wize-dev-kit 0.10.1 → 0.12.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/AGENTS.md +3 -3
- package/CHANGELOG.md +48 -0
- package/README.es.md +1 -1
- package/README.md +1 -1
- package/README.pt-BR.md +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/app-overlay/wize-app-release-channels/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/app-overlay/wize-app-scaffold/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/app-overlay/wize-app-store-listing/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/builder-skills/wize-create-agent/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/builder-skills/wize-create-skill/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/builder-skills/wize-create-workflow/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-advanced-elicitation/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-brainstorming/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-customize/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-editorial-review-prose/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-editorial-review-structure/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-grill/skill.md +3 -1
- package/src/core-skills/wize-index-docs/skill.md +3 -1
- package/src/core-skills/wize-review-adversarial/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-review-edge-case-hunter/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-shard-doc/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/core-skills/wize-spec/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-agent-analyst/agent.yaml +3 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-document-project/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-domain-research/workflow.md +7 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-market-research/workflow.md +7 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-prfaq/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-product-brief/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-refresh-knowledge/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-research/workflow.md +24 -89
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-technical-research/workflow.md +7 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-trigger-map/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-create-prd/workflow.md +3 -2
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-edit-prd/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-ux-design/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-ux-scenarios/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-validate-prd/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-02-context.md +1 -1
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md +1 -1
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md +7 -6
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-design-system/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-nfr-principles/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-project-context/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-tech-vision/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-changelog/workflow.md +184 -0
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-checkpoint-preview/workflow.md +8 -6
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-code-review/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-correct-course/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-create-story/workflow.md +7 -13
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-dev-story/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-investigate/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-quick-dev/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-release/workflow.md +162 -0
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-retrospective/workflow.md +7 -5
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-sprint-planning/workflow.md +11 -6
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-sprint-status/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/method-skills/module.yaml +12 -3
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/module.yaml +4 -1
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize/skill.md +164 -0
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize-help/skill.md +127 -6
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize-onboarding/workflow.md +3 -1
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize-orchestrator/agent.yaml +1 -0
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize-orchestrator/persona.md +29 -4
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize-party-mode/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/_shared/backlog.js +3 -14
- package/src/security-overlay/_shared/scope-parser.js +27 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/agents/red-teamer/agent.yaml +2 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/agents/red-teamer/persona.md +6 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/skills/wize-sec-enumerate/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/skills/wize-sec-pentest/scripts/run-pipeline.js +18 -1
- package/src/security-overlay/skills/wize-sec-pentest/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/skills/wize-sec-recon/skill.md +2 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/skills/wize-sec-scope/scripts/generate-scope.js +106 -0
- package/src/security-overlay/skills/wize-sec-scope/skill.md +52 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-qa-generate-e2e-tests/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-design/workflow.md +3 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-gate/workflow.md +3 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-nfr/workflow.md +3 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-review/workflow.md +3 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-risk/workflow.md +3 -0
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-trace/workflow.md +3 -0
- package/src/web-overlay/wize-web-deploy/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/web-overlay/wize-web-scaffold/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/src/web-overlay/wize-web-seo-audit/workflow.md +2 -0
- package/tools/installer/commands/doctor.js +2 -2
- package/tools/installer/onboarding.js +14 -21
- package/tools/installer/render-shared.js +50 -28
- package/tools/installer/validators/run-all.js +3 -2
- package/tools/installer/wize-cli.js +323 -77
package/AGENTS.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Treat `.wize/`, this `AGENTS.md`, and the installed `wize-*` skills as your oper
|
|
|
10
10
|
instructions and persistent memory — not background reading. Read project state before
|
|
11
11
|
acting; write what you change back into `.wize/` so the next session inherits it.
