wize-dev-kit 0.3.1 → 0.4.0

package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-technical-research/workflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+---
+code: wize-technical-research
+name: Technical Research
+phase: 1-analysis
+owner: wize-agent-analyst   # Pepper Potts
+status: ready
+---
+
+# Technical Research
+
+**Goal.** Conduct technical research on technologies, tools, and architecture patterns to inform stack decisions.
+
+Pepper Potts drives. Tony Stark consumes the output directly. Peggy Carter edits prose.
+
+Output lands in `.wize/planning/research/technical-{slug}-research-{date}.md`.
+
+## When to use
+
+- "Should we use X or Y?"
+- "What is the current state of Z technology?"
+- "I need a technical comparison of..."
+
+## Inputs
+
+- Open questions from `.wize/planning/brief.md` or `.wize/planning/tech-vision.md`
+- User-provided technology or architectural topic
+- Web search access
+
+## Outputs
+
+- `.wize/planning/research/technical-{slug}-research-{date}.md`
+
+## Workflow architecture
+
+Step-file architecture with six steps:
+
+1. Scope confirmation
+2. Technical overview
+3. Integration patterns
+4. Architectural patterns
+5. Implementation research
+6. Research synthesis
+
+## On activation
+
+1. Load `.wize/config/project.toml` and `.wize/config/user.toml`.
+2. Ask for the technical topic if not provided.
+3. Derive `{research_topic_slug}` and create the output file from `research.template.md`.
+4. Read fully and follow `./technical-steps/step-01-init.md`.
+
+## Hand-off
+
+> Technical research is in `.wize/planning/research/`. Fury and Tony can use it for stack family decisions; open questions route back to Wizer.

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/architecture-decision-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+---
+status: draft
+owner: Tony Stark
+created: "{{created}}"
+stepsCompleted: []
+inputDocuments: []
+---
+
+# Architecture — {{project_name}}
+
+## Summary
+
+{{One paragraph: stack family, runtime, primary data store, deploy target. The frame.}}
+
+## Stack
+
+- Language:
+- Front-end:
+- Back-end:
+- DB:
+- Auth:
+- Hosting:
+- Observability:
+- Test:
+
+## Components
+
+| Component | Responsibility | Boundary |
+|---|---|---|
+
+## Data model
+
+## Sequences
+
+## Cross-cutting concerns
+
+## NFR check
+
+## ADRs
+
+See `.wize/solutioning/adrs/`.

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/customize.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Wize Dev Kit — overrides for the built-in workflow "wize-create-architecture".
+# DO NOT EDIT in the installed kit; copy to .wize/custom/workflows/wize-create-architecture/
+# for project-level overrides.
+
+[workflow]
+
+# Steps to run before standard activation (config load, greet).
+activation_steps_prepend = []
+
+# Steps to run after greet but before the workflow begins.
+activation_steps_append = []
+
+# Persistent facts the workflow keeps in mind for the whole run.
+persistent_facts = [
+  "file:{project-root}/.wize/knowledge/document-project/conventions.md",
+]
+
+# Scalar executed when Step 8 (Architecture Completion & Handoff) finishes.
+# Override wins. Leave empty for no custom post-completion behavior.
+on_complete = ""

