wize-dev-kit 0.1.5 → 0.2.5
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +130 -1
- package/README.md +64 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-document-project/workflow.md +188 -20
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-prfaq/workflow.md +150 -11
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-product-brief/workflow.md +90 -19
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-refresh-knowledge/workflow.md +127 -0
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-research/workflow.md +101 -9
- package/src/method-skills/1-analysis/wize-trigger-map/workflow.md +80 -16
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-create-prd/workflow.md +132 -23
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-ux-design/workflow.md +132 -28
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-ux-scenarios/workflow.md +91 -15
- package/src/method-skills/2-plan-workflows/wize-validate-prd/workflow.md +106 -12
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md +101 -11
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-architecture/workflow.md +197 -29
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md +127 -12
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-design-system/workflow.md +182 -22
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-nfr-principles/workflow.md +142 -16
- package/src/method-skills/3-solutioning/wize-tech-vision/workflow.md +127 -21
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-code-review/workflow.md +105 -10
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-create-story/workflow.md +131 -10
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-dev-story/workflow.md +140 -17
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-quick-dev/workflow.md +121 -18
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-retrospective/workflow.md +112 -10
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-sprint-planning/workflow.md +85 -10
- package/src/method-skills/4-implementation/wize-sprint-status/workflow.md +96 -11
- package/src/orchestrator-skills/wize-help/skill.md +25 -1
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-design/workflow.md +104 -13
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-gate/workflow.md +115 -25
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-nfr/workflow.md +104 -14
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-review/workflow.md +120 -13
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-risk/workflow.md +99 -10
- package/src/tea-skills/wize-tea-trace/workflow.md +83 -12
- package/tools/installer/baseline.js +128 -0
- package/tools/installer/commands/agent.js +197 -0
- package/tools/installer/commands/sync.js +45 -0
- package/tools/installer/commands/update.js +172 -0
- package/tools/installer/version-check.js +117 -0
- package/tools/installer/wize-cli.js +98 -11
|
@@ -3,22 +3,97 @@ code: wize-sprint-planning
|
|
|
3
3
|
name: Sprint Planning
|
|
4
4
|
phase: 4-implementation
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-pm # Maria Hill
|
|
6
|
-
status:
|
|
6
|
+
status: ready
|
|
7
7
|
---
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
# Sprint Planning
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
|
-
**Goal.** Pick what enters this sprint. Capacity-honest, priority-honest.
|
|
11
|
+
**Goal.** Pick what enters this sprint. Capacity-honest, priority-honest, risk-honest. The sprint is a commitment about a small slice of the future, not a wish list.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Maria Hill chairs. Tony advises on slicing. Hawkeye flags risk on stories. Shuri commits to the load.
|
|
12
14
|
|
|
13
15
|
## Inputs
|
|
14
|
-
- Story backlog from `.wize/solutioning/stories/`
|
|
15
|
-
- Velocity history (if exists) from `.wize/implementation/sprint-status.md`
|
|
16
|
-
- Hawkeye risk profile (`risk-profile.md`)
|
|
17
16
|
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
-
|
|
17
|
+
- Story backlog: `.wize/solutioning/stories/`
|
|
18
|
+
- Velocity history: `.wize/implementation/sprint-status.md` (previous sprints) — when present.
|
|
19
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/risk-profile.md`
|
|
20
|
+
- Open `tea-gate` outcomes from last sprint.
|
|
21
|
+
- Team availability for the next interval (vacations, on-call rotation, planned meetings).
