K    | ✅     | Complex code, advanced reasoning, multi-turn chat |
-| GPT-5 Codex             | 1x         | Fast     | Excellent    | Good      | 128K    | ❌     | Code optimization, refactoring, algorithmic tasks |
-| Claude Sonnet 3.5       | 1x         | Moderate | Excellent    | Excellent | 200K    | ✅     | Code generation, long context, balanced reasoning |
-| Claude Sonnet 4         | 1x         | Moderate | Excellent    | Advanced  | 200K    | ❌     | Complex code, robust reasoning, enterprise tasks  |
-| Claude Sonnet 4.5       | 1x         | Moderate | Excellent    | Expert    | 200K    | ✅     | Advanced code, architecture, design patterns      |
-| Claude Opus 4.1         | 10x        | Slow     | Outstanding  | Expert    | 1M      | ✅     | Large codebases, architectural review, research   |
-| Gemini 2.5 Pro          | 1x         | Moderate | Excellent    | Advanced  | 2M      | ✅     | Very long context, multi-modal, real-time data    |
-| Gemini 2.0 Flash (dep.) | 0.25x      | Fastest  | Good         | Good      | 1M      | ❌     | Fast responses, cost-effective (deprecated)       |
-| Grok Code Fast 1        | 0.25x      | Fastest  | Good         | Basic     | 128K    | ❌     | Speed-critical simple tasks, preview (free)       |
-| o3 (deprecated)         | 1x         | Slow     | Good         | Expert    | 128K    | ❌     | Advanced reasoning, algorithmic optimization      |
-| o4-mini (deprecated)    | 0.33x      | Fast     | Good         | Good      | 128K    | ❌     | Reasoning at lower cost (deprecated)              |
-
-#### Selection Decision Tree
-
-```
-START
-  │
-  ├─ Task Complexity?
-  │   ├─ Simple/Repetitive → GPT-5 mini, Grok Code Fast 1, GPT-4.1
-  │   ├─ Moderate → GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5
-  │   └─ Complex/Advanced → Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Opus 4.1
-  │
-  ├─ Reasoning Depth?
-  │   ├─ Basic → GPT-5 mini, Grok Code Fast 1
-  │   ├─ Intermediate → GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4
-  │   ├─ Advanced → GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4.5
-  │   └─ Expert → Claude Opus 4.1, o3 (deprecated)
-  │
-  ├─ Code-Specific?
-  │   ├─ Yes → GPT-5 Codex, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5
-  │   └─ No → GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 4
-  │
-  ├─ Context Size?
-  │   ├─ Small (<50K tokens) → Any model
-  │   ├─ Medium (50-200K) → Claude models, GPT-5, Gemini
-  │   ├─ Large (200K-1M) → Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Opus 4.1
-  │   └─ Very Large (>1M) → Gemini 2.5 Pro (2M), Claude Opus 4.1 (1M)
-  │
-  ├─ Vision Required?
-  │   ├─ Yes → GPT-4.1, GPT-5, Claude Sonnet 3.5/4.5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Opus 4.1
-  │   └─ No → All models
-  │
-  ├─ Cost Sensitivity? (based on subscriptionTier)
-  │   ├─ Free Tier → 0x models only: GPT-4.1, GPT-5 mini, Grok Code Fast 1
-  │   ├─ Pro (1000 premium/month) → Prioritize 0x, use 1x judiciously, avoid 10x
-  │   └─ Pro+ (5000 premium/month) → 1x freely, 10x for critical tasks
-  │
-  └─ Priority Factor?