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
Before editing, classify the demand via `/wize-help
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
13
|
+
Before editing, classify the demand via `/wize` (or `/wize-help`): **Quick Dev** (small, predictable,
|
|
14
|
+
trivially scoped, no new feature / architecture / UX / security) or **Full Lifecycle**. Never pick
|
|
15
15
|
Quick Dev just to skip artifacts.
|
|
16
16
|
|
|
17
17
|
When a skill fans out to subagents, match the model tier to the task: a lightweight tier
|
|
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ decisions, or final adversarial review.
|
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
35
|
## Where to start
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
Activate the orchestrator: `wize-
|
|
37
|
+
Activate the orchestrator: `/wize` (or `/wize-help`). Wizer will guide you.
|
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,6 +9,54 @@ Format inspired by [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/).
|
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
## [Unreleased]
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
+
## [0.12.0] — 2026-08-08
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
**Intent-first UX overhaul (Epic 09).** The kit now routes by user intent, not just by lifecycle phase. 10 stories across 3 sprints: block-scalar parser fix, intent descriptions on all 68 skills, 56-entry intent routing table, `/wize` primary alias, onboarding one-liner, research dispatcher, `--sign-scope`, non-interactive install + honest uninstall, release/changelog skills, CI on push/PR. Suite green (532 tests, validate 78 files).
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### Added
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- **`/wize` alias** — primary entry point; `/wize-help` remains canonical. Onboarding reduced to `→ /wize`.
|
|
19
|
+
- **Intent routing table** — 56 intent phrases mapped to skills in `wize-help` (e.g., "concorrência" → `wize-market-research`). Falls back to phase heuristic only when ambiguous.
|
|
20
|
+
- **Intent descriptions** — all 68 skills/workflows carry a one-sentence `description:` telling the harness WHEN to invoke them. Block-scalar parser (`|`, `>`) now supported.
|
|
21
|
+
- **`wize-sec-scope`** — guided scope creation for the security overlay (4 questions → `scope.md` + signed hash).
|
|
22
|
+
- **`--sign-scope`** flag on `wize-sec-pentest` — recomputes SHA-256 without manual editing.
|
|
23
|
+
- **Non-interactive install** — `install --profiles core,security --targets claude-code --yes` for CI/scripted installs. `--dry-run` supported.
|
|
24
|
+
- **Honest uninstall** — removes rendered adapter directories (`.claude/skills/`, `.cursor/rules/`, etc.) in addition to `.wize/`. `--dry-run` supported.
|
|
25
|
+
- **`wize-release`** skill — version bump + changelog + git tag from gated stories.
|
|
26
|
+
- **`wize-changelog`** skill — Keep a Changelog format generated from done stories.
|
|
27
|
+
- **CI workflow** — `.github/workflows/ci.yml` runs `npm test` + `npm run validate` on push/PR against Node 20.x and 22.x.
|
|
28
|
+
- **Tool contract tests** — smoke tests for nmap, gitleaks, osv-scanner, grype, nuclei, nikto, sqlmap, ffuf (skip if absent, catch CLI drift).
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### Changed
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
- **`wize-research`** — now a dispatcher that classifies intent and delegates to `wize-market-research`, `wize-domain-research`, or `wize-technical-research`.
|
|
33
|
+
- **Phase labels** — normalized across all workflows (`2-plan-workflows` → `2-plan`, `2-to-3-boundary` → `3-solutioning`).
|
|
34
|
+
- **Onboarding** — contextual one-liner (`→ /wize`) instead of multi-line menu. Detects brownfield/security-overlay.
|
|
35
|
+
- **AGENTS.md template** — references `/wize` as primary, `/wize-help` as canonical.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### Fixed
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- **Block scalar parser** — `readFrontmatter` now handles `|`, `>`, `|-`, `|+`, `|2` and chomp indicators. Fixes the `— |` bug that corrupted all 10 persona descriptions.
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## [0.11.0] — 2026-08-06
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
**No-estimates policy.** The method now refuses to produce development estimates at any step — no hours, days, story points, or S/M/L/XL t-shirt sizes. Following the BMAD stance already stated in the architecture skill ("AI development speed has fundamentally changed"), estimates are treated as noise that only burns time and tokens. The only sizing signal that remains is binary: **does a story fit one PR? If not, slice it.** Suite green (417 tests, validate 74 files).