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Output
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- New sprint block appended to `.wize/implementation/sprint-status.md`.
|
|
26
|
+
- Story files updated `priority: 1` for chosen stories.
|
|
20
27
|
|
|
21
28
|
## Rules
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
-
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
1. **Capacity = min(history velocity, declared availability).** Not the average of optimistic estimates.
|
|
31
|
+
2. **High-risk stories** (linked to `R-x` HIGH in risk profile) get TEA design done in the planning meeting, not at story start.
|
|
32
|
+
3. **Stretch goals** are explicit, named, not silent. If a stretch ships, great. If not, the sprint isn't a failure.
|
|
33
|
+
4. **Don't carry over without reason.** A carried-over story gets a one-line "why" in the sprint log.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Steps
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 1. Look back (3 min)
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Last sprint: what shipped, what slipped, what surprised. Don't relitigate; observe.
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### 2. Refresh capacity
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
- Person-days available this sprint = sum(working days) × (1 - meetings load).
|
|
44
|
+
- Subtract on-call burden, oncall handoff time, planned reviews.
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
### 3. Pull stories (in priority order)
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
Default selection algorithm:
|
|
49
|
+
- Always pull continuation stories (in-flight from last sprint) first.
|
|
50
|
+
- Then highest-priority stories that fit the capacity.
|
|
51
|
+
- Then risk-driven: high-risk stories (R-HIGH) preferred over more low-risk ones when capacity is tight.
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
For each pulled story, confirm INVEST still holds; re-slice if needed.
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### 4. Reserve buffer
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
10–15% buffer for unknowns (bug fixes, support escalations). Don't fill the sprint to 100% — you'll always pay.
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### 5. Walk the gate plan
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
For each story pulled, what's the TEA gate cadence? Most stories: design at start, trace + review + gate at end. High-risk: include NFR re-check at epic close.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
### 6. Commit (verbal + written)
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
Each engineer reads back the stories they're owning. Hill writes them into the sprint block. Sprint starts.
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## Sprint block template (appended to `sprint-status.md`)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
```markdown
|
|
70
|
+
## Sprint 7 — 2026-06-12 → 2026-06-25
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Capacity:** 24 person-days (3 engineers × 10 days × 0.8 utilization)
|
|
73
|
+
**Carry-over:** E01-S05 (90% done; Shuri); E03-S01 (TEA review pending)
|
|
74
|
+
**Pulled:**
|
|
75
|
+
- E01-S06 — M — owner: Shuri — gate cadence: design+gate
|
|
76
|
+
- E02-S02 — L — owner: Shuri — gate cadence: design+trace+review+gate (R-3)
|
|
77
|
+
- E03-S02 — M — owner: Aaliyah — gate cadence: design+trace+review+gate (R-1)
|
|
78
|
+
- E04-S01 — S — owner: Shuri — gate cadence: smoke (quick-dev pattern)
|
|
79
|
+
- E02-S03 — S — stretch
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
**Out (deferred to Sprint 8):**
|
|
82
|
+
- E03-S03 — reason: depends on E03-S02 ADR
|
|
83
|
+
- E05-S01 — reason: out of NFR-cost budget; revisit
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
**Risks flagged:**
|
|
86
|
+
- E02-S02 — auth refresh story; high-risk; TEA design done at planning.
|
|
87
|
+
```
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Anti-patterns Hill rejects
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
- **"Optimistic" velocity that ignores history.** Use observed velocity.
|
|
92
|
+
- **Stories pulled without owners.** Don't aspire; commit.
|
|
93
|
+
- **Stretch goals so big they're really plan.** Stretch = optional, not "we hope we can."
|
|
94
|
+
- **Pulling a story when its dependency hasn't shipped.** It will sit blocked.
|
|
95
|
+
- **No buffer.** Real sprints have surprises.
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
## Hand-off
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
> Sprint 7 committed at `.wize/implementation/sprint-status.md`. Shuri owns most; Aaliyah picks up E03-S02. Hawkeye, NFR gate due on E03 at sprint end. Wizer, retro on the 25th.
|
|
@@ -3,23 +3,108 @@ code: wize-sprint-status
|
|
|
3
3
|
name: Sprint Status
|
|
4
4
|
phase: 4-implementation
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-pm # Maria Hill
|
|
6
|
-
status:
|
|
6
|
+
status: ready
|
|
7
7
|
---
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
# Sprint Status
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
|
-
**Goal.**
|
|
11
|
+
**Goal.** Keep a snapshot of in-flight work that the team and stakeholders can read in 60 seconds. Sprint status is read by everyone, written by Hill (or delegated to Wizer); the source of truth is the file, not Slack.