-      ├─ Speed → GPT-5 mini, Grok Code Fast 1, Gemini 2.0 Flash
-      ├─ Cost → 0x models (GPT-4.1, GPT-5 mini) or lower multipliers (0.25x, 0.33x)
-      ├─ Quality → Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.1
-      └─ Balanced → GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5
-```
-
-### 3. Recommendation Generation Phase
-
-**Primary Recommendation**:
-
-- Identify the single best model based on task analysis and decision tree
-- Provide specific rationale tied to file content characteristics
-- Explain multiplier cost implications for user's subscription tier
-
-**Alternative Recommendations**:
-
-- Suggest 1-2 alternative models with trade-off explanations
-- Include scenarios where alternatives might be preferred
-- Consider priority factor overrides (speed vs. quality vs. cost)
-
-**Auto-Selection Guidance**:
-
-- Assess if task is suitable for auto model selection (excludes premium models > 1x)
-- Explain when manual selection is beneficial vs. letting Copilot choose
-- Note any limitations of auto-selection for the specific task
-
-**Deprecation Warnings**:
-
-- Flag if file currently specifies a deprecated model (o3, o4-mini, Claude Sonnet 3.7, Gemini 2.0 Flash)
-- Provide migration path to recommended replacement
-- Include timeline for deprecation (e.g., "o3 deprecating 2025-10-23")
-
-**Subscription Tier Considerations**:
-
-- **Free Tier**: Recommend only 0x multiplier models (GPT-4.1, GPT-5 mini, Grok Code Fast 1)
-- **Pro Tier**: Balance between 0x (unlimited) and 1x (1000/month) models
-- **Pro+ Tier**: More freedom with 1x models (5000/month), justify 10x usage for exceptional cases
-
-### 4. Integration Recommendations
-
-**Frontmatter Update Guidance**:
-
-If file does not specify a `model` field:
-
-```markdown
-## Recommendation: Add Model Specification
-
-Current frontmatter:
-\`\`\`yaml
-
----
-
-description: "..."
-tools: [...]
-
----
-
-\`\`\`
-
-Recommended frontmatter:
-\`\`\`yaml
-
----
-
-description: "..."
-model: "[Recommended Model Name]"
-tools: [...]
-
----
-
-\`\`\`
-
-Rationale: [Explanation of why this model is optimal for this task]
-```
-
-If file already specifies a model:
-
-```markdown
-## Current Model Assessment
-
-Specified model: `[Current Model]` (Multiplier: [X]x)
-
-Recommendation: [Keep current model | Consider switching to [Recommended Model]]
-
-Rationale: [Explanation]
-```
-
-**Tool Alignment Check**:
-
-Verify model capabilities align with specified tools:
-
-- If tools include `context7/*` or `sequential-thinking/*`: Recommend advanced reasoning models (Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.1)
-- If tools include vision-related references: Ensure model supports images (flag if GPT-5 Codex, Claude Sonnet 4, or mini models selected)
-- If tools are read-only (search, fetch): Suggest cost-effective models (GPT-5 mini, Grok Code Fast 1)
-
-### 5. Context7 Integration for Up-to-Date Information
-
-**Leverage Context7 for Model Documentation**:
-
-When uncertainty exists about current model capabilities, use Context7 to fetch latest information:
-
-```markdown
-**Verification with Context7**:
-
-Using `context7/get-library-docs` with library ID `/websites/github_en_copilot`:
-
-- Query topic: "model capabilities [specific capability question]"
-- Retrieve current model features, multipliers, deprecation status
-- Cross-reference against analyzed file requirements
-```
-
-**Example Context7 Usage**:
-
-```
-If unsure whether Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports image analysis:
-→ Use context7 with topic "Claude Sonnet 4.5 vision image capabilities"
-→ Confirm feature support before recommending for multi-modal tasks
-```
-
-## Output Expectations
-
-### Report Structure
-
-Generate a structured markdown report with the following sections:
-
-```markdown
-# AI Model Recommendation Report
-
-**File Analyzed**: `[file path]`
-**File Type**: [chatmode | prompt]
-**Analysis Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
-**Subscription Tier**: [Free | Pro | Pro+]
-
----
-
-## File Summary
-
-**Description**: [from frontmatter]
-**Mode**: [ask | edit | agent]
-**Tools**: [tool list]
-**Current Model**: [specified model or "Not specified"]
-
