workspace-architect 1.3.0

package/assets/prompts/folder-structure-blueprint-generator.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,405 @@
+---
+description: 'Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt for analyzing and documenting project folder structures. Auto-detects project types (.NET, Java, React, Angular, Python, Node.js, Flutter), generates detailed blueprints with visualization options, naming conventions, file placement patterns, and extension templates for maintaining consistent code organization across diverse technology stacks.'
+mode: 'agent'
+---
+
+# Project Folder Structure Blueprint Generator
+
+## Configuration Variables
+
+${PROJECT_TYPE="Auto-detect|.NET|Java|React|Angular|Python|Node.js|Flutter|Other"} 
+<!-- Select primary technology -->
+
+${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES="Auto-detect|true|false"} 
+<!-- Is this a microservices architecture? -->
+
+${INCLUDES_FRONTEND="Auto-detect|true|false"} 
+<!-- Does project include frontend components? -->
+
+${IS_MONOREPO="Auto-detect|true|false"} 
+<!-- Is this a monorepo with multiple projects? -->
+
+${VISUALIZATION_STYLE="ASCII|Markdown List|Table"} 
+<!-- How to visualize the structure -->
+
+${DEPTH_LEVEL=1-5} 
+<!-- How many levels of folders to document in detail -->
+
+${INCLUDE_FILE_COUNTS=true|false} 
+<!-- Include file count statistics -->
+
+${INCLUDE_GENERATED_FOLDERS=true|false} 
+<!-- Include auto-generated folders -->
+
+${INCLUDE_FILE_PATTERNS=true|false} 
+<!-- Document file naming/location patterns -->
+
+${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES=true|false} 
+<!-- Include file/folder templates for new features -->
+
+## Generated Prompt
+
+"Analyze the project's folder structure and create a comprehensive 'Project_Folders_Structure_Blueprint.md' document that serves as a definitive guide for maintaining consistent code organization. Use the following approach:
+
+### Initial Auto-detection Phase
+
+${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"Begin by scanning the folder structure for key files that identify the project type:
+- Look for solution/project files (.sln, .csproj, .fsproj, .vbproj) to identify .NET projects
+- Check for build files (pom.xml, build.gradle, settings.gradle) for Java projects
+- Identify package.json with dependencies for JavaScript/TypeScript projects
+- Look for specific framework files (angular.json, react-scripts entries, next.config.js)
+- Check for Python project identifiers (requirements.txt, setup.py, pyproject.toml)
+- Examine mobile app identifiers (pubspec.yaml, android/ios folders)
+- Note all technology signatures found and their versions" : 
+"Focus analysis on ${PROJECT_TYPE} project structure"}
+
+${IS_MONOREPO == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"Determine if this is a monorepo by looking for:
+- Multiple distinct projects with their own configuration files
+- Workspace configuration files (lerna.json, nx.json, turborepo.json, etc.)
+- Cross-project references and shared dependency patterns
+- Root-level orchestration scripts and configuration" : ""}
+
+${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"Check for microservices architecture indicators:
+- Multiple service directories with similar/repeated structures
+- Service-specific Dockerfiles or deployment configurations
+- Inter-service communication patterns (APIs, message brokers)
+- Service registry or discovery configuration
+- API gateway configuration files
+- Shared libraries or utilities across services" : ""}
+
+${INCLUDES_FRONTEND == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"Identify frontend components by looking for:
+- Web asset directories (wwwroot, public, dist, static)
+- UI framework files (components, modules, pages)
+- Frontend build configuration (webpack, vite, rollup, etc.)
+- Style sheet organization (CSS, SCSS, styled-components)
+- Static asset organization (images, fonts, icons)" : ""}
+
+### 1. Structural Overview
+
+Provide a high-level overview of the ${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? "detected project type(s)" : PROJECT_TYPE} project's organization principles and folder structure:
+
+- Document the overall architectural approach reflected in the folder structure
+- Identify the main organizational principles (by feature, by layer, by domain, etc.)
+- Note any structural patterns that repeat throughout the codebase
+- Document the rationale behind the structure where it can be inferred
+
+${IS_MONOREPO == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"If detected as a monorepo, explain how the monorepo is organized and the relationship between projects." : 
+IS_MONOREPO ? "Explain how the monorepo is organized and the relationship between projects." : ""}
+
+${INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"If microservices are detected, describe how they are structured and organized." : 
+INCLUDES_MICROSERVICES ? "Describe how the microservices are structured and organized." : ""}
+
+### 2. Directory Visualization
+
+${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "ASCII" ? 
+"Create an ASCII tree representation of the folder hierarchy to depth level ${DEPTH_LEVEL}." : ""}
+
+${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "Markdown List" ? 