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
13
|
+
Update **daily** during a sprint, or after any state change (story moves, blocker appears, gate fails).
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Inputs
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
- `.wize/solutioning/stories/` (current statuses)
|
|
18
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/{epic}/{story}/gate.md` (gate outcomes)
|
|
19
|
+
- The team (verbal stand-up or async update)
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Output
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- Updated entry in `.wize/implementation/sprint-status.md`.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Steps
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### 1. Per story, name a status
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
| Status | Meaning |
|
|
30
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
31
|
+
| `pulled` | Committed for this sprint, not started yet |
|
|
32
|
+
| `in-progress` | Engineer actively working it (or paused < 1 day) |
|
|
33
|
+
| `paused` | Started, paused > 1 day, reason listed |
|
|
34
|
+
| `blocked` | Cannot proceed; depends on a named external resolution |
|
|
35
|
+
| `in-review` | PR open; Hawkeye running design → trace → review |
|
|
36
|
+
| `gate-PASS` / `gate-CONCERNS` / `gate-FAIL` | TEA gate outcome |
|
|
37
|
+
| `shipped` | Merged to main + deployed (when applicable) |
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### 2. Blockers up front
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
Blockers always appear in the top section. Each gets:
|
|
42
|
+
- Owner (the person who can unblock it).
|
|
43
|
+
- Specific ask (the action they should take).
|
|
44
|
+
- Deadline.
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
If a blocker sits longer than 2 days, Hill escalates. Stalled blockers are how sprints fail silently.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### 3. Trend
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Daily, write a one-line trend: *"On track."* / *"At risk for E03-S02 due to vendor outage."* / *"Slipping; will defer E04-S01 to next sprint."*
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### 4. Capture decisions
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
If something material was decided during the sprint that affects the plan (story sliced, scope dropped, ADR opened), append a one-line entry.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## File template
|
|
15
57
|
|
|
16
|
-
## Format
|
|
17
58
|
```markdown
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
- Story E01-S03 — in progress (Shuri). Blocked: no.
|
|
20
|
-
- Story E01-S04 — TEA design — Hawkeye.
|
|
21
|
-
- Story E02-S01 — done (gate PASS).
|
|
59
|
+
# Sprint status
|
|
22
60
|
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
61
|
+
## Sprint 7 — 2026-06-12 → 2026-06-25
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
### Day 4 (2026-06-15)
|
|
64
|
+
**Trend:** On track.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
**Blockers:**
|
|
67
|
+
- (none)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
**Stories:**
|
|
70
|
+
- E01-S05 — gate-PASS — shipped (carry-over from S6).
|
|
71
|
+
- E01-S06 — in-progress — Shuri.
|
|
72
|
+
- E02-S02 — in-review — PR #418; Hawkeye doing trace.
|
|
73
|
+
- E03-S02 — in-progress — Aaliyah.
|
|
74
|
+
- E04-S01 — pulled — Shuri starts after E01-S06.
|
|
75
|
+
- E02-S03 (stretch) — pulled — Aaliyah picks up if capacity allows.
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
**Decisions:**
|
|
78
|
+
- E03-S03 sliced into two stories (E03-S03a, E03-S03b) — ADR-009 incoming.
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### Day 5 (2026-06-16)
|
|
81
|
+
**Trend:** At risk on E02-S02 (vendor sandbox down; Hawkeye unblocked at 14:00).
|
|
82
|
+
**Blockers:** Resolved.
|
|
83
|
+
**Stories:** (changes from Day 4)
|
|
84
|
+
- E02-S02 — gate-PASS at 16:30; merged.
|
|
85
|
+
- E01-S06 — in-review — PR #419.