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### Removed
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
- **`estimate` frontmatter field** from the story and epic templates (`wize-create-story`, `wize-create-epics-and-stories`).
|
|
48
|
+
- **`estimateFor()`** helper and the `- **Estimativa:**` / `est S|M|L` output from the security remediation backlog (`security-overlay/_shared/backlog.js`) — the red-teamer's remediation epics/stories no longer carry a size estimate.
|
|
49
|
+
- **"Estimation rough guide"** (S ≤ 4h, M 4h–1d, …) from `wize-create-story`.
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Changed
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
- **INVEST** — the "Estimable" letter is dropped on purpose across `wize-create-prd`, `wize-validate-prd`, `wize-create-story`, and `wize-create-epics-and-stories`. "Small (≤ 1 PR)" is now the only sizing test.
|
|
54
|
+
- **`wize-sprint-planning`** — planning is by story count and priority, not velocity or person-day math; "Optimistic velocity" anti-pattern replaced with "don't estimate."
|
|
55
|
+
- **`wize-retrospective`** — the dashboard reports stories committed vs shipped (a count) instead of velocity; the example retro no longer references M/L estimates.
|
|
56
|
+
- **`wize-checkpoint-preview`** — the snapshot records "Commits so far" instead of "Time spent"; triggers refer to "larger stories," not "M/L stories."
|
|
57
|
+
- **`wize-help`** — the Quick Dev classifier drops the "~≤1h" time threshold; it now reads "trivially scoped."
|
|
58
|
+
- Each affected skill carries an explicit **"No estimates"** note so the rule holds when the skill is loaded standalone.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
12
60
|
## [0.10.1] — 2026-08-02
|
|
13
61
|
|
|
14
62
|
Documentation polish + tooling fixes. The security-overlay persona gets a Marvel name; the README (3 languages) is aligned to v0.10.1; a rendering bug and the test glob are fixed; CI is added. Suite green (418 tests — the security-overlay suite now runs under `npm test`).
|
package/README.es.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ npx wize-dev-kit version # imprime la versión instalada del kit
|
|
|
250
250
|
|
|
251
251
|
## Estado
|
|
252
252
|
|
|
253
|
-
**v0.
|
|
253
|
+
**v0.11.0 — beta.** El método nunca produce estimaciones de desarrollo — ni horas, ni puntos, ni tallas de camiseta; una story se dimensiona solo por si cabe en un único PR. El ciclo completo (análisis → plan → solución → implementación) está montado con 10 agentes y una biblioteca estructurada de skills. Los releases recientes suman **contratos de misión** (`/wize-help mission` emite un contrato lleno de objetivo / fuentes de verdad / alcance / ACs / contrato de validación para la persona ejecutora), **`wize-grill`** (una pasada de entrevista hasta entendimiento compartido antes de cualquier paso de autoría) y **loop verification** en `wize-dev-story` (un loop de implementación auto-verificable con guarda de max-cycles que escala a `wize-correct-course`). El `security-overlay` (Pentester de IA) entrega un pipeline de pentest completo, un informe ejecutivo (puntuación de riesgo + briefing + plan de acción por IA) y planificación de remediación post-scan — validado de principio a fin contra una aplicación Laravel/PHP real. Los adapters de IDE para Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex, Continue, Kimi Code, OpenCode y Antigravity se regeneran automáticamente — [OpenCode](docs/harnesses/opencode.md) recibe wiring nativo de `mode`/`agent`/`subtask`, la integración más profunda de las 9.