-## Task Analysis
-
-### Task Complexity
-
-- **Level**: [Simple | Moderate | Complex | Advanced]
-- **Reasoning Depth**: [Basic | Intermediate | Advanced | Expert]
-- **Context Requirements**: [Small | Medium | Large | Very Large]
-- **Code Generation**: [Minimal | Moderate | Extensive]
-- **Multi-Modal**: [Yes | No]
-
-### Task Category
-
-[Primary category from 8 categories listed in Workflow Phase 1]
-
-### Key Characteristics
-
-- Characteristic 1: [explanation]
-- Characteristic 2: [explanation]
-- Characteristic 3: [explanation]
-
-## Model Recommendation
-
-### 🏆 Primary Recommendation: [Model Name]
-
-**Multiplier**: [X]x ([cost implications for subscription tier])
-**Strengths**:
-
-- Strength 1: [specific to task]
-- Strength 2: [specific to task]
-- Strength 3: [specific to task]
-
-**Rationale**:
-[Detailed explanation connecting task characteristics to model capabilities]
-
-**Cost Impact** (for [Subscription Tier]):
-
-- Per request multiplier: [X]x
-- Estimated usage: [rough estimate based on task frequency]
-- [Additional cost context]
-
-### 🔄 Alternative Options
-
-#### Option 1: [Model Name]
-
-- **Multiplier**: [X]x
-- **When to Use**: [specific scenarios]
-- **Trade-offs**: [compared to primary recommendation]
-
-#### Option 2: [Model Name]
-
-- **Multiplier**: [X]x
-- **When to Use**: [specific scenarios]
-- **Trade-offs**: [compared to primary recommendation]
-
-### 📊 Model Comparison for This Task
-
-| Criterion        | [Primary Model] | [Alternative 1] | [Alternative 2] |
-| ---------------- | --------------- | --------------- | --------------- |
-| Task Fit         | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐      | ⭐⭐⭐⭐        | ⭐⭐⭐          |
-| Code Quality     | [rating]        | [rating]        | [rating]        |
-| Reasoning        | [rating]        | [rating]        | [rating]        |
-| Speed            | [rating]        | [rating]        | [rating]        |
-| Cost Efficiency  | [rating]        | [rating]        | [rating]        |
-| Context Capacity | [capacity]      | [capacity]      | [capacity]      |
-| Vision Support   | [Yes/No]        | [Yes/No]        | [Yes/No]        |
-
-## Auto Model Selection Assessment
-
-**Suitability**: [Recommended | Not Recommended | Situational]
-
-[Explanation of whether auto-selection is appropriate for this task]
-
-**Rationale**:
-
-- [Reason 1]
-- [Reason 2]
-
-**Manual Override Scenarios**:
-
-- [Scenario where user should manually select model]
-- [Scenario where user should manually select model]
-
-## Implementation Guidance
-
-### Frontmatter Update
-
-[Provide specific code block showing recommended frontmatter change]
-
-### Model Selection in VS Code
-
-**To Use Recommended Model**:
-
-1. Open Copilot Chat
-2. Click model dropdown (currently shows "[current model or Auto]")
-3. Select **[Recommended Model Name]**
-4. [Optional: When to switch back to Auto]
-
-**Keyboard Shortcut**: `Cmd+Shift+P` → "Copilot: Change Model"
-
-### Tool Alignment Verification
-
-[Check results: Are specified tools compatible with recommended model?]
-
-✅ **Compatible Tools**: [list]
-⚠️ **Potential Limitations**: [list if any]
-
-## Deprecation Notices
-
-[If applicable, list any deprecated models in current configuration]
-
-⚠️ **Deprecated Model in Use**: [Model Name] (Deprecation date: [YYYY-MM-DD])
-
-**Migration Path**:
-
-- **Current**: [Deprecated Model]
-- **Replacement**: [Recommended Model]
-- **Action Required**: Update `model:` field in frontmatter by [date]
-- **Behavioral Changes**: [any expected differences]
-
-## Context7 Verification
-
-[If Context7 was used for verification]
-
-**Queries Executed**:
-
-- Topic: "[query topic]"
-- Library: `/websites/github_en_copilot`
-- Key Findings: [summary]
-
-## Additional Considerations
-
-### Subscription Tier Recommendations
-
-[Specific advice based on Free/Pro/Pro+ tier]
-
-### Priority Factor Adjustments
-
-[If user specified Speed/Cost/Quality/Balanced, explain how recommendation aligns]
-
-### Long-Term Model Strategy
-
-[Advice for when to re-evaluate model selection as file evolves]
-
----
-
-## Quick Reference
-
-**TL;DR**: Use **[Primary Model]** for this task due to [one-sentence rationale]. Cost: [X]x multiplier.