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
## Sprint 6 — 2026-05-29 → 2026-06-11
|
|
88
|
+
{{archived}}
|
|
25
89
|
```
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## Daily cadence (lean)
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
A daily standup, when present, is 5 minutes max:
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
- "What did I ship since last time?"
|
|
96
|
+
- "What am I shipping next?"
|
|
97
|
+
- "Anything blocking me?"
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
Hill updates `sprint-status.md` immediately after; Wizer reads it before any other agent's session that day.
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
## Anti-patterns Hill rejects
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
- "Status: in progress" for 4 days with no further detail. Either it really is, in which case slice progress, or it's stuck.
|
|
104
|
+
- Blockers without an owner or a deadline.
|
|
105
|
+
- Sprint goals that drift silently (added stories without removing others).
|
|
106
|
+
- Stale entries in the file. Update daily or delegate the update.
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Hand-off
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
> `sprint-status.md` updated. Day 5 trend: at-risk-mitigated. Wizer, if asked about state, the file is the answer. Pepper, brief stays valid; no scope move triggered.
|
|
@@ -58,10 +58,34 @@ Apply this heuristic, top-down. Stop at the first match.
|
|
|
58
58
|
12. **Has active sprint, oldest in-flight story has no `tea/.../design.md`.** → Next: **Hawkeye / `wize-tea-design`** for that story.
|
|
59
59
|
13. **In-flight story exists, no implementation commits.** → Next: **Shuri / `wize-dev-story`** on that story.
|
|
60
60
|
14. **In-flight story exists with code, no `gate.md`.** → Next: **Hawkeye / `wize-tea-trace` → `wize-tea-review` → `wize-tea-gate`** for that story.
|
|
61
|
-
15. **All stories gated.** → Next: **Wizer / `wize-retrospective`** +
|
|
61
|
+
15. **All sprint stories gated `PASS`/`CONCERNS`, backlog has no `ready-for-dev` left.** → Sprint ended. Next: **Wizer / `wize-retrospective`** + **Pepper+Peggy / `wize-refresh-knowledge`** (the inline knowledge notes pile up over the sprint; the refresh consolidates them into the baseline docs).
|
|
62
|
+
16. **All stories gated and no new epic pulled.** → Plan next epic with Tony + Hill, or run a roadmap session.
|
|
62
63
|
|
|
63
64
|
For brownfield repos where `.wize/knowledge/document-project/` is missing, prepend: "Run `wize-document-project` first to baseline the codebase."
|
|
64
65
|
|
|
66
|
+
## Step 2.5 — version-skew detection (proactive)
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Before routing, compare:
|
|
69
|
+
- `kit_version` in `.wize/config/project.toml`
|
|
70
|
+
- The version of the installed kit (from `node_modules/wize-dev-kit/package.json` — *or* the version baked into the activated skills if you don't have a node-side check)
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
If you have access to the user's terminal (Claude Code Bash tool, Codex exec, OpenCode), additionally check the npm registry with a 2-second timeout:
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
```bash
|
|
75
|
+
npm view wize-dev-kit version 2>/dev/null
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
Cases:
|
|
79
|
+
- **Installed version > project.toml's `kit_version`** → suggest `npx wize-dev-kit update` (no `@latest` needed; the installed version is already newer).
|
|
80
|
+
- **Registry > installed version** → suggest `npx wize-dev-kit@latest update` to pick up the newer release.
|
|
81
|
+
- **All three match** → no message; carry on.