|
|
254
254
|
|
|
255
255
|
---
|
|
256
256
|
|
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ npx wize-dev-kit version # print the installed kit version
|
|
|
245
245
|
|
|
246
246
|
## Status
|
|
247
247
|
|
|
248
|
-
**v0.
|
|
248
|
+
**v0.11.0 — beta.** The method never produces development estimates — no hours, points, or t-shirt sizes; a story is sized only by whether it fits a single PR. The full lifecycle (analysis → plan → solution → implementation) is wired with 10 agents and a structured skill library. Recent releases add **mission contracts** (`/wize-help mission` emits a filled objective / sources-of-truth / scope / ACs / validation contract for the executing persona), **`wize-grill`** (an interview-to-shared-understanding pass before any authoring step), and **loop verification** in `wize-dev-story` (a self-checking implementation loop with a max-cycles guard that escalates to `wize-correct-course`). The `security-overlay` (AI Pentester) ships a complete pentest pipeline, a stakeholder report (risk score + briefing + AI action plan), and post-scan remediation planning — validated end-to-end against a real Laravel/PHP app. IDE adapters for Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex, Continue, Kimi Code, OpenCode, and Antigravity are regenerated automatically — [OpenCode](docs/harnesses/opencode.md) gets native `mode`/`agent`/`subtask` wiring, the deepest integration of the 9.
|
|
249
249
|
|
|
250
250
|
---
|
|
251
251
|
|
package/README.pt-BR.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ npx wize-dev-kit version # imprime a versão instalada do kit
|
|
|
248
248
|
|
|
249
249
|
## Status
|
|
250
250
|
|
|
251
|
-
**v0.
|
|
251
|
+
**v0.11.0 — beta.** O método nunca produz estimativas de desenvolvimento — nada de horas, pontos ou tamanhos de camiseta; uma story é dimensionada apenas por caber (ou não) em um único PR. O ciclo completo (análise → plano → solução → implementação) está montado com 10 agentes e uma biblioteca estruturada de skills. Releases recentes adicionam **contratos de missão** (`/wize-help mission` emite um contrato preenchido de objetivo / fontes de verdade / escopo / ACs / validação para a persona executora), **`wize-grill`** (uma passagem de entrevista até entendimento compartilhado antes de qualquer passo de autoria) e **loop verification** no `wize-dev-story` (loop de implementação auto-verificável com guarda de max-cycles que escala para `wize-correct-course`). O `security-overlay` (Pentester de IA) entrega um pipeline de pentest completo, um relatório executivo (score de risco + briefing + plano de ação por IA) e planejamento de correção pós-scan — validado de ponta a ponta contra uma aplicação Laravel/PHP real. Os adapters de IDE para Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex, Continue, Kimi Code, OpenCode e Antigravity são regenerados automaticamente — o [OpenCode](docs/harnesses/opencode.pt-BR.md) tem a integração mais profunda das 9, com `mode`/`agent`/`subtask` nativos.
|
|
252
252
|
|
|
253
253
|
---
|
|
254
254
|
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/package.json",
|
|
3
3
|
"name": "wize-dev-kit",
|
|
4
|
-
"version": "0.
|
|
4
|
+
"version": "0.12.0",
|
|
5
5
|
"description": "Full-lifecycle AI-assisted development kit with Test Architect and Whiteport Design Studio embedded. Inspired by BMAD Method and WDS.",
|
|
6
6
|
"keywords": [
|
|
7
7
|
"ai",
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-app-store-listing
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando o app estiver próximo do lançamento e precisar preparar a listagem na loja (copy, assets, metadados)."
|
|
3
5
|
name: App Store Listing
|
|
4
6
|
overlay: app
|
|
5
7
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper (copy) + Mantis (visual brief)
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-advanced-elicitation
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando uma resposta do usuário parecer subespecificada e precisar de técnicas de elicitação (5 Whys, laddering, premortem) para aprofundar o entendimento."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Advanced Elicitation
|
|
4
6
|
module: core
|
|
5
7
|
status: stub
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-grill
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando uma demanda chegar vaga e precisar de entrevista exaustiva para alcançar entendimento compartilhado antes de produzir qualquer artefato."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Grill
|
|
4
6
|
module: core
|
|
5
7
|
status: ready
|
|
@@ -9,7 +11,7 @@ status: ready
|
|
|
9
11
|
|
|
10
12
|
**Goal.** Interview the user exhaustively about a demand until both sides reach **shared understanding** — before any artifact is drafted. Sharper answers make a sharper brief, PRD, epic, story, or plan. Grill is an input-quality tool, not an artifact of its own.