+"Use nested markdown lists to represent the folder hierarchy to depth level ${DEPTH_LEVEL}." : ""}
+
+${VISUALIZATION_STYLE == "Table" ? 
+"Create a table with columns for Path, Purpose, Content Types, and Conventions." : ""}
+
+${INCLUDE_GENERATED_FOLDERS ? 
+"Include all folders including generated ones." : 
+"Exclude auto-generated folders like bin/, obj/, node_modules/, etc."}
+
+### 3. Key Directory Analysis
+
+Document each significant directory's purpose, contents, and patterns:
+
+${PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect" ? 
+"For each detected technology, analyze directory structures based on observed usage patterns:" : ""}
+
+${(PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? 
+"#### .NET Project Structure (if detected)
+
+- **Solution Organization**: 
+  - How projects are grouped and related
+  - Solution folder organization patterns
+  - Multi-targeting project patterns
+
+- **Project Organization**:
+  - Internal folder structure patterns
+  - Source code organization approach
+  - Resource organization
+  - Project dependencies and references
+
+- **Domain/Feature Organization**:
+  - How business domains or features are separated
+  - Domain boundary enforcement patterns
+
+- **Layer Organization**:
+  - Separation of concerns (Controllers, Services, Repositories, etc.)
+  - Layer interaction and dependency patterns
+
+- **Configuration Management**:
+  - Configuration file locations and purposes
+  - Environment-specific configurations
+  - Secret management approach
+
+- **Test Project Organization**:
+  - Test project structure and naming
+  - Test categories and organization
+  - Test data and mock locations" : ""}
+
+${(PROJECT_TYPE == "React" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Angular" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? 
+"#### UI Project Structure (if detected)
+
+- **Component Organization**:
+  - Component folder structure patterns
+  - Grouping strategies (by feature, type, etc.)
+  - Shared vs. feature-specific components
+
+- **State Management**:
+  - State-related file organization
+  - Store structure for global state
+  - Local state management patterns
+
+- **Routing Organization**:
+  - Route definition locations
+  - Page/view component organization
+  - Route parameter handling
+
+- **API Integration**:
+  - API client organization
+  - Service layer structure
+  - Data fetching patterns
+
+- **Asset Management**:
+  - Static resource organization
+  - Image/media file structure
+  - Font and icon organization
+  
+- **Style Organization**:
+  - CSS/SCSS file structure
+  - Theme organization
+  - Style module patterns" : ""}
+
+### 4. File Placement Patterns
+
+${INCLUDE_FILE_PATTERNS ? 
+"Document the patterns that determine where different types of files should be placed:
+
+- **Configuration Files**:
+  - Locations for different types of configuration
+  - Environment-specific configuration patterns
+  
+- **Model/Entity Definitions**:
+  - Where domain models are defined
+  - Data transfer object (DTO) locations
+  - Schema definition locations
+  
+- **Business Logic**:
+  - Service implementation locations
+  - Business rule organization
+  - Utility and helper function placement
+  
+- **Interface Definitions**:
+  - Where interfaces and abstractions are defined
+  - How interfaces are grouped and organized
+  
+- **Test Files**:
+  - Unit test location patterns
+  - Integration test placement
+  - Test utility and mock locations
+  
+- **Documentation Files**:
+  - API documentation placement
+  - Internal documentation organization
+  - README file distribution" : 
+"Document where key file types are located in the project."}
+
+### 5. Naming and Organization Conventions
+Document the naming and organizational conventions observed across the project:
+
+- **File Naming Patterns**:
+  - Case conventions (PascalCase, camelCase, kebab-case)
+  - Prefix and suffix patterns
+  - Type indicators in filenames
+  
+- **Folder Naming Patterns**:
+  - Naming conventions for different folder types
+  - Hierarchical naming patterns
+  - Grouping and categorization conventions
+  
+- **Namespace/Module Patterns**:
+  - How namespaces/modules map to folder structure
+  - Import/using statement organization
+  - Internal vs. public API separation
+
+- **Organizational Patterns**:
+  - Code co-location strategies
+  - Feature encapsulation approaches
+  - Cross-cutting concern organization
+
+### 6. Navigation and Development Workflow
+Provide guidance for navigating and working with the codebase structure:
+
+- **Entry Points**:
+  - Main application entry points
+  - Key configuration starting points
+  - Initial files for understanding the project
+
+- **Common Development Tasks**:
+  - Where to add new features
+  - How to extend existing functionality
+  - Where to place new tests
+  - Configuration modification locations
+  
+- **Dependency Patterns**:
+  - How dependencies flow between folders
+  - Import/reference patterns
+  - Dependency injection registration locations
+
+${INCLUDE_FILE_COUNTS ? 