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Phrase it as one short line, not a banner. Example:
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
> *"Heads up: registry has 0.2.3, you're on 0.2.2. Want me to run `npx wize-dev-kit@latest update`? (it preserves your `user.toml` and re-renders adapters)"*
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
If the user says yes and you can execute Bash, run it in the project root and stream output. Otherwise, print the command for them to run.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
65
89
|
## Step 3 — respond
|
|
66
90
|
|
|
67
91
|
Default response shape (3 lines). When `user.toml` provides a `[user] name`, include it in the greeting:
|
|
@@ -4,35 +4,126 @@ name: TEA Test Design
|
|
|
4
4
|
gate: design
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-test-architect # Hawkeye
|
|
6
6
|
when: per-story-start
|
|
7
|
-
status:
|
|
7
|
+
status: ready
|
|
8
8
|
---
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
# TEA — Test Design
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
**Goal.** For one story
|
|
12
|
+
**Goal.** For **one story**: declare the test split, the fixtures, the mocks, the environments, and the assertion targets. This is Hawkeye's contract Shuri implements against. No story enters dev without one.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Hawkeye drives. Runs at the start of every story (advisory; can be relaxed only when `tea.toml` says so).
|
|
13
15
|
|
|
14
16
|
## Inputs
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
15
18
|
- `.wize/solutioning/stories/{epic}/{story}.md`
|
|
16
19
|
- `.wize/solutioning/architecture.md`
|
|
20
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/risk-profile.md`
|
|
21
|
+
- Overlay test playbooks if active:
|
|
22
|
+
- `web-overlay/playbooks/playwright-vitest.md`
|
|
23
|
+
- `app-overlay/playbooks/detox-maestro.md`
|
|
17
24
|
|
|
18
25
|
## Output
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
19
27
|
- `.wize/implementation/tea/{epic}/{story}/design.md`
|
|
20
28
|
|
|
21
|
-
##
|
|
29
|
+
## Steps
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### 1. Read the story; map every AC
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
For each AC, write **one assertion-shape sentence**: *"There will be a {kind} test that does {what} and expects {observable}."*
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
### 2. Pick the test split
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Defaults (from `playwright-vitest.md` / `detox-maestro.md`):
|
|
38
|
+
- **Low-risk story:** 70% unit / 20% integration / 10% E2E.
|
|
39
|
+
- **Risk-profile flagged story (R-1..R-3):** add 1–2 dedicated E2E + integration for the risk area.
|
|
40
|
+
- **UI-only story:** 60% unit / 30% component (Testing Library) / 10% E2E.
|
|
41
|
+
- **Server-only story:** 80% unit / 20% integration; no E2E unless an upstream consumer story bundles it.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### 3. Declare fixtures + mocks
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- Fixtures: known users, known DB rows, known files.
|
|
46
|
+
- Mocks: external services at the network boundary (MSW). Don't mock the unit under test.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### 4. Environment
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
- Where it runs (local sim, headless emulator, real device farm).
|
|
51
|
+
- Network conditions (offline / 3G slow / lossy WiFi).
|
|
52
|
+
- OS / browser matrix (from `device-matrix.md` or playwright projects).
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### 5. Edge cases (cheap; pay back × 10)
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
List 3–7 edge cases the ACs don't name but the user might hit:
|
|
57
|
+
- Empty / max-length inputs.
|
|
58
|
+
- IME / paste / autofill.
|
|
59
|
+
- Offline mid-action.
|
|
60
|
+
- Concurrent users on the same resource.
|
|
61
|
+
- Time-zone / DST.
|
|
62
|
+
- Localized number/currency.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
Each gets a test of its own (usually unit).