|
|
11
13
|
|
|
12
|
-
Any persona about to author an artifact can invoke it: Pepper before a brief, Maria Hill before a PRD, Tony before epics/stories/architecture, Wizer when a demand arrives fuzzy. Wizer also **suggests** it from `/wize-help` — always suggest, never force.
|
|
14
|
+
Any persona about to author an artifact can invoke it: Pepper before a brief, Maria Hill before a PRD, Tony before epics/stories/architecture, Wizer when a demand arrives fuzzy. Wizer also **suggests** it from `/wize` (or `/wize-help`) — always suggest, never force.
|
|
13
15
|
|
|
14
16
|
## The five rules
|
|
15
17
|
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-index-docs
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando precisar reconstruir o índice da base de conhecimento (.wize/knowledge/index.md) a partir da árvore real de artefatos."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Index Docs
|
|
4
6
|
module: core
|
|
5
7
|
status: ready
|
|
@@ -114,4 +116,4 @@ total_files: 24
|
|
|
114
116
|
|
|
115
117
|
## Hand-off
|
|
116
118
|
|
|
117
|
-
> "Index rebuilt at `.wize/knowledge/index.md`. {N} files indexed across 5 sections. Next: `/wize-help` reads this file when answering."
|
|
119
|
+
> "Index rebuilt at `.wize/knowledge/index.md`. {N} files indexed across 5 sections. Next: `/wize` (or `/wize-help`) reads this file when answering."
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-document-project
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando o kit for instalado em um repositório existente (brownfield) e precisar documentar o estado atual do projeto."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Document Project (brownfield baseline)
|
|
4
6
|
phase: 1-analysis
|
|
5
7
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper Potts (paired with Peggy Carter and Tony Stark)
|
|
@@ -4,8 +4,15 @@ name: Domain Research
|
|
|
4
4
|
phase: 1-analysis
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper Potts
|
|
6
6
|
status: ready
|
|
7
|
+
description: "Use quando precisar pesquisar um domínio de negócio, indústria ou setor."
|
|
7
8
|
---
|
|
8
9
|
|
|
10
|
+
> **Variante de pesquisa.** Para outros tipos de pesquisa, veja:
|
|
11
|
+
> - Mercado/concorrência → `/wize-market-research`
|
|
12
|
+
> - Domínio/indústria → `/wize-domain-research`
|
|
13
|
+
> - Técnica/stack → `/wize-technical-research`
|
|
14
|
+
> - Pesquisa geral (dispatcher) → `/wize-research`
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
9
16
|
# Domain Research
|
|
10
17
|
|
|
11
18
|
**Goal.** Conduct domain and industry research to ground the product in its business, regulatory, and technical context.
|
|
@@ -4,8 +4,15 @@ name: Market Research
|
|
|
4
4
|
phase: 1-analysis
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper Potts
|
|
6
6
|
status: ready
|
|
7
|
+
description: "Use quando precisar pesquisar mercado, concorrentes, tendências ou posicionamento."
|
|
7
8
|
---
|
|
8
9
|
|
|
10
|
+
> **Variante de pesquisa.** Para outros tipos de pesquisa, veja:
|
|
11
|
+
> - Mercado/concorrência → `/wize-market-research`
|
|
12
|
+
> - Domínio/indústria → `/wize-domain-research`
|
|
13
|
+
> - Técnica/stack → `/wize-technical-research`
|
|
14
|
+
> - Pesquisa geral (dispatcher) → `/wize-research`
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
9
16
|
# Market Research
|
|
10
17
|
|
|
11
18
|
**Goal.** Conduct market research on competition and customers to inform the product brief and PRD.
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-refresh-knowledge
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando o document-project acumulou bullets datados durante o sprint e precisar ser consolidado em uma baseline atualizada."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Refresh Project Knowledge
|
|
4
6
|
phase: 1-analysis
|
|
5
7
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper (drives), with Peggy on prose
|
|
@@ -16,7 +18,7 @@ Pepper drives the consolidation. Peggy edits prose. Tony reviews architecture-sn
|
|
|
16
18
|
|
|
17
19
|
## When to run
|
|
18
20
|
|
|
19
|
-
- **End of sprint** (default cadence). `wize-help next` suggests it when it detects the sprint ended.