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-01-init.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# Step 1: Architecture Workflow Initialization
+
+## Mandatory execution rules
+
+- 🛑 Never generate content without user input.
+- 📖 Always read the complete step file before acting.
+- ✅ Treat this as collaborative discovery between architectural peers.
+- 💬 Focus on initialization and setup only.
+- 🚪 Detect existing workflow state and handle continuation properly.
+- ⚠️ No time estimates.
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`; write artifacts in `{document_output_language}`.
+
+## Execution protocols
+
+- 🎯 Show analysis before taking action.
+- 💾 Initialize the document and update frontmatter.
+- 📖 Set `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading the next step.
+- 🚫 Do not load the next step until setup is complete and the user confirms.
+
+## Context boundaries
+
+- Variables from `workflow.md` are available.
+- Previous context is what is in the output document + frontmatter.
+- Input document discovery happens in this step.
+
+## Task
+
+Initialize the Architecture workflow by detecting continuation state, discovering input documents, and setting up the document for collaborative architectural decision making.
+
+## Initialization sequence
+
+### 1. Check for existing workflow
+
+Check if `{output_folder}/solutioning/architecture.md` exists.
+
+- If it exists and has frontmatter with `stepsCompleted`, stop here and load `./step-01b-continue.md`.
+- If it exists but has no `stepsCompleted`, treat it as a legacy document: warn the user and offer to continue from it or start fresh.
+- If it does not exist, this is a fresh workflow.
+
+### 2. Discover input documents
+
+Search in `{output_folder}/planning/`, `{output_folder}/knowledge/`, and `{project-root}/docs/` for:
+
+- Product Brief (`*brief*.md`)
+- PRD (`*prd*.md`)
+- UX Scenarios / UX Design (`*ux*.md`)
+- Research (`*research*.md`)
+- Project Context (`**/project-context.md`)
+
+Confirm what was found with the user before proceeding.
+
+### 3. Validate required inputs
+
+If no PRD is found:
+
+> Architecture requires a PRD to work from. Please run `wize-create-prd` first or provide the PRD file path.
+
+Do not proceed without a PRD.
+
+### 4. Create initial document
+
+Copy `../architecture-decision-template.md` to `{output_folder}/solutioning/architecture.md`.
+
+Set frontmatter:
+
+```yaml
+status: draft
+owner: Tony Stark
+created: "{{date}}"
+stepsCompleted: []
+inputDocuments: [{{list of discovered files}}]
+```
+
+### 5. Report setup to user
+
+```
+Welcome {{user_name}}! I've set up your Architecture workspace for {{project_name}}.
+
+Documents found:
+- PRD: {count or "None — required"}
+- UX Design: {count or "None"}
+- Research: {count or "None"}
+- Project docs: {count or "None"}
+- Project context: {count of rules or "None"}
+
+Files loaded: {list or "No additional documents"}
+
+Ready to begin architectural decision making. Do you have any other documents you'd like to include?
+
+[C] Continue to project context analysis
+```
+
+## Next step
+
+After the user selects [C], load `./step-02-context.md`.

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-01b-continue.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Step 1b: Continue Existing Architecture Workflow
+
+## Purpose
+
+Resume an architecture workflow that was previously started.
+
+## Rules
+
+- Read the existing `{output_folder}/solutioning/architecture.md` fully, including frontmatter.
+- Report the current `stepsCompleted` to the user.
+- Ask whether to continue from the last completed step or restart from a specific step.
+- Never discard already-written content without explicit user confirmation.
+
+## Continue menu
+
+```
+Existing architecture document found.
+
+Steps completed: {stepsCompleted}
+Last saved: {updated or created date}
+
+What would you like to do?
+[C] Continue from the next step ({next_step})
+[R] Restart from step 1
+[S] Pick a specific step to revisit
+```
+
+## Routing
+
+- [C] → load the step immediately after the highest value in `stepsCompleted`.
+- [R] → confirm overwrite risk, then return to `step-01-init.md` fresh setup.
+- [S] → present the list of steps and load the selected one.