-
-**One-Line Update**:
-\`\`\`yaml
-model: "[Recommended Model Name]"
-\`\`\`
-```
-
-### Output Quality Standards
-
-- **Specific**: Tie all recommendations directly to file content, not generic advice
-- **Actionable**: Provide exact frontmatter code, VS Code steps, clear migration paths
-- **Contextualized**: Consider subscription tier, priority factor, deprecation timelines
-- **Evidence-Based**: Reference model capabilities from Context7 documentation when available
-- **Balanced**: Present trade-offs honestly (speed vs. quality vs. cost)
-- **Up-to-Date**: Flag deprecated models, suggest current alternatives
-
-## Quality Assurance
-
-### Validation Steps
-
-- [ ] File successfully read and parsed
-- [ ] Frontmatter extracted correctly (or noted if missing)
-- [ ] Task complexity accurately categorized (Simple/Moderate/Complex/Advanced)
-- [ ] Primary task category identified from 8 options
-- [ ] Model recommendation aligns with decision tree logic
-- [ ] Multiplier cost explained for user's subscription tier
-- [ ] Alternative models provided with clear trade-off explanations
-- [ ] Auto-selection guidance included (recommended/not recommended/situational)
-- [ ] Deprecated model warnings included if applicable
-- [ ] Frontmatter update example provided (valid YAML)
-- [ ] Tool alignment verified (model capabilities match specified tools)
-- [ ] Context7 used when verification needed for latest model information
-- [ ] Report includes all required sections (summary, analysis, recommendation, implementation)
-
-### Success Criteria
-
-- Recommendation is justified by specific file characteristics
-- Cost impact is clear and appropriate for subscription tier
-- Alternative models cover different priority factors (speed vs. quality vs. cost)
-- Frontmatter update is ready to copy-paste (no placeholders)
-- User can immediately act on recommendation (clear steps)
-- Report is readable and scannable (good structure, tables, emoji markers)
-
-### Failure Triggers
-
-- File path is invalid or unreadable → Stop and request valid path
-- File is not `.chatmode.md` or `.prompt.md` → Stop and clarify file type
-- Cannot determine task complexity from content → Request more specific file or clarification
-- Model recommendation contradicts documented capabilities → Use Context7 to verify current info
-- Subscription tier is invalid (not Free/Pro/Pro+) → Default to Pro and note assumption
-
-## Advanced Use Cases
-
-### Analyzing Multiple Files
-
-If user provides multiple files:
-
-1. Analyze each file individually
-2. Generate separate recommendations per file
-3. Provide summary table comparing recommendations
-4. Note any patterns (e.g., "All debug-related modes benefit from Claude Sonnet 4.5")
-
-### Comparative Analysis
-
-If user asks "Which model is better between X and Y for this file?":
-
-1. Focus comparison on those two models only
-2. Use side-by-side table format
-3. Declare a winner with specific reasoning
-4. Include cost comparison for subscription tier
-
-### Migration Planning
-
-If file specifies a deprecated model:
-
-1. Prioritize migration guidance in report
-2. Test current behavior expectations vs. replacement model capabilities
-3. Provide phased migration if breaking changes expected
-4. Include rollback plan if needed
-
-## Examples
-
-### Example 1: Simple Formatting Task
-
-**File**: `format-code.prompt.md`
-**Content**: "Format Python code with Black style, add type hints"
-**Recommendation**: GPT-5 mini (0x multiplier, fastest, sufficient for repetitive formatting)
-**Alternative**: Grok Code Fast 1 (0.25x, even faster, preview feature)
-**Rationale**: Task is simple and repetitive; premium reasoning not needed; speed prioritized
-
-### Example 2: Complex Architecture Review
-
-**File**: `architect.chatmode.md`
-**Content**: "Review system design for scalability, security, maintainability; analyze trade-offs; provide ADR-level recommendations"
-**Recommendation**: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (1x multiplier, expert reasoning, excellent for architecture)
-**Alternative**: Claude Opus 4.1 (10x, use for very large codebases >500K tokens)
-**Rationale**: Requires deep reasoning, architectural expertise, design pattern knowledge; Sonnet 4.5 excels at this
-
-### Example 3: Django Expert Mode
-
-**File**: `django.chatmode.md`