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
### 6. Hand off
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Mark `status: ready-for-dev` in the design.md frontmatter. Shuri reads before starting.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## YAML frontmatter (canonical)
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
22
72
|
```yaml
|
|
23
73
|
---
|
|
24
74
|
gate: design
|
|
25
|
-
story_id:
|
|
26
|
-
ac_ids: [AC-1, AC-2
|
|
75
|
+
story_id: E01-S03
|
|
76
|
+
ac_ids: [AC-02-1, AC-02-2]
|
|
77
|
+
status: PASS
|
|
78
|
+
created_at: 2026-06-11T12:00:00Z
|
|
27
79
|
test_split:
|
|
28
|
-
unit: count
|
|
29
|
-
integration: count
|
|
30
|
-
e2e: count
|
|
31
|
-
fixtures:
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
80
|
+
unit: { count: 4, description: "validation, server-action contract, error mapper, mailer payload" }
|
|
81
|
+
integration: { count: 1, description: "server action calls mailer with right args, against MSW" }
|
|
82
|
+
e2e: { count: 1, description: "happy path; Playwright @chromium @ios" }
|
|
83
|
+
fixtures:
|
|
84
|
+
- "new-admin user"
|
|
85
|
+
- "empty team"
|
|
86
|
+
mocks:
|
|
87
|
+
- "Resend via MSW"
|
|
88
|
+
- "Auth session via fixture cookie"
|
|
89
|
+
environment: "local + Playwright project chromium + ios"
|
|
90
|
+
risk_links: [R-1]
|
|
91
|
+
edges:
|
|
92
|
+
- "invalid email rules: blank, missing @, weird IME chars"
|
|
93
|
+
- "duplicate teammate email"
|
|
94
|
+
- "offline at submit time"
|
|
34
95
|
---
|
|
35
96
|
```
|
|
36
97
|
|
|
37
|
-
## Body
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
98
|
+
## Body of `design.md`
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
```markdown
|
|
101
|
+
## Per-AC assertion shapes
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
- **AC-02-1**: Vitest unit on `validateInviteEmail()` → returns `{ ok: true }` for `name+tag@example.com`. Vitest integration on `inviteTeammate()` server action → asserts `mailer.send` called once with `{ to: 'name@example.com', template: 'team-invite' }`. Playwright E2E → clicks "Send invite", asserts `[data-testid="invite-sent-banner"]` appears within 1s.
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
- **AC-02-2**: Vitest unit on `validateInviteEmail()` → returns `{ ok: false, code: 'invalid_format', field: 'email' }` for empty/no-@. Component test (Testing Library) on `<InviteForm>` → asserts the input's `aria-describedby` error region announces "Enter a valid email."
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Edge cases (additional tests)
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
- E1: Empty email — `validateInviteEmail('')` → `invalid_format`.
|
|
110
|
+
- E2: 254-char local part — boundary check; expect graceful clipping.
|
|
111
|
+
- E3: Same email submitted twice — second call hits `inviteTeammate()`, asserts second insert is a no-op (idempotency key based on `(team_id, email)`).
|
|
112
|
+
- E4: Offline at submit — Playwright `context.setOffline(true)` after click; banner shows "We'll retry when you're back online."
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
## Run plan
|
|
115
|
+
- On every PR: full unit + integration; E2E `@smoke` tag only (≤ 30s).
|
|
116
|
+
- Nightly: full E2E suite + Lighthouse baseline.
|
|
117
|
+
```
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
## Anti-patterns Hawkeye rejects
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
- **`design.md` written after dev started.** Then the story slipped through; flag.
|
|
122
|
+
- **One test per AC, no edges.** Edges are where users live.
|
|
123
|
+
- **Mocking the unit under test.** You'd be testing the mock.
|
|
124
|
+
- **E2E that test the happy path only.** Cover failure too.
|
|
125
|
+
- **Selectors by visible text in a multilingual app.** Use `data-testid` or `role` with locale-aware patterns.