|
|
21
|
+
- **End of sprint** (default cadence). `/wize next` (or `/wize-help next`) suggests it when it detects the sprint ended.
|
|
20
22
|
- **After a major epic ships.** Architecture often shifts visibly; this is the moment to consolidate.
|
|
21
23
|
- **Before onboarding a new engineer.** The baseline is the first thing they read; keep it fresh.
|
|
22
24
|
- **Before an audit / external review.** Same.
|
|
@@ -4,113 +4,48 @@ name: Research
|
|
|
4
4
|
phase: 1-analysis
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper Potts
|
|
6
6
|
status: ready
|
|
7
|
+
description: "Use quando precisar pesquisar algo mas não souber qual tipo de pesquisa se aplica."
|
|
7
8
|
---
|
|
8
9
|
|
|
9
|
-
# Research
|
|
10
|
+
# Research (Dispatcher)
|
|
10
11
|
|
|
11
|
-
**Goal.**
|
|
12
|
+
**Goal.** Classify the user's research question and delegate to the correct variant. This skill does NOT execute research directly — it routes to one of the specialized research skills.
|
|
12
13
|
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
+
## Classification guide
|
|
14
15
|
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
+
Analyze the user's question for these signals. Score each category by keyword hits; delegate to the highest-scoring category.
|
|
16
17
|
|
|
17
|
-
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- `.wize/planning/research.md` — short synthesis (≤ 2 pages) referencing sources.
|
|
24
|
-
- `.wize/knowledge/research/{slug}.md` — one file per major source (raw notes, links, attached PDFs).
|
|
18
|
+
| Category | Keywords (pt-BR) | Keywords (EN) | Delegate to |
|
|
19
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20
|
+
| **Market** | concorrência, concorrentes, mercado, competidor, pricing, preço, posicionamento, cliente, segmento, TAM, SAM, market share, G2, Capterra | competitor, market, pricing, positioning, customer, segment | `wize-market-research` |
|
|
21
|
+
| **Domain** | domínio, indústria, setor, regulatório, regulação, compliance, legislação, lei, normativo, PESTLE, tendências do setor | domain, industry, sector, regulatory, compliance, legislation | `wize-domain-research` |
|
|
22
|
+
| **Technical** | técnico, tecnologia, stack, biblioteca, framework, arquitetura, ferramenta, linguagem, banco de dados, API, protocolo, desempenho, escalabilidade | technical, technology, stack, library, framework, architecture, tool, language, database, API, protocol, performance, scalability | `wize-technical-research` |
|
|
25
23
|
|
|
26
24
|
## Steps
|
|
27
25
|
|
|
28
|
-
### 1.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
Convert open questions + hypotheses into a numbered list. Each question is:
|
|
31
|
-
- **Specific** — "What's the median onboarding time for the top 5 competitors?" not "How is onboarding usually done?".
|
|
32
|
-
- **Answerable in a finite pass** — if it takes weeks, decompose.
|
|
33
|
-
- **Tagged with category** — `market / competitive / analytics / interview / desk-research / regulatory`.