-**Content**: "Django 5.x expert with ORM optimization, async views, REST API design; uses context7 for up-to-date Django docs"
-**Recommendation**: GPT-5 (1x multiplier, advanced reasoning, excellent code quality)
-**Alternative**: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (1x, alternative perspective, strong with frameworks)
-**Rationale**: Domain expertise + context7 integration benefits from advanced reasoning; 1x cost justified for expert mode
-
-### Example 4: Free Tier User with Planning Mode
-
-**File**: `plan.chatmode.md`
-**Content**: "Research and planning mode with read-only tools (search, fetch, githubRepo)"
-**Subscription**: Free (2K completions + 50 chat requests/month, 0x models only)
-**Recommendation**: GPT-4.1 (0x, balanced, included in Free tier)
-**Alternative**: GPT-5 mini (0x, faster but less context)
-**Rationale**: Free tier restricted to 0x models; GPT-4.1 provides best balance of quality and context for planning tasks
-
-## Knowledge Base
-
-### Model Multiplier Cost Reference
-
-| Multiplier | Meaning                                          | Free Tier | Pro Usage | Pro+ Usage |
-| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------ | --------- | --------- | ---------- |
-| 0x         | Included in all plans, no premium count          | ✅        | Unlimited | Unlimited  |
-| 0.25x      | 4 requests = 1 premium request                   | ❌        | 4000 uses | 20000 uses |
-| 0.33x      | 3 requests = 1 premium request                   | ❌        | 3000 uses | 15000 uses |
-| 1x         | 1 request = 1 premium request                    | ❌        | 1000 uses | 5000 uses  |
-| 1.25x      | 1 request = 1.25 premium requests                | ❌        | 800 uses  | 4000 uses  |
-| 10x        | 1 request = 10 premium requests (very expensive) | ❌        | 100 uses  | 500 uses   |
-
-### Model Changelog & Deprecations (October 2025)
-
-**Deprecated Models** (Effective 2025-10-23):
-
-- ❌ o3 (1x) → Replace with GPT-5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 for reasoning
-- ❌ o4-mini (0.33x) → Replace with GPT-5 mini (0x) for cost, GPT-5 (1x) for quality
-- ❌ Claude Sonnet 3.7 (1x) → Replace with Claude Sonnet 4 or 4.5
-- ❌ Claude Sonnet 3.7 Thinking (1.25x) → Replace with Claude Sonnet 4.5
-- ❌ Gemini 2.0 Flash (0.25x) → Replace with Grok Code Fast 1 (0.25x) or GPT-5 mini (0x)
-
-**Preview Models** (Subject to Change):
-
-- 🧪 Claude Sonnet 4.5 (1x) - Preview status, may have API changes
-- 🧪 Grok Code Fast 1 (0.25x) - Preview, free during preview period
-
-**Stable Production Models**:
-
-- ✅ GPT-4.1, GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, GPT-5 Codex (OpenAI)
-- ✅ Claude Sonnet 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic)
-- ✅ Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google)
-
-### Auto Model Selection Behavior (Sept 2025+)
-
-**Included in Auto Selection**:
-
-- GPT-4.1 (0x)
-- GPT-5 mini (0x)
-- GPT-5 (1x)
-- Claude Sonnet 3.5 (1x)
-- Claude Sonnet 4.5 (1x)
-
-**Excluded from Auto Selection**:
-
-- Models with multiplier > 1 (Claude Opus 4.1, deprecated o3)
-- Models blocked by admin policies
-- Models unavailable in subscription plan (1x models in Free tier)
-
-**When Auto Selects**:
-
-- Copilot analyzes prompt complexity, context size, task type
-- Chooses from eligible pool based on availability and rate limits
-- Applies 10% multiplier discount on auto-selected models
-- Shows selected model on hover over response in Chat view
-
-## Context7 Query Templates
-
-Use these query patterns when verification needed:
-
-**Model Capabilities**:
-
-```
-Topic: "[Model Name] code generation quality capabilities"
-Library: /websites/github_en_copilot
-```
-
-**Model Multipliers**:
-
-```
-Topic: "[Model Name] request multiplier cost billing"
-Library: /websites/github_en_copilot
-```
-
-**Deprecation Status**:
-
-```
-Topic: "deprecated models October 2025 timeline"
-Library: /websites/github_en_copilot
-```
-
-**Vision Support**:
-
-```
-Topic: "[Model Name] image vision multimodal support"
-Library: /websites/github_en_copilot
-```
-
-**Auto Selection**:
-
-```
-Topic: "auto model selection behavior eligible models"
-Library: /websites/github_en_copilot
-```
-
----
-
-**Last Updated**: 2025-10-28
-**Model Data Current As Of**: October 2025
-**Deprecation Deadline**: 2025-10-23 for o3, o4-mini, Claude Sonnet 3.7 variants, Gemini 2.0 Flash