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
## Hand-off
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
> Test design for E01-S03 at `.wize/implementation/tea/E01-S03/design.md`. 4 unit, 1 integration, 1 E2E, plus 4 edges. Shuri can start; I'll check `tea-trace.md` against this when the PR opens.
|
|
@@ -4,48 +4,138 @@ name: TEA Gate Decision
|
|
|
4
4
|
gate: gate
|
|
5
5
|
owner: wize-agent-test-architect # Hawkeye
|
|
6
6
|
when: story-final
|
|
7
|
-
status:
|
|
7
|
+
status: ready
|
|
8
8
|
---
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
# TEA — Gate Decision
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
**Goal.** Final per-story
|
|
12
|
+
**Goal.** Final per-story decision. **PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL / WAIVED** with documented rationale, score, and policy mode. This is the line: a story doesn't advance past it without a recorded gate.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Hawkeye drives. The four inputs (`design`, `trace`, `review`, plus `nfr` at epic boundary) feed in. Policy is read from `.wize/config/tea.toml`.
|
|
13
15
|
|
|
14
16
|
## Inputs
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
-
|
|
17
|
-
-
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/{epic}/{story}/design.md`
|
|
19
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/{epic}/{story}/trace.md`
|
|
20
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/{epic}/{story}/review.md`
|
|
21
|
+
- `.wize/implementation/tea/nfr/{epic}.md` (when the story is the last of its epic)
|
|
22
|
+
- `.wize/config/tea.toml`
|
|
18
23
|
|
|
19
24
|
## Output
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
20
26
|
- `.wize/implementation/tea/{epic}/{story}/gate.md`
|
|
21
27
|
|
|
28
|
+
## Decision rules
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
| Inputs | Recommendation |
|
|
31
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
32
|
+
| All ACs `met`, no findings | **PASS** |
|
|
33
|
+
| All ACs `met`, only low/medium non-blocking findings | **PASS** with notes (or **CONCERNS** depending on count) |
|
|
34
|
+
| Any AC `partial` | **CONCERNS** |
|
|
35
|
+
| Any AC `not-met` | **FAIL** |
|
|
36
|
+
| NFR `FAIL` on the epic (last story) | **FAIL** |
|
|
37
|
+
| `tea-review` flagged `knowledge_axes_touched` ≠ `knowledge_axes_updated` (any axis touched without update) | **CONCERNS** (advisory mode) / **FAIL** (enforcing mode) — adds finding `KN-NN` |
|
|
38
|
+
| Failing AC OR non-neg NFR with documented business rationale + senior signoff | **WAIVED** |
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
Score (0–100): heuristic. `100 - (10 × high) - (5 × medium) - (2 × low)`. Floor 0.
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
## Policy
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
`.wize/config/tea.toml` sets `policy = "advisory"` (default) or `"enforcing"`.
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
- **Advisory:** `FAIL` is a visible warning in PR; merge isn't auto-blocked. The team decides.
|
|
47
|
+
- **Enforcing:** `FAIL` blocks merge via CI status check (`tea-gate`). PASS / CONCERNS allowed through.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## Steps
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### 1. Read the three inputs
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
If trace shows `partial`, you know the recommendation. If review recommends FAIL, you've got your decision. The gate doc just records it.
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### 2. Compute score
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
Don't game it. The score communicates magnitude to humans skimming a backlog.
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### 3. Write the doc
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
Frontmatter is the structured truth. The body is the narrative for humans.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
### 4. Notify
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
Update the PR description with the gate verdict + link to the doc. Maria Hill watches the gate status in `sprint-status.md`.
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
22
67
|
## YAML frontmatter (canonical)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
23
69
|
```yaml
|
|
24
70
|
---
|
|
25
71
|
gate: gate
|
|
26
|
-
story_id:
|
|
27
|
-
status: PASS
|
|
28
|
-
score:
|
|
29
|
-
policy: advisory
|
|
72
|
+
story_id: E01-S03
|
|
73
|
+
status: PASS
|
|
74
|
+
score: 95
|
|
75
|
+
policy: advisory
|
|
30
76
|
inputs:
|
|
31
|
-
-
|
|
32
|
-
-
|
|
33
|
-
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
77
|
+
design: ".wize/implementation/tea/E01-S03/design.md"
|
|
78
|
+
trace: ".wize/implementation/tea/E01-S03/trace.md"
|
|
79
|
+
review: ".wize/implementation/tea/E01-S03/review.md"
|
|
80
|
+
nfr: null # not the last story of E01
|
|
35
81
|
findings:
|
|
36
|
-
- id:
|
|
37
|
-
severity: low
|
|
38
|
-
summary:
|
|
39
|
-
recommendation:
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
82
|
+
- id: REV-01
|
|
83
|
+
severity: low
|
|
84
|
+
summary: "Empty-state copy slightly differs from Mantis' spec."