+"- **Content Statistics**:
+  - Files per directory analysis
+  - Code distribution metrics
+  - Complexity concentration areas" : ""}
+
+### 7. Build and Output Organization
+Document the build process and output organization:
+
+- **Build Configuration**:
+  - Build script locations and purposes
+  - Build pipeline organization
+  - Build task definitions
+  
+- **Output Structure**:
+  - Compiled/built output locations
+  - Output organization patterns
+  - Distribution package structure
+  
+- **Environment-Specific Builds**:
+  - Development vs. production differences
+  - Environment configuration strategies
+  - Build variant organization
+
+### 8. Technology-Specific Organization
+
+${(PROJECT_TYPE == ".NET" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? 
+"#### .NET-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
+
+- **Project File Organization**:
+  - Project file structure and patterns
+  - Target framework configuration
+  - Property group organization
+  - Item group patterns
+  
+- **Assembly Organization**:
+  - Assembly naming patterns
+  - Multi-assembly architecture
+  - Assembly reference patterns
+  
+- **Resource Organization**:
+  - Embedded resource patterns
+  - Localization file structure
+  - Static web asset organization
+  
+- **Package Management**:
+  - NuGet configuration locations
+  - Package reference organization
+  - Package version management" : ""}
+
+${(PROJECT_TYPE == "Java" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? 
+"#### Java-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
+
+- **Package Hierarchy**:
+  - Package naming and nesting conventions
+  - Domain vs. technical packages
+  - Visibility and access patterns
+  
+- **Build Tool Organization**:
+  - Maven/Gradle structure patterns
+  - Module organization
+  - Plugin configuration patterns
+  
+- **Resource Organization**:
+  - Resource folder structures
+  - Environment-specific resources
+  - Properties file organization" : ""}
+
+${(PROJECT_TYPE == "Node.js" || PROJECT_TYPE == "Auto-detect") ? 
+"#### Node.js-Specific Structure Patterns (if detected)
+
+- **Module Organization**:
+  - CommonJS vs. ESM organization
+  - Internal module patterns
+  - Third-party dependency management
+  
+- **Script Organization**:
+  - npm/yarn script definition patterns
+  - Utility script locations
+  - Development tool scripts
+  
+- **Configuration Management**:
+  - Configuration file locations
+  - Environment variable management
+  - Secret management approaches" : ""}
+
+### 9. Extension and Evolution
+Document how the project structure is designed to be extended:
+
+- **Extension Points**:
+  - How to add new modules/features while maintaining conventions
+  - Plugin/extension folder patterns
+  - Customization directory structures
+  
+- **Scalability Patterns**:
+  - How the structure scales for larger features
+  - Approach for breaking down large modules
+  - Code splitting strategies
+  
+- **Refactoring Patterns**:
+  - Common refactoring approaches observed
+  - How structural changes are managed
+  - Incremental reorganization patterns
+
+${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES ? 
+"### 10. Structure Templates
+
+Provide templates for creating new components that follow project conventions:
+
+- **New Feature Template**:
+  - Folder structure for adding a complete feature
+  - Required file types and their locations
+  - Naming patterns to follow
+  
+- **New Component Template**:
+  - Directory structure for a typical component
+  - Essential files to include
+  - Integration points with existing structure
+  
+- **New Service Template**:
+  - Structure for adding a new service
+  - Interface and implementation placement
+  - Configuration and registration patterns
+  
+- **New Test Structure**:
+  - Folder structure for test projects/files
+  - Test file organization templates
+  - Test resource organization" : ""}
+
+### ${INCLUDE_TEMPLATES ? "11" : "10"}. Structure Enforcement
+
+Document how the project structure is maintained and enforced:
+
+- **Structure Validation**:
+  - Tools/scripts that enforce structure
+  - Build checks for structural compliance
+  - Linting rules related to structure
+  
+- **Documentation Practices**:
+  - How structural changes are documented
+  - Where architectural decisions are recorded
+  - Structure evolution history
+
+Include a section at the end about maintaining this blueprint and when it was last updated.
+"

package/assets/prompts/gen-specs-as-issues.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+---
+description: 'This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.'
+mode: 'agent'
+---
+
+# Product Manager Assistant: Feature Identification and Specification
+
+This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.
+
+## 1. Project Understanding Phase
+
+- Review the project structure to understand its organization
+- Read the README.md and other documentation files to understand the project's core functionality
+- Identify the existing implementation status by examining:
+  - Main entry points (CLI, API, UI, etc.)
+  - Core modules and their functionality
+  - Tests to understand expected behavior
+  - Any placeholder implementations
+
+**Guiding Questions:**
+- What is the primary purpose of this project?
+- What user problems does it solve?