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
### 2. Choose the framework that fits each question
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
| Category | Recommended frame | Tools |
|
|
38
|
-
|---|---|---|
|
|
39
|
-
| Market sizing | TAM/SAM/SOM, top-down + bottom-up reconciled | Statista, public filings, gov registries |
|
|
40
|
-
| Competitive | Porter's 5 + feature matrix + pricing scan | competitor sites, G2/Capterra, Pricing/Plans pages |
|
|
41
|
-
| User research | Jobs-to-be-Done (Christensen / Klement) | 5–8 interviews (semi-structured, 30min) |
|
|
42
|
-
| Behavioral | 5W2H + analytics funnel | product analytics (Amplitude/PostHog), session replays |
|
|
43
|
-
| Compliance/legal | Reg list + clause map | gov sites, legal counsel review |
|
|
44
|
-
| Macro context | PESTLE (political/economic/social/technological/legal/environmental) | desk research |
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
### 3. Run focused passes
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
One question, one pass. Don't bundle. For each:
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
- Define what "enough evidence" looks like before starting.
|
|
51
|
-
- Cite or it didn't happen. Links + access date.
|
|
52
|
-
- When numbers conflict across sources, write down both and flag.
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
### 4. Synthesize
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
In `research.md`, for each original question, write:
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
```markdown
|
|
59
|
-
### Q1. {{the question}}
|
|
60
|
-
**Finding:** one sentence answer.
|
|
61
|
-
**Confidence:** high | medium | low
|
|
62
|
-
**Why we believe it:** 2–3 lines + citations [1][2][3].
|
|
63
|
-
**Implication for the brief/PRD:** what changes (or doesn't) because of this.
|
|
64
|
-
```
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
Don't include raw quotes here — link to `.wize/knowledge/research/{slug}.md`.
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
### 5. Flag the gaps
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
End the synthesis with a "Still open" section. List questions we couldn't answer + the cheapest next step (one interview / one analytics query / one expert call). Route back to Wizer with the gap.
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
## Output template (synthesis)
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
```markdown
|
|
75
|
-
---
|
|
76
|
-
status: ready-for-prd
|
|
77
|
-
owner: Pepper Potts
|
|
78
|
-
created: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
79
|
-
---
|
|
26
|
+
### 1. Read the question
|
|
80
27
|
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
28
|
+
Extract the user's research topic or question. If the user provided a long message, identify the core research intent.
|
|
82
29
|
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
**Finding:** …
|
|
85
|
-
**Confidence:** medium
|
|
86
|
-
**Why:** … [1]
|
|
87
|
-
**Implication:** Brief constraint #3 holds; PRD scope can drop feature X.
|
|
30
|
+
### 2. Classify
|
|
88
31
|
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
32
|
+
Match keywords against the classification guide above. Score each category by keyword hits. Pick the highest-scoring category.
|
|
90
33
|
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
- Q5: pricing elasticity in segment S — needs 1 hour with sales lead.
|
|
34
|
+
### 3. Delegate or ask
|
|
93
35
|
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
[2] interview-acme-cto-2026-05-30 — see knowledge/research/acme-cto.md
|
|
97
|
-
```
|
|
36
|
+
- **Clear match (one category dominates):** Delegate to the corresponding variant. Load that skill and hand off the user's question intact — do not rephrase or summarize.
|
|
37
|
+
- **Ambiguous (multiple categories tie or no clear signal):** Ask one clarifying question:
|
|
98
38
|
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
39
|
+
> Isso é pesquisa de mercado, domínio ou técnica?
|
|
100
40
|
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
- **Porter** when picking a market to enter or a defensible moat.
|
|
103
|
-
- **PESTLE** for projects with regulatory or geopolitical exposure.
|
|
104
|
-
- **5 Whys + analytics funnel** when a metric is bad and the cause isn't obvious.
|
|
41
|
+
Wait for the user's answer, then delegate to the chosen variant.
|
|
105
42
|
|
|
106
|
-
## Anti-patterns
|
|
43
|
+
## Anti-patterns
|
|
107
44
|
|
|
108
|
-
-
|
|
109
|
-
-
|
|
110
|
-
-
|
|
111
|
-
- Using brand-name competitor research as user research — they're different.
|
|
112
|
-
- Continuing to research when the decision is already made. Stop and ship.
|
|
45
|
+
- Executing research directly instead of delegating.
|
|
46
|
+
- Asking more than one clarifying question.