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-02-context.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# Step 2: Project Context Analysis
+
+## Mandatory execution rules
+
+- 🛑 Never generate content without user input.
+- 📖 Always read the complete step file before acting.
+- ✅ Treat this as collaborative discovery.
+- 🎯 Analyze loaded documents; don't assume or generate requirements.
+- ⚠️ No time estimates.
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`; write artifacts in `{document_output_language}`.
+
+## Execution protocols
+
+- 🎯 Show analysis before taking action.
+- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating project context analysis.
+- 💾 Only save when the user chooses C (Continue).
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading the next step.
+- 🚫 Do not load the next step until C is selected.
+
+## Collaboration menu (A/P/C)
+
+- **A (Advanced Elicitation)** — invoke `wize-advanced-elicitation` for deeper architectural implications.
+- **P (Party Mode)** — invoke `wize-party-mode` to bring Tony, Fury, and Pepper into the conversation.
+- **C (Continue)** — save the content and proceed.
+
+After A or P, return to this menu.
+
+## Context boundaries
+
+- Current document and frontmatter from step 1 are available.
+- Input documents are loaded.
+- Focus on architectural implications only — no technology decisions yet.
+
+## Task
+
+Analyze the loaded project documents to understand architectural scope, requirements, and constraints.
+
+## Analysis sequence
+
+### 1. Review project requirements
+
+**From PRD:**
+
+- Extract functional requirements and their architectural implications.
+- Identify non-functional requirements (performance, security, compliance).
+- Note technical constraints or dependencies.
+
+**From Epics/Stories (if available):**
+
+- Map epic structure to architectural components.
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns that span multiple epics.
+
+**From UX Design (if available):**
+
+- Component complexity, real-time needs, platform-specific UI, accessibility level, responsive breakpoints, offline capability.
+
+### 2. Project scale assessment
+
+Complexity indicators:
+
+- Real-time features
+- Multi-tenancy
+- Regulatory compliance
+- Integration density
+- User interaction complexity
+- Data complexity and volume
+
+### 3. Reflect understanding to the user
+
+Present a concise summary:
+
+```
+I'm reviewing your project documentation for {{project_name}}.
+
+I see {{fr_count}} functional requirements and {{nfr_count}} non-functional requirements.
+{epics_loaded?}I also see {{epic_count}} epics with {{story_count}} stories.{/epics_loaded?}
+{ux_loaded?}A UX specification is present.{/ux_loaded?}
+
+Key architectural aspects:
+- [core functionality]
+- [critical NFRs]
+- [unique technical challenges]
+- [compliance requirements]
+
+Scale indicators:
+- Complexity: [low/medium/high/enterprise]
+- Primary domain: [web/mobile/api/backend/full-stack/etc]
+- Cross-cutting concerns: [list]
+
+Does this match your understanding?
+```
+
+### 4. Generate project context content
+
+Prepare the section to append:
+
+```markdown
+## Project Context Analysis
+
+### Requirements Overview
+
+**Functional Requirements:**
+{{analysis}}
+
+**Non-Functional Requirements:**
+{{analysis}}
+
+**Scale & Complexity:**
+- Primary domain: {{domain}}
+- Complexity level: {{level}}
+- Estimated architectural components: {{count}}
+
+### Technical Constraints & Dependencies
+{{list}}
+
+### Cross-Cutting Concerns Identified
+{{list}}
+```
+
+### 5. Present content and menu
+
+Show the drafted content and present A/P/C. Only append when the user chooses C.
+
+## Next step
+
+After C, load `./step-03-starter.md`.

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-03-starter.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+# Step 3: Starter Template Evaluation
+
+## Mandatory execution rules
+
+- 🛑 Never generate content without user input.
+- ✅ Treat this as collaborative discovery.
+- 🌐 Search the web to verify current versions and options.
+- ⚠️ No time estimates.
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`; write artifacts in `{document_output_language}`.
+
+## Execution protocols
+
+- 🎯 Show analysis before taking action.
+- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after starter analysis.
+- 💾 Only save when the user chooses C.
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading the next step.
+
+## Collaboration menu (A/P/C)
+
+- **A (Advanced Elicitation)** — explore unconventional starter options.
+- **P (Party Mode)** — evaluate starter trade-offs from multiple perspectives.
+- **C (Continue)** — save and move to architectural decisions.
+
+## Context boundaries
+
+- Project context from step 2 is available.
+- No architectural decisions made yet — this step evaluates foundations.
+
+## Task
+
+Discover technical preferences and evaluate starter template options, establishing solid architectural foundations.
+
+## Starter evaluation sequence
+
+### 0. Check existing technical preferences
+
+If `.wize/knowledge/document-project/conventions.md` or `project-context.md` exist, surface any already-documented technical rules.
+
+### 1. Discover user technical preferences
+
+Ask about:
+
+- Languages and frameworks
+- Databases
+- Cloud / hosting / deployment
+- Third-party services (auth, payments, analytics)
+- Team experience level
+
+### 2. Identify primary technology domain
+
+Map the project to one of:
+
+- Web application
+- Mobile app
+- API / backend
+- CLI tool
+- Full-stack
+- Desktop
+
+### 3. Research current starter options
+
+Search the web for current, maintained starter templates matching the domain.
+
+### 4. Present starter options
+
+For each viable starter, document:
+
+- Technology decisions already made by the starter
+- Architectural patterns established
+- Development experience features
+- Maintenance status
+
+### 5. Get selection
+
+Present a recommended starter and ask for confirmation.
+
+### 6. Generate starter content
+
+Append to `architecture.md`:
+
+```markdown
+## Starter Template Evaluation
+
+### Primary Technology Domain
+{{domain}}
+
+### Starter Options Considered
+{{analysis}}
+
+### Selected Starter: {{starter_name}}
+
+**Rationale:** {{why}}
+
+**Initialization Command:**
+```bash
+{{command}}
+```
+
+**Architectural Decisions Provided by Starter:**
+- Language & Runtime: ...
+- Styling Solution: ...
+- Build Tooling: ...
+- Testing Framework: ...
+- Code Organization: ...
+- Development Experience: ...
+```
+
+## Next step
+
+After C, load `./step-04-decisions.md`.