|
|
85
|
+
recommendation: "Update `<EmptyTeamPanel>` heading in a follow-up."
|
|
86
|
+
- id: KN-01
|
|
87
|
+
severity: medium
|
|
88
|
+
summary: "Story added a new component (`<InviteForm>`) but architecture-snapshot.md was not updated."
|
|
89
|
+
recommendation: "Add 2 lines to `.wize/knowledge/document-project/architecture-snapshot.md` under a dated bullet referencing the new component + its public testid contract."
|
|
90
|
+
owner: shuri
|
|
91
|
+
blocking: false # advisory mode; would be true under enforcing
|
|
92
|
+
waived_by: null
|
|
93
|
+
waived_reason: null
|
|
94
|
+
created_at: 2026-06-11T20:30:00Z
|
|
43
95
|
---
|
|
44
96
|
```
|
|
45
97
|
|
|
46
|
-
## Body
|
|
47
|
-
Narrative explanation; structured data is the YAML.
|
|
98
|
+
## Body of `gate.md`
|
|
48
99
|
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
100
|
+
```markdown
|
|
101
|
+
## Verdict
|
|
102
|
+
**PASS** (score 95)
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
## Why
|
|
105
|
+
- All ACs met with observed evidence.
|
|
106
|
+
- Trace clean; coverage 100% on ACs, partial on edges (E3, E4) — tracked for follow-up.
|
|
107
|
+
- Review found one low-severity copy finding (REV-01).
|
|
108
|
+
- Story is not the last in epic 01; NFR gate runs separately at epic boundary.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## Notes for follow-up
|
|
111
|
+
- Open a tiny story (or include in next sprint planning) to fix REV-01 and close edges E3, E4.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## Trail
|
|
114
|
+
- design.md → 4/1/1 split (unit/integration/e2e) + 4 edges declared.
|
|
115
|
+
- trace.md → all ACs `covered`; E3 `partial`, E4 `missing` (follow-up).
|
|
116
|
+
- review.md → ACs `met`, scope mostly disciplined, copy nit.
|
|
117
|
+
- nfr.md → N/A (mid-epic).
|
|
118
|
+
```
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
## When to WAIVE
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Rare. Examples:
|
|
123
|
+
- A failing E2E that depends on a flaky external sandbox; the production code is unaffected; sign-off by Tony + Hill.
|
|
124
|
+
- A non-negotiable temporarily slipped because of an external integration blocker; we ship with mitigation in place; sign-off by Fury.
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
A WAIVE always lists:
|
|
127
|
+
- Who waived (`waived_by`).
|
|
128
|
+
- Why (`waived_reason`).
|
|
129
|
+
- The compensating control (a follow-up story, an SLA monitor, a feature flag).
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## Anti-patterns Hawkeye rejects
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
- **Gating without `review.md`.** No review → no gate.
|
|
134
|
+
- **PASS with a `not-met` AC.** Auto-fail.
|
|
135
|
+
- **WAIVED with no `waived_by` field.** Reject.
|
|
136
|
+
- **Scoring jiggered to clear a threshold.** Trust trumps point-scoring; if the count says 70, don't write 91.
|
|
137
|
+
- **Enforcing mode gates without CI check wiring.** Ghost gate; remove or wire it.
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
## Hand-off
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
> Gate for E01-S03: **PASS** (score 95). One low-severity finding logged for follow-up. Maria Hill, sprint-status updated; Shuri, ready to start the next story.
|