|
|
47
|
+
- Guessing when the signal is ambiguous — ask, don't assume.
|
|
113
48
|
|
|
114
49
|
## Hand-off
|
|
115
50
|
|
|
116
|
-
>
|
|
51
|
+
> Pesquisa classificada como {{category}}. Delegando para {{variant}}.
|
|
@@ -4,8 +4,15 @@ name: Technical Research
|
|
|
4
4
|
phase: 1-analysis
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-analyst # Pepper Potts
|
|
6
6
|
status: ready
|
|
7
|
+
description: "Use quando precisar pesquisar tecnologias, stacks, bibliotecas ou decisões técnicas."
|
|
7
8
|
---
|
|
8
9
|
|
|
10
|
+
> **Variante de pesquisa.** Para outros tipos de pesquisa, veja:
|
|
11
|
+
> - Mercado/concorrência → `/wize-market-research`
|
|
12
|
+
> - Domínio/indústria → `/wize-domain-research`
|
|
13
|
+
> - Técnica/stack → `/wize-technical-research`
|
|
14
|
+
> - Pesquisa geral (dispatcher) → `/wize-research`
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
9
16
|
# Technical Research
|
|
10
17
|
|
|
11
18
|
**Goal.** Conduct technical research on technologies, tools, and architecture patterns to inform stack decisions.
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-create-prd
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando o brief + research + trigger map estiverem prontos e precisar convertê-los em um PRD com escopo e acceptance criteria."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Create PRD
|
|
4
6
|
phase: 2-plan
|
|
5
7
|
owner: wize-agent-pm # Maria Hill
|
|
@@ -149,8 +151,7 @@ Maria Hill validates every story's ACs against INVEST:
|
|
|
149
151
|
- **I**ndependent: no implicit dependency on another story being built first.
|
|
150
152
|
- **N**egotiable: details can move; intent can't.
|
|
151
153
|
- **V**aluable: a real outcome to a real user.
|
|
152
|
-
- **
|
|
153
|
-
- **S**mall: ≤ 1 PR worth (sliced finer in Phase 3 if not).
|
|
154
|
+
- **S**mall: ≤ 1 PR worth (sliced finer in Phase 3 if not) — the only sizing test. INVEST's "Estimable" is dropped on purpose: we don't produce time or point estimates.
|
|
154
155
|
- **T**estable: every AC is observable.
|
|
155
156
|
|
|
156
157
|
If any letter fails, fix the story before it leaves Plan.
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-validate-prd
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando o PRD estiver pronto para validação e precisar decidir se ele pode avançar para Solutioning."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Validate PRD
|
|
4
6
|
phase: 2-plan
|
|
5
7
|
owner: wize-agent-pm # Maria Hill (with Pepper, Mantis, Fury input)
|
|
@@ -45,7 +47,7 @@ After `wize-create-prd` produces `status: ready-for-validation`. Run once per ma
|
|
|
45
47
|
### Quality
|
|
46
48
|
- [ ] Every AC is observable (testable by Hawkeye without ambiguity).
|
|
47
49
|
- [ ] No AC contains the word "easy", "intuitive", "responsive" without a numeric criterion.
|
|
48
|
-
- [ ] INVEST: every backbone story passes (independent, negotiable, valuable,
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] INVEST: every backbone story passes (independent, negotiable, valuable, small, testable) — "Estimable" is dropped; we don't estimate, we only check it fits one PR.
|
|
49
51
|
- [ ] No goal repeats a brief constraint as if it were a goal.
|
|
50
52
|
|
|
51
53
|
### Cross-checks
|
|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
2
3
|
code: wize-check-implementation-readiness
|
|
4
|
+
description: "Use quando a arquitetura e as stories estiverem prontas e precisar verificar se o projeto está pronto para entrar em implementação."
|
|
3
5
|
name: Check Implementation Readiness
|
|
4
6
|
phase: 3-solutioning
|
|
5
7
|
owner: wize-agent-architect # Tony Stark (with Hawkeye + Hill)
|