package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-04-decisions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+# Step 4: Core Architectural Decisions
+
+## Mandatory execution rules
+
+- 🛑 Never generate content without user input.
+- ✅ Treat this as collaborative discovery between peers.
+- 🌐 Search the web to verify current technology versions.
+- ⚠️ No time estimates.
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`; write artifacts in `{document_output_language}`.
+
+## Execution protocols
+
+- 🎯 Show analysis before taking action.
+- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after each major decision category.
+- 💾 Only save when the user chooses C.
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before loading the next step.
+
+## Collaboration menu (A/P/C)
+
+- **A (Advanced Elicitation)** — explore innovative approaches to a specific decision.
+- **P (Party Mode)** — review trade-offs from multiple perspectives.
+- **C (Continue)** — save current decisions and proceed.
+
+## Context boundaries
+
+- Project context from step 2 is available.
+- Starter template choice from step 3 is available.
+- Focus on decisions not already made by the starter or existing preferences.
+
+## Task
+
+Facilitate collaborative architectural decision making for the remaining critical choices.
+
+## Decision categories
+
+### Category 1: Data Architecture
+
+- Database choice (if not determined by starter)
+- Data modeling approach
+- Validation strategy
+- Migration approach
+- Caching strategy
+
+### Category 2: Authentication & Security
+
+- Authentication method
+- Authorization patterns
+- Security middleware
+- Encryption approach
+- API security strategy
+
+### Category 3: API & Communication
+
+- API design patterns (REST, GraphQL, tRPC, etc.)
+- Error handling standards
+- Rate limiting
+- Inter-service communication
+
+### Category 4: Frontend Architecture (if applicable)
+
+- State management
+- Component architecture
+- Routing
+- Performance optimization
+
+### Category 5: Infrastructure & Deployment
+
+- Hosting strategy
+- CI/CD approach
+- Environment configuration
+- Monitoring and logging
+- Scaling strategy
+
+## Decision format
+
+For each decision, record:
+
+- Category
+- Decision
+- Version (if applicable)
+- Rationale
+- Affects (components or epics)
+- Provided by starter? (yes/no)
+
+## Generate decisions content
+
+Append to `architecture.md`:
+
+```markdown
+## Core Architectural Decisions
+
+### Decision Priority Analysis
+
+**Critical Decisions (block implementation):**
+{{list}}
+
+**Important Decisions (shape architecture):**
+{{list}}
+
+**Deferred Decisions (post-MVP):**
+{{list}}
+
+### Data Architecture
+...
+
+### Authentication & Security
+...
+
+### API & Communication Patterns
+...
+
+### Frontend Architecture
+...
+
+### Infrastructure & Deployment
+...
+
+### Decision Impact Analysis
+
+**Implementation Sequence:**
+{{ordered list}}
+
+**Cross-Component Dependencies:**
+{{how decisions affect each other}}
+```
+
+## Next step
+
+After C, load `./step-05-patterns.md`.