+- What patterns exist in the current implementation?
+- Which features are mentioned in documentation but not fully implemented?
+
+## 2. Gap Analysis Phase
+
+- Compare the documented capabilities ONLY against the actual implementation
+- Identify "placeholder" code that lacks real functionality
+- Look for features mentioned in documentation but missing robust implementation
+- Consider the user journey and identify broken or missing steps
+- Focus on core functionality first (not nice-to-have features)
+
+**Output Creation:**
+- Create a list of potential missing features (5-7 items)
+- For each feature, note:
+  - Current implementation status
+  - References in documentation
+  - Impact on user experience if missing
+
+## 3. Prioritization Phase
+
+- Apply a score to each identified gap:
+
+**Scoring Matrix (1-5 scale):**
+- User Impact: How many users benefit?
+- Strategic Alignment: Fits core mission?
+- Implementation Feasibility: Technical complexity?
+- Resource Requirements: Development effort needed?
+- Risk Level: Potential negative impacts?
+
+**Priority = (User Impact × Strategic Alignment) / (Implementation Effort × Risk Level)**
+
+**Output Creation:**
+- Present the top 3 highest-priority missing features based on the scoring
+- For each, provide:
+  - Feature name
+  - Current status
+  - Impact if not implemented
+  - Dependencies on other features
+
+## 4. Specification Development Phase
+
+- For each prioritized feature, develop a detailed but practical specification:
+  - Begin with the philosophical approach: simplicity over complexity
+  - Focus on MVP functionality first
+  - Consider the developer experience
+  - Keep the specification implementation-friendly
+
+**For Each Feature Specification:**
+1. **Overview & Scope**
+   - What problem does it solve?
+   - What's included and what's explicitly excluded?
+
+2. **Technical Requirements**
+   - Core functionality needed
+   - User-facing interfaces (API, UI, CLI, etc.)
+   - Integration points with existing code
+
+3. **Implementation Plan**
+   - Key modules/files to create or modify
+   - Simple code examples showing the approach
+   - Clear data structures and interfaces
+
+4. **Acceptance Criteria**
+   - How will we know when it's done?
+   - What specific functionality must work?
+   - What tests should pass?
+
+## 5. GitHub Issue Creation Phase
+
+- For each specification, create a GitHub issue:
+  - Clear, descriptive title
+  - Comprehensive specification in the body
+  - Appropriate labels (enhancement, high-priority, etc.)
+  - Explicitly mention MVP philosophy where relevant
+
+**Issue Template Structure:**
+
+# [Feature Name]
+
+## Overview
+[Brief description of the feature and its purpose]
+
+## Scope
+[What's included and what's explicitly excluded]
+
+## Technical Requirements
+[Specific technical needs and constraints]
+
+## Implementation Plan
+[Step-by-step approach with simple code examples]
+
+## Acceptance Criteria
+[Clear list of requirements to consider the feature complete]
+
+## Priority
+[Justification for prioritization]
+
+## Dependencies
+- **Blocks:** [List of issues blocked by this one]
+- **Blocked by:** [List of issues this one depends on]
+
+## Implementation Size
+- **Estimated effort:** [Small/Medium/Large]
+- **Sub-issues:** [Links to sub-issues if this is a parent issue]
+
+
+## 5.5 Work Distribution Optimization
+
+- **Independence Analysis**
+  - Review each specification to identify truly independent components
+  - Refactor specifications to maximize independent work streams
+  - Create clear boundaries between interdependent components
+
+- **Dependency Mapping**
+  - For features with unavoidable dependencies, establish clear issue hierarchies
+  - Create parent issues for the overall feature with sub-issues for components
+  - Explicitly document "blocked by" and "blocks" relationships
+
+- **Workload Balancing**
+  - Break down large specifications into smaller, manageable sub-issues
+  - Ensure each sub-issue represents 1-3 days of development work
+  - Include sub-issue specific acceptance criteria
+
+**Implementation Guidelines:**
+- Use GitHub issue linking syntax to create explicit relationships
+- Add labels to indicate dependency status (e.g., "blocked", "prerequisite")
+- Include estimated complexity/effort for each issue to aid sprint planning
+
+## 6. Final Review Phase
+
+- Summarize all created specifications
+- Highlight implementation dependencies between features
+- Suggest a logical implementation order
+- Note any potential challenges or considerations
+
+Remember throughout this process:
+- Favor simplicity over complexity
+- Start with minimal viable implementations that work
+- Focus on developer experience
+- Build a foundation that can be extended later
+- Consider the open-source community and contribution model
+
+This workflow embodiment of our approach should help maintain consistency in how features are specified and prioritized, ensuring that software projects evolve in a thoughtful, user-